Banat′S Journal of Biotechnology MONITORING of THE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Banat′S Journal of Biotechnology MONITORING of THE Available on-line at http://www.bjbabe.ro Banats Journal of Biotechnology 2012, III(6), MONITORING OF THE ENTOMOFAUNA IN ECOLOGICAL CROP ROTATION DOI: 10.7904/2068 – 4738 – III(6) – 104 Evgeniya D. ZHEKOVA Institute of Agriculture and Seed Science “Obraztsov chiflik”, 7007 – Rousse, str.”Prof. Ivan Ivanov” № 1, Bulgaria E–mail: [email protected] Abstract: During the period 2009–2010 a monitoring of entomofauna was performed in environmentally justified crop rotation including rotation of legumes (beans, soybean) and cereals (wheat, wintering oats) in two variants–control (without fertilization), and foliar fertilization by Humustim humate fertilizer. Conventional entomological methods were used for determination of species and population density of harmful plants and their entomophaga. The results were processed by crops. Differences in species composition of entomofauna were found in variants fertilized by Humustim, compared to those without fertilization. In no one of the four crops pests in density over Economic Threshold Level (ETL) were detected. Diversity of entomophaga was explained via the favorable ecological environmental conditions and namely by the presence of the trophic factor and the lack of chemical treatments with insecticides. Keywords: entomofauna, ecological crop rotation. Introduction cereals under conditions of organic Cereals and legumes are significant farming. structure–defining crops. Because of their wide spread in Material and methods agriculture, their pests and the chemicals The investigation was conducted for control were explored in details during the period 2009–2010 at the [DONCHEV, 1961; DERIMANOV, 1962; KRUSTEVAQ 1995; Experimental field of Institute of YANKOVA et al, 2004; NIKOLOVA, 2006; DIMITROV, 2008]. agriculture and seed science “Obraztsov But one–sided and long–term chiflik”–Rousse in four–pole crop rotation, application of the conventional plant including growing and rotation of the protection leads to many negative crops–beans, wheat, soybeans and subsequences, as one of them being wintering oats under conditions of organic violation of the biological equilibrium in farming. agrocenosis. The trial started after the Block An alternative of the chemical method in two variants control (without method is the integrated plant protection fertilization) and foliar fertilization by and the organic farming [KAROV, 1999]. humate “Humustim” fertilizer in four The organic farming is becoming replications, harvesting plot being 52,5 more popular because of the m2. contemporary requirements for protecting The growing of crops was according of human and animal health in the the requirements of Ordinance N environment. In the system of the organic 22/04.07.2001 of MAF about organic plant farming it is relied on application of production. appropriate crop rotation, organic In order species composition of fertilizers, biological and agro technical harmful and useful entomofauna to be pest control [STANCHEVA, 2003; STOICHEV, 2004]. determined during the vegetation of The objective of the study was crops, monitoring was performed every species composition and population seven days in clear and calm weather. abundance of harmful and useful A conventional cutting method was entomofauna in ecologically justified crop used with a standard entomological sack rotation, including legumes in rotation with (0,3 x 0,7 x 1,0 m)–25 slopes = 5 m2, as 104 Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Timisoara, Contact: web: http://www.bjbabe.ro, e-mail: bjb@usab–tm.ro insects caught were killed and identified participation, subdominant–from 5 to by type. 15%, the secondary–from 1 to 5%. The perambulating method was used for complete monitoring the trial. Results The results were processed by As a result of this investigation it crops. The classification of species was was found: made after BOICHEV, 1975, according which: 1. Oats–The total number of insects the dominant species showed over 15% caught in 2009 was 2317 pcs., and in 2010 – 980 pcs., distributed by as follows: Number Order 2009 2010 Coleoptera 173 248 Diptera 788 88 Heteroptera 240 118 Homoptera/ suborders Aphididae + Cicadinea/ 871+ 90 103 + 149 Hymenoptera 30 18 Thysanoptera 123 250 Orthoptera 2 5 Lepidoptera 0 1 Table 1. The most commonly found insects in both variants in oats 2009 2010 Insects With fertilization, Without With Without pcs. fertilization,pcs. fertilization,pcs. fertilization, pcs. thrips 44 49 100 150 cicads 45 46 39 110 aphids 348 547 58 103 ladybug 11 6 7 1 caspid grain bug 83 60 40 53 wheat sawfly 0 2 0 4 nabis 1 4 3 7 wheat fly 119 70 33 14 In 2009 alphids /Sitobion avenae L. Of useful insects 14–vesicular and Schizaphis graminum Rond./ and ladybug /Coccinula wheat fly /family Chloropidae/ dominated. quatuordecimpustulata L./ and nabis Thrips /Haplothrips tritici Kurd. and /genus Nabis/ were the most commonly Stenothrps graminum Uzel. / and found. The total number of insects pentatomid eurygaster /Eurygaster registered in the variant with Humustim integriceps Put./ were subdominants. fertilizer in 2009 was 1173 pcs., and in Of useful insects 7–spotted ladybug 2010–491 pcs. In 2009 in the variant / Coccinella septempunctata L. / and without fertilization, 1144 pcs. were nabis /genus Nabis/ were most commonly registered, and in 2010–980 pcs. found. The most commonly found insects In 2010 thrips /Haplothrips tritici in both variants were shown in Table 1. Kurd. and Stenothrps graminum Uzel./ Some differences in species and broad–bean weevil /Bruchus composition of the entomofauna were rufimanus Boh./ dominated. Pentatomid observed by variants. eurygaster /Eurygaster integriceps Put./ In 2009 in variant fertilized with and aphids /Sitobion avenae L. and Humustim the following species were Schizaphis graminum Rond./ were registered, not being found in variant subdominant. without fertilization: cabbage stem flea 105 Available on-line at http://www.bjbabe.ro Banats Journal of Biotechnology 2012, III(6), beetle /Psylliodes chrysocephala L./, registered, not being found in variant Sitona beetle /g. Sitona/, flea beetle/ without fertilization: Malachius Phyllotreta atra F./, 14–spotted ladybug bipustslatus L., earth fleahopper /Propylaea quatuordecimpunctata L./, /Phyllotreta armoracia Koch./, beet scale Aelia acuminata L. and dolycoris bug /Cassida nebulosa L./ and 14–spotted /Dolycoris baccarum L./. ladybug /Propylea quatuordecimpunctata In variant without fertilization by L./. Humustim the following species were In the variant without Humustim found, not being registered in variant with fertilizer the following species were fertilization: 14–vesicular ladybug registered, not being found in variant with /Coccinella quatuordecimpustulata L./, fertilization: pea weevil /Bruchus pisorum pea weevil /Bruchus pisorum (pisi) L./, (pisi) L./, wheat sawfly–borrer / Cephus alfalfa plant bug /Adelphocoris lineolatus pygmaeus L./ and tarnish plant bug of g. Goeze./, wheat sawfly–borer / Cephus Lygus. pygmaeus L./, spotted ladybug /Stethorus 2. Wheat–The total number of punctillum Ws./, and cantaris /Cantaris insects caught in 2009 was 1485 pcs., sp./. and in 2010–1005 pcs., distributed by In 2010 in variant fertilized with orders, as follows: Humustim the following species were Number Order 2009 2010 Coleoptera 138 463 Diptera 271 50 Heteroptera 139 123 Homoptera /suborders Aphididae + Cicadinea/ 358+35 13+194 Hymenoptera 59 14 Thysanoptera 477 130 Orthoptera 2 7 Neuroptera 3 8 Lepidoptera 3 3 Table 2. The most commonly found insects in both variants in wheat 2009 2010 Insects With fertilization, Without With Without pcs. fertilization, pcs. fertilization, pcs. fertilization, pcs. aphids 212 156 10 3 wheat fly 51 17 12 2 wheat sawfly–borrer 6 2 4 1 caspid grain bug 83 60 42 39 thrips 200 312 55 75 wide–bean weevil 26 29 91 118 anisoplia beetle 1 3 5 7 ladybug 6 7 31 15 In 2009 aphids /Sitobion avenae L. Subdominants were: thrips /Haplothrips and Schizaphis graminum Rond./, wheat tritici Kurd. and Stenothrps graminum fly /family Chloropidae/ and thrips Uzel./, green cicads /Cicadella viridis L./ /Haplothrips tritici Kurd. and Stenothrps and 14–vesicular ladybug /Coccinula graminum Uzel./ dominated. Pentatomid quatuordecimpustulata L./. eurygaster /Eurygaster integriceps Put./ The total number of insects found in was subdominant. variant fertilized by Humustim in 2009 In 2010 vetch broad–bean weevil was 836 pcs., and in 2010–469 pcs. 649 /Bruchus rufimanus Boh./ dominated. 106 Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Timisoara, Contact: web: http://www.bjbabe.ro, e-mail: bjb@usab–tm.ro pcs. were registered in variant without L./, wheat ear fly /Meromyza nigriventris fertilization in 2009, and in 2010–536 pcs. Meq./ and flea beetle /Phyllotreta atra F./. Insects, the most commonly found In variant without Humustim, the in both variants were shown in Table 2. following species were registered, not In 2009 in variant with fertilization been found in variant with fertilization: by Humustim the following species were Chrysopa carnea Steph., 22–spotted found, not being registered in variant ladybug /Thea vigintiduopunctata L./, 5– without fertilization: large green spotted weevil /Aoromius grasshopper /Tettigonia viridissima L./, quinquepunctatus L./, black wheat dolycoris bug /Dolycoris baccarum L./, sawfly–borrer /Trachelus tabidus F./, Moorish bug /Eurygaster maura L./, blue wheat sawfly–borrer /Cephus pygmaeus corn leech /Oulema lichenis Voet./ and L./ and Psammotettix striatus L.. Telenomus
Recommended publications
  • A Tour Through North America; Together with a Comprehensive View of the Canadas and United States, As Adapted for Agricultural Emigration
    Library of Congress A tour through North America; together with a comprehensive view of the Canadas and United States, as adapted for agricultural emigration. A TOUR THROUGH NORTH AMERICA; TOGETHER WITH A COMPREHENSIVE VIEW OF THE CANADAS AND UNITED STATES. AS ADAPTED FOR AGRICULTURAL EMIGRATION. BY PATRICK SHIRREFF, FARMER, MUNGOSWELLS, EAST LOTHIAN. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CITY OF WASHINGTON EDINBURGH: PRINTED BY BALLANTYNE AND COMPANY, PAUL'S WORK, CANONGATE. PUBLISHED BY OLIVER AND BOYD, EDINBURGH; SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, & CO., LONDON; DAVID ROBERTSON, GLASGOW; AND WILLIAM CURRY, JUN. AND CO., DUBLIN. 1835. msu E165 S55 TO MR JOHN DEANS, PENSTON, EAST LOTHIAN. My dear Deans, I dedicate the following tour to you, who had an opportunity of judging of many of the scenes and occurrences which I have described. Your candour and honesty have A tour through North America; together with a comprehensive view of the Canadas and United States, as adapted for agricultural emigration. http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbtn.27889 Library of Congress long been known to me, and I hope the sentiments and the feelings expressed in the succeeding pages, will be found to accord with your own character. It has been said that I was appointed by a party of East Lothian farmers to visit and report on the Canadas and the United States; but nothing could be more unfounded. A younger brother having expressed a wish to try his fortune as an American farmer, I resolved to explore the country for the purpose of enabling me to give an opinion on the step which he contemplated. With this single object in view, my Transatlantic excursion was originally planned, and ii afterwards performed, unfettered and unassisted by any party whatever.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Resistance to Pests and Pathogens
    MECHANISMSMECHANISMS OFOF RESISTANCERESISTANCE TOTO PESTSPESTS ANDAND PATHOGENSPATHOGENS Moderator: Kimberly Wallin Tree Breeding for Pest Resistance for the Next 50 years: the search for cross resistance? Alvin Yanchuk A long history pest and disease resistance research in forestry…. 1966 1992 20082008 FAOFAO surveysurvey ofof thethe literatureliterature toto documentdocument statusstatus // impactimpact ofof treetree improvementimprovement programmesprogrammes addressingaddressing diseasedisease andand pestpest resistanceresistance 2003 1996 1953 Disease resistance breeding • western white and sugar pines – blister rust resistance • USDA For Serv (Moscow, ID; Doreena, OR; IFG, CA) • BC MoFR and Canadian Forest Service • loblolly and slash pines – fusiform rust resistance • NCSU / U. Florida / WGTIP • radiata pine – Dothistroma (RPBC-FRI (Scion)) • poplars – e.g., Greenwood / many European countries) –Melampspora, Septoria, Venturia • chestnut Insect resistance breeding Improvement Programs • spruces – white pine weevil (B.C.) – aphids (DK,UK) • poplar – long-horned beetle, stem borers (China, US) – leaf beetles Research / Screening Programs • >> leaf beetles – poplars, ‘Eucs’ • >> mammals- ‘Eucs’, redcedar • >> adelgids in spruce • >> birch borer / ash borer • >> bark beetles (lodgepole pine) • >> many others!! Tree Improvement and Breeding Programmes for Pest and Disease Resistance…..summary • ~ 260 resistance ‘research programmes’ identified • ~ 20 programmes are ‘using’ or have identified resistance materials • only 4-5 major commercial
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Bibliography of the Hessian Fly Phytophaga Destructor (Say)
    .■;'TrKA"??^ =V=^TWKî^ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Miscellaneous Publication No. 198 WASHINGTON, D.C. ISSUED SEPTEMBER 1934 i.4^« J7 AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE HESSIAN FLY PHYTOPHAGA DESTRUCTOR (SAY) BY J. S. WADE Associate Entomologist Division of Cereal and Forage Insects Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. Price 10 cents *42 :^^n9fíH UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Miscellaneous Publication No. 198 Washington, D.C. September 1934 AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE HESSIAN FLY, PHYTOPHAGA DESTRUCTOR (SAY) By J. S". WADE, associate entomologistf Division of Cereal and Forage Insects, Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine INTRODUCTION It is the purpose of this publication to present in a form as condensed as is feasible an annotated bibliography of the hessian fly, Phytophaga destructor (Say), with special reference to the literature relating to the insect within its areas of distribution in North America north of Mexico, to June 30, 1933. The outstanding importance of this insect as a crop pest and the almost incalculable damage it has wrought to American farmers since it gained entry into the United States indicate that it will continue to be a subject of great interest and study, and the value of a bibliography to future investigators is obvious. This bibliography presents results of some 18 years of collection by the compiler in a number of the larger public libraries in the eastern part of the United States. The assembling and much of the work, however, has been done at Washington where, through the facilities of departmental and other libraries, such studies can be prosecuted with a fullness and completeness not elsewhere possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Danish Field Trials 2000-2018
    DANISH FIELD TRIALS 2000-18 AARHUS 11TH NORBARAG MICHAEL KRISTENSEN UNIVERSITY 7 MARCH 2019 ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF AGROECOLOGY DANISH FIELD TRIALS 2000-2018 Focus is on general trends in the use of insecticides on major crops: yield, pests, trials, ”major pest events”. Not a statistical meta-analysis, but a subjective reading based on the questions: a) is it worthwhile using insecticides? b) is there emerging resistance? AARHUS 11TH NORBARAG MICHAEL KRISTENSEN UNIVERSITY 7 MARCH 2019 ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF AGROECOLOGY WINTER WHEAT (1) ▪ Cereal aphids: Bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi), English grain aphid (Sitobion avenae), Rose- grain aphid (Metopolophium dirhodum) ▪ Most years weak/moderate aphid infestations in the summer. Three years had heavy, but late infestations. ▪ In autumns 2011, 2014 and 2016, a significant number of grain aphids were found. ▪ The strongest infestation ever was observed in the autmun 2014 and was followed by the strongest attack of barley yellow dwarf virus. ▪ Several years with trials with Karate, Mavrik, Pirimor (reduced doses and treatment threshold): Only increase in yield in cases with high aphid infestation. Percentage infested plants AARHUS 11TH NORBARAG MICHAEL KRISTENSEN Fra Oversigt over Landsforsøge 2018, p. 85. UNIVERSITY 7 MARCH 2019 ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF AGROECOLOGY WINTER WHEAT (2) ▪ Pheromon monitoring of wheat fly (Contarinia tritici) and orange wheat blossom midge (Sitodiplosis mosellana): Control experiments gives yield increase when applied early. ▪ Cereal leaf beetle (Oulema melanopus), frit flies (Oscinella frit) and the ground beetle (Zabrus tenebrioides) are occasional pests. ▪ Reports on potential control problems in aphids in 2009. Pontential case of resistance. AARHUS 11TH NORBARAG MICHAEL KRISTENSEN UNIVERSITY 7 MARCH 2019 ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF AGROECOLOGY WINTER BARLEY (FROM 2012) & OAT ▪ In autumns 2012-13, 2015, 2017 there were relatively weak infestations of grain aphids in winter barley.
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of Spiders in Agrocenoses
    Importance of spiders in agrocenoses 1 Spiders just as any other natural enemies of harmful organisms and pollinating insects are among important beneficial organisms present on farmlands. They pro- vide an ecosystem service for the agriculture undoubtedly contri- buting to the reduction of harvest losses and greater yields in agri- cultural production. Supporting presence and diversity of spiders is important not only for the envi- ronment, but also for sustainable A spider from the wolf spiders (Lycosidae) family functioning of human-made eco- Photo by A. Król systems. What should you know about spiders? Spiders are a diverse group of predatory animals with a size of several millimetres that inhabit the majority of terrestrial ecosystems and spread easily by air. Spiders are animals belonging to the Arthropoda phylum and form the Arachnida class along with harvestmen, mites, pseudoscorpions and other closely related groups. Spiders can be easily distinguished from other similar animals as their body is composed of two clearly separated segments – cephalothorax (anterior part) and abdomen (posterior part) joined by a pedicel. The cephalothorax bears four pairs of legs and two pairs of appendages ahead of its mouth (chelicerae ended with venomous fangs and pedipalps). The front part of ceph- alothorax bears eyes in numbers of six to eight for our native species. An arrangement of eyes is a useful diag- nostic feature for the identification of spider families. Another im- portant feature that allows us to identify the spiders by species level is the structure of their sexual organs. Marsh wolf-spider (Pardosa palustris) from the wolf spiders family.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Llgttieultwrat Expettiment Station
    BUL~ETIN -QF THE- Ohio llgttieultwrat Expettiment Station. VoL. IV, No.5. SECOND SERIES. SEPT. 1, 1891. ARTICLE VIII.-THE WHEAT MIDGE, Diplosis tritici, KIRBY. Wheat 1\fidge-.Diplosis iritici. (a) llfale; (b) female; (a') natural size; (c) wing, greatly en­ larged; (d) antenna! joints of male; (e) ditto, of female; (/) ovipm•itor; (g) eggs, greatly magni· fled: (h) flower of wheat, showing larne on kernel; (i) larva in repose; (j) ditto, crawling; (j') natural size; (k) enlarged view of anterior end when moving; (1) posterior end, with teeth protruding to aid ill motion. (After Fitch.) 100 OHIO EXPERDIE:XT STATIO:X. This depredator is known also as the Red Weevil, on account of the color of the maggots or young, and under this name will be best recognized by farmers, especially those who witnessed its ravages in 1854. Others will readily understand the nature of the pest by its oc· currence in the heads of the wheat, under the chaff, giving these, when very abundant, a reddish appearance somewhat resembling rust. This insect belongs to the order Diptera, or two-winged flies, and to the family Cecidomyidre. In the light of exact knowledge, the original discovery of the species dates back to the year 1795. In the summer of that year, and in the neighborhood of Ipswich, Suffolk, England, Rev. Wm. Kirby, the noted British entomologist, found citron-colored larvre between the corolla and the grain. Indefinite references to what may have been this pest go back to 1741.* The following year, 1796, a farmer of Hertfordshire, detected the larvre attacking the ears of wheat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legislature
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) ----- :oocu~IENTS PRINTED BY ORDER OP THE LEGISLATURE OJ' TBll STATE OF ¥AINE, A. D. 1858. AUGUSTA: STEVENS .Ii SAYWARD, PRINTERS TO TllB STATE, 1858. SHORT HORN BULL "DUKE OF GLO'STER.'' (11,382,) For pedigree, see English Herd ·Book, volume 10th, page 58.-Imported by L. G. Morris and N. J.. Becar in 1854 ; now the property of Samuel Thorne, of Thornedale, Washington Hollow, Duchess·Co., N. Y. SECOND ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE MAINE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE, 18 57. AUGUSTA: STEVENS & SAYWARD, PRINTERS TO THE STATE, 1858. 130ARD OF AGRICULTURE-1857. STATUTE MEMBERS: Trrn GOVERNOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE, MEMBERS Ex-OFFICIIS. Society. Name. Androscoggin, ROBERT MARTIN. Aroostook, . JOSEPH D. PIKE. Cumberland, E. G. BUXTON. Franklin, J OSEPII KEITH. Kennebec, . IIoRACE PARLIN. Lincoln, EBENEZER COBB. Oxford, DARIUS FORBES. Penobscot, . E. F. CRANE. Piscataquis, CALVIN 0HA1\IBERLAIN. Sagadahoc, . CHARLES J. GILMAN. Somerset, . THOMAS FULLER. Washington, NATHAN p ATTANGALL. Waldo, THOMAS w. CUNNINGHAM. York, s. L. GOODALE. HONORARY MEMBERS: Bangor Horticultural, HENRY LITTLE. Maine Pomological, D. A. FAIRBANKS. North Penobscot, WILLIAM R. HERSEY. North Franklin, SEWARD DILL. North Kennebec, ISAAC W. BRITTON, South Kennebec, NATHAN FOSTER. Penobscot and Aroostook Union, 1\foRGAN L. GERRY, West Somerset, . w. B. SNOW. S. L. GOODALE, Secretary. STATE OF MAINE. An act to amend an act entitled "An act to establish a.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Enemies of the Small Grains Lawrence Bruner University of Nebraska
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 1893 Insect Enemies of the Small Grains Lawrence Bruner University of Nebraska Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Entomology Commons Bruner, Lawrence, "Insect Enemies of the Small Grains" (1893). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 402. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/402 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. , HARVARD UNIVERSITY. LIBRARY OF THE llU8EUK OF OO~~~ ZOOLOGY. GIFT OF ~~~~ ~~\\,\\{)~. ';.c. ~old'~hfl(~~-t>--h c!h. '.l!<J.':'i 06~ tf:i~l ~ THE Insect Enemies.of Small Grains. By LA WHENOE BRUNER.. University of' Nebraska. [EXTRACT FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT NEBRASKA STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE FOR 1893.] -, LINCOLN. N -EBRASKA. 1893- ~ 360 NEBRASKA STATE BOARD OF AGRICGLTUltB. REPORT OF THE ENTO"MOLOGIST . .. INSEOT ENEMIES OF THE SMALL GRAINS, BY LAWRENCE BRUNER, UNIVERSITY OF' NEBRASKA. INTRODUCTION. Although "corn is king" in N~braska, our crops of sma.ll grains are not insignificant. The insect enemies of wheat, oats, barley, and rye therefore demand our attention nearly or quite as much as do those which attack corn. Accordingly, during the past year much time has been given to the study of this class of insect pests. While many of the species are identical for the different crops, the nature of the plants themselves being unlike, it necessarily follows that the mode of attack among these ene­ miesmust vary somewhat in each case.
    [Show full text]
  • Zur Verbreitung Und Zur Morphologie Von Mayetiola Destructor (Say, 1817) Kieffer, 1896 (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Beiträge zur Entomologie = Contributions to Entomology Jahr/Year: 1991 Band/Volume: 41 Autor(en)/Author(s): Stelter Helmut, Bielka F. Artikel/Article: Zur Verbreitung und zur Morphologie von Mayetiola destructor (Say, 1817) Kieffer, 1896 (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). 243-249 ©www.senckenberg.de/; download www.contributions-to-entomology.org/ Beitr. Ent. Berlin 41 (1991) 1, S. 243-249 H. Stelter; F. Bielka & D. R othacker 1 Zur Verbreitung und zur Morphologie von Mayetiola destructor (S a y , 1817) K ie f f e r , 1896 (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Mit 6 Abbildungen im Text Synonyme: Tipula cerealis Sauter , 1817 Cecidomyia tritici H ammerschmidt , 1834 Poomyia destructor (Say , 1817) R übsaamen , 1910 Chortomyia (Cecidomyia) secalina (H. Loew, 1859) K ieffer, 1913. Cecidomyia secalina H. Loew , 1859 ist auf einen Irrtum vonF itch zurückzuführen. A. F itch (1845) gibt für die Fühler der Weibchen vonCecidomyia destructor Say (fehlerhaft) gestielte Geißelglieder an. Dies war für H.L oew (1859) Anlaß zur Aufstellung seiner von Secale cereale gezogenen Cecidomyia secalina, bei der die Fühlerglieder der Weibchen natürlich ungestielt sind. Weitere Synonyme notierteBarnes (1956). Einleitung Die Beschreibung der Cecidomyia destructor Say , 1817 erfolgt etwa 30 Jahre nach ihrem ersten verheerenden Auftreten an Weizenbeständen der amerikanischen Ostküste. Im Laufe dieser Zeit hatte sich dort die Vulgärbezeichnung „hessian fly“ eingebürgert. Dieser Name geht auf vermutete Zusammenhänge der Einschleppung mit der Landung der ersten hessischen Truppenkontingente im August 1776 auf Long Island und dem Massenauftreten dieser Mückenart an der Ostküste 1778/79 zurück (sieheFitch , 1845). Eingehend mit den Möglichkeiten der Einschleppung in die USA nach dieser Vorstellung haben sichW agner (1861) und H agen (1880) auseinandergesetzt und belegt, daßM.
    [Show full text]
  • Insectos Y Arácnidos
    Insectos y arácnidos Español English Français abdomen abdomen abdomen abeja bee abeille abeja albañil mason bee abeille maçonne abeja albina albino bee abeille albinos abeja azul de la madera violet carpenter bee abeille charpentière abeja de calzones hairy-legged mining bee abeille à culottes abeja de la arena ashy mining bee abeille des sables abeja doméstica hive bee abeille domestique abeja enana little bee abeille naine abeja europea European honey bee abeille européenne abeja exploradora scout bee abeille chercheuse abeja exploradora searcher bee abeille chercheuse abeja gigante giant bee abeille géante abeja gigante rock bee abeille géante abeja joven house bee jeune abeille abeja lampiña hairless bee abeille glabre abeja limpiadora cleaning bee nettoyeuse abeja melífera honey bee abeille domestique abeja melífera honeybee abeille mellifique abeja pecoreadora flying bee butineuse abeja portadora de agua water carrier bee abeille porteur d'eau abeja reina queen bee abeille reine abejaruco bee-eater guêpier abejilla hornet moth papillon frelon abejilla del álamo y el chopo hornet clearwing sésie-frelon abejorro bumble bee bourdon abejorro bumblebee bourdon abejorro humble bee bourdon abejorro batanero scarred melolontha hanneton foulon abejorro común buff-tailed bumblebee bourdon terrestre abejorro común common cockchafer hanneton commun abejorro de campo common carder-bee bourdon des champs abencerraje false baton blue azuré de la cléonie abencerraje ibérico panoptes blue azuré cordouan acariasis acarine disease acariose ácaro mite
    [Show full text]
  • Insectos Y Arácnidos
    Insectos y arácnidos Français Español English abdomen abdomen abdomen abeille abeja bee abeille à culottes abeja de calzones hairy-legged mining bee abeille albinos abeja albina albino bee abeille charpentière abeja azul de la madera violet carpenter bee abeille chercheuse abeja exploradora scout bee abeille chercheuse abeja exploradora searcher bee abeille des sables abeja de la arena ashy mining bee abeille domestique abeja doméstica hive bee abeille domestique abeja melífera honey bee abeille européenne abeja europea European honey bee abeille géante abeja gigante giant bee abeille géante abeja gigante rock bee abeille glabre abeja lampiña hairless bee abeille maçonne abeja albañil mason bee abeille mellifique abeja melífera honeybee abeille naine abeja enana little bee abeille porteur d'eau abeja portadora de agua water carrier bee abeille reine abeja reina queen bee acarien ácaro mite acarien ácaro traqueal acarine mite acarien à quatre taches arañuela de cuatro manchas four-spotted spider mite acarien à six taches arañuela de seis manchas six-spotted mite acarien bleu de l’avoine ácaro del grano de invierno winter grain mite acarien brun arañuela parda de los frutales pear bryobia acarien brun de l’avocatier arañuela parda del aguacate avocado brown mite acarien de l’aloès ácaro del áloe aloe mite acarien de l’ananas arañuela falsa de la piña pineapple false spider mite acarien de l’érinose de la vigne ácaro de la erinosis de la vid grape erineum mite acarien de l’érinose de la vigne ácaro de la erinosis de la vid vine leaf blister
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of the Seed-Corn Maggot in the Coastal Plain of the South
    ~ I~~ ~ 128 Iii ~ 1I111~ ~ lSi ~II~ Ij,iW 11,1.0 Ij,iliij w II:,j ... ~ ... ~ iii iii ~ ~ ~ ~ I.i ........ .. 1.1 ........ 111111.8 - '"" 1.2: 111111.4 11111 1.6 "'" 1.25 111111.4 111111.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART N~TIONAL BURE.~U Of STANDAR~5-1963-A NATIONAL BUREAU or STANC·ARDS-1963-A D \.lCO~-\ Technical Bulletin No. 723 June 1940 UNITED,S'l'ATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRI(~liLT(JRE W4.~:p:INGTON, D. £. Jliology' of the Seed -Corn Maggot in the ~ '~Coasta\ Plain of the South Atlantic States 1 By W.•J. R~!D, JR. _-:'Assistant entomologist, Division of Truck Crop and Garden Insect Investigatiom, Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine 2 CONTENTS Page Introducti"n.................................... 1 Biolot;iclli studies-Continued History apd di~t~iblltion ••••.•... _ _. ...• .. .. 2 The egg.................................... 10 Systematlr pO<lllOn .••• _.........._...._....... 2 Tho lan·a........................... ....... 13 Desrript'ons or tnr singes...................... :3 'rho pupa.................................. 20 The aduIL......._..••••.••.•_....__ ....... The eg~ __ .. __________ •___ ....__ ~ .. __ .. _______ _ ~ ~~~i~~I~}~·cycie~:·:=:;==:=::::::=:::::::::: ~ 'rhe larva .................................. 51 i\'lmber or ~eneration~.... ........... ..... ~6 The pllPIl ................................. 7 S~u~onfi) QCCUrrenLt) _ ..... _~ ~~ ........ __ oo .... _ __ ____ 36 Host plnnts lI'1U othu larval rood ............... 7 Xatural ('uemi('~~_ .. _____ ~." ___ ._ ..•".", .. _.... _... __ 38
    [Show full text]