Evolution of Gene-Rich Germline Restricted Chromosomes in Black-Winged Fungus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution of Gene-Rich Germline Restricted Chromosomes in Black-Winged Fungus bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.08.430288; this version posted February 9, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Evolution of gene-rich germline restricted chromosomes in black-winged fungus 2 gnats through introgression (Diptera: Sciaridae) 3 Christina N. Hodson1*, Kamil S. Jaron1, Susan Gerbi2, Laura Ross1 4 5 6 1. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK 7 2. Brown University, Division of Biology and Medicine, Providence, RI 02912, USA 8 9 ** corresponding author: Christina Hodson, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of 10 Edinburgh, UK, email: [email protected] 11 12 Short title: Evolution of germline restricted chromosomes in a fly 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.08.430288; this version posted February 9, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 25 Abstract 26 Germline restricted DNA has evolved in diverse animal taXa, and is found in several 27 vertebrate clades, nematodes, and flies. In these lineages, either portions of chromosomes 28 or entire chromosomes are eliminated from somatic cells early in development, restricting 29 portions of the genome to the germline. Little is known about why germline restricted DNA 30 has evolved, especially in flies, in which three diverse families, Chironomidae, 31 Cecidomyiidae, and Sciaridae eXhibit germline restricted chromosomes (GRCs). We 32 conducted a genomic analysis of germline restricted chromosomes in the fungus gnat 33 Bradysia (Sciara) coprophila (Diptera: Sciaridae), which carries two large germline restricted 34 “L” chromosomes. We sequenced and assembled the genome of B. coprophila, and used 35 differences in sequence coverage and k-mer frequency between somatic and germ tissues 36 to identify GRC sequence and compare it to the other chromosomes in the genome. We 37 found that the GRCs in B. coprophila are large, gene-rich, and have many genes with 38 paralogs on other chromosomes in the genome. We also found that the GRC genes are 39 extraordinarily divergent from their paralogs, and have sequence similarity to another 40 Dipteran family (Cecidomyiidae) in phylogenetic analyses, suggesting that these 41 chromosomes have arisen in Sciaridae through introgression from a related lineage. These 42 results suggest that the GRCs may have evolved through an ancient hybridization event, 43 raising questions about how this may have occurred, how these chromosomes became 44 restricted to the germline after introgression, and why they were retained over time. 45 46 Keywords: hybridization, L chromosome, non-Mendelian inheritance, reproduction, 47 programmed DNA elimination, segregation distortion 48 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.08.430288; this version posted February 9, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 49 Introduction 50 An underlying tenet of heredity is that all cells within an organism have the same 51 genomic sequence. However, there are a surprising number of exceptions to this rule. For 52 instance, Boveri [1] noted in Ascaris nematodes that fragments of chromosomes were 53 eliminated from somatic cells early in development, showing that in some cases germline/ 54 soma differentiation involves changes in the genomic composition of cells as well as 55 regulatory changes. In addition to the loss of chromosomal fragments (referred to as 56 “chromatin diminution”), another type of germline specialization involves the elimination of 57 whole chromosomes from somatic cells. A phenomenon we believe this was first noted in 58 the Dipteran gnat Bradysia (Sciara) coprophila [2]. Both chromatin diminution and 59 chromosome elimination are examples of programmed DNA elimination, which occurs in a 60 developmentally regulated manner across a broad evolutionary range from ciliates to 61 mammals, including more than 100 species from nine major taXonomic groups [3]. 62 Programmed DNA elimination is not a rare phenomenon, yet remains poorly understood. 63 Recently, however, genomic studies in several species are beginning to address questions 64 regarding their function and evolution. 65 66 Many eXamples of programmed DNA elimination involve regulated DNA elimination 67 from somatic cells so that portions of the genome are restricted to the germline [3]. Germline 68 restricted DNA, involving either portions of chromosomes (chromatin diminution) or entire 69 chromosomes (chromosome elimination) have evolved repeatedly and are found in 70 lampreys and hagfish (the most basal vertebrates), songbirds, nematodes, and flies [1,4–7]. 71 Recent genomic work on lampreys and nematodes (with chromatin diminution) and 72 songbirds (with chromosome elimination) have found that the germline restricted portions of 73 the genome often carry protein coding genes involved in germ tissue maturation and 74 function [8–11]. Therefore, a leading hypothesis is that germline restricted DNA may help 75 resolve intralocus conflict between the germline and somatic cells [10,12]. However, 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.08.430288; this version posted February 9, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 76 although chromatin diminution and chromosome elimination have similar consequences, the 77 initial evolution of these systems probably differs, as the mechanism of elimination is 78 substantially different in these two systems. 79 80 In species with chromosome elimination, entire chromosomes are eXclusively found 81 in the germline: the germline restricted chromosomes (GRCs). Little is known about how 82 these chromosomes arise and how they are related to the rest of the genome. One 83 hypothesis is that they originate from B chromosomes [13], which are accessory non- 84 essential chromosomes that are widespread in eukaryotes [14]. GRCs are similar to B 85 chromosomes in that they are chromosomes in addition to the core genome (i.e. the 86 chromosomes which are found in the somatic cells as well as the germ cells), with greater 87 variation in presence/number of chromosomes than the core chromosome set. However, 88 while B chromosomes are non-essential, recent genomic work in songbirds suggests that 89 GRCs likely play an important, and perhaps fundamental role in zebra finches [10] and are 90 evolutionarily conserved across songbirds [15]. Furthermore, there is no clear evidence that 91 GRCs spread through drive and therefore unlike B chromosomes most likely persist due to 92 their functional importance, rather than as reproductive parasites. So while it is still possible 93 that GRCs originated from B chromosomes and were subsequently “domesticated”, 94 alternative explanations for their origin cannot be excluded. Especially as the origins of the 95 GRCs have so far only focused on their single origin among birds. Here we focus on a 96 different origin of GRCs; their evolution and origin in flies (Diptera). 97 98 GRCs are found in three dipteran families: the “K” chromosomes of non-biting 99 midges (Chironomidae), the “E” chromosomes of gall gnats (Cecidomyiidae), and the “L” 100 chromosomes of black winged fungus gnats (Sciaridae) [4,16,17]. Each instance appears to 101 have an independent origin, as GRCs show different properties in each lineage, and the 102 three families are not sister clades [18,19]. While the evolutionary origins of these 103 chromosomes remain obscure, GRCs are eXpected to have some function relating to 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.08.430288; this version posted February 9, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 104 reproduction, otherwise, they likely would not have been retained over time. The origin and 105 evolution of GRCs in Sciaridae and Cecidomyiidae are particularly intriguing, as these 106 families are relatively closely related, both belonging to the infraorder Bibionomorpha 107 (although they are not sister clades, [19]). Therefore, understanding how GRCs arose in 108 these two lineages and what factors led to their evolution can provide a foundation from 109 which we can answer many questions. For instance, we can start to unravel why GRCs 110 arose in some Bibionomorpha families but not others, and compare the gene content and 111 expression of GRC genes in two relatively closely related families. 112 113 Although both Sciaridae and Cecidomyiidae carry GRCs, the characteristics of these 114 chromosomes differ between the two families, with Sciaridae carrying few (up to 4) large 115 GRCs, and Cecidomyiidae carrying many (between 16 and 67) small GRCs (reviewed in 116 [18,20]). Therefore, theories for how GRCs arose differ between the two lineages. In 117 Cecidomyiidae, the GRCs show some similarities in appearance to the core genome, and so 118 it was originally proposed that they evolved through whole genome duplications followed by 119 restriction of the duplicated chromosomes to the germline [21,22]. However, this idea 120 remains controversial and lacks empirical support. In Sciaridae, however, a comprehensive 121 theory for the evolution of GRCs suggests that the GRCs evolved from the X chromosome in 122 a series of conflicts between different parts of the genome [23].
Recommended publications
  • PAEDOGENESIS in ERISTALIS ARBUSTORUM
    PAEDOGENESIS in ERISTALIS ARBUSTORUM Bart Achterkamp, under supervision of dr. Mart M. Ottenheim, dr. Leo W. Beukeboom and prof.dr. Paul M. Brakefield Section Evolutionary Biology and Section Animal Ecology, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences Leiden University M. Sc. Thesis 1999 PAEDOGENESIS in Eristalis arbustorum (Diptera: Syrphidae) Sum mary Paedogenesisis the reproduction by larvae or juveniles. In insects this form of reproduction is known from one beetle, several species of gall midges and possibly Erisalishoverfiies.This study aims to show paedogenesis forE. arbuslorum under controlled conditions. The first two experiments were unsuccessful. In the third experiment, a total of 1266 larvae were reared and five occasions of paedogenesis were recorded among 542 successful pupations. In all cases of paedogenesis, one larva was put in the container and two larvae or pupae were collected later. The life history consequences of this way of reproduction are discussed. "Now don't forget. Gorold .THIS time punch some holes in the lid!" 2 I cunvrt(': BiBLIOTHEEK RU GRONINGEN 30 — * i7DOAA H"'t IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIII 217Q70R4 D67 INTRODUCTION .4 1.1 Life history .4 1.2 Terminology 5 1.3 Bisexual or parthenogenetic reproduction9 8 1 .4 Paedogenesis in non-insect animals 8 1.4.1 Phylum Hydrozoa 8 1.4.2 Phylum Platyhelminthes 9 1.4.3 Phylum Arthropoda: Rhizocephalan barnacles 9 1.4.4 Phylum Echinodermata 9 1.4.5 Paedogenetic salamanders 10 1.5 Paedogenesis in insects 11 1.5.1 Paedogenesis in Hemiptera 11 1.5.2 Paedogenesis
    [Show full text]
  • R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past
    Swallow 3 Spotted Flytcatcher 28 *Jackdaw I Pied Flycatcher 5 Blue Tit I Dunnock 2 Wren 2 Meadow Pipit 10 Song Thrush 7 Pied Wagtail 4 Redwing 4 Woodchat Shrike 1 Blackbird 60 Red-backed Shrike 1 Stonechat 2 Starling 15 Redstart 7 Greenfinch 5 Black Redstart I Goldfinch 1 Robin I9 Linnet 8 Grasshopper Warbler 2 Chaffinch 47 Reed Warbler 1 House Sparrow 16 Sedge Warbler 14 *Jackdaw is new to the Lundy ringing list. RECOVERIES OF RINGED BIRDS Guillemot GM I9384 ringed 5.6.67 adult found dead Eastbourne 4.12.76. Guillemot GP 95566 ringed 29.6.73 pullus found dead Woolacombe, Devon 8.6.77 Starling XA 92903 ringed 20.8.76 found dead Werl, West Holtun, West Germany 7.10.77 Willow Warbler 836473 ringed 14.4.77 controlled Portland, Dorset 19.8.77 Linnet KC09559 ringed 20.9.76 controlled St Agnes, Scilly 20.4.77 RINGED STRANGERS ON LUNDY Manx Shearwater F.S 92490 ringed 4.9.74 pullus Skokholm, dead Lundy s. Light 13.5.77 Blackbird 3250.062 ringed 8.9.75 FG Eksel, Belgium, dead Lundy 16.1.77 Willow Warbler 993.086 ringed 19.4.76 adult Calf of Man controlled Lundy 6.4.77 THE DIPTERA (TWO-WINGED FLffiS) OF LUNDY ISLAND R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 The Diptera of Lundy have been poorly studied in the past. Therefore, it is hoped that the production of an annotated checklist, giving an indication of the habits and general distribution of the species recorded will encourage other entomologists to take an interest in the Diptera of Lundy.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Noteworthy Findings of Fungus Gnats from Finland and Northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae)
    Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1068 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068 Taxonomic paper Recent noteworthy findings of fungus gnats from Finland and northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae) Jevgeni Jakovlev†, Jukka Salmela ‡,§, Alexei Polevoi|, Jouni Penttinen ¶, Noora-Annukka Vartija# † Finnish Environment Insitutute, Helsinki, Finland ‡ Metsähallitus (Natural Heritage Services), Rovaniemi, Finland § Zoological Museum, University of Turku, Turku, Finland | Forest Research Institute KarRC RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia ¶ Metsähallitus (Natural Heritage Services), Jyväskylä, Finland # Toivakka, Myllyntie, Finland Corresponding author: Jukka Salmela ([email protected]) Academic editor: Vladimir Blagoderov Received: 10 Feb 2014 | Accepted: 01 Apr 2014 | Published: 02 Apr 2014 Citation: Jakovlev J, Salmela J, Polevoi A, Penttinen J, Vartija N (2014) Recent noteworthy findings of fungus gnats from Finland and northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1068. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068 Abstract New faunistic data on fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaroidea excluding Sciaridae) from Finland and NW Russia (Karelia and Murmansk Region) are presented. A total of 64 and 34 species are reported for the first time form Finland and Russian Karelia, respectively. Nine of the species are also new for the European fauna: Mycomya shewelli Väisänen, 1984,M. thula Väisänen, 1984, Acnemia trifida Zaitzev, 1982, Coelosia gracilis Johannsen, 1912, Orfelia krivosheinae Zaitzev, 1994, Mycetophila biformis Maximova, 2002, M. monstera Maximova, 2002, M. uschaica Subbotina & Maximova, 2011 and Trichonta palustris Maximova, 2002. Keywords Sciaroidea, Fennoscandia, faunistics © Jakovlev J et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • I Ohten Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Allgemeine Und Angewandte Entomologie E.V., Ulm 6
    i ohten Deutsche Gesellschaft für allgemeine und angewandte Entomologie e.V., Ulm 6. Jahrgang, Heft 1 ISSN 0931-4873 Februar 1992 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS AUS DEN ARBEITSKREISEN: AK "Nutzarthropoden", S. 2; AK "Dipteren", S. 13; Ankündigungen der AKe "Dipteren", S. 20; Einladung AK "Nutzarthropoden", S. 21; Einladung AK "Epigäische Raubarthropoden", S. 22; ÜBERSICHTEN ÜBER ENTOMOLOGISCHE ARBEITSGRUPPEN: Limnologische Flußstation Schlitz des MPI für Limnologie, S. 23; BITTE UM MITARBEIT (Staphylinidologen), S. 28; TAGUNGEN, S. 30; GESELLSCHAFTSNACHRICHTEN: Meigen-Medaille, S. 32; Neue Mitglieder, S. 37; Ehrenmitglieder, S. 38; Austritte 1991 und in 1991 ver- storbene Mitglieder, S. 38; Spendenbescheinigung, S. 39; Anschriftenänderun- gen; Mitgliedsbeiträge, Konten, Impressum, S. 40. !!! Studentische Mitglieder !!! Bitte unbedingt eine Studienbescheinigung an den Kassenwart senden, sofern nicht bereits im Wintersemester 1991/1992 geschehen. Wenn keine Studienbe- scheinigung vorliegt, muß der volle Mitgliedsbeitrag berechnet werden. Bitte beachten: Neue Anschrift des Kassenwartes: Dr. Paul Bernhard Koch Aligemeine Zoologie (Biologie I) Albert-Einstein-Allee 11 7900 Ulm Tel. 0731/502-2600, FAX 0731/502-2038 AUS DEN ARBEITSKREISEN Arbeitskreis "Nutzarthropoden" Die 10. Tagung des Arbeitskreises "Nutzarthropoden" fand am 18. und 19. Sep- tember 1991 im Landwirtschaftsamt, Karlsruhe-Durlach (Augustenberg) statt. Gastgeber waren Herr Amtsleiter A. BEEG und Herr P. DETZEL, Beratungsdienst "Nützlingseinsatz". Ungefähr 50 Kollegen nahmen Teil. Dabei wurden
    [Show full text]
  • Malaise-Hyönteispyynti Lapin Suojelualueilla 2012–2014
    Jukka Salmela, Stefan Siivonen, Patrycja Dominiak, Antti Haarto, Kai Heller, Juhani Kanervo, Petri Martikainen, Matti Mäkilä, Lauri Paasivirta, Aki Rinne, Juha Salokannel, Guy Söderman ja Pekka Vilkamaa Malaise-hyönteispyynti Lapin suojelualueilla 2012–2014 Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja. Sarja A 221 Jukka Salmela, Metsähallitus, Lapin luontopalvelut, jukka.salmela(at)metsa.fi Stefan Siivonen, Metsähallitus, Lapin luontopalvelut, stefan.siivonen(at)metsa.fi Patrycja Dominiak, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, University of Gdansk, heliocopris(at)gmail.com Antti Haarto, Mietoinen, ahaarto(at)gmail.com Kai Heller, Quickborn, kaiheller(at)gmx.de Juhani Kanervo, Turku, jussi.kanervo(at)luukku.com Petri Martikainen, Juva, petri.martikainen(at)uef.fi Matti Mäkilä, Rovaniemi, makila.entomology(at)gmail.com Lauri Paasivirta, Salo, lauri.paasivirta(at)suomi24.fi Aki Rinne, Helsinki, aki.rinne(at)pintakasittelytekniikka.fi Juha Salokannel, Tampere, juha.salokannel(at)gmail.com Guy Söderman, Helsinki, guy.soderman(at)pp.inet.fi Pekka Vilkamaa, Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Helsingin yliopisto, pekka.vilkamaa(at)helsinki.fi Kansikuva: Malaise-pyydys Pallas–Yllästunturin kansallispuiston Röyninkurussa 2013. Lähteisten latvapurojen varret, varsinkin sellaiset joita ympäröi luonnontilainen havu- metsä, ovat monimuotoisia elinympäristöjä. Tältä paikalta havaittiin mm. Euroopalle uusi sienissääskilaji Mycetophila monstera, erittäin harvinainen pikkuvaaksiainen ou- taruskokirsikäs (Limonia messaurea) ja pohjoinen surviaissääski
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Rests with Its Author
    University of Bath PHD Paedogenetic reproduction in Mycophila speyeri and Heteropeza pygmaea (Cecidomyiidae, Diptera) Hunt, Justine L. Award date: 1996 Awarding institution: University of Bath Link to publication Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 11. Oct. 2021 Paedogenetic Reproduction in Mycophila speyeri and Heteropeza pygmaea (Ceeidomyiidae, Diptera). Submitted by Justine L. Hunt for the degree of PhD. of the University of Bath, 1996. Copyright Attention is drawn to the fact that the copyright of this thesis rests with its author. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names
    Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus-group names. Part V Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart Evenhuis, Neal L.; Pape, Thomas; Pont, Adrian C. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Evenhuis, N. L., Pape, T., & Pont, A. C. (2016). Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus- group names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart. Magnolia Press. Zootaxa Vol. 4172 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Zootaxa 4172 (1): 001–211 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22128906-32FA-4A80-85D6-10F114E81A7B ZOOTAXA 4172 Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart NEAL L. EVENHUIS1, THOMAS PAPE2 & ADRIAN C. PONT3 1 J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Entomological Research, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-2704, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by D. Whitmore: 15 Aug. 2016; published: 30 Sept. 2016 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 NEAL L.
    [Show full text]
  • Bradysia Difformis Frey and Bradysia Ocellaris (Comstock): Two
    SYSTEMATICS Bradysia difformis Frey and Bradysia ocellaris (Comstock): Two Additional Neotropical Species of Black Fungus Gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) of Economic Importance: A Redescription and Review 1 2 FRANK MENZEL, JANE E. SMITH, AND NELSON B. COLAUTO Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, ZALF e.V., PF 100238, D-16202 Eberswalde, Germany Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 96(4): 448Ð457 (2003) ABSTRACT The Þrst records for Brazil of two sciarid species, Bradysia difformis Frey, 1948 [ϭ paupera (Tuomikoski, 1960)] and Bradysia ocellaris (Comstock, 1882) [ϭ tritici (Coquillett, 1895)] (Diptera, Sciaridae) are presented. These are the Þrst records of these species for the Neotropical region. Males and females of both species are fully described and illustrated. Information is given about synonymy and the location of the type material. Bradysia agrestis Sasakawa, 1978 is a new synonym of Bradysia difformis. Information about the zoogeographic distribution and habitats, of Bradysia difformis and Bradysia ocellaris is provided. KEY WORDS Diptera, sciaridae, Bradysia difformis Frey, Bradysia ocellaris (Comstock), descrip- tions, new synonym, new records, mushroom pests THE DIPTEROUS FAMILY SCIARIDAE (Black Fungus Gnats) signiÞcant losses in crop production (Menzel and is found on every continent and is characterized by its Mohrig 2000). high number of species and individuals. According to Some species belonging to Bradysia Winnertz, a species inventory by Menzel and Mohrig (2000), 1867 s. l. [species group of the Bradysia amoena (Win- Ͼ1,700 valid species have been described in the world. nertz, 1867) species group], and Lycoriella Frey, 1948 Despite their ecological importance, these micro- s. str. are common pests in mushroom cultures and in Diptera have largely been neglected because of their glasshouses (Binns 1976; Menzel and Mohrig 2000; small body size (1Ð7 mm), their often cryptic mode of White et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Role of Bradysia Impatiens (Diptera: Sciaridae) As a Vector Transmitting Peanut Stunt Virus on the Model Plant Nicotiana Benthamiana
    cells Article Analysis of the Role of Bradysia impatiens (Diptera: Sciaridae) as a Vector Transmitting Peanut Stunt Virus on the Model Plant Nicotiana benthamiana Marta Budziszewska, Patryk Fr ˛ackowiak and Aleksandra Obr˛epalska-St˛eplowska* Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Władysława W˛egorka20, 60-318 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (P.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract: Bradysia species, commonly known as fungus gnats, are ubiquitous in greenhouses, nurs- eries of horticultural plants, and commercial mushroom houses, causing significant economic losses. Moreover, the insects from the Bradysia genus have a well-documented role in plant pathogenic fungi transmission. Here, a study on the potential of Bradysia impatiens to acquire and transmit the peanut stunt virus (PSV) from plant to plant was undertaken. Four-day-old larvae of B. impatiens were exposed to PSV-P strain by feeding on virus-infected leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana and then transferred to healthy plants in laboratory conditions. Using the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), real-time PCR (RT-qPCR), and digital droplet PCR (RT-ddPCR), the PSV RNAs in the larva, pupa, and imago of B. impatiens were detected and quantified. The presence of PSV Citation: Budziszewska, M.; genomic RNA strands as well as viral coat protein in N. benthamiana, on which the viruliferous larvae Fr ˛ackowiak,P.; were feeding, was also confirmed at the molecular level, even though the characteristic symptoms of Obr˛epalska-St˛eplowska,A.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information for Evolution of Gene-Rich Germline Restricted
    1 Supplementary Information for Evolution of gene-rich germline restricted 2 chromosomes in black-winged fungus gnats through introgression (Diptera: 3 Sciaridae) 4 Christina N. Hodson, Kamil S. Jaron, Susan Gerbi, Laura Ross 5 6 Supplementary Text 1: Detailed description of the chromosome inheritance system in 7 Bradysia coprophila. 8 9 The chromosome system in B. coprophila, and in sciarids generally, is unique in 10 several ways including chromosome transmission patterns, sex determination, and the 11 presence of GRCs (see Fig 1 for transmission patterns). All sciarids studied to date have a 12 system of reproduction known as paternal genome elimination, where males only transmit 13 maternally inherited chromosomes to offspring [1,2]. Paternal genome elimination has 14 evolved independently in at least seven arthropod lineages, including the related gall gnat 15 family Cecidomyiidae [3]. In all species with paternal genome elimination, meiosis occurs in 16 a Mendelian manner in females, but in males meiosis is aberrant. In male meiosis in 17 sciarids, there is a monopolar spindle in meiosis I. Maternally inherited chromosomes move 18 towards the monopolar spindle, while paternally derived chromosomes move away from it 19 and are discarded in a bud of cytoplasm [2]. Thus, only the maternal complement of 20 chromosomes is transmitted to the sperm. This phenomenon in B. coprophila was the first 21 example of “imprinting”, to our knowledge, by which the cell recognizes the maternal or 22 paternal origin of a chromosome [4]. Interestingly, the GRCs always segregate with the 23 maternal set of chromosomes. Therefore, all of the GRCs (typically two in B.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungus Gnats
    Евразиатский энтомол. журнал 16(2): 119–128 © EUROASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2017 Fungus gnats (Diptera: Bolitophilidae, Diadocidiidae, Keroplatidae, Mycetophilidae) of the lower course of Anadyr River, Chukotskii Autonomnyi Okrug, Russia Ãðèáíûå êîìàðû (Diptera, Syrphidae) íèçîâèé ðåêè Àíàäûðü (×óêîòñêèé àâòîíîìíûé îêðóã, Ðîññèÿ) A.V. Polevoi*, A.V. Barkalov** À.Â. Ïîëåâîé*, À.Â. Áàðêàëîâ** * Forest Research Institute, Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushkinskaya Str. 11, Petrozavodsk 185910 Russia. E-mail: [email protected]. * Институт леса КарНЦ РАН, ул. Пушкинская 11, Петрозаводск, 185910, Россия. E-mail: [email protected] ** Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Frunze Str. 11, Novosibirsk 630091 Russia. E-mail: [email protected]. ** Институт систематики и экологии животных СО РАН, ул. Фрунзе 11, Новосибирск 630091 Россия. Key words: fauna, fungus gnats, Anadyr River, Chukotka. Ключевые слова: фауна, грибные комары, река Анадырь, Чукотка. Abstract. The first data on the Fungus gnats fauna of Diadocidiidae, Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae and Myceto- Chukotka are presented. 170 species belonging to the fami- philidae, belonging to the superfamily Sciaroidea (Diptera, lies Bolitophilidae, Diadocidiidae, Keroplatidae and Myce- Nematocera, Bibionomorpha). This is highly diverse group tophilidae were reported during two field seasons in 2013 with estimated number of species around 4500 in the and 2014 in the lower course of the Anadyr River. Eight world fauna and more than 1450 in Palaearctic [Søli et al., species are reported from Russia for the first time, two species are new for the Palaearctic and 27 species were 2000]. In the latter region, they seem to display an in- previously unknown in the eastern part of the Palaearctic; creasing diversity towards the North, with most species- 28 species are most probably undescribed taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Gall Midges from the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Hans Roskam & Sébastien Carbonnelle
    annotated checklist of the gall midges from the netherlands, belgium and luxembourg (diptera: cecidomyiidae) Hans Roskam & Sébastien Carbonnelle The gall midges are one of the most important groups of gall makers. Emerging larvae produce stimuli and the host plant responds by producing galls, fascinating structures which provide food and shelter for the developing larvae. Most gall inducing midges are host specific: they are only able to induce galls in a few, often related, plant species. A few species have different feeding modes: among them are saprophagous, fungivorous and predaceous species and some are used in biocontrol. We recorded 416 species in the whole area; 366 species are recorded from the Netherlands, 270 species from Belgium and 96 species from Luxembourg. importance, in the 8th volume in the series by introduction Barnes (1946-1969) and published eleven papers Over more than a century M.W. Beijerinck (1851- (1957-1999) on gall midges new for the Dutch 1931), J.C.H. de Meijere (1866-1947) and W.M. fauna, and, last but not least, was responsible for Docters van Leeuwen (1880-1960) wrote impor- the cecidomyiids in the Checklist of the Diptera tant papers about plant galls in the Netherlands. of the Netherlands by Beuk (2002). Nijveldt’s Dutch checklists of Diptera started with Bennet collection of microscope slides, more than 5,600 & van Olivier (1825, with all species placed in specimens, 4,300 of Dutch origin, mainly collected Tipula). Checklists of cecidomyiids were started by, by himself, but also by De Meijere and Van der e.g., Van der Wulp (1859, 18 spp.), Van der Wulp Wulp during the second half of the 19th, and first & De Meijere (1898, 63 spp.) and De Meijere half of the 20th century, and also included in the (1939), with many supplements (e.g., De Meijere Naturalis collection, is a second main reference 1946).
    [Show full text]