Thesis Rests with Its Author

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thesis Rests with Its Author University of Bath PHD Paedogenetic reproduction in Mycophila speyeri and Heteropeza pygmaea (Cecidomyiidae, Diptera) Hunt, Justine L. Award date: 1996 Awarding institution: University of Bath Link to publication Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 11. Oct. 2021 Paedogenetic Reproduction in Mycophila speyeri and Heteropeza pygmaea (Ceeidomyiidae, Diptera). Submitted by Justine L. Hunt for the degree of PhD. of the University of Bath, 1996. Copyright Attention is drawn to the fact that the copyright of this thesis rests with its author. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. This thesis may be made available for consultation within the University Library and may be photocopied or lent to other libraries for the purpose of consultation. UMI Number: U092157 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U092157 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 LIBRARY Contents Abstract 1 Chapter 1 Introduction: The Paedogenetic Cecidomyiidae 1.1 The Cecidomyiidae 3 1.2 External morphology of the larvae 3 1.3 Gall midge biology 4 1.4.1 Mushroom production 6 1.4.2 Pests of mushroom crops 8 1.4.3 Cecids as pests of mushrooms 9 1.5 Paedogenesis 12 1.5.1 Paedogenetic reproductive system 13 1.5.2 Oogenesis 15 1.5.3 Nurse chamber formation 16 1.5.4 Oocyte-nurse chamber complex 17 1.5.5 Follicular epithelium 18 1.5.6 Embryogenesis 19 1.5.7 Chromosomes 21 1.6 Spermatogenesis 24 1.7 Lifecycles 24 1.8 Environmental control of life cycles 25 1.9 Hormonal control of life cycles 25 1.10 Larval nutrition 27 Chapter 2 Observations onMycophila speyeri and Heteropeza pygmaea 2.1 Introduction 28 2.1.1 Life cycles 28 2.1.2 Mycophila speyeri 28 2.1.3 Heteropeza pygmaea 32 2.1.4 Other species 33 2.1.5 Description of different sexes 34 2.1.6 Culture techniques 35 2.1.7 History of in vitro culture 36 2.2 Materials and methods 36 2.2.1 Culture of Mycophila speyeri and Heteropeza pygmaea 38 2.2.2 Fixing and sectioning for light microscopy 38 2.2.3 Culture of ovaries, follicles and embryos 39 2.3 Results 42 2.3.1 Lifecycles 44 2.3.2 Mycophila speyeri 44 2.3.3 Heteropeza pygmaea 50 2.3.4 Follicle and ovarian development 52 2.3.5 In vitro culture of ovaries, follicles and embryos 54 2.4 Discussion 62 Chapter 3 Environmental Control of Development and Reproduction 3.1 Introduction 68 3.1.2 Sex determination 68 3.1.3 Factors influencing sex determination 70 3.1.4 Developmental fate 72 3.1.5 Introduction to experiments 73 3.2 Materials and methods ' 74 3.2.1 The influence of nutrition on sex determination in Mycophila speyeri 74 3.2.2 The culture of Mycophila speyeri on defined medium 74 3.2.3 The effect of temperature on the growth of Mycophila speyeri 75 3.2.4 The effect of fungal species on the growth of Mycophila speyeri 75 3.2.5 The effect of crowding on the growth of Mycophila speyeri 76 3.3 Results 78 3.3.1 The influence of nutrition on sex determination in Mycophila speyeri 78 3.3.2 The culture of Mycophila speyeri on defmed medium 79 3.3.3 The effect of temperature on the growth of Mycophila speyeri 82 3.3.4 The effect of fungal species on the growth of Mycophila speyeri 83 3.3.5 The effect of crowding on the growth of Mycophila speyeri 86 3.4 Discussion 89 iii Chapter 4 Endocrine Control of Reproduction 4.1 Introduction 92 4.1.1 Insect developmental hormones 92 4.1.2 Production of hormones 92 4.1.3 Juveniie hormone 96 4.1.4 Ecdy steroids 97 4.1.5 Hormonal control of reproduction 98 4.1.6 Insect growth regulators 99 4.1.7 Role of hormones in cecid development 102 4.1.8 Alternative ecdysteroids 105 4.1.9 Aims 108 4.2 Materials and methods 110 4.2.1 Treatment of insects with hormones and insect growth regulators 110 4.2.2 Identification of dietary sterol 111 4.2.3 Sterol and ecdysteroid extraction from insect tissue 112 4.2.4 Identification of sterols using GC-MS 114 4.2.5 Identification of insect ecdysteroid using HPLC-RIA 115 4.3 Results 118 4.3.1 Treatment of cecids with hormone analogues 118 4.3.2 Identification of dietary sterol from GC-MS - 121 4.3.3 Identification of insect sterols from GC-MS 122 4.3.4 Identification of ecdysteroid from insect tissue 123 4.4 Discussion 142 Chapter 5 Larval Nutrition 5.1 Introduction 146 5.1.1 Viviparity 146 5.1.2 Larval nutrition in the Cecidomyiidae 147 5.1.3 Vitellogenesis 150 5.1.4 Fat body 154 5.1.5 Fat bodies in the Cecidomyiidae 160 5.1.6 Role of the fat body in vitellogenesis 162 5.2 Materials and methods 165 5.2.1 Ultrastructural study of the fat bodies of Mycophila speyeri 165 5.2.2 Insect tissue preparation and protein content determination 166 5.2.3 SDS-PAGE of insect tissue samples 167 5.2.4 Observations of fat bodies in vitro 168 5.3 Results 170 5.3.1 Fixation 170 5.3.2 Ultrastructural study of the fat body tissue of Mycophila speyeri 170 5.3.2.1 Observations of cytoplasmic structure at different stages 172 5.3.2.2 General observations 175 5.3.3 Insect tissue preparation and protein content determination 179 5.3.4 Minigels of all parts of the insect 180 5.3.5 Observations of fat bodies in vitro 182 5.4 Discussion 203 Chapter 6 General Discussion 210 Appendix 1 Leatham’s medium 216 Appendix 2 Solutions for electron microscopy preparation 218 Appendix 3 Lowry protein assay for microplates ' 219 Appendix 4 SDS-PAGE 220 Appendix 5 RIA of free ecdysteroids 221 References 222 v List of Figures. Figure Page number 1.1 Cultivated mushroom infested with Mycophila speyeri 11 2.1 Life cycle of Mycophila speyeri 29 2.2 Life cycle of Heteropeza pygmaea 31 2.3 Petri dish containing 2% malt-extractagar, inoculated with Chondrostereum purpureum and Mycophila speyeri 43 2.4 Diagramatic representation of the life cycle of Mycophila speyeri and Heteropeza pygmaea at Bath. 45 2.5 Day 1, paedogenetic, Mycophila speyeri larva 47 2.6 Day 3, paedogenetic, Mycophila speyeri larva 47 2.7 Day 5, paedogenetic, Mycophila speyeri larva 47 2.8 Mother larva with offspring emerging 48 2.9 Day 3, paedogenetic, Heteropeza pygmaea larva 48 2.10 Pre-pupal Mycophila speyeri larva 49 2.11 Mycophila speyeri pupa 49 2.12 Mycophila speyeri adult 49 2.13 Longitudinal section through day 3 Mycophila speyeri larva 55 2.14 Longitudinal section through day 3 Mycophila speyeri larva , 55 2.15 Transverse section through a day 2 Mycophila speyeri larva 56 2.16 Transverse section through a day 4 Mycophila speyeri larva 56 2.18 Mycophila speyeri embryo at 24 hours 57 2.19 Mycophila speyeri fat body cells at day 5 57 2.20 Egg follicles from a newly emergedMycophila speyeri larva 59 2.21 Individual eggs from 24 hour old Mycophila speyeri larva 59 2.22 Embryos from a day 2 Mycophila speyeri larva 60 2.23 Embryos from a day 2 Mycophila speyeri larva after 24 hours in culture 60 2.24 Embryos from a day 3 Mycophila speyeri larva 61 2.25 Embryos from a day 5 Mycophila speyeri larva 61 4.1 A generalised scheme for side chain dealkylation of phytosterols in insects 106 vi 4.2 Graph showing, fractions from cecid ecdysteroid sample exhibiting ecdysone-like immunoreactivity 124 4.2b Total ion current for sterol sample extracted from C. purpureum 132 4.3 Mass spectrum for peak 1; ergosta-5,7,22-trien-3(3-ol 133 4.4 Mass spectrum for peak 2; ergosta-7.22-dien-3P-ol 134 4.5 Mass spectrum for peak 3; ergosta-5.7-dien-P-ol 135 4.6 Mass spectrum for peak 4; ergosta-7-en-3p-ol 136 4.7 Total ion current for Heteropeza pygmaea sterol sample 137 4.8 Reconstructed ion current Heteropeza pygmaea sterol sample 138 4.9 Mass spectrum for ergosterol from Heteropeza pygmaea sterol sample 139 4.10 Mass spectrum for sterol from Heteropeza pygmaea sterol sample: cholesta-5,7,22-3P-ol 140 4.11 HPLC trace from Heteropeza pygmaea ecdysteroid sample 141 5.1 Mycophila speyeri embryo fat body cells 184 5.2 Mycophila speyeri embryo fat body cells 184 5.3 Mycophila speyeri embryo fat body cells 185 5.4 Mycophila speyeri embryo fat body cells 185 5.5 Day 1, Mycophila speyeri fat body cells 186 5.6 Day 1, Mycophila
Recommended publications
  • PAEDOGENESIS in ERISTALIS ARBUSTORUM
    PAEDOGENESIS in ERISTALIS ARBUSTORUM Bart Achterkamp, under supervision of dr. Mart M. Ottenheim, dr. Leo W. Beukeboom and prof.dr. Paul M. Brakefield Section Evolutionary Biology and Section Animal Ecology, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences Leiden University M. Sc. Thesis 1999 PAEDOGENESIS in Eristalis arbustorum (Diptera: Syrphidae) Sum mary Paedogenesisis the reproduction by larvae or juveniles. In insects this form of reproduction is known from one beetle, several species of gall midges and possibly Erisalishoverfiies.This study aims to show paedogenesis forE. arbuslorum under controlled conditions. The first two experiments were unsuccessful. In the third experiment, a total of 1266 larvae were reared and five occasions of paedogenesis were recorded among 542 successful pupations. In all cases of paedogenesis, one larva was put in the container and two larvae or pupae were collected later. The life history consequences of this way of reproduction are discussed. "Now don't forget. Gorold .THIS time punch some holes in the lid!" 2 I cunvrt(': BiBLIOTHEEK RU GRONINGEN 30 — * i7DOAA H"'t IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIII 217Q70R4 D67 INTRODUCTION .4 1.1 Life history .4 1.2 Terminology 5 1.3 Bisexual or parthenogenetic reproduction9 8 1 .4 Paedogenesis in non-insect animals 8 1.4.1 Phylum Hydrozoa 8 1.4.2 Phylum Platyhelminthes 9 1.4.3 Phylum Arthropoda: Rhizocephalan barnacles 9 1.4.4 Phylum Echinodermata 9 1.4.5 Paedogenetic salamanders 10 1.5 Paedogenesis in insects 11 1.5.1 Paedogenesis in Hemiptera 11 1.5.2 Paedogenesis
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Gall Midges from the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Hans Roskam & Sébastien Carbonnelle
    annotated checklist of the gall midges from the netherlands, belgium and luxembourg (diptera: cecidomyiidae) Hans Roskam & Sébastien Carbonnelle The gall midges are one of the most important groups of gall makers. Emerging larvae produce stimuli and the host plant responds by producing galls, fascinating structures which provide food and shelter for the developing larvae. Most gall inducing midges are host specific: they are only able to induce galls in a few, often related, plant species. A few species have different feeding modes: among them are saprophagous, fungivorous and predaceous species and some are used in biocontrol. We recorded 416 species in the whole area; 366 species are recorded from the Netherlands, 270 species from Belgium and 96 species from Luxembourg. importance, in the 8th volume in the series by introduction Barnes (1946-1969) and published eleven papers Over more than a century M.W. Beijerinck (1851- (1957-1999) on gall midges new for the Dutch 1931), J.C.H. de Meijere (1866-1947) and W.M. fauna, and, last but not least, was responsible for Docters van Leeuwen (1880-1960) wrote impor- the cecidomyiids in the Checklist of the Diptera tant papers about plant galls in the Netherlands. of the Netherlands by Beuk (2002). Nijveldt’s Dutch checklists of Diptera started with Bennet collection of microscope slides, more than 5,600 & van Olivier (1825, with all species placed in specimens, 4,300 of Dutch origin, mainly collected Tipula). Checklists of cecidomyiids were started by, by himself, but also by De Meijere and Van der e.g., Van der Wulp (1859, 18 spp.), Van der Wulp Wulp during the second half of the 19th, and first & De Meijere (1898, 63 spp.) and De Meijere half of the 20th century, and also included in the (1939), with many supplements (e.g., De Meijere Naturalis collection, is a second main reference 1946).
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Sapro-Mycophagous Cecidomyiids (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Korea
    Entomological Research Bulletin 33(2): 115-117 (2017) Insect diversity Checklist of Sapro-mycophagous Cecidomyiids (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Korea Daseul Ham and Yeon Jae Bae* Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Korea *Correspondence Abstract Yeon Jae Bae, Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, A revised checklist of the Korean sapro-mycophagous cecidomyiids is provided. College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Anaretella defecta (Winnertz), Lestremia cinerea Macquart, Lestremia leucophaea Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk- (Meigen), Coccopsilis marginata (Meijere), Divellepidosis rotundata (Yukawa), gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea E-mail: [email protected] Divellepidosis separata (Yukawa), and Stomatocolpodia decussata (Yukawa) are added to the Korean sapro-mycophagous cecidomyiid fauna and Peromyia spinosa Received 10 November 2017 Jaschhof is moved to the subfamily Micromyinae from Lestremiinae. Accepted 15 November 2017 Key words: checklist, Korean sapro-mycophagous cecidomyiids Introduction based on previous taxonomic studies and checklists of Kore- an sapro-mycophagous cecidomyiids (ESK & KSAE 1994, Members of the gall midge family Cecidomyiidae are tiny Lee & Kim 2003, Paek et al. 2010, Shin et al. 2011, Ham & and fragile midges, ranging 0.5-3 mm in body length, rare- Bae 2016a, 2016b). Twelve species of Korean sapro-myco- ly larger than 8 mm (Oosterbroek & Hurkmans 2006). They phagous cecidomyiids belonging to 8 genera and 3 subfam- can be divided into three groups, phytophagous, predaceous, ilies are listed in this study. Further taxonomic studies are and sapro-mycophagous gall midges, based on feeding hab- needed not only to add Korean sapro-mycophagous cecido- its of larvae (Yukawa 1971, Harris 2004a).
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX G. Bibliography of ECOTOX Open Literature
    APPENDIX G. Bibliography of ECOTOX Open Literature Explanation of OPP Acceptability Criteria and Rejection Codes for ECOTOX Data Studies located and coded into ECOTOX must meet acceptability criteria, as established in the Interim Guidance of the Evaluation Criteria for Ecological Toxicity Data in the Open Literature, Phase I and II, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, July 16, 2004. Studies that do not meet these criteria are designated in the bibliography as “Accepted for ECOTOX but not OPP.” The intent of the acceptability criteria is to ensure data quality and verifiability. The criteria parallel criteria used in evaluating registrant-submitted studies. Specific criteria are listed below, along with the corresponding rejection code. · The paper does not report toxicology information for a chemical of concern to OPP; (Rejection Code: NO COC) • The article is not published in English language; (Rejection Code: NO FOREIGN) • The study is not presented as a full article. Abstracts will not be considered; (Rejection Code: NO ABSTRACT) • The paper is not publicly available document; (Rejection Code: NO NOT PUBLIC (typically not used, as any paper acquired from the ECOTOX holding or through the literature search is considered public) • The paper is not the primary source of the data; (Rejection Code: NO REVIEW) • The paper does not report that treatment(s) were compared to an acceptable control; (Rejection Code: NO CONTROL) • The paper does not report an explicit duration of exposure; (Rejection Code: NO DURATION) • The paper does not report a concurrent environmental chemical concentration/dose or application rate; (Rejection Code: NO CONC) • The paper does not report the location of the study (e.g., laboratory vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomology I
    MZO-08 Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Entomology I MZO-08 Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Entomology I Course Development Committee Chair Person Prof. Ashok Sharma Prof. L.R.Gurjar Vice-Chancellor Director (Academic) Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Coordinator and Members Convener SANDEEP HOODA Assistant Professor of Zoology School of Science & Technology Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Members Prof . (Rtd.) Dr. D.P. Jaroli Prof. (Rtd.) Dr. Reena Mathur Professor Emeritus Former Head Department of Zoology Department of Zoology University of Rajasthan, Jaipur University of Rajasthan, Jaipur Prof. (Rtd.) Dr. S.C. Joshi Prof. (Rtd.) Dr. Maheep Bhatnagar Department of Zoology Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University University of Rajasthan, Jaipur Udaipur Prof. (Rtd.) Dr. K.K. Sharma Prof. M.M. Ranga Mahrishi Dayanand Saraswati University, Ajmer Ajmer Dr. Anuradha Singh Dr. Prahlad Dubey Rtd. Lecturer Government College Head Department of Zoology Kota Government College , Kota Dr. Subrat Sharma Dr. Anuradha Dubey Lecturer Deputy Director Government College , Kota School of Science and Technology Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Dr. Subhash Chandra Director (Regional Center) VMOU, Kota Editing and Course Writing Editors Dr. Subhash Chandra SANDEEP HOODA Director ,Regional Center Assistant Professor of Zoology Vardhman Mahaveer Open University ,Kota Vardhman Mahaveer Open University ,Kota Writers: Writer Name Unit No. Writer Name Unit No Ms. Asha Kumari Verma 3,5,8 Dr. Abhishek Rajpurohit 11,13 UGC-NET JRF Department of Assistant Professor Zoology, JNVU, Lachoo Memorial College Jodhpur of Science & Technology,Jodhpur Dr. Neetu Kachhawaha 1,2,4,6,7,12 Dr. Subhash Chandra 14,15 Assistant Professor, Director ,Regional Center Department of Zoology, Vardhman Mahaveer University of Rajasthan ,Jaipur.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSUE 58, April, 2017
    FLY TIMES ISSUE 58, April, 2017 Stephen D. Gaimari, editor Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch California Department of Food & Agriculture 3294 Meadowview Road Sacramento, California 95832, USA Tel: (916) 262-1131 FAX: (916) 262-1190 Email: [email protected] Welcome to the latest issue of Fly Times! As usual, I thank everyone for sending in such interesting articles. I hope you all enjoy reading it as much as I enjoyed putting it together. Please let me encourage all of you to consider contributing articles that may be of interest to the Diptera community for the next issue. Fly Times offers a great forum to report on your research activities and to make requests for taxa being studied, as well as to report interesting observations about flies, to discuss new and improved methods, to advertise opportunities for dipterists, to report on or announce meetings relevant to the community, etc., with all the associated digital images you wish to provide. This is also a great place to report on your interesting (and hopefully fruitful) collecting activities! Really anything fly-related is considered. And of course, thanks very much to Chris Borkent for again assembling the list of Diptera citations since the last Fly Times! The electronic version of the Fly Times continues to be hosted on the North American Dipterists Society website at http://www.nadsdiptera.org/News/FlyTimes/Flyhome.htm. For this issue, I want to again thank all the contributors for sending me such great articles! Feel free to share your opinions or provide ideas on how to improve the newsletter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flies on Mushrooms Cultivated in the Antalya-Korkuteli District And
    AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ Re v iew Article / Derleme Makalesi ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ DERGİSİ (201 5 ) 2 8 ( 2 ): 61 - 66 www.ziraatdergi.akdeniz.edu.tr The flies on mushrooms cultivated in the Antalya - Korkuteli district and their control Antalya - Korkuteli Yöresi’nde kültürü yapılan mantarlarda bulunan sinekler ve mücadelesi Fedai ERLER 1 , Ersin POLAT 2 1 Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Bitki Kor uma Bölümü, 07070 Antalya 2 Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü, 07070 Antalya Corresponding author ( Sorumlu yazar ): F . Erler , e - mai l ( e - posta ): [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRA CT Received 04 April 2014 Over the last two decades, mushroom growing has become one of the most dynamically Received in revised form 24 July 2014 developing fields of agriculture in Turkey. In parallel with this development, populations of Accepted 20 March 2015 some arthropod pests, especially mushroom flies belonging to different families of the order Diptera, have steeply increased in recent years. Sciarid, phorid and cecidomyiid flies, Keywords : especially Lycoriella ingenua (Dufour) (Sciaridae) and Megas elia halterata (Wood) (Phoridae) being the most common species in the Antalya - Korkuteli district (South - Western Agaricus bisporus Turkey), affected the cultivation of white button mushroom [ Agaricus bisporus (Lange) Cultivated mushroom Imbach], the most commonly grown mushroom species in Turke y. Recently, mushroom Mushroom flies scatopsid flies (Scatopsidae) have arisen as a serious new threat in the Antalya - Korkuteli Contr ol district. It is surmised that the infestation by these flies has affected approximately 70% of the Antalya mushroom growing cellars in the district. Un til now, a total of 15 fly species ( Sciaridae: 3, Phoridae: 1, Cecidomyiidae: 8 and Scatopsidae: 3) was detected to cause damage in the cultivated mushrooms in the Korkuteli district.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticide Tables for Potato Pests
    In fields that are plowed deeply in the fall, wireworms will turn but research is ongoing in this area. An important management up during plowing. They may be detected by following behind the consideration is avoiding prolonged periods of time between vine plow and checking for them in the turned-up soil. Fall plowing, death and harvest. Typical wireworm damage occurs mid-season however, is becoming much less common. and results at harvest in healed holes in tubers; however, tubers left in the field for weeks after vine death can be re-infested resulting in There are no established treatment thresholds for wireworms in serious tuber damage and tubers containing wireworms at harvest. potatoes. Management decisions are a complex assessment of crop history, scouting, previous pesticide treatments, etc. For more information, see http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/28267.pdf Management—cultural and biological controls Management—chemical control: HOME USE Crop rotation is an important tool for wireworm control. ♦ azadirachtin (as a mix with pyrethrins)—Some formulations are Wireworms tend to increase rapidly among red and sweet clover OMRI-listed for organic use. and small grains (particularly barley and wheat). Birds feeding ♦ bifenthrin (as a mix with zeta-cypermethrin). in recently plowed fields destroy many wireworms. However, ♦ cyfluthrin in seriously infested fields this does not reduce the overall ♦ zeta-cypermethrin pest population below economic levels. To date, field tests of Management—chemical control: COMMERCIAL USE entomopathogenic nematodes in wireworm infested fields show they do not effectively control wireworms. There are no parasites or See: biological insecticides known to be effective in wireworm control, Pesticide Tables for Potato Pests Pesticide Tables for Potato Pests Tables 1-3 present nearly exhaustive lists of insecticides and biocontrol agents that are registered to control arthropod pests of potatoes in the PNW.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 62/63 Autumn 2006 + Spring 2007 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 62/3 Autumn 2006 + Spring 2007 Scheme Organisers Tipuloidea & Ptychopteridae - Cranefly Workshops Mr A E Stubbs 181 Broadway Peterborough PE1 4DS Please notify Dr Mark Hill of changes: David Heaver BRC (CEH) [][] 5 Albert Road, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 2DN Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, co-organiser: John Kramer [email protected] Cambridgeshire PE28 2LS (Tel. 01487 772413) 31 Ash Tree Road Field Meetings [email protected] Oadby, Leicester, LE2 5TE Recording Schemes Sciomyzidae - Snail-killing Flies Mr. R.K.A.Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE This year will see some substantial changes in the [email protected] ways in which some Recording Scheme Organisers Dr I F G McLean Membership archive and exchange records. Whilst all will read- 109 Miller Way, Brampton, Huntingdon, Cambs ily accept records in written form the following PE28 4TZ symbols are used to indicate some of the known (or [email protected] Mr M. Parker surmised) methods by which Scheme Organisers [email protected] 9 East Wyld Road, Weymouth, Dorset, DT4 0RP may currently receive records electronically: [][] [email protected] / BAP Recorder Darwyn Sumner Hoverflies MapMate Barbara Schulten [email protected] Microsoft Access [][][] Dipterists Digest Spreadsheet (Excel) Dr S G Ball Square brackets indicate that the organiser can 255 Eastfield Road
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Immature Stages of British Flies
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2013 Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects Vol. 10, Part 14 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IMMATURE STAGES OF BRITISH FLIES DIPTERA LARVAE, WITH NOTES ON EGGS, PUP ARIA AND PUPAE K. G. V. Smith ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Handbooks for the Vol. 10, Part 14 Identification of British Insects Editors: W. R. Dolling & R. R. Askew AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IMMATURE STAGES OF BRITISH FLIES DIPTERA LARVAE, WITH NOTES ON EGGS, PUPARIA AND PUPAE By K. G. V. SMITH Department of Entomology British Museum (Natural History) London SW7 5BD 1989 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON The aim of the Handbooks is to provide illustrated identification keys to the insects of Britain, together with concise morphological, biological and distributional information. Each handbook should serve both as an introduction to a particular group of insects and as an identification manual. Details of handbooks currently available can be obtained from Publications Sales, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD. Cover illustration: egg of Muscidae; larva (lateral) of Lonchaea (Lonchaeidae); floating puparium of Elgiva rufa (Panzer) (Sciomyzidae). To Vera, my wife, with thanks for sharing my interest in insects World List abbreviation: Handbk /dent. Br./nsects. © Royal Entomological Society of London, 1989 First published 1989 by the British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD.
    [Show full text]
  • Oyster Mushroom)
    Unclassified ENV/JM/MONO(2005)17 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 21-Oct-2005 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________ English - Or. English ENVIRONMENT DIRECTORATE JOINT MEETING OF THE CHEMICALS COMMITTEE AND Unclassified ENV/JM/MONO(2005)17 THE WORKING PARTY ON CHEMICALS, PESTICIDES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology No. 34 CONSENSUS DOCUMENT ON THE BIOLOGY OF PLEUROTUS SPP. (OYSTER MUSHROOM) English - Or. English JT00192447 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format ENV/JM/MONO(2005)17 Also published in the Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology: No. 8, Consensus Document on the Biology of Solanum tuberosum subsp. tuberosum (Potato) (1997) No. 9, Consensus Document on the Biology of Triticum aestivum (Bread Wheat) (1999) No. 10, Consensus Document on General Information Concerning the Genes and Their Enzymes that Confer Tolerance to Glyphosate Herbicide (1999) No. 11, Consensus Document on General Information Concerning the Genes and Their Enzymes that Confer Tolerance to Phosphinothricin Herbicide (1999) No. 12, Consensus Document on the Biology of Picea abies (L.) Karst (Norway Spruce) (1999) No. 13, Consensus Document on the Biology of Picea glauca (Moench) Voss (White Spruce) (1999) No. 14, Consensus Document on the Biology of Oryza sativa (Rice) (1999) No. 15, Consensus Document on the Biology of Glycine max (L.) Merr. (Soybean) (2000) No. 16, Consensus Document on the Biology of Populus L. (Poplars) (2000) No. 17, Report of the OECD Workshop on Unique Identification Systems for Transgenic Plants, Charmey, Switzerland, 2- 4 October 2000 (2001) No.
    [Show full text]