DOCSLIB.ORG

Pesticide Tables for Potato Pests

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pesticide Tables for Potato Pests In fields that are plowed deeply in the fall, wireworms will turn but research is ongoing in this area. An important management up during plowing. They may be detected by following behind the consideration is avoiding prolonged periods of time between vine plow and checking for them in the turned-up soil. Fall plowing, death and harvest. Typical wireworm damage occurs mid-season however, is becoming much less common. and results at harvest in healed holes in tubers; however, tubers left in the field for weeks after vine death can be re-infested resulting in There are no established treatment thresholds for wireworms in serious tuber damage and tubers containing wireworms at harvest. potatoes. Management decisions are a complex assessment of crop history, scouting, previous pesticide treatments, etc. For more information, see http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/28267.pdf Management—cultural and biological controls Management—chemical control: HOME USE Crop rotation is an important tool for wireworm control. ♦ azadirachtin (as a mix with pyrethrins)—Some formulations are Wireworms tend to increase rapidly among red and sweet clover OMRI-listed for organic use. and small grains (particularly barley and wheat). Birds feeding ♦ bifenthrin (as a mix with zeta-cypermethrin). in recently plowed fields destroy many wireworms. However, ♦ cyfluthrin in seriously infested fields this does not reduce the overall ♦ zeta-cypermethrin pest population below economic levels. To date, field tests of Management—chemical control: COMMERCIAL USE entomopathogenic nematodes in wireworm infested fields show they do not effectively control wireworms. There are no parasites or See: biological insecticides known to be effective in wireworm control, Pesticide Tables for Potato Pests Pesticide Tables for Potato Pests Tables 1-3 present nearly exhaustive lists of insecticides and biocontrol agents that are registered to control arthropod pests of potatoes in the PNW. Some of these products provide better control than others. Tables 1 and 2 are lists of conventional pesticides, with Table 1 being products with a single active ingredient and Table 2 being mixed products commonly known as “package mixes.” Most package mixes have a broad spectrum of control, but if over-used can contribute to outbreaks of certain pests such as aphids and spider mites, and also increase the risk of insecticide resistance due to over-application of a single mode-of-action such as the neonicotinoids (IRAC Group 4A). Table 3 lists many of the available products that are either biocontrol microbes, approved for organic use, or are not directly insecticidal. The latter category includes some of the oil sprays, which are most effective in interrupting virus transmission by aphids, as opposed to killing insects outright. Table 1. Single active ingredient products Insecticide Signal Restricted PHI Type Active Ingredient Trade Name Target Pest(s) REI Group Word Use? (days) FU 1,3 dichloropropene Telone II (Dow) symphylan, Soil Warning N 5 NA wireworm fumigant days F abamectin Agri-mek, Colorado potato 6 Warning Y 12 hr 14 (a.k.a. avermectin Epi-Mek (Syngenta), beetle, potato B1) Abacus (Rotam), Reaper psyllid, spider mite, (Loveland), Abba Ultra thrips* (Makhteshim Agan), F acetamiprid Assail 30SG, Assail 70WP, aphid, beetle, 4A Caution N 12 hr 7 Intruder Max 70WP leafhopper*, (United Phosphorus) potato psyllid* F afidopyropen Sefina (BASF) aphid, whitefly, 9D Caution N 12 hr 7 potato psyllid* F bifenazate Acramite (UPLCrompton) spider mite 25 Caution N 12 hr 14 IF, F bifenthrin Capture LFR, Brigade beetle, various soil 3 Warning Y 12 hr 21 2EC (FMC), Fanfare 2EC grubs, wireworm. (Makhteshim Agan), Lepidoptera*, Tundra EC (Winfield) spider mite*, BiFenture EC (United leafhopper*, lygus*, Phosphorus) potato psyllid* IF carbaryl Sevin 4F, Sevin 80S, Sevin beetle, 1A Caution or N 12 hr 7 XLR Plus (Bayer), Sevin 5 Lepidoptera, Warning Bait (Wilbur Ellis) stink bug, depending leafhopper, potato on psyllid*; various formulation soil-inhabiting arthropods (5 Bait) PNW Insect Management Handbook K211 Table 1. Single active ingredient products Insecticide Signal Restricted PHI Type Active Ingredient Trade Name Target Pest(s) REI Group Word Use? (days) F chlorantraniliprole Coragen (FMC) Colorado potato 28 None N 4 hr 14 beetle, Lepidoptera F, IF clothianidin Belay 50WDG, Belay beetle, aphid, 4A Caution N 12 hr 14 (Valent) leafhopper, psyllid IF cyantraniliprole Verimark (FMC), Exirel Colorado potato 28 Caution N 4 hr –2 (FMC) beetle, Lepidoptera F cyfluthrin Tombstone (Loveland) beetle, 3 Warning Y 12 hr 0 Lepidoptera, leafhopper, potato psyllid, F beta-cyfluthrin Baythroid XL (Bayer) beetle, 3 Warning Y 12 hr 0 Lepidoptera, leafhopper, potato psyllid F lambda-cyhalothrin Warrior, Warrior II aphid, beetle, 3 Warning Y 24 hr 7 (Syngenta), Province grasshopper, (Tenkoz), Silencer leafhopper, (Makhteshim Agan), Lepidoptera, Lambda-Cy (United potato psyllid, stink Phosphorus) bug F gamma- Respect, Respect EC beetle, 3 Warning or Y 12 hr 1 cypermethrin (BASF), Mustang, Mustang grasshopper Caution Max, Mustang Max EC, leafhopper, Mustang Max EW (FMC) Lepidoptera F cyromazine Trigard (Syngenta) Colorado potato 17 Caution N 12 hr 7 beetle F deltamethrin Battalion 0.2, Battalion 1.5 beetle, leafhopper, 3 Danger/ N 12 hr 3 (Arysta) Lepidoptera, Poison F dimethoate various brands, 2.67 and aphid, grasshopper, 1B Warning N 48 hr 0 4E formulations leafhopper, potato psyllid* F, IF dinotefuran Scorpion 35 SL (Gowan), beetle, leafhopper, 4A Caution N 12 hr 7 Venom (Valent) potato psyllid F esfenvalerate Asana (Valent), beetle, 3 Warning N 12 hr 7 S-FenvaloStar (LG grasshopper, Lifesciences), leafhopper, Zyrate (Rotam) Lepidoptera, potato psyllid IF ethoprop Mocap 15G, Mocap EC symphylan, 1B Danger/ Y 72 hr –2 (AMVAC) wireworm Poison F fenpyroximate Miteus (Nichino) leafhopper, potato 21A Warning N 12 hr 7 psyllid, spider mite IF fipronil Regent 4SC (BASF) wireworm 2B Warning Y 0 hr 90 F flonicamid Beleaf 50 SG (FMC) aphid, potato 9C Caution N 12 hr 7 psyllid, thrips*, whitefly F hexythiazox Onager Optek (Gowan), potato psyllid, 10A Caution N 12 hr 21 Hexamit spider mite, (Albaugh/Agri Star) K212 PNW Insect Management Handbook Table 1. Single active ingredient products Insecticide Signal Restricted PHI Type Active Ingredient Trade Name Target Pest(s) REI Group Word Use? (days) IF, F, imidacloprid Many brands, and aphid, beetle, 4A Caution N 12 hr 7 SP formulations leafhopper, potato psyllid, wireworm (seed piece damage) F indoxacarb Avaunt (FMC) Lepidoptera, 22 Caution N 12 hr 7 Colorado potato beetle F malathion Many brands and aphid, blister 1B Warning or N 12 hr 0 formulations beetle, Caution grasshopper, leafhopper F methomyl Lannate LV, Lannate SP aphid, flea beetle, 1A Danger/ Y 48 hr 6 (Cortevat), Nudrin LV, leafhopper, Poison Nudrin SP (Rotam) Lepidoptera, Colorado potato beetle*, lygus, potato psyllid*, thrips* F novaluron Rimon (Chemtura) Colorado 15 Warning N 12 hr 14 potato beetle, Lepidoptera, lygus*, potato psyllid, thrips*, whitefly F, IF oxamyl Vydate C-LV, Vydate L aphid, beetle, 1A Danger/ Y 48 hr 7 (DuPont) leafhopper, Poison potato psyllid, Lepidoptera*, lygus, thrips* F permethrin Many brands, and beetle, leafhopper, 3 Warning or Y 12 hr 14 formulations Lepidoptera, Caution potato psyllid, lygus, thrips* IF phorate Thimet (Amvac) aphid, Colorado 1B Danger/ Y 72 hr 90 potato beetle, Poison leafhopper F phosmet Imidan 70-W (Gowan) beetle, leafhopper, 1B Warning N 5 7 tuberworm, days Lepidoptera*, potato psyllid F propargite Comite, Omite (UPL NA) spider mite 12C Danger Y 2 14 Endomite (Atticus) days F pymetrozine Fulfill (Syngenta, Adama) aphid, potato 9B Caution N 12 hr 14 psyllid F spinetoram Radiant SC () Colorado 5 Caution N 4 hr 7 potato beetle, Lepidoptera, thrips lygus* potato psyllid, F spiromesifen Oberon 2SC, Oberon 4SC spider mite, potato 23 Caution N 12 hr 7 (Bayer) psyllid, whitefly F spirotetramat Movento, Movento HL, aphid, potato 23 Caution N 24 hr 7 Kontos (Bayer) psyllid, whitefly PNW Insect Management Handbook K213 Table 1. Single active ingredient products Insecticide Signal Restricted PHI Type Active Ingredient Trade Name Target Pest(s) REI Group Word Use? (days) F sulfoxaflor Transform (Corteva) aphid, leafhopper, 4C Danger N 24 hr 7 potato psyllid, whitefly, lygus F, IF, thiamethoxam Actara, Cruiser 5FS, aphid, beetle, 4A Caution N 12 hr 14 SP Platinum, Platinum 75SG leafhopper, potato (Syngenta) psyllid, wireworm (seed piece protection) F tolfenpyrad Torac (Nichino) aphid, Colorado 21A Warning N 12 hr 14 potato beetle, leafhopper, potato psyllid, thrips All trade names may not be listed here. Product application codes: F = foliar; FU = fumigant; IF = in-furrow; SP = seed protectant. PHI = Pre-harvest interval. REI = Restricted entry interval. Insecticide Group codes refer to modes of action, and should be used in managing insecticide resistance; for more on insecticide codes and resistance management, see: http://www.nwpotatoresearch.com/. Always consult specific pesticide labels before making recommendations or deciding on a product and treatment. *The pesticide label does not list this pest, but the insecticide has been shown to be effective in its control. 1 Penncap has a 5-day PHI. 2 Some products do not list PHI specifically. Table 2. Package mixes of active ingredients. Active Signal Restricted PHI Type Active Ingredient 1 Trade Name Target Pest(s) REI Ingredient 2 Word use? (days) FU 1,3 dichloropropene chloropicrin Telone C17 symphylan, wireworm Danger Y 5 days
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PAEDOGENESIS in ERISTALIS ARBUSTORUM
    PAEDOGENESIS in ERISTALIS ARBUSTORUM Bart Achterkamp, under supervision of dr. Mart M. Ottenheim, dr. Leo W. Beukeboom and prof.dr. Paul M. Brakefield Section Evolutionary Biology and Section Animal Ecology, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences Leiden University M. Sc. Thesis 1999 PAEDOGENESIS in Eristalis arbustorum (Diptera: Syrphidae) Sum mary Paedogenesisis the reproduction by larvae or juveniles. In insects this form of reproduction is known from one beetle, several species of gall midges and possibly Erisalishoverfiies.This study aims to show paedogenesis forE. arbuslorum under controlled conditions. The first two experiments were unsuccessful. In the third experiment, a total of 1266 larvae were reared and five occasions of paedogenesis were recorded among 542 successful pupations. In all cases of paedogenesis, one larva was put in the container and two larvae or pupae were collected later. The life history consequences of this way of reproduction are discussed. "Now don't forget. Gorold .THIS time punch some holes in the lid!" 2 I cunvrt(': BiBLIOTHEEK RU GRONINGEN 30 — * i7DOAA H"'t IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIII 217Q70R4 D67 INTRODUCTION .4 1.1 Life history .4 1.2 Terminology 5 1.3 Bisexual or parthenogenetic reproduction9 8 1 .4 Paedogenesis in non-insect animals 8 1.4.1 Phylum Hydrozoa 8 1.4.2 Phylum Platyhelminthes 9 1.4.3 Phylum Arthropoda: Rhizocephalan barnacles 9 1.4.4 Phylum Echinodermata 9 1.4.5 Paedogenetic salamanders 10 1.5 Paedogenesis in insects 11 1.5.1 Paedogenesis in Hemiptera 11 1.5.2 Paedogenesis
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Rests with Its Author
    University of Bath PHD Paedogenetic reproduction in Mycophila speyeri and Heteropeza pygmaea (Cecidomyiidae, Diptera) Hunt, Justine L. Award date: 1996 Awarding institution: University of Bath Link to publication Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 11. Oct. 2021 Paedogenetic Reproduction in Mycophila speyeri and Heteropeza pygmaea (Ceeidomyiidae, Diptera). Submitted by Justine L. Hunt for the degree of PhD. of the University of Bath, 1996. Copyright Attention is drawn to the fact that the copyright of this thesis rests with its author. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Gall Midges from the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Hans Roskam & Sébastien Carbonnelle
    annotated checklist of the gall midges from the netherlands, belgium and luxembourg (diptera: cecidomyiidae) Hans Roskam & Sébastien Carbonnelle The gall midges are one of the most important groups of gall makers. Emerging larvae produce stimuli and the host plant responds by producing galls, fascinating structures which provide food and shelter for the developing larvae. Most gall inducing midges are host specific: they are only able to induce galls in a few, often related, plant species. A few species have different feeding modes: among them are saprophagous, fungivorous and predaceous species and some are used in biocontrol. We recorded 416 species in the whole area; 366 species are recorded from the Netherlands, 270 species from Belgium and 96 species from Luxembourg. importance, in the 8th volume in the series by introduction Barnes (1946-1969) and published eleven papers Over more than a century M.W. Beijerinck (1851- (1957-1999) on gall midges new for the Dutch 1931), J.C.H. de Meijere (1866-1947) and W.M. fauna, and, last but not least, was responsible for Docters van Leeuwen (1880-1960) wrote impor- the cecidomyiids in the Checklist of the Diptera tant papers about plant galls in the Netherlands. of the Netherlands by Beuk (2002). Nijveldt’s Dutch checklists of Diptera started with Bennet collection of microscope slides, more than 5,600 & van Olivier (1825, with all species placed in specimens, 4,300 of Dutch origin, mainly collected Tipula). Checklists of cecidomyiids were started by, by himself, but also by De Meijere and Van der e.g., Van der Wulp (1859, 18 spp.), Van der Wulp Wulp during the second half of the 19th, and first & De Meijere (1898, 63 spp.) and De Meijere half of the 20th century, and also included in the (1939), with many supplements (e.g., De Meijere Naturalis collection, is a second main reference 1946).
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4.
    [Show full text]
  • Résumés Des Communications Et Posters Présentés Lors Du Xviiie Symposium International De La Société Européenne Des Nématologistes
    Résumés des communications et posters présentés lors du XVIIIe Symposium International de la Société Européenne des Nématologistes. Antibes,. France, 7-12 septembre' 1986. Abrantes, 1. M. de O. & Santos, M. S. N. de A. - Egg Alphey, T. J. & Phillips, M. S. - Integrated control of the production bv Meloidogyne arenaria on two host plants. potato cyst nimatode Globoderapallida using low rates of A Portuguese population of Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal, nematicide and partial resistors. 1889) Chitwood, 1949 race 2 was maintained on tomato cv. Rutgers in thegreenhouse. The objective of Our investigation At the present time there are no potato genotypes which was to determine the egg production by M. arenaria on two have absolute resistance to the potato cyst nematode (PCN), host plants using two procedures. In Our experiments tomato Globodera pallida. Partial resistance to G. pallida has been bred into cultivars of potato from Solanum vemei cv. Rutgers and balsam (Impatiens walleriana Hooketfil.) corn-mercial seedlings were inoculated withO00 5 eggs per plant.The plants and S. tuberosum ssp. andigena CPC 2802. Field experiments ! were harvested 60 days after inoculation and the eggs were havebeen undertaken to study the interactionbetween nematicide and partial resistance with respect to control of * separated from roots by the following two procedures: 1) eggs were collected by dissolving gelatinous matrices in a NaOCl PCN and potato yield. In this study potato genotypes with solution at a concentration of either 0.525 %,1.05 %,1.31 %, partial resistance derived from S. vemei were grown on land 1.75 % or 2.62 %;2) eggs were extracted comminuting the infested with G.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Sapro-Mycophagous Cecidomyiids (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Korea
    Entomological Research Bulletin 33(2): 115-117 (2017) Insect diversity Checklist of Sapro-mycophagous Cecidomyiids (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Korea Daseul Ham and Yeon Jae Bae* Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Korea *Correspondence Abstract Yeon Jae Bae, Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, A revised checklist of the Korean sapro-mycophagous cecidomyiids is provided. College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Anaretella defecta (Winnertz), Lestremia cinerea Macquart, Lestremia leucophaea Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk- (Meigen), Coccopsilis marginata (Meijere), Divellepidosis rotundata (Yukawa), gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea E-mail: [email protected] Divellepidosis separata (Yukawa), and Stomatocolpodia decussata (Yukawa) are added to the Korean sapro-mycophagous cecidomyiid fauna and Peromyia spinosa Received 10 November 2017 Jaschhof is moved to the subfamily Micromyinae from Lestremiinae. Accepted 15 November 2017 Key words: checklist, Korean sapro-mycophagous cecidomyiids Introduction based on previous taxonomic studies and checklists of Kore- an sapro-mycophagous cecidomyiids (ESK & KSAE 1994, Members of the gall midge family Cecidomyiidae are tiny Lee & Kim 2003, Paek et al. 2010, Shin et al. 2011, Ham & and fragile midges, ranging 0.5-3 mm in body length, rare- Bae 2016a, 2016b). Twelve species of Korean sapro-myco- ly larger than 8 mm (Oosterbroek & Hurkmans 2006). They phagous cecidomyiids belonging to 8 genera and 3 subfam- can be divided into three groups, phytophagous, predaceous, ilies are listed in this study. Further taxonomic studies are and sapro-mycophagous gall midges, based on feeding hab- needed not only to add Korean sapro-mycophagous cecido- its of larvae (Yukawa 1971, Harris 2004a).
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX G. Bibliography of ECOTOX Open Literature
    APPENDIX G. Bibliography of ECOTOX Open Literature Explanation of OPP Acceptability Criteria and Rejection Codes for ECOTOX Data Studies located and coded into ECOTOX must meet acceptability criteria, as established in the Interim Guidance of the Evaluation Criteria for Ecological Toxicity Data in the Open Literature, Phase I and II, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, July 16, 2004. Studies that do not meet these criteria are designated in the bibliography as “Accepted for ECOTOX but not OPP.” The intent of the acceptability criteria is to ensure data quality and verifiability. The criteria parallel criteria used in evaluating registrant-submitted studies. Specific criteria are listed below, along with the corresponding rejection code. · The paper does not report toxicology information for a chemical of concern to OPP; (Rejection Code: NO COC) • The article is not published in English language; (Rejection Code: NO FOREIGN) • The study is not presented as a full article. Abstracts will not be considered; (Rejection Code: NO ABSTRACT) • The paper is not publicly available document; (Rejection Code: NO NOT PUBLIC (typically not used, as any paper acquired from the ECOTOX holding or through the literature search is considered public) • The paper is not the primary source of the data; (Rejection Code: NO REVIEW) • The paper does not report that treatment(s) were compared to an acceptable control; (Rejection Code: NO CONTROL) • The paper does not report an explicit duration of exposure; (Rejection Code: NO DURATION) • The paper does not report a concurrent environmental chemical concentration/dose or application rate; (Rejection Code: NO CONC) • The paper does not report the location of the study (e.g., laboratory vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomology I
    MZO-08 Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Entomology I MZO-08 Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Entomology I Course Development Committee Chair Person Prof. Ashok Sharma Prof. L.R.Gurjar Vice-Chancellor Director (Academic) Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Coordinator and Members Convener SANDEEP HOODA Assistant Professor of Zoology School of Science & Technology Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Members Prof . (Rtd.) Dr. D.P. Jaroli Prof. (Rtd.) Dr. Reena Mathur Professor Emeritus Former Head Department of Zoology Department of Zoology University of Rajasthan, Jaipur University of Rajasthan, Jaipur Prof. (Rtd.) Dr. S.C. Joshi Prof. (Rtd.) Dr. Maheep Bhatnagar Department of Zoology Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University University of Rajasthan, Jaipur Udaipur Prof. (Rtd.) Dr. K.K. Sharma Prof. M.M. Ranga Mahrishi Dayanand Saraswati University, Ajmer Ajmer Dr. Anuradha Singh Dr. Prahlad Dubey Rtd. Lecturer Government College Head Department of Zoology Kota Government College , Kota Dr. Subrat Sharma Dr. Anuradha Dubey Lecturer Deputy Director Government College , Kota School of Science and Technology Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Dr. Subhash Chandra Director (Regional Center) VMOU, Kota Editing and Course Writing Editors Dr. Subhash Chandra SANDEEP HOODA Director ,Regional Center Assistant Professor of Zoology Vardhman Mahaveer Open University ,Kota Vardhman Mahaveer Open University ,Kota Writers: Writer Name Unit No. Writer Name Unit No Ms. Asha Kumari Verma 3,5,8 Dr. Abhishek Rajpurohit 11,13 UGC-NET JRF Department of Assistant Professor Zoology, JNVU, Lachoo Memorial College Jodhpur of Science & Technology,Jodhpur Dr. Neetu Kachhawaha 1,2,4,6,7,12 Dr. Subhash Chandra 14,15 Assistant Professor, Director ,Regional Center Department of Zoology, Vardhman Mahaveer University of Rajasthan ,Jaipur.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSUE 58, April, 2017
    FLY TIMES ISSUE 58, April, 2017 Stephen D. Gaimari, editor Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch California Department of Food & Agriculture 3294 Meadowview Road Sacramento, California 95832, USA Tel: (916) 262-1131 FAX: (916) 262-1190 Email: [email protected] Welcome to the latest issue of Fly Times! As usual, I thank everyone for sending in such interesting articles. I hope you all enjoy reading it as much as I enjoyed putting it together. Please let me encourage all of you to consider contributing articles that may be of interest to the Diptera community for the next issue. Fly Times offers a great forum to report on your research activities and to make requests for taxa being studied, as well as to report interesting observations about flies, to discuss new and improved methods, to advertise opportunities for dipterists, to report on or announce meetings relevant to the community, etc., with all the associated digital images you wish to provide. This is also a great place to report on your interesting (and hopefully fruitful) collecting activities! Really anything fly-related is considered. And of course, thanks very much to Chris Borkent for again assembling the list of Diptera citations since the last Fly Times! The electronic version of the Fly Times continues to be hosted on the North American Dipterists Society website at http://www.nadsdiptera.org/News/FlyTimes/Flyhome.htm. For this issue, I want to again thank all the contributors for sending me such great articles! Feel free to share your opinions or provide ideas on how to improve the newsletter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flies on Mushrooms Cultivated in the Antalya-Korkuteli District And
    AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ Re v iew Article / Derleme Makalesi ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ DERGİSİ (201 5 ) 2 8 ( 2 ): 61 - 66 www.ziraatdergi.akdeniz.edu.tr The flies on mushrooms cultivated in the Antalya - Korkuteli district and their control Antalya - Korkuteli Yöresi’nde kültürü yapılan mantarlarda bulunan sinekler ve mücadelesi Fedai ERLER 1 , Ersin POLAT 2 1 Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Bitki Kor uma Bölümü, 07070 Antalya 2 Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü, 07070 Antalya Corresponding author ( Sorumlu yazar ): F . Erler , e - mai l ( e - posta ): [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRA CT Received 04 April 2014 Over the last two decades, mushroom growing has become one of the most dynamically Received in revised form 24 July 2014 developing fields of agriculture in Turkey. In parallel with this development, populations of Accepted 20 March 2015 some arthropod pests, especially mushroom flies belonging to different families of the order Diptera, have steeply increased in recent years. Sciarid, phorid and cecidomyiid flies, Keywords : especially Lycoriella ingenua (Dufour) (Sciaridae) and Megas elia halterata (Wood) (Phoridae) being the most common species in the Antalya - Korkuteli district (South - Western Agaricus bisporus Turkey), affected the cultivation of white button mushroom [ Agaricus bisporus (Lange) Cultivated mushroom Imbach], the most commonly grown mushroom species in Turke y. Recently, mushroom Mushroom flies scatopsid flies (Scatopsidae) have arisen as a serious new threat in the Antalya - Korkuteli Contr ol district. It is surmised that the infestation by these flies has affected approximately 70% of the Antalya mushroom growing cellars in the district. Un til now, a total of 15 fly species ( Sciaridae: 3, Phoridae: 1, Cecidomyiidae: 8 and Scatopsidae: 3) was detected to cause damage in the cultivated mushrooms in the Korkuteli district.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 62/63 Autumn 2006 + Spring 2007 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 62/3 Autumn 2006 + Spring 2007 Scheme Organisers Tipuloidea & Ptychopteridae - Cranefly Workshops Mr A E Stubbs 181 Broadway Peterborough PE1 4DS Please notify Dr Mark Hill of changes: David Heaver BRC (CEH) [][] 5 Albert Road, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 2DN Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, co-organiser: John Kramer [email protected] Cambridgeshire PE28 2LS (Tel. 01487 772413) 31 Ash Tree Road Field Meetings [email protected] Oadby, Leicester, LE2 5TE Recording Schemes Sciomyzidae - Snail-killing Flies Mr. R.K.A.Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE This year will see some substantial changes in the [email protected] ways in which some Recording Scheme Organisers Dr I F G McLean Membership archive and exchange records. Whilst all will read- 109 Miller Way, Brampton, Huntingdon, Cambs ily accept records in written form the following PE28 4TZ symbols are used to indicate some of the known (or [email protected] Mr M. Parker surmised) methods by which Scheme Organisers [email protected] 9 East Wyld Road, Weymouth, Dorset, DT4 0RP may currently receive records electronically: [][] [email protected] / BAP Recorder Darwyn Sumner Hoverflies MapMate Barbara Schulten [email protected] Microsoft Access [][][] Dipterists Digest Spreadsheet (Excel) Dr S G Ball Square brackets indicate that the organiser can 255 Eastfield Road
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Immature Stages of British Flies
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2013 Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects Vol. 10, Part 14 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IMMATURE STAGES OF BRITISH FLIES DIPTERA LARVAE, WITH NOTES ON EGGS, PUP ARIA AND PUPAE K. G. V. Smith ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Handbooks for the Vol. 10, Part 14 Identification of British Insects Editors: W. R. Dolling & R. R. Askew AN INTRODUCTION TO THE IMMATURE STAGES OF BRITISH FLIES DIPTERA LARVAE, WITH NOTES ON EGGS, PUPARIA AND PUPAE By K. G. V. SMITH Department of Entomology British Museum (Natural History) London SW7 5BD 1989 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON The aim of the Handbooks is to provide illustrated identification keys to the insects of Britain, together with concise morphological, biological and distributional information. Each handbook should serve both as an introduction to a particular group of insects and as an identification manual. Details of handbooks currently available can be obtained from Publications Sales, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD. Cover illustration: egg of Muscidae; larva (lateral) of Lonchaea (Lonchaeidae); floating puparium of Elgiva rufa (Panzer) (Sciomyzidae). To Vera, my wife, with thanks for sharing my interest in insects World List abbreviation: Handbk /dent. Br./nsects. © Royal Entomological Society of London, 1989 First published 1989 by the British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD.
    [Show full text]