DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 Program SR Research Multiple Eye Tracking Solutions in One A single EyeLink 1000 Plus can be used: • with the head free-to-move as a remote eye tracker • with the head stabilized for enhanced precision • concurrently with MRI, MEG, EEG, TMS, and more • with infants, patients, older adults,& non-human primates • in the lab or off-site (e.g. hospitals, schools, homes) • for experiments or real-world tasks NEW features and updates for all EyeLink users: • Extra visualization options and reports in Data Viewer • Screen Recorder software with Data Viewer integration • Software Updates available at www.sr-support.com • Newsletter at www.sr-research.com/signup.html Vision Sciences Society 16th Annual Meeting, May 13-18, 2016 TradeWinds Island Resorts, St. Pete Beach, Florida Program Contents Board of Directors 2 VSS Public Lecture 30 President’s Welcome 3 Funding Workshop 31 Committees, Staff and Sponsors 4 Meet the Professors 32 Meeting Schedule 5 Member-Initiated Symposia 33 Schedule-at-a-Glance 8 Saturday Morning Talks 36 Poster Schedule 10 Saturday Morning Posters 37 Abstract Numbering System 11 Saturday Afternoon Talks 42 Talk Schedule 12 Saturday Afternoon Posters 43 Keynote Address 13 Sunday Morning Talks 48 Opening Night Reception 13 Sunday Morning Posters 49 Elsevier/VSS Sunday Afternoon Talks 54 Young Investigator Award 14 Sunday Afternoon Posters 55 Davida Teller Award 15 Monday Morning Talks 60 Ken Nakayama Medal for Monday Morning Posters 61 Excellence in Vision Science 17 Tuesday Morning Talks 66 Student and Postdoc Workshops 18 Tuesday Morning Posters 67 Elsevier/Vision Research Student Travel Awards 20 Tuesday Afternoon Talks 72 Club Vision Dance Party 20 Tuesday Afternoon Posters 74 Satellite Events 21 Wednesday Morning Talks 79 Attendee Resources 22 Wednesday Morning Posters 80 14th Annual Dinner Topic Index 84 and Demo Night 25 Author Index 87 ARVO/VSS Summer Research Posters and Exhibits Floor Plans 100 Fellowship 27 TradeWinds Island Grand Hotel Map 101 Exhibitors 28 Advertisements 102 Program and Abstracts cover designs by Michael Barnett, Stanford University T-shirt, mug, and tote design by Rain Jirui Li, York University Board of Directors Anthony Norcia Preeti Verghese Mary Hayhoe Eli Brenner Norma Graham (2017) President (2018) President Elect (2016) Past President (2018) Vrije University (2017) Treasurer Stanford University Smith-Kettlewell Eye University of Texas, Amsterdam Columbia University Research Institute Austin (year) denotes end of term Jeffrey Schall Frank Tong Andrew Watson Jeremy Wolfe (2019) Vanderbilt (2016) Vanderbilt (2018) NASA Ames (2019) Harvard University University Research Center Medical School Founders Past Presidents Past Board Members Ken Nakayama Mary Hayhoe Tony Movshon Frans Verstraten Allison Sekuler Harvard University 2014 – 2015 2009 - 2010 2011 – 2015 2006 - 2009 Tom Sanocki Frans Verstraten Wilson (Bill) Geisler Julio Martinez Mary Peterson University of South 2013 - 2014 2008 - 2009 2012 – 2015 2006 - 2009 Miguel Eckstein Steve Shevell Florida Karl Gegenfurtner Steve Shevell 2011 - 2014 2006 - 2009 2012 - 2013 2007 - 2008 Barbara Dosher Marvin Chun Marisa Carrasco Tatiana Pasternak 2010 - 2013 2005 - 2008 2011 - 2012 2005-2007 Karl Gegenfurtner Tatiana Pasternak Pascal Mamassian Ken Nakayama 2010 - 2014 2002 - 2008 2010 - 2011 2001 - 2005 Marisa Carrasco David Knill 2009 - 2013 2002 - 2007 Zoe Kourtzi Mike Paradiso 2009 - 2012 2002 - 2007 Pascal Mamassian Randolph Blake 2008 - 2012 2002 - 2006 Tony Movshon Tom Sanocki 2008 - 2011 2001 - 2005 Wilson (Bill) Geisler Ken Nakayama 2007 - 2010 2001 - 2005 2 Vision Sciences Society President’s Welcome On behalf of the Vision Sciences Society Board of Directors, present three major awards The 2016 Young Inves- I’m delighted to welcome you to our 16th annual tigator Award goes to Nick Turk-Browne for his meeting, the third to be held in St Pete Beach The work on visual perception and cognition, learning meeting will feature 1460 scheduled talks/posters and memory This award is sponsored by Elsevier The official program starts off on Friday afternoon Limited and Vision Research who are also sponsoring with six Symposia, including the semi-annual ARVO 20 Student Travel Awards We will be presenting at VSS session This year’s topic is high-precision the Davida Teller Award, established in memory analyses of retinal and thalamic circuits, featuring of Davida Teller, to honor outstanding women outstanding investigators from the ARVO commu- scientists This year’s awardee is Janette Atkinson, nity In addition to this series of joint symposia that a pioneer in the fields of normal and abnormal alternates between the ARVO and VSS meeting, visual development Finally, a new award, the Ken the two organizations have introduced the ARVO/ Nakayama Medal for Excellence in Vision Science VSS Summer Research Fellowship This program will be presented for the first time. The Medal is being will financially support a trainee from each society awarded to Horace Barlow for his seminal contribu- to work with a counterpart mentor from the other tions to our understanding of visual coding Please society on a summer research project The intent of join us for the Awards Ceremony and it’s accompa- these two joint programs is to keep members of the nying lectures respective societies informed of the latest research of New this year is “Meet the Professors”, an opportu- mutual interest and to foster an exchange of knowl- nity to meet with professors and VSS board members edge and expertise to discuss any topic you like This event will be held A highlight of the meeting will be the Keynote beachside on Monday afternoon, before Demo Night Address on Saturday evening This year’s speaker Be sure to pre-register on the VSS website is Sabine Kastner Professor Kastner has made I also encourage you to attend the Business Meeting numerous contributions to our understanding of on Tuesday afternoon. We have several significant the neural basis of visual perception, attention, and items on the agenda for this year, including discus- awareness through her multi-pronged approach that sions of a potential new role for VSS in advocacy uses neuroimaging in humans and monkeys, monkey for science and a discussion of the Board’s effort to physiology and studies in patients with brain lesions promote diversity in all aspects of the organization We look forward to her summary of results from As always, the Board is keenly interested in your this wide-ranging research program The Keynote suggestions for ways in which we can improve the Address is sponsored this year by VPixx Technolo- meeting and our Society gies Tony Norcia Another highlight of the meeting is the Awards President, Vision Sciences Society 2016 Ceremony on Monday afternoon This year we will Vision Sciences Society 3 Committees, Staff and Sponsors Abstract Jason Gold Ruth Rosenholtz Presidential VSS Staff Mark Greenlee Bruno Rossion Review Julie Harris Michele Rucci Advisory Shauney Wilson Executive Director Sheng He Dov Sagi Committee Committee & Event Director John Henderson Brian Scholl David Alais Marisa Carrasco Todd Horowitz Lisa Scott Shawna Lampkin George Alvarez Karl Gegenfurtner Alex Huk Aaron Seitz Event Manager Barton Anderson Mary Hayhoe Anya Hurlbert Daniel Simons Jeff Wilson Benjamin Backus Pascal Mamassian Alan Johnston Pawan Sinha Technical Manager Irving Biederman Frans Verstraten Phil Kellman Josh Solomon James Bisley Joan Carole Daniel Kersten George Sperling Geoff Boynton Nominating Exhibits Manager Fred Kingdom Jim Tanaka Angela Brown Rich Krauzlis Mike Tarr Committee David Burr Onsite Bart Krekelberg Jan Theeuwes Tony Norcia, Chair Patrick Cavanagh Kang Lee Bosco Tjan Wilson Geisler Staff Leonardo Chelazzi Dennis Levi Rufin VanRullen Richard Krauzlis Kerry Bosch Marvin Chun Margaret Livingstone Rufin Vogels Michael Morgan Janeen Fabulae Christos Joan Lopez-Moliner Rüdiger Mary Peterson Shellie Gallegos Constantinidis Zhong-Lin Lu von der Heydt Vince Gallegos Jody Culham Laurence Maloney William Warren Demo Night Linda Hacker Steve Dakin Ennio Mingolla Takeo Watanabe Cheryl Hoidal Brad Duchaine Committee Cathleen Moore Michael Webster Dustin Miller James Elder Gideon Caplovitz Shin’ya Nishida Andrew Welchman Katia Seabra Steve Engel Arthur Shapiro Aude Oliva David Whitney Shawn Sherbondy Jim Enns Karen Schloss Alice O’Toole Yaffa Yeshurun Russell Epstein Gennady Erlikhman Christopher Pack Cong Yu Marc Ernst Marc Pomplun Qasim Zaidi Brett Fajen Jenny Read Sponsors We thank our 2016 sponsors for their generous support 4 Vision Sciences Society Meeting Schedule Wednesday, May 11 9:00 am - 6:00 pm Computational and Mathematical Models Dolphin Beach Resort, 4900 Gulf Blvd. in Vision (MODVIS) (VSS Satellite) (Cypress Room) Offsite Thursday, May 12 9:00 am - 6:00 pm Computational and Mathematical Models Horizons in Vision (MODVIS) (VSS Satellite) Friday, May 13 7:00 am - 6:00 pm Registration Open Grand Palm Colonnade 7:30 am – 9:30 pm Cyber Lounge / Social Lounge Blue Heron / Jacaranda Hall 8:30 am Coffee Service Grand Palm Colonnade and Courtyard 9:00 am - 12:00 pm Computational and Mathematical Models Horizons in Vision (MODVIS) (VSS Satellite) 11:30 am – 12:00 pm Coffee Break Grand Palm Colonnade, Courtyard and Pavilion 12:00 - 2:00 pm Symposium Session 1 Talk Room 1-2 and Pavilion 2:00 - 2:30 pm Coffee Break Grand Palm Colonnade, Courtyard and Pavilion 2:30 - 4:30 pm Symposium Session 2 Talk Room 1-2 and Pavilion 4:30 - 5:00 pm Coffee Break Grand Palm Colonnade, Courtyard and Pavilion 5:00 - 7:00 pm
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Long-Term Memory Vs. Short-Term Memory
    Long-term Memory vs. Short-term Memory Chapter 6 Learning Objective Topics ¢ Divisions of LTM ¢ Are LTM and STM two separate processes? ¢ How do we get information from STM into LTM? l Modal Model l Levels of Processing 1 Division of LTM Working Memory Autobiographical Prospective Other types: source memory, false memory, meta-memory, memory for discourse, memory for pictures, everyday memory, recent vs. remote LTM … 2 Modal Model Decay Focus of Today’s Class… Decay 3 Focus of Today’s Class… Decay Questions for Today Are short term and long term memory are two distinct processes?" " " How do we get information from short term memory into long term memory?" " 4 Nature of Short-Term Memory vs. Long-Term Try to remember these words as I read them aloud Nature of Short-Term Memory vs. Long-Term Now write down all the words that you remember from the list We will tally responses for each word (excel sheet) 5 Two distinct memory stores? ¢! Why does this happen?" ¢! What were you doing to remember them?" ¢! How does this relate to short and long term memory?" Evidence for two distinct memory stores Serial position effect in recall Primacy effect = LTM Recency effect = STM 6 Primacy Effect: Rehearsal" ¢! What do you think would happen if you slowed down the presentation rate?" 7 Evidence for two distinct memory stores Primacy effect boosted by slower Recency effect presentation unaffected by rate presentation rate ¢! What do you think would happen if we added a 30 second delay after I read the list?" 8 Evidence for two distinct memory stores
    [Show full text]
  • Vision Science Meets Visualization
    Vision Science Meets Visualization Organizers: Christine Nothelfer Zoya Bylinskii Madison Elliott Cindy Xiong Danielle Albers Szafir Northwestern Massachusetts Institute University of British Northwestern University of Colorado University of Technology Columbia University Boulder Panelists: Ronald Rensink Todd Horowitz Steven Franconeri Karen Schloss Ruth Rosenholtz University of British National Cancer Northwestern University of Massachusetts Institute Columbia Institute University Wisconsin-Madison of Technology presenters each year. Recent developments in these research ABSTRACT topics (e.g., in visual attention, scene understanding, and quantity Vision science can explain what people see when looking at a perception) can inform our understanding of how people interpret visualization--what data features people attend to, what statistics visualized information. However, historically, few VIS they ascertain, and what they ultimately remember. These findings researchers have attended VSS, and few vision scientists have have significant relevance to visualization and can guide effective attended IEEE VIS. This limited overlap has stifled the exchange techniques and design practices. Intersections between of information, ideas, and questions between the two visualization and vision science have traditionally built upon communities. topics such as visual search, color perception, and pop-out. However, there is a broader space of vision science concepts that Further, while crossover between vision science and visualization could inform and explain ideas in visualization but no dedicated is not without precedent (e.g., work by Cleveland & McGill [2] venue for collaborative exchanges between the two communities. and Healey & Enns [8]), these interactions can benefit from This panel provides a space for this exchange by bringing five exposure to a broader set of vision science topics, such as object vision science experts to IEEE VIS to survey the modern vision tracking, ensemble statistics, and visual crowding.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Human Color Vision
    CAMC01 9/30/04 3:13 PM Page 1 1 Human Color Vision Color appearance models aim to extend basic colorimetry to the level of speci- fying the perceived color of stimuli in a wide variety of viewing conditions. To fully appreciate the formulation, implementation, and application of color appearance models, several fundamental topics in color science must first be understood. These are the topics of the first few chapters of this book. Since color appearance represents several of the dimensions of our visual experience, any system designed to predict correlates to these experiences must be based, to some degree, on the form and function of the human visual system. All of the color appearance models described in this book are derived with human visual function in mind. It becomes much simpler to understand the formulations of the various models if the basic anatomy, physiology, and performance of the visual system is understood. Thus, this book begins with a treatment of the human visual system. As necessitated by the limited scope available in a single chapter, this treatment of the visual system is an overview of the topics most important for an appreciation of color appearance modeling. The field of vision science is immense and fascinating. Readers are encouraged to explore the liter- ature and the many useful texts on human vision in order to gain further insight and details. Of particular note are the review paper on the mechan- isms of color vision by Lennie and D’Zmura (1988), the text on human color vision by Kaiser and Boynton (1996), the more general text on the founda- tions of vision by Wandell (1995), the comprehensive treatment by Palmer (1999), and edited collections on color vision by Backhaus et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8: Memory SW
    Chapter 8: Memory SW By: Stephen E. Wisecarver Chapter 8: Memory SW By: Stephen E. Wisecarver Online: < http://cnx.org/content/col11816/1.1/ > OpenStax-CNX This selection and arrangement of content as a collection is copyrighted by Stephen E. Wisecarver. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Collection structure revised: June 8, 2015 PDF generated: June 9, 2015 For copyright and attribution information for the modules contained in this collection, see p. 37. Table of Contents 1 8.0 Introduction to Memory .....................................................................1 2 8.1 How Memory Functions ......................................................................5 3 8.2 Parts of the Brain Involved with Memory .................................................13 4 8.3 Problems with Memory .....................................................................19 5 8.4 Ways to Enhance Memory ..................................................................27 Glossary .............................................................................................32 Index ................................................................................................35 Attributions .........................................................................................37 iv Available for free at Connexions <http://cnx.org/content/col11816/1.1> Chapter 1 8.0 Introduction to Memory1 Figure 1.1: Photographs can trigger our memories and bring past experiences back to
    [Show full text]
  • Pnas11052ackreviewers 5098..5136
    Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2013 The PNAS editors would like to thank all the individuals who dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal by serving as reviewers in 2013. Their generous contribution is deeply appreciated. A Harald Ade Takaaki Akaike Heather Allen Ariel Amir Scott Aaronson Karen Adelman Katerina Akassoglou Icarus Allen Ido Amit Stuart Aaronson Zach Adelman Arne Akbar John Allen Angelika Amon Adam Abate Pia Adelroth Erol Akcay Karen Allen Hubert Amrein Abul Abbas David Adelson Mark Akeson Lisa Allen Serge Amselem Tarek Abbas Alan Aderem Anna Akhmanova Nicola Allen Derk Amsen Jonathan Abbatt Neil Adger Shizuo Akira Paul Allen Esther Amstad Shahal Abbo Noam Adir Ramesh Akkina Philip Allen I. Jonathan Amster Patrick Abbot Jess Adkins Klaus Aktories Toby Allen Ronald Amundson Albert Abbott Elizabeth Adkins-Regan Muhammad Alam James Allison Katrin Amunts Geoff Abbott Roee Admon Eric Alani Mead Allison Myron Amusia Larry Abbott Walter Adriani Pietro Alano Isabel Allona Gynheung An Nicholas Abbott Ruedi Aebersold Cedric Alaux Robin Allshire Zhiqiang An Rasha Abdel Rahman Ueli Aebi Maher Alayyoubi Abigail Allwood Ranjit Anand Zalfa Abdel-Malek Martin Aeschlimann Richard Alba Julian Allwood Beau Ances Minori Abe Ruslan Afasizhev Salim Al-Babili Eric Alm David Andelman Kathryn Abel Markus Affolter Salvatore Albani Benjamin Alman John Anderies Asa Abeliovich Dritan Agalliu Silas Alben Steven Almo Gregor Anderluh John Aber David Agard Mark Alber Douglas Almond Bogi Andersen Geoff Abers Aneel Aggarwal Reka Albert Genevieve Almouzni George Andersen Rohan Abeyaratne Anurag Agrawal R. Craig Albertson Noga Alon Gregers Andersen Susan Abmayr Arun Agrawal Roy Alcalay Uri Alon Ken Andersen Ehab Abouheif Paul Agris Antonio Alcami Claudio Alonso Olaf Andersen Soman Abraham H.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual Report 2002/2003 The academic year 2002/2003 was marked by continued excellence in research, teaching and outreach, in service of humanity’s intellectual, social and technological needs. Provost & President’s Outreach Statement In accordance with its UCL is committed to founding principles, UCL using its excellence in continued to share the research and teaching highest quality research to enrich society’s and teaching with those intellectual, cultural, who could most benefit scientific, economic, from it, regardless of environmental and their background or medical spheres. circumstances. See page 2 See page 8 Research & Teaching Achievements UCL continued to UCL’s academics challenge the boundaries conducted pioneering of knowledge through its work at the forefront programmes of research, of their disciplines while ensuring that the during this year. most promising students See page 12 could benefit from its intense research-led teaching environment. See page 4 The UCL Community Financial Information UCL’s staff, students, UCL’s annual income has alumni and members of grown by almost 30% in Council form a community the last five years. The which works closely largest component of this together to achieve income remains research the university’s goals. grants and contracts. See page 18 See page 24 Supporting UCL Contacting UCL UCL pays tribute to Join the many current those individuals and and former students and organisations who staff, friends, businesses, have made substantial funding councils and financial contributions agencies, governments, in support of its research foundations, trusts and and teaching. charities that are See page 22 involved with UCL. See page 25 Developing UCL With the help of its supporters, UCL is investing in facilities fit for the finest research and teaching in decades to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts (PDF)
    Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society — Volume 4 — November 1999 40th Annual Meeting — November 18–21, 1999 — Los Angeles, California Posters 1–6 Thursday Evening Papers and Posters Presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society Century Plaza Hotel, Los Angeles, California November 18–21, 1999 POSTER SESSION I other animal forms (e.g., birds, cats, horses). We will also report vari- California Showroom, Thursday Evening, 7:00–8:30 ations across these displays in the orientation specificity of sensitiv- ity, discussing possible implications for accounts of biological mo- •PERCEPTION • tion perception. (1) (4) Deficits of Complex Form Perception and Attention in a Patient Representing the “What” and the “Where” of Undetected With Partial Achromatopsia. RACHEL E. SHOUP, University of Change. IAN M. THORNTON, Nissan Cambridge Basic Research, California, Davis, & JAMIE A. MAZER & JACK L. GALLANT, & DIEGO FERNANDEZ-DUQUE, University of Oregon—Studies of University of California, Berkeley—Physiological studies in non- change blindness demonstrate that we are seldom aware of everything human primates suggest that cortical area V4 is important for the per- that is before our eyes. However, these studies may be telling us more ception of both color and form. Cells in V4 are also modulated by at- about the limits of visual awareness than about the limits of visual rep- tention. Because humans with V4 lesions typically exhibit severe resentation. Specifically, we have suggested that the explicit reports achromatopsia, most studies of these patients have focused on color used for most change blindness tasks underestimate the visual system’s vision. We assessed form vision and attention in a patient, A.R., with ability to represent change.
    [Show full text]
  • Color Vision and Night Vision Chapter Dingcai Cao 10
    Retinal Diagnostics Section 2 For additional online content visit http://www.expertconsult.com Color Vision and Night Vision Chapter Dingcai Cao 10 OVERVIEW ROD AND CONE FUNCTIONS Day vision and night vision are two separate modes of visual Differences in the anatomy and physiology (see Chapters 4, perception and the visual system shifts from one mode to the Autofluorescence imaging, and 9, Diagnostic ophthalmic ultra- other based on ambient light levels. Each mode is primarily sound) of the rod and cone systems underlie different visual mediated by one of two photoreceptor classes in the retina, i.e., functions and modes of visual perception. The rod photorecep- cones and rods. In day vision, visual perception is primarily tors are responsible for our exquisite sensitivity to light, operat- cone-mediated and perceptions are chromatic. In other words, ing over a 108 (100 millionfold) range of illumination from near color vision is present in the light levels of daytime. In night total darkness to daylight. Cones operate over a 1011 range of vision, visual perception is rod-mediated and perceptions are illumination, from moonlit night light levels to light levels that principally achromatic. Under dim illuminations, there is no are so high they bleach virtually all photopigments in the cones. obvious color vision and visual perceptions are graded varia- Together the rods and cones function over a 1014 range of illu- tions of light and dark. Historically, color vision has been studied mination. Depending on the relative activity of rods and cones, as the salient feature of day vision and there has been emphasis a light level can be characterized as photopic (cones alone on analysis of cone activities in color vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. MASAUD ANSARI REMEMBRING and FORGETTING: MEMORY (Lecture Series-1)
    REMEMBRING AND FORGETTING: MEMORY (Lecture Series-1) B.A. Ist (Subsidiary) (Fundamental/General Psychology) BY Dr. MASAUD ANSARI Department of Psychology, A.P.S.M. College, Barauni L. N. M. University, Darbhanga 19th M A Y 2 0 2 0 Memory Memory is learning that has persisted over time, information that has been stored and can be retrieved. To a psychologist, evidence that learning persists takes three forms: ▪ Recall—retrieving information that is not currently in your conscious awareness but that was learned at an earlier time. A fill-in-the-blank question tests your recall. ▪ Recognition—identifying items previously learned. A multiple-choice question tests your recognition. ▪ Relearning—learning something more quickly when you learn it a second or later time. When you study for a final exam or engage a language used in early childhood, you will relearn the material more easily than you did initially. Be thankful for memory. We take it for granted, except when it malfunctions. But it is our memory that accounts for time and defines our life. It is our memory that enables us to recognize family, speak our language, find our way home, and locate food and water. It is our memory that enables us to enjoy an experience and then mentally replay and enjoy it again. Our shared memories help bind us together as Irish or Aussies, as Serbs or Albanians. And it is our memory that occasionally pits us against those whose offenses we cannot forget. Conti… At the other extreme are people who would be gold medal winners in a memory Olympics.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision Science and Adaptive Optics, the State of the Field
    Vision Research 132 (2017) 3–33 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Vision Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Vision science and adaptive optics, the state of the field ⇑ Susana Marcos a, John S. Werner b, Stephen A. Burns c, , William H. Merigan d, Pablo Artal e, David A. Atchison f, Karen M. Hampson g, Richard Legras h, Linda Lundstrom i, Geungyoung Yoon d, Joseph Carroll j, Stacey S. Choi k, Nathan Doble k, Adam M. Dubis l, Alfredo Dubra m, Ann Elsner c, Ravi Jonnal b, Donald T. Miller c, Michel Paques n, Hannah E. Smithson o, Laura K. Young o, Yuhua Zhang p, Melanie Campbell q, Jennifer Hunter d, Andrew Metha r, Grazyna Palczewska s, Jesse Schallek d, Lawrence C. Sincich p a Instituto de Optica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain b University of California, Davis, USA c Indiana University, Bloomington, USA d University of Rochester, New York, USA e Universidad de Murcia, Spain f Queensland University of Technology, Australia g University of Bradford University, UK h Université de Paris Sud, France i KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), Stockholm, Sweden j Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA k The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA l University College London, London, UK m Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA n Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris o University of Oxford, UK p University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA q University of Waterloo, Canada r University of Melbourne, Australia s Polgenix, Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA article info abstract Article history: Adaptive optics is a relatively new field, yet it is spreading rapidly and allows new questions to be asked Received 20 September 2016 about how the visual system is organized.
    [Show full text]
  • Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W
    Psychological Review Copyright 1984 by the 1984, Vol. 91, No. 2, 269-276 American Psychological Association, Inc. Theoretical Note Automatic and Controlled Processing Revisited Richard M. Shiffrin Walter Schneider Indiana University University of Illinois The theory of automatic and controlled processing outlined in Schneider and Shiffrin (1977) and in Shiffrin and Schneider (1977) is defended in the present note. We argue that the criticisms of Ryan (1983) range from irrelevant to incorrect, based on a brief review of data from the 1977 articles and on some more recent publications. The evidence Ryan discusses comes from the prememorized-list paradigm, a par- adigm that undoubtedly involves automatic and controlled processes but probably not automatic detection and controlled search. We argue that a variety of mechanisms consistent with our general theory, some automatic and some controlled, could be operating in the prememorized-list paradigm and can explain the observed results. A theory of automatic and controlled processing effortless process that is not limited by short-term was outlined and given empirical support in the memory capacity, is not under direct subject control, articles of Schneider and Shiffrin (1977) and Shiffrin and performs well-developed skilled behaviors. It and Schneider (1977). The characteristics of both typically develops when subjects process stimuli in types of processes were established through ex- consistent fashion over many trials; it is difficult to amination of particular examples of each of these suppress, modify, or ignore, once learned. Con- classes of processes. These examples, of critical im- trolled processing is often slow, generally serial, ef- portance in many search and attention tasks, were fortful, capacity limited, subject regulated, and is termed automatic detection and controlled search, used to deal with novel or inconsistent information.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Psychophysics Has Been Around Even Longer Than the Word Psychophysics
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Solomon, J. A. (2013). Visual Psychophysics. In: Dunn, S. (Ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Psychology. New York: OUP. This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/5032/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199828340-0128 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Visual Psychophysics Joshua A. Solomon 1 Introduction Paradigms for attacking the problem of how vision works continue to develop and mutate, and the boundary between them can be indistinct. Nonetheless, this bibliography represents an attempt to delineate one such paradigm: Visual Psychophysics. Unlike, for example, anatomical paradigms, the psychophysical paradigm requires a complete organism. Most of the studies discussed below involve human beings, but psychophysics can be used to study the vision of other organisms too. At minimum, the organism must be told or taught how to respond to some sort of stimulus.
    [Show full text]