DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K Amphenol Corporation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K Amphenol Corporation Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-10879 AMPHENOL CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) Delaware 22 -2785165 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492 203-265-8900 (Address of Principal Executive Offices, Zip Code, Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Class A Common Stock, $.001 par value New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (Title of each Class) (Name of each Exchange on Which Registered) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one): Large accelerated filer , Accelerated filer , Non -accelerated filer , Smaller reporting company . Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No The aggregate market value of Amphenol Corporation Class A Common Stock, $.001 par value, held by non-affiliates was approximately $6,056 million based on the reported last sale price of such stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2010. As of January 31, 2011, the total number of shares outstanding of Registrant’s Class A Common Stock was 175,933,568. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement, which is expected to be filed within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report, are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof. Table of Contents INDEX Page PART I 3 Item 1. Business 3 General 3 Business Segments 5 International Operations 6 Customers 6 Manufacturing 6 Research and Development 7 Trademarks and Patents 7 Competition 7 Backlog 7 Employees 8 Environmental Matters 8 Other 8 Cautionary Information for Purposes of Forward Looking Statements 9 Item 1A. Risk Factors 9 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 12 Item 2. Properties 12 Item 3. Legal Proceedings 12 Item 4. Removed and Reserved 13 PART II 13 Item 5. Market for the Registrant ’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 13 Item 6. Selected Financial Data 15 Item 7. Management ’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 16 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 26 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 28 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 28 Consolidated Statements of Income 29 Consolidated Balance Sheets 30 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Other Comprehensive Income 31 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow 32 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 33 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 53 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 53 Item 9B. Other Information 53 PART III 54 Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 54 Item 11. Executive Compensation 54 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder 54 Matters Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 54 Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 54 PART IV 55 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 55 Signature of the Registrant 57 Signatures of the Directors 57 2 Table of Contents PART I Item 1. Business General Amphenol Corporation (“Amphenol” or the “Company”) is one of the world’s largest designers, manufacturers and marketers of electrical, electronic and fiber optic connectors, interconnect systems and coaxial and high-speed specialty cable. The Company was incorporated in 1987. Certain predecessor businesses, which now constitute part of the Company, have been in business since 1932. The primary end markets for the Company’s products are: • communication systems for the converging technologies of voice, video and data communications; • a broad range of industrial applications including factory automation and motion control systems, medical and industrial instrumentation, mass transportation, alternative and traditional energy generation, natural resource exploration and traditional and hybrid- electrical automotive applications; and • commercial aerospace and military applications. The Company’s strategy is to provide its customers with comprehensive design capabilities, a broad selection of products and a high level of service on a worldwide basis while maintaining continuing programs of productivity improvement and cost control. For 2010, the Company reported net sales, operating income and net income attributable to Amphenol Corporation of $3,554.1 million, $700.4 million and $496.4 million, respectively. The table below summarizes information regarding the Company’s primary markets and end applications for the Company’s products in 2010: Information Technology & Commercial Aerospace Communications Industrial/Automotive & Military Percentage of Sales 60% 18% 22% (approximate) Primary End Applications Broadband Networks Alternative and traditional energy Military and Commercial • cable modems generation Aircraft • cable television networks Automobile on-board electronics • avionics • high-speed internet and safety systems • engine controls Factory automation • network switching equipment • flight controls Geophysical • set top converters • passenger related Heavy equipment systems High speed and traditional rail Telecommunications and Data • unmanned aerial Hybrid-electrical vehicles Communications vehicles Instrumentation • Military communications computers, personal computers and Mass transportation systems related peripherals Medical equipment • Missile systems data networking equipment Natural resource exploration • routers and switches Ordnance Radar systems • servers and storage systems Satellite and space programs Wireless Communication Systems • base stations • cell sites • smart mobile devices, including tablets • wireless handsets • wireless infrastructure equipment 3 Table of Contents The Company designs and manufactures connectors and interconnect systems, which are used primarily to conduct electrical and optical signals for a wide range of sophisticated electronic applications. The Company believes, based primarily on published market research, that it is the second largest connector and interconnect product manufacturer in the world. The Company has developed a broad range of connector and interconnect products for information technology and communications equipment applications including the converging voice, video and data communications markets. The Company offers a broad range of interconnect products for factory automation and motion control systems, machine tools, instrumentation and medical systems, mass transportation applications and automotive applications, including airbags, seatbelt pretensioners and other on-board automotive electronics. In addition, the Company is the leading supplier of high performance, military- specification, circular environmental connectors that require superior reliability and performance under conditions of stress and in hostile environments. These conditions are frequently encountered in commercial and military aerospace applications and other demanding industrial applications such as solar and wind power generation, oil exploration, medical equipment, hybrid-electrical vehicles and off-road construction. The Company is a global manufacturer employing advanced manufacturing processes. The Company designs, manufactures and assembles its products at facilities in the Americas, Europe, Asia and Africa. The Company
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waivers by Petitioner
    WAIVERS BY PETITIONER Waivers By Petitioner Petitioner Waiver Number Contact Numumber Waiver Status Status Date W (A) 1975-001 G 5/14/1975 W (A) 1975-001 G 5/14/1975 W (C) 1999-008 DE-SC02-99CH 10989 Gi 6/28/2000 W (C) 2001-001 DE-AC05-00OR22725 G1 5/23/2001 W (C) 2002-002 GI 10/15/2002 3M COMPANY W (A) 2000-012 DE-AC05-960R22464 GI 10/9/2001 W (A) 2004-038 DE-FC36-01AL67621 Gl 12/1/2004 3M INNOVATIVE PROPE W (A) 2003-002 DE-FC02-02CH 11111 GI 4/13/2004 A. B. CHANCE COMPAN W (1) 1978-029 C-170 WD 10/20/1980 ABB AIR PREHEATER, I W (A) 1993-024 G1 2/10/1994 ABB COMBUSTION ENG W (A) 1995-045 DE-FC36-95G01006 CL 12/22/1999 ABB POWER GENERATI W (A) 1995-035 GI 8/8/1996 ABB POWER T&D COMP W (A) 1998-016 G1 5/17/1999 ABB-CE COMPANY W (A) 1991-024 DE-AC04-76DP00789 GI 8/9/1993 ABENGOA BIOENERGY W (A) 2005-003 DE-FC36-03GO13142 P 1/14/2005 ACCELERATED DEPLO W (C) 1998-003 Gl 4/22/1998 ACUREX CORP. W (A) 1980-114 DE-FC02-80CS30264 G 1/22/1981 W (A) 1980-115 DE-FC02-80CS30265 G 1/22/1981 Wednesday, February 02, 2005 Page 1 of 155 Petitioner Waiver Number Contact Numumber Waiver Status Status Date W (A) 1980-116 DE-FC02-80CS30599 G 1/22/1981 ADA TECHNOLOGIES W (A) 2004-001 DE-FC26-04NT41988 GI 10/4/2004 ADELPHI UNIVERSITY W (A) 1978-072 CL 12/1/1978 W (1) 1978-052 EX-76-S-01-2437 G 10/9/1980 ADLER, HOWARD I.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction
    1. INTRODUCTION Honeywell Intemational Inc. (fonnerly AlliedSignal, Inc.; referred to herein as Honeywell), is conducting aremedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS) for Onondaga Lake, which is located near S)'Tacuse, New York (site definition is discussed in Section 1.2 of this RI). The RIfFS is being conducted under the direction of the State ofN ew York and pursuant to the terms of a Consent Decree (Index #89-CV -815) entered into with the State of New York dated January 9, 1992, and associated stipulations (Consent Decree). Onondaga Lake was placed on the USEP A National Priorities List (NFL) (CERCLIS ill number NYD986913580) on December 16, 1994. This NPL listing means that the lake is among the nation's highest priorities for remedial evaluation and responseunder the federal Superfillld law for ~iteswhere there has been a release ofhazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants. Honeywell submitted a draft RI report in May 1998. Upon review and comment by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEP A), the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), and the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH), the NYSDEC and the New York State Department of Law (NYSDOL) disapproved this draft document and provided comments to Ho~eywell in August 1999. After completing additional sampling in 1999 and 2000, Honeywell submitted a revised RI report in April 2001 (Exponent, 2001 c). This revised report was similarly disapproved by NYSDEC and NYSDOL in July 2001. Thereafter, pursuant to the Consent Decree, NYSDEC/T AMS Consultants, Inc. (TAMS) prepared this reMite of Honeywell' s revised RI report, with the assistance ofNYSDOH and USEP A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tex Users Group Newsletter Editor Barbarabeeton
    Computers can make it easier, quicker, and cheaper to print formal publications; individuals can do what was once practical only for organizations. As the computer increases the freedom of writers, so does it increase the responsibility of readers. John Shore The Sachertorte Algorithm and other antidotes to computer anxiety, Penguin Books, 1986, pp. 18, 20 THE TEX USERS GROUP NEWSLETTER EDITOR BARBARABEETON VOLUME7, NUMBER2 a JUNE,1986 PROVIDENCE RHODEISLAND U.S.A. 90 TUGboat, Volume 7 (1986), No. 2 TUGboat TUGboat Editorial Committee The communications of the TEX Users Group are Barbara Beeton, Editor published irregularly at Providence, Rhode Island, Maureen Eppstein, Associate Editor for and are distributed as a benefit of membership both Applications to individual and institutional members. Georgia K.M. Tobin, Associate Editor of Font Submissions to TUGboat are for the most part Forum reproduced with minimal editing, and any questions Patrick Ion, Associate Editor for Macros and regarding content or accuracy should be directed Problems to the authors, with an information copy to the David Fuchs, Associate Editor for Output Devices Editor. Helmut Jiirgensen, Associate Editor for Software Alan Hoenig and Mitch Pfeffer, Associate Editors Submitting Items for Publication for Typesetting on Personal Computers The deadline for submitting items for Vol. 7, No. 3, See page 91 far addresses. is August 25, 1986; the issue will be mailed in late October. Manuscripts should be submitted to a member of the TUGboat Editorial Committee. -Articles of general interest, those not covered by any of the editorial departments listed, and all items submitted on magnetic tape or as carnera-ready copy should be addressed to the Editor, Barbara Beeton.
    [Show full text]
  • Honeywell International Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K S ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 OR £ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-8974 Honeywell International Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 22-2640650 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 101 Columbia Road Morris Township, New Jersey 07962 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (973) 455-2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of Each Exchange Title of Each Class on Which Registered Common Stock, par value $1 per share* New York Stock Exchange Chicago Stock Exchange 1 9 /2% Debentures due June 1, 2016 New York Stock Exchange * The common stock is also listed on the London Stock Exchange. Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes S No £ Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes £ No S Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Service: Honeywell Aerospace
    Civil Service Leveraging its fixed-wing and military products, Honeywell Aerospace is expanding its offerings for civil rotorcraft By Robert W. Moorman espite the softening of civil The Honeywell HTS900 engine provides a high performance capability for the Bell 407HP, helicopter sales, Honeywell particularly at high altitude and hot ambient temperatures. (All photos courtesy of Honeywell DAerospace continues its long- Aerospace) term strategy to penetrate this sector Honeywell and Honeywell new helicopters supporting the oil and with numerous products ranging from BendixKing avionics, sensors and safety gas business particularly are down and sophisticated avionics and sensors products are on Leonardo Helicopters’ will remain flat for the next few years. to engines, safety and satellite-based AgustaWestland AW139, the Sikorsky The projected drop in deliveries will be connectivity technology. S-92 and S-76 variants, the Bell 429, and concentrated in the light-twin, medium- At a recent presentation, Honeywell on smaller, single-engine helicopters. twin and heavy-twin product classes. President and CEO Tim Mahoney said In addition to forward-fit products, In its 18th Annual Turbine Powered now was the time for the company to Honeywell has numerous supplemental Civil Helicopter Purchase Outlook, invest in the vertical-flight industry, so type certificates (STCs) for several Honeywell forecasts 4,300 to 4,800 as to be prepared when the oil and gas civil helicopters, including the Airbus civilian-use helicopters will be business recovers. Helicopters AS350, EC135 and Bell 407. delivered from 2016 to Among the key points in his Honeywell’s commitment to 2020, roughly 400 presentation, Mahoney noted that the the civil rotorcraft sector is laced helicopters lower company’s sales in avionics is up 6% with cautious optimism, than the 2015 five- vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Honeywell International Inc
    Section 1: 10-K (10-K) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-8974 Honeywell International Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 22-2640650 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 300 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (704) 627-6200 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Trading Title of Each Class Symbols Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value $1 per share* HON New York Stock Exchange 0.650% Senior Notes due 2020 HON 20 New York Stock Exchange 1.300% Senior Notes due 2023 HON 23A New York Stock Exchange 2.250% Senior Notes due 2028 HON 28A New York Stock Exchange * The common stock is also listed on the London Stock Exchange. Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC
    A Legacy Of Achievement … A Future With Promise The History Of Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, a member of the Knorr-Bremse group, develops and supplies leading-edge active safety technologies, air brake charging, and control systems and components under the Bendix ® brand name for medium and heavy duty trucks, tractors, trailers, buses, and other commercial vehicles throughout North America. An industry pioneer, employing more than 2,000 people, we are driven to deliver solutions for improved vehicle performance, safety, and overall operating costs. Our two primary market segments are Original Equipment Manufacturing (OEM) and Aftermarket (AM). Our OEM operation produces original equipment for major worldwide truck and engine manufacturers such as PACCAR, Detroit Diesel, Volvo, Mack, Daimler Trucks North America and Navistar International. The Aftermarket operations remanufacture a wide range of air brake components as well as stocking new replacement parts, both of which are distributed to independent distributors, OEM parts distribution centers and dealers, and government and foreign customers. In addition to our multi-building operations in Huntington, Indiana, manufacturing and distribution centers are strategically located across North America in Bowling Green, Kentucky; Acuña, Mexico; Sparks, Nevada; Mexico City, Mexico; along with Vancouver and Montreal, Canada. A Legacy Of Achievement Today’s Bendix ® automotive businesses began producing air brakes in a small corner of the Westinghouse Union Switch and Signal Company in Pennsylvania in the early 1920s. By 1930, Bendix Aviation Company and Westinghouse Air Brake joined forces to form Bendix- Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Company, located in Wilmerding, Pennsylvania to produce air brakes for heavy vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Apps & Handhelds
    BendixKing - 1911 to Today The history of the Bendix name runs parallel to the development of King Radio until the mid-1980s, when the Allied Corporation purchased Bendix Aviation and King Radio and combined the two to create the now-renowned BendixKing brand of avionics. In late 1985, the Allied Corporation merged with the Signal Companies to become Allied-Signal. The name was further modified to AlliedSignal in 1993 to reinforce a one-company image and signify the full integration of its business. In 1999, AlliedSignal merged with Honeywell and adopted the Honeywell name to take advantage of the company's universal recognition throughout the industries it serves, as well as in households around the world. Shortly after the merger was completed, Honeywell announced that due to pilot recognition and loyalty, it would retain the BendixKing brand for its general aviation avionics. Today, we are known as BendixKing by Honeywell. In 2011, BendixKing established new business operations in Albuquerque, NM. The tradition of leadership and innovation continues with BendixKing. Along with our new business operations we have renewed our brand — and our promise — to design, build and support the best-performing, most innovative and cost-effective avionics products available for general aviation. Apps & Handhelds Apps and handheld devices. Portable applications from BendixKing. Audio & Accessories The BendixKing family also includes audio consoles and accessories to complete your panel. Displays BendixKing display technologies are the leading edge in aerospace. BendixKing displays are the benchmark standard in general aviation. Flight Controls & Indicators A pioneer in the flight control and indicator industry. GPS Nav Comm & Transponders The BendixKing family of avionics offers a complete line of GPS, navigation, communication and identification products.
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-14-588, National Nuclear Security Administration
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives July 2014 NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Agency Expanded Use of Some Federal Oversight Reforms, but Is Still Determining Future Plans GAO-14-588 July 2014 NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Agency Expanded Use of Some Federal Oversight Highlights of GAO-14-588, a report to the Reforms, but Is Still Determining Future Plans Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found NNSA, a separately organized agency Key reforms at the National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA) Kansas within DOE, has had long-standing City Plant (KCP)—a site in Missouri that manufactures electronic and other problems managing its contracts and nonnuclear components of nuclear weapons—included (1) streamlining operating projects, which GAO has identified as requirements by replacing Department of Energy (DOE) requirements with being at high risk for fraud, waste, industry standards, where appropriate; (2) refocusing federal oversight to rely on abuse, and mismanagement. Both contractor performance data for lower-risk activities; and (3) establishing clear DOE and, specifically, NNSA, contractor goals and incentives. A 2008 review of the reforms reported nearly undertook initiatives in 2002 and 2003 $14 million in cost reductions were achieved at the site by implementing these to improve contractor performance reforms. through revised federal oversight and greater contractor accountability. In NNSA and KCP federal and contractor staff identified key factors that facilitated 2006, concerned that efforts were implementation of reforms at KCP, including the following: moving too slowly, the NNSA Administrator tasked its KCP Field • High-level support from NNSA and field office leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff, V. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
    Case 5:17-cv-01364-FJS-DEP Document 1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No.: 5:17-cv-1364 (FJS/DEP) ) HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. ) ) and ) ) ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK, ) ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff, the United States of America, by authority of the Attorney General of the United States and through the undersigned counsel, acting at the request of the Secretary of the United States Department of Interior (“DOI”), files this complaint and alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a civil action brought pursuant to Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), for damages for injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural resources, including the reasonable costs of assessing such injury, destruction, or loss, resulting from the releases of hazardous substances at or from defendants’ facilities at the Onondaga Lake Superfund Site (“Site”) in Syracuse, Onondaga County, New York. Case 5:17-cv-01364-FJS-DEP Document 1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 2 of 11 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the parties under 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 1345, and Sections 107(a) and 113(b) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(a) and 9613(b). 3. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and Section 113(b) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Implications of R&D Investment on Dynamic Business
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1989 Strategic Implications of R&D Investment on Dynamic Business Systems George F. Farrimond Jr. Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Farrimond, George F. Jr., "Strategic Implications of R&D Investment on Dynamic Business Systems" (1989). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 1399. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.1398 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF R&D INVESTMENT ON DYNAMIC BUSINESS SYSTEMS by GEORGE F. FARRIMOND, JR. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in SYSTEMS SCIENCE Portland State University ~1989 TO THE OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES: The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of George F. Farrimond presented July 10, 1989. r W er G. Ellis Richard M. Straw APPROVED: Martin Zwick, School of Systems Science C. William Savery, Int m Vice Provost for Graduate Studies and Research ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In a project of this magnitude, you find that many people lend support, assistance, expertise, and encouragement. I am indebted to all who so willingly gave of their time, talents, and support. I wish to especially thank Lewis N. Goslin, Dissertation Committee Chairperson, for his advice, review, inspiration, and long standing support.
    [Show full text]
  • EEOICPA PROGRAM – National Security Campus
    National Nuclear Security Administration Federal Manufacturing & Technologies EEOICPA PROGRAM – National Security Campus Stacey Eide | January 29, 2015 The Department of Energy’s National Security Campus is operated and managed by Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC under contract number DE-NA0000622 History National Nuclear Security Administration Federal Manufacturing & Technologies • The Kansas City Plant has been operated by the same Management & Operations (M & O) contractor since 1949 • The contractor’s company has changed names through mergers or acquisitions (Bendix, Allied, Allied-Signal and now Honeywell FM&T) • Bendix began to make parts for nuclear weapons at KCP in 1949 • Original building that housed KCP was constructed in 1942 to build aircraft engines • KCP moved to a new facility in 2013 • New facility is referred to as the National Security Campus (NSC) National Nuclear Security Administration Federal Manufacturing & Technologies A Rich Site History • 1922 - Kansas City Speedway • 1942 - Building construction and occupant - Pratt & Whitney Aircraft • 1949 - The Atomic Energy Commission and the Bendix Corporation HISTORY National Nuclear Security Administration Federal Manufacturing & Technologies 2011 – The Kansas City Plant Mergers and Honeywell - - - - - - - - 1983 – 1942 - Building construction and occupant - Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Allied 1999 – Honeywell 2012 – NSC 1949 - The Atomic Energy Commission and the Bendix Corporation National Nuclear Security Administration Federal Manufacturing & Technologies
    [Show full text]