Prisoner Reentry and Community Policing: Strategies for Enhancing Public Safety

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prisoner Reentry and Community Policing: Strategies for Enhancing Public Safety M E E T I N G S U M M A R Y Prisoner Reentry and Community Policing: Strategies for Enhancing Public Safety Reentry Roundtable Meeting The Urban Institute Washington, DC May 12-13, 2004 Prepared in partnership with the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice URBAN INSTITUTE research for safer communities Justice Policy Center URBAN INSTITUTE Justice Policy Center 2100 M Street NW Washington, DC 20037 http://www.urban.org © 2005 Urban Institute This project was supported by cooperative agreement # 2003-HS-WX-K044 by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the authors(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the United States Department of Justice, The Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Acknowledgments We would like to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of several colleagues and institutions in supporting this meeting of the Reentry Roundtable on Prisoner Reentry and Community Policing: Strategies for Enhancing Public Safety. Early in the life of this project we convened a planning meeting to seek the advice of law enforcement professionals. We are grateful for the contributions of that meeting from representatives of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, Police Foundation, National Sheriffs Association, and John Hopkins University Police Executive Leadership Program. At the Urban Institute, we benefited from the assistance of Meagan Funches, Dionne Davis, Demelza Baer, and Erica Lagerson. We are especially grateful for substantive and financial support provided by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS). Carl Peed, Director of the COPS Office, and his staff, Pamela Cammarata and Katherine Mc Quay, were enthusiastic and resourceful colleagues who believed that this meeting of the Roundtable would provide valuable guidance to police agencies and communities around the country. KAREN BECKMAN KELLY DEDEL JOHNSON AMY SOLOMON JEREMY TRAVIS History of the Reentry Roundtable Four years ago, the Urban Institute launched a major research and policy development initiative on the issue of prisoner reentry, with a broad substantive agenda that encompasses criminal justice policy as well as the impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, former prisoners, communities, and civil society. (A prospectus of Urban Institute’s reentry activities can be found at http://www.urban.org.) One of the key components of this initiative has been the creation of the Reentry Roundtable—a group of prominent academics, practitioners, community leaders, policymakers, advocates, and former prisoners that convenes about twice a year to push the envelope of research and practice. Additionally, about a hundred individuals (including practitioners, researchers, foundation officers, and community members) are invited to observe meetings of the Roundtable, and have been impressed with the breadth and stature of people who have joined the Roundtable to become part of a larger national network. The mission of the Roundtable is to develop new thinking about the issue of prisoner reentry, broadly defined. The first meeting of the Roundtable was held in the fall of 2000, with the purpose of exploring the many dimensions of the reentry issue. The Urban Institute commissioned discussion papers by leading academics examining the state of knowledge on this topic from a variety of perspectives—health, substance abuse, family, gender, race, employment, community capacity, and state criminal justice policies. Those papers (and two others on mental health and victims’ perspectives) were published in a special issue of Crime and Delinquency (Volume 47, Issue 3, 2001). They also provided the basis for the Urban Institute monograph entitled “From Prison to Home: The Dimensions and Consequences of Prisoner Reentry.” Following that meeting, the Urban Institute designed a multistate longitudinal study on prisoner reentry, entitled “Returning Home.” At the second meeting of the Roundtable in March 2001, the meeting focused attention on that design, with special attention to understanding the impact of reentry on family and community. The Urban Institute has completed the pilot study of Returning Home in Maryland and are implementing the full study in Illinois, Ohio, and Texas. The third session of the Roundtable, held in March 2002, focused on the role of the institutions of civil society in creating barriers and bridges to the successful reintegration of record numbers of former prisoners. The papers from that meeting have been published on the Urban Institute’s website (http://www.urban.org). The fourth meeting, held in December 2002, examined the nexus between prisoner reentry and health. Those papers were published in a special issue of the Journal of Correctional Health Care (Volume 10, Issue 3, Fall 2003). The fifth meeting examined the employment dimension of prisoner reentry. A monograph report based on the findings of that Roundtable is available though the Urban Institute website. The sixth meeting of the Reentry Roundtable, entitled “The Youth Dimensions of Prisoner Reentry: Youth Development and the Impacts of Incarceration and Reentry,” was held in San Francisco at the end of May 2003. The papers from this session were published in a special issue of Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice (Volume 2, Issue 1, 2004). The seventh meeting of the Reentry Roundtable, entitled “Housing, Homelessness, and Prisoner Reentry,” was held in October 2003. A monograph report based on the findings of that Roundtable will be available in Fall 2004. The eighth Reentry Roundtable was held in May 2004. With funding support from the Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing, this meeting of the Roundtable addressed the nexus between reentry and community policing in the context of public safety. What follows is a synopsis of the two-day discussion among academics, practitioners, service providers, and community leaders convened by the Urban Institute. These individuals were brought together to share their perspectives on the role of law enforcement in tackling the issue of prisoner reentry. This document reconstructs the discussion in the chronological order in which it unfolded, including highlights of presentations by the authors of commissioned papers and the discussions that flowed from them. In order to promote the free flow of ideas, it was decided that individuals’ names would not be attributed to comments given during the Roundtable discussion. The Urban Institute is in the process of producing a monograph report of this meeting that will be available in Spring 2005. Full-text versions of the commissioned working papers are available at http://www.urban.org May 2004 Reentry Roundtable ● Meeting Participants Alfred Blumstein, Carnegie Mellon University David Kennedy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University Patrick Bradley, Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety Susan Herman, National Center for Victims of Crime Jim Bueermann (Co-chair), Redlands, California Police Department Gary Hinzman, Sixth Judicial District Department of Correctional Services Edward Davis III, Lowell, Massachusetts Police Department Martin Horn, New York Department of Correction and Probation Walter Dickey, University of Wisconsin School of Law Edmund McGarrell, Michigan State University John Fitzgerald, Hampden County Alan Mobley, University of California-Irvine Massachusetts Jail and House of Correction Brenda Palms-Barber, North Lawndale (Chicago) Ellen Halbert, Travis County Texas, Office of Employment Network the District Attorney Carl Peed, Office of Community Oriented Michael Jacobson, John Jay College Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice of Criminal Justice Charles See, Lutheran Metropolitan Ministry Gary Johnson, Texas Department of Association Criminal Justice Michael Smith, University of Wisconsin Jean Johnson, Public Agenda School of Law Robert Johnson, Anoka County Minnesota, Faye Taxman, Bureau of Governmental County Attorney’s Office Research, University of Maryland Paul Joyce, Massachusetts Executive Office of Jeremy Travis (Co-chair), The Urban Institute Public Safety Reverend Steven Tucker, New Commandment George Kelling, Rutgers University - Newark Baptist Church, Washington, D.C. Contents Section I. Welcome and Meeting Overview....................................................................1 Section II. Presentations and Discussion ........................................................................3 Who Is Leaving Prison?...................................................................................................3 What Public Safety Risk Do Returning Prisoners Pose?.................................................9 Reentry and Safety from a Community Perspective......................................................13 Brick Walls Facing Returning Offenders ......................................................................16 The Roles of the Police in the Offender Reentry Process .............................................20 Placing Reentry in the Context of Sentencing Policy....................................................24 Promoting Public Safety: A Problem-Oriented Approach to Reentry...........................27 Turning “Weeds” into “Seeds”......................................................................................31 The Revolving Door: Exploring Public Attitudes Towards Prisoner Reentry ..............34 Section III.
Recommended publications
  • Conclusion 60
    Being Black, Being British, Being Ghanaian: Second Generation Ghanaians, Class, Identity, Ethnicity and Belonging Yvette Twumasi-Ankrah UCL PhD 1 Declaration I, Yvette Twumasi-Ankrah confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Table of Contents Declaration 2 List of Tables 8 Abstract 9 Impact statement 10 Acknowledgements 12 Chapter 1 - Introduction 13 Ghanaians in the UK 16 Ghanaian Migration and Settlement 19 Class, status and race 21 Overview of the thesis 22 Key questions 22 Key Terminology 22 Summary of the chapters 24 Chapter 2 - Literature Review 27 The Second Generation – Introduction 27 The Second Generation 28 The second generation and multiculturalism 31 Black and British 34 Second Generation – European 38 US Studies – ethnicity, labels and identity 40 Symbolic ethnicity and class 46 Ghanaian second generation 51 Transnationalism 52 Second Generation Return migration 56 Conclusion 60 3 Chapter 3 – Theoretical concepts 62 Background and concepts 62 Class and Bourdieu: field, habitus and capital 64 Habitus and cultural capital 66 A critique of Bourdieu 70 Class Matters – The Great British Class Survey 71 The Middle-Class in Ghana 73 Racism(s) – old and new 77 Black identity 83 Diaspora theory and the African diaspora 84 The creation of Black identity 86 Black British Identity 93 Intersectionality 95 Conclusion 98 Chapter 4 – Methodology 100 Introduction 100 Method 101 Focus of study and framework(s) 103
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Identities of Buraku Outcastes in Japan
    Educating Minds and Hearts to Change the World A publication of the University of San Francisco Center for the Volume IX ∙ Number 2 June ∙ 2010 Pacific Rim Copyright 2010 The Sea Otter Islands: Geopolitics and Environment in the East Asian Fur Trade >>..............................................................Richard Ravalli 27 Editors Joaquin Gonzalez John Nelson Shadows of Modernity: Hybrid Identities of Buraku Outcastes in Japan Editorial >>...............................................................Nicholas Mucks 36 Consultants Barbara K. Bundy East Timor and the Power of International Commitments in the American Hartmut Fischer Patrick L. Hatcher Decision Making Process >>.......................................................Christopher R. Cook 43 Editorial Board Uldis Kruze Man-lui Lau Syed Hussein Alatas: His Life and Critiques of the Malaysian New Economic Mark Mir Policy Noriko Nagata Stephen Roddy >>................................................................Choon-Yin Sam 55 Kyoko Suda Bruce Wydick Betel Nut Culture in Contemporary Taiwan >>..........................................................................Annie Liu 63 A Note from the Publisher >>..............................................Center for the Pacific Rim 69 Asia Pacific: Perspectives Asia Pacific: Perspectives is a peer-reviewed journal published at least once a year, usually in April/May. It Center for the Pacific Rim welcomes submissions from all fields of the social sciences and the humanities with relevance to the Asia Pacific 2130 Fulton St, LM280 region.* In keeping with the Jesuit traditions of the University of San Francisco, Asia Pacific: Perspectives com- San Francisco, CA mits itself to the highest standards of learning and scholarship. 94117-1080 Our task is to inform public opinion by a broad hospitality to divergent views and ideas that promote cross-cul- Tel: (415) 422-6357 Fax: (415) 422-5933 tural understanding, tolerance, and the dissemination of knowledge unreservedly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Significance of Slave Resistance by James Oakes
    Downloaded from http://hwj.oxfordjournals.org/ The Political Significance of Slave Resistance by James Oakes When W.E.B. DuBois wrote that it was 'the black worker. who brought at University of Iowa Libraries/Serials Acquisitions on May 31, 2015 civil war in America,' historians had yet to undertake the extraordinary studies of slavery that would eventually transform our understanding of all American history. Since then, scholars have discovered among the slaves a pattern of 'day-to-day resistance' which promises to give meaning and substance to DuBois's characterically astute observation. Slaves engaged in a variety of acts designed to ease their burdens and frustrate the masters' wills. They broke tools, feigned illness, deliberately malingered, 'stole' food, and manipulated the tensions between master and overseer. When pressed, the slaves took up more active forms of resistance: they became 'saucy', ran away, struck the overseer or even the master, and on rare occasions committed arson or joined in organized rebellions. And throughout the slave community a tradition of solidarity sustained and justified individual and collective acts of resistance.1 What has yet to be demonstrated is the political significance of slave resistance, and there are several reasons for this. Despite the methodo- logical and theoretical sophistication of the field, the ways in which social tensions were translated into political issues are still not well understood. Indeed, few historians have even attempted to trace the connections between everyday resistance and politics. Many scholars remain fixated on an artificial separation of morality from expediency in political analysis, as if 'morality' itself were not grounded in specific historical circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Vrs 0 NO 0 AA 000 619 Dec 70 RIEFEB71 LEVEL of AVAILAULITY 1E9 N Nic] AUTHOR
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH_, EDUCATICH, AND WELFARE OE FORM 6000, a/o OFFICE OF EDuCAT!ON ERIC ACC, NO. ERIC REPORTRESUME ED 042 936 ID DOCUMENT COPYRIGHTED/ YES 0 NO E) CH ACC. NO. P.A.PULL. DATE ISSUE ERIC REPROIVICTION RELEASE: vrs 0 NO 0 AA 000 619 Dec 70 RIEFEB71 LEVEL OF AVAILAULITY 1E9 n nic] AUTHOR TITLE Migrant Education. PREP-I9. SOURCE CODEINSTITUTION (SOURCE) Office of Education (DHEV), Washington, D. C. BBB03611 National Center for Educational Communication Sig.AG. CODESPONSORING AGENCY EDAS PRIOt CONTRACT NO GRANT NO. 0.25;2.40 REPORT NO. DUREAU NO. PREP-I9 AVAI LAB! LI TY -------------------- JOURNAL UITATION DESCRIPTIVE NOTE 46. DESCRIPTORS *Migrant Education; *4 Educational Services; Disadvantaged Groups; *Migrant Child Education; Migrant Problems; instructional Materials; 'reacher Education; *Interstate Programs; *Migrants -----_-__ - ......., IDnNTIFIERS *Puffin. Research into Educational Practice (PREP) ABSTRACT "A Synthesis of Current Research in Migrant Education" has recently beet prepared by Dr. James O. Schnur of New York State University, Geneseo, for the ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Smell Schools, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces. PREP kit No. 19, based upon this document, covers such areas as characteristics of migrants; educational problems; existent programs by trade level; educational tests; teacher training programs; end recommendations, both general aid curriculum - related. An annotated listing of current ERIC documents on instructional materials and gul..:.s for migrant education is Inciuded. The original document Is available from ERIC Document Rr:production Service (ORS) as ED 039 049. (Aqthor/LS) --....-- es. name PROBLEM PI"' RESEARCH Da-- EVALUATION 1.- PRACTICE1 (n> (NI S. °Z) mt PUTTING RESEARCH INTO EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE ZipBRIEF PMI No.
    [Show full text]
  • (Not) a Refugee? EMMA HADDAD
    EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES EUI Working Paper SPS No. 2004/6 Who is (not) a Refugee? EMMA HADDAD BADIA FIESOLANA, SAN DOMENICO (FI) All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author(s). © 2004 Emma Haddad Published in Italy in June 2004 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50016 San Domenico (FI) Italy www.iue.it EUI WP SPS 2004/6 Who is (not) a Refugee? Within the repertoire of humanitarian concern, refugee now constitutes one of the most powerful labels. From the first procedure of status determination – who is a refugee? – to the structural determinants of life chances which this identity then engenders, labels infuse the world of refugees. Roger Zetter1 In his provocatively entitled book, Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, Lakoff observes that “categorization is not a matter to be taken lightly”.2 We used to think of categories as unproblematic, “abstract containers with things either inside or outside the category”.3 Now we realise that this is far from the case, and the categorisation of concepts that are at once descriptive, normative and political would appear near impossible. The refugee ‘problem’ is, first and foremost, one of categorisation, of making distinctions. None of the discussions in the field – among politicians, policy workers or academics – can proceed without an idea of who exactly we are talking about when we use the label ‘refugee’. We employ the term ‘refugee’ freely and ‘refugeehood’ seems
    [Show full text]
  • TEACHERS' BELIEFS ABOUT GRADE RETENTION by Ellen
    TEACHERS' BELIEFS ABOUT GRADE RETENTION by Ellen Menaker Tomchin Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Educational Research and Evaluation APPROVED: 7 Jckes C. Imp=;r~,\ Chair \ , , . , ·J~net K .. lawyers Lee M. Wolfle( March 1989 Blacksburg, Virginia TEACHERS' BELIEFS ABOUT GRADE RETENTION by Ellen Menaker Tomchin Committee Chair: James C. Impara Educational Research and Evaluation (ABSTRACT) A multimethod approach was used to gain a better understanding of teachers' beliefs about retention in grades K-7. The participants in this study were the 135 classroom and specialty teachers in one school division (with six elementary schools, K-7). Two survey instruments were developed: (a) the Teacher Retention Belief Questionnaire designed to obtain teachers' explicit beliefs about retention, and (b) the Retention Decision Simulation designed to indicate the influence of .academic performance, social maturity, ability, gender, size and age on the decision to retain students. Interviews. were conducted with 36 classroom teachers representing a cross s~ction of grade levels and retention practices to discover how teachers make retention decisions. Findings suggest that teachers at all grade levels believe retention is an acceptable school practice and one they reserve the right to use. They believe retention prevents students from facing failure in the next higher grade. Teachers at all grade levels share common beliefs about the benefits for students retained in grades K-3, but are less certain about the positive effects of retaining students in grades 4-7. Academic performance of the student is a key factor in determining whether a student will be promoted, but a number of other factors including maturity, ability, age, size, and effort, also influence teachers' decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cleansing of the Temple in the Fourth Gospel As a Call to Action for Social Justice
    Gardner-Webb University Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University MA in Religion Theses Department of Religious Studies and Philosophy 2014 The leC ansing of the Temple in the Fourth Gospel as a call to action for social justice Douglas Thompson Goodwin Gardner-Webb University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/religion_etd Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Goodwin, Douglas Thompson, "The leC ansing of the Temple in the Fourth Gospel as a call to action for social justice" (2014). MA in Religion Theses. 1. https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/religion_etd/1 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Religious Studies and Philosophy at Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University. It has been accepted for inclusion in MA in Religion Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University. For more information, please see Copyright and Publishing Info. THE CLEANSING OF THE TEMPLE IN THE FOURTH GOSPEL AS A CALL TO ACTION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE By Douglas Thompson Goodwin A thesis submitted to the faculty of Gardner-Webb University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Religious Studies and Philosophy Boiling Springs, NC 2014 Approved by: ___________________________ ___________________________ Scott Shauf, Advisor Kent Blevins, MA Coordinator ___________________________ ___________________________ James McConnell, Reader Eddie Stepp, Department Chair ___________________________ Steven Harmon, Reader GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY BOILING SPRINGS, NORTH CAROLINA THE CLEANSING OF THE TEMPLE IN THE FOURTH GOSPEL AS A CALL TO ACTION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE SUBMITTED TO DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming and Social Exclusion: the Outcast and the Outsider
    Naming and Social Exclusion: The Outcast and the Outsider Between the Empires: Society in India 300 BCE to 400 CE Patrick Olivelle Print publication date: 2006 Print ISBN-13: 9780195305326 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2011 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305326.001.0001 Naming and Social Exclusion: The Outcast and the Outsider Aloka Parasher-Sen DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305326.003.0016 Abstract and Keywords This chapter discusses the terms “outcast” and “outsider” as well as naming and social exclusion and begins with quotes from Michel de Certeau and B. R. Ambedkar. Social exclusion has been much written about in the past, but not in the context of how naming as a process interjected to define linkage between those who named and those who were named. Looking critically at naming in the present context provides space for understanding the multiple nodes of social exclusion, each in turn, throwing up a series of other names apparently synonymous to each other, yet different in their localization in time and space. This sort of flowering out from a strong linear stem enables the chapter to pattern and map the complex relationship between hierarchy and diversity in the social landscape of the subcontinent during a period of some of the most critical centuries in its evolution that has been defined as the period “between the empires.” Keywords: outcast, outsider, naming, social exclusion, Michel de Certeau, B. R. Ambedkar, between the empires The existence of the “other” in any form opens up a rift and this has to be located in language.—Michel de Certeau1 Page 1 of 57 Naming and Social Exclusion: The Outcast and the Outsider If someone asks you what your caste is, you say you are a Chokhamelā or Harijan; but you do not say you are a Mahār.
    [Show full text]
  • Why We Need a Global Partnership to End Modern Slavery
    DR JAMES COCKAYNE 1 DECEMBER 2015 Unshackling Development Why we need a global partnership to end modern slavery Cover:2 A weaver works on a handloom at a sari workshop in Kardhana Village in Varanasi district of Uttar Pradesh, India. The weavers work for 10 hours a day and get an average of INR 300-INR 350 ($4.8 - $5.6) for weaving a Banarasi silk saree - it takes an average of 3 days to complete one sari. © United Nations University, 2015. ISBN 978-92-808-9015-0 Author: Dr James Cockayne Particular thanks for editorial and publications support go to: Attanayake Design, Andrés Esteban Ochoa, Nick Grono, Leni Kinzli, Nancy Roberts, and Meghan Walsh. Thanks are also due to the following for valuable input during research and drafting: Megha Amrith, Jean Baderschneider, Kevin Bales, Stefan Barriga, Valeria Bello, Urmila Bhoola, Susan Bissell, Olivia Caeymaex, Hannah Cooper, Rachel Davis, John de Boer, Rafael de Bustamente, Mike Dottridge, Sebastian von Einsiedel, , Juliette Faure, Zoe Fortune, Nick Grono, Fergus Hanson, René Holbach, Karen Hung, Kevin Hyland, Scott Jerbi, Siddharth Kara, Stephen Lamony, Bob Last, David Malone, Ed Marcum, Phil Marshall, Lawrence Mendenhall, Aidan McQuade, Parvati Nair, Joris Oldenziel, Bill Pace, Kari Panaccione, Anne Poorta, Grace Pringle, Clancy Rudeforth, Leonardo Sakamoto, Julian Schon, Gulnara Shahinian, Simon Steyne, Antonia Strachwitz, Zoltán Turbék, Dan Vexler, Maarit Virenius-Varela, Summer Walker, Christian Wenaweser, Lene Wendland, Ali Mahamat Zene. Cover image: Sanjit Das (c) Legatum Limited 2015. Table of Contents 1 3 Abbreviations Boxes 4 Executive Summary 14 1. Slavery today 16 2. Measuring slavery 7 Recommendations 20 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Forsaken People
    Hugvísindasvið Japan‘s Forsaken People Burakumin in contemporary society Ritgerð til B.A.-prófs Kristín Mist Sigurbjörnsdóttir Janúar 2012 Háskóli Íslands Hugvísindasvið Japanskt mál og menning Japan‘s Forsaken People Burakumin in contemporary society Ritgerð til B.A.-prófs Kristín Mist Sigurbjörnsdóttir Kt.: 070587-2469 Leiðbeinandi: Gunnella Þorgeirsdóttir Janúar 2012 Abstract The Burakumin is a minority group in Japan that has, since ancient times, been suffering from occupational and social discrimination from the grand majority of Japanese citizens. There is nothing that visually or technically distinguishes them from the rest of the mainstream community. Trivial things like occupation or a specific location played a significant part in the discrimination against the Burakumin from pre-Nara times to modern day civilization. Occupations that dealt with death were considered contaminated and resulted with the exclusion and avoidance of the Burakumin from common villages. This thesis asks the question whether such or similar discrimination still exists in a society that claims to be as close to homogeneous as is possible. In order to obtain such an answer, first it is necessary to dig deeper into the origin of the problem, starting at the medieval period in Japan and then steadily work our way up, to the present day Japan. The history of the prejudice will be examined from early historical background as well as the religious origins pertaining to the Buraku discrimination and will end at couple of years after the Meiji Restoration, where the government issued the Emancipation Edict in 1871. After the introduction of the Emancipation Edict, the focus is on the numerous actions that the Burakumin took in order to free themselves from their plight, starting with their own and then ending with the government‟s aid when its legal actions put forth the Special Measures Law in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Buraku Mondai in Japan: Historical and Modern Perspectives and Directions for the Future*
    Buraku Mondai in Japan: Historical and Modern Perspectives and Directions for the Future* Emily A. Su-Ian Reber** INTRODUCTION Arguments: An Overview The current state of legal, political, and sociological affairs in Japan con- stitutes an unfit stage for the eradication of discrimination against burakumin and the improvement of socioeconomic conditions among burakumin. First, federal law affords no protection to victims of discrimination1 : no anti- discrimination law exists, and access to certain government documents that can alert prospective employers and marriage partners to one's family lineage is not adequately restricted.2 Second, the limited nature of debate on buraku mondai constrains the possibility of a democratic and resourceful solution to the problem. Two opposing political organizations dominate the discourse regarding buraku mondai. Moreover, many people in Japan believe the best remedy for prejudice and discrimination is to ignore these problems. Third, the form of political redress regarding buraku mondai ironically propogates, while in other ways counters, discrimination against burakumin. Single bu- raku organizations, varying by community, but most often the Buraku Kaihi D6mei, or Buraku Liberation League (BLL), have been delegated almost full control over the administration of government-sponsored programs for bura- kumin. The BLL (nearly exclusively) offers the available relief to victims of * Portions of this Note have appeared in the March 1998 issue of the JoURNAL OF DOwA-MoNDAI [20 DOwA-M ONDAI KENKYO (JouRNAL OF DOwA-MoNDAi) 45 (1998)]. The editors would like to thank Professor Yoshiro Nabeshima of the Dowa Mondai Research Institute at Osaka City University for his permission to reproduce these portions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Burakumin Myth of Everyday Life: Reformulating Identity In
    From Subnational to Micronational: Buraku Communities and Transformations in Identity in Modern and Contemporary Japan Rositsa Mutafchieva East Asian Studies McGill University, Montreal April 2009 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the PhD degree © Rositsa Mutafchieva 2009 1 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................... 5 Introduction: Burakumin: A Minority in Flux ............................................................ 8 Chapter One: Moments in the History of Constructing Outcast Spaces ......... 19 Chapter Two: Three Buraku Communitiees, Three Different Stories ............... 52 Chapter Three: Instructions Given: ―Building a Nation = Building a Community‖ .............................................................................................................. 112 Chapter Four: The Voices of the Buraku ............................................................. 133 Chapter Five: ―Community Building‖ Revisited................................................... 157 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 180 Appendix ................................................................................................................... 192 Bibliography.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]