Luhansk Oblast Subnational Cluster Meeting Severodonetsk 20 June 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Luhansk Oblast Subnational Cluster Meeting Severodonetsk 20 June 2018 Luhansk Oblast Subnational Cluster Meeting Severodonetsk 20 June 2018 Agenda: 1. Roundtable introduction of Participants 2. Review of the previous meeting decisions 3. Goals and benefits of the Shelter Cluster 4. Interactive tools to improve participation and involvement 5. Focal points for past winterization 2017-2018 6. New damages update 7. Update from Partners on current Shelter Programs 8. AOB and Wrap-up Present: UNHCR, ADRA Ukraine, Caritas, ICRC, NRC, Proliska, UN OCHA, MinTOT/Luhansk Reviewing Previous Action Points Review of action points from the previous Subnational meeting: Action point Who Status Agencies to appointfocal points for Winterization Humanitarian partners Ongoing Agencies to share success stories or important information for Humanitarian partners Ongoing Factsheet The Cluster reminded again agencies to contribute to the Cluster quarterly Factsheet with their field notes, success stories, photos etc. In addition, the Cluster requested partners to share their PDMs for the preparation of the new winterization recommendations for 2018-2019. Newly damaged houses The Subnational Coordinator updated GCA Luhansk partners with the statistics on newly NGCA 26 damaged houses. Luhansk 14% 6 3% Statistics for May 2018 186 houses were reported as damaged in NGCA the month of May, this year: 83 (45%) in GCA Donetsk GCA and 103 (55%) in NGCA. Donetsk 97 57 52% 31% The Subnational Co-ordinator presented also a calendar with the distribution of the incidents in each day of the month: 2018 Calendar of Incidents and Damages (inhabited houses only) Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday 1 2 D.O.:OlenivkaN 3 D.O.:Zaitseve, 4 D.O.: Gorlivka 5 D.O.:Dokucha 6 D.O.: GCA Donetskiy, NGCA ievsk NGCA, Holmivskyi Dokuchaievsk Pyshevyk NGCA, NGCA, GCA Mykolaivka Zhovanka, Zaitseve GCA Mayorsk, L.O.:Zolote GCA 2 houses damaged 18 houses demaged 2 houses damaged 4 houses damaged 7 houses damaged 7 8 L.O.:Loskutiv ka 9 L.O.:Katerinivka 10 D.O.: Pivdene 11 D.O.:Zaitsevo, 12 D.O.: Horlivka 13 D.O.: GCA, D.O.: GCA, GCA Spartak NGCA NGCA Dokuchaiev sk, Horliv ka, D.O.:Zaitseve Shy roka Balka Zaitsev e NGCA GCA NGCA, Zalizne GCA 39 houses damaged 3 houses damaged 1 house damaged 4 houses damaged 14 houses damaged 5 houses damaged 14 15 D.O.: 16 D.O.: Horlivka 17 D.O.: Sakhanka 18 D.O.: Pikuzy, 19 D.O.: Toretsk, 20 D.O.: Zaitseve Novhorodske, NGCA, NGCA, Donetsk,Horli Zaitseve GCA NGCA/GCA May Nelipivka GCA Mykolaivka, Svitlodarsk vka NGCA, 2018 Holmivsky, GCA Toretsk GCA Vozdvyzhenka L.O.: GCA L.O.: Kraikavka Lugansk NGCA 12 houses damaged 9 houses damaged 6 houses damaged 15 houses damaged 4 houses damaged 4 houses damaged 21 D.O.: Horlivka 22 D.O.: Pikuzy, 23 24 D.O.: Zaitseve 25 D.O.: Horlivka, 26 27 NGCA, Avdiivka, Sakhanka NGCA/GCA Dokuchaievsk Marinka, NGCA, NGCA, Toretsk Zaitseve Marinka GCA GCA 8 houses damaged 4 houses damaged 3 houses damaged 6 houses damaged 28 D.O.: 29 D.O.: 30 D.O.: 31 D.O.: D.O. Chigii Chermalyk Chermalyk Dokuchaievsk Chermalyk GCA GCA L.O.: GCA NGCA, GCA Donetskiy Zhovanka GCA NGCA 1 house damaged 50 houses damaged 6 houses damaged 2 houses damaged 2 houses damaged In addition, the cumulative analytics for the first five months of the year was presented in the graph: 80 500 450 70 400 60 350 50 300 40 250 200 30 150 20 100 10 50 0 0 I II III IV V I II III IV I II III IV V I II III IV V I II III IV V January February March April May NGCA_DONETSKA_OBLAST GCA_DONETSKA_OBLAST NGCA_LUHANSKA_OBLAST GCA_LUHANSKA_OBLAST Cumulative Statistics for the period January - May 2018 450 houses were reported as damaged in the GCA NGCA first 5 months of 2018: 146 (32%) in GCA and Luhansk 304 (68%) in NGCA. Luhansk 59 21 40% 7% Flash-points in May: Novoazovskiy raion (near Mariupol), Zaitseve, Toretsk, north-western districts of Donetsk city and Dokuchaevsk GCA NGCA Donetsk Donetsk area. 87 283 60% 93% The last chart to be presented is the usual comparison of the first 5 months of 2018 with the correspondent period of the last year. 1380 1400 1200 1000 800 600 360 330 210 186 400 36 157 200 21 50 0 Jan Feb March Apr May 2017 2018 Important note: figures in this table include both GCA and NGCA damages. Since no verified statistics exist for NGCA damages in 2017, this table is based on the damages reported in 2017 in GCA and on a ratio GCA/NGCA roughly set at 1:2 on the basis of the 2018 trend. Focal points for winterization activities; workshop dedicated to recommendations for winter activities in 2018-2019 All partners, participated in winterization activities in 2017-2018, have agreed to assign focal points to share PDM findings and lessons learned. Winterization recommendations drafted during a dedicated workshop will be built on the PDM reports from the partner’s part. Goals and benefits from participating in the Shelter/NFI Cluster activities With the little change in the Shelter Cluster team, there was a necessity to remind old and new partners about goals of the Cluster and the ways that organizations can benefit from participating in it. The Shelter/NFI Cluster exists to make sure every single beneficiary eligible for humanitarian assistance gets means to live in a safe, dignified and appropriate shelter. Feedback from partners was requested to know if benefits are still relevant and accessible. Up-to-date information showing shelter needs, how these needs are being met, who meets them, as well as the remaining gaps. This includes maps, factsheets, distribution data etc. Technical expertise and lessons learnt . A place where shelter actors can agree on standards and decide on common strategies . Information about available funding, what it is for and how to access it . A platform for coordination to help avoid duplication and overlap of activities and to facilitate targeting of those most in need . Advice on how to connect the current shelter programmes to early recovery, contingency planning and risk reduction . A team that will advocate on behalf of the shelter sector. Interactive tools to improve participation and involvement The Shelter/NFI cluster team has suggested using interactive tools to improve participation and involvement of its partners besides conventional ways of communication. Groups on social communication platforms might in the future facilitate the exchange of information among stakeholders. Every participant can have an on-line access to any sort of updates produced by the Cluster and make his/her contribution as well. All pieces of information are welcomed so not to overlook critical details. Partner Updates NRC: currently working on two projects with NMFA and UNHCR. Funds available from NMFA cover the repair works on 4 core-houses (3 already ongoing) and 11 heavy scale repairs (but 13 houses have already been identified). Out of 25 core houses under UNHCR, 23 have been selected. Beneficiaries eligible for heavy repairs (30) have been selected too, and 210 out of 310 for light and medium have been selected too. To date, 17 HR agreements have been signed. ECHO project is underway – 150 L/M repairs, 100 windows and 40 house insulations. The team of three people is making assessment on backlog damages in two regions. ADRA: finalized winterization activities; plans for shelter – 1000 LR, 530 MR and 25 HR, 100 house insulations (40% in Luhansk oblast). To date 1000 application forms have been processed and works Started on 53 houses. UNHCR: did PDM on winterization cash (a sample equal to 10% out of 300 households); in Severodonetsk is working in partnership with NRC on shelter activities; is planning 6 interventions that include public infrastructure repairs; winterization activities undecided yet. OCHA: from the middle of the summer will start reviewing needs and drafting new Humanitarian response plan. Caritas: Basic needs project with MPC (860x4 UAH in four stages) to 400 beneficiaries in 2018, solid fuel (briquettes) to 400 households. Action Points Who Workshop dedicated to winterization activities All partners Agencies to share success stories or important information for Factsheet All partners Attendance List Organization Name Function Email Address Proliska Gritsenko Larisa Coordinator [email protected] ICRC Aliona Goncharova EcoSec Field Officer [email protected] ADRA Roman Makeenko M&E Officer [email protected] Caritas/ Zuiev Serhii Coordinator [email protected] Severodonetsk NRC Igor Kamenskyi PC Shelter [email protected] UNHCR Slava Savchuk Shelter Associate [email protected] Shelter Cluster/ Shelter Cluster Co-ord. / Andrea Parisi [email protected] UNHCR UNHCR Shelter Officer Subnational Shelter Shelter Cluster Victor Gladchenko [email protected] Cluster Co-Chair UN OCHA Iryna Petrovska Field Assistant [email protected] UN OCHA Oleksandr Ovdiienko HA [email protected] Anastasiia MinTOT/Luhansk Officer [email protected] Ovsiannikova .
Recommended publications
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH Only
    SEC.FR/876/20 29 December 2020 OSCE+ ENGLISH only THEMATIC REPORT CHECKPOINTS ALONG THE CONTACT LINE: CHALLENGES CIVILIANS FACE WHEN CROSSING 1 November 2019 - 15 November 2020 December 2020 1 Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2020 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 4 Introduction 7 Chapter 1: Legislative and regulatory developments 9 Measures taken at the entry-exit checkpoints (EECP) and at the corresponding checkpoints of the 9 armed formations amid the COVID-19 outbreak (16 March to 10 June 2020) Regulatory developments following the partial reopening of the EECPs and of the corresponding check- 10 points (10 June to 15 November 2020) Other developments 12 Chapter 2: Impact on civilians of the freedom of movement restrictions and of the crossing requirements 14 after the partial reopening of the EECPs and the corresponding checkpoints Impact of freedom of movement restrictions on access to rights and services 14 Partial reopening of the EECPs and corresponding checkpoints, and burden of crossing requirements 18 on civilians Chapter 3: Opening of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge and construction works near Zolote and Shchas- 22 tia Opening of the renovated section of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge 22 Construction and works near Shchastia and Zolote 22 Conclusion 26 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Crucial aspects of the lives of civilians in the conflict-affected areas of eastern Ukraine depend on their ability to cross the contact line.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid WASH and Infrastructure Assessment in Non-Government Controlled Areas of Eastern Ukraine
    ` A Rapid WASH and Infrastructure Assessment in Non-Government Controlled Areas of Eastern Ukraine August, 2015 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This assessment was commissioned by UNICEF, with data collected remotely by REACH in July 2015 from key informants at water, health, and education facilities as well as from affected communities. Thanks go to all those individuals and organisations who contributed towards this assessment, including the Global WASH Cluster who contributed to the final analysis and drafting. REACH is a joint initiative of IMPACT, its sister organisation ACTED, and the United Nations Operational Satellite Applications Programme (UNOSAT). REACH facilitates the development of information tools and products that enhance the capacity of aid actors to make evidence-based decisions. For more information, write to [email protected], visit www.reach-intiative.org and follow us @REACH_info. Cover photo: Delivery of drinking water to Debaltseve, Donetsk Oblast, March 2015, ©UNICEF i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Conflict has been ongoing in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts since May 2014, with spikes of violence in June 2014 and again in January-February and in July 2015. Attempts to negotiate a political solution to the conflict led to the ‘Minsk’ ceasefire signed between the Governments of Ukraine, Russian Federation and the non-state actors in September 2014. However, the truce collapsed within days, similar to a new ceasefire agreement signed in February 2015. Relative calm around the Contact Line (CL) has ensued since September 2015, however, the situation remains fragile given lack of trust between the parties to the conflict. From the end of 2014, Ukrainian legislation has restricted freedom of moment of both people and goods, in addition to the cessation of salary and pension payments in the non-governmental controlled areas (NGCAs), increasing hardship for local populations.
    [Show full text]
  • WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin
    WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin 01 November - 31 December 2017 Issue 12 WASH Cluster Coordinator OVERALL INCIDENTS ANALYSIS FOR 2017: TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS Mark Buttle [email protected] In 2017 the WASH Cluster recorded 1351 separate incidents in total, each of which put at risk the water supply or sanitation to 4.8 million people served by centralized systems in conflict-affected Eastern Ukraine, with almost WASH Cluster IMOs: 60% occurring in the first 6 months. Volodymyr Kalinin Donetsk oblast experienced 116 incidents: 14 in Government Controlled Areas (GCA) and 102 in Non-Government [email protected] Controlled Areas (NGCA). In Luhansk oblast there were only 19 incidents: 17 in GCA areas and only 2 in NGCA areas. This is not to say Luhansk was less affected: a single incident near Popasna, in April, cut water for around Stas Dymkovskyy 180,000 people for 27 consecutive days. The WASH Cluster notes that people were almost always affected on [email protected] both sides of the Line of the Contact for most incidents. In the overview, all months were different, however there were three main periods of increased activity, when there was heavy shelling around critical water infrastructure along the Line of Contact: February and March; May KEY FACTS to July; and December (see below). Ceasefires were effective only for relatively short-time periods. 135 is the total number of WASH Incidents and their effect, 2017 Of the 135 incidents, WASH incidents since the start 25 7,000,000 of 2017. water infrastructure was damaged or 6,000,000 Geographical breakdown of stopped due to explo- incidents by oblast and by gov- 20 sive risk 80 times; and ernment controlled versus non- 5,000,000 electricity cuts due to government controlled areas: shelling affected water 15 Donetsk Luhansk Total 4,000,000 supply another 46 times.
    [Show full text]
  • UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT February 2019
    UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT February 2019 Ukraine Humanitarian 2019 Situation Report No. 2 © UNICEF/2019/Fillipov UNICEF’s Response with Partners UNICEF 2019 Sector/Cluster 2019 2019 Funds Available UNICEF Cumulative Cluster Cumulative Funds Target results (#) Target results (#) received Nutrition 2,000 0 to date: 1,300,000 n/a Health1 24,800 663 $.6M 3% 2 WASH 1,125,500 361,269 2,000,000 371,365 Child 170,000 18,044 1,300,000 n/a Carry- Protection forward Funding Education 34,500 12,989 200,000 n/a amount: gap: $3.3M HIV & AIDS3 200 0 n/a n/a $17.2M 16% 81% Number of people in need: 3,000,0004 (2019 UNICEF HAC) Number of children in need of humanitarian assistance: 500,0005 (2019 UNICEF HAC) Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs On 31 January, the 2019 Ukraine Humanitarian Response Plan was launched in Kiev jointly with the Ministry of Temporary Occupied Territories (MTOT), requesting US$162 million to provide aid to 2.3 million people affected by the conflict. This includes UNICEF’s requirement of $21,067,799. During the month of February, two Member States briefings were organized – one in New York and the other one in Brussels. On the day of the Member States briefing in New York (12.02.2019), at the initiative of the Russian Government, the Security Council called for a meeting to discuss the humanitarian situation in eastern Ukraine. The Assistant Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Deputy Emergency Relief Coordinator, Ursula Mueller, briefed the Council on the humanitarian situation and its consequences on civilian population, with a special mention on the targeting of water infrastructure and water workers, as 1 UNICEF target additionally includes the estimated 80% immunization coverage of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella and polio vaccines.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 239/2020 7 October 20201 Summary
    - 1 - Daily Report 239/2020 7 October 20201 Summary The SMM recorded three ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and one in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded nine ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and five in Luhansk region. A woman and a boy were injured by the explosion of a device near Zolote- 5/Mykhailivka, Luhansk region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. During night hours, an SMM long-range unmanned aerial vehicle spotted a person inside the disengagement area near Zolote. The SMM saw four weapons in violation of withdrawal lines in a non-government- controlled area of Luhansk region. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localised ceasefires to enable repairs to and the operation of critical civilian infrastructure. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians amid the COVID-19 pandemic, including at an entry-exit checkpoint and the corresponding checkpoint of the armed formations in Luhansk region. The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted.* Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 6 October 2020. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational. 3 Including explosions 4 Including from unidentified weapons - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded three ceasefire violations – all undetermined explosions in areas north-north-west of Staropetrivske (non-government-controlled, 35km north-east of Donetsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine, 16 February to 15 May 2019, Para
    Contents I. Executive summary .............................................................................................................................................. 1 II. OHCHR methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .............................................................................................................................................. 6 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties .................................................................................................... 6 Civilian casualties ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Civilian casualties during the entire conflict period ...................................................................................... 7 Attacks on civilian objects ........................................................................................................................... 7 B. Impact of the conflict and COVID-19 on the population in the conflict zone..................................................... 8 Remedy and reparation for civilian victims of the conflict ............................................................................ 8 Freedom of movement in the context of COVID-19 ..................................................................................... 9 Right to social security .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 November 2017 to 15
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 November 2017 to 15 February 2018 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Executive summary ............................................................................................ 1–16 1 II. Rights to life, liberty, security and physical integrity ........................................... 17–41 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................... 17–24 3 B. Deprivation of liberty, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment, and conflict-related sexual violence ........................................................... 25–41 6 1. Access to places of detention ........................................................... 25–27 6 2. Deprivation of liberty, enforced dis-appearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment, and conflict related sexual violence ......................... 28–35 6 3. Situation of pre-conflict prisoners ................................................... 36–41 7 III. Accountability and administration of justice ........................................................ 42–55 9 A. Accountability for human rights violations and abuses committed in the east 42 9 B. Fair trial rights ............................................................................................ 43–48 9 C. High-profile cases of violence related to riots and public disturbances ......... 49–55 10 1. Accountability for the killings of protesters at Maidan ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Luhanska Oblast REFERENCE MAP for Humanitarian Purposes Only As of November 2017 Production Date: 20 November 2017
    UKRAINE - Luhanska oblast REFERENCE MAP For Humanitarian Purposes Only Production date: 20 November 2017 As of November 2017 Shevchenkove Hohyne Slyzneve Vilkhuvatka Petropavlivka Novooleksandrivka Prykolotne Kurhanne Dovhenke Hannopillia Malyi Kotivka Malakhove Harbuzivka Yurivka Burluk Milove Mykolaivka Fedorivka Khatnie Berezhne Pohorile Pidserednie Doroshenkove Shevchenkove Ambarne Novoselivka Vovchanskyi Mykhailivka Krasnoiarske Kyrylivka Horiane raion Siryi Buriakivka Velykoburlutskyi Zamist Sonino Seredivka Moskalivka Yar raion Odradne Velykyi Burluk Hryhorivka Bolohivka Didivka Hnylytsia Balka Syrotyne Yaiechne Obukhivka Stroivka Paskivka Hannivka Persha Ploske Zhukiv Demyno-Oleksandrivka Mykilske Novouzhvynivka Yar Dvorichanske Harashkivka Lebedivka Mantsivka Hnylytsia Holubivka Topoli Borshchova Katerynivka Kolodiazne Kupievakha Shatkivka Zelenyi Chervona Rodnychky Hai Khvylia Kamianka Pisky Bahachka Kanivtseve Rohozianka Arkushyne Vesele Novovasylivka Lyman Topoli Pishchanka Rozsypne Sadovod Druhyi Lantrativka Zelenyi Shypuvate Krasne Poltavske Artemivka Nova Andriivka Mytrofanivka Hai Nova Vodiane Pershe Dzherelne Maslivka Oleksandrivka Shypuvate Petrivka Pavlivka Babycheve Oleksandrivka Petro-Ivanivka Nezhdanivka Zaitseve Voievodske Pechenizkyi Ridkodub Mykolaivka Nesterivka Pryliutove Dvorichanskyi Troitske Maksymivka Zahiria raion Stetskivka Putnykove Shevchenkove Serednii Fyholivka raion Solontsi Berezivka Prosianka Krasne Burluk Mykolaivka Kasianivka Dovhenke Bohdanivske Maltsivka Polkovnyche Shyshkivka Novomlynsk Terny
    [Show full text]
  • UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT April 2019
    UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT April 2019 Ukraine Humanitarian 2019 Situation Report No. 4 © UNICEF/2019/Fillipov UNICEF’s Response with Partners 2019 Funds Available UNICEF 2019 Sector/Cluster 20191 UNICEF Cumulative Cluster Cumulative Funds received to date: Target results (#) Target results (#) $2.8M 13% Nutrition 2,000 0 1,300,000 n/a Health 24,800 1002 Carry-forward 2019 Funding WASH 1,125,500 746,265 2,000,000 n/a amount: Requirement $3.3M 16% $21.1M Funding gap: Child 170,000 34,391 1,300,000 n/a $15.0M 71% Protection Education 34,500 14,924 200,000 n/a HIV & AIDS 200 0 n/a n/a Number of people in need: 3,000,0002 (2019 UNICEF HAC). Number of children in need of humanitarian assistance: 500,0003 (2019UNICEF HAC). Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs The overall security situation in the Eastern Conflict Area (ECA) remains tense and unpredictable. The OSCE special monitoring mission continued to record daily ceasefire violations including artillery fire along the Line of Contact with damaging private households/infrastructure and wounding civilians. Moreover, the expected "Easter truce" to be agreed on 18th April 2019 was not reached. During the reporting period, two verified cases were reported by the education cluster on incidents affecting a school in non-government-controlled area. No injuries were reported. Seven different incidents were reported by the WASH cluster in the immediate vicinity of water facilities during the month of April 2019. On 15th April 2019, shelling in Dokuchaievsk damaged Voda Donbassa office and employees were forced to take cover in bomb shelters.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 122/2020 23 May 20201 Summary
    - 1 - Daily Report 122/2020 23 May 20201 Summary Compared with the previous reporting period, the Mission recorded more ceasefire violations in both Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Small-arms fire was assessed as directed at SMM mini-UAVs near Petrivske and Vesela Hora, where bullets also flew over SMM members. The SMM followed up on reports of a man injured due to shelling in Shyroka Balka on 9 April, Donetsk region. Members of the armed formations continued to deny the Mission passage at checkpoints along official crossing routes in Donetsk and Luhansk regions.* The SMM saw craters, assessed as recent, near residential houses in Staromykhailivka, Donetsk region. It continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. It recorded ceasefire violations inside the disengagement area near Petrivske and spotted during evening hours a person at a former position of the Ukrainian Armed Forces inside the disengagement area near Zolote. It saw mines, including some for the first time, near Maiorsk and Petrivske and in Zaitseve, Holmivskyi, and Staromykhailivka. The Mission continued following up on measures taken amid the COVID-19 outbreak, including at entry-exit checkpoints and their corresponding checkpoints in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The SMM’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted.* 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 22 May 2020. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. - 2 - Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions4 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational.
    [Show full text]