DOCSLIB.ORG

The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems Leonid Grinin, Anton Grinin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems Leonid Grinin, Anton Grinin The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems Leonid Grinin, Anton Grinin To cite this version: Leonid Grinin, Anton Grinin. The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self- Regulating Systems. 2016, 978-5-7057-4877-8. hprints-01794179 HAL Id: hprints-01794179 https://hal-hprints.archives-ouvertes.fr/hprints-01794179 Submitted on 7 Jun 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The International Center for Education and Social and Humanitarian Studies Volgograd Center for Social Research Leonid Grinin and Anton Grinin The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems Moscow 2016 ББК 30г 60.5 63 Leonid Grinin and Anton Grinin The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems. Moscow: Moscow branch of Uchitel Publishing House, 2016. – 216 pp. ISBN 978-5-7057-4877-8 The monograph presents the ideas about the main changes that occurred in the devel- opment of technologies from the emergence of Homo sapiens till present time and outlines the prospects of their development in the next 30–60 years and in some respect until the end of the twenty-first century. What determines the transition of a society from one level of development to another? One of the most fundamental causes is the global technological transformations. Among all major technological breakthroughs in history the most important are three production revolutions: 1) the Agrarian Revolution; 2) the Industrial Revolution; and 3) the Cybernet- ic one. The book introduces the theory of production revolutions which is a new valuable explanatory paradigm that analyzes causes and trends of dramatic shifts in historical pro- cess. The authors describe the course of technological transformations in history and demonstrate a possible application of the theory to explain the present and forthcoming technological changes. They analyze the technological shifts which took place in the sec- ond half of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries and forecast the main shifts in the next half a century. On this basis the authors present a detailed analysis of the latest pro- duction revolution which is denoted as ‘Сybernetic’. They make some predictions about its development in the nearest five decades and up to the end of the twenty-first century and show that the development of various self-regulating systems will be the main trend of this revolution. The authors argue that the transition to the starting final phase of the Cybernet- ic Revolution (in the 2030–2040s) will first occur in the field of medicine (in some its in- novative branches). In future we will deal with the started convergence of innovative tech- nologies which will form the system of MANBRIC-technologies (i.e. the technological paradigm based on medicine, additive, nano- and bio- technologies, robotics, IT and cogni- tive technologies). The monograph gives an outline of the future breakthroughs in medi- cine and some other technologies (between the 2010s and 2070s). This research has been supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Project № 14-11-00634). ISBN 978-5-7057-4877-8 © Uchitel Publishing House, 2016 Contents Introduction. Between Human and Post-Human Revolutions or What Future is Awaiting Us? . 5 Chapter 1. Global Technological Transformations: Theory and History . 15 Chapter 2. The Characteristics and the Logic of the Cybernetic Revolution. MANBRIC-Technologies . 41 Chapter 3. Medicine in the Cybernetic Revolution: Medicine and Medical Technologies as a Breakthrough to Control Over Human Body . 61 Chapter 4. Biotechnologies within the Cybernetic Revolution: Biotechnologies and Creation of Self-Regulating Systems 87 Chapter 5. Nanotechnologies as the Way to Mastering the Microworld 103 Chapter 6. Robotics and Other Technologies in the Cybernetic Revolution . 116 Afterword. Threats and Risks of the Future World of Self-Regulating Systems . 134 Appendix 1. Some Issues in the Theory of Historical Process . 146 Appendix 2. Mathematical Interpretation of Historical Process . 151 Appendix 3. The Sixth Kondratieff Wave and the Cybernetic Revolution . 163 References . 173 About the Authors . 215 4 Оглавление Introduction Between Human and Post-Human Revolutions or What Future is Awaiting Us? In the modern world an individual deals with different technologies and products of scientific and technological progress and becomes more and more dependent on them, spending considerable time to understand changes and to keep up with progress. In general, the entire human history especially in the last few centuries is the history of victories and triumph of science, tech- nology, and information technologies. Moreover, the humankind being a fa- ther of technology at the same time became more and more dependent on it. Today technologies penetrate almost every aspect of our life: private, fami- ly and intimate, as well as our mentality. But even more serious transfor- mations are awaiting us in the future when devices and technologies are in- troduced into the human body and consciousness thus putting strain on all our biological (nervous, physical, and intellectual) adaptive capacities. To- day they give a serious thought to seemingly strange ideas about whether mobile phones, computers, and organizers can become a part of our body and brain. In fact, technology has become one of the most powerful forces of development. The changes occurring within the society are very often caused by technological transformations. That is why the issues of technological de- velopment appeal to our contemporaries. So it is extremely important to re- veal some regularity in the history of technological development, and make an effort to anticipate at least the coming transformations in technologies and in the society. But, unfortunately, there are quite a few researches which in a systemic and consistent way describe the technological devel- opment and can explain in scientific terms why and how the technological revolutions occur. Besides, there are also quite a few works that present a consistent forecast of technological development proceeding from the dis- covered developmental trends. Our study is devoted to the history of development of engineering and technology, to the analysis of their current state and reflections about their fu- ture. In this book we pay attention to the main technological revolutions in 6 Introduction the history of human society, both to those already completed and to the fu- ture ones, as well as to the transformations in society and consciousness they have already brought and will cause in the future. In the 1950s and 1960s the world (first of all, the developed countries) witnessed the largest technological revolution which continues until the present. At the end of the twentieth century the achievements of this revolu- tion especially in the field of information technologies have become widely spread in the most countries of the world. This revolution is variously termed (scientific-technological, information, etc.). However, we denote this revolution as the Cybernetic Revolution since cybernetics is the science about information and its transformations in the process of regulating vari- ous complex systems. The current revolution has dramatically changed the information processing as well as promoted a breakthrough in the regula- tion of complex processes in a wide range of natural and artificial systems that have become a part of production process (and in the future it is likely to trigger such a breakthrough to the full scale by creating an essentially new environment, i.e. a world of self-regulating systems). The Cybernetic Revolution is the third largest production revolution in the history of humankind following the Agrarian (Neolithic) and Industrial ones; yet, it has not finished yet. In this volume we discuss the revolution- ary changes which the world will face in the coming six–seven decades within the ongoing Cybernetic Revolution. The coming phase of the Cyber- netic Revolution will change the quality of our life by enhancing the impact on human body. There will also appear technologies that will allow differ- ent systems to function in a necessary regime without direct human inter- vention (i.e. these systems will become autonomous and self-regulated). The capability to maintain the given parameters in self-supporting (auton- omous, self-regulated) regime will involve the control of production and in- formation that has already become possible in various spheres during the decades of the Cybernetic Revolution, as well as control of a number of technological, social, natural, and especially biological processes (as well as in the human body). Earlier they used to connect the emergence of Homo sapiens with new technologies (arguing that labour transformed apes into humans, while the labour implied first of all the ‘production’ of stone tools). Now it is clear that it was the result of a range of reasons which changed human genetics, though the material factors (such as the way of life and natural environment) also enormously contributed to this process. The transition to Homo sapiens is termed the Human revolution (e.g., Mellars and Stringer 1989), yet we would better denote it as Proto-production revolution with account of its im- Between Human and Post-Human Revolutions 7 pact on the society since it triggered quite a rapid development of technology proper (what is more, technology developed in different spheres including also the primitive painting). Today we are at the threshold of the Post-human revolution. Perhaps, it will be less dramatic than the transhumanists and other adherents of practi- cal immortality imagine it in a wish to part with the biological body.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State and Socio-Political Crises in the Process of Modernization
    State and Socio-Political Crises in the Process of Modernization Leonid Grinin Eurasian Center for Big History and System Forecasting ABSTRACT This article starts with a brief analysis of the causes of state col- lapse as states undergo the process of political evolution. Next, I describe and analyze the mechanisms of social-political crises arising in the process of modernization. Such crises are a conse- quence of the inability of many traditional institutions and ideolo- gies to keep up with changes in technology, communication, system of education, medical sphere, and with the demographic change. This analysis suggests that an accelerated development can cause a system crisis with potentially serious consequences to the society. It is important to take this aspect into consideration because some scholars insist that the economic reconstruction and development are necessary for nation-building. This actually implies a rapid economic advancement (otherwise, the economy could not be re- constructed and developed). However, one should not ignore the possibility that very rapidly developing countries may run the dan- ger of falling into the trap of fast transformation. The present arti- cle describes several mechanisms that can contribute to sociopoli- tical instability, including social tensions arising from rapid ur- banization, youth bulges, and ‘resource curses’. INTRODUCTION I define the state as a system of specialized institutions and rules that regulate internal and external political life of a society. This system is a power-,
    [Show full text]
  • Louise Mackie '61 to Receive This Year's Wca Award
    WellsNotes Spring 2021 Wells College Alumnae and Alumni Newsletter Wells College Association of Alumnae and Alumni LOUISE MACKIE ’61 TO RECEIVE THIS YEAR’S WCA AWARD The Wells College Association of Alumnae and Alumni will present the 2021 WCA Award to Louise W. Mackie ’61, for her exceptional contributions to the field of historic textiles from Islamic lands. Louise Mackie received her bachelor of arts in art history from Wells College and with Carol Gaines Ruckle ’61 after graduation enjoyed visiting her Wells professor, Hannelore Glasser, in Florence, Italy, during two enlightening years of traveling, studying and working in Europe and the Middle East. That led to secretarial work in the Islamic Art Department at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York which inspired studying Islamic art history with Professor Richard Ettinghausen for a master of arts at NYU’s Institute of Fine Arts, integrated with stimulating graduate studies at the American University in Cairo, Egypt. She recently retired as curator of textiles and Islamic art at the Cleveland Museum of Art in Cleveland, Ohio. During her impressive curatorial career of 45 years, Mackie held positions at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, The Textile Museum in Washington, D.C., and taught at the University of Toronto. She was a founding director (in 1987) and past president of the Textile Society of America, which is thriving with over 800 WCA AWA R D members; sat on the Advisory Committee of The Textile Museum; and served on the Conseil de Direction of the Centre International d’Etude des Textiles Anciens (CIETA) CEREMONY INVITATION in Lyon, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Forthcoming Kondratieff Wave, Cybernetic Revolution, and Global Ageing Grinin, Leonid; Grinin, Anton; Korotayev, Andrey
    www.ssoar.info Forthcoming Kondratieff wave, Cybernetic Revolution, and global ageing Grinin, Leonid; Grinin, Anton; Korotayev, Andrey Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Grinin, L., Grinin, A., & Korotayev, A. (2017). Forthcoming Kondratieff wave, Cybernetic Revolution, and global ageing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 52-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.017 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Erik Trinkaus
    9/2014 Curriculum Vitae Erik Trinkaus Education and Degrees 1970-1975 University of Pennsylvania Ph.D 1975 Dissertation: A Functional Analysis of the Neandertal Foot M.A. 1973 Thesis: A Review of the Reconstructions and Evolutionary Significance of the Fontéchevade Fossils 1966-1970 University of Wisconsin B.A. 1970 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Primary Academic Appointments Current 2002- Mary Tileston Hemenway Professor of Arts & Sciences, Department of Anthropolo- gy, Washington University Previous 1997-2002 Professor: Department of Anthropology, Washington University 1996-1997 Regents’ Professor of Anthropology, University of New Mexico 1983-1996 Assistant Professor to Professor: Dept. of Anthropology, University of New Mexico 1975-1983 Assistant to Associate Professor: Department of Anthropology, Harvard University MEMBERSHIPS Honorary 2001- Academy of Science of Saint Louis 1996- National Academy of Sciences USA Professional 1992- Paleoanthropological Society 1990- Anthropological Society of Nippon 1985- Société d’Anthropologie de Paris 1973- American Association of Physical Anthropologists AWARDS 2013 Faculty Mentor Award, Graduate School, Washington University 2011 Arthur Holly Compton Award for Faculty Achievement, Washington University 2005 Faculty Mentor Award, Graduate School, Washington University PUBLICATIONS: Books Trinkaus, E., Shipman, P. (1993) The Neandertals: Changing the Image of Mankind. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Pub. pp. 454. PUBLICATIONS: Monographs Trinkaus, E., Buzhilova, A.P., Mednikova, M.B., Dobrovolskaya, M.V. (2014) The People of Sunghir: Burials, Bodies and Behavior in the Earlier Upper Paleolithic. New York: Ox- ford University Press. pp. 339. Trinkaus, E., Constantin, S., Zilhão, J. (Eds.) (2013) Life and Death at the Peştera cu Oase. A Setting for Modern Human Emergence in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenomenological Perspectives on Technological Posthumanism
    Master thesis Phenomenological perspectives on technological posthumanism Supervisors: prof. dr. Paul Ziche, dr. Iris van der Tuin Date: 10. 8. 2017 Name: Tomáš Čech Student number: 5656664 Number of Words: 24 678 i Content 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Posthumanism/transhumanism – how to make sense of it all ......................................................... 4 2.1. What is transhumanism and transhuman? ............................................................................... 7 2.2. Transhumanist perception of technology and science ........................................................... 11 2.3. Comparison between transhumanism and religion ................................................................ 13 2.4. In Summary ........................................................................................................................... 15 3. Debate about transhumanism ........................................................................................................ 15 3.1. Transhumanism as an ideology ............................................................................................. 17 3.2. Reaction to transhumanism - bioconservatism ...................................................................... 21 3.3. Bioconservative arguments – why transhumanism is not such a great idea .......................... 26 3.4. Human dignity and the transhumanism debate.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia University Journal of Bioethics 1 2 Fall 2008
    Columbia University Journal of Bioethics 1 2 Fall 2008 Columbia University Journal of Bioethics And Supplement on BIOCEP Volume VI. No 1, Fall 2008 Editorial Board Faculty Editors Editors-in-Chief Dr. John D. Loike Dr. Ruth L. Fischbach Copy Editors Soo Han Cover Design: “Entwine‖ Komal Kaothari Robyn Scheinder and Dr. John D. Loike Please send your comments to Dr. John D. Loike at: [email protected] Production & Creative Directors Robyn Scheinder Jana Bassman Web Version is available through the undergraduate page: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/ Or through http://www.bioethicscolumbia.org/ Copyright 2008 by: Columbia University Center for Bioethics NO PART OF THIS JOURNAL MAY BE COPIED OR USED WITHOUT PERMISSION. All views in the articles reflect those of the authors only. Columbia University Journal of Bioethics 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 5 Introductions by Dr. John Loike and Dr. Ruth Fischbach ............ …………………………………..…….6-7 Section I: Genetics The Sound and the Fury By Katie O‘Neill and Wei-Jen Hsieh……………………………………………….. Majority Report: DNA Data-banking As an Opt-Out System By Emilia Javorsky and Robyn Schneider………………………………………... Could Genetic Research Interfere with Medicine? By Jorge Jara and Joanna Etra………………………………………………. Charging You for Being You By Elisa Fung and Gabriela Vargas…………………………………………. Section II: Stem Cells and Reproductive Medicine Altered Nuclear Transfer: A Novel Way of Developing Pluripotent Stem Cells By Sarah Eberle and Tabby Khan………………………………………………... Secrets and Lies: Mandating Disclosure in Oocyte Donation By Tiffany Hsieh………………………………………………………………….. Diagnosing Disability… And Keeping It by David Yin and John Tseng……………………………………………….. Section III: Neuroethics Programmed Free Will By Elisa Fung and Lindsay Kugler………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Volume III - Article 2 Legislating Limits on Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Sïna A. Muscati1 Spring 2003 Copyright © 2003 University of Pittsburgh School of Law Journal of Technology Law and Policy Introduction Research on embryonic stem cells has generated great intrigue in the scientific community. Many medical researchers consider stem cell-based therapies to have the potential of treating a host of human ailments and yielding a number of medical benefits. They are motivated by the possibility of treating incurable diseases or facilitating effective treatment methods. Their enthusiasm is shared by many of those who are afflicted with these debilitating diseases. However, the methodology of this research raises numerous ethical and public policy concerns. The extraction of embryonic stem cells for research destroys the human embryo. This has generated a storm of debate about if, and in what circumstances, this research can be legally and ethically justified. The concerns are heightened further when embryos are created specifically for use in the very research that occasions their destruction. In response, numerous countries have passed legislation that attempts to control some of the more controversial aspects of embryonic stem cell research. For example, in May 2002, Canada introduced draft legislation that would govern and restrict a number of practices related to this fast-growing field of research. 1 L.L.B., third year, University of Ottawa; B.Sc. (Hons.) 2001, Carleton University. The author gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Centre of Innovation Law and Policy of the University of Toronto. The author also wishes to thank Professor Ian R. Kerr of the University of Ottawa for his guidance throughout the writing of this Article.
    [Show full text]
  • Could Artificial Wombs End the Abortion Debate?
    Philosophy Faculty Works Philosophy Summer 2005 Could Artificial ombsW End the Abortion Debate? Christopher Kaczor Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Christopher Kaczor, “Could Artificial ombsW End the Abortion Debate?” National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5.2 (Summer 2005): 73-91. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Could Artificial Wombs End the Abortion Debate? Christopher Kaczor Although artificial wombs may seem fanciful when first considered, certain trends suggest they may become reality. Between 1945 and the 1970s, the weight at which premature infants could survive dropped dramatically, moving from 1000 grams to around 400 grams.1 In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court, in deciding Roe v. Wade, considered viability to begin around twenty-eight weeks. In 2000, premature babies were reported to have survived at eighteen weeks.2 Advanced incubators already in existence save thousands of children born prematurely each year. It is highly likely that such incubators will become even more advanced as technology progresses. Researchers are working to make super-advanced incubators, “artificial wombs,” a reality. Temple University professor Dr. Thomas Schaffer hopes to save premature infants using a synthetic amniotic fluid of oxygen-rich perfluorocarbons. Lack of funding has thus far prevented tests on human infants born prematurely, but Shaffer has successfully transferred premature lamb fetuses from their mother’s wombs and used the synthetic amniotic fluid to sustain their lives.3 At Cornell University, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems Grinin, Leonid; Grinin, Anton
    www.ssoar.info The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems Grinin, Leonid; Grinin, Anton Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Monographie / monograph Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Grinin, L., & Grinin, A. (2016). The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems. Moscow: Uchitel Publishing House. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57569-8 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Basic Digital Peer Publishing-Lizenz This document is made available under a Basic Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ The International Center for Education and Social and Humanitarian Studies Volgograd Center for Social Research Leonid Grinin and Anton Grinin The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems Moscow 2016 ББК 30г 60.5 63 Leonid Grinin and Anton Grinin The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems. Moscow: Moscow branch of Uchitel Publishing House, 2016. – 216 pp. ISBN 978-5-7057-4877-8 The monograph presents the ideas about the main changes that occurred in the devel- opment of technologies from the emergence of Homo sapiens till present time and outlines the prospects of their development in the next 30–60 years and in some respect until the end of the twenty-first century. What determines the transition of a society from one level of development to another? One of the most fundamental causes is the global technological transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: from Big Bang to Galactic Civilizations
    www.ssoar.info Introduction: From Big Bang to Galactic Civilizations - An Introduction to Big History Grinin, Leonid; Rodrigue, Barry; Korotayev, Andrey Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Sammelwerksbeitrag / collection article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Grinin, L., Rodrigue, B., & Korotayev, A. (2015). Introduction: From Big Bang to Galactic Civilizations - An Introduction to Big History. In From Big Bang to Galactic Civilizations: A Big History Anthology (pp. 1-16). Primus Books. https:// nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57736-1 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Basic Digital Peer Publishing-Lizenz This document is made available under a Basic Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Introduction n From Big Bang to Galactic Civilizations An Introduction to Big History BARRY RODRIGUE, LEONID GRININ and ANDREY KOROTAYEV n ACH SCIENTIFIC STUDY emerges in its own particular time and marks a new step in the development of human thought.1 Big E History materialized to satisfy the human need for a unified vision of our existence. It came together in the waning decades of the twentieth century, in part, as a reaction to the specialization of scholarship and education that had taken hold around the world. While this specialization had great results, it created barriers that stood in contrast to a growing unity among our global communities. These barriers were increasingly awkward to bridge, and, thus, Big History emerged as a successful new framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Big History's Big Potential
    Introduction Big History’s Big Potential Leonid E. Grinin, David Baker, Esther Quaedackers, and Andrey V. Korotayev Big History has been developing very fast indeed. We are currently ob- serving a ‘Cambrian explosion’ in terms of its popularity and diffusion. Big History courses are taught in the schools and universities of several dozen countries, including China, Korea, the Netherlands, the USA, In- dia, Russia, Japan, Australia, Great Britain, Germany, and many more. The International Big History Association (IBHA) is gaining momentum in its projects and membership. Conferences are beginning to be held regularly (this edited volume has been prepared on the basis of the pro- ceedings of the International Big History Association Inaugural Confer- ence [see below for details]). Hundreds of researchers are involved in studying and teaching Big History. What is Big History? And why is it becoming so popular? Accord- ing to the working definition of the IBHA, ‘Big History seeks to under- stand the integrated history of the Cosmos, Earth, Life and Humanity, using the best available empirical evidence and scholarly methods’. The need to see this process of development holistically, in its origins and growing complexity, is fundamental to what drives not only science but also the human imagination. This shared vision of the grand narrative is one of the most effective ways to conceptualize and integrate our growing knowledge of the Universe, society, and human thought. Moreover, without using ‘mega-paradigms’ like Big History, scientists working in different fields may run the risk of losing sight of how each other's tireless work connects and contributes to their own.
    [Show full text]
  • SKELLEFTEÅ Med NORSJÖ Kapell Och YTTERSTFORS Bruksförsamling
    SKELLEFTEÅ med NORSJÖ kapell och YTTERSTFORS bruksförsamling. (Västerbotten.) Sockennamnet framträder första gången i en handling från 1327 (DS 4, n. 2606), hvilken berör den kort förut igångsatta kolonisationen af det norrbottniska kust- landet mellan Skeldepth och Ulu. Att Skellefteå satts som ena gränspunkten för det område, som af regeringen fritt uppläts åt nybyggare, tyder på, att orten vid denna tid utgjorde den nordligaste platsen för en fast och mer samlad bebyggelse på svenska sidan af Bottenviken. Då samfundsbildningen här uppe i regel torde gått hand i hand med införandet af kyrklig organisation, är det icke osannolikt, att Skellefteå kanske redan på 1320-talet fått öfvertaga rollen att vara ärkestiftets nord- ligaste pastorat, hvilken år 1314 innehades af Bygdeå, att döma af det då upprättade uppbördsregistret öfver den s. k. Sexårsgärden (DS 4, n. 1946). Det tillägg, som gjorts till denna längd Skellopt cum capella Løfangr 1 mark 1 sol., förskrifver sig sanno- likt från medlet af 1300-talet och röjer ett tidigt inträdande behof af annexbild- ning. Löfånger afgick redan i början af 1400-talet såsom egen församling (se inledning till Löfånger), ehuru visserligen dess rökantal 20 var obetydligt i förhållande till Skeletta, som vid samma tid räknade 60.¹ Båda socknarna ingingo i den norr- ländska förläning, hvilken ärkebiskop Jacob Ulfsson den 20 aug. 1482 mottog af riksstyrelsen. Nästa utbrytning inträffade 1606, då Burträsk afskiljdes från Skellefteå område jämte något tillskott af byar från Löfånger och Bygdeå socknar. (Se inledn. till Burträsk.) Sedan dröjde det till långt fram på 1800-talet, innan nya afsöndringar kommo till stånd. Väl hade ärkebiskop Laurentius Paulinus Gothus år 1642 med- delat tillåtelse att anlägga ett kapell vid Åby i nuvarande Byske socken, men detta kapell ledde ej till någon fortsatt församlingsbildning.
    [Show full text]