Canarc Resource Corp. NI 43-101 Technical Report for the El Compas Project, Zacatecas State, Mexico

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Canarc Resource Corp. NI 43-101 Technical Report for the El Compas Project, Zacatecas State, Mexico Canarc Resource Corp. NI 43-101 Technical Report for the El Compas Project, Zacatecas State, Mexico Effective Date: January 19th, 2016 Report Date: February 4th, 2016 1 Canarc Resource Corp. NI 43-101 Technical Report for the El Compas Project Zacatecas State, Mexico February 2016 Prepared for: Canarc Resource Corp. #301-700 West Pender Street Vancouver, BC V6C 1G8 Prepared By: John Michael Collins, P.Geo. Neil Schunke, P.Eng. Sean Butler, P.Geo. Lisa Bascombe, MAIG Frank Wright, P.Eng. Effective Date: January 19th, 2016 Report Date: February 4th, 2016 2 Document Control Information Canarc Resource Corp. REVISION NI 43-101 Technical Report for the El Compas Project, Zacatecas State, Mexico No. DATE February 2016 0 02/04/2016 Revision Tracking Revision: Prepared By: Reviewed By: Issued For: Approved By: Date: Signature: S Butler, M Collins, F 0 Wright, L J Bothwell FV N Schunke 02/04/2016 Bascombe, N Schunke Issued for: Review and Comment (RC), Information Only (IO), Implementation (IM), Final Version (FV). Cover photo is a view of the La Plata processing facility 3 CERTIFICATES CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR I, John Michael William Collins, P.Geo., do hereby certify that: 1. I am currently employed as Manager North America by Mining Plus Canada Consulting Ltd., 440 - 580 Hornby St., Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2. This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Canarc Resource Corp., NI 43-101 Technical Report for the El Compas Project, Zacatecas State, Mexico” with effective date January 19th, 2016 (the “Technical Report”). 3. I am a graduate of the University of Dalhousie and received a Bachelor of Science degree with Honours in Earth Sciences in 1996. 4. I am a Registered Professional Geologist in the provinces of Ontario (No. 0828) and British Columbia, Canada (No. 38766). 5. I have worked in exploration geology and project management for 15 years. I have worked as a consulting geologist for companies for 11 years and for Mining Plus Canada Consulting Ltd. for 3 years. 6. I visited the El Compas Property on October 19th, 2015. 7. I am responsible for Sections 2-12, 18, 20 and parts of Sections 1 and 25-27 related to exploration and mineral resources of the Technical Report. 8. I am independent of Canarc Resource Corp. applying all of the tests in section 1.5 of NI 43- 101. 9. I have no prior involvement with the property that is the subject of this Technical Report. 10. I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form. 11. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information required to be disclosed to make the report not misleading. 12. I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101. 13. I consent to the filing of the Technical Report with any stock exchange and other regulatory authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes, including electronic publication in the public company files on their websites accessible by the public, of the Technical Report. Dated February 4th, 2016. “Signed and Sealed” John Michael William Collins P.Geo. 4 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR I, Neil Schunke, MAusIMM (CP Mining), P.Eng., do hereby certify that: 1. I am currently employed as a Principal Mining Consultant by Mining Plus Canada Consulting Ltd., Suite 440 - 580 Hornby Street, Vancouver BC V6C 3B6. 2. This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Canarc Resource Corp., NI 43-101 Technical Report for the El Compas Project, Zacatecas State, Mexico” with effective date January 19th, 2016 (the “Technical Report”). 3. I graduated in 2000 from the University of South Australia with a Bachelor of Engineering (Mining) degree and a Bachelor of Science (Applied Geology) degree. 4. I am a member in good standing of the AusIMM (Member No. 113025) holding accreditation as Chartered Professional (Mining) and the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia, Canada, Professional Engineer (No. 42320). 5. I have practiced in my profession for 15 years in the areas of underground production mining and consulting. 6. I visited the El Compas Property on October 19, 2015. 7. I am responsible for Sections, 15-16, 18-19, 21-22 and parts of Sections 1 and 25-26 related to mining engineering, infrastructure and economics of the Technical Report. 8. I am independent of Canarc Resource Corp. applying all of the tests in section 1.5 of NI 43-101. 9. I have no prior involvement with the property that is the subject of this Technical Report. 10. I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form. 11. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge and information the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information required to be disclosed to make the report not misleading. 12. I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43- 101”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfil the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101. 13. I consent to the filing of the Technical Report with any stock exchange and other regulatory authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes, including electronic publication in the public company files on their websites accessible by the public, of the Technical Report. Dated February 4th, 2016 “Signed and Sealed” Neil Schunke, MAusIMM, P.Eng. 5 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR I Sean P. Butler, P.Geo., do hereby certify that: 1. I am currently employed as a Senior Geology Consultant by Mining Plus Canada Consulting Ltd., Suite 440 - 580 Hornby St., Vancouver, BC, V6C 3B6. 2. This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Canarc Resource Corp., NI 43-101 Technical Report for the El Compas Project, Zacatecas State, Mexico” with effective date January 19th, 2016 (the “Technical Report”). 3. I am a graduate with a Bachelor of Science, in Geology from the University of British Columbia in 1982. 4. My professional affiliation is member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia, Canada, Professional Geoscientist (No. 19,233). 5. I have been professionally active in the mining industry for approximately 25 years since graduation from university. I have worked extensively exploring for both base and precious metals from early stage programs up to advanced underground exploration and mining. 6. I have not visited the El Compas property. 7. I am responsible for Sections 2-12, 15, 20, 23-24 and parts of Sections 26-27 related to geology of the Technical Report. 8. I am independent of Canarc Resource Corp. applying all of the tests in section 1.5 of NI 43-101. 9. I have no prior involvement with the property that is the subject of this Technical Report. 10. I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101-F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form. 11. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of the my knowledge, information and belief, this Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading. 12. I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National lnstrument 43-101 and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of Nl 43-101. 13. I consent to the filing of the Technical Report with any stock exchange and other regulatory authority and any publication by them for regulatory purposes, including electronic publication in the public company files on their websites accessible by the public, of the Technical Report. Dated February 4th, 2016. “Signed and Sealed” Sean P. Butler, P.Geo. 6 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR I, Lisa Bascombe of Perth Western Australia, Australia do hereby certify: 1. That I am a Principal Geologist with Mining Plus with a business address, Bravo building, 1 George Wiencke Drive, Perth, Western Australia. 2. This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled “Canarc Resource Corp., NI 43-101 Technical Report for the El Compas Project, Zacatecas State, Mexico” with effective date January 19th, 2016 (the “Technical Report”). 3. That I am a member in good standing of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG), membership number 3520. 4. That I am a graduate of Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia, graduating with BSc Geology in 1996. 5. That I have worked as an Exploration Geologist, Underground Mine Geologist, Senior Mine Geologist, Resource Geologist, Senior Consultant and Principal Consultant for a total of 19 years. 6. I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43- 101 (“NI 43- 101”) and certify that I am a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43- 101. 7. That I, Lisa Bascombe have not visited the El Compas Project of Canarc Resource Corp. 8. I am responsible for section 1.7 of the Executive Summary and Section 14.
Recommended publications
  • A Long Hole Stoping System for Mining Narrow Platinum Reefs
    A long hole stoping system for mining narrow platinum reefs by P. van Dorssen*, P. Valicek*, M. Farren*, G. Harrison*, W. Joubert*, R.G.B. Pickering†, and H.J. van Rensburg‡ Introduction ➤ Services requirement ➤ Ore removal and cleaning requirement In South African metalliferous mines, stoping operations are ➤ Training requirement largely confined to narrow, tabular orebodies making mechanization extremely difficult. Limited flexibility in terms of stope width has necessitated drilling by means of hand Safety targets held, pneumatic rock drills at most of our operations. As the All persons involved with the project had to adhere to the largest producer of platinum in the world, we drill in excess mine’s safety programmes including the zero-tolerance of forty million stope blast holes per annum. Cleaning of the campaign, and were required to report all hazards observed broken ore is also done by conventional means—utilizing immediately. Mine personnel and Tamrock carried out a full scrapers and scraper winches. Conventional methods such as risk assessment on the drill rig before transporting these carry high costs in terms of risk exposure as well as underground. A further risk assessment was carried out labour intensity. when the machine was in position underground. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of a long hole stoping system suitable for the narrow platinum reefs. The new system had to be substantially safer Mining layout and more cost effective than conventional mining. We selected a site that was conducive to mechanized mining and See Figure 1 and Figure 2 for a detailed description. set out the parameters that we considered would meet our requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Mines of El Dorado County
    by Doug Noble © 2002 Definitions Of Mining Terms:.........................................3 Burt Valley Mine............................................................13 Adams Gulch Mine........................................................4 Butler Pit........................................................................13 Agara Mine ...................................................................4 Calaveras Mine.............................................................13 Alabaster Cave Mine ....................................................4 Caledonia Mine..............................................................13 Alderson Mine...............................................................4 California-Bangor Slate Company Mine ........................13 Alhambra Mine..............................................................4 California Consolidated (Ibid, Tapioca) Mine.................13 Allen Dredge.................................................................5 California Jack Mine......................................................13 Alveoro Mine.................................................................5 California Slate Quarry .................................................14 Amelia Mine...................................................................5 Camelback (Voss) Mine................................................14 Argonaut Mine ..............................................................5 Carrie Hale Mine............................................................14 Badger Hill Mine
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Underground Mining Business
    IR-DAY2018 1 Komatsu IR-DAY 2018 Overview of Underground mining business September 14th, 2018 Masayuki Moriyama Senior Executive Officer President, Mining Business Division Chairman, Komatsu Mining Corp. IR-DAY2018 Various Mineral Resources 2 • Mineral resources are generated through several geologic effects. • Coal is usually categorized as Soft Rock, while other minerals such as Ferrous and Non-Ferrous are called as Hard Rock. # Generation of deposits Major Mineral Resources Platinum, Chromium, Magmatic deposit Titanium, Magnetite Generated Hard Igneous ① from Rock rock Magma Gold, Copper, Silver, Lead, Zinc, Hydrothermal Tin, Tungsten, deposit Molybdenum, Uranium Sedimentation/Weathering/ Erosion Sedime Hematite, Nickel, ② ntary Boxite, Lithium, etc rock Geothermal effect/Crustal rising Soft Rock *1 ③ Coal - ※1 Coal is not defined as “rock” in geological respect. Generation process of IR-DAY2018 Mineral Resources (1/2) 3 • Minerals derived from magma were generated in the depths of underground. 1) In case deposits exist beneath and relatively near from ground level, Open Pit Mining/Strip Mining methods are adopted. 2) In case deposits exist in the depths below geological formations, Underground Mining methods are adopted. 3) Open pit mines might shift to underground methods as they get deeper. 1.Magmatic deposit 2.Hydrothermal deposit 1) Typical minerals: 1) Typical minerals: Platinum, Chromium, Titanium, Gold, Copper, Silver, Lead, Zinc, Tin, Magnetite, etc. Tungsten, Molybdenum, Uranium, etc. 2) Generation process 2) Generation process ・In case Magma is slowly cooled, ・Hydrothermal mineral solution melted metal sulfide (containing Platinum, (containing metal elements) had been Chromium, Titanium or others) had been pushed up by high vapor pressure, separated and concentrated by specific precipitated and filled chasms in and gravity and generated deposit.
    [Show full text]
  • SIMPLIFIED COST MODELS for UNDERGROUND MINE EVALUATION a Handbook for Quick Prefeasibility Cost Estimates
    Montana Tech Library Digital Commons @ Montana Tech Mining Engineering Faculty Scholarship 2020 Simplified Cost Models orF Underground Mine Evaluation: A Handbook for Quick Prefeasibility Cost Estimates Thomas W. Camm Scott A. Stebbins Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtech.edu/mine_engr Part of the Mining Engineering Commons SIMPLIFIED COST MODELS FOR UNDERGROUND MINE EVALUATION A Handbook for Quick Prefeasibility Cost Estimates By Thomas W. Camm & Scott A. Stebbins 2020 Montana Technological University Mining Engineering Department MINING ENGINEERING CAMM & STEBBINS • SIMPLIFIED COST MODELS FOR UNDERGROUND MINE EVALUATION Simplified Cost Models For Underground Mine Evaluation A Handbook for Quick Prefeasibility Cost Estimates By Thomas W. Camm & Scott A. Stebbins Cover design by Lisa Sullivan Keywords: cost models, prefeasibility studies, underground mine design, mineral property evaluation, mine cost estimating Topic Area(s): Mineral property evaluation, underground mine design Copyright © 2020 by Thomas W. Camm & Scott A. Stebbins Mining Engineering Department Montana Technological University Butte, MT About us Montana Tech is ranked #1 among the best engineering schools in the nation by Best Value Schools (2020). You’ll have the opportunity to engage in hands-on learning with a 10:1 faculty to student ratio. Our ABET-accredited mining engineering degree program also boasts a 100% career outcome rate. Visit our website: https://www.mtech.edu/mining-engineering/index.html We hope you find this publication useful. We are strong believers in open-access teaching resources, and strive to keep the costs to our students as low as possible. For that reason, this publication is free, along with many other publications by myself and my colleagues in the Mining Engineering Department on our library Digital Commons page: https://digitalcommons.mtech.edu/mine_engr/ Suggested citation: Camm, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Potential in Critical Metals in the Fine Tailings Dams of the Panasqueira Mine (Barroca Grande, Portugal)
    UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA FACULTY OF SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY Department of Earth Sciences EVALUATION OF THE POTENTIAL IN CRITICAL METALS IN THE FINE TAILINGS DAMS OF THE PANASQUEIRA MINE (BARROCA GRANDE, PORTUGAL) - TUNGSTEN AND OTHER CRMs CASES - Francisco Cunha Soares Veiga Simão MASTER IN GEOSCIENCES – Specialisation in Geological Resources September, 2017 UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA FACULTY OF SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY Department of Earth Sciences EVALUATION OF THE POTENTIAL IN CRITICAL METALS IN THE FINE TAILINGS DAMS OF THE PANASQUEIRA MINE (BARROCA GRANDE, PORTUGAL) - TUNGSTEN AND OTHER CRMs CASES - Francisco Cunha Soares Veiga Simão MASTER IN GEOSCIENCES Specialisation in Geological Resources Scientific Advisors: Doctor Alcides Pereira, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra Doctor Elsa Gomes, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra September, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I RESUMO III ABSTRACT V LIST OF FIGURES VII LIST OF CHARTS IX LIST OF TABLES XI LIST OF ACRONYMS XIII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS, CHEMICAL SYMBOLS AND FORMULAS, AND UNITS XVII CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. RATIONALE 1 1.2. MAIN AND SPECIFIC GOALS 2 1.3. STATE OF THE ART 2 CHAPTER 2. EUROPEAN UNION AND PORTUGUESE POLICIES ON RAW MATERIALS 5 2.1. RAW MATERIALS INITIATIVE 6 2.2. INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMACY ON RAW MATERIALS 18 2.3. RAW MATERIALS INITIATIVE DEVELOPMENT 18 2.3.1. THE EUROPEAN INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP ON RAW MATERIALS 19 2.3.2. EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY 22 2.4. CIRCULAR ECONOMY 22 2.4.1. CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES 22 2.4.2. EUROPEAN UNION POLICIES ON CIRCULAR ECONOMY 24 2.4.3. CRITICAL RAW MATERIALS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION’S CIRCULAR ECONOMY 26 2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Longhole Stoping at the Asikoy Underground Copper Mine in Turkey
    4 Longhole Stoping at the Asikoy Underground Copper Mine in Turkey Alper Gönen Mining Engineering Department, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey 1. Introduction Asikoy underground copper mine is located in Küre county, some 60 km north of Kastamonu province and 25 km from Black Sea cost. Underground mining method is longhole stoping with post backfill. Ore production is 420.000 ton/year with an average of %2 copper grade[1]. 2. Geology of the region Küre copper deposits occur along the middle pontide zone. Although it exists in a region which has considerably different geological past from the southeast Anatolian ophiolite zone, Küre massif sulfide deposits comprise properties that could be classified within the Kieslager type, which is between Cyprus type and Kuroko type [2]. In the region, there exist the plagical sediments formed of subgrovacs and shales and also the toleitic basalt volcanites that are the products of the mid-ocean extension. It is seen that important tectonic movements occurred within the Küre formation. The units are intercepted with an N-S oriented fault. The mineralization takes place in the weak zone induced by this fault and also within the toleitic basalts and along the borders of the plagical sediments. The overall geologic map of the study area is demonstrated in Figure 1. The ore mass occurs within the altered basalt series that are a part of the Küre ophiolites and is overlain with black shale. The ore mass consists of coarse lenses broken with faults and thrusted. The ore, which is composed of pyrite and chalcopyrite, is in the form of massif lenses with high grades under the hanging wall black shale and in the form of stock work pyrite and chalcopyrite veins with low grades within the altered footwall formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Production Scheduling Optimization with Ventilation Constraints
    UNDERGROUND PRODUCTION SCHEDULING OPTIMIZATION WITH VENTILATION CONSTRAINTS by Andrea J. Brickey c Copyright by Andrea J. Brickey, 2015 All Rights Reserved A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Mining and Earth Systems Engineering). Golden, Colorado Date Signed: Andrea J. Brickey Signed: Dr. Mark Kuchta Thesis Advisor Signed: Dr. Alexandra Newman Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date Signed: Dr. Priscilla Nelson Professor and Head Department of Mining Engineering ii ABSTRACT Underground production scheduling has traditionally been a time-consuming, manual task in which the goal is to achieve corporate- or operation-defined production targets. This dissertation presents a generalized, mathematical formulation that results in a large- scale integer optimization model. The model maximizes discounted gold ounces mined and determines the optimal or near-optimal sequence of activities related to the development, extraction and backfilling of an underground mine. Constraints include physical precedence and resource capacities. The research uses data from an existing underground mine; how- ever, the model formulation has the ability to serve other underground mines with similarly structured data and provides the ability to customize constraints. Additionally, the model includes a constraint that treats available mine ventilation as a consumable resource. Diesel particulate matter, DPM, is a primary contaminant found
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Methods and Unit Operation
    MINING METHODS AND UNIT OPERATION STUDY MATERIAL Mr. Rakesh Behera Assistant Professor Department of Mineral Engineering Government College Of Engineering Keonjhar, Odisha SYLLABUS Module I Surface Mining : Deposits amenable to surface mining ; Box Cut ; Objectives types parameters and methods, production benches- Objectives ,formation and benches parameters ,Unit Operation and associated equipments ,Classification of surface mining systems. Module II Underground Coal Mining: Deposits amenable to underground coal mining Classification of underground coal mining methods, Board and Pillar Methods –general description and applications and merits and demerits, selection of panel size operation involved and associated equipment. Module III Long Wall Methods –Type and their general description ,applicability ,merits and demerits ,Selection of face length and panel length ,operation involved and associated equipments, Methods for mining steeply inclined seam and thick seams hydraulic mining. Module IV Underground Metal Mining: Deposits amenable to underground metal mining shape, size &position of drifts and cross cut, Raises and Winzes, classification of underground metal mining methods. Module V Stoping Methods - General description, applicability, Oprations involved and associated equipments for room pillar mining, Stope and pillar mining, stope and piellar mining, shrinkage, stoping, sub level stoping ,cut and fill stoping, VCR methods, Sub level caving and caving . Surface Mining ▪ Surface mining is a form of mining in which the soil and the rock covering the mineral deposits are removed. It is the other way of underground mining, in which the overlying rock is left behind, and the required mineral deposits are removed through shafts or tunnels. ▪ The traditional cone-shaped excavation (although it can be any shape, depending on the size and shape of the ore body) that is used when the ore body is typically pipe-shaped, vein-type, steeply dipping stratified or irregular.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Methods
    www.pwc.com 2012 Americas School of Mines Basics of Mining and Mineral Processing W Scott Dunbar University of British Columbia Agenda Geological Concepts Mining Methods Mineral Processing Methods Mine Waste Management Mining and Money A Future of Mining Mining Methods: The Topics Open pit mining Underground mining Mining equipment Mining operations PwC Mining Methods 3 Open pit mining Generally low grade, shallow orebodies Mining rate >20,000 tonnes per day Tailings pond Concentrator or Processing plant Waste dump Marketable product Waste Possible Ore expansion PwC Mining Methods 4 Open pit mining Open pit mines are used to exploit low grade, shallow ore bodies. However, some pits are quite deep – about 1 km. The mining rate is greater than 20,000 tonnes per day (tpd) but is usually much greater. Some pits operate at a rate of more than 100,000 tpd Open pit mining results in two waste streams: waste rock which contains no economic quantity of minerals but which must be removed to gain access to the orebody, and tailings which are the result of a mineral separation process in the concentrator or processing plant. The mining rate includes the mining of both waste and ore. Open pit mining is non‐selective – all high and low grade zones of the orebody are mined The significant design issues of an open pit mine are: location of haul roads, equipment – size of trucks and fleet, pit slope angle and stability, control of water PwC Mining Methods 5 Bagdad Pit, Arizona – looking west Porphyry copper 170,000 tpd 9,200 ft 5,800 ft pit 828 Mt sulfide and oxide reserves: 0.28% Cu, 0.022% Mo (2007 10K filing) Copper and Molybdenum concentrates Pressure leach facility for concentrate, SX/EW leach plant for oxides PwC Mining Methods 6 Notes: Bagdad Pit Arizona – looking west First claims staked in 1882.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Guide for Metal and Nonmetal Tailings Disposal
    Information Circular 8755 Design Guide for Metal and Nonmetal Tailings Disposal By Roy L. Soderberg and Richard A. Busch UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary BUREAU OF MINES As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interim hos responsibility fu most of our nationally owned public lands ond natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water re- sources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national pork and histmica1 places, and pviding fa the enjoyment of life through outdou recreation. The Deprtment assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests of all our people. The Department also has a major re- sponsibility fa American Indian reservation communities and fa people who live in Island Territaies under US. administration. This publication has been cataloged as follows: Soderberg, Roy L Design guide fm metal and nonmetal tailings disposal / by Roy L. Soderberg and Richard A. Busch. [Washington] : United States Depstment of the Interim, Bureau of Mines, 1977. 136 p. ; 27 cm. (Information circular - Bureau of Mines ; 8755) Bibliography: p. 107-111. 1. Tailings (Metallurgy). 2. Mineral industries - Wasre dis- posal. I. Busch, Richard k., joint author. 11. United Stares. Bureau of Mincs. UI. Title. IV. Series: United States. Bureau of Mincs. Information circular - Bureau of Mines ; 8755. TN23.U71 no. 8755 622.06173 U.S. Depr. of the Inr. Library For sale bp tbc Svpcriotcodcnt of DocumeoL1. USGwuoment prioting OMrr Wuhington. D.C. 20402 St& No.
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Mining Methods Teacher Information
    Underground Mining Methods Teacher Information Underground Mining Methods (Animations courtesy of Sandvik Tamrock Canada. Accompanying text by Terry Gong, UBC Mining Engi- neering student) Room and Pillar Mining Ramps (inclined tunnels) are excavated to connect the surface to the underground orebody. Drifts (hori- zontal tunnels) are excavated at different elevations to surround the orebody. Next, stopes (tunnels that have direct access to mining the ore) are mined to gain access to the ore. All tunnels are excavated by drilling and blasting. Jumbos are in charge of drilling the holes in the rocks and filling them with explo- sives. The loose rock, also called muck, is transported by either dump trucks or Load Haul Dump (LHD) vehicles back up to the surface for either waste disposal or processing. As mucking progresses, rooms (tunnels) are cut into the ore body. In order to provide safe roof support for mining, pillars of material around the rooms are left standing to hold up the rock ceiling above. Some parts of the mine roof can be particularly weak and fragile. In addition to pillar support, a jumbo is then brought back in forrock bolt- ing of the roof to ensure safety. When all the ore in the stopes has been transported up to surface, some pillars can be removed, since they still have valuable mineral content, while some must be left standing to provide active support for the ceiling. In some room and pillar mines, pillars are all excavated as min- ing nears completion, to allow the natural collapse of the roof. Cut and Fill Stoping In cut and fill stoping, the orebody is retrieved in horizontal slices beginning at the very bottom and advancing upwards towards the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook for Gold Prospectors in Washington
    STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BRIAN J. BOYLE, Commissioner of Public Lands ART STEARNS, Supervisor DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES RAYMOND LASMANIS, State Geologist INFORMATION CIRCULAR 57 HANDBOOK FOR GOLD PROSPECTORS IN WASHINGTON By WAYNE S. MOEN and MARSHALL T. HUNTTING 1975 Reprinted 1983 For sale by the Department of Natural Resources Price $2.00 PREFACE Because of increases over the past several years in gold prices, gold panning and prospecting is becoming increasingly popular. Few people realize that a small nugget about the size of a match head contains around $1 . 50 in go Id, whereas a nugget the size of a navy bean may sell for as much as $20. Any able-bodied person, equipped only with a gold pan and shovel, can work the gold-bearing streams of the state. Very few will get rich panning gold, but the lure of gold and the challenge to find it will always attract some individuals. Al­ though the richest placer gold deposits in Washington were worked out by 1900, the early-day placer miner failed to recover all the gold and some still remains hidden in stream gravels waiting to be found by a new generation of placer miners. In 1955, "Gold in Washington," by Marshall T. Huntting, was published by Washington Division of Mines and Geology. Although this publication has been out of print for several years, the demand for it remains constant. Rather than reprint this publication in its original form, it was decided to publish a new improved version of "Gold in Washington" under the new title of "Handbook for Gold Prospectors in Washington.
    [Show full text]