Great Lakes Entomologist

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Lakes Entomologist Vol. 32, No. 1 & 2 Spring/Summer 1999 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST PUBLISHED BY THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Volurne 32 No.1 & 2 ISSN 0090-0222 TABLE OF CONTENTS New records of Ohio long-horned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Robert A. Androw and George D. Keeney...................................... 0 A new Flexomio (Homoptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) from Southern Michigan James A. Bess and K. G. A. Hamilton......................................... 9 Seasonal response of workers of the Allegheny mound ant, Formico exsectoides (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) to artificial honeydews of varying nutritional content Catherine M. Bristow and Ellen Yanity. .... 15 Aeshna subarctica (Odonata: Aeshnidae) in northwestern Wisconsin Robert B. DuBois, Robbye Johnson and Shoun Putz. .......................... 29 Dead-leaf clusters as habitats for adult Co/liodis temnostethoides and Cordiostethus luride/lus and other Anthocoridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) John D. Lattin .. .. 33 New records and biological notes on species of Cleridae (Coleoptera) from the Adirondack Mountains, New York Jonathan R. Mawdsley................................................... 39 Ground beetle range extensions: six new Ohio records [Coleoptera: Carabidae) F. F. Purrington, R. Chris Stanton and David J. Horn. ... 47 A list of Wisconsin springtails with new records and annotations [Hexapoda: Parainsecta: Collembola) E. J. Rebek, D. K. Young and D. B. Hagg...................................... 51 Road mortality of dragonflies [Odonata) in a Great Lakes wetland Samuel Keith Riffell.. ................................... 63 Gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) feeding on purple loosestrife in Michigan Donald C. Sebolt and Douglas A. Landis ...................................... 75 Timing of Karner blue '(Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) larvae in spring and adults in spring and summer in Wisconsin during 1991-98 Ann B. Swengel and Scott R. Swengel.. .................. 77 Attraction of Pedilus lugubris (Coleoptera: Pyrochroidae) to Epicauta murina and Epicouta fobricii [Coleoptera: Meloidae) and new food plant records for Epicauta spp. Andrew H. Williams and Daniel K. Young.. .................. 97 COVER PHOTO Chauliodes sp. (Megaloptera: Corydalidae). Photo by David C. Houghton. THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 1999-2000 OFFICERS President Ron Priest Immediate Past President Leah Bauer Treasurer M. C. Nielsen Secretary Robert Kriegel Journal Editor Randall Cooper Newsletter Editor Robert Haack Associate Newsletter Editor Therese Poland The Michigan Entomological traces its origins to the old Detroit Society and was on 4 November to " ... promote the ofentomology in branches and by and to advance cooperation and good fellowship among persons inter· osted in attempts to facilitate the exchange of ideas and information in both amateur and encourages the study of insects by youth. lVU"IlILJer',,"lU the Society, serves the North States and adjacent Canada, is open to all persons terested in entomology. There are four paying classes of membership: Student (to 12th dues $5.00 Active~annual Institutional~annual dues $85.00 Sustaining~annual contrihution $25.00 or more Life~$300.00 Dues are paid on a calendar year basis (Jan. I-Dec. 31). Memberships accepted before 1 shall begin on the ,January 1; me-ml)ershi cepted at a later date shall following January 1 earlier date is re'1w,steCl the required dues paid. members in good standing receive the Newsletter of the lished quarterly. All active and sustaining members may vote Society affairs. All dues and contributions to the Society are deductible for Federal income t.ax purposes. SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION Institutions and as well as individuals not may subscribe to The Entomologist at the rate of published subs(;riI)ti()llS are accepted on a volume issues) basis. Single copies of The are ayailable at each, with 20 percent discount for 25 or more EllI1'lCiN: Positive microfilm copies of the current volume of The Great Lakes En, tomologist will be available at nominal cost, to members and bona fide subscribers ofthe paper edi· tion only, at the end of each volume year. Please address all orders and inquiries to University Mi­ crofilms, Inc .. 300 Zeeb linn Arbor, Michigan 48106, USA. Inquiries about back subscriptions and business should be directed to the Sec· retary, Michigan Society, Department of Michigan State East Lansing, USA. Manuscripts and correspondence should he rected to the Edit.or inside back cover). Copyright © 1999. The Michigan Entomological Society 1999 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST NEW RECORDS OF OHIO LONG-HORNED BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE) Robert A. Androw! and George D. Keeney2 ABSTRACT Recorded from Ohio for the first time are eleven species of Cerambycidae: Arhopalus rusticus obsoletus, Tetropium schwarzianum, Parelaphidion as­ persum, Anthophylax attenuatus, Acmaeops proteus proteus, Goes variegatus, Ataxia brunnea, Styloleptus biustus, Eutrichillus biguttatus, and Oberea fiavipes. Confirming records are given for four other species: Tilloclytus gemi­ natus, Lepturges pictus, Lepturges angulatus and Plectrodera scalator. Tetropium cinnamopterum is tentatively recorded from Ohio from one speci­ men with questionable data. New biological information is presented for sev­ eral of the species recorded herein. The family Cerambycidae has been well studied in Ohio over the years, most notably by Josef N. Knull of The Ohio State University. Knull (1946) listed 262 species then known or suspected to occur in the state. Ofthe total, only 222 represented confirmed Ohio records. The new records presented herein increase that total to 237 species confirmed for the state. Revisions of the family by Linsley (1962a, 1962b, 1963, 1964) and Linsley and Chemsak (1972, 1976, 1984, 1995) treated all of the species in North America north of Mexico, reiterating some of Knull's records for Ohio, but giving very few individual records for the state. Their range maps often showed no Ohio records while indicating many records from neighboring states. This may reflect the generality of many of Knull's records, as he often listed species as being "common in Ohio" or "abundant throughout the state" without listing any specific localities ofoccurrence. Since Knull's work, little has been published specifically on the Ceramby­ cidae of Ohio, and extensive collecting in recent years by the authors has pro­ duced many additional records and observations. A search of several institu­ tional collections in Ohio produced little new information as most were well studied by Knull and a very small amount of new material has been added since his studies. However, a closer study of the Ohio State University Col­ lection provided several of the new records, by the correction ofmisidentifica­ tions. Some of these may have been present during Knull's study of the mate­ rial, but as most involved the taxonomically difficult genus Lepturges it is understandable how the specimens could have been misidentified, as they often are in many large collections of Cerambycidae. From these observa­ tions, we are certain that some of the specimens considered by Knull to be lCarnegie Museum of Natural History, Section of Invertebrate Zoology, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. 2The Ohio State University, Department of Entomology, 1735 Neil Avenue, Colum­ bus, OH 43210. 2 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 32/ No. 1 & 2 Lepturges confluens (Haldeman) were in fact Lepturges angulatus (LeConte). We also conclude that most, if not all, of the published Ohio records for Pare­ laphidion incertum (Newman) represent specimens of Parelaphidion asper­ sum (Haldeman), a species common in Ohio. The authors have not yet seen a specimen of P incertum from the state. The following abbreviations have been used for the collections in which the specimens have been deposited: RAAC = the Robert A. Androw Collec­ tion; GDKC the George D. Keeney Collection; OSUC the Ohio State Uni­ versity Collection; CMNH = Carnegie Museum of Natural Collection; JAGC Joseph A. Green Collection; EGCC = the Eric G. man Collec­ tion; SJSC Steven J. Schott Collection; MJSC = the Mic J. Silvaggio Collection. Following each collection record are parentheses containing the number taken on that date and the collection in which the spec­ imens have deposited. Unless otherwise stated, specimens were col­ lected by the owner of the collection in which they are deposited. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Subfamily Aseminae Arhopalus rusticus obsoletus (Randall). Knull (1946:150) referred to this species as "sure to occur in Ohio", Linsley (1962a:75) gave the range as "Boreal North America west to Rocky Mountains ...". We confirmed the pres­ ence of this species in Ohio by the capture of five specimens, four at white light, one at UV light. NEW STATE RECORD. Hocking County: Hocking Hills State Park, 8 August 1993, Norm Brown, colI. (I-SJSC); 7 miles south of Logan, KOA Campground on Route 664, 18 August 1994, at light (1-EGCC). Ross County: Scioto Trail State Park, 12 August 1985 (I-RAAC), Scioto County: Shawnee State Park, 12 August 1985 (I-RAAC), 27 July 1990, MV light (2­ JAGC), Vinton County: Lake Hope State Park, 27 July 1995, UV light (1­ RAAC). Tetropium schwarzianum Casey. Knull (1946) recorded Tetropium ve­ lutinum LeConte as likely to occur in Ohio, but that species as it is currently known is confined to the Pacific coast and northern Rocky Mountains (Lins­ ley 1962a). The species to which Knull referred is most
Recommended publications
  • Cinara Cupressivora W Atson & Voegtlin, 1999 Other Scientific Names: Order and Family: Hemiptera: Aphididae Common Names: Giant Cypress Aphid; Cypress Aphid
    O R E ST E ST PE C IE S R O FIL E F P S P November 2007 Cinara cupressivora W atson & Voegtlin, 1999 Other scientific names: Order and Family: Hemiptera: Aphididae Common names: giant cypress aphid; cypress aphid Cinara cupressivora is a significant pest of Cupressaceae species and has caused serious damage to naturally regenerating and planted forests in Africa, Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean and the Near East. It is believed to have originated on Cupressus sempervirens from eastern Greece to just south of the Caspian Sea (Watson et al., 1999). This pest has been recognized as a separate species for only a short time (Watson et al., 1999) and much of the information on its biology and ecology has been reported under the name Cinara cupressi. Cypress aphids (Photos: Bugwood.org – W .M . Ciesla, Forest Health M anagement International (left, centre); J.D. W ard, USDA Forest Service (right)) DISTRIBUTION Native: eastern Greece to just south of the Caspian Sea Introduced: Africa: Burundi (1988), Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia (2004), Kenya (1990), Malawi (1986), Mauritius (1999), Morocco, Rwanda (1989), South Africa (1993), Uganda (1989), United Republic of Tanzania (1988), Zambia (1985), Zimbabwe (1989) Europe: France, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom Latin America and Caribbean: Chile (2003), Colombia Near East: Jordan, Syria, Turkey, Yemen IDENTIFICATION Giant conifer aphid adults are typically 2-5 mm in length, dark brown in colour with long legs (Ciesla, 2003a). Their bodies are sometimes covered with a powdery wax. They typically occur in colonies of 20-80 adults and nymphs on the branches of host trees (Ciesla, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Cinara Cupressivora
    62 Global review of forest pests and diseases Cinara cupressivora Order and Family: Hemiptera: Aphididae Common names: giant cypress aphid; cypress aphid Cinara cupressivora Watson & Voegtlin, 1999 is a significant pest of Cupressaceae species and has caused serious damage to naturally regenerated and planted forests in Africa, Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean and the Near East. It is believed to have originated on Cupressus sempervirens from eastern Greece to just south of the Caspian Sea (Watson et al., 1999). This pest has been recognized as a separate species for only a short time (Watson et al., 1999) and much of the information on its biology and ecology has been reported under the name Cinara cupressi. BUGWOOD.ORG/W.M. CIESLA/3948001 BUGWOOD.ORG/W.M. CIESLA/3948002 BUGWOOD.ORG/W.M. BUGWOOD.ORG/J.D. WARD/2912011 Cypress aphids DISTRIBUTION Native: Europe and the Near East: eastern Greece to Islamic Republic of Iran Introduced: Africa: Burundi (1988), Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia (2004), Kenya (1990), Malawi (1986), Mauritius (1999), Morocco, Rwanda (1989), South Africa (1993), Uganda (1989), United Republic of Tanzania (1988), Zambia (1985), Zimbabwe (1989) Europe: France, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom Latin America and Caribbean: Chile (2003), Colombia Near East: Jordan, the Syrian Arab Republic, Turkey, Yemen IDENTIFICATION Giant conifer aphid adults are typically 2 to 5 mm in length, dark brown in colour with long legs (Ciesla, 2003a). Their bodies are sometimes covered with a powdery wax. They typically occur in colonies of 20 to 80 adults and nymphs on the branches of host trees (Ciesla, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods and Nematodes: Functional Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems
    2 Arthropods and Nematodes: Functional Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems Pio Federico Roversi and Roberto Nannelli CRA – Research Centre for Agrobiology and Pedology, Florence Italy 1. Introduction Despite the great diversity of habitats grouped under a single name, forests are ecosystems characterized by the dominance of trees, which condition not only the epigeal environment but also life in the soil. Unlike other ecosystems such as grasslands or annual agricultural crops, forests are well characterized by precise spatial structures. In fact, we can identify three main layers in all forests: a canopy layer of tree crowns, including not only green photosynthesizing organs but also branches of various sizes; a layer formed by the tree trunks; a layer including bushes and grasses, which can sometimes be missing when not enough light filters through the canopy. To these layers must be added the litter and soil, which houses the root systems. Other characteristic features of forests, in addition to their structural complexity, are the longevity of the plants, the peculiar microclimates and the presence of particular habitats not found outside of these biocoenoses, such as fallen trunks and tree hollows. Even in the case of woods managed with relatively rapid cycles to produce firewood, forests are particularly good examples of ecosystems organized into superimposed layers that allow the maximum use of the solar energy. The biomass of forests is largely stored in the trees, with the following general distribution: ca. 2% in the leaves and almost 98% in trunks, branches and roots. In conditions of equilibrium between the arboreal vegetation and animal populations, saprophages, which use parts of plants and remains of organisms ending up in the litter, play a very important role.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings, 23Rd U.S. Department of Agriculture Interagency Research
    United States Department of Proceedings Agriculture 23rd U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Northern Interagency Research Forum on Research Station Invasive Species 2012 General Technical Report NRS-P-114 The findings and conclusions of each article in this publication are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service. All articles were received in digital format and were edited for uniform type and style. Each author is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her paper. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal, agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fi sh or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. Cover graphic by Vincent D’Amico, U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station. Manuscript received for publication August 2012 Published by: For additional copies: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytogenetic Analysis, Heterochromatin
    insects Article Cytogenetic Analysis, Heterochromatin Characterization and Location of the rDNA Genes of Hycleus scutellatus (Coleoptera, Meloidae); A Species with an Unexpected High Number of rDNA Clusters Laura Ruiz-Torres, Pablo Mora , Areli Ruiz-Mena, Jesús Vela , Francisco J. Mancebo , Eugenia E. Montiel, Teresa Palomeque and Pedro Lorite * Department of Experimental Biology, Genetics Area, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain; [email protected] (L.R.-T.); [email protected] (P.M.); [email protected] (A.R.-M.); [email protected] (J.V.); [email protected] (F.J.M.); [email protected] (E.E.M.); [email protected] (T.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: The family Meloidae contains approximately 3000 species, commonly known as blister beetles for their ability to secrete a substance called cantharidin, which causes irritation and blistering in contact with animal or human skin. In recent years there have been numerous studies focused on the anticancer action of cantharidin and its derivatives. Despite the recent interest in blister beetles, cytogenetic and molecular studies in this group are scarce and most of them use only classical chromosome staining techniques. The main aim of our study was to provide new information in Citation: Ruiz-Torres, L.; Mora, P.; Meloidae. In this study, cytogenetic and molecular analyses were applied for the first time in the Ruiz-Mena, A.; Vela, J.; Mancebo, F.J.; family Meloidae. We applied fluorescence staining with DAPI and the position of ribosomal DNA in Montiel, E.E.; Palomeque, T.; Lorite, P. Hycleus scutellatus was mapped by FISH. Hycleus is one of the most species-rich genera of Meloidae Cytogenetic Analysis, but no cytogenetic data have yet been published for this particular genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri State Wildlife Action Plan Missouri Department of Conservation Conserving Healthy Fish, Forests, and Wildlife 2015
    Missouri State Wildlife Action Plan Missouri Department of Conservation CONSERVING HEALTHY FISH, FORESTS, AND WILDLIFE 2015 Missouri State Wildlife Action Plan 2015 Missouri is a national leader in fish, forest, and wildlife conservation due to Missouri citizens’ unique and proactive support of conservation efforts. The Conservation Department continues to build on our 79- year legacy of citizen-led conservation by outlining strategic priorities for the future to help us successfully manage fish, forest, and wildlife. Each of these priorities ties directly back to the heart of our mission: to manage and protect the fish, forest, and wildlife resources of the state and to provide opportunities for all citizens to use, enjoy, and learn about those resources. - Robert L. Ziehmer, Director Missouri Department of Conservation Missouri State Wildlife Action Plan 2015 FOREWORD issouri supports an abundant natural heri- examples of the state’s original natural communities tage, ranking 21st in the nation in terms of and outstanding biological diversity. The Depart- Mits numbers of native animal and plant spe- ment’s science-based efforts, aimed at understand- cies. There are over 180 native fish species, includ- ing life-history needs and habitat system dynamics, ing the endemic Niangua darter, that ply the state’s have benefited a variety of Missouri species, includ- aquatic habitats. More than 100 species of native ing recovery efforts of the American burying beetle, amphibians and reptiles occur in a myriad of habitats Ozark hellbender, eastern hellbender, eastern collared from mountain-top glades to lowland swamps. Mis- lizard, prairie massasauga rattlesnake, greater prai- souri supports nationally significant river and stream rie-chicken, bald eagle, peregrine falcon, pallid and systems, some of the largest forested tracts left in the lake sturgeons, Niangua darter, Topeka shiner, Virgin- Midwest, a high density of cave and karst features, ia sneezeweed, geocarpon, and Missouri bladderpod.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 42, Number 2 June 2015
    Wisconsin Entomological Society N e w s I e t t e r Volume 42, Number 2 June 2015 Monitoring and Management - A That is, until volunteer moth surveyor, Steve Sensible Pairing Bransky, came onto the scene. Steve had By Beth Goeppinger, Wisconsin Department done a few moth and butterfly surveys here ofN atural Resources and there on the property. But that changed in 2013. Armed with mercury vapor lights, Richard Bong State Recreation Area is a bait and a Wisconsin scientific collector's heavily used 4,515 acre property in the permit, along with our permission, he began Wisconsin State Park system. It is located in surveying in earnest. western Kenosha County. The area is oak woodland, savanna, wetland, sedge meadow, He chose five sites in woodland, prairie and old field and restored and remnant prairie. savanna habitats. He came out many nights Surveys of many kinds and for many species in the months moths might be flying. After are done on the property-frog and toad, finding that moth populations seemed to drift fence, phenology, plants, ephemeral cycle every 3-5 days, he came out more ponds, upland sandpiper, black tern, frequently. His enthusiasm, dedication and grassland and marsh birds, butterfly, small never-ending energy have wielded some mammal, waterfowl, muskrat and wood surprising results. Those results, in turn, ducks to name a few. Moths, except for the have guided us in our habitat management showy and easy-to-identify species, have practices. been ignored. Of the 4,500 moth species found in the state, Steve has confirmed close to 1,200 on the property, and he isn't done yet! He found one of the biggest populations of the endangered Papaipema silphii moths (Silphium borer) in the state as well as 36 species of Catocola moths (underwings), them.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R
    Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R. and Zeuss, D. 2016. Colour lightness of dragonfly assemblages across North America and Europe. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.02578 Supplementary material Appendix 1 Figures A1–A12, Table A1 and A2 1 Figure A1. Scatterplots between female and male colour lightness of 44 North American (Needham et al. 2000) and 19 European (Askew 1988) dragonfly species. Note that colour lightness of females and males is highly correlated. 2 Figure A2. Correlation of the average colour lightness of European dragonfly species illustrated in both Askew (1988) and Dijkstra and Lewington (2006). Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Note that the extracted colour values of dorsal dragonfly drawings from both sources are highly correlated. 3 Figure A3. Frequency distribution of the average colour lightness of 152 North American and 74 European dragonfly species. Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Rugs at the abscissa indicate the value of each species. Note that colour values are from different sources (North America: Needham et al. 2000, Europe: Askew 1988), and hence absolute values are not directly comparable. 4 Figure A4. Scatterplots of single ordinary least-squares regressions between average colour lightness of 8,127 North American dragonfly assemblages and mean temperature of the warmest quarter. Red dots represent assemblages that were excluded from the analysis because they contained less than five species. Note that those assemblages that were excluded scatter more than those with more than five species (c.f. the coefficients of determination) due to the inherent effect of very low sampling sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Boring Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae) in White Spruce (Picea Glauca (Moench) Voss) Ecosystems of Alaska
    United States Department of Agriculture Effect of Ecosystem Disturbance Forest Service on Diversity of Bark and Wood- Pacific Northwest Research Station Boring Beetles (Coleoptera: Research Paper PNW-RP-546 April 2002 Scolytidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae) in White Spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) Ecosystems of Alaska Richard A. Werner This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommenda- tions for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate state and federal agencies, or both, before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. Author Richard A. Werner was a research entomologist (retired), Pacific Northwest Research Station, 8080 NW Ridgewood Drive, Corvallis, OR 97330. He is currently a volunteer at the Pacific Northwest Research Station conducting research for the Long Term Ecological Research Program in Alaska. Abstract Werner, Richard A. 2002. Effect of ecosystem disturbance on diversity of bark and wood-boring beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae) in white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) ecosystems of Alaska. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-546. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 15 p. Fire and timber harvest are the two major disturbances that alter forest ecosystems in interior Alaska. Both types of disturbance provide habitats that attract wood borers and bark beetles the first year after the disturbance, but populations then decrease to levels below those in undisturbed sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Publications of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Cascade Range, Oregon: 1998 Supplement
    United States Department of Research Publications of the Agriculture Forest Service H.J. Andrews Experimental Pacific Northwest Research Station Forest, Cascade Range, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-427 Oregon: 1998 Supplement July 1998 On the occasion of the 50th Anniversary of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest 1948-98 Compilers DONALD L. HENSHAW is a statistician, SARAH E. GREENE is a forest ecologist, and TAMI LOWRY is an editorial assistant, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97331. Research Publications of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Cascade Range, Oregon: 1998 Supplement Donald L. Henshaw, Sarah E. Greene, and Tami Lowry Compilers Published by: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon General Technical Report PNW-GTR-427 July 1998 Abstract Henshaw, Donald L.; Greene, Sarah E.; Lowry, Tami, comps. 1998. Research publications of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Cascade Range, Oregon:1998 supplement. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-427. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 94 p. This bibliography updates the list of publications, abstracts, theses, and unpublished reports included in “Research Publications of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Cascade Range, Oregon, 1948 to 1986” (General Technical Report PNW-GTR-201) and “Research Publications of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Cascade Range, Oregon: 1988 Supplement” (General Technical Report PNW-GTR-223). Citations are referenced under appropriate keywords. Keywords: Bibliography, experimental forest, research publications. Contents 1 Introduction 2 Acknowledgment 2 Literature Cited 2 Bibliography 62 Keyword Index Introduction This bibliography updates the 1987 (McKee and others 1987) and 1988 (Blinn and others 1988) publications that list research publications of the H.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Ology July-August 2011 Entomology 5004.Xls Page 1
    Tri-ology July-August 2011 entomology_5004.xls Page 1 Arthropod Common Plants Plants Acres Acres Sample Via State/ Plant Species Plant Common Name Arthropod Species Collection Date Location Type City, State County Collector Collector Institution Severity Record Collection Method Name Involved Affected Involved Affected Number Country Notes Karolynne M. Artocarpus Griffiths; Andrew I. heterophyllus jackfruit Nipaecoccus viridis Lebbeck mealybug 29-Jun-2011 Nursery Lake Worth, FL Palm Beach Derksen USDA; CAPS 50+ 7+ Severe E-2011-4264 HOST Hand Catch This is a polyphagous species, occurring on 35 plant families (Dr. Ian C. Stocks). Haylett Cruz-Escoto; Pseudococcus RosaMaria M. Basella alba Ceylon spinach jackbeardsleyi a mealybug 25-Aug-2011 Nursery Miami, FL Miami-Dade Quiñones DPI 50% Moderate E-2011-5963 HOST Hand Catch Amber L. Roux; Lane Agriculture P. Southerland; diamondback Interdiction Dyrana N. Russell- INTERDICTION Brassica oleracea broccoli, cauliflower Plutella xylostella moth 16-Aug-2011 Station 6B Live Oak, FL Suwannee Hughes DPI; CAPS 960 cases 3 boxes Slight E-2011-5543 INTERCEPTION Hand Catch Mexico field mustard, rape Aleurodicus Brassica rapa mustard rugioperculatus a whitefly 2-Aug-2011 Residence Leisure City, FL Miami-Dade William R. Graves UF, retired E-2011-5127 HOST Hand Catch Maracaibo lignumvitae; Tetraleurodes Morgan Levy Bulnesia arborea verawood acaciae acacia whitefly 9-Aug-2011 Park Doral, FL Miami-Dade Olga Garcia DPI 2 2 Slight E-2011-5318 HOST Hand Catch Agriculture This is a serious pest of solanaceous crops. It can transmit Candidatus Liberibacter sp. It Interdiction Amber L. Roux; Lane INTERDICTION is not established in Florida. Skins and honeydew were found under the calyx of the Capsicum annuum pepper Bactericera cockerelli potato psyllid 16-Aug-2011 Station 6B Live Oak, FL Suwannee P.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Strategy for the Hine's Emerald
    Photo: C.G. Evans Hine’s Emerald (Somatochlora hineana) in Ontario Ontario Recovery Strategy Series Recovery strategy prepared under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 Ministry of Natural Resources About the Ontario Recovery Strategy Series This series presents the collection of recovery strategies that are prepared or adopted as advice to the Province of Ontario on the recommended approach to recover species at risk. The Province ensures the preparation of recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada. What is recovery? What’s next? Recovery of species at risk is the process by which the Nine months after the completion of a recovery strategy decline of an endangered, threatened, or extirpated a government response statement will be published species is arrested or reversed, and threats are which summarizes the actions that the Government of removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of a Ontario intends to take in response to the strategy. species’ persistence in the wild. The implementation of recovery strategies depends on the continued cooperation and actions of government agencies, individuals, communities, land users, and What is a recovery strategy? conservationists. Under the ESA a recovery strategy provides the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to For more information achieve recovery of a species. A recovery strategy outlines the habitat needs and the threats to the To learn more about species at risk recovery in Ontario, survival and recovery of the species. It also makes please visit the Ministry of Natural Resources Species at recommendations on the objectives for protection and Risk webpage at: www.ontario.ca/speciesatrisk recovery, the approaches to achieve those objectives, and the area that should be considered in the development of a habitat regulation.
    [Show full text]