DOCSLIB.ORG

Hitchhiker F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hitchhiker F NASA-TM-I09225 ,,/JA S ,'_ •/.J- 3/- -7-_ / _/7_/5"- S . -,.j Hitchhiker f_ Customer Accommodations & Requirements Specifications HHG-730-1503-06 1992 (NASA-TM-I09225) HITCHHIKER: N93-3Z644 CUSTOMER ACCOMMODATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATIONS (CARS} (NASA) 315 p Unclas G3/81 0177615 Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland I i ..I J Hitchhiker Customer Accommodations & Requirements Specifications HHG-730-1503-06 1992 Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland DATE: APPROVED BY: 2r i_+.( Fred Huegel Electrical Systems (Flight) Ben Lui [ " Electrical S_stems (Ground) Mark Steiner Systems Integration ? C-_g To61ey Mechanical Systems _-J<':-7/ Paul Fraser Flight Assurance \ Kathleen Jenkins e_ Systems Safety Theodore Mich_ek Thermal Systems Deborah Knapp Mission Operations /_ /_ /<_1 Lawrence Thomas Customer Support Theodore Goldsmith Project Manager Shuttle Small Payloads Project i Changes* to HITCHHIKER CUSTOMER ACCOMMODATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATIONS HHG-730-1503-06 Change No. Date Nature of Change Initials Recipients of thq original distribution of this document will automatically receive changes. Others can request changes In a memo to the SSPP Customer Support Office (CSO), Code 740.3, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771. ill i r E TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 \ 1.1 PURPOSE ..................................................... 1 1.2 CUSTOMER PAYLOAD REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT .................... 1 1.3 HH PROJECT ORGANIZATION ..................................... 2 1.4 POINTS OF CONTACT ............................................ 2 1.5 HITCHHIKER PAYLOAD MANIFESTING ............................... 3 1.6 SPACE SHUTTLE HITCHHIKER ACCOMMODATIONS ..................... 7 1.7 TRANSPORTATION AND INTEGRATION COSTS ......................... 8 1.7.1 Integration Cost SECTION 2 2. THE HITCHHIKER CARRIER SYSTEM ................................ 1 2.1 MECHANICAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS .................................. 2 2.1.1 HH Canister .................................................. 12 2.1.2 PLATE MOUNTING ............................................. 27 2.1.3 Direct Mounting of Experiment Package ............................. 29 2.1.4 HH-M Structure ................................................ 29 2.2 THERMAL CONSIDERATIONS ..................................... 41 2.2.1 Thermal System Design (Canister) .................................. 41 2.2.2 Thermistors .................................................. 49 2.2.3 Customer Thermal Responsibilities for Plate Mounting ................... 52 2.3 ELECTRICAL/POWER SUPPORT SYSTEMS ............................ 52 2,3.1 Electrical/Power System Design ................................... 52 2.3.2 DC Power Ripple and Transient Limits ............................... 63 2.4 COMMAND AND COMMUNICATION SUPPORT SYSTEM ................. 67 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 2,4.1 Transparent Data System ........................................ 67 2.4.2 Bi-Level Command System ....................................... 75 2.4.3 Serial Command System ......................................... 78 2.4.4 Asynchronous Uplink ........................................... 83 2.4.5 Asynchronous Downlink ......................................... 89 2.4.6 Medium-Rate Ku-Band Downlink ................................... 91 2.4.7 Pulse Code Modulation (PCM) Telemetry ............................. 97 2.4.8 Inter-Range Instrumentation Group, Type B (IRIG-B) MET Signal ........... 102 2.4.9 CGSE Interface ................................................ 106 2.4.10 Crew Control (CC) ............................................. 129 2.4,11 Undedicated Connections in Standard Interface ........................ !29 2.4.12 Orbiter CCTV Interface .......................................... 134 SECTION 3 . CUSTOMER/NASA RESPONSIBILITIES ............................... 1 3.1 CUSTOMER RESPONSIBILITIES .................................... 1 3.1.1 CUSTOMER PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT RESPONSIBILITIES ............... 1 3.1.2 CUSTOMER PRE-MISSION RESPONSIBILITIES .......... ,. ............ 18 3.1.3 MISSION OPERATIONS RESPONSIBILITIES ........................... 19 3,1.4 POST-MISSION RESPONSIBILITIES ................................. 19 3.2 HH AND/OR SPACE SHU'I-rLE ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES ....... 19 3.3 GSFC RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................ 21 3.4 PAYLOAD REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTATION ........................ 21 3.5 HH MANIFESTING SCENARIO ..................................... 22 3.6 OPERATIONS OVERVIEW ........................................ 24 vl TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION A A. PAYLOAD SAFETY REQUIREMENTS 11 OVERVIEW .................................................... 1 2. RESPONSIBILITIES .............................................. 1 3. SAFETY REVIEW PROCESS ....................................... 2 4. PAYLOAD HAZARD ANALYSIS ...................................... 4 4.1 PAYLOAD SAFETY MATRIX ........................................ 8 4.2 DESCRIPTIVE DATA FORM ....................................... 11 4.3 PAYLOAD HAZARD REPORT ...................................... 14 4.4 PAYLOAD SAFETY NONCOMPLIANCE REPORT (WAIVER) ................ 16 4.5 ADDITIONAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS .............................. 18 5. SAFETY DATA PACKAGE (SDP) ................................... 25 SECTION B B. MATERIALS 1. OVERVIEW .................................................... 1 2. MATERIALS REVIEW PROCESS .................................... 1 3. LIST OF CANDIDATE MATERIALS ................................... 2 SECTION C C. DATA PRODUCTS AND FORMATS o LRDPS CUSTOMER TAPE ......................................... 1 2. MRDPS CUSTOMER TAPE ........................................ 6 2.1 CMRT Identification .............................................. 6 2.2 CMRT File ..................................................... 6 2.3 CMRT Records ................................................. 6 vii TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION D D. OPERATIONS FACILITIES 1. OVERVIEW ....................................................... 1 2. COMMAND AND TELEMETRY PROCESSING CAPABILITIES .................. 3 SECTION E E. CUSTOMER PAYLOAD REQUIREMENTS (CPR) 1, INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 . PAYLOAD DESCRIPTION .......................................... 4 2,1 MISSION OBJECTIVES ........................................... 4 2.2 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION ......................................... 4 2,3 PAYLOAD FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION AND METHOD ................... 4 2.4 OPERATIONAL SCENARIO ........................................ 7 3. PAYLOAD REQUIREMENTS FOR CARRIER STANDARD SERVICES .......... 7 3.1 CARRIER TO PAYLOAD ELECTRICAL INTERFACES ...................... 7 %.J 3.2 CARRIER TO PAYLOAD MECHANICAL INTERFACES ..................... 7 3.3 CARRIER TO PAYLOAD THERMAL INTERFACES ........................ 9 3.4 CUSTOMER SUPPLIED GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (CGSE) ........... 9 3.5 OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS ..................................... 9 3.6 GROUND OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS ............................ 12 3.7 SAFETY ..................................................... 13 3.7,1 SAFETY MATRIX ............................................... 14 4. PAYLOAD REQUIREMENTS FOR OPTIONAL SERVICES .................. 14 SECTION F F, THERMAL BLANKET REQUIREMENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY .................................... 1 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR HH APPLICATION .............................. 1 viii TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 2.1 TEMPERATURE EXTREMES ....................................... 1 2.2 HUMIDITY ..................................................... 2 2.3 LAUNCH AND RE-ENTRY PRESSURE TRANSIENTS ...................... 2 2.4 OFF-GASSING CONSTRAINTS ...................................... 3 2.5 GROUNDING ................................................... 3 2.6 EXTERNAL COATING REFLECTANCE ................................ 3 2.7 FLAMMABILITY ................................................. 4 2.8 ACCELERATION, VIBRATION, AND ACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENTS ............ 4 2.9 WEIGHT ...................................................... 4 2.10 OTHER FACTORS ............................................... 4 3. REFERENCES .................................................. 5 SECTION G G. ALGORITHMS FOR ATTITUDE CONVERSIONS . INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 2. ANALYTICAL APPROACH ......................................... 1 3. PC PROGRAMMING APPROACH .................................... 6 4. GSFC CONTACT ................................................. 9 SECTION H Excerpts from Volume XIV, ICD 2-19001 SHUTTLE ORBITER/CARGO STANDARD INTERFACES REVISION J, May 1988 SECTION I LISTING OF APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS SECTION J ACRONYM LIST LiST OF FIGURES Paae _J 1.1 Request for Flight Assignment (NASA Form 1628) .................... 1-4 2.1 HH-G Carrier Components ....................................... 2-4 2.2 HH-G SPOC Plate Structural Assembly ............................. 2-5 2.3 HH-G Available Sidewall Mounting Locations ........................ 2-6 2.4 HH-G Typical Structural Configuration ............................. 2-7 2.5 HH-G Payload Mounting Concept (Sideview) ........................ 2-8 2.6 Orbiter Coordinate System ................ ...................... 2-9 2.7 Maximum Payload Static and Dynamic Envelope - Small Plate Layout ...... 2-10 2.8 Maximum Payload Static and Dynamic Envelope SPOC Plate Layout ...... 2-11 2.9 Hitchhiker Sealed Canister ...................................... 2-14 2.10 Hitchhiker Motorized
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1985 Twenty-Second Space Congress Program
    Space Congress Programs 4-23-1985 1985 Twenty-Second Space Congress Program Canaveral Council of Technical Societies Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-programs Scholarly Commons Citation Canaveral Council of Technical Societies, "1985 Twenty-Second Space Congress Program" (1985). Space Congress Programs. 26. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-programs/26 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Space Congress Programs by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. en c en 2 w a: 0 CJ CJ z w 0 UJ 0 I w > 0 1- <( 2 D.. w en .·;: ' I- Cocoa Beach, Florida April 23, 24, 25, 26, 1985 CHAIRMAN'S MESSAGE The theme of the Twenty­ Second Space Congress is Space and Society - Pro­ gress and Promise. This is appropriate for the matu­ rity of world wide space activities as well as descrip­ tive of the planned pro­ gram. Congressman Don Fuqua, Chairman, Committee on Science & Technology will present the keynote address followed by a high level DOD Panel describing multi­ service space activities. To- day's space program wil l be further discussed in sessions covering Space Shuttle Operational Efficiency, Spacelab Missions, Getaway Specials, and International Space Programs. Society is not only more aware but also becoming directly active in Space through Getaway Specials on Shuttle as well as the advent of major activities to be covered in a panel on Commercialization. Other near term new initiatives are covered in panels on Space Defense Initiative and Space Station Plans & Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitchhiker on Space Station ISS Hitchhrker STUDY
    Hitchhiker On Space Station Gerard Daelemans NASA Goddard Space FlightCenter (301) 286-2193 Theodore Goldsmith Swales Aerospace Inc. (301) 902-4536 ABSTRACT The NASA/GSFC ShuttleSmall PayloadsProjectsOffice(SSPPO) has been studyingthe feasibilityof migrating Hitchhikercustomers pastpresentand futureto the InternationalSpace Stationvia a "Hitchhikerlike"carrier system.SSPPO has been taskedto make themost use of existinghardware and soft-waresystemsand infrastructurein itsstudyof an ISS based carriersystem. This paper summarizes the resultsof the SSPPO Hitchhikeron International Space Station(ISS)study. Includedare a number of"Hitchhikerlike"carrier system conceptsthat take advantage of the various ISS attached payload accommodation sites.Emphasis willbe givento a HI-Iconceptthatattachesto theJapaneseExperimentModule - Exposed Facility(JEM-EF). ISS HITCHHrKER STUDY OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Hitchhiker on ISS study were to examine the potential for using existing or modified Shuttle Hitchhiker flight and ground systems, facilities, personnel, and general low-cost, quick reaction approach to support smaller scientific payloads on Space Station. Any such implementation should avoid duplicating any already planned ISS capabilities and allow for easy transition of existing Shuttle Hitchhiker customers to ISS. EXISTING PLANNED SPACE STATION EXTERNAL PAYLOAD ACCOMMODATIONS Existing plans for Space Station external payload accommodations were examined in detail in order to determine the most promising possibilities for complementary use of Hitchhiker derived systems and implementation approach. The current plans are summarized as follows: The ISS has attachment latches (the Payload Attach System (PAS)) located on the main truss. Two are located on the nominal top (zenith - space facing) side of the starboard ($3) truss and a second pair are located on the bottom (nadir - earth facing) side. An additional set (upper and lower) of latches is located on the port side (P3) of the truss.
    [Show full text]
  • Capsulation Satellite Or Capsat
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20180002117 2019-08-31T16:28:09+00:00Z Capsulation Satellite or CapSat: A Low-Cost, Reliable, Rapid-Response Spacecraft Platform Joe Burt NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 8800 Greenbelt Rd Greenbelt, MD 20771 301-286-2217 [email protected] David Steinfeld NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 8800 Greenbelt Rd Greenbelt, MD 20771 301-286-0565 [email protected] March 6, 2017 Problem Statement • The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard’s Rideshare Office estimates that between 2013 and 2022, NASA launches of primary satellites will have left unused more than 20,371 kilograms of excess capacity. 2 Goddard Rideshare Office NASA Standard ESPA: 6 each 15” dia ports 180 kg/port 24”x24”x38” ESPA Grande : 4 each 24” dia ports 318 kg/port 42”x46”x56” Historical Rideshare Data CapSat Solution • Capsulation Satellite or CapSat is a low cost, 3 axis stabilized, modularized and standardized spacecraft, based on a pressurized volume with active thermal control allowing ruggedized COTS hardware to be flown reliably in space. • CapSat takes advantage of unused launch vehicle mass to orbit capabilities via the USAF Ride Share program; being specifically designed to mate to an ESPA Grande Ring. • Capacity goes unused in large part do to cost. Typical CubeSat’s are still nearly $1M/kg. A single CapSat can provide over 300kg of on-orbit mass at a cost 20 times cheaper; ~$50K/kg. • CapSat achieves this by leveraging proven SmallSat and CubeSat hardware combined with decades of GSFC software heritage in the cFS-Core Flight System and ITOS-Integrated Test & Operations System.
    [Show full text]
  • Sts-63 Press Kit February 1995
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION SPACE SHUTTLE MISSION STS-63 PRESS KIT FEBRUARY 1995 SHUTTLE-MIR RENDEZVOUS SPACEHAB-3; SPARTAN-204 STS-63 INSIGNIA STS063-S-001 -- Designed by the crewmembers, the STS-63 insignia depicts the orbiter maneuvering to rendezvous with Russia's Space Station Mir. The name is printed in Cyrillic on the side of the station. Visible in the Orbiter's payload bay are the commercial space laboratory Spacehab and the Shuttle Pointed Autonomous Research Tool for Astronomy (SPARTAN) satellite which are major payloads on the flight. The six points on the rising sun and the three stars are symbolic of the mission's Space Transportation System (STS) numerical designation. Flags of the United States and Russia at the bottom of the insignia symbolize the cooperative operations of this mission. The NASA insignia design for space shuttle flights is reserved for use by the astronauts and for other official use as the NASA Administrator may authorize. Public availability has been approved only in the form of illustrations by the various news media. When and if there is any change in this policy, which we do not anticipate, it will be publicly announced. PHOTO CREDIT: NASA or National Aeronautics and Space Administration. PUBLIC AFFAIRS CONTACTS For Information on the Space Shuttle Ed Campion Policy/Management 202/358-1778 NASA Headquarters Washington, DC Rob Navias Mission Operations 713/483-5111 Johnson Space Center Astronauts Houston, TX Bruce Buckingham Launch Processing 407/867-2468 Kennedy Space Center, Fl
    [Show full text]
  • Infared Spectral Measurement of Space Shuttle Glow
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Dissertations 1992 Infared Spectral Measurement of Space Shuttle Glow Mark Ahmadjian University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss Recommended Citation Ahmadjian, Mark, "Infared Spectral Measurement of Space Shuttle Glow" (1992). Open Access Dissertations. Paper 517. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss/517 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFRARED SPECTRAL MEASUREMENT OF SPACE SHUTTLE GLOW BY · MARK AHMADJIAN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN CHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 1992 ABSTRACT Infrared spectral measurements of the space shuttle glow were successfully conducted during the STS-39 space shuttle mission. Analysis indicates that NO, No+, OH, and co are among the molecules associated with the infrared glow phenomenon. During orbiter thruster firings the glow intensities in the infrared are enhanced by factors of lOx to lOOx with significant changes in spectral distribution. These measurements were obtained with the Qpacecraft Kinetic InfraKed Test (SKIRT) payload which included a cryogenic infrared circular variable filter (CVF) spectrometer (0.6 µm to 5.4 µm) and a number of infrared, visible, and ultraviolet radiometers (0.2 µm to 5.4 µm and 9.9 µm to 10.4 µm). In addition, glow measurements were unsuccessfully attempted with the ~ryogenic InfraKed Radiance Instrumentation for Qhuttle (CIRRIS-lA) with its 2.5 µm to 25 µm Fourier transform interferometer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Department of Defense Space Test Program
    - The Department of Defense Space Test Program Capt Stewart Cobb Space Test and Transportation Programs Office HQ Space Systems Division, Los Angeles AFB, CA Abstract For over twenty-five years, the Department of Defense Space Test Program has provided spaceflights for DOD experiment payloads, using almost every kind of booster and satellite in service during that period. This paper discusses briefly the mission and history of STP. The diversity of STP projects is illustrated by descriptions of several current projects. Finally, STP's future plans are discussed. The Department of Defense (DOD) Space Test Program (STP) provides spaceflight opportunities for DOD research experiments and agencies that are not authorized their own means of spaceflight. STP is a tri-service program under the executive management - of the Air Force, and has been in existence for over twenty-five years. In 1965, the Director of Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E) authorized the extablishment of the Space Experiment Support Program (SESP), which was to be tri-service in nature. The Air Force was designated the executive agency and a Program Office was established at Space Division. Originally chartered to support advanced development and engineering development payloads, SESP's scope was increased in 1968 to include basic research and exploratory development payloads. SESP became the Space Test Program in 1971, when the name was changed to reflect the expanded mission. The first SESP mission, known as P67-1, was launched from Vandenberg AFB, CA, on 29 June 1967. A Thor/Burner II rocket carried two experiments, one Army and one Navy, into a 2100 nm orbit.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA and Public Engagement After Apollo
    Sharing the Shuttle with America: NASA and Public Engagement after Apollo Amy Paige Kaminski Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Science and Technology in Society Sonja D. Schmid, Chair Barbara L. Allen Gary L. Downey Richard F. Hirsh Roger D. Launius March 6, 2015 Falls Church, Virginia Keywords: NASA, Space Shuttle, human space flight, public engagement, sociotechnical imaginaries, democratization, public participation Copyright 2015, Amy Paige Kaminski Sharing the Shuttle with America: NASA and Public Engagement after Apollo Amy Paige Kaminski Abstract Historical accounts depict NASA’s interactions with American citizens beyond government agencies and aerospace firms since the 1950s and 1960s as efforts to “sell” its human space flight initiatives and to position external publics as would-be observers, consumers, and supporters of such activities. Characterizing citizens solely as celebrants of NASA’s successes, however, masks the myriad publics, engagement modes, and influences that comprised NASA’s efforts to forge connections between human space flight and citizens after Apollo 11 culminated. While corroborating the premise that NASA constantly seeks public and political approval for its costly human space programs, I argue that maintaining legitimacy in light of shifting social attitudes, political priorities, and divided interest in space flight required NASA to reconsider how to serve and engage external publics vis-à-vis its next major human space program, the Space Shuttle. Adopting a sociotechnical imaginary featuring the Shuttle as a versatile technology that promised something for everyone, NASA sought to engage citizens with the Shuttle in ways appealing to their varied, expressed interests and became dependent on some publics’ direct involvement to render the vehicle viable economically, socially, and politically.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 by the Non-Military Viking Rocket
    The international trade in launch services : the effects of U.S. laws, policies and practices on its development Fenema, H.P. van Citation Fenema, H. P. van. (1999, September 30). The international trade in launch services : the effects of U.S. laws, policies and practices on its development. H.P. van Fenema, Leiden. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/44957 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the License: Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/44957 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/44957 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Fenema, H.P. van Title: The international trade in launch services : the effects of U.S. laws, policies and practices on its development Issue Date: 1999-09-30 CHAPTER2 United States law, policies and practices 2.1 The emergence of the US private launch industry 2.1.1 Law, policies and practices in the pre-space shuttle era (1961-1982) 2.1.1.1 Launch vehicle development in the 1960s: DOD, NASA and the private manufacturers President Eisenhower's military experience in World War II and his perception of the intentions of the Soviet Union in the post-war period made him a firm supporter of the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM's) which could act as a deterrent to nuclear attack through its promise to deliver warheads to targets thousands of miles away. He also supported the development of reconnaissance satellites which would make the U.
    [Show full text]
  • 1995 (669Kb Pdf)
    January 13, 1995 KSC Release No. 1-95 Note to Editors/News Directors: TCDT MEDIA OPPORTUNITIES WITH STS-63 CREW SET FOR NEXT WEEK News media representatives will have an opportunity to speak informally with and photograph the crew of Space Shuttle mission STS-63 next week during the Terminal Countdown Demonstration Test (TCDT) at Kennedy Space Center. The six-member crew is scheduled to arrive at KSC Tuesday, Jan. 17, at 9:30 a.m. Media interested in viewing the arrival should be at the KSC Press Site parking lot (near the base of the stairs that lead to the dome) by 8:30 a.m. for transport to the Shuttle Landing Facility. On Wednesday, the STS-63 crew will be available for an informal question and answer session at Pad 39B. News media should be at the KSC Press Site parking lot by 12 noon for transport to the pad. On Thursday, the crew will depart their quarters for the pad at 7:45 a.m. Photographers who desire to cover the crew walkout should be at the KSC press site parking lot at 6:45 a.m. for transport to the Operations and Checkout Building. The crew will board the Shuttle Discovery at about 8:15 a.m. Thursday and remain there through the end of the test. The mock countdown culminates with a simulated main engine cutoff at about 11 a.m. Thursday Media interested in covering these events should contact the KSC Press Site to obtain the proper badge. Following TCDT, the crew is scheduled to depart KSC for their homes in Houston for final flight preparations.
    [Show full text]
  • F I N a L V O Y a G E the Last Flight of Nasa's First Space
    COLUMBIA FINAL VOYAGE THE LAST FLIGHT OF NASA’S FIRST SPACE SHUTTLE PHILIP CHIEN COPERNICUS BOOKS An Imprint of Springer Science+Business Media in Association with PRAXIS PUBLISHING, LTD. © 2006 Praxis Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy- ing, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. All photos are courtesy of NASA and the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) unless otherwise noted. Published in the United States by Copernicus Books, an imprint of Springer Science+Business Media. Copernicus Books Springer Science+Business Media 233 Spring Street New York, NY 10013 www.springer.com Additional information is available at the author’s website—http://www.sts107.info Library of Congress Control Number: 2005932843 Manufactured in the United States of America. Printed on acid-free paper. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ISBN-10: 0-387-27148-1 e-ISBN 0-387-27149-X ISBN-13: 978-0387-27148-4 FOREWORD JONATHAN B.CLARK Columbia—Final Voyage is the most comprehensive book about the final mission of Columbia STS-107 to date. I have known the author, Phil Chien, since I started working shuttle missions as a flight surgeon in 1998. He was always there asking the shuttle crew questions when they were at the Cape for their Terminal Count Down Tests and press conferences just prior to launch. I was always impressed with his very insightful questions and deep grasp of technical issues.
    [Show full text]
  • HITCHIKER MISSION OPERATIONS Past, Present and Future Kathryn Anderson Omitron, Inc
    HITCHIKER MISSION OPERATIONS Past, Present and Future Kathryn Anderson Omitron, Inc. 6411 Ivy Lane, Suite 600 Greenbelt, Maryland 20770 (301) 474-1 700 Contributors: Agustin J. Alfonzo, Georgeann Brophy, Victor Gehr, Brian Murphy, Francis Wasiak ABSTRACT; What is mission operations? Mission operations is an iterative process aimed at achieving the greatest possible mission success with the resources available. The process involves understanding of the science objectives, investigation of which system capabilities can best meet these objectives, integration of the objectives and resources into a cohesive mission operations plan, evaluation of the plan through simulations, and implementation of the plan in real-time. In this paper, the authors present a comprehensive description of what the Hitchhiker mission operations approach is and why it is crucial to mission success. The authors describe the significance of operational considerations from the beginning and throughout the experiment ground and fright systems development. The authors also address the necessity of training and simulations. Finally, the authors cite several examples illustrating the benefits of understanding and utilizing the mission operations process. INTRODUCTION mission operations plan through an interactive dialogue between Hitchhiker, Orbiter, and experiment personnel. The The mission operations process starts at the earliest stages of resulting operations plan prepares and guides the Hitchhiker Hitchhiker Project and customer interaction and culminates Flight Operations Team (FOT), consisting of both in on-orbit operations. Experience has proven that an operations personnel and experiment teams, through both attention to operations is integral to the development and nominal and contingency flight situations. ultimate success of a Hitchhiker Payload. MISSION OPERATIONS PLANNING Ideally, payload operations activity begins even before an experiment is manifested as a shuttle payload.
    [Show full text]
  • Air and Space Power Journal, Published Quarterly, Is the Professional Flagship Publication of the United States Air Force
    Air Force Chief of Staff Gen John P. Jumper Commander, Air Education and Training Command Gen Donald G. Cook http://www.af.mil Commander, Air University Lt Gen Donald A. Lamontagne Commander, College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education Col Bobby J. Wilkes Editor Col Anthony C. Cain http://www.aetc.randolph.af.mil Senior Editor Lt Col Malcolm D. Grimes Associate Editors Lt Col Michael J. Masterson Maj Donald R. Ferguson Professional Staff Marvin W. Bassett, Contributing Editor Larry Carter, Contributing Editor http://www.au.af.mil Mary J. Moore, Editorial Assistant Steven C. Garst, Director of Art and Production Daniel M. Armstrong, Illustrator L. Susan Fair, Illustrator Ann Bailey, Prepress Production Manager Air and Space Power Chronicles Luetwinder T. Eaves, Managing Editor The Air and Space Power Journal, published quarterly, http://www.cadre.maxwell.af.mil is the professional flagship publication of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open forum for the presentation and stimulation of innova­ tive thinking on military doctrine, strategy, tactics, force structure, readiness, and other matters of na­ tional defense. The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanc­ tion of the Department of Defense, the Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. Articles in this edition may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If they are reproduced, Visit Air and Space Power Jour nal on-line the Air and Space Power Journal requests a courtesy line.
    [Show full text]