Russian Regions and the Adoption Agencies Who Place

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Russian Regions and the Adoption Agencies Who Place Page 1 of 33 Site Map Russian Region and Agency Cross Reference Translate this Site Sorted By REGION español italiano français norsk русско deutsch Search A-Z Index See Sorted by Agency - See Agencies and Russian Permit Status - includes Agency nederlands 한국어 more website links Home Family Stories Organizations & Statistics Government & Medical Adoption Parenting Adoption & Cultural Items Funding & Benefits Country Information Index to Groups & Lists Regional Groups & Lists Post Adoption Paperwork Inspiration Orphanage Addresses Birth Family - Birth Siblings Adult Adoptee Stories & Info Contact About Request Info Site Map Credit for much of this information goes to Mary, who started this list years ago, Candace2006 and other members of FRUA Chat, Moderators and Members of Regional Yahoo groups, EEAC Lists, and many helpful Agencies. This information is believed to be accurate, however, please do independent research before signing with an agency. One place for research ideas is here. I list all the agencies with Russian programs that I am aware of. Inclusion on this list is not an endorsement. Agencies frequently change the regions they work in. Region changes is not a bad thing, there are many, very good reasons why an agency may choose to change the regions from which they place children. Agency owners/employees/adoptive parents/adopted people - Please do send corrections and additions via my contact page. Gray Font and * indicate the agency/entities placed children from that region in the past (as long ago as 1992), but may not be currently working in that region. I track former regions to enable families worldwide to reunite siblings (and orphanage friends) adopted separately. City names in parenthesis are for reference, but do not mean the agency works/worked in that specific city, just that Region. I use the term "Region" to refer to the 83 Federal subjects (political subdivisions) that exist in Russia. Sorted by Region As of 2-Sept-2010 Region names starting with: A B C/Ch D E F G I J Ka Ke - Ki Ko - Ky L M N O Pa - Pe Pr - Ps R Sa - So St - Sy Ta - Ts Tu - Ty U V Y Z The Unknowns (Please help) Regions with no agencies Russian Permit or Hague Region * Agency State Country NGO Accredited Abakan ~ see Khakasia, Republic of Achinsk ~ see Krasnoyarsk Krai Adygeya, Republic of (Maykop) International Family Services (IFS) (affiliated with?) TX USA No Hague Acc Adygeya, Republic of (Maykop) Small World Adoption Foundation of Missouri MO USA Permit Hague Acc Adygeya, Republic of (Maykop) * Children's Home Society & Family Services (CHSFS) MN USA Permit Hague Acc Adygeya, Republic of (Maykop) * International Family Services (IFS), (Amrex affiliated) TX USA No Hague Acc Afipsky ~ see Krasnodar Krai Aginsk-Buryat AO ~ see Zabaykalsky Krai Aginskoye ~ see Zabaykalsky Krai Aleksin ~ see Tula Oblast Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) * ABC Adoption Services, Inc / Carolina Adoption (CAS) VA/NC USA Permit Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) * Creative Adoptions, Inc MD USA Permit Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) * European Adoption Consultants (EAC) OH USA Permit Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) * Hands Across the Water, (affiliated with ?) MI USA No Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) * Maine Adoption Placement Services (MAPS) ME USA Permit Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) * World Association for Children and Parents (WACAP) WA USA Permit Susp Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) * Not in Russia: Cradle Society (The Cradle) IL USA~ No Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) * Out of Bus: Adoption Resource Center (ARC) MD USA~ Out of Bus Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) Medecins du Monde (MDM) France NGO Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) Centro Internazionale per l'Infanzia e la Famiglia (CIFA) Italy Permit Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) SOS Bambino International Adoption Italy Permit Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) * Out of Bus: Associazione CHIARA Italy~ Out of Bus Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) ASEFA Spain Permit Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) Association of Navarra Nuevo Futuro Spain Permit Hague Acc Altai Krai (Barnual, Biysk) Creixer Junts Spain Permit Hague Acc Altay, Republic of (Gorno-Altaysk) * Hands Across the Water, (affiliated with ?) MI USA No Hague Acc Altay, Republic of (Gorno-Altaysk) * Not in Russia: Lutheran Social Service of the South (LSSS) TX USA~ Not in Russia Hague Acc Altay, Republic of (Gorno-Altaysk) * Out of Bus: United Advocates for Families FL USA~ Out of Bus Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * -unknown US independent USA ~ ~ Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Beacon House Adoption Services (BHAS) FL USA Permit applied Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Building Blocks, (Amrex affiliated) OH USA No denied Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Cherished Children International (CCIAA) (Amrex affiliated) SC USA No No Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Children of the World, (Amrex affiliated) Fairhope AL USANo No Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Little Miracles TX USA NGO Hague Acc http://www.karensadoptionlinks.com/russiaregionagencyR.html 9/3/2010 Page 2 of 33 Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Not in Russia: Adoption Alliance (Amrex affiliated) CO USA~ Not in Russia Hague Acc Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Not in Russia: Children's House International WA USA~ Not in Russia Hague Acc Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Not in Russia: International Adoption Services, (Amrex aff), Edina MN USA~ Not in Russia Hague Acc Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Not in Russia: Tree of Life Adoptions (Amrex affiliated) OR USA~ Not in Russia Hague Acc Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Out of Bus: A Child's Hope (ACHI) (David Bentley) (Amrex aff) NJ USA~ Out of Bus Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Out of Bus: Adoption Blessings Worldwide/Tedi Bear (Amrex aff) FL USA~ Out of Bus denied Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Out of Bus: Adoptions Abroad TX USA~Out of Bus Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Out of Bus: Genesis Adoptions, Inc (Amrex) GA USA~ Out of Bus applied Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Out of Bus: Heritage Adoption Services OR USA~ Out of Bus Hague Acc Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Out of Bus: Southern Adoptions MS USA~ Out of Bus Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Out of Bus: Family for You (Amrex affiliated) Austria~ Out of Bus Hague Acc Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) Global Adoption Germany – Help for Kids (GAG) Germany NGO Hague Acc Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) Zukunft für Kinder (ZfK) Germany Permit Hague Acc Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Out of Bus: International Child's Care Org (ICCO) (Amrex aff) Germany~ Out of Bus ~ Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Executive Consulting Services, LLC (Oleg Oleynikov) RU Ireland ~ n/a Amur Oblast (Blagoveschensk) * Executive Consulting Services, LLC (Oleg Oleynikov) RU UK ~ ~ Amursk ~ see Khabarovsk Anadyr ~ see Chukotka AO Anapa ~ see Krasnodar Krai Anzhero-Sudzhensk ~ see Kemerovo Obl Apatity ~ see Murmansk Oblast Arkhangelsk Oblast Adoption Associates, Inc (AAI) MI USA Permit Hague Acc Arkhangelsk Oblast Buckner Adoption and Maternity Services TX USA Permit Hague Acc Arkhangelsk Oblast Cradle of Hope Adoption Center (COH or CHAC) MD/VA USA No Hague Acc Arkhangelsk Oblast Spirit of Faith Adoptions (AAI affiliated) OH USA No No Arkhangelsk Oblast * Christian World Adoptions (CWA) NC USA Permit Hague Acc Arkhangelsk Oblast * Not in Russia: Adoption Services Associates (Orson Mozes) TX USA~ Not in Russia No Arkhangelsk Oblast * Out of Bus: Genesis Adoptions, Inc (Amrex) GA USA~ Out of Bus applied Arkhangelsk Oblast * Out of Bus: Hope for Children (Adoption Associates affiliated) GA USA~ Out of Bus expired Arkhangelsk Oblast * Out of Bus: New Hope Child and Family Agency WA USA~ Out of Bus Arkhangelsk Oblast Zukunft für Kinder (ZfK) Germany Permit Hague Acc Arkhangelsk Oblast * -unknown NZ agency and/or independent NZ ~ ~ Arkhangelsk Oblast * AIPAME Spain Permit Hague Acc Arkhangelsk Oblast * Cradle of Hope Adoption Center (COH or CHAC) USA UK ~ ~ Armavir ~ see Krasnodar Krai Artyom ~ see Primorsky Krai Astrakhan Oblast Adopt International (Alliance for Children aff) CA USA No Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast Alliance For Children MA USA Permit Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast European Adoption Consultants (EAC) OH USA Permit Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast * Children's Hope International (CHI) MO USA Permit Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast * Partners for Adoption (Adoptions & Aid Intrnl) (Creative aff) CA USA NGO Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast * Not in Russia: Children's House International WA USA~ Not in Russia Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast * Not in Russia: Cradle Society (The Cradle) IL USA~ No Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast * Not in Russia: Journeys of the Heart (Amrex affiliated) OR USA~ Not in Russia Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast * Not in Russia: Lutheran Social Service of the South (LSSS) TX USA~ Not in Russia Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast * Not in Russia: Tree of Life Adoptions (Amrex affiliated) OR USA~ Not in Russia Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast * Out of Bus: Adoption Placement API (Amrex affiliated) FL USA~ Out of Bus Astrakhan Oblast * Out of Bus: Bless This Child, Inc OK USA~ Out of Bus applied Astrakhan Oblast * Out of Bus: Genesis Adoptions, Inc (Amrex) GA USA~ Out of Bus applied Astrakhan Oblast * Out of Bus: Universal Family Services, Mill Valley, CA USA~ Out of Bus Astrakhan Oblast Enfance Avenir France Permit Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast Medecins du Monde (MDM) France NGO Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast * -unknown French agency and/or independent France ~ ~ Astrakhan Oblast Global Adoption Germany – Help for Kids (GAG) Germany NGO Hague Acc Astrakhan Oblast * Executive Consulting Services, LLC (Oleg Oleynikov)
Recommended publications
  • Committee of Ministers Secretariat Du Comite Des Ministres
    SECRETARIAT GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRETARIAT DU COMITE DES MINISTRES Contact: Clare Ovey Tel: 03 88 41 36 45 Date: 06/06/2017 DH-DD(2017)611 Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. Meeting: 1288th meeting (June 2017) (DH) Communication from the applicant’s representatives (01/06/2017) in the case of JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. Russian Federation (Application No. 302/02) Information made available under Rule 9.1 of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements. * * * * * * * * * * * Les documents distribués à la demande d’un/e Représentant/e le sont sous la seule responsabilité dudit/de ladite Représentant/e, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Réunion : 1288e réunion (juin 2017) (DH) Communication des représentants du requérant (01/06/2017) dans l’affaire JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW ET AUTRES c. Fédération de Russie (Requête n° 302/02) [anglais uniquement] Informations mises à disposition en vertu de la Règle 9.1 des Règles du Comité des Ministres pour la surveillance de l’exécution des arrêts et des termes des règlements amiables. PO Box 40 13893 Highway 7 (courier) Georgetown ON L7G 4T1 905-873-4545 905-873-4522 John M. Burns, LL.B. DGI [email protected] Also of the Bar of British Columbia 01 JUIN 2017 SERVICE DE L’EXECUTION DES ARRETS DE LA CEDH 30 May 2017 Department for the Execution of Judgments of the ECHR DGI - Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe F-67075 STRASBOURG CEDEX FRANCE Re: Application no.
    [Show full text]
  • SDN Changes 2014
    OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL CHANGES TO THE Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List SINCE JANUARY 1, 2014 This publication of Treasury's Office of Foreign AL TOKHI, Qari Saifullah (a.k.a. SAHAB, Qari; IN TUNISIA; a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARIA IN Assets Control ("OFAC") is designed as a a.k.a. SAIFULLAH, Qari), Quetta, Pakistan; DOB TUNISIA; a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARI'AH; a.k.a. reference tool providing actual notice of actions by 1964; alt. DOB 1963 to 1965; POB Daraz ANSAR AL-SHARI'AH IN TUNISIA; a.k.a. OFAC with respect to Specially Designated Jaldak, Qalat District, Zabul Province, "SUPPORTERS OF ISLAMIC LAW"), Tunisia Nationals and other entities whose property is Afghanistan; citizen Afghanistan (individual) [FTO] [SDGT]. blocked, to assist the public in complying with the [SDGT]. AL-RAYA ESTABLISHMENT FOR MEDIA various sanctions programs administered by SAHAB, Qari (a.k.a. AL TOKHI, Qari Saifullah; PRODUCTION (a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARIA; OFAC. The latest changes may appear here prior a.k.a. SAIFULLAH, Qari), Quetta, Pakistan; DOB a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARI'A BRIGADE; a.k.a. to their publication in the Federal Register, and it 1964; alt. DOB 1963 to 1965; POB Daraz ANSAR AL-SHARI'A IN BENGHAZI; a.k.a. is intended that users rely on changes indicated in Jaldak, Qalat District, Zabul Province, ANSAR AL-SHARIA IN LIBYA; a.k.a. ANSAR this document that post-date the most recent Afghanistan; citizen Afghanistan (individual) AL-SHARIAH; a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARIAH Federal Register publication with respect to a [SDGT].
    [Show full text]
  • FSC National Risk Assessment
    FSC National Risk Assessment for the Russian Federation DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0 Version V1-0 Code FSC-NRA-RU National approval National decision body: Coordination Council, Association NRG Date: 04 June 2018 International approval FSC International Center, Performance and Standards Unit Date: 11 December 2018 International contact Name: Tatiana Diukova E-mail address: [email protected] Period of validity Date of approval: 11 December 2018 Valid until: (date of approval + 5 years) Body responsible for NRA FSC Russia, [email protected], [email protected] maintenance FSC-NRA-RU V1-0 NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 2018 – 1 of 78 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for the Russian Federation ................................................. 3 1 Background information ........................................................................................................... 4 2 List of experts involved in risk assessment and their contact details ........................................ 6 3 National risk assessment maintenance .................................................................................... 7 4 Complaints and disputes regarding the approved National Risk Assessment ........................... 7 5 List of key stakeholders for consultation ................................................................................... 8 6 List of abbreviations and Russian transliterated terms* used ................................................... 8 7 Risk assessments
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Greek Culture Representation in Socio-Economic Development of the Southern Regions of Russia
    European Research Studies Journal Volume XXI, Special Issue 1, 2018 pp. 136 - 147 The Role of Greek Culture Representation in Socio-Economic Development of the Southern Regions of Russia T.V. Evsyukova1, I.G. Barabanova2, O.V. Glukhova3, E.A. Cherednikova4 Abstract: This article researches how the Greek lingvoculture represented in onomasticon of the South of Russia. The South Russian anthroponyms, toponyms and pragmatonyms are considered in this article and how they verbalize the most important values and ideological views. It is proved in the article that the key concepts of the Greek lingvoculture such as: “Peace”, “Faith”, “Love”, “Heroism”, “Knowledge”, “Alphabet”, “Power”, “Charismatic person” and “Craft” are highly concentrated in the onomastic lexis of the researched region. The mentioned above concepts due to their specific pragmatic orientation are represented at different extend. Keywords: Culture, linguoculture, onomastics, concept anthroponym, toponym, pragmatonim. 1D.Sc. in Linguistics, Professor, Department of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Rostov State University of Economics, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation. 2Ph.D. in Linguistics, Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Rostov State University of Economics, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation. 3Lecturer, Department of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Rostov State University of Economics, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, E-mail: [email protected] 4Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Rostov State University of Economics, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation. T.V. Evsyukova, I.G. Barabanova, O.V. Glukhova, E.A. Cherednikova 137 1. Introduction There is unlikely to be any other culture that influenced so much on the formation of other European cultures, as the Greek culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources and Pathways 4.1
    Chapter 4 Persistant toxic substances (PTS) sources and pathways 4.1. Introduction Chapter 4 4.1. Introduction 4.2. Assessment of distant sources: In general, the human environment is a combination Longrange atmospheric transport of the physical, chemical, biological, social and cultur- Due to the nature of atmospheric circulation, emission al factors that affect human health. It should be recog- sources located within the Northern Hemisphere, par- nized that exposure of humans to PTS can, to certain ticularly those in Europe and Asia, play a dominant extent, be dependant on each of these factors. The pre- role in the contamination of the Arctic. Given the spa- cise role differs depending on the contaminant con- tial distribution of PTS emission sources, and their cerned, however, with respect to human intake, the potential for ‘global’ transport, evaluation of long- chain consisting of ‘source – pathway – biological avail- range atmospheric transport of PTS to the Arctic ability’ applies to all contaminants. Leaving aside the region necessarily involves modeling on the hemi- biological aspect of the problem, this chapter focuses spheric/global scale using a multi-compartment on PTS sources, and their physical transport pathways. approach. To meet these requirements, appropriate modeling tools have been developed. Contaminant sources can be provisionally separated into three categories: Extensive efforts were made in the collection and • Distant sources: Located far from receptor sites in preparation of input data for modeling. This included the Arctic. Contaminants can reach receptor areas the required meteorological and geophysical informa- via air currents, riverine flow, and ocean currents. tion, and data on the physical and chemical properties During their transport, contaminants are affected by of both the selected substances and of their emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleuts: an Outline of the Ethnic History
    i Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Roza G. Lyapunova Translated by Richard L. Bland ii As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has re- sponsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Shared Beringian Heritage Program at the National Park Service is an international program that rec- ognizes and celebrates the natural resources and cultural heritage shared by the United States and Russia on both sides of the Bering Strait. The program seeks local, national, and international participation in the preservation and understanding of natural resources and protected lands and works to sustain and protect the cultural traditions and subsistence lifestyle of the Native peoples of the Beringia region. Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Author: Roza G. Lyapunova English translation by Richard L. Bland 2017 ISBN-13: 978-0-9965837-1-8 This book’s publication and translations were funded by the National Park Service, Shared Beringian Heritage Program. The book is provided without charge by the National Park Service. To order additional copies, please contact the Shared Beringian Heritage Program ([email protected]). National Park Service Shared Beringian Heritage Program © The Russian text of Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History by Roza G. Lyapunova (Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka” leningradskoe otdelenie, 1987), was translated into English by Richard L.
    [Show full text]
  • Living in Two Places : Permanent Transiency In
    living in two places: permanent transiency in the magadan region Elena Khlinovskaya Rockhill Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER, UK; [email protected] abstract Some individuals in the Kolyma region of Northeast Russia describe their way of life as “permanently temporary.” This mode of living involves constant movements and the work of imagination while liv- ing between two places, the “island” of Kolyma and the materik, or mainland. In the Soviet era people maintained connections to the materik through visits, correspondence and telephone conversations. Today, living in the Kolyma means living in some distant future, constantly keeping the materik in mind, without fully inhabiting the Kolyma. People’s lives embody various mythologies that have been at work throughout Soviet Kolyma history. Some of these models are being transformed, while oth- ers persist. Underlying the opportunities afforded by high mobility, both government practices and individual plans reveal an ideal of permanency and rootedness. KEYWORDS: Siberia, gulag, Soviet Union, industrialism, migration, mobility, post-Soviet The Magadan oblast’1 has enjoyed only modest attention the mid-seventeenth century, the history of its prishloye in arctic anthropology. Located in northeast Russia, it be- naseleniye3 started in the 1920s when the Kolyma region longs to the Far Eastern Federal Okrug along with eight became known for gold mining and Stalinist forced-labor other regions, okrugs and krais. Among these, Magadan camps. oblast' is somewhat peculiar. First, although this territory These regional peculiarities—a small indigenous pop- has been inhabited by various Native groups for centu- ulation and a distinct industrial Soviet history—partly ries, compared to neighboring Chukotka and the Sakha account for the dearth of anthropological research con- Republic (Yakutia), the Magadan oblast' does not have a ducted in Magadan.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanning the Bering Strait
    National Park service shared beringian heritage Program U.s. Department of the interior Spanning the Bering Strait 20 years of collaborative research s U b s i s t e N c e h UN t e r i N c h UK o t K a , r U s s i a i N t r o DU c t i o N cean Arctic O N O R T H E L A Chu a e S T kchi Se n R A LASKA a SIBERIA er U C h v u B R i k R S otk S a e i a P v I A en r e m in i n USA r y s M l u l g o a a S K S ew la c ard Peninsu r k t e e r Riv n a n z uko i i Y e t R i v e r ering Sea la B u s n i CANADA n e P la u a ns k ni t Pe a ka N h las c A lf of Alaska m u a G K W E 0 250 500 Pacific Ocean miles S USA The Shared Beringian Heritage Program has been fortunate enough to have had a sustained source of funds to support 3 community based projects and research since its creation in 1991. Presidents George H.W. Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev expanded their cooperation in the field of environmental protection and the study of global change to create the Shared Beringian Heritage Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Persons Who Wish to Seek Asylum in the Russian Federation
    INFORMATION FOR PERSONS WHO WISH TO SEEK ASYLUM IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION “Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in the other countries asylum from persecution”. Article 14 Universal Declaration of Human Rights I. Who is a refugee? According to Article 1 of the Federal Law “On Refugees”, a refugee is: “a person who, owing to well‑founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of particular social group or politi‑ cal opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country”. If you consider yourself a refugee, you should apply for Refugee Status in the Russian Federation and obtain protection from the state. If you consider that you may not meet the refugee definition or you have already been rejected for refugee status, but, nevertheless you can not re‑ turn to your country of origin for humanitarian reasons, you have the right to submit an application for Temporary Asylum status, in accordance to the Article 12 of the Federal Law “On refugees”. Humanitarian reasons may con‑ stitute the following: being subjected to tortures, arbitrary deprivation of life and freedom, and access to emergency medical assistance in case of danger‑ ous disease / illness. II. Who is responsible for determining Refugee status? The responsibility for determining refugee status and providing le‑ gal protection as well as protection against forced return to the country of origin lies with the host state. Refugee status determination in the Russian Federation is conducted by the Federal Migration Service (FMS of Russia) through its territorial branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Countries and Their Capital Cities Cheat Sheet by Spaceduck (Spaceduck) Via Cheatography.Com/4/Cs/56
    Countries and their Capital Cities Cheat Sheet by SpaceDuck (SpaceDuck) via cheatography.com/4/cs/56/ Countries and their Captial Cities Countries and their Captial Cities (cont) Countries and their Captial Cities (cont) Afghani​ stan Kabul Canada Ottawa Federated States of Palikir Albania Tirana Cape Verde Praia Micronesia Algeria Algiers Cayman Islands George Fiji Suva American Samoa Pago Pago Town Finland Helsinki Andorra Andorra la Vella Central African Republic Bangui France Paris Angola Luanda Chad N'Djamena French Polynesia Papeete Anguilla The Valley Chile Santiago Gabon Libreville Antigua and Barbuda St. John's Christmas Island Flying Fish Gambia Banjul Cove Argentina Buenos Aires Georgia Tbilisi Cocos (Keeling) Islands West Island Armenia Yerevan Germany Berlin Colombia Bogotá Aruba Oranjestad Ghana Accra Comoros Moroni Australia Canberra Gibraltar Gibraltar Cook Islands Avarua Austria Vienna Greece Athens Costa Rica San José Azerbaijan Baku Greenland Nuuk Côte d'Ivoire Yamous‐​ Bahamas Nassau Grenada St. George's soukro Bahrain Manama Guam Hagåtña Croatia Zagreb Bangladesh Dhaka Guatemala Guatemala Cuba Havana City Barbados Bridgetown Cyprus Nicosia Guernsey St. Peter Port Belarus Minsk Czech Republic Prague Guinea Conakry Belgium Brussels Democratic Republic of the Kinshasa Guinea-​ Bissau Bissau Belize Belmopan Congo Guyana Georgetown Benin Porto-Novo Denmark Copenhagen Haiti Port-au​ -P‐​ Bermuda Hamilton Djibouti Djibouti rince Bhutan Thimphu Dominica Roseau Honduras Tegucig​ alpa Bolivia Sucre Dominican Republic Santo
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Framework of Russia. the 250 Largest Industrial Centers Of
    INDUSTRIAL FRAMEWORK OF RUSSIA 250 LARGEST INDUSTRIAL CENTERS OF RUSSIA Metodology of the Ranking. Data collection INDUSTRIAL FRAMEWORK OF RUSSIA The ranking is based on the municipal statistics published by the Federal State Statistics Service on the official website1. Basic indicator is Shipment of The 250 Largest Industrial Centers of own production goods, works performed and services rendered related to mining and manufacturing in 2010. The revenue in electricity, gas and water Russia production and supply was taken into account only regarding major power plants which belong to major generation companies of the wholesale electricity market. Therefore, the financial results of urban utilities and other About the Ranking public services are not taken into account in the industrial ranking. The aim of the ranking is to observe the most significant industrial centers in Spatial analysis regarding the allocation of business (productive) assets of the Russia which play the major role in the national economy and create the leading Russian and multinational companies2 was performed. Integrated basis for national welfare. Spatial allocation, sectorial and corporate rankings and company reports was analyzed. That is why with the help of the structure of the 250 Largest Industrial Centers determine “growing points” ranking one could follow relationship between welfare of a city and activities and “depression areas” on the map of Russia. The ranking allows evaluation of large enterprises. Regarding financial results of basic enterprises some of the role of primary production sector at the local level, comparison of the statistical data was adjusted, for example in case an enterprise is related to a importance of large enterprises and medium business in the structure of city but it is located outside of the city border.
    [Show full text]