Arch 150 Appreciation of Architecture 1 Fall 2017 • Prof

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Arch 150 Appreciation of Architecture 1 Fall 2017 • Prof. Alex Anderson Test 1 Study Guide (test available Thurs 10/12 at 6:00 pm until Sat 10/14 at 6:00 pm) The test is open book. You may use any resource you like, as long as you work on your own. It is 30 questions, 40 minutes. Lectures Covered: 9/28 Course overview 10/3 Construction 1: mud, wood, and stone 10/5 Prehistory 1: the architecture of nomadic and early agrarian societies 10/10 Prehistory 2: megalithic architecture Readings in the text: Pages 1-14, 251-258, 274-282 Places: Prehistory 1 Prehistory 2: Cave, Lascaux, France Temple, Ggantija, Malta Mammoth bone hut, Ukraine Stone Alignments, Carnac, France Tipis, American Plains Silbury Hill, Wiltshire, England Bedouin Tent, Syria Stonehenge, Wiltshire, England Jomon buildings, Japan Woodhenge, Wiltshire, England Haida houses, British Columbia, Canada Avebury, Wiltshire, England Çatal Hüyük, Turkey Stanton Drew, Stanton Drew, England Mesa Verde, Colorado, USA Newgrange, Ireland Terms: ashlar lintel stacking barrow masonry tenon beam megalith tent column menhir thatch corbel mortise tipi dolmen passage grave totem pole framing pit house trilithon granary plank house tumulus henge post wattle and daub joist rubble weaving In the lecture on construction I talked about Gottfried Semper’s ideas concerning “the four elements of architecture” which include: • Ordered space — the platform • Sheltered space — the roof • Shared space — the hearth • Ornament — the wall You should understand how these elements work in the hut he used as an example—both practically and symbolically. You should also understand and how these elements apply to architecture more generally. In addition to the information above we have talked about how factors such as gravity, earthquakes, weather, geography, climate, food sources, agricultural practices, vulnerability to enemies, religious practices, trade, availability of materials, and local construction techniques affected dwellings and religious structures. You should have a basic understanding of these relationships. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Magazine Summer 2011 Plan Your Walk
magazine summer 2011 magazine summer 2011 Southern England Southern England 09 Land’s End Peninsula, Cornwall 10 Avebury, Wiltshire 12/05/2011 16:30 l Distance 22½km/14 miles l Time 7hrs l Type Coast l Distance 18km/11 miles l Time 6½hrs l Type Countryside NAVIGATION FITNESS NAVIGATION FITNESS 1 LEVEL 1 2/3 LEVEL 2/3 2 LEVEL 2 2 LEVEL 2 feature p61 Plan your walk Plan your walk SEE Newquay l Cheltenham Redruth Gloucester Oxford St Ives l l CORNWALL Swindon l Penzance P Bristol Reading Falmouth N l TRO L Bath AVEBURY ORGA AR LAND’S END B A PENINSULA N EVE M O Landewednack T Salisbury HY: S HY: HY: FI HY: P P WHERE: Linear walk from WHERE: Circular walk from Gurnard’s Head to Sennen To find great accommodation, visit Avebury, Wiltshire. Cove via Cape Cornwall. www.ramblers.org.uk/accommodation START/END: The Red Lion, PHOTOGRA PHOTOGRA START: Gurnard’s Head Avebury (SU103699). (SW436376). Of all Cornwall’s wonderful sides of the peninsula, taking in TERRAIN: Unmarked but Taking in the first section of the cloak optional). At the end of END: Sennen Cove coastline, stretches of the north rugged cliffs, mining relics, splendid straightforward footpaths Great Stones Way, this ‘taster’ the field, cross two stiles and (SW355263). coast and the Land’s End headlands and beautiful coves. over open, chalky farmland route starts and ends inside continue beside the road, TERRAIN: Rugged coastal Peninsula must share first prize with plenty of historic the prehistoric stone circle at keeping to the L of the field.
[Show full text]
LILY COX-RICHARD Sculptures the Size of Hailstones 17 February - 12 May 2018
LCR: In this show, I’m using found objects and sculptures I’ve made and The 2018 Cell Series is generously supported by trying to put them in positions where they can slip between multiple McGinnis Family Fund of Communities Foundation of Texas systems. In addition to lightning rods and scrap copper, I’m working on with additional funding from new sculptures that could ﬁt in your hand. The “hail scale” is used to Susie and Joe Clack measure the size of hailstones by comparing them to common objects like Gene and Marsha Gray a walnut, golf ball, or teacup: hailstones the size of ____. Your earlier Amy and Patrick Kelly questions about context are really important here—what might be enor- mous for a hailstone might be a very modest size for a sculpture. Talking Sally and Robert Porter about the weather is often considered banal, but lately, the weather has been urgently claiming a lot more space for discussion. What happens when we ignore an important conversation or dismiss small talk (or small Past Cell Series artists: sculptures)? I’m interested in zooming in on details and giving them a lot DENNY PICKETT - 2008 | JEFFREY BROSK - 2009 | RANDY BACON - 2009 of space and attention. JOHN FROST - 2009 | NANCY LAMB - 2010 | JOHN ROBERT CRAFT - 2010 TERRI THORNTON - 2010 | ANNE ALLEN - 2011 | WILL HENRY - 2011 The sculptures the size of hailstones will sit on a large plaster plinth that ERIC ZIMMERMAN - 2011 | BILL DAVENPORT - 2012 | JUSTIN BOYD - 2012 has woven basket forms embedded in it, forming niches and craters. Often CAROL BENSON - 2012 | KANA HARADA - 2013 | BRAD TUCKER - 2013 pedestals and plinths are made to blend into their surroundings; but of ANTHONY SONNENBERG - 2013 | CHRIS SAUTER - 2014 course, they can never disappear.
[Show full text]
Section II: Summary of the Periodic Report on the State of Conservation
State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties in Europe SECTION II thus defined on the basis of criteria I and III and UNITED KINGDOM ultimately criterion II. In this connection ICOMOS would like to recall that already in the 12th century Stonehenge, Avebury and Stonehenge was considered as one of the wonders of the world by the chroniclers Henry de Huntington Associated Sites and Geoffrey de Monmouth and that in the 17th century, Stonehenge was the focus of a study by Brief description the great architect Inigo Jones. Stonehenge and Avebury, in Wiltshire, are among The early and unwavering interest for this the most famous groups of megaliths in the world. megalithic ensemble which serves as a benchmark, The two sanctuaries consist of circles of menhirs has left its mark upon historiography, the evolution arranged in a pattern whose astronomical of architectural theories and the progress of significance is still being explored. These holy prehistoric sciences. places and the nearby Neolithic sites are an incomparable testimony to prehistoric times. Committee Decision Bureau (1986): The Bureau requested the United 1. Introduction Kingdom authorities to study possible solution to the problem of the A 344 main road crossing the Year(s) of Inscription 1986 avenue at Stonehenge (detour, digging of a tunnel, Agency responsible for site management etc.). It would be desirable for the Committee to be informed of the progress of these studies at its next • Mailing Address(es) meeting. English Heritage - Stonehenge The Close 65 Committee (1986): The Committee noted with SP1 2EN Salisbury satisfaction the assurances provided by the Wiltshire authorities of the United Kingdom that the closure United Kingdom of the road which crosses the avenue at e-mail: [email protected] Stonehenge was receiving serious consideration as part of the overall plans for the future management website: www.english-heritage.org.uk/stonehenge of the site.
[Show full text]
Sunt Bark Powder: Alternative Retanning Agent for Shoe Upper Leather Manufacture
International Journal of Advance Industrial Engineering E-ISSN 2320 –5539 ©2018 INPRESSCO®, All Rights Reserved Available at http://inpressco.com/category/ijaie/ Research Article Sunt Bark Powder: Alternative Retanning Agent for Shoe Upper Leather Manufacture * ^* # M.H Abdella , A.E Musa and S.B Ali #Department of Leather Engineering, School of Industrial Engineering and Technology, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum – Sudan ^Department of Leather Technology, College of Applied and Industrial Sciences, University of Bahri, Khartoum – Sudan Received 01 April 2018, Accepted 01 June 2018, Available online 05 June 2018, Vol.6, No.2 (June 2018) Abstract The retanning process is a very important step in leather manufacturing because it overcomes some of the disadvantages of chrome tannage and it can contributes to further stabilization of collagen fibers and good handle of leather, such as fullness, softness, elasticity and so on. In order to meet customers’ requirements, a wide variety of retanning agents are used in retanning process viz. vegetable tan and phenolic synthetic/organic tanning materials. Sunt bark, widely distributed in Sudan, has been evaluated for its utilization in the retanning of the leathers. In the present investigation, sunt bark powder has been used for the retanning of wet blue leathers. The effectiveness sunt bark in retanning of wet blue leathers has been compared with wattle retanning. The organoleptic properties of the leathers viz. softness, fullness, grain smoothness, grain tightness (break), general appearance, uniformity of dyeing of sunt bark retanned leather have been evaluated in comparison with wattle retanned leathers. Sunt retanning resulted in leathers with good grain tightness.
[Show full text]
Stonehenge and Avebury WHS Management Plan 2015 Summary
Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 1 Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site Vision The Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site is universally important for its unique and dense concentration of outstanding prehistoric monuments and sites which together form a landscape without parallel. We will work together to care for and safeguard this special area and provide a tranquil, rural and ecologically diverse setting for it and its archaeology. This will allow present and future generations to explore and enjoy the monuments and their landscape setting more fully. We will also ensure that the special qualities of the World Heritage Site are presented, interpreted and enhanced where appropriate, so that visitors, the local community and the whole world can better understand and value the extraordinary achievements © K020791 Historic England © K020791 Historic of the prehistoric people who left us this rich legacy. Avebury Stone Circle We will realise the cultural, scientific and educational potential of the World Heritage Site as well as its social and economic benefits for the community. © N060499 Historic England © N060499 Historic Stonehenge in summer 2 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 1 World Heritage Sites © K930754 Historic England © K930754 Historic Arable farming in the WHS below the Ridgeway, Avebury The Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site is internationally important for its complexes of outstanding prehistoric monuments. Stonehenge is the most architecturally sophisticated prehistoric stone circle in the world, while Avebury is Stonehenge and Avebury were inscribed as a single World Heritage Site in 1986 for their outstanding prehistoric monuments the largest.
[Show full text]
9. a Fixed Abode: Neolithic Houses in County Carlow TJ O’Connell and Nial O’Neill
9. A fixed abode: Neolithic houses in County Carlow TJ O’Connell and Nial O’Neill Illus. 1—Location of the sites at Russellstown and Busherstown, Co. Carlow (based on the Ordnance Survey Ireland map). The type of evidence that archaeologists uncover for Neolithic settlement in Ireland can come in a variety of forms, ranging from small-scale temporary sites to larger, more permanent enclosed landscapes such as the Céide fields in County Mayo. Neolithic buildings form one part of this mosaic of settlement evidence. The remains of two Early Neolithic rectangular houses were excavated in the townlands of Russellstown and Busherstown, Co. Carlow, by Headland Archaeology Ltd in 2006 on behalf of Carlow County Council and the NRA.1 This work was undertaken in advance of construction works for the N9/N10 Kilcullen–Waterford Road Scheme: Prumpelstown to Powerstown (Illus. 1). Their identification and excavation provide important additions to our knowledge of this site type in a part of the country where they have not been documented previously. Prior to the discovery of these buildings, evidence of Neolithic settlement in County Carlow was limited to a number of impressive funerary monuments, such as Kernanstown Portal Tomb (Record of Monuments and Places no. CW007-010), known locally as Brownshill Dolmen, and the Baunogenasraid Linkardstown-type burial tomb (CW008- 031001). Both the Russellstown and Busherstown sites were located within a 3.5 km radius of Brownshill Dolmen and within 5 km of the Baunogenasraid tumulus. Although it cannot 85 Dining and Dwelling be proven at present, the likelihood that those involved in building these tombs may have lived in one or both of the houses under discussion cannot be discounted.
[Show full text]
How to Tell a Cromlech from a Quoit ©
How to tell a cromlech from a quoit © As you might have guessed from the title, this article looks at different types of Neolithic or early Bronze Age megaliths and burial mounds, with particular reference to some well-known examples in the UK. It’s also a quick overview of some of the terms used when describing certain types of megaliths, standing stones and tombs. The definitions below serve to illustrate that there is little general agreement over what we could classify as burial mounds. Burial mounds, cairns, tumuli and barrows can all refer to man- made hills of earth or stone, are located globally and may include all types of standing stones. A barrow is a mound of earth that covers a burial. Sometimes, burials were dug into the original ground surface, but some are found placed in the mound itself. The term, barrow, can be used for British burial mounds of any period. However, round barrows can be dated to either the Early Bronze Age or the Saxon period before the conversion to Christianity, whereas long barrows are usually Neolithic in origin. So, what is a megalith? A megalith is a large stone structure or a group of standing stones - the term, megalith means great stone, from two Greek words, megas (meaning: great) and lithos (meaning: stone). However, the general meaning of megaliths includes any structure composed of large stones, which include tombs and circular standing structures. Such structures have been found in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, North and South America and may have had religious significance. Megaliths tend to be put into two general categories, ie dolmens or menhirs.
[Show full text]
Silbury Hill – А Case Study with LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY: SILBURY HILL – a CASE STUDY LIONEL LIONEL SIMS LIONEL SIMS
VI. LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY AND ARCHAEOASTRONOMY INTEGRATING ARCHAEOASTRONOMY Integrating Archaeology: with Landscape ArchaeoastronomySilbury Hill – а Case Study WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY: SILBURY HILL – A CASE STUDY LIONEL LIONEL SIMS LIONEL SIMS Abstract Weaknesses in both archaeoastronomy and landscape archaeology can be overcome by their combination. This is demonstrat- ed through a new interpretation of Silbury Hill in Avebury, Wiltshire. If monuments in their local landscape are considered as one choice in a system of alternatives, tests can be devised to intepret the prehistoric builders‘ intentions. This exercise finds that the builders chose a prescriptive arrangement of views of Silbury Hill to simulate a facsimile of the moon entering and returning from the underworld. Key words: dark moon, crescent moon, paired alignments, Silbury Hill, West Kennet Avenue, Beckhampton Avenue, Ave- bury, underworld. Introduction with a level circular summit platform.To date, no con- vincing explanation as to its meaning has been offered. Archaeoastronomy has to move on from the legacy of Archaeologists have long expected that excavating the the Thom paradigm if it is to prove its relevance to sci- interior of the hill would reveal burials or deposited ar- ence (Sims 2006). Over the last three decades the dis- tefacts that would provide the clues to its decoding. In cipline has established robust field methods procedures spite of the many tunnels that have been dug, so much and, in so doing, falsified Thom‘s claim for a prehis- so that the Hill has now to be rescued from imminent toric precision astronomy (Thom 1971; Ruggles 1999; collapse, no burials have been found nor interpretive Hoskin 2001, Belmonte 2006; Schaefer 1993; North breakthroughs made.
[Show full text]
0.00 Download Free
This is an Open Access publication. Visit our website for more OA publication, to read any of our books for free online, or to buy them in print or PDF. www.sidestone.com Check out some of our latest publications: ANALECTA PRAEHISTORICA LEIDENSIA 45 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd I 16/07/15 13:00 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd II 16/07/15 13:00 ANALECTA PRAEHISTORICA LEIDENSIA PUBLICATION OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHAEOLOGY LEIDEN UNIVERSITY EXCERPTA ARCHAEOLOGICA LEIDENSIA EDITED BY CORRIE BAKELS AND HANS KAMERMANS LEIDEN UNIVERSITY 2015 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd III 16/07/15 13:00 Series editors: Corrie Bakels / Hans Kamermans Editor of illustrations: Joanne Porck Copyright 2015 by the Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden ISSN 0169-7447 ISBN 978-90-822251-2-9 Subscriptions to the series Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia can be ordered at: P.J.R. Modderman Stichting Faculty of Archaeology P.O. Box 9514 NL-2300 RA Leiden The Netherlands 98163_APL_45_Voorwerk.indd IV 16/07/15 13:00 Contents The stable isotopes 13C and 15N in faunal bone of the Middle Pleistocene site Schöningen (Germany): statistical modeling 1 Juliette Funck Thijs van Kolfschoten Hans van der Plicht ‘Trapping the past’? Hunting for remote capture techniques and planned coastal exploitation during MIS 5 at Blombos Cave and Klasies River, South Africa 15 Gerrit L. Dusseldorp Geeske H.J. Langejans A Late Neolithic Single Grave Culture burial from Twello (central Netherlands): environmental setting, burial ritual and contextualisation 29 Lucas Meurkens Roy van Beek Marieke Doorenbosch Harry
[Show full text]
The Black Wattle in Hawaii and Recommend the Same for Publication As Bulle Tin No
HAWAII AQRICULTVRAL EXPERIMENT STA'I'IO!i. :J. G. SI\IITH, SPECIAJ:, AGENT IN CHARGE. BULLETIN No. 11. ·THE BLACK·WATTLE (Acacia c!eCUt'f,ens) IN HAWAII. BY JARED G. SMITH, SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE, HAWAII AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. UNDER THE. _Sl,l'ERVISION .. OJ' OF'F_ICE OF EXPERIMENT STP.TIONS, U.S. !)epartment ofAgriculture. WASHINGTON: :: ·--<: ;,: .. '~. -- .'. GOVERN~IENT PRI)'<TING. OFFICE: 1996. 863 HAWAII AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. J. G. SMITH, SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE. BULLETIN No. 11. 'THE BLACK WATTLE (Acacia decurrens) IN HA\VAII. BY JARED G. SMITH, SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE, HAWAII AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF OFFICE OF EXPERIMENT STATIONS, U. S. Department ofAgriculture. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. I 9 06. HAWAII AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION, HONOLULU. [Under the supervision of A. C. TRuE; Director of the Office of Experiment Stations, United States Department of Agriculture.] STATION STAFF. JARED G. SMITH, Special, Agent in Charge. D. L. VAN DINE, Entomotogist. EDMUND C. SHOREY, Chemist. J.E. HIGGINS, Horticulturist. F. G. KRAUSS, In Charge of Rice Investigations. Q. Q. BRADFORD, Farm Foreman. C. R; BLACOW; In Charge ofTobacco Experiments (P. 0., Paauilo, Hawaii). \2) LETTER OF TRANSMITl'AL. HONOLULU, HAWAII, January 1, 1906. Sm: I have the honor to transmit herewith a paper on The Black Wattle in Hawaii and recommend the same for publication as Bulle tin No. 11 of the Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. Very respectfully, JARED G. SMITH, Special Agent in Charge, Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. Dr. A. C. TRUE, Director, Office of Experiment Stations, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. 0.
[Show full text]
Curriculum Vitae
H A I N E S G A L L E R Y DAVID NASH Born in Surrey, England, 1945 Lives and works in Blaenau Ffestiniog, North Wales, UK EDUCATION 1965 Kingston College of Art, UK 1970 Chelsea School of Art, London, UK SELECTED SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2019 David Nash: 200 Seasons, Towner Art Gallery, Eastbourne, UK David Nash: Trees, Galerie Lelong & Co., Paris, France David Nash: Sculpture through the Seasons, National Museum Cardiff, Wales 2018 Tout jaune, Galerie Simon Blais, Montreal, Canada Columns, Galerie Lelong & Co., Paris, France David Nash: Nature to Nature, Fondation Fernet-Branca, Saint-Louis, France David Nash: Wood, Metal, Pigment, Annely Judah Fine Art, London, UK First The Tree, Then The Shape, Museum Lothar Fischer, Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz, Germany 2017 With Space in Mind, Tremenheere Sculpture Gardens, Penzance, UK New Beginnings, Alan Cristea Gallery, London, UK David Nash, Galeria Simon Blais, Montreal, Canada David Nash, Galeria Alvaro Alcazar, Madrid, Spain Art Project, Krauhuegel & Art and Church, Kollegienkirche, Salzburg, Austria Tree Seasons, Plas Glyn-y-Weddw, Gwynedd, Wales 2016 David Nash: Columns, Peaks and Torso, Galerie Lelong, Paris, France 2015 With Space in Mind, Alan Cristea Gallery, London, UK Three Black Humps, Coalbrookdale Museum of Iron, Shropshire, UK King & Queen I, Keepers House The Royal Academy, London, UK 2014 David Nash Stencil Prints, Abbot’s Room, Kloster Schoenthal, Switzerland David Nash: Prints and Multiples, Galerie Lelong, Paris, France David Nash, Kukje Gallery, Seoul, South Korea David Nash: From
[Show full text]
Wattle and Daub
Wattle and Daub ”The greatest part of our building in the cities and good towns of England consisteth only of timber, for as yet few of the houses of the communalty (except here and there in the west country towns) are made of stone….’these english’, quoth he [a Spaniard of Queen Mary’s day] , 'have their houses made of sticks and dirt, but they fare commonly so well as the king”. William Harrison, Description of England, 1587 Wattle and daub is the term for the panels of woven wood and mud used to fill between the timbers of many of the Museum’s buildings. This combination of materials has been used since at least the Bronze Age; fragmentary remains of daub-like mixtures bearing wattle imprints often survive in the archaeological record having been ‘fired’ as a building burnt down and waterlogged remains of wattle panels occasionally survive also. Brick nogging might also have been used to fill in between the timbers but this was also sometimes used to replace earlier wattle and daub. Evidence for the previous existence for wattle and daub panels may come from marks left on the main timbers by daub, and from auger holes drilled into the upper timber of the panel and grooves cut into the lower where the uprights for the wattle were fitted in. Timber framing with wattle and daub panels was the dominant form of building construction in many parts of England and Wales from the mid 12th century. It was common in some areas until the late 18th century and was used into the 19th century for lower status housing.
[Show full text]