INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL
REHAN YOUSAF
8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “TUNNEL SAFETY & VENTILATION” GRAZ, 2016 APRIL 25TH 2016 PRESENTATION OUTLINE
Background Ventilation Aim & Objectives Methodology Investigated Scenarios Results Conclusions
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 2
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 BACKGROUND
Swiss cantons of Uri and Wallis were connected by Furka Summit Tunnel (opened in 1926) Furka Base Tunnel 15.4 km long Furka base tunnel replaces Furka Summit tunnel in 1982 Two cross junctions namely “Geren (single track twin tube) ” and “Rotondo (double track single tube)” One access gallery “Bedretto” is Furka Summit Tunnel located mid way of tunnel Bi-directional train traffic Single track tunnel Twin track tunnel Tunnel < 100 100 - > 300 < 100 100 - > 300 Categorized “C” according to swiss Length trains/ 300 trains/ trains/ 300 trains/ [m] day trains/ day day trains/ day guide line “Sicherheitsanforderungen day day für bestehende Eisenbahntunnel (10. < 300 A A A A A A Aug 2009)” 300-1000 B B B B B B 1000-3000 B C C B C C “Update Furka” Tunnel refurbishment 3000-10’000 C C C C D D project to be completed by 2022 > 10’000 C D D C D D
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 3
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 VENTILATION: AIM
Ventilation aims at: Lower humidity level in tunnel Constructional ventilation Improve tunnel safety level in case of fire emergency A tunnel door and two axial fans are located mid way of tunnel to control ventilation
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 4
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 VENTILATION: CONCEPT
Emergency ventilation is activated only when an emergency train is stationary
Fire at front of train: Ventilation in direction of travel, escape opposite to direction of travel
Fire at rear of train: Ventilation opposite to direction of travel, escape in direction of travel
Fire location unknown or at middle of train: Ventilation opposite to direction of travel, escape in direction of travel
No pre-defined direction of flow exist in tunnel
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 5
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 AIM & OBJECTIVES
Proof of the proper functionality of the proposed ventilation system Highlight the short comings in the evacuation process in case of a fire emergency Evaluate the aero- thermodynamic conditions for the critical most scenario using coupled 1- and 3-dimensional “Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)” simulation Provide recommendations for the detailed rescue planning
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 6
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 METHODOLOGY
Distance vs time plot for different events. Analyse the flow for different operational scenarios (1-D velocity course) Plot distance vs time plot for smoke propagation (1-D visibility contour) Investigate 3-D smoke and thermal stratification for critical situations
5.6 min
8 min 2.5 m above walking surface 100°C
Time [min]Time Velocity [m/s] Velocity
Distance [m]
Time [min]
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 7
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 INVESTIGATED SCENARIOS
Standard scenarios Covers 83% operational conditions Assumption of emergency in single track tunnel section HGV fire on vehicle transport train Scenario Geren (Low air flow) Accidental stop of train in cross over junction “Geren” (smaller cross section tube) Train downstream of emergency train but before the tunnel door
Should the door be closed and non burning train should wait for ventilation ? Should the door be closed after the non burning train has passed through the door ? Presence of multiple trains in system Fire at mid of train or unknown location
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 8
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 RESULTS: STANDARD SCENARIO - VARIATION “V1”
Oberwald → Realp (A2466) HGV Fire at front Emergency stop in section HU Ventilation → Realp 1 axial fan in operation 200 Pa. adverse portal pressure (opposing fan flow direction)
20
18
16 ]
14
min [ 12
10
8
6
Time from fire ignition fire ignition from Time 4
2
0 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 Distance [m]
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 9
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 RESULTS: STANDARD SCENARIO - VARIATION “V2”
Oberwald → Realp (A2466) HGV Fire at front Emergency stop in section HU Ventilation → Realp 1 axial fan in operation 200 Pa. assisting portal pressure (pressure in fan flow direction)
20
18
16 ]
14
min [ 12
10
8
6
Time from fire ignition fire ignition from Time 4
2
0 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 Distance [m]
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 10
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 RESULTS: STANDARD SCENARIO - VARIATION “V3”
Oberwald → Realp (A2466) HGV Fire at front Realp → Oberwald (A2467) Emergency stop in section HU Ventilation → Realp 1 axial fan in operation 200 Pa. adverse portal pressure (opposing fan flow direction)
20
18
16 ]
14
min [ 12
10
8
6
Time from fire ignition fire ignition from Time 4
2
0 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 Distance [m]
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 11
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 RESULTS: STANDARD SCENARIO - VARIATION “V4”
Oberwald → Realp (A2466) HGV Fire at rear Realp → Oberwald (A2467) Emergency stop in section HU Ventilation → Oberwald 1 axial fan in operation 200 Pa. adverse portal pressure (opposing fan flow direction)
20
18
16 ]
14
min [ 12
10
8
6
Time from fire ignition fire ignition from Time 4
2
0 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 Distance [m]
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 12
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 RESULTS: STANDARD SCENARIO - VARIATION “V5”
Similar to variation 3 with following operational changes: Immediate contact with control centre as soon as train comes to a stop Immediate STOP command (within 30 seconds) from control centre for all trains in the tunnel network Simultaneous closing of doors and starting of ventilation fans 20
18
16 ]
14
min [ 12
10
8
6
Time from fire ignition fire ignition from Time 4
2
0 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 Distance [m]
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 13
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 RESULTS: SCENARIO GEREN
Oberwald → Realp (A2466) HGV Fire at rear Realp → Oberwald (A2467) Emergency stop in section GE Ventilation → Oberwald 2 axial fan in operation 200 Pa. adverse portal pressure (opposing fan flow direction) 3-D CFD was used to see smoke propagation and extent of back-layering
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 14
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 RESULTS: SCENARIO GEREN
2 minutes after fire ignition Emergency train is stopped A2467 moving towards OW Fire power 12 MW Ventilation not started
A2467
Fire
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 15
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 RESULTS: SCENARIO GEREN
6 minutes after fire ignition Emergency train is stopped A2467 moving towards RA Fire power 30 MW Ventilation 100%
A2467
Fire
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 16
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 RESULTS: SCENARIO GEREN
20 minutes after fire ignition Emergency train is stopped A2467 left the tunnel Fire power 30 MW Ventilation 100%
Fire
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 17
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 CONCLUSIONS
20
Effect of adverse portal pressure on the 18 WithoutFan adverse operational portal
16 measures ] ventilation system ] pressure (V1)
14
min
min [ [ With operational 12 Operational measures: measuresFan assisting 10 portal pressure Early stop signal 8 (V2)
6 Time from fire ignition fire ignition from Time Simultaneous closing of doors and starting of fire ignition from Time 4 ventilation fans 2 0 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 Non-emergency trains should evacuate after Distance [m] stabilized flow conditions occur in tunnel Ventilation system should be kept simple and reliable
A calculated risk has to be considered for 6 minutes after fire ignition A2467 - Emergency train is stopped certain extreme cases (e.g. “Geren”) - A2467 moving towards RA - Fire power 30 MW Emergency ventilation should run at its full - Ventilation 100% Initial direction of capacity travel Fire Ventilation control in its current implementation improves the escape conditions for Furka tunnel
INVESTIGATING DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY VENTILATION SYSTEM IN FURKA TUNNEL 18
8th Int. Conference ‘Tunnel Safety & Ventilation’, Graz, 2016 THANK YOU
CONTACT: REHAN YOUSAF SENIOR ENGINEER [email protected] +41 76 356 20 68
Consulting. Engineering. Projects. Operations. www.poyry.com