Notes and References

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Notes and References Notes and References Chapter One 1. General authorities for Shelley's family background and early life are: Newman I. White, Shelley (New York, 1940), the standard biog­ raphy; Kenneth Neill Cameron, The Young Shelley (New York, 1950); Roger Ingpen, Shelley in England (London, 1917); The Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley, ed. Frederick L. Jones (Oxford, 1964). 2. Cameron, Young Shelley, p. 40. 3. Humbert Wolfe, ed., The Life of Percy Bysshe Shelley (London, 1933), II, 326-27. This clergyman, hitherto unidentified, was Evan Edwards (1751?-1839). His nickname was "Taffy," and some measure of his influence on Shelley is suggested by Shelley's mention of him in his letter to Elizabeth Hitchener, ?December 10, 1811 (Letters, I, 200). 4. Humbert Wolfe, ed., Life of PBS, I, 30. 5. Letters, I, 2-4. The correct date of the first letter is probably, as Cameron suggested in Young Shelley (p. 295, note 46), January 10, 1809, not 1808. 6. The novel is dated 1811, but see Letters, I, 26. 7. On the authorship, dating, and publication of these two works, see Cameron, Young Shelley, pp. 304-06,307-13. 8. See Kenneth Neill Cameron, Shelley and his Circle (Cambridge, Mass., 1961), I, 35-38. 9. See Shelley and his Circle, II, 475-540. 10. Letters, I, 219n. See also Southey to Charles Danvers, January 13, 1812, New Letters of Robert Southey, ed. Kenneth Curry (New York and London, 1965), II, 19-22. 11. See Kenneth Neill Cameron, "Shelley vs. Southey: New Light on an Old Quarrel," Publications of the Modem Language Association, LVII (June 1942), 489-512. 12. Denis Florence MacCarthy, Shelley's Early Life (London, 1872),pp.240-43. 13. Later in the century, however, the Letter to Lord Ellenborough 163 164 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY gained some currency among radicals and was at least twice reprinted upon similar infringements of freedom of the press (Cameron, Young Shelley, p. 186). 14. Letters, I, 336. See also Letters, I, 331n, and White, Shelley, I, 238-42,262-65,645-46. 15. Cameron, Young Shelley, pp.187-91. 16. Letters, I, 355n-56n. 17. Cameron, Young Shelley, pp. 205-14; H. M. Dowling, Keats­ Shelley Memorial Bulletin, XII (1961), 28-36; and White, Shelley, I, 281-85. 18. The best discussions of this important but little-known work are: Cameron, Young Shelley, pp. 274-87, and C. E. Pulos, The Deep Truth: A Study of Shelley's Scepticism (Lincoln, Nebraska, 1954), pp. 91-97. 19. See, for example, Letters, I, 315-16 (to Godwin, July 29, 1812). 20. Harry Buxton Forman, The Shelley Library (London, 1886), PP· 35-58. 21. The Esdaile Notebook: A Volume of Early Poems by Percy Bysshe Shelley (New York, 1964). 22. Of the poems in the notebook, six are sonnets, two are in Spen­ serian stanzas; and there appear sixteen other rhymed stanzaic pat­ terns of from six to twelve lines (besides unrhymed and irregularly rhymed poems and poems in quatrains). Chapter Two I. For an interpretation by an acknowledged partisan of Harriet, see Louise Schutz Boas, Harriet Shelley: Five Long Years (London and New York, 1962). 2. See Letters, I, 423n and, especially, F. L. Jones's essay in Shelley and his Circle, III, 423-34. 3. Louise Schutz Boas, "'Erasmus Perkins' and Shelley," Modern Language Notes, LXX (June 1955), 408-13. 4. Edward Dowden, The Life of Percy Bysshe Shelley (London, 1886), I, 525-30; Humbert Wolfe, ed., Life of PBS, II, 340-41. 5. Harold Bloom, The Visionary Company (Garden City, N.Y., 1961), p. 280. 6. "Love," for Shelley, is eros, a desire for the possession of good qualities not found in the lover but in the beloved; love is based on inequality. 7. "Youth" refers to the young poet who is the protagonist; "Poet" refers to the persona of Shelley who speaks the two invocations and the concluding lines of Alastor. 8. See Joseph Raben, "Shelley's Prometheus Unbound: Why the In­ dian Caucasus?" Keats-Shelley Journal, XII (1963), 95-106. Raben, Notes and References 165 while explaining Shelley's use of the Hindu Kush (Indian Caucasus} in Prometheus, doubts that the same mountains were the goal of the Youth in Alastor; but the geography of Alastor indicates that the In­ dian, not the European range, is intended. 9. Irene H. Chayes, "Plato's Statesman Myth in Shelley and Blake," Comparative Literature, XIII (Fall 1961}, 358-69. 10. Again the analogue is the myth in Plato's Statesman; the progress of the boat can be seen, geographically, as an ascent of the Oxus River from the Aral Sea to its source in the Hindu Kush range (the Indian Caucasus). 11. Pine trees also symbolize this struggle in "Mont Blanc" ( 20-24, 109-11) and other poems. 12. Leslie Marchand, Byron: A Biography (New York, 1957}, II, 603-08. Chapter Three 1. See Fanny's letters in Shelley and Mary, I, 93-95, 104-13, 140- 42, 143-46. For other interpretations of this tragedy, see White, Shel­ ley, I, 470-71, and Burton R. Pollin, "Fanny Godwin's Suicide Re-examined," Etudes Anglaises, XVIII (Fall1965), 258-68. 2. White, Shelley, I, 480-85; cf. Cameron, "The Last Days of Har­ riet Shelley," Shelley and his Circle, IV, 769-802. 3. Boas, Harriet Shelley, pp. 197-98. 4. C. Kegan Paul, William Godwin: His Friends and Contemporaries (Boston, 1876), II, 246. 5. For the facts and problems relating to the publication of this pamphlet, see White, Shelley, I, 544-46, 7 44 (note 70). 6. E.g., Wordswmth's theory of diction in the Preface to Lyrical Bal­ lads ( 1800; amended 1802) and Coleridge's in Biographia Literaria (1817}. 7. In the notebook in which he began composing his poem, Shelley wrote: "Is this an imitation of Ld. Byron's poem? It is certainly written in the same metre. Coleridge and Wordsworth to be considered" (Verse and Prose from the Manuscripts of Percy Bysshe Shelley, ed. John C. E. Shelley-Rolls and Roger Ingpen [London, 1934], p. 12). There are also verbal echoes of "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" and "The Prisoner of Chillon" in Canto III of The Revolt, and the poem uses ideas and techniques drawn both from Wordsworth's early poems and from The White Doe of Rylstone. 8. The woman probably alludes here to the Youth of Alastor, thus making The Revolt of Islam, in a sense, a sequel to the earlier poem. 9. See Kenneth Neill Cameron, "A Major Source of The Revolt of Islam," Publications of the Modern Language Association, LVI (March 166 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY 1941), 175-206, for the influence of Volney's Ruins of Empire on this and many other passages of the poem. 10. The Poetical Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, ed. H. Buxton Forman (London, 1876), I, 97. 11. See Titus I.15. That Shelley was, in part, reacting to charges that he, Byron, Mary, and Claire had formed a "league of incest" at Lake Geneva seems clear from his disclaimer in a footnote to the Pref­ ace: "The sentiments connected with and characteristic of this circum­ stance have no personal reference to the Writer" (Poetical Works, ed. Forman, I, 98). Certainly Shelley was foolhardy, in view of the per­ sonal slanders centering on this very question, to fly into the face of public opinion; as it was, the Tory Quarterly Review obtained a copy of Laon and Cythna in its unexpurgated form and in reviewing it made capital of Shelley's defense of incest. 12. Book X; Loeb Classical Library Edition (Cambridge, Mass., 1961), III, 303-05. 13. For a full account of Shelley's recurring use of earthquakes, vol­ canoes, and other terrestrial disturbances as symbols of the uprising of the human spirit against tyranny, see G. M. Matthews, "A Volcano's Voice in Shelley," Journal of English Literary History, XXIV ( 1957), 191-228. 14. This apocalyptic horse is at once a symbol of destiny and of un­ corrupted nature. Shelley's handling of its relationship to the theme owes much to Wordsworth's White Doe of Rylstone (1815). 15. Thomas Medwin, The Life of Percy Bysshe Shelley, ed. H. Bux­ ton Forman (London, 1913), pp. 178-79. 16. Julian, VI, 227-52. Chapter Four 1. See Mary's note on the poem (OSA, pp. 188-89) and Letters, II, 29, 31 and note. 2. The holograph draft of "On Love" comes just before that of the "Discourse on the manners of the Antient Greeks relative to the subject of Love" in Bodleian MS Shelley adds. e. 11: "On Love," pp. 1-9; "Dis­ course," pp. 17-41. 3. Letters, II, 32-38; White, Shelley, II, 29. 4. Published with Rosalind and Helen ( 1819). See Donald H. Rei­ man, "Structure, Symbol, and Theme in 'Lines written among the Euganean Hills,'" Publications of the Modern Language Association, LXXVII (September 1962), 404-13. 5. See "Boat on the Serchio," 26-27, the only other use of the word "rooks" in Shelley's poetry. 6. Shelley, II, 42-50. 7. Dowden, Life of Percy Bysshe Shelley, II, 238; Baker, Shelley's Notes and References 167 Mafor Poetry, pp. 124-38; G. M. Matthews, "'Julian and Maddalo': The Draft and the Meaning," Studia Neophilologica, XXXV (1963), 57-84. 8. For adverse comments on Byron, see Shelley to Peacock, Decem­ ber 17 or 18, 1818 (Letters, II, 57-58). Chapter Five I. The only account mentioning the Shelleys' stay in Naples (except their own letters and laconic journal entries) is that by Charles Mac­ Farlane (1799-1858), Reminiscences of a Literary Life, intro. John F. Tattersall (New York, 1917), pp.
Recommended publications
  • The Rhinehart Collection Rhinehart The
    The The Rhinehart Collection Spine width: 0.297 inches Adjust as needed The Rhinehart Collection at appalachian state university at appalachian state university appalachian state at An Annotated Bibliography Volume II John higby Vol. II boone, north carolina John John h igby The Rhinehart Collection i Bill and Maureen Rhinehart in their library at home. ii The Rhinehart Collection at appalachian state university An Annotated Bibliography Volume II John Higby Carol Grotnes Belk Library Appalachian State University Boone, North Carolina 2011 iii International Standard Book Number: 0-000-00000-0 Library of Congress Catalog Number: 0-00000 Carol Grotnes Belk Library, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina 28608 © 2011 by Appalachian State University. All rights reserved. First Edition published 2011 Designed and typeset by Ed Gaither, Office of Printing and Publications. The text face and ornaments are Adobe Caslon, a revival by designer Carol Twombly of typefaces created by English printer William Caslon in the 18th century. The decorative initials are Zallman Caps. The paper is Carnival Smooth from Smart Papers. It is of archival quality, acid-free and pH neutral. printed in the united states of america iv Foreword he books annotated in this catalogue might be regarded as forming an entity called Rhinehart II, a further gift of material embodying British T history, literature, and culture that the Rhineharts have chosen to add to the collection already sheltered in Belk Library. The books of present concern, diverse in their
    [Show full text]
  • The Necessity of Atheism Shelley, Percy Bysshe
    The Necessity of Atheism Shelley, Percy Bysshe Published: 1811 Categorie(s): Non-Fiction, Religion Source: Wikisource http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Neces- sity_of_Atheism_(Shelley) 1 About Shelley: Percy Bysshe Shelley (4 August 1792 – 8 July 1822) was one of the major English Romantic poets and is critically regarded as among the finest lyric poets in the English language. A rad- ical in his poetry and his political and social views, fame eluded him during his lifetime, but recognition grew steadily following his death. Shelley was a key member of a close circle of vision- ary poets and writers that included Lord Byron; Leigh Hunt; Thomas Love Peacock; and his own second wife, Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein. Shelley's early profession of athe- ism (in the tract "The Necessity of Atheism") led to his expul- sion from Oxford and branded him a radical agitator and thinker, setting an early pattern of marginalisation and ostra- cism from the intellectual and political circles of his time. His close circle of admirers, however, included some progressive thinkers of the day, including his future father-in-law, the philosopher William Godwin. Though Shelley's poetry and prose output remained steady throughout his life, most pub- lishers and journals declined to publish his work for fear of be- ing arrested themselves for blasphemy or sedition. Shelley did not live to see success and influence, although these reach down to the present day not only in literature, but in major movements in social and political thought. Shelley became an idol of the next three or four generations of poets, including important Victorian and Pre-Raphaelite poets such as Robert Browning, and Dante Gabriel Rosetti.
    [Show full text]
  • Premature and Dissolving Endings in Shelley's Poetry Author[S]: Julia Tejblum Source: Moveabletype, Vol
    Article: The Fisher, The Spear, and the Fortunate Fish: Premature and Dissolving Endings in Shelley's Poetry Author[s]: Julia Tejblum Source: MoveableType, Vol. 7, ‘Intersections’ (2014) DOI: 10.14324/111.1755-4527.059 MoveableType is a Graduate, Peer-Reviewed Journal based in the Department of English at UCL. © 2014 Julia Tejblum. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) 4.0https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The Fisher, the Spear, and the Fortunate Fish: Premature and Dissolving Endings in Shelley’s Poetry Walter Benjamin famously o served that our interest in narrative is bound up not only with our in" terest in life, but, more tellingly, with our interest in death: we hope to learn something of the meaning of our o!n lives from the lives of fctional chara$ters, but mu$h of that meaning is revealed to us only through our witnessing the chara$ter’s death% The revelation of meaning through death, which Ben" jamin likens to cat$hing the heat of a fame, is impossi le without fction, sin$e none of us survives our o!n death and, therefore, none can ta&e part in the revelation unless it is at the e(pense of another: )What dra!s the reader to the novel is the hope of warming his shivering life with a death he reads a out%*+ But Benjamin’s o servations go beyond the sphere of the novel; a curiosity a out any narrative ending is a curiosity
    [Show full text]
  • From Poet to Poet Or Shelley's Inconsistencies in Keats's Panegyric
    From Poet to Poet or Shelley’s Inconsistencies in Keats’s Panegyric: Adonais as an Autobiographical Work of Art by Caroline Bertonèche (Paris 3) Adonais, in short, is such an elegy as poet might be expected to write upon poet. The author has had before him his recollections of Lycidas, of Moschus and Bion, and of the doctrines of Plato; and in the stanza of the most poetical of poets, Spenser, has brought his own genius, in all its ethereal beauty, to lead a pomp of Loves, Graces, and Intelligences, in honour of the departed. (Leigh Hunt, “Unsigned Review of Adonais”, The Examiner, 7 juillet 1822)1 I have engaged these last days in composing a poem on the death of John Keats, which will shortly be finished; and I anticipate the pleasure of reading it to you, as some of the very few persons who will be interested in it and understand it. It is a highly wrought piece of art, perhaps better in point of composition than anything I have written. (Lettre de Shelley à John et Maria Gisborne, 5 juin 1821, Complete Works, X 270) When Shelley said of Adonais, not long after its completion, that it was its most accomplished piece of art, “better in point of composition than anything [he] ha[d] written” while mentioning, in his Preface, the “feeble tribute of applause” (Shelley’s Poetry and Prose 392) it nonetheless represents, he does not to seem to want to hide his own sense of personal satisfaction, nor does he fail to confess certain obvious limitations in his work as a Romantic elegist.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGE GORDON, LORD BYRON: a Literary-Biographical-Critical
    1 GEORGE GORDON, LORD BYRON: A literary-biographical-critical database 2: by year CODE: From National Library in Taiwan UDD: unpublished doctoral dissertation Books and Articles Referring to Byron, by year 1813-1824: Anon. A Sermon on the Death of Byron, by a Layman —— Lines on the departure of a great poet from this country, 1816 —— An Address to the Rt. Hon. Lord Byron, with an opinion on some of his writings, 1817 —— The radical triumvirate, or, infidel Paine, Lord Byron, and Surgeon Lawrenge … A Letter to John Bull, from a Oxonian resident in London, 1820 —— A letter to the Rt. Hon. Lord Byron, protesting against the immolation of Gray, Cowper and Campbell, at the shrine of Pope, The Pamphleteer Vol 8, 1821 —— Lord Byron’s Plagiarisms, Gentleman’s Magazine, April 1821; Lord Byron Defended from a Charge of Plagiarism, ibid —— Plagiarisms of Lord Byron Detected, Monthly Magazine, August 1821, September 1821 —— A letter of expostulation to Lord Byron, on his present pursuits; with animadversions on his writings and absence from his country in the hour of danger, 1822 —— Uriel, a poetical address to Lord Byron, written on the continent, 1822 —— Lord Byron’s Residence in Greece, Westminster Review July 1824 —— Full Particulars of the much lamented Death of Lord Byron, with a Sketch of his Life, Character and Manners, London 1824 —— Robert Burns and Lord Byron, London Magazine X, August 1824 —— A sermon on the death of Lord Byron, by a Layman, 1824 Barker, Miss. Lines addressed to a noble lord; – his Lordship will know why, – by one of the small fry of the Lakes 1815 Belloc, Louise Swanton.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- Says, Moral and Political, 2 Vols
    Notes Introduction 1. Robert Southey, “On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- says, Moral and Political, 2 vols. (1817; London: John Murray, 1832), II, 82. The identity of Junius remained a mystery, and even Edmund Burke was suspected. For an argument that he was Sir Philip Francis, see Alvar Ellegård, Who Was Junius? (The Hague, 1962). 2. Byron, “The Vision of Judgment” in Lord Byron: The Complete Poetical Works, ed. Jerome J. McGann and Barry Weller, 7 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980–92), VI, 309–45. 3. M. H. Abrams, Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Ro- mantic Literature (New York: W. W. Norton, 1971), p. 13. 4. See Anne K. Mellor, English Romantic Irony (Cambridge: Harvard Univer- sity Press, 1980). 5. Jerome J. McGann, The Romantic Ideology: A Critical Investigation (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1983), pp. 23–24. 6. Jerome J. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), p. 39. 7. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge, p. 39. 8. McGann, “Literary Pragmatics and the Editorial Horizon,” in Devils and Angels: Textual Editing and Literary Theory, ed. Philip Cohen (Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1991), pp. 1–21 (13). 9. Marilyn Butler, “Satire and the Images of Self in the Romantic Period: The Long Tradition of Hazlitt’s Liber Amoris,” in English Satire and the Satiric Tradition, ed. Claude Rawson (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984), 209–25 (209). 10. Stuart Curran, Poetic Form and British Romanticism (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 12–13. 11. Gary Dyer, British Satire and the Politics of Style, 1789–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Frankenstein's Theatrical Doppelgänger
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013-08-27 From Prometheus to Presumption: Frankenstein's Theatrical Doppelgänger Reid, Brittany Lee Alexandra Reid, B. L. (2013). From Prometheus to Presumption: Frankenstein's Theatrical Doppelgänger (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/26236 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/894 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY From Prometheus to Presumption: Frankenstein’s Theatrical Doppelgänger by Brittany Reid A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH CALGARY, ALBERTA AUGUST, 2013 © Brittany Reid 2013 ii Abstract This thesis examines the Doppelgänger relationship between Victor Frankenstein and the Creature, as it is characterized through both Frankenstein and its first theatrical adaptation. With a specific focus on Richard Brinsley Peake’s 1823 gothic melodrama, Presumption; or, The Fate of Frankenstein I unpack how the novel’s cross-medium adaptation leads to a changed conception of the relationship of its central characters. In Frankenstein, Victor is the focal figure and acts as the Creature’s dominant counterpart. However, the characters’ cross-medium adaptation from page to stage inverts this Doppelgänger relationship from Shelley’s initial conception in the novel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thanatic Corporeality of Edward Onslow Ford's Shelley Memorial
    Chapter 4 of David J. Getsy, Body Doubles: Sculpture in Britain, 1877-1905 (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2004), revised and expanded from an article of the same title published in Visual Culture in Britain 3.1 (April 2002): 53-76 4 "Hard Realism": The Thanatic Corporeality of Edward Onslow Ford's Shelley Memorial Some have skeletons in their closets; Oxford has a corpse. Since its unveiling in 1893, Edward Onslow Ford's memorial to the poet Percy Bysshe Shelley has been a disconcerting presence at University College (figs. 71, 77-81). Often met with derision, the Shelley Memorial has suf­ fered perennial undergraduate pranks, vandalism, and recurring attempts to bury - or at least move - this uneasy and awkward body. In art-historical accounts of the period, the work has been quietly passed over despite its importance to late Victorian sculpture and criticism.' All of this squeamishness, however, is precisely the point. Almost a century before the corpse would be explored by sculptors like Paul Thek, Robert Gober, or Marc Quinn Edward Onslow Ford brought the viewer face to face with thanatic corporeality. Ford used the commission for the ShelleyMemorial to formulate a polemical contribution to the on-going debates about the propriety and potential of sculptural verisimilitude. He employed the corpse as the embodiment of realism itself and made the figure of Shelley its poetic allegory. In this work he posited a highly self-conscious and self-reflexive articulation of verisimilitude and its overlap with the materiality of the sculptural object. Despite the fact that he would become one of the pillars of the sculptural renaissance in the 1880s and 1890s, Ford had little of the formal training in sculpture from which his col­ leagues benefited.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Shelley: Life and Works British Romantic Indira Gandhi Literature National Open University School of Humanities
    BEGC -109 Mary Shelley: Life and Works British Romantic Indira Gandhi Literature National Open University School of Humanities Block 4 MARY SHELLEY: FRANKENSTEIN Unit 1 Mary Shelley: Life and Works 189 Unit 2 Frankenstein: A Gothic Novel 203 Unit 3 Frankenstein: Summary and Analysis 213 Unit 4 Frankenstein: Major Themes 229 187 Mary Shelley: Frankenstein BLOCK INTRODUCTION This Block will introduce you to one of the important After the completion of this block, you will be introduced toMary Shelley(1797-1851), also known as Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, a British novelist. You will • get introduced to the gothic tradition. • be familiarised with the major influential factors on the Gothic with special reference to Mary Shelley. • comprehend her effects worldwide. • trace her impacts on the later generations. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The material (pictures and passages) we have used is purely for educational purposes. Every effort has been made to trace the copyright holders of material reproduced in this book. Should any infringement have occurred, the publishers and editors apologize and will be pleased to make the necessary corrections in future editions of this book. 188 UNIT 1 Mary SHELLEY: LIFE AND WORKS Mary Shelley: Life and Works Structure 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Infancy And Early Years 1.3 Challenge Preadolescence 1.4 Teenage 1.5 Mary's Relocation 1.6 Love Life 1.7 Mary's Journey To London 1.8 Mary and Her Personal Calamities 1.9 Mary's First Novel Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus 1.10 Story of "Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus 1.11 Other Works of Mary Shelley 1.12 Last Stage of Mary Shelley's Life 1.13 Let Us Sum Up 1.14 Questions and Answer Keys 1.15 Suggested Readings 1.0 OBJECTIVES It is evident that the life account of a famous novelist is a storehouse of facts and events which are essential to grasp the background of the author and the literary works.
    [Show full text]
  • John Keats 1 John Keats
    John Keats 1 John Keats John Keats Portrait of John Keats by William Hilton. National Portrait Gallery, London Born 31 October 1795 Moorgate, London, England Died 23 February 1821 (aged 25) Rome, Italy Occupation Poet Alma mater King's College London Literary movement Romanticism John Keats (/ˈkiːts/; 31 October 1795 – 23 February 1821) was an English Romantic poet. He was one of the main figures of the second generation of Romantic poets along with Lord Byron and Percy Bysshe Shelley, despite his work only having been in publication for four years before his death.[1] Although his poems were not generally well received by critics during his life, his reputation grew after his death, so that by the end of the 19th century he had become one of the most beloved of all English poets. He had a significant influence on a diverse range of poets and writers. Jorge Luis Borges stated that his first encounter with Keats was the most significant literary experience of his life.[2] The poetry of Keats is characterised by sensual imagery, most notably in the series of odes. Today his poems and letters are some of the most popular and most analysed in English literature. Biography Early life John Keats was born in Moorgate, London, on 31 October 1795, to Thomas and Frances Jennings Keats. There is no clear evidence of his exact birthplace.[3] Although Keats and his family seem to have marked his birthday on 29 October, baptism records give the date as the 31st.[4] He was the eldest of four surviving children; his younger siblings were George (1797–1841), Thomas (1799–1818), and Frances Mary "Fanny" (1803–1889) who eventually married Spanish author Valentín Llanos Gutiérrez.[5] Another son was lost in infancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Shelley's Poetic Inspiration and Its Two Sources: the Ideals of Justice and Beauty
    SHELLEY'S POETIC INSPIRATION AND ITS TWO SOURCES: THE IDEALS OF JUSTICE AND BEAUTY. by Marie Guertin •IBtlOrHEQf*' * "^ «« 11 Ottawa ^RYMtt^ Thesis presented to the School of Graduate Studies of the University of Ottawa as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in English Literature Department of English Ottawa, Canada, 1977 , Ottawa, Canada, 1978 UMI Number: EC55769 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform EC55769 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 SHELLEY'S POETIC INSPIRATION AND ITS TWO SOURCES: THE IDEALS OF JUSTICE AND BEAUTY by Marie Guertin ABSTRACT The purpose of this dissertation is to show that most of Shelley's poetry can be better understood when it is related: (1) to each of the two ideals which constantly inspired Shelley in his life, thought and poetry; (2) to the increasing unity which bound these two ideals so closely together that they finally appeared, through most of his mature philosophical and poetical Works, as two aspects of the same Ideal.
    [Show full text]
  • In PDF Format
    THOMAS HARDY'S LIBRARY AT MAX GATE: CATALOGUE OF AN ATTEMPTED RECONSTRUCTION Michael Millgate Abbott, Claude Colleer. Miss Bedell and Other Poems. London, 1924. Bookplate; pres. ins. from author. [Maggs Bros. 664/1] Abercrombie, Lascelles. The Epic. London: Martin Secker, n.d. [1914] Bookplate; light marking and v. light annotation. (Taylor, Language, 317; Wreden 11/95) [Texas] ---. Interludes and Poems. London: John Lane The Bodley Head, 1908. Bookplate; pres. ins. from J. Lane. (MG Sale/217; Maggs 664/2; Holmes 1989 List/1, 40/156; Reese 122/1) [William Reese 134/459] ---. Thomas Hardy: A Critical Study. London: Martin Secker, 1912. TH signature. Export 287/64 reports another copy (with pres. ins. from Abercrombie to his mother), but MG provenance doubtful. [DCM] About, Edmond. The Man With the Broken Ear. New York: Holt, 1873. TH signature; v. lightly annotated. Trans. by Henry Holt of About's L'Homme à l'oreille cassée, first pub. 1867; this copy, in Holt's 'Leisure Hour' series, presumably a gift to TH from Holt. [Elkin Mathews Folio 3/31] Adams, Ernest. The Elements of the English Language. Revised by J. F. Davis. London: George Bell and Sons, 1892. ('25th edition') Bookplate; annotated inside back cover with examples of split infinitives by Browning, Bagehot, and Byron. (Stonehill ex-cat. 1939) [Samuel Hynes] [Adams, Henry]. Democracy: An American Novel. London: Ward, Lock, n.d. Bookplate. [First Edition Bookshop 33/97] Addison, Joseph. The Free Holder or Political Essays. London, 1744. Bookplate. [David Magee 23/197] 2 ---. The Tatler. 2 vols. London, 1777. Bookplate; title-page of vol.
    [Show full text]