DOCSLIB.ORG

London, Ontario December 1997

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DIALOGUES OF DESIRE: INTERTEXTUAL NARUTION IN THE WORKS OF MARY SHELLEY AND WILLIAM GODWIN Ranita Chatterjee Department of English Submitted in pzrtial fulfilrnent of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Graduate Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario December 1997 O Ranita Chatterjee 1998 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie SeMces services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence dowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distniute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfichelnlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thése ni des extraits substantiels may be p~tedor otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent êeimprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT Using Julia Kristeva's concept of intertextuality and Lacan's theories of desire, this study ârgues that there is a dialogic process that generates and circulates an "excess" of meaning that conscripts the desires of future readers in and between William Godwin's and Mary Shelley's fictional and non-fictional writings. Beginning with a critique of the predominantly psychobiograpnic readings of the literary output of this father-daughter pair, my study posits the notion of "psychonarration," A term of my own invention, psychonarration describes the intertextual connections that arise from within an intimate collective, such as the father-daughter relationship of Godwin and Shelley, to produce varied emergent discursive identities for each member. Psychonarration foregrounds the psychic, yet collective and dialogic constructions of identity through narratives. 1 frame my study with readings of what 1 argue are Godwin's and Shelley's most personal, yet textually constructed works: the former's recollections of and tribute to Mary Wollstonecraft in Memoirs of the Author of "A Vindication of The Riahts of Wornan" (1798), a work that publicly wrestles with the literary, political, and emotional legacies of a lover, wife, and mother that significantly provides Shelley with the only details of a mother she never knew; and the latter's originally unpublished fictional autobiographical confession of father- daughter incest in Mathilda (cornposed in 1819). 1 suggest that while Memoirs transposes Mary Wollstonecraft from historicsl existence to discursive construction through the operation of Godwin's desire for public sympathy for his loss, this particular rendition of Wollstonecraft is revisited both in his later domestic novels and in Shelley's fiction. Through readings of the repetition of narrative iii patterns, structures, characters, themes, and diction, my study suggests that Godwin's Caleb Williams, Mernoirs, Fleetwood, and his last novei Deloraino, and Shelley's Frankenstein, Mathilda, "The Mourner, " and her last novel Falkner, engage in different textual dialogues that contest and confirm the portrayal of familial relationships, especially of father-daughter intimacy in a family without a mother. In so doing, 1 suggest that there is a complicated, libidinal interaction between the historical iives of authors and the textual inscriptions of these histories. Keywords: Romanticism, Romantic literature, Gothic novels, Godwin, Shelley, Wollstonecraft, Kristeva, Lacan, Freud, Foucault, Feminist Theory, Psychoanalysis, Queer Theory, Intertextuality, Desire, Autonarration, Homoeroticism, Incest, Father-Daughter Relationships. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS With deep gratitude and respect, I thank my supervisor Professor Tilottama Rajan and my second reader Professor Elizabeth D. Harvey for their guidance, insignt, and unfailing enthusiasm and patience for a project that survived arduous dislocations. 1 am also grateful for a doctoral fellowship in the early stages of this dissertation from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 1 am indebted to my parents, sister, and brother who through their own examples of academic excellence sustained my desires to see this project to its completion. Finally, 1 thank Tomo Hattori not only for inspiring me with his academic success, but also for pxoviding astute criticism, intellectuâl conversations, and personal support from the beginning. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Certificate of examination ii Abstract iîi Ac knowledgements v Table of Contents vi Introduction: Intertextuality, Psychonarration, and Desire in the Godwin-Shelley family "The Most Hurtful Performance": Shelley's Mernories and Godwin's Memoirs of Wollstonecraft 18 Political Anxiety: William Godwin, Caleb Williams and Masculine Desire 85 "A mummy again endued with animation": The (Re)production of Desire in Shelley's Frankenstein Conclusion: "An eternal mental union": Mathilda and the Circulation of Desire in Shelley's and Godwin's Writings Works Cited and Consulted Vita Introduction Intertextuality, Psychonarration, and Desire in the Godwin-Shelley family' Among the Godwins and the Shelleys, Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin Shelley has only recently begun to enjoy the scholarly attention she deserves.: Significantly, with the critical rediscovery of her writings, especially those published after Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818, 1831), Shelley's relationship to her father William Godwin is once again being examined. There is much available biographical and autobiographical material on the lives of Godwin and Shelley, as well as many critical l Unless otherwise stated, "Shelley" will be used to refer to Mary Shelley throughout this study. Although there has always been a steady critical concern with Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, there are now book-length appraisals and critical essays on her other writings. 1 believe, along with critics such as Tilottama Rajan ("Mary Shelley's" 43), that the republication of Mathilda and the reissuing of The Last Man have contributed to this renewed interest in Mary Shelley and her corpus. Mathilda has been reprinted in two anthologies: see Bennett's and Robinson's The Marv Shellev Reader, and Todd. In addition to the Hugh Luke edition of The Last Man that has been reissued by Anne K. Mellor, there are two new editions of this novel: Morton D. Paley's 1994 and Anne McWhirts 1996 editions. For some of the more influential criticism on Mary Shelley see: William Veeder's 1986 Marv Shellev and Frankenstein: The Fate of Androavnv, Anne Mellor's 1988 Marv Shellev: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters, Jane Blurnberg's 1993 Marv Shellev's Earlv Novels: "This Child of Imagination and Miserv," the 1993 collection of essays The Other Marv Shellev: Bevond Frankenstein, and Katherine C. Hill-Miller's 1995 "Mv Hideous Proaenv": Marv Shellev. William Godwin, and the Father-Dauahter Relationshi~. The recent 1997 collection of essays Iconoclastie ûe~artures: plam Shellev after Frankenstein: Essavs in Honor of the Bicentenarv of Marv Shellev's Birth attests to the growing interest in Mary Shelley's entire corpus and includes a useful biographical census of Shelley's fiction other than Frankenstein. readings at least of Godwin's Thinas As Thev Are; or The Fdventures of Caleb Williams (1794, 1797, 1816, 1831) and Shelley's Frankenstein.' Nevertheless, there have been no full-length studies that consider the relationship between the father's and the daughterfs texts. With the influential publication in 1988 of Anne Mellor's Marv Shellev: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters, Shelley's persona1 relationships, especially with Godwin, became the foundation for criticism of her fictional works in highly suggestive ways. For both in uncovering the vast range of Shelley's corpus and in rejuvenating her literary reptation, Mellor constructs Mary Shelley as a literary daughter and a woman writer, albeit one who is committed to "the preservation of the bourgeois family" because of her own "childhood deprived of a loving nuclear family" (xii).' This acknowledgement of the relevance of Mary Shelley's familial context for her literary production, particularly of the influence of her father, has also contributed to the recent study by Katherine C. Hill-Miller, "Mv Hideous Proaenv" : Marv Shellev, Wil1.iarn Godwin. and the Father- In fact, while studies of Godwin's entire corpus are rare, there are several recent biographies of him. See Don Locke's 1980 A Fantasv of Reason: The Life and Thouaht of William Godwin, Peter Marshall's 1984 William Godwin, and William St Clair's 1989 The Godwins and the Shel levs: The Bioara~hvof A Familv, which, despite its title, is a biography primarily of Godwin. ' Because Mellor's study was the first major discussion of al1 of Shelley's writings, some subsequent critics of Mary Shelley have felt compelled either to acknowledge or to refute Mellor's readings of Shelley's works within and through her life experiences. Hence, for instance, Kate Ferguson Ellis in a chapter on Frankenstein in her study The Contested Castle: Gothic Novels and the Subversion of Domestic Ideoloav (1989) persuasively argues that far
Recommended publications
  • To Teach Every Principle of the Infidels and Republicans? William Godwin Through His Children's Books

    To Teach Every Principle of the Infidels and Republicans? William Godwin Through His Children's Books

    To Teach Every Principle of the Infidels and Republicans? William Godwin Through His Children's Books John-Erik Hansson Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, 23 November 2018 European University Institute Department of History and Civilization To Teach Every Principle of the Infidels and Republicans? William Godwin Through His Children's Books John-Erik Hansson Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Ann Thomson, EUI (Supervisor) Stéphane Van Damme, EUI Pamela Clemit, Queen Mary, University of London (External Advisor) Gregory Claeys, Royal Holloway, University of London © John-Erik Hansson, 2018 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Researcher declaration to accompany the submission of written work Department of History and Civilization - Doctoral Programme I John-Erik Hansson certify that I am the author of the work 'To Teach Every Principle of the Infidels and Republicans?' I have presented for examination for the Ph.D. at the European University Institute. I also certify that this is solely my own original work, other than where I have clearly indicated, in this declaration and in the thesis, that it is the work of others. I warrant that I have obtained all the permissions required for using any material from other copyrighted publications. I certify that this work complies with the Code of Ethics in Academic Research issued by the European University Institute (IUE 332/2/10 (CA 297).
  • On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- Says, Moral and Political, 2 Vols

    On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- Says, Moral and Political, 2 Vols

    Notes Introduction 1. Robert Southey, “On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- says, Moral and Political, 2 vols. (1817; London: John Murray, 1832), II, 82. The identity of Junius remained a mystery, and even Edmund Burke was suspected. For an argument that he was Sir Philip Francis, see Alvar Ellegård, Who Was Junius? (The Hague, 1962). 2. Byron, “The Vision of Judgment” in Lord Byron: The Complete Poetical Works, ed. Jerome J. McGann and Barry Weller, 7 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980–92), VI, 309–45. 3. M. H. Abrams, Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Ro- mantic Literature (New York: W. W. Norton, 1971), p. 13. 4. See Anne K. Mellor, English Romantic Irony (Cambridge: Harvard Univer- sity Press, 1980). 5. Jerome J. McGann, The Romantic Ideology: A Critical Investigation (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1983), pp. 23–24. 6. Jerome J. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), p. 39. 7. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge, p. 39. 8. McGann, “Literary Pragmatics and the Editorial Horizon,” in Devils and Angels: Textual Editing and Literary Theory, ed. Philip Cohen (Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1991), pp. 1–21 (13). 9. Marilyn Butler, “Satire and the Images of Self in the Romantic Period: The Long Tradition of Hazlitt’s Liber Amoris,” in English Satire and the Satiric Tradition, ed. Claude Rawson (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984), 209–25 (209). 10. Stuart Curran, Poetic Form and British Romanticism (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 12–13. 11. Gary Dyer, British Satire and the Politics of Style, 1789–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
  • Frankenstein As Educational Thought on the Modern Problem of Terror

    Frankenstein As Educational Thought on the Modern Problem of Terror

    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MONSTROUS MISEDUCATION: FRANKENSTEIN AS EDUCATIONAL THOUGHT ON THE MODERN PROBLEM OF TERROR A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By KRISTEN OGILVIE HOLZER Norman, Oklahoma 2016 MONSTROUS MISEDUCATION: FRANKENSTEIN AS EDUCATIONAL THOUGHT ON THE MODERN PROBLEM OF TERROR A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND POLICY STUDIES BY _____________________________ Dr. Susan Laird, Chair _____________________________ Dr. John Covaleskie _____________________________ Dr. Angela Urick _____________________________ Dr. Michele Eodice _____________________________ Dr. Robert Con Davis-Undiano © Copyright by KRISTEN OGILVIE HOLZER 2016 All Rights Reserved. DEDICATION I dedicate this work to the children among whom I have had the privilege of learning, including my two children, Keely Pate Holzer and Liam Reed Holzer. My fondest hopes lie in their future and the possibility that this scholarship might contribute in some small way toward the “cultural wealth” they will inherit. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank my mother, Marilyn Bailey Ogilvie, who has supported and encouraged me as a scholar, a mentor, and a friend. Words are inadequate to account for the debt of gratitude this work, and all of my work, owes my mother. By her example and courage, my sister, Martha Kay Ogilvie, has always pushed me to realize my potential. My brother, William Woodworth Ogilvie, has never stopped teasing or believing in me and I thank him for his humor and faith. I am grateful to my spouse, Michael Reed Holzer, for the pride he has always taken in my little victories. That pride made me believe I could finish what I started.
  • Frankenstein's Theatrical Doppelgänger

    Frankenstein's Theatrical Doppelgänger

    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013-08-27 From Prometheus to Presumption: Frankenstein's Theatrical Doppelgänger Reid, Brittany Lee Alexandra Reid, B. L. (2013). From Prometheus to Presumption: Frankenstein's Theatrical Doppelgänger (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/26236 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/894 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY From Prometheus to Presumption: Frankenstein’s Theatrical Doppelgänger by Brittany Reid A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH CALGARY, ALBERTA AUGUST, 2013 © Brittany Reid 2013 ii Abstract This thesis examines the Doppelgänger relationship between Victor Frankenstein and the Creature, as it is characterized through both Frankenstein and its first theatrical adaptation. With a specific focus on Richard Brinsley Peake’s 1823 gothic melodrama, Presumption; or, The Fate of Frankenstein I unpack how the novel’s cross-medium adaptation leads to a changed conception of the relationship of its central characters. In Frankenstein, Victor is the focal figure and acts as the Creature’s dominant counterpart. However, the characters’ cross-medium adaptation from page to stage inverts this Doppelgänger relationship from Shelley’s initial conception in the novel.
  • Frankenstein, Matilda, and the Legacies of Godwin and Wollstonecraft

    Frankenstein, Matilda, and the Legacies of Godwin and Wollstonecraft

    2 PAMELA CLEMIT Frankenstein, Matilda, and the legacies of Godwin and Wollstonecraft [My mother’s] greatness of soul & my father high talents have perpetually reminded me that I ought to degenerate as little as I could from those from whom I derived my being . my chief merit must always be derived, first from the glory these wonderful beings have shed [?around] me, & then for the enthusiasm I have for excellence & the ardent admiration I feel for those who sacrifice themselves for the public good. (L ii 4) In this letter of September 1827 to Frances Wright, the Scottish-born author and social reformer, Mary Shelley reveals just how much she felt her life and thought to be shaped by the social and political ideals of her parents, William Godwin, the leading radical philosopher of the 1790s, and his wife, the proto-feminist writer Mary Wollstonecraft. The multiple liter- ary, political, and philosophical influences of Godwin and Wollstonecraft may be traced in all six of Mary Shelley’s full-length novels, as well as in her tales, biographies, essays, and other shorter writings. Yet while she con- sistently wrote within the framework established by her parents’ concerns, she was no mere imitator of their works. Writing with an awareness of how French revolutionary politics had unfolded through the Napoleonic era, Mary Shelley extends and reformulates the many-sided legacies of Godwin and Wollstonecraft in extreme, imaginatively arresting ways. Those legacies received their most searching reappraisal in Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818), Mary Shelley’s remarkable first novel, and were re- examined a year later in Matilda, a novella telling the story of incestuous love between father and daughter, which, though it remained unpublished until 1959, has now become one of her best-known works.
  • Romantic Medicine and the Poetics of Palliation

    Romantic Medicine and the Poetics of Palliation

    Romantic Medicine and the Poetics of Palliation by Brittany Pladek A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English University of Toronto © Copyright by Brittany Pladek (2013) Romantic Medicine and the Poetics of Palliation Brittany Pladek Doctor of Philosophy Department of English University of Toronto 2013 Abstract This study uses the interdisciplinary lens of Romantic medical ethics to reconsider received ideas about the therapeutic power of Romantic poetry. Studies of literature and medicine in the long nineteenth century have generally considered disease the era’s main medical symbol; they have likewise considered holistic “healing” its major model for poetry’s therapeutic effect, following Geoffrey Hartman’s description of Wordsworth’s ability to “heal the wound of self.” Without denying the importance of these paradigms, my work explores alternate foci: pain instead of disease, and palliation instead of healing. In Britain, professional medical ethics were first codified during the Romantic period in response to a variety of medical and social advances. But because of Romantic medicine’s curative uncertainty and utilitarian intolerance for pain, its ethicists turned from cure to palliation to describe a doctor’s primary duty toward his patients. My study argues that this palliative ethic was taken up by Romantic literary writers to describe their own work. By engaging with contemporary medical ethics treatises such as John Gregory’s 1770 Lectures on the Duties and Qualifications of a Physician and Thomas Percival’s 1803 Medical Ethics, I explore four Romantic authors’ struggle to find an appropriate medical model for their work’s therapeutic benefits.
  • Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin Shelley and Frankenstein : a Chronology

    Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin Shelley and Frankenstein : a Chronology

    Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin Shelley and Frankenstein : A Chronology PETER DALE SCOTT 1797 August 30. Mary born to William and his wife, Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, who dies from postpartum hemorrhage September 10. 1801 December 21. William Godwin remarries a widow, Mary Jane Clairmont, who brings to the Godwin family her children Charles, aged seven, and Jane (later known as Claire), aged four. 1812 November 11. Mary's first meeting with Percy Bysshe Shelley. Mary resides with Baxter family in Dundee, 1812-14. 1814 May 5. Renewed contact in London with Percy Bysshe Shelley. July 28. Percy Shelley elopes with Mary and Claire Clairmont from the Godwin household to France and Switzerland. August 27. Two days after renting a house for six months at Brun- nen, Lake of Lucerne, the Shelley ménage abruptly depart for England. September 13. Return to London. Percy beleaguered by creditors and bailiffs. November 30. Harriet, Percy's wife, gives birth to her second child, Charles. 1815 January. Erotic correspondence and involvement between Mary and T. J. Hogg. xvii A Chronology February 22. Mary gives birth to premature female child, which dies March 6. March 19. (Mary's Journal) "Dream that my little baby came to life again; that it had only been cold, and that we rubbed it before the fire, and it lived." August. Mary and Percy, without Claire, settle at Bishopsgate, Windsor. 1816 January 24. A son William is born to Mary and Percy. May 3. Percy and Mary, with Claire, leave for Switzerland, arriving ten days later at Geneva, where they meet up with Byron and Polidori.
  • Betty T. Bennett Papers Byron Society of America Collection Finding Aid

    Betty T. Bennett Papers Byron Society of America Collection Finding Aid

    Betty T. Bennett Papers Byron Society of America Collection Finding Aid Creator: Bennett, Betty T., 1935-2006 Title: Betty T. Bennett Papers Dates: 1970-2005 Abstract: Correspondence, research materials, writings, and reproductions documenting the scholarly work of noted Mary Shelley and Romantic era scholar, Betty Bennett. Extent: 100 boxes, 50 linear feet Language: English Repository: Drew University Library, Madison NJ Biographical Note Betty T. Bennett (1935-2006) was a noted and well-respected educator and researcher whose main focus included work on the life and experiences of famed English author Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. Bennett was instrumental in sharing Mary Shelley’s works through a lifelong study and numerous publications. Bennett’s work with Mary Shelley and other Romantic writers in the Shelley, Keats, and Byron circle began in the 1970s. Bennett was a graduate of Brooklyn College, where she received her BA (1960), as well as New York University where she earned an MA (1962) and PhD (1970). Her doctoral dissertation focused on British War Poetry, an edited work that was later published as British War Poetry in the Age of Romanticism, 1793-1815 (1976). After NYU, Bennett received an academic teaching position at SUNY, Stony Brook, where she first began to work on the political and social implications of Mary Shelley’s most famous work, Frankenstein. Bennett wrote a pioneering essay on Mary Shelley’s political philosophy in 1978, which brought her to the forefront of the academic literary world. Shortly after, Bennett was named dean of the School of Liberal Arts and Sciences and acting provost of Pratt Institute in Brooklyn, where she worked until 1985.
  • The Unfamiliar Shelley

    The Unfamiliar Shelley

    THE UNFAMILIAR SHELLEY Proof Copy in gratitude for his major contribution to the understanding of Shelley To Don Reiman Proof Copy The Unfamiliar Shelley Edited by ALAN M. WEINBERG University of South Africa, RSA TIMOTHY WEBB University of Bristol, UK Proof Copy © Alan M. Weinberg and Timothy Webb 2008 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Alan M. Weinberg and Timothy Webb have asserted their moral right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the editors of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Gower House Suite 420 Croft Road 101 Cherry Street Aldershot Burlington, VT 05401-4405 Hampshire GU11 3HR USA England www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data The unfamiliar Shelley. – (The nineteenth century series) 1. Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792–1822 – Criticism and interpretation I. Webb, Timothy II. Weinberg, Alan M. (Alan Mendel) 821.7 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The unfamiliar Shelley / edited by Timothy Webb and Alan M. Weinberg. p. cm. – (The nineteenth century series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7546-6390-4 (alk. paper) 1. Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792–1822–Criticism and interpretation. I. Webb, Timothy. II. Weinberg, Alan M. (Alan Mendel) PR5438.U64 2008 821'.7–dc22 2007052262 ISBN 978-0-7546-6390-4Proof Copy Contents General Editors’ Preface vii List of Illustrations ix Notes on Contributors xi Acknowledgements xv List of Abbreviations xvii Editorial Note xix Introduction 1 Timothy Webb and Alan M.
  • William Godwin in His Letters.', in Repossessing the Romantic Past

    William Godwin in His Letters.', in Repossessing the Romantic Past

    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 03 August 2009 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Clemit, P. A. (2006) 'Holding Proteus : William Godwin in his letters.', in Repossessing the romantic past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 98-115. Further information on publisher's website: http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521858663 Publisher's copyright statement: c Cambridge University Press 2006 Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk CHAPTER 5 Holding Proteus: William Godwin in his letters Pamt!a Cumit The 19805 and 19905 saw a transformation in the reading of prose litera­ ture of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. This transformation was pioneered by enterprising academic editors, working closely with the forward-thinking London publishing house Pickering and Chano, and began with the publication ofa series ofmulti-volume scholarly editions of prose writers eminent in their own day, but largely unavailable to modern readers.
  • A Creative Biography of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley Through the Lens of Her Interpersonal Relationships

    A Creative Biography of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley Through the Lens of Her Interpersonal Relationships

    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 2-26-2021 Mary: A Creative Biography of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley through the Lens of Her Interpersonal Relationships Julien-Pierre E. Campbell Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Part of the Fiction Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Campbell, Julien-Pierre E., "Mary: A Creative Biography of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley through the Lens of Her Interpersonal Relationships" (2021). University Honors Theses. Paper 980. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.1004 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Campbell 1 Mary A Creative Biography of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley Through the Lens of her Interpersonal Relationships By Julien-Pierre “JP” Campbell Campbell 2 Percy Shelley 27 June 1814 Night falls slowly around us. The sky has rioted with all of God’s colors and at last succumbed to the pale blue of the gloaming. He stares hard at the sky. Who can know the exact thoughts that are stirred behind that princely brow? His eyes bear the faraway look I’ve come to associate with brilliance. He’s composing. Perhaps I stay quiet long enough -- Lord knows our ​ ​ sepulchral companions will -- he will speak verse. I’m sure I could observe him for rapturous eons. His cheeks are flushed and his curls are mussed.
  • Newcastle University E-Prints

    Newcastle University E-Prints

    Newcastle University e-prints Date deposited: 19 January 2010 Version of file: Author final Peer Review Status: Peer reviewed Citation for published item: Rossington M. Republican histories and memories: The Shelleys, Switzerland and Geneva . In: Cossy, V; Kapossy, B; Whatmore, R, ed. Genève, lieu d’Angleterre 1725-1814 / Geneva, an English Enclave 1725- 1814 .Geneva:Slatkine,2009, pp. 307-325. Further information on publisher website: http://www.slatkine.com/ Publishers copyright statement: The definitive version of this article, published by Slatkine Publishing, 2009 http://www.slatkine.com/ Use Policy: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not for profit purposes provided that: • A full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • A link is made to the metadata record in DRO • The full text is not change in any way. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Robinson Library, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne. NE1 7RU. Tel. 0191 222 6000 Republican histories and memories: The Shelleys, Switzerland and Geneva 1 This essay explores the significance of Switzerland and the Genevan republic in History of a Six Weeks’ Tour Through A Part of France, Switzerland, Germany, and Holland: With Letters Descriptive of A Sail Round the Lake of Geneva and of the Glaciers of Chamouni , an account, by Mary Shelley and Percy Shelley, of two visits to the Continent in 1814 and 1816, prepared in the late summer of 1817 for anonymous publication by Thomas Hookham and the Ollier brothers in London later that year 2.