DOCSLIB.ORG

Bridgeville Comprehensive Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

-Est. 1901- Bridgeville Borough Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction Community Development Objectives ........................................................................ 1-1 Goal of the Comprehensive Plan .............................................................................. 1-2 What is the Bridgeville Borough Comprehensive Plan? .......................................... 1-3 Timeline ..................................................................................................................... 1-4 Interrelationship Statement .......................................................................................1-5 Contiguous Municipalities Statement ....................................................................... 1-6 Public Participation ..................................................................................................1-6 Capital Improvements Program ............................................................................... 1-8 Implementation Plan ................................................................................................. 1-13 Section 2—Community History ..................................................................................... 2-1 Section 3—Demographics .............................................................................................. 3-1 Section 4—Community Amenities ................................................................................ 4-1 Section 5—Transportation ............................................................................................. 5-1 Section 6—Housing ......................................................................................................... 6-1 Section 7—Economic Development ............................................................................. 7-1 Section 8—Parks and Recreation ................................................................................. 8-1 Section 9—Natural Resources ...................................................................................... 9-1 Section 10—Land Use ..................................................................................................... 10-1 Appendices References ................................................................................................................. A Recreation Assessment ..............................................................................................B Public Input ...............................................................................................................C SWOT Results .....................................................................................................i CIE Results .........................................................................................................ii Goals Ranking Results .......................................................................................iii Public Comment Form .......................................................................................iv Public Survey Results .........................................................................................v Economic Development Workshop Results ........................................................vi Chartiers Valley High School Results ................................................................vii Project Newsletters ................................................................................................... D Funding Sources and Technical Assistance ..............................................................E Bridgeville Borough is located along Capitalize on the existing the Interstate 79 corridor in Allegheny transportation network and proximity County approximately 15 miles to major highways and public southwest of the City of Pittsburgh. transportation providers, while The borough is a part of the providing a safe and pedestrian Southwestern Pennsylvania region, friendly atmosphere. which has a rich industrial and ethnic heritage. Encourage residents and visitors alike to visit downtown by improving The comprehensive plan is the only the existing parking. public document that describes the community as a whole in terms of its Develop innovative strategies to complex and mutually supporting capitalize on the existing housing networks. The plan contains policy stock and provide more housing statements, developed by the options such as garden apartments, community and adopted by its townhouses, and condominiums and officials, which are used to support allow for mixed-use commercial and community decisions and anticipate residential districts. future conditions. The Bridgeville Borough Work with surrounding municipalities Comprehensive Plan has been to provide coordinated public prepared in accordance with the services and infrastructure to ensure Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning the highest quality of life for borough Code subsequent amendments. residents. Although the plan is not a legally binding document, it is the official Promote an aesthetically pleasing statement for future development in downtown environment to attract new the community. The following were businesses. identified as the community development objectives through input Foster better relationships with local from the public at large, steering industries to promote a safe and committee and borough officials: healthy environment for borough and surrounding municipalities’ residents. Improve, update, and maintain the current recreation facilities and Preserve the historic integrity of services available to meet the Bridgeville Borough and promote changing needs of the borough while existing and potential historic sites. providing better access to these facilities for all residents. Bridgeville Borough Comprehensive Plan Update HISTORY & COMMUNITY CHARACTER Incorporated as a borough on March 11, 1901, Bridgeville has celebrated over 100 years of history. The 1920’s saw a “Build – Boost – Beautify” mentality emerge for Bridgeville. The Bridgeville Chamber of Commerce set the tone with this motto, and the catchphrase “make your home town an ideal place in which to live, work and play”. Over the course of the next 80 years, Bridgeville would feel the effects of the changing social and economic composition, such as the consolidation of public schools, the construction of I-79, and the decline of manufacturing industries. Bridgeville coped with these social and economic trends by slowly evolving from a vital business center into a pleasant residential area for families that retains a strong commercial flavor. The “Build – Boost – Beautify” motto of the 1920’s was replaced with the current motto of “It’s a nice place to live.” Many buildings constructed before or around the turn of the 20th Century still exist and are in fine condition. These homes and businesses serve to impart a sense of character and elected officials would be wise to use these structures as the basis for future streetscape planning. Bridgeville has a very active historical society and community association. These local organizations have published several yearbooks (the most recent for the 2001 centennial celebration) celebrating the borough’s history. The borough should work with these organizations to identify the historic or cultural resources that should be preserved. Funding is available from the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission (PHMC) to non-profit organizations and local governments for historic preservation, structural Historic Railroad Car at Library rehabilitation, and restoration of historic properties. As the project area is located along roadways that experience significant amounts of traffic, there are numerous opportunities to increase awareness of the borough by creating gateways. Thematic improvements to the downtown streetscape would improve the appearance and encourage individuals to shop in the business district. As stated in the plan, there are many tools available for municipal officials that can be used to foster community character and protect important historic and cultural assets. As these steps are taken, the borough will see benefits both socially (as community pride increases) and economically Washington Avenue Shops (with increased property values and an infusion of spending by visitors). The following action steps have been identified as priorities for the history and community character element: 1. Hold a workshop with the Pennsylvania Downtown Center to discuss issues regarding the appearance of the central business district and possible programs to implement 2. Create a Business Improvement District 3. Complete a streetscape plan for the Washington Avenue Corridor 4. Implement design guidelines in the business district 5. Establish gateways at vehicular and pedestrian entry points 6. Establish a shade tree commission and enact a shade tree ordinance 7. Study the financial feasibility of hiring a Main Street Manager 8. Conduct an inventory of historic resources and identify those suitable for heritage tourism efforts 9. Obtain funding for the restoration and rehabilitation of historic properties 10. Provide information to individuals interested in obtaining tax credits for historic preservation activities 11. Acquire preservation or façade easements on historic properties 12. Provide zoning bonuses for the preservation of historic sites and structures 13. Identify a location to house the historical society Bridgeville Borough Comprehensive Plan Update COMMUNITY FACILITIES The provision of community facilities,
Recommended publications
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx

    Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx

    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide

    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide

    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
  • Aw April 2013

    Aw April 2013

    )HEUXDU\0DUFKZZZDOOHJKHQ\ZHVWPDJD]LQHFRP )URPWKH PUBLISHER & EDITORS 7KURXJK'LIIHUHQW(\HV My New Year’s Day started off in a rather Going into public bathrooms was often difficult. Some bathroom doors unusual fashion. I spent the morning at the are so heavy; it is next to impossible to open them with one hand while hospital having x-rays of my foot. Much to trying to navigate one’s balance and keeping two crutches under the arms. my chagrin, I learned I had broken it the night Some bathrooms for the handicapped are not equipped as they should be, before in a freak twist of my ankle. with doors in some instances opening inward (how do those with a Thus began a two-month journey of using wheelchair manage that?), or lack of paper supplies, leaving one with crutches, wearing an air boot, and staying off difficulty in maneuvering without the necessary materials to get the job my foot for what most people consider daily done. living activities, such as walking, driving, and There were other situations I discovered, too. Some public places do standing. not have ramps or flat access to their venues. Someone with a broken foot To be sure, this experience opened my eyes or leg can’t access these places. We learned that we had to carefully plot in ways I would never have considered. out our moves before we went anywhere. Getting up stairs was a challenge. Getting showered posed I am finally back on two feet and walking fine. This experience, difficulties. Getting up in the middle of the night to use the facilities however, showed me how much more we have to do to help those with meant all hands on deck, literally, while shuffling carefully to the physical handicaps.
  • Chartiers City 1977

    Chartiers City 1977

    , An Atlas of the Chartiers City Neighborhood of Pittsburgh 1977 f CHAR TIERS CITY I UNIVERSITY CENTER fOR Un8AN RESEARCH 1209-0, Cathedral of learning UNIVERSITY Cr:: FlTiS2LJ~G H University of Pittsburgh 249 NORTH CRAIG STREET Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 \ I'mSBURGH. PeNNSYLVANIA 15260 Phone: (412) 624-3465 PITTSBURGH NEIGHBORHOOD ATLAS GOVERNING BOARD R OGER AH L BAAN DT. JR. STAFF Univer.ity 01 P lt"bu r ~. Sc hool 01 S ocl, 1 Work Ch llrperlon JAMES VALLAS Wendell D. Jordan (East Liberty-Lemington-Lincoln) S hady. lde Vlce-Cheirper. on Margaret K. Charny (Squirrel Hill) BARBARA KELL Y Julia Whitener (Mexican War Streets) Perry-Hilltop Secretl rv Millofred Russell (Homestead, Pa.) TERRY WOODCOCK Gerald S. Oswalt (Schenley Heights) Squ lrr,. HIli T r ...ur • • Katherine Knorr (East Liberty) RICHARO ARMSTEAO John Zingaro (Shadyside) Hili OIu rlC I Dan Baskin J OSEPH BORKOWSKI Lawarancavllla Vicky Leap O A NIEL CHAPPELL Howard Williams Hili OIltrlet Ronald ~adzy MARY CO YNE West End Tony Gary JIM CUNNINGHAM Mary Shea Shady.lda MARY LOU DANIEL West End SUPPORTIVE INSTITUTIONS J ESE OEL GRE Hili Olurlet WILLIAM P. GALLAGHER Pittsburgh Neighborhood Alliance G reenflald Center for Urban Research of the Univ. 'of Pgh. MARY HALL Squ lr ..1 HIli School of Social Work of the Univ. of Pgh. ROSE JEWELL Architect Workshop Shady,lde City Council of the City of Pgh. GABOR KISH Elliott Allegheny County Department of Elections ROBERT "BLUE" MARTIN Haulwood ACTION-Housing. Inc. TH O MAS MURPHY Department of City Planning of the City of Pgh. " a rry Hilltop Southwestern Penna.
  • Anatomy of a Neighborhood: Homewood in the 21St Century, 2011

    Anatomy of a Neighborhood: Homewood in the 21St Century, 2011

    ANATOMY OF A NEIGHBORHOOD: HOMEWOOD IN THE 21ST CENTURY March 2011 Project in support of the Homewood Children’s Village report: State of the Village, 2011 Program in Urban and Regional Analysis University Center for Social and Urban Research University of Pittsburgh 121 University Place Pittsburgh, PA 15260 Homewood Children’s Village University of Pittsburgh School of Social Work Center on Race and Social Problems Executive Summary The Urban and Regional Analysis program at the University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) has been engaged in a number of projects involving Pittsburgh neighborhoods, with its Pittsburgh Neighborhood and Community Information System (PNCIS) serving as a valuable resource for these projects. Homewood is a neighborhood in Pittsburgh’s East End that has experienced tremendous change since the 1940s, as suburbanization, population loss and post-industrial restructuring of the Pittsburgh region have deeply affected this community. This report summarizes collaboration between UCSUR and the Homewood Children’s Village in 2010. Information from this study will also be part of the Homewood Children’s Village State of the Village (2011).1 Some prominent changes and trends analyzed in this report include: Homewood continues to lose population. Between 2000 and 2010, Homewood’s population dropped 30.6 percent, to 6,600 residents. In Homewood South and Homewood West, residents aged 65 and over make up nearly a third of the population. The average sales price for existing residential homes in Homewood was $9,060 in 2009, one-tenth the average price for a home in the City of Pittsburgh. This 2009 price represents a substantial loss of home equity from twenty years earlier, when the average home sold for over $22,000 in current (2010) dollars.
  • Allegheny County Community Learning Hubs Safe Places for Kids to Go to Do Schoolwork and Participate in Enrichment Activities During COVID-19

    Allegheny County Community Learning Hubs Safe Places for Kids to Go to Do Schoolwork and Participate in Enrichment Activities During COVID-19

    Allegheny County Community Learning Hubs Safe places for kids to go to do schoolwork and participate in enrichment activities during COVID-19. Why a learning hub? • Children will be grouped in pods of 10 or fewer and will spend the entire day Learning hubs are a great option for parents who need childcare when in-person with that pod school is not in session. Learning hub staff will help facilitate the virtual curriculum • Adequate spaces, desk and chairs are available to maintain physical distancing from your child’s school district in the morning and conduct fun activities with them in the afternoon. • Children must wear their own mask at all times, except when eating or drinking Locations What is a day like at a learning hub? There are more than 50 learning hubs in Allegheny County. Most locations are Most learning hubs are open all day on weekdays (check with the hub you are open Monday through Friday during normal school hours. Contact a hub near you interested in for exact times). Free Wi-Fi is available, but your child should bring to enroll and to find out more. their own technology device (laptop computer, tablet, phone). Each child will get headphones for online work. Eligibility Every learning hub has free spots available for low-income families, with priority Staff will help children in the following ways: for families experiencing homelessness, families involved in child welfare or other • Help children get online each morning and keep them motivated to engage human services and children of essential workers. Some learning hub locations virtually offer flexibility with payment including private pay, subsidies and free options.
  • Social Services Activist Richard Garland Brings “Juice” to a New Program That Puts Ex-Cons on the Street to Stop Brutal Violence Before Lives Are Lost

    Social Services Activist Richard Garland Brings “Juice” to a New Program That Puts Ex-Cons on the Street to Stop Brutal Violence Before Lives Are Lost

    Social services activist Richard Garland brings “juice” to a new program that puts ex-cons on the street to stop brutal violence before lives are lost. By Jim Davidson Photography by Steve Mellon Adrienne Young offers a cherished image of her son, Javon, gunned down a decade ago in the last epidemic of street violence involving youth in Pittsburgh. Young went on to found Tree of Hope, a faith-based agency that serves families and children devastated by senseless killings. 13 The story is familiar now. A dispute over turf, money, girls, pride or next to nothing is replayed again and again on the streets of Pittsburgh — streets now marked with the ferocity, the violence, the tragedy that can bring down a neighborhood when young people have guns. ❖ Adrienne Young knows about it all too well. On a night just before Christmas 10 years ago, her 18-year-old son, Javon Thompson, an artist who had just finished his first semester at Carnegie Mellon University, was visiting a friend’s apartment in East Liberty. “He was successful. He had never done anything to anyone. He was an artist and writer — he was a great child,” Young says now. That night, Benjamin Wright, a robber dressed in gang colors, burst into the apartment and icily ordered Thompson to “say his last words.” Gunshots rang out, killing Thompson and wounding two others. Wright, who later confessed that he shot Thompson and robbed him for failing to show proper respect to his Bloods street gang, is serving a life sentence. ❖ But the carnage from the violence extends well beyond the victims and the shooter.
  • Hays Woods Task Force Report - Draft for Discussion Hays Woods Task Force Report - Draft for Discussion 3 Table of Contents Letter from Task Force Co-Chairs

    Hays Woods Task Force Report - Draft for Discussion Hays Woods Task Force Report - Draft for Discussion 3 Table of Contents Letter from Task Force Co-Chairs

    Hays Woods Task Force DRAFT Findings and Recommendations to Mayor William Peduto and the Pittsburgh City Council MARCH 2019 DRAFT ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Mayor William Peduto Dave Depretis, Baldwin Borough, Mayor Sylvia Fields, Eden Hall Foundation Mike Gable, Department of Public Works Co-Chairs of the Hays Woods Task Force Ray Gastil, Department of City Planning Corey O’Connor, Councilman, District 5, City of Pittsburgh Hannah Hardy, Allegheny County Health Department Tom Murphy, Urban Land Institute Ryan Herbinko, 31st Ward Community Action Group, Lincoln Place resident Michael Knoop, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Office of Councilman Corey O’Connor Sarah Koenig, Audubon Society of Western Pennsylvania Curt Conrad, Chief of Staff Roy Kraynyk, Allegheny Land Trust Erin Jensen, Operations Intern Joey Lynn Ulrich, Venture Outdoors Ilyssa Manspeizer, Landforce Department of City Planning Peg McCormack, Riverlife Ray Gastil, Planning Director Jayne Miller, Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy Andrew Dash, Assistant Director Camila Rivera Tinsley, Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy Kara Smith, Principal Environmental Planner Heather Sage, Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy Martina Battistone, Senior Environmental Planner Kate St. John, Friends of Hays Woods Ose Akinlotan, Neighborhood Planner Sonya Tilghman, Hazelwood Initiative Mike Walsh, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Task Force Members Karen Abrams, Heinz Endowments John Barret, Baldwin Borough Patrick Bondi, Baldwin Borough Shade Tree Commission Jacqui Bonomo, PennFuture Lisa Brown, Economic
  • City of Pittsburgh Neighborhood Profiles Census 2010 Summary File 1 (Sf1) Data

    City of Pittsburgh Neighborhood Profiles Census 2010 Summary File 1 (Sf1) Data

    CITY OF PITTSBURGH NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILES CENSUS 2010 SUMMARY FILE 1 (SF1) DATA PROGRAM IN URBAN AND REGIONAL ANALYSIS UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR SOCIAL AND URBAN RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH JULY 2011 www.ucsur.pitt.edu About the University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) The University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) was established in 1972 to serve as a resource for researchers and educators interested in the basic and applied social and behavioral sciences. As a hub for interdisciplinary research and collaboration, UCSUR promotes a research agenda focused on the social, economic and health issues most relevant to our society. UCSUR maintains a permanent research infrastructure available to faculty and the community with the capacity to: (1) conduct all types of survey research, including complex web surveys; (2) carry out regional econometric modeling; (3) analyze qualitative data using state‐of‐the‐art computer methods, including web‐based studies; (4) obtain, format, and analyze spatial data; (5) acquire, manage, and analyze large secondary and administrative data sets including Census data; and (6) design and carry out descriptive, evaluation, and intervention studies. UCSUR plays a critical role in the development of new research projects through consultation with faculty investigators. The long‐term goals of UCSUR fall into three broad domains: (1) provide state‐of‐the‐art research and support services for investigators interested in interdisciplinary research in the behavioral, social, and clinical sciences; (2) develop nationally recognized research programs within the Center in a few selected areas; and (3) support the teaching mission of the University through graduate student, post‐ doctoral, and junior faculty mentoring, teaching courses on research methods in the social sciences, and providing research internships to undergraduate and graduate students.
  • Of the School District of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Minutes

    Of the School District of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Minutes

    THE BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA MINUTES Meeting of: August 25,2004 Call of the Meeting: Regular Meeting Members Present: Mr. Brentley, Mrs. Colaizzi, Dr. Dowd, Mrs. Fink, Mr. Isler, Mr. Matthews, Mr. McCrea, Mr. Romaniello, Sr., and Mr. Taylor Present 9. Members Absent: Absent 0. The following matters were received and acted upon. Actions taken are recorded following the reports. THE BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15213 Administration Building 341 South Bellefieid Avenue August 25,2004 AGENDA ROLL CALL Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting of July 21,2004 Announcement of Executive Sessions Committee Reports 1. Committee on Education Roll Call 2. Committee on BusinessEinance Roll Call Personnel Report 3. Personnel Report of the Superintendent of Schools Roll Call Financial Matters Financial Statement and Controller's Reports on the Status of Appropriations New Business Roll Call(s) We are an equal rights and opportunity school district. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS Legislative Meeting of August 25, 2004 In addition to executive sessions announced at the legislative meeting of July 21 2004, the Board met in executive session on July 27, August 16, and immediately before this legislative meeting to discuss various personnel matters, that may include, but are not limited to: administrative vacancies, residency waivers, disciplinary matters, and positions opened and closed. The Board does not vote at executive sessions. Committee on Education August 25,2004 Page 1 COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AUGUST 25,2004 DIRECTORS: The Committee on Student Services recommends the adoption of the following resolutions, that the proper officers of the Board be authorized to enter into contracts relating to those resolutions and that authority be given to the staff to change account numbers, the periods of performance, and such other details as may be necessary to carry out the intent of the resolution, so long as the total amount of money carried in the resolution is not exceeded.
  • The Following Letter Is an Example of a National Highway System Revision Request

    The Following Letter Is an Example of a National Highway System Revision Request

    The following letter is an example of a National Highway System revision request. The blue text is what the agency (PennDOT Engineering District, MPO, RPO, or Independent County) should provide to PennDOT Central Office HPMS Staff for review. Please be sure to reference the Functional Classification, National Highway System, and Intermodal Connector Revision Procedures prior to completing a submittal. If you have questions concerning National Highway System revisions please contact: Patrick McVeigh – HPMS Coordinator East – [email protected] or (717) 772-0567 John Moloney – HPMS Coordinator West – [email protected] or (717) 787-2187 Date Mr. Laine Heltebridle, Director Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Planning and Research P.O. Box 3555 Harrisburg, PA 17105-3555 Dear Mr. Heltebridle: The PennDOT Engineering District/MPO/RPO/Independent County is requesting the Addition/Deletion of Road Name 1 and Road Name 2 in Borough/City/County name to the National Highway System. Attached is a Functional Classification map showing the proposed Addition/Deletion and a copy of Engineering District District #- 0’s/MPO/RPO/Independent County concurrence. This request will add .94 miles to the National Highway System. ADDITION(S) ROAD(S): Bayfront Connector, Erie City and Harbor Creek Township, Erie County (new Road) US Route 20, Erie City, Erie County (existing Urban Other Principal Arterial) LIMIT(S): Bayfront Connector is a new road that begins at the Bayfront Expressway (SR 4034), an Urban Other Principal Arterial, and continues in a south easterly direction to Interstate 90. The total length of this new road is approximately 6.4 miles. US Route 20, is an existing Urban Other Principal Arterial that begins at PA Route 299 (Powell Avenue), and Urban Other Principal Arterial, and continues in an easterly direction to Interstate 79.
  • Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania

    DRAFT CITY OF PITTSBURGH P ENNSYLVANIA JURISDICTION: City of Pittsburgh NEIGHBORHOOD MAYOR: Luke Ravenstahl STABILIZATION JURISDICTION WEB ADDRESS: PROGRAM http://www.city.pittsburgh.pa.us/ SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT NSP CONTACT PERSON: Ms. Susan Scheuring ADDRESS: For Submission to HUD 200 Ross Street, 2nd Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15219 December 1, 2008 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (412) 255-2667 FAX NUMBER: (412) 393-0151 EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM (NSP) CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Table of Contents…………...…………...…………...…..……………….…………..1 B. SF 424 Form…………………………………………………………………………….2 C. Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………...3 D. Areas of Greatest Need…………………………...……………………………….....4 E. Distribution and Uses of Funds……………………………………………………20 F. Definitions and Descriptions……………….………………………………………25 G. Low Income Targeting………………………………………………………………28 H. Acquisitions and Relocation……………………………………………………….29 I. Public Comment Period…………………………………………………………….30 J. Information By Activity………………………..…………………………………….32 K. Total Budget…………………………………………………………………………..41 L. Performance Measures……………………………………………………………...42 M. Certifications………………………….………………………………………………43 Neighborhood Stabilization Program 1 FY 2008 City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania B. HUD SF 424 FORM: 1. HUD SF 424 Form – Attached is the Standard Form – 424, as required by HUD, in support of the City of Pittsburgh’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program Application. Neighborhood Stabilization Program