New Jersey State Plan Draft Proposed February 15, 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Jersey State Plan Draft Proposed February 15, 2017 Every Student Succeeds Act New Jersey State Plan Draft Proposed February 15, 2017 New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Table of Contents From the Commissioner ............................................................................................. 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4 Section 1: Long-term Goals ....................................................................................... 8 Section 2: Consultation and Performance Management ..........................................18 2.1 Consultation ................................................................................................................... 18 2.2 System of Performance Management ............................................................................ 24 Section 3: Academic Assessments ...........................................................................36 Section 4: Accountability, Support, and Improvement for Schools ........................40 4.1 Accountability Systems ................................................................................................. 42 4.2 Identification of Schools ................................................................................................ 68 4.3 State Support and Improvement for Low-performing Schools...................................... 72 Section 5: Supporting Excellent Educators .............................................................79 5.1 Educator Development, Retention and Advancement ................................................... 79 5.2 Support for Educators .................................................................................................... 81 5.3 Educator Equity ............................................................................................................. 87 Section 6: Supporting All Students ........................................................................104 6.1 Well-Rounded and Supportive Education for Students ............................................... 104 6.2 Program-Specific Requirements .................................................................................. 116 Appendices: A. Interim Goals B. Stakeholder Feedback Index C. Educator Equity Data D. PARCC Results E. AchieveNJ Standard Setting Report F. English Learner Entry and Exit Criteria 2 New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION From the Commissioner Dear students, parents, educators, policy makers and broader school community members, With this letter, I am encouraging you to review and provide feedback on New Jersey's draft state plan under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) staff and I deeply appreciate and hope to continue the meaningful conversations we have had with you and your fellow stakeholders about what type of schools each and every one of our students deserves. As you consider the draft, which will be finalized and submitted by April 3, 2017, please recognize that the policies included here are just pieces, albeit important pieces, of our broader education work in New Jersey. The following themes emerge throughout the plan, as they align with our overall efforts to ensure all of our students have access to the high-quality schools we envision for them. Students and their well-being are at the center of all of NJDOE’s work. The policies already in place in New Jersey and those set forth in this state plan recognize it is NJDOE’s role to set high standards for all of our students, identify gaps and, with data, policies and flexible federal funding mechanisms, empower school districts and school communities to identify the unique needs of their students and help them achieve and excel beyond the high standards. NJDOE recognizes that school district and school communities are best positioned to identify the unique needs of students. When stakeholders were asked what aspects of schools are most important, the answers were varied, but important themes emerged. For instance, stakeholders throughout the state indicated they want all students to have educational experiences that challenge them to reach their greatest potential. Stakeholders said they also expect schools to provide welcoming, safe, healthy and captivating learning experiences that support the whole child’s development. Recognizing the tremendous diversity of student populations and priorities in the state’s 2,500 schools, NJDOE set forth policies in the state plan that provide schools and districts the flexibility to prioritize what their unique student populations need to be provided with well-rounded educational experiences. There must be a relentless focus on ensuring all students, particularly those in historically disadvantaged subgroups, have equal access to high-quality educators and educational experiences. Despite the many changes enacted in ESSA, the law still requires all state agencies, school districts and schools to identify gaps or places where historically disadvantaged students are not making the progress they need to graduate high school ready for college and careers and to use ESSA funds for the explicit purpose of closing the identified gaps. This aligns perfectly with New Jersey’s collective expectation that all students, regardless of race, economic status, zip code, language or disability, have access to challenging educational opportunities that encourage students to reach their greatest potential. In closing, I would like to reiterate how important it is for NJDOE to ensure your voices and perspectives are reflected in this plan and throughout our work because we must continuously strive to improve current and future opportunities for all of our students. I sincerely appreciate the collaboration we have experienced thus far and will continue moving forward. Sincerely, Kimberley Harrington 3 New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Introduction I. Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) was passed in December 2015 with bipartisan congressional support. It replaced the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2002 and reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965. Despite some key changes in the law, the purpose remains the same: to ensure all students have equitable access to high-quality educational resources and opportunities, and to close educational achievement gaps. New Jersey’s Consolidated State ESSA Implementation Plan (state plan) under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) - hereafter referred to as ESSA - describes some of the New Jersey Department of Education’s (NJDOE) broader work to ensure all students are able to graduate high school ready for college and career. In fact, funding from ESSA is intended to support programs, services and activities that are supplemental to the work states are already doing on behalf of students. The following pages reflect only the elements required in the ESSA state plan and are not representative of all NJDOE initiatives. II. From NCLB to ESSA While ESSA provides states greater discretion in a few key areas, the law maintains many of NCLB’s requirements. The chart below provides a brief description of some of the major requirements in NCLB and ESSA. NCLB Requirements ESSA Requirements Required states to set rigorous No change. Student standards for all students aligned Standards with college and career skills. ELA/Math: ELA/Math: Each in grades 3-8; and Each in grades 3-8; and Once in grades 10-12 Once in grades 9-12 Assessment Science: Science: Once in elementary; Once in elementary; Once in middle; and Once in middle; and Once in high school Once in high school Federal government set universal States set long-term goals for academic Long-Term long-term academic proficiency proficiency, high school graduation rate and Goals goals; states set high school English language proficiency. graduation rate goals. NCLB focused primarily on ESSA adds some discretion for states to academic proficiency rates. develop their school accountability systems. Secondary indicators included States are required to incorporate all of the graduation rates for high schools and following indicators: attendance for elementary/middle 1. Academic proficiency; School schools. Indicators were established 2. Graduation rates for high school; Accountability by federal government. 3. Academic growth or another statewide indicator of academic progress for K-8; 4. Progress toward English language proficiency; and 5. At least one other state-determined indicator of school quality or student success. 4 New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NCLB Requirements ESSA Requirements States annually identified schools in Changes were made to the identification need of improvement. A school was criteria, timeline and associated labels. States Identification designated as such if it failed to now identify schools in need of of Low make its annual yearly progress “comprehensive support and improvement” Performing (AYP) for two consecutive years. (overall low performance) and “targeted Schools support and improvement” (short-term low subgroup performance). Support for Federally established consequences States establish a system of support for Low each year a school remained “in need schools identified in need of comprehensive or Performing of improvement”; interventions were targeted support and improvement; districts Schools very school centered. play a more significant role in the process.
Recommended publications
  • 2010-11 MAIT Director's Report
    2010-11 MAIT Director’s Report Goals from Academic Year 2010-11 [Use this space to describe any goals your program set and to report results your program measured.] The Master of Arts in Instructional Technology (MAIT) Program faculty worked toward three major goals during the past year. First, we endeavored to continue partnerships with existing cohort groups and establish new partnerships. Secondly, we started to implement the Instructional Technology Leadership Academy (ITLA), and a minor program in Digital Literacy and Multimedia Design that we had developed during the 2009-2010 academic year. Finally, we successfully conducted a five-year program review. During 2010-2011 including Summer 2011, we offered a total of seven different off- campus programs. Eight Burlington cohort group students successfully finished the MAIT program in Fall 2010. Students in Brigantine, Linwood, Camden County Technical School (CCTS), and Millville III continued taking courses. Beginning in Spring 2011, the Southern Regional School District (SRSD) started a new cohort with 16 students. During the Summer 2011, we were able to offer an off-campus MAIT (non-cohort) course at Hammonton High School, and hope to continue offering off-campus courses at Hammonton High. During the Spring 2011, in conjunction with the ITLA, we launched INTC 4610: Advanced Instructional Technology I (2 crs.) with 19 selected pre-service teachers, and each student was placed in a school with a tech-savvy mentor. These students will continue to take INTC 4620: Advanced Instructional Technology II (2 crs.) in the Fall 2011 to advance their leadership and technology skills in K-12 schools.
    [Show full text]
  • No Child Left Behind and Its Communication Effectiveness in Diverse Communities
    Rowan University Rowan Digital Works Theses and Dissertations 9-13-2005 No Child Left Behind and its communication effectiveness in diverse communities Benjamin L. Daniel Rowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd Part of the Public Relations and Advertising Commons Recommended Citation Daniel, Benjamin L., "No Child Left Behind and its communication effectiveness in diverse communities" (2005). Theses and Dissertations. 986. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/986 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Rowan Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Rowan Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND AND ITS COMMUNICATION EFFECTIVENESS IN DIVERSE COMMUNITIES by Benjamin L. Daniel A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts Degree of The Graduate School at Rowan University 6/30/2005 Approved b Date Approved 0?3/a © 2005 Benjamin L. Daniel ABSTRACT Benjamin L. Daniel No Child Left Behind and its Communication Effectiveness in Diverse Communities 2005 Dr. Joseph Basso Public Relations The study sought to define the communication techniques and channels 15 school superintendents from randomly selected socioeconomically diverse school districts use to communicate the major provisions of federally mandated No Child Left Behind legislation to parents and the most effective techniques to communicate NCLB to parents in those districts most likely affected by the legislation. The author employed a Delphi technique and personal interviews to gather primary data. Findings indicate that superintendents considered print media and group settings the most effective means through which to communicate NCLB provisions to target audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Public School Directory 2017-2018
    PUBLICPUBLIC SCHOOL SCHOOL DIRECTORY DIRECTORY 2017-20182017-2018 www.middlesexcountynj.govwww.middlesexcountynj.gov Middlesex County Superintendent of Schools 13-15 Kennedy Boulevard East Brunswick, New Jersey 08816 Telephone: 732-249-2900 Fax: 732-296-6567 MISSION STATEMENT The Middlesex County Superintendent’s Office provides timely support with programs, certification and services that help school districts to operate efficiently and successfully. The office supports collaborative efforts for districts to share services that support student achievement and best practices for district operations. Yasmin E. Hernández-Manno, M.Ed. Interim Executive County Superintendent of Schools Debra Hudson, Secretary to the Interim Executive County Superintendent (ext. 1-3425) John Nemeth (ext.1-3406) Executive County School Business Official Barbara Ryan, Secretary to the Executive County School Business Official (ext. 1-3551) Naomi Vliet (ext. 1-3422) Educational Specialist/Generalist Carmen Engleman, Secretary to the Educational Specialist/Generalist (ext. 1-3488) Mark Lanzi (ext. 1-3421) Educational Specialist/Special Needs Carmen Engleman, Secretary (ext. 1-3488) TEACHER CERTIFICATION Ann Zampino (ext. 1-3495) Teacher Certification Raksha Parikh (ext. 1-3564) Substitute Certification SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION Rosemary Lepri (ext. 1-3584) School Transportation 1 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 100 RIVERVIEW PLAZA (Physical Address) P. O. Box 500 (Mailing Address) Trenton, NJ 08625-0500 Toll-Free Number 877-900-6960 Kimberly Harrington, Commissioner
    [Show full text]
  • Updated NJ Rankings.Xlsx
    New Jersey School Relative Efficiency Rankings ‐ Outcome = Student Growth 2012, 2013, 2014 (deviations from other schools in same county, controlling for staffing expenditure per pupil, economies of scale, grade range & student populations) 3 Year Panel Separate Yearly Model (Time Models (5yr Avg. Varying School School District School Grade Span Characteristics) Ranking 1 Characteristics) Ranking 2 ESSEX FELLS SCHOOL DISTRICT Essex Fells Elementary School PK‐06 2.92 23.44 1 Upper Township Upper Township Elementary School 03‐05 3.00 12.94 2 Millburn Township Schools Glenwood School KG‐05 2.19 62.69 3 Hopewell Valley Regional School District Toll Gate Grammar School KG‐05 2.09 10 2.66 4 Verona Public Schools Brookdale Avenue School KG‐04 2.33 42.66 5 Parsippany‐Troy Hills Township Schools Northvail Elementary School KG‐05 2.35 32.56 6 Fort Lee Public Schools School No. 1PK‐06 2.03 12 2.50 7 Ridgewood Public Schools Orchard Elementary School KG‐05 1.88 17 2.43 8 Discovery Charter School DISCOVERY CS 04‐08 0.89 213 2.42 9 Princeton Public Schools Community Park School KG‐05 1.70 32 2.35 10 Hopewell Valley Regional School District Hopewell Elementary School PK‐05 1.65 37 2.35 11 Cresskill Public School District Merritt Memorial PK‐05 1.69 33 2.33 12 West Orange Public Schools REDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL KG‐05 1.81 21 2.28 13 Millburn Township Schools South Mountain School PK‐05 1.93 14 2.25 14 THE NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELLIOTT STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PK‐04 2.15 82.25 15 PATERSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL 19 KG‐04 1.95 13 2.24 16 GALLOWAY TOWNSHIP
    [Show full text]
  • School District of Jamesburg Borough
    SCHOOL DISTRICT OF JAMESBURG BOROUGH JAMESBURG BOROUGH BOARD OF EDUCATION COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX JAMESBURG, NEW JERSEY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 JAMESBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, NEW JERSEY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE(S) INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal 2-6 Organizational Chart 7 Roster of Officials 8 Consultants and Advisors 9 FINANCIAL SECTION 10 Independent Auditor's Report 11 - 13 Required Supplementary Information - Part I 14 Management's Discussion and Analysis 15 - 23 Basic Financial Statements 24 A. District-wide Financial Statements 25 A- 1 Statement of Net Position 26 A-2 Statement of Activities 27 B. Fund Financial Statements 28 Governmental Funds: 29 B- 1 Balance Sheet 30 - 31 B- 2 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 32 B- 3 Reconciliation ofthe Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 33 Proprietary Funds: 34 B- 4 Statement of Net Position 35 B- 5 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 36 B- 6 Statement of Cash Flows 37 -i- PAGE(S) Fiduciary Funds: 38 B-7 Statement of Fiduciary Net Position 39 B- 8 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position 40 Notes to the Financial Statements 41 - 65 Required Supplementary Information - Part II 66 C. Budgetary Comparison Schedules 67 C- 1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund 68 - 74 C- la Combining Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund N/A C- Ib Education Jobs Fund Program Budgetary Comparison Schedule N/A C-2 Budgetary Comparison Schedule - Special Revenue Fund 75 - 76 Notes to Required Supplementary Information 77 C-3 Budgetary Comparison Schedule - Note to RSI 78 Other Supplementary Information 79 D.
    [Show full text]
  • NJ Science Education Network Points of Contact
    To: All NJ Science Education Network Points of Contact Please share information with teachers looking for employment, college and university grads, family, and friends. NJ Science Education Job Opportunities- Compiled by Elmer Dey, NJSEN January 14th, 2020, Edition The following positions were posted during the past three weeks (* -indicates the district also has openings in other subject areas) School Year 2019-2020 Job Opportunities *HS Chemistry & AP Chemistry Teacher (start January) Middlesex Borough Public Schools Biology Teacher (leave replacement) – Middlesex Borough To apply visit www.middlesex.k12.nj.us Click on Employment opportunities/Certificated Staff Vacancies *Biology Teacher Orange Public Schools Science Teacher – Orange Public Schools, Apply online at: www.applitrack.com/orangenj/onlineapp Biology Teacher (long term sub) Freehold Regional High School District Englishtown, NJ Apply online at: www.applitrack.com/frhsd/onlineapp PCTI | Diana C. Lobosco STEM Academy Positions Available: PHYSICS; BIOMED; AP BIO Passaic, NJ Apply here: https://www.applitrack.com/passaic/onlineapp/ Biology Teacher , Chemistry Teacher , Physics or Bilingual Physics Teacher Perth Amboy Public Schools All Positions currently available. Carol Wenk, Supervisor of Science Apply www.applitrack.com/paps/onlineapp Chemistry Teacher (leave replacement) Atlantic County Vocational School Mays Landing, NJ Send cover letter, resume, and certifications to: [email protected] or FAX 609-534-4503 Chemistry Teacher (leave replacement 3/16-6/30) Plumsted Twp. School District, New Egypt, NJ Send cover letter, resume, certifications, references and transcripts at: www.newegypt.us Click on departments/HR Chemistry Teacher HS Madison Public Schools Anticipated tenure track Chemistry Teacher at Madison High School? Thank you, Kelly Bosworth, Assistant Principal, Madison High School, [email protected] Apply online at: www.applitrack.com/madisonpublicschools/onlineapp Chemistry Teacher (long term sub.) Neptune Twp.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Five-Year Career and Technical Education State Plan
    U. S. Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education * * * * * * * * * * * The Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 STATE PLAN COVER PAGE State Name: NEW JERSEY Eligible Agency Submitting Plan on Behalf of State: NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Person at, or representing, the eligible agency responsible for answering questions on this plan: Signature: Name: Marie Barry Position: State Director, Career and Technical Education; Director, Office of Career and Technical Education Telephone: (609) 633-0665 Email: [email protected] Type of State Plan Submission (check one): ___ 6-Year Full Plan – FY 2007 – FY 2013 1-Year Transition – FY 2007 – FY 2008 (submitted April 2007) X 5-Year Plan – FY 2008 – FY 2013 Special Features of State Plan Submission (check all that apply): ___ Unified - Secondary and Postsecondary ___ Unified - Postsecondary Only ___ Title I only (All Title II funds have been consolidated under Title I) X Title I and Title II 1 NEW JERSEY FIVE-YEAR CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION STATE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE PART A: STATE PLAN NARRATIVE 4 I. PLANNING, COORDINATION, AND COLLABORATION PRIOR TO 5 PLAN SUBMISSION A. Statutory Requirements 5 B. Procedural Suggestions and Planning Reminders 11 II. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION 12 A. Statutory Requirements 12 B. Other Department Requirements 67 III. PROVISION OF SERVICES FOR SPECIAL POPULATIONS 70 A. Statutory Requirements 70 IV. ACCOUNTABILITY AND EVALUATION 79 A. Statutory Requirements 79 B. Other Department Requirements 93 V. TECH PREP PROGRAMS 94 A. Statutory Requirements 94 B. Other Department Requirements 108 VI. FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS 110 A.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Bergen
    COUNTY OF BERGEN 2021 COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL DIRECTORY WWW.CO.BERGEN.NJ.US Published by the COUNTY OF BERGEN Produced by the Office of the County Executive @BergenGov @BergenCountyNJ www.Co.Bergen.NJ.US Cover Bergen County Courthouse Editors Joseph P. Baldofsky Breanne Pellicano June 2021 Printed by Royal Printing Service CONTENTS County Executive ..................................................................................... ....5 Board of Commissioners ..............................................................................6 Commmissioners' Committee Assignments.............................................. ....8 Commissioner Representation on Various Boards & Agencies ............. ...8 Constitutional Officers ............................................................................. ...9 Education in Bergen County .................................................................. ...10 County Public School Districts (listed alphabetically) ................................................................................ ...11 Organizational Chart of County Government ...................................... ...12 County Departments, Authorities, Agencies, & Commissions (listed alphabetically) ................................................................................ ...15 County Administrative Divisions and Offices (listed alphabetically) ................................................................................ ...21 The Courts ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey's Best Schools in 2013
    NEW JERSEY’S BEST SCHOOLS IN 2013 Table of contents Elementary Schools 4 Performance Gains 5 Low-Income Student Performance 6 Black Student Performance 7 Latino Student Performance 8 Student Performance 9 Middle Schools 10 Performance Gains 11 Low-Income Student Performance 12 Black Student Performance 13 Latino Student Performance 14 Student Performance 15 High Schools 16 Low-Income Student Performance 17 Black Student Performance 18 Latino Student Performance 19 Student Performance 20 About the Top 10s JerseyCAN ranks schools in key areas so parents can compare schools to one another. We use these public school rankings to generate Top 10 Lists, which show the top-performing schools in five different areas: • Student performance • Low-income student performance • Black student performance • Latino student performance • Performance gains* Each subgroup’s performance score is an average of their reading and math proficiency at the highest tested grade level in that school. In order for a school to be on the Top 10 list for a major subgroup (low- income, black or Latino), the student body it serves must reflect the statewide student demographics for that subgroup. For example, Latinos represent 23 percent of New Jersey's population. For a school to be on the Top 10 list for Latino student performance, therefore, at least 23 percent of its students must be Latino. The statewide student demographics for all subgroups are as follows: 35% = Low-Income 16% = Black 23% = Latino * There are no performance gains at the high school level because reading and math are only tested once) NEW JERSEY TOP TEN SCHOOLS, 2013 JERSEYCAN 3 Top 10 Elementary Schools TOP 10 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Traditional public school Performance gains Charter school RANK NAME % POINT CHANGE IN PROFICIENCY Bayonne Board of Education 1 Nicholas Oresko School 20.2 Ewing Township Public Schools 2 Antheil Elementary School 19.0 Passaic City Public Schools 3 Theodore Roosevelt School No.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Jersey Department of Education
    The New Jersey Department of Education Representatives from the following organizations have engaged in conversations with the NJDOE about New Jersey’s ESSA State Plan and related policies: Abbott Leadership Institute Diocese of Trenton NJ Association for the Education of NJ Parent Teacher Association Advocates for Children of NJ (ACNJ) Education Law Center Young Children (NJPTA) Aging Out Project Educational Services Commission NJ Association of Colleges for NJ Principals and Supervisors Agudath Israel of America NJ Office of NJ Teacher Education Association (NJPSA) AIM Institute for Learning and Essex County Juvenile Detention NJ Association of Federal Program NJ School Age Care Coalition Research Center Administrators (NJAFPA) NJ School Boards Association Alliance for Newark Public Schools Essex County Local Education NJ Association of Independent (NJSBA) American Federation of Teachers – Agency Schools NJ School-Age Care Coalition (NJ NJ Chapter Foreign Language Educators of NJ NJ Association of School SACC) American Heart Association Garden State Coalition of Schools Psychologists (NJASP) NJ Special Parent Advocacy Group ARC of NJ Great Schools NJ NJ Association of State Colleges NJ State Board of Education Archway Programs Guttenburg and Universities (NJASCU) NJ State School Nurses Association Association of Independent Junior Achievement of NJ NJ Association of Student Councils (NJSSNA) Colleges and Universities in NJ Junior League NJ Association of Supervision and NJ Statewide Parent Advocacy Association of Language Arts Juvenile
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Evaluation Model 2018-2019
    Teacher Evaluation Model 2018-2019 West Orange Public Schools DEAC Committee SY 2018 West Orange Board of Education Ronald Charles, Board President Mark Robertson Board Vice President Ken Alper, Board Member Sandra Mordecai, Board Member Irving Schwarzbaum, Board Member West Orange Central Office Administration Jeffrey Rutzky, Superintendent of Schools Eveny de Mendez, Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum & Instruction John Calavano, Business Administrator and Board Secretary DEAC Committee Work Teacher Observation Model Review Marzano 2017 Update • Districts were informed about "major updates" and "critical adjustments" to the current Marzano model • Effective 2018, the new model will replace current teacher observation instrument • Districts are required to change to the new model or adopt another • Includes iObservation platform DEAC Charge to review Marzano’s new Focused Teacher Evaluation Model Teacher Observation Model Look Fors District DEAC Achieve NJ Priorities Perspective DEAC Perspective on Look Fors Good Teaching & Learning Inter-Rater Reliability Fair for All True to best practices of good Used for observing best practices, Evidence based. Meets the needs teaching and learning. Model not punitively, and allows for of both instructional and support doesn’t consume and become more evaluations to be implemented staff. Considers all components of important than instruction and consistently by all observers. teaching and learning, recognizing professional responsibilities. instructional efforts not observed in the classroom. Clarity of Expectations Growth Model Collaborative Process Rubric has simple, clear language Used to improve teaching and Fosters a collaborative dialogue that that supports growth, focuses on learning with a focus on students. is transparent, authentic, organic teaching and learning, and scoring Encourages teachers to make and true to a clinical supervision is easily understaood.
    [Show full text]
  • Every Student Succeeds Act New Jersey State Plan Draft
    Every Student Succeeds Act New Jersey State Plan Draft Proposed February 15, 2017 New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Table of Contents From the Commissioner .............................................................................................3 Introduction ................................................................................................................4 Section 1: Long-term Goals .......................................................................................8 Section 2: Consultation and Performance Management ..........................................18 2.1 Consultation ................................................................................................................... 18 2.2 System of Performance Management ............................................................................ 24 Section 3: Academic Assessments ...........................................................................36 Section 4: Accountability, Support, and Improvement for Schools ........................40 4.1 Accountability Systems ................................................................................................. 42 4.2 Identification of Schools ................................................................................................ 68 4.3 State Support and Improvement for Low-performing Schools...................................... 72 Section 5: Supporting Excellent Educators .............................................................79 5.1 Educator Development, Retention and Advancement
    [Show full text]