DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation Master Plan 2020 Provo City Transportation Master Plan 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation Master Plan 2020 Provo City Transportation Master Plan 2020 PROVO CITY Transportation Master Plan 2020 Provo City Transportation Master Plan 2020 Acknowledgements Provo City Mayor and Deputy Mayor Michelle Kaufusi, Mayor Isaac Paxman, Deputy Mayor Provo City Council Shannon Ellsworth, Council Member Bill Fillmore, Council Member George Handley, Council Member Dave Harding, Council Member Travis Hoban, Council Member Dave Sewell, Council Member David Shipley, Council Member Provo City Planning Commission Dave Anderson Andrew Howard Deborah Jensen Lisa Jensen Robert Knudsen Russ Phillips Laureen Urquiaga Maria Winden Provo City Transportation Mobility and Advisory Committee David Arnold Clancy Black James Hamula Deborah Jensen Stephen Mongie Joy McMurray Mitsuru Saito Provo City Administration Wayne Parker, Chief Administrative Officer Nicole Martin, Community Relations/Public Information Officer 1 Provo City Transportation Master Plan 2020 Provo City Public Works Dave Decker, Public Works Director David Graves, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer David Day, Engineer Jared Penrod, Engineer Jonathan Knight, Engineer Casey Serr, Engineer Shane Winters, Engineer Parametrix Charles Allen, Engineer Michael Baker, Planner George Benford, Principal Elizabeth Diamond, Engineer Vern Keeslar, Project Manager Ian Kilpatrick, Planner Heather McLaughlin-Kolb, Graphic Designer Tim Peterson, Planner Rhianna Riggs, Marketing Jennifer Rose, Administration Kyle Stahley, Engineer Kai Tohinaka, Planner Claire Woodman, Planner Township + Range Tim Sullivan About Parametrix Parametrix is a 100-percent employee-owned firm dedicated to providing high quality, client- oriented planning, engineering, and environmental consulting services. Founded in Washington in 1969, Parametrix has 14 offices located in the Western U.S. with a staff of 500 professionals providing multidisciplinary services in transportation, environmental planning and compliance, water resources, and community building. The Utah office of Parametrix serves the transportation planning and traffic engineering markets in Utah and the Intermountain West. Parametrix offers clients the best of both worlds: a local office with demonstrated success that understands client needs supplemented by a national firm with resources and expertise in a wide range of transportation-related skills. 2 Provo City Transportation Master Plan 2020 Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction .............................................................................................................. 12 1.1 Purpose of Transportation Master Plan .............................................................................. 12 1.2 Values, Goals, and Objectives ............................................................................................. 12 1.3 Policy Statements ................................................................................................................ 13 1.3.1 Physical Roadway Capacity and Livable Street Standards ........................................... 13 1.3.2 Trip Generation Rate .................................................................................................... 15 1.3.3 Funding ......................................................................................................................... 16 1.3.4 Access Management ..................................................................................................... 16 1.3.5 Traffic Calming .............................................................................................................. 17 1.3.6 Transcontinental Truck Traffic on University Avenue (U.S. 189) ................................. 17 1.3.7 Transportation Demand Management Strategies ....................................................... 18 Chapter 2 – Roadway Network Conditions ................................................................................... 20 2.1 Travel Demand Model Calibration ...................................................................................... 20 2.1.1 Socioeconomic Inputs ................................................................................................... 20 2.1.2 Road Network Inputs .................................................................................................... 21 2.1.3 Base Year Model Correction Factors ............................................................................ 27 2.2 Level of Service .................................................................................................................... 29 2.3 Existing Roadway Level of Service ....................................................................................... 29 2.4 2024 Roadway Modeled Network ...................................................................................... 31 2.5 2040 Roadway Modeled Network ...................................................................................... 35 2.6 2040 Regional Travel Patterns ............................................................................................ 39 Chapter 3 – Safety ......................................................................................................................... 41 3.1 City-wide Crashes ................................................................................................................ 41 3.1.1 Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes ................................................................................... 43 3.2 Bicycle-Involved Crashes ..................................................................................................... 45 3.3 Pedestrian-Involved Crashes ............................................................................................... 47 3.4 Non-State Route Crashes .................................................................................................... 50 3.4.1 Freedom Boulevard and Cougar Boulevard ................................................................. 52 3.4.2 Freedom Boulevard and 100 North .............................................................................. 52 3.4.3 Freedom Boulevard and Center Street ........................................................................ 53 3.4.4 Canyon Road and 2230 North ...................................................................................... 54 3 Provo City Transportation Master Plan 2020 3.4.5 900 East and Birch Lane ................................................................................................ 55 3.4.6 900 East and 820 North ................................................................................................ 56 3.5 Conclusions and Considerations ......................................................................................... 57 3.5.1 Bicycle Considerations .................................................................................................. 57 3.5.2 Pedestrian Considerations ............................................................................................ 58 3.5.3 Hotspot Intersections ................................................................................................... 58 Chapter 4 – Roadway Network ..................................................................................................... 59 4.1 Functional Classification ...................................................................................................... 59 4.1.1 Local Roads ................................................................................................................... 61 4.1.2 Collector Roads ............................................................................................................. 61 4.1.3 Arterial Roads ............................................................................................................... 62 4.1.4 Expressways, Freeways, and Interstates ...................................................................... 62 4.2 Roadway Cross-Sections ...................................................................................................... 62 4.2.1 Local Cross-Sections ..................................................................................................... 64 4.2.2 Collector Cross-Section ................................................................................................. 67 4.2.3 Arterial Cross-Sections .................................................................................................. 67 4.3 Bicycle Facilities ................................................................................................................... 68 4.4 Median Types ...................................................................................................................... 70 4.5 Access Versus Mobility ........................................................................................................ 70 4.6 Hazardous Materials Routes ............................................................................................... 71 4.6.1 Primary Hazardous Materials Routes ........................................................................... 71 4.6.2 Secondary Hazardous Materials Routes ....................................................................... 71 Chapter 5 – Active Transportation ................................................................................................ 73 5.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 73 5.2 Background .........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix a Stations Transitioning on June 12
    APPENDIX A STATIONS TRANSITIONING ON JUNE 12 DMA CITY ST NETWORK CALLSIGN LICENSEE 1 ABILENE-SWEETWATER SWEETWATER TX ABC/CW (D KTXS-TV BLUESTONE LICENSE HOLDINGS INC. 2 ALBANY GA ALBANY GA NBC WALB WALB LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC 3 ALBANY GA ALBANY GA FOX WFXL BARRINGTON ALBANY LICENSE LLC 4 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ADAMS MA ABC WCDC-TV YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. 5 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY NBC WNYT WNYT-TV, LLC 6 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY ABC WTEN YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. 7 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY FOX WXXA-TV NEWPORT TELEVISION LICENSE LLC 8 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY PITTSFIELD MA MYTV WNYA VENTURE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLC 9 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CW WCWN FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. 10 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CBS WRGB FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. 11 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM CW KASY-TV ACME TELEVISION LICENSES OF NEW MEXICO, LLC 12 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM UNIVISION KLUZ-TV ENTRAVISION HOLDINGS, LLC 13 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM PBS KNME-TV REGENTS OF THE UNIV. OF NM & BD.OF EDUC.OF CITY OF ALBUQ.,NM 14 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM ABC KOAT-TV KOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC. 15 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM NBC KOB-TV KOB-TV, LLC 16 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM CBS KRQE LIN OF NEW MEXICO, LLC 17 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM TELEFUTURKTFQ-TV TELEFUTURA ALBUQUERQUE LLC 18 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE CARLSBAD NM ABC KOCT KOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNANCE & OVERSIGHT NARRATIVE Local Authority
    GOVERNANCE & OVERSIGHT NARRATIVE Local Authority: Wasatch County Instructions: In the cells below, please provide an answer/description for each question. PLEASE CHANGE THE COLOR OF SUBSTANTIVE NEW LANGUAGE INCLUDED IN YOUR PLAN THIS YEAR! 1) Access & Eligibility for Mental Health and/or Substance Abuse Clients Who is eligible to receive mental health services within your catchment area? What services (are there different services available depending on funding)? Wasatch County Family Clinic-Wasatch Behavioral Health Special Service District (WCFC-WMH) is a comprehensive community mental health center providing mental health and substance use disorder services to the residents of Wasatch County. WCFC-WBH provides a mental health and Substance Use screening to any Wasatch County resident requesting services. Based on available resources, (funding or otherwise), prospective clients will be referred to or linked with available resources. Medicaid eligible clients will be provided access to the full array of services available. Individuals who carry commercial insurance will be seen as their benefits allow. Clients with no funding may be seen on a sliding fee scale. Who is eligible to receive substance abuse services within your catchment area? What services (are there different services available depending on funding)? Identify how you manage wait lists. How do you ensure priority populations get served? WCFC-WBH provides substance abuse services to residents of Wasatch County. Medicaid and commercial insurances are also accepted and services are provided as benefits allow. WCFC-WBH provides substance abuse services as funding allows those without insurance or ability to pay. A sliding fee scale is available for these clients. Clients accepted into the drug court also have all services available and fees are also set based on the sliding scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Director of Capital Development $146,000 - $160,000 Annually
    UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY Director of Capital Development $146,000 - $160,000 annually Utah Transit Authority provides integrated mobility solutions to service life’s connection, improve public health and enhance quality of life. • Central Corridor improvements: Expansion of the Utah Valley Express (UVX) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line to Salt Lake City; addition of a Davis County to Salt Lake City BRT line; construction of a BRT line in Ogden; and the pursuit of world class transit-oriented developments at the Point of the Mountain during the repurposing of 600 acres of the Utah State Prison after its future relocation. To learn more go to: rideuta.com VISION Provide an integrated system of innovative, accessible and efficient public transportation services that increase access to opportunities and contribute to a healthy environment for the people of the Wasatch region. THE POSITION The Director of Capital Development plays a critical ABOUT UTA role in getting things done at Utah Transit Authority UTA was founded on March 3, 1970 after residents from (UTA). This is a senior-level position reporting to the Salt Lake City and the surrounding communities of Chief Service Development Officer and is responsible Murray, Midvale, Sandy, and Bingham voted to form a for cultivating projects that improve the connectivity, public transit district. For the next 30 years, UTA provided frequency, reliability, and quality of UTA’s transit residents in the Wasatch Front with transportation in the offerings. This person oversees and manages corridor form of bus service. During this time, UTA also expanded and facility projects through environmental analysis, its operations to include express bus routes, paratransit grant funding, and design processes, then consults with service, and carpool and vanpool programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report Matthew M
    Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report Matthew M. Miller, Mercedes Beaudoin, and Reid Ewing University of Utah, Metropolitan Research Center 2 of 142 Report No. UT‐17.XX PROVO-OREM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (TRIP) Prepared for: Utah Department of Transportation Research Division Submitted by: University of Utah, Metropolitan Research Center Authored by: Matthew M. Miller, Mercedes Beaudoin, and Reid Ewing Final Report June 2017 ______________________________________________________________________________ Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report 3 of 142 DISCLAIMER The authors alone are responsible for the preparation and accuracy of the information, data, analysis, discussions, recommendations, and conclusions presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, endorsements, or policies of the Utah Department of Transportation or the U.S. Department of Transportation. The Utah Department of Transportation makes no representation or warranty of any kind, and assumes no liability therefore. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors acknowledge the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) for funding this research through the Utah Transportation Research Advisory Council (UTRAC). We also acknowledge the following individuals from UDOT for helping manage this research: Jeff Harris Eric Rasband Brent Schvanaveldt Jordan Backman Gracious thanks to our paid peer reviewers in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University: Dr. Grant G. Schultz, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE. Dr. Mitsuru Saito, Ph.D, P.E., F. ASCE, F. ITE While not authors, the efforts of the following people helped make this report possible. Data Collection Proof Reading/Edits Ethan Clark Ray Debbie Weaver Thomas Cushing Clint Simkins Jack Egan Debolina Banerjee Katherine A.
    [Show full text]
  • H Plan Ordin Hearing Nning C Staff R Nance a Date
    Planning Commission Staff Report Ordinance Amendment Hearing Date: January 9, 2013 ITEM 3* The Engineering Department requests an ammendment to Provo City Code, Sections 15.13.010 Names of Streets, 15.13.030 System to be Followed, and 15.13.040 Costs Related to Street Name Changes, in order to modify and update the sections relaated to Street Naming. City Wide Impact 12-0019OAO Appplicant: Provo City Engineering Current Legal Use: Not applicable Staff Coordinator: Carrie Walls Relevant History: Provo City Code Sections 15.13.010, Number of Properties: City-wide Impact 15.13.030, and 15.13.040 were repealed and reenacted in 1999. There have been no amendments to these sections since that time. *Council Action Required: Yes Neighborhood Issues: Staff is unaware of any Related Application(s): None neighborhood issues in regard to the proposed amendments. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 2. Continue to a future date to obtain Summary of Key Issues: additional information or to further consider information presented. The • The Code Sections were repealed and reenacted in next available meeting date is 1999. February13, 2013, at 5:00 p.m. • There have been no amendments sincee that time. 3. Recommend Denial of the Staff Recommendation: proposed ordinance amendment. This 1. Recommend Approval of the proposed ordinance would be a change from the Staff amendment. This action would be consistent with the recommendation; the Planning recommendation of the Staff Report. Any additional Commission should state new findings. changes should be stated with the motion OVERVIEW The current ordinances for the naming of streets, the system of address numbering and how the costs are recouped were repealed and reenacted in 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2015 FWA Newsletter
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Faculty Women’s Association NEWSLETTER Fall 2014/Winter 2015 INSIDE 2 3 4 5 10 THIS A word from Upcoming By Study, By Recent FWA FWA our President Events Faith Publications Membership ISSUE About FWA Recap: Spring Application 2014-2015 2014 Annual Board Retreat 2 Dear Women, Our association welcomes you—all of you. As we continue this academic A WORD year on campus, it is our hope that many more of you will participate in the activities and camaraderie of the Faculty Women’s Association. Our theme—”Expressions of Faith: Women Fulfilling the Mission of BYU”— FROM OUR provides opportunity for spiritual uplift, professional support, and friend- ship. PRESIDENT We recognize that all women have busy schedules, but we ask that you give FWA a chance to bless your life. You will see wonderful examples of faithful women who are fulfilling the mission of BYU in diverse and “GIVE FWA A exemplary ways, while personally progressing and assisting the students they teach. Did I mention that we need your contribution? Experienced CHANCE TO faculty and administrators, new women faculty, part-time faculty, faculty from every college, clinical faculty, and even those who don’t fit a category, BLESS YOUR please come. LIFE.” We began the year by celebrating the anniversary of the HFAC with Janielle Christensen and enjoyed a historical review of women with vision who helped develop the musical performance groups at BYU, which have achieved high acclaim in the performing arts. Those in attendance heard some amazing music. We continued the year with a fun evening of watch- ing and cheering on the BYU Women’s Soccer Team.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of the Rivalry Between Jesse Knight and Thomas Nicholls Taylor on Architecture in Provo, Utah: 1896-1915
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1991 The Effect of the Rivalry Between Jesse Knight and Thomas Nicholls Taylor on Architecture in Provo, Utah: 1896-1915 Stephen A. Hales Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Mormon Studies Commons, and the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Hales, Stephen A., "The Effect of the Rivalry Between Jesse Knight and Thomas Nicholls Taylor on Architecture in Provo, Utah: 1896-1915" (1991). Theses and Dissertations. 4740. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4740 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. LZ THE EFFECT OF THE RIVALRY BETWEEN JESSE KNIGHT AND THOMAS NICHOLLS TAYLOR ON architecture IN PROVO UTAH 189619151896 1915 A thesis presented to the department of art brigham young university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of arts 0 stephen A hales 1991 by stephen A hales december 1991 this thesis by stephen A hales is accepted in its present form by the department of art of brigham young university as satisfying the thesis requirement for the degree master of arts i r rr f 1 C mark hamilton committee0amimmiweemee chilechair mark Johnjohndonjohnkonjohnmmitteekonoon committeec6mmittee
    [Show full text]
  • Study Appendices Unadopted)
    Adopted December 5, 2017 by Municipal Council Resolution #2017-58 (Study Appendices Unadopted) Page 1 of 12 Table of Contents Strategic Parking Management Plan 1. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Parking Program Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles ......................................................... 6 Strategic Parking Management Study Appendices A. Planning Context .......................................................................................................................... 14 B. Data Analysis and Parking Supply/Demand Assessment ...................................................... 18 C. Community Engagement ........................................................................................................... 31 D. Parking Expert Advisory Panel .................................................................................................... 66 E. Twenty Characteristics of Effective Parking Management Programs ................................ 79 F. Parking Program Management and Organization .............................................................. 101 G. Parking Program Action Items ................................................................................................. 120 H. Supplemental Appendices and Parking Management Toolbox ...................................... 136 Supplemental Appendices Supplemental Appendix 1 Supplemental Appendix 14 BYU Parking Data Missoula Parking Commission
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Traverse Mountain Health Consultation (HC)
    Health Consultation TRAVERSE MOUNTAIN: THALLIUM IN DRINKING WATER LEHI, UTAH COUNTY, UTAH Prepared by Utah Department of Health DECEMBER 3, 2014 Prepared under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Community Health Investigations Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Health Consultation: A Note of Explanation A health consultation is a verbal or written response from ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partners to a specific request for information about health risks related to a specific site, a chemical release, or the presence of hazardous material. In order to prevent or mitigate exposures, a consultation may lead to specific actions, such as restricting use of or replacing water supplies; intensifying environmental sampling; restricting site access; or removing the contaminated material. In addition, consultations may recommend additional public health actions, such as conducting health surveillance activities to evaluate exposure or trends in adverse health outcomes; conducting biological indicators of exposure studies to assess exposure; and providing health education for health care providers and community members. This concludes the health consultation process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the Agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. You May Contact ATSDR Toll Free at 1-800-CDC-INFO or Visit our Home Page at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov HEALTH CONSULTATION TRAVERSE MOUNTAIN: THALLIUM IN DRINKING WATER LEHI, UTAH COUNTY, UTAH Prepared By: Environmental Epidemiology Program Office of Epidemiology Utah Department of Health Under a Cooperative Agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Traverse Mountain / Lehi, Utah Health Consultation TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Route 834-Riverwoods/Provo Station 834
    For Information Call 801-RIDE-UTA (801-743-3882) outside Salt Lake County 888-RIDE-UTA (888-743-3882) Route 834-Riverwoods/Provo Station www.rideuta.com 834 HOW TO USE THIS SCHEDULE Orem City/Riverwoods/ Determine your timepoint based on when you want to Provo Central Station River P leave or when you want to arrive. Read across for your ark Dr destination and down for your time and direction of travel. Orem Public Library City Center Park A route map is provided to help you relate to the timepoints shown. Weekday, Saturday & Sunday schedules 300 W Center St differ from one another. T RT 850 Provo Riverwoods UTA SERVICE DIRECTORY Ÿ Stat General Information, Schedules, Trip Planning and Customer Feedback: 801-RIDE-UTA (801-743-3882) e St Orem Ÿ Outside Salt Lake County call 888-RIDE-UTA (888-743- 3882) Univ Ÿ For 24 hour automated service for next bus available T -Route Transfer point 3700 N use option 1. Have stop number and 3 digit route er sit number (use 0 or 00 if number is not 3 digits). y A Ÿ Pass By Mail Information 801-262-5626 v Jameston Square e Ÿ For Employment information please visit http://www.rideuta.com/careers/ Ÿ Travel Training 801-287-2275 LOST AND FOUND Weber/South Davis: 801-626-1207 option 3 Centennial MS Utah County: 801-227-8923 2230 N Salt Lake County: 801-287-4664 2230 N Station Univ Rt 831, UVX Wyview Apartments F-Route: 801-287-5355 T ersit y Pk Lavell Edwards FARES wy Stadium Exact Fare is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Consultation
    Health Consultation TRAVERSE MOUNTAIN: THALLIUM IN DRINKING WATER LEHI, UTAH COUNTY, UTAH Prepared by Utah Department of Health DECEMBER 3, 2014 Prepared under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Community Health Investigations Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Health Consultation: A Note of Explanation A health consultation is a verbal or written response from ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partners to a specific request for information about health risks related to a specific site, a chemical release, or the presence of hazardous material. In order to prevent or mitigate exposures, a consultation may lead to specific actions, such as restricting use of or replacing water supplies; intensifying environmental sampling; restricting site access; or removing the contaminated material. In addition, consultations may recommend additional public health actions, such as conducting health surveillance activities to evaluate exposure or trends in adverse health outcomes; conducting biological indicators of exposure studies to assess exposure; and providing health education for health care providers and community members. This concludes the health consultation process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the Agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. You May Contact ATSDR Toll Free at 1-800-CDC-INFO or Visit our Home Page at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov HEALTH CONSULTATION TRAVERSE MOUNTAIN: THALLIUM IN DRINKING WATER LEHI, UTAH COUNTY, UTAH Prepared By: Environmental Epidemiology Program Office of Epidemiology Utah Department of Health Under a Cooperative Agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Traverse Mountain / Lehi, Utah Health Consultation TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Management's Discussion and Analysis
    Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ending June 30, 2013 City of Provo, Utah Comprehensive Annual Financial Report City of Provo, Utah For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013 Prepared by the Provo City Finance Division PROVO CITY CORPORATION COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory Section Letter of Transmittal .................................................................................................................................................................1 GFOA Certificate of Achievement ...........................................................................................................................................8 Provo City Organizational Chart ..............................................................................................................................................9 Elected and Staff Positions ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 Financial Section Independent Auditors’ Report ................................................................................................................................................ 11 Management’s Discussion and Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 13 Basic Financial Statements Government-Wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]