Passport Volume V Issue I
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
EDGE of EXISTENCE 1Prioritising the Weird and Wonderful 3Making an Impact in the Field 2Empowering New Conservation Leaders A
EDGE OF EXISTENCE CALEB ON THE TRAIL OF THE TOGO SLIPPERY FROG Prioritising the Empowering new 10 weird and wonderful conservation leaders 1 2 From the very beginning, EDGE of Once you have identified the animals most in Existence was a unique idea. It is the need of action, you need to find the right people only conservation programme in the to protect them. Developing conservationists’ world to focus on animals that are both abilities in the countries where EDGE species YEARS Evolutionarily Distinct (ED) and Globally exist is the most effective and sustainable way to Endangered (GE). Highly ED species ensure the long-term survival of these species. have few or no close relatives on the tree From tracking wildlife populations to measuring of life; they represent millions of years the impact of a social media awareness ON THE of unique evolutionary history. Their campaign, the skill set of today’s conservation GE status tells us how threatened they champions is wide-ranging. Every year, around As ZSL’s EDGE of Existence conservation programme reaches are. ZSL conservationists use a scientific 10 early-career conservationists are awarded its first decade of protecting the planet’s most Evolutionarily framework to identify the animals that one of ZSL’s two-year EDGE Fellowships. With Making an impact are both highly distinct and threatened. mentorship from ZSL experts, and a grant to set in the field Distinct and Globally Endangered animals, we celebrate 10 The resulting EDGE species are unique up their own project on an EDGE species, each 3 highlights from its extraordinary work animals on the verge of extinction – the Fellow gains a rigorous scientific grounding Over the past decade, nearly 70 truly weird and wonderful. -
Annual Report 2012 English
Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2012 The Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund provides financial support to species conservation projects worldwide. In 2012, The Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund supported 217 projects in 75 countries with more than $1.5m. More than $1.36m was granted to species listed as Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable by the IUCN Red List. Your Highness In 2012 the Fund has been able to greatly aid the global effort to conserve the diversity of life by continuing its success and giving $1.5m to more than 200 projects worldwide. Since its inception, the Fund has now disbursed more than $8.7m to targeted species conservation work, implemented through nearly 825 projects in more than 125 countries across six continents. The impact of the Fund continues to amaze me. Among the more than 200 projects supported in 2012, the financial support provided by the Fund helped train a pilot in Kenya who is now patrolling rhino habitat for poachers; it helped locate the breeding grounds of a sea bird previously thought to be extinct; it aided in the discovery of several new tree species in Mexico and many new species of spiders in India; it protected the habitat of a butterfly in Nepal and that of a cave-dwelling amphibian in Croatia. The stories of success are replicated across many species, in many locations across the globe. In 2012, the Fund received more than 1,500 grant applications – a statistic clearly indicating the global urgency of species conservation and the popularity of the Fund. -
26Th International Congress for Conservation Biology
Program SocietySociety for for Conservation Conservation Biology Biology 26th International Congress for Conservation Biology Connecting Systems, Disciplines, and Stakeholders Baltimore, Maryland, USA • July 21-25, 2013 www.conbio.org/2013 Baltimore,2013 Maryland, USA Auckland,2011 New Zealand Edmonton,2010 Alberta, Canada Beijing,2009 China Chattanooga,2008 Tennessee, USA Port2007 Elizabeth, South Africa About the International Congress for Conservation Biology San2006 Jose, California, USA Welcome to our international forum for addressing conservation challenges. The International Congress for Conservation Biology Universidade2005 de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil is the global gathering spot for presenting and discussing new research and developments in conservation science and practice. From North America to Asia and Oceania to Europe, ICCB Columbia2004 University, New York, New York, USA moves around the world and is recognized as the most important global meeting for conservation professionals and students. University2003 of Minnesota, Duluth, Minnesota, USA Most importantly, the ICCB connects conservation professionals and serves as the premier networking opportunity for anyone University2002 of Kent at Canterbury, United Kingdom interested in conservation. University2001 of Hawaii, Hilo, Hawaii, USA About the Society for Conservation Biology Dedicated to advancing the science and practice of conserving University2000 of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA Earth’s biological diversity, SCB is a global community of conservation professionals -
27Th International Congress for Conservation Biology 4Th European Congress for Conservation Biology
27TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 4TH EUROPEAN CONGRESS FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY MISSION BIODIVERSITY: CHOOSING NEW PATHS FOR CONSERVATION MONTPELLIER, FRANCE 2-6 AUGUST 2015 MONTPELLIER, FRANCE 27TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 4 TH EUROPEAN CONGRESS FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY The International Congress for Conservation Biology and European Congress for Conservation Biology (ICCB- ECCB) is a forum for addressing conservation challenges and for presenting new research and developments in conservation science and practice. ICCB-ECCB connects our global community of conservation professionals and is the major networking outlet for anyone interested in conservation. The meeting theme, Mission Biodiversity: Choosing new paths for conservation, is a response to indications that many traditional methods for conserving biodiversity have proven unsuccessful. It emphasizes that rapid and ABOUT THE SOCIETY ongoing biophysical and societal changes affect the way FOR CONSERVATION we do science and practice conservation today. At ICCB- BIOLOGY ECCB we will ask very different questions than what we asked years ago. Increasingly we work with people from SCB is a global community of different disciplines such as computer science, economics, conservation professionals with and social science, among others. We face different members working in more than challenges like new pathogens and invasive species, new 100 countries who are dedicated drivers of habitat loss (e.g. oil palm in West Africa), and the to advancing the -
Lake Lerma Salamander, Ambystoma Lermaense
Lake Lerma Salamander, Ambystoma lermaense Compiler: Pelz Serrano K Contributors: List R. Suggested citation: Pelz Serrano K. (Compiler) 2016. A survival blueprint for Lake Lerma salamander (Ambystoma lermaense). The Zoological Society of London, London, UK. 1. STATUS REVIEW 1.1 Taxonomy: Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Cordata Class: Amphibia Order: Caudata Family: Ambystomatidae Scientific name: Ambystoma lermaense (Taylor, 1940) Synonym: Siredon lermaensis Taylor, 1940 Common name: Lake Lerma Salamander 1.2 Distribution and population status: 1.2.1 Global distribution: Country Population Distribution Population trend Notes estimate (plus references) (plus references) Mexico Unknown The three According to the wetlands that IUCN (2015) the form the current population Natural trend is decreasing. Protected (IUCN SSC Area: Área Amphibian de Specialist Group. Protección 2015. de Flora y Ambystoma lermaense. The Fauna IUCN Red List of Ciénegas del Threatened Lerma, and Species 2015) the Guadalupe Victoria wetland in the municipality of Capulhuac. 1.2.2 Local distribution: Country Region / Site Level of Population Reference(s) Notes province Protection size Mexico State of Natural Special Unknown Shaffer, H.B., Figure Mexico Protected protection by Parra-Olea, G. & 1 Area: Mexican Law Wake, D. 2008. Cienegas Ambystoma del Alto lermaense. The Lerma, IUCN Red List of and Threatened Guadalupe Species. Version Victoria 2015.2. wetland <www.iucnredlist. org>. Downloaded on 24 August 2015. SEMARNAT, DOF. (2010). Diario Oficial de la Federación. Norma Oficial Mexicana 059- SEMARNAT-2010. Protección ambiental- Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. Figure 1. The three wetlands that form part of the Natural Protected Area as well as the wetland Guadalupe Victoria where A. -
Taxonomic Revision of Species of Haematoloechus Looss, 1899
Zootaxa 4526 (3): 251–302 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4526.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4DF63CE5-4838-46CA-BB0E-2F91841D5CB1 Taxonomic revision of species of Haematoloechus Looss, 1899 (Digenea: Plagiorchioidea), with molecular phylogenetic analysis and the description of three new species from Mexico VIRGINIA LEÓN-RÈGAGNON1, 2 & JANET TOPAN2 1Estación de Biología Chamela, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, A.P. 21, San Patricio, Jalisco, México, CP 48980. E-mail: [email protected] 2Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada Abstract Lung flukes of the genus Haematoloechus Looss, 1899 are common parasites of anurans worldwide, but the taxonomy of the group has been confusing. In this taxonomic revision, 89 species of Haematoloechus (= Pneumonoeces Looss, 1902, Ostioloides Odening, 1960, Ostiolum Pratt, 1903, Skrjabinoeces Sudarikov, 1950, Neohaematoloechus Odening, 1960, Metahaematoloechus Yamaguti, 1971) are listed. Of these, 70 are considered valid, three are species inquirendae (H. legrandi Mañé–Garzón & Gil, 1959, H. latoricensis Kozák, 1968 & H. vitelloconfluentum (Rai, 1962) Saeed, Al–Barwari & Al-Harmni, 2007), one is a nomen nudum H. sudarikovi Belouss, 1962, 14 are junior synonyms and one belongs to Osti- oloides. This publication also describes three new species, H. occidentalis n. sp., H. veracruzanus n. sp. and H. mexicanus n. sp., parasitizing species of Rana Linnaeus in Mexico and redescribes Haematoloechus caballeroi (Skrjabin & Antipin, 1962) Yamaguti, 1971. The phylogenetic hypotheses based on sequences of mitochondrial and ribosomal DNA of Hae- matoloechus spp. -
A Conservation Checklist of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Mexico City, with Comparisons with Adjoining States
Denison University Denison Digital Commons Denison Faculty Publications 2020 A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states Julio A. Lemos-Espinal Geoffrey R. Smith Denison University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.denison.edu/facultypubs Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Lemos-Espinal, J. A., & Smith, G. R. (2020). A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico City, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys, 951, 109. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Denison Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denison Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Denison Digital Commons. ZooKeys 953: 137–159 (2020) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.953.50881 CHECKLIST https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states Julio A. Lemos-Espinal1, Geoffrey R. Smith2 1 Laboratorio de Ecología-UBIPRO, FES Iztacala UNAM, Avenida los Barrios 1, Los Reyes Iztacala, Tlalnepantla,edo. de México, 54090, México 2 Department of Biology, Denison University, Granville, Ohio 43023, USA Corresponding author: Julio A. Lemos-Espinal ([email protected]) Academic editor: Johannes Penner | Received 6 February 2020 | Accepted 19 June 2020 | Published 27 July 2020 http://zoobank.org/B7759B78-67B3-4F23-AE4C-79E929DC8855 Citation: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2020) A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the State of Mexico, Mexico with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 953: 137–159. https://doi.org/10.3897/ zookeys.953.50881 Abstract The State of Mexico has a unique combination of geographic characteristics and topography that pro- motes a high biodiversity. -
Northern Mexican Gartersnake (Thamnophis Eques Megalops) Species Profile
Northern Mexican Gartersnake (Thamnophis eques megalops) Species Profile Work conducted under LCR MSCP Work Task C3 September 2018 Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program Steering Committee Members Federal Participant Group California Participant Group Bureau of Reclamation California Department of Fish and Wildlife U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service City of Needles National Park Service Coachella Valley Water District Bureau of Land Management Colorado River Board of California Bureau of Indian Affairs Bard Water District Western Area Power Administration Imperial Irrigation District Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Palo Verde Irrigation District Arizona Participant Group San Diego County Water Authority Southern California Edison Company Arizona Department of Water Resources Southern California Public Power Authority Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern Arizona Game and Fish Department California Arizona Power Authority Central Arizona Water Conservation District Cibola Valley Irrigation and Drainage District Nevada Participant Group City of Bullhead City City of Lake Havasu City Colorado River Commission of Nevada City of Mesa Nevada Department of Wildlife City of Somerton Southern Nevada Water Authority City of Yuma Colorado River Commission Power Users Electrical District No. 3, Pinal County, Arizona Basic Water Company Golden Shores Water Conservation District Mohave County Water Authority Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District Native American Participant Group Mohave Water Conservation District North Gila Valley Irrigation and Drainage District Hualapai Tribe Town of Fredonia Colorado River Indian Tribes Town of Thatcher Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Town of Wickenburg Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District Unit “B” Irrigation and Drainage District Conservation Participant Group Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District Yuma County Water Users’ Association Ducks Unlimited Yuma Irrigation District Lower Colorado River RC&D Area, Inc. -
Final Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Aluminum 2018
United States Office of Water EPA-822-R-18-001 Environmental Protection 4304T December 2018 Agency FINAL AQUATIC LIFE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR ALUMINUM 2018 EPA-822-R-18-001 FINAL AQUATIC LIFE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR ALUMINUM - 2018 (CAS Registry Number 7429-90-05) December 2018 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF WATER OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA DIVISION WASHINGTON, D.C. ii NOTICES This document provides information to states and tribes authorized to establish water quality standards under the Clean Water Act (CWA), to protect aquatic life from toxic effects of aluminum. Under the CWA, states and tribes are to establish water quality criteria to protect designated uses. State and tribal decision makers retain the discretion to adopt approaches that are scientifically defensible that differ from these criteria to reflect site-specific conditions. While this document contains the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) scientific recommendations regarding ambient concentrations of aluminum that protect aquatic life, the Aluminum Criteria Document does not substitute for the CWA or the EPA’s regulations; nor is it a regulation itself. Thus, the document does not impose legally binding requirements on the EPA, states, tribes, or the regulated community, and might not apply to a particular situation based upon the circumstances. The EPA may update this document in the future. This document has been approved for publication by the Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. -
Draft Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Aluminum 2017
United States Office of Water EPA-822-P-17-001 Environmental Protection 4304T July 2017 Agency DRAFT AQUATIC LIFE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR ALUMINUM 2017 EPA-822-P-17-001 DRAFT AQUATIC LIFE AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR ALUMINUM - 2017 (CAS Registry Number 7429-90-05) July 2017 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF WATER OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA DIVISION WASHINGTON, D.C. ii NOTICES This document provides information to states and tribes authorized to establish water quality standards under the Clean Water Act (CWA), to protect aquatic life from toxic effects of aluminum. Under the CWA, states and tribes are to establish water quality criteria to protect designated uses. State and tribal decision makers retain the discretion to adopt approaches on a case-by-case basis that differ from these criteria when appropriate. While this document contains EPA’s scientific recommendations regarding ambient concentrations of aluminum that protect aquatic life, it does not substitute for the CWA or EPA’s regulations; nor is it a regulation itself. Thus, it cannot impose legally binding requirements on EPA, states, tribes, or the regulated community, and might not apply to a particular situation based upon the circumstances. EPA may change this document in the future. This document has been approved for publication by the Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This document can be downloaded from: https://www.epa.gov/wqc/aquatic-life-criteria-and-methods-toxics. -
Additional Research and Taxonomic Resolution of Salamanders (Amphibia: Caudata) from the Mio- Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, TN Hannah E
East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2015 Additional Research and Taxonomic Resolution of Salamanders (Amphibia: Caudata) from the Mio- Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, TN Hannah E. Darcy East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Darcy, Hannah E., "Additional Research and Taxonomic Resolution of Salamanders (Amphibia: Caudata) from the Mio-Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, TN" (2015). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2527. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2527 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Additional Research and Taxonomic Resolution of Salamanders (Amphibia: Caudata) from the Mio-Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, TN _____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences _____________________ by Hannah E. Darcy May 2015 _____________________ Jim I. Mead, Chair Blaine W. Schubert Steven C. Wallace Keywords: Ambystoma, Spelerpini, Gray Fossil Site, Miocene, Pliocene ABSTRACT Additional Research and Taxonomic Resolution of Salamanders (Amphibia: Caudata) from the Mio-Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, TN by Hannah E. Darcy The Gray Fossil Site (GFS), a Mio-Pliocene (4.5 – 7 Ma) locality in the southern Appalachians, boasts the most diverse pre-Pleistocene salamander fauna in North America: Desmognathus sp., Plethodon sp., Notophthalmus sp., a Spelerpinae-type plethodontid, and Ambystoma sp. -
Action Plan for Ex Situ Amphibian Conservation in the AZA Community
Action Plan for Ex Situ Amphibian Conservation in the AZA Community Compiled by: Paul Crump, Houston Zoo, Inc. and Shelly Grow, Association of Zoos & Aquariums with review by the Steering Committee of the 2007 Amphibian Taxon Advisory Group (ATAG). 14 September 2007 For more information about AZA and its amphibian programs, visit http://www.aza.org/ConScience/Amphibians_Intro/ 1 Table of Contents Background.................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 The Amphibian Ark Prioritization Tool for Ex Situ Conservation............................................................ 4 Conservation status of Canadian and US amphibians................................................................................. 5 Current amphibian ex situ activities in Canada and the US ...................................................................... 7 Species in captivity .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Institutional capacity ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Conservation Priorities ............................................................................................................................................11