Arxiv:1705.07243V2 [Math.GT] 30 Oct 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Trace Diagrams and Biquandle Brackets Sam Nelson⇤ Natsumi Oyamaguchi† Abstract We introduce a method of computing biquandle brackets of oriented knots and links using a type of decorated trivalent spatial graphs we call trace diagrams. We identify algebraic conditions on the biquandle bracket coefficients for moving strands over and under traces and identify a new stop condition for the recursive expansion. In the case of monochromatic crossings we show that biquandle brackets satisfy a Homflypt-style skein relation and we identify algebraic conditions on the biquandle bracket coefficients to allow pass-through trace moves. Keywords: Quantum enhancements, biquandles, biquandle counting invariants, biquandle brack- ets, trace diagrams 2010 MSC: 57M27, 57M25 1 Introduction Biquandles are a type of algebraic structure with axioms motivated by the Reidemeister moves in knot theory. More precisely, a biquandle is a set with two operations with axioms chosen so that the number of biquandle colorings or assignments of biquandle elements to the semiarcs in an oriented knot or link diagram satisfying certain conditions at crossings is the same for all diagrams of the given knot or link, thus defining Z a nonnegative integer-valued invariant of knots and links known as the biquandle counting invariant ΦX . An φ Z enhancement of the biquandle counting invariant is a stronger invariant ΦX which specializes to ΦX in some way, e.g. by taking a cardinality or evaluating at u = 1, etc. See [2, 3, 7] etc. for more about biquandles. Z In [8] a type of enhancement of ΦX was defined using skein relations with coefficients depending on the biquandle colors at a crossing. This setup poses an obvious objection: smoothings break the biquandle coloring. In [8] this problem is resolved by thinking of the invariant in state-sum form, doing all smoothings simultaneously to obtain states without biquandle colors. Generalizations of biquandle brackets have recently been described in papers such as [9] and [5]. In this paper we describe a method for computing biquandle bracket invariants recursively using a type of decorated trivalent spatial graph diagram called a trace diagram similar to diagrams used in e.g. [1] by defining biquandle colorings for these diagrams. We identify algebraic conditions on the biquandle bracket coefficients which are necessary and sufficient to allow moving strands over, under or through traces. As arXiv:1705.07243v2 [math.GT] 30 Oct 2017 an application we show that biquandle brackets satisfy a skein relation similar to that of the Homflypt polynomial [4] at monochromatic crossings, and we give an example to illustrate how this can be helpful for faster hand computations of the invariant. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we review biquandles, biquandle brackets and the biquandle bracket invariant. In Section 3 we introduce trace diagrams, their biquandle colorings and our method for computing biquandle bracket values recursively in terms of trace diagrams. We identify algebraic conditions for a biquandle bracket to admit overcrossing trace moves, undercrossing trace moves or both. In Section 4 we look at the special case of monochromatic crossings, identifying a Homflypt-style skein relation satisfied by all biquandle brackets as well as the algebraic conditions required for a biquandle bracket to admit pass- through trace moves at monochromatic crossings. We conclude in Section 5 with some questions for future work. ⇤Email: [email protected]. Partially supported by Simons Foundation collaboration grant 316709. †Email: [email protected]. 1 2 Biquandles and Biquandle Brackets In this section we briefly review biquandles and biquandle brackets; see [2, 8] for more. Definition 1. A biquandle is a set X with operations . , . : X X satisfying for all x, y, z X ! 2 (i) x . x = x . x, (ii) The maps ↵ , β : X X and S : X X X X given by x x ! ⇥ ! ⇥ ↵x(y)=y . x, βx(y)=y . x and S(x, y)=(y . x, x . y) are invertible, and (iii) We have the exchange laws (x . y) . (z . y)=(x . z) . (y . z) (x . y) . (z . y)=(x . z) . (y . z) (x . y) . (z . y)=(x . z) . (y . z). y It is sometimes convenient for the sake of space to write x . y as x and x . y as xy. Example 1. A useful class of biquandles is Alexander biquandles:letX be a module over the two-variable 1 1 Laurent polynomial ring Z[t± ,s± ] and define xy = tx +(s t)y and x = sx. − y One easily verifies that the biquandle axioms are satisfied. In particular, if X = Zn and s, t X are coprime to n,thenX is a linear Alexander biquandle. 2 The biquandle axioms are chosen so that given a coloring of an oriented link diagram L by a biquandle X, i.e., an assignment of elements of X to the semiarcs of L satisfying at every crossing the conditions before a Reidemeister move, there is a unique coloring of the diagram after the move which agrees with the pre-move coloring outside the neighborhood of the move. It follows that for a finite biquandle X,the number of X-colorings of an oriented link diagram is a link invariant. Indeed, it is not just the number of such colorings, but the set of such colorings for any fixed choice of diagram or, equivalently, the set of equivalence classes of colorings of diagrams of L, which is an invariant of links. In particular, if X is a finite biquandle, then the set of colorings of a (tame) oriented knot or link is finite and can be computed from a diagram, either by brute force counting or by using the structure of the biquandle where possible. Example 2. Let us compute the set of colorings of the trefoil knot 31 2 by the linear Alexander biquandle X = Z3 with t = 1 and s = 2. We have biquandle operations y x = x + y and xy =2x yielding system of coloring equations over Z3 2x = u x + y = w 2y = v y + z = u 2z = w x + z = v so the space of colorings is the kernel of the matrix 200200 100022 110002 010010 2 3 2 3 020020 row equiv. over 3 001001 − Z 6 0112007 ! 6 0001117 6 7 6 7 6 0020027 6 0000007 6 7 6 7 6 1010207 6 0000007 6 7 6 7 4 5 4 5 Z 2 given by Z[(1, 2, 0, 2, 1, 0), (1, 0, 2, 2, 0, 1)]. Then ΦX (31)=3 = 9. Alternatively, we can compute the set of colorings diagrammatically by checking which assignments of elements of X satisfy the coloring conditions at every crossing. Definition 2. A map f : X Y between biquandles is a homomorphism if we have ! f(x . x0)=f(x) . f(x0) and f(x . x0)=f(x) . f(x0) for all x, x0 X. 2 3 The set of X-colorings of a knot or link diagram L can be identified with the set of biquandle homomor- phisms f : (L) X from the the fundamental biquandle (L) of L, defined as the biquandle generated by the semiarcsB of L!modulo the crossing relations of L, to theB biquandle X. In particular, a coloring provides an image f(x ) X for each generator x of (L), defining a unique homomorphism f : (L) X if and j 2 j B B ! only if the crossing relations of L are satisfied. Thus, we have ΦZ (L)= Hom( (L),X) . For more see [2]. X | B | Definition 3. Now, let X be a biquandle and R a commutative ring with identity. A biquandle bracket over R is a pair of maps A, B : X X R⇥ assigning units Ax,y,Bx,y R to pairs of elements (x, y) X X such that the following conditions⇥ ! are satisfied: 2 2 ⇥ 2 1 (i) For all x X,theelements A B− are equal, with their common value denoted as w R; 2 − x,x x,x 2 1 1 (ii) For all x, y X,theelements Ax,y− Bx,y Ax,yBx,y− are equal, with their common value denoted as δ, and 2 − − (iii) For all x, y, z X we have 2 y z z Ax,yAy,zAx ,zy = Ax,zAyx,zx Ax ,y y z z Ax,yBy,zBx ,zy = Bx,zByx,zx Ax ,y y z z Bx,yAy,zBx ,zy = Bx,zAyx,zx Bx ,y y z z z z Ax,yAy,zBx ,zy = Ax,zByx,zx Ax ,y + Ax,zAyx,zx Bx ,y z z z z +δAx,zByx,zx Bx ,y + Bx,zByx,zx Bx ,y y y Bx,yAy,zAx ,zy + Ax,yBy,zAx ,zy y y z z +δBx,yBy,zAx ,zy + Bx,yBy,zBx ,zy = Bx,zAyx,zx Ax ,y . We can specify a biquandle bracket with an n 2n block matrix [A B]wherethe(i, j)-entries of A and B ⇥ | respectively are Axi,xj and Bxi,xj . See [8] for more. The biquandle bracket axioms are chosen so that the state-sum expansion of an X-colored oriented knot or link diagram Lf using the skein relations 4 with δ the value of a simple closed curve and w the value of a positive crossing is invariant under X-colored Reidemeister moves. More precisely, for each X-coloring Lf of an n-crossing diagram L: A state of L is a choice of C = A or B smoothing at every crossing j =1,...,n; • f j xy xy For each state we compute the product of the Cjs and δs for each component of the smoothed state, • and n p Multiply the sum of these over the set of states by the writhe correction factor w − where n, p are • the number of negative and positive crossings respectively, Obtaining the state-sum • n p β(L )=w − C δ .