Trace Diagrams and Biquandle Brackets
Sam Nelson⇤ Natsumi Oyamaguchi†
Abstract We introduce a method of computing biquandle brackets of oriented knots and links using a type of decorated trivalent spatial graphs we call trace diagrams. We identify algebraic conditions on the biquandle bracket coe cients for moving strands over and under traces and identify a new stop condition for the recursive expansion. In the case of monochromatic crossings we show that biquandle brackets satisfy a Homflypt-style skein relation and we identify algebraic conditions on the biquandle bracket coe cients to allow pass-through trace moves. Keywords: Quantum enhancements, biquandles, biquandle counting invariants, biquandle brack- ets, trace diagrams 2010 MSC: 57M27, 57M25
1 Introduction
Biquandles are a type of algebraic structure with axioms motivated by the Reidemeister moves in knot theory. More precisely, a biquandle is a set with two operations with axioms chosen so that the number of biquandle colorings or assignments of biquandle elements to the semiarcs in an oriented knot or link diagram satisfying certain conditions at crossings is the same for all diagrams of the given knot or link, thus defining Z a nonnegative integer-valued invariant of knots and links known as the biquandle counting invariant X . An Z enhancement of the biquandle counting invariant is a stronger invariant X which specializes to X in some way, e.g. by taking a cardinality or evaluating at u = 1, etc. See [2, 3, 7] etc. for more about biquandles. Z In [8] a type of enhancement of X was defined using skein relations with coe cients depending on the biquandle colors at a crossing. This setup poses an obvious objection: smoothings break the biquandle coloring. In [8] this problem is resolved by thinking of the invariant in state-sum form, doing all smoothings simultaneously to obtain states without biquandle colors. Generalizations of biquandle brackets have recently been described in papers such as [9] and [5]. In this paper we describe a method for computing biquandle bracket invariants recursively using a type of decorated trivalent spatial graph diagram called a trace diagram similar to diagrams used in e.g. [1] by defining biquandle colorings for these diagrams. We identify algebraic conditions on the biquandle bracket coe cients which are necessary and su cient to allow moving strands over, under or through traces. As arXiv:1705.07243v2 [math.GT] 30 Oct 2017 an application we show that biquandle brackets satisfy a skein relation similar to that of the Homflypt polynomial [4] at monochromatic crossings, and we give an example to illustrate how this can be helpful for faster hand computations of the invariant. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we review biquandles, biquandle brackets and the biquandle bracket invariant. In Section 3 we introduce trace diagrams, their biquandle colorings and our method for computing biquandle bracket values recursively in terms of trace diagrams. We identify algebraic conditions for a biquandle bracket to admit overcrossing trace moves, undercrossing trace moves or both. In Section 4 we look at the special case of monochromatic crossings, identifying a Homflypt-style skein relation satisfied by all biquandle brackets as well as the algebraic conditions required for a biquandle bracket to admit pass- through trace moves at monochromatic crossings. We conclude in Section 5 with some questions for future work.
⇤Email: [email protected]. Partially supported by Simons Foundation collaboration grant 316709. †Email: [email protected].
1 2 Biquandles and Biquandle Brackets
In this section we briefly review biquandles and biquandle brackets; see [2, 8] for more. Definition 1. A biquandle is a set X with operations . , . : X X satisfying for all x, y, z X ! 2 (i) x . x = x . x, (ii) The maps ↵ , : X X and S : X X X X given by x x ! ⇥ ! ⇥ ↵x(y)=y . x, x(y)=y . x and S(x, y)=(y . x, x . y) are invertible, and (iii) We have the exchange laws (x . y) . (z . y)=(x . z) . (y . z) (x . y) . (z . y)=(x . z) . (y . z) (x . y) . (z . y)=(x . z) . (y . z).
y It is sometimes convenient for the sake of space to write x . y as x and x . y as xy. Example 1. A useful class of biquandles is Alexander biquandles:letX be a module over the two-variable 1 1 Laurent polynomial ring Z[t± ,s± ] and define xy = tx +(s t)y and x = sx. y One easily verifies that the biquandle axioms are satisfied. In particular, if X = Zn and s, t X are coprime to n,thenX is a linear Alexander biquandle. 2 The biquandle axioms are chosen so that given a coloring of an oriented link diagram L by a biquandle X, i.e., an assignment of elements of X to the semiarcs of L satisfying at every crossing the conditions
before a Reidemeister move, there is a unique coloring of the diagram after the move which agrees with the pre-move coloring outside the neighborhood of the move. It follows that for a finite biquandle X,the number of X-colorings of an oriented link diagram is a link invariant. Indeed, it is not just the number of such colorings, but the set of such colorings for any fixed choice of diagram or, equivalently, the set of equivalence classes of colorings of diagrams of L, which is an invariant of links. In particular, if X is a finite biquandle, then the set of colorings of a (tame) oriented knot or link is finite and can be computed from a diagram, either by brute force counting or by using the structure of the biquandle where possible.
Example 2. Let us compute the set of colorings of the trefoil knot 31
2 by the linear Alexander biquandle X = Z3 with t = 1 and s = 2. We have biquandle operations
y x = x + y and xy =2x yielding system of coloring equations over Z3 2x = u x + y = w 2y = v y + z = u 2z = w x + z = v so the space of colorings is the kernel of the matrix
200200 100022 110002 010010 2 3 2 3 020020 row equiv. over 3 001001 Z 6 0112007 ! 6 0001117 6 7 6 7 6 0020027 6 0000007 6 7 6 7 6 1010207 6 0000007 6 7 6 7 4 5 4 5 Z 2 given by Z[(1, 2, 0, 2, 1, 0), (1, 0, 2, 2, 0, 1)]. Then X (31)=3 = 9. Alternatively, we can compute the set of colorings diagrammatically by checking which assignments of elements of X satisfy the coloring conditions at every crossing.
Definition 2. A map f : X Y between biquandles is a homomorphism if we have !
f(x . x0)=f(x) . f(x0) and f(x . x0)=f(x) . f(x0) for all x, x0 X. 2
3 The set of X-colorings of a knot or link diagram L can be identified with the set of biquandle homomor- phisms f : (L) X from the the fundamental biquandle (L) of L, defined as the biquandle generated by the semiarcsB of L!modulo the crossing relations of L, to theB biquandle X. In particular, a coloring provides an image f(x ) X for each generator x of (L), defining a unique homomorphism f : (L) X if and j 2 j B B ! only if the crossing relations of L are satisfied. Thus, we have Z (L)= Hom( (L),X) . For more see [2]. X | B | Definition 3. Now, let X be a biquandle and R a commutative ring with identity. A biquandle bracket over R is a pair of maps A, B : X X R⇥ assigning units Ax,y,Bx,y R to pairs of elements (x, y) X X such that the following conditions⇥ ! are satisfied: 2 2 ⇥
2 1 (i) For all x X,theelements A B are equal, with their common value denoted as w R; 2 x,x x,x 2 1 1 (ii) For all x, y X,theelements Ax,y Bx,y Ax,yBx,y are equal, with their common value denoted as , and 2 (iii) For all x, y, z X we have 2
y z z Ax,yAy,zAx ,zy = Ax,zAyx,zx Ax ,y y z z Ax,yBy,zBx ,zy = Bx,zByx,zx Ax ,y y z z Bx,yAy,zBx ,zy = Bx,zAyx,zx Bx ,y y z z z z Ax,yAy,zBx ,zy = Ax,zByx,zx Ax ,y + Ax,zAyx,zx Bx ,y z z z z + Ax,zByx,zx Bx ,y + Bx,zByx,zx Bx ,y y y Bx,yAy,zAx ,zy + Ax,yBy,zAx ,zy y y z z + Bx,yBy,zAx ,zy + Bx,yBy,zBx ,zy = Bx,zAyx,zx Ax ,y .
We can specify a biquandle bracket with an n 2n block matrix [A B]wherethe(i, j)-entries of A and B ⇥ | respectively are Axi,xj and Bxi,xj . See [8] for more. The biquandle bracket axioms are chosen so that the state-sum expansion of an X-colored oriented knot or link diagram Lf using the skein relations
4 with the value of a simple closed curve and w the value of a positive crossing
is invariant under X-colored Reidemeister moves. More precisely, for each X-coloring Lf of an n-crossing diagram L: A state of L is a choice of C = A or B smoothing at every crossing j =1,...,n; • f j xy xy For each state we compute the product of the Cjs and s for each component of the smoothed state, • and
n p Multiply the sum of these over the set of states by the writhe correction factor w where n, p are • the number of negative and positive crossings respectively, Obtaining the state-sum •
n p (L )=w C . f 00 j1 1 states components ! X smoothingsY Y @@ A A Then the multiset of such state-sum values over the set of X-colorings is the biquandle bracket multiset ,M invariant of L with respect to the biquandle X and bracket , denoted X (L). It is common practice to convert the multiset invariant to a “polynomial” form by writing the elements of the multiset as exponents of a dummy variable u with multiplicities as coe cients, e.g. converting 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 5 to 2 + 3u + u5. { } 1 2 1 2 Example 3. Let X = 1, 2 with 1 =1 =11 =12 = 2 and 2 =2 =21 =22 = 1 and R = Z7. Then one verifies that the matrix{ } 1625 4112 defines a biquandle bracket with = 1(2) 1(4) = 6 = 1 and w = 124= 4 = 3. The Hopf link below has four X-colorings
each of which expands to four states with coe cients and state-sums as pictured.
5 The the state-sums are
0 1 2 2 2 2 2 = w ( A11 +2 A11B11 + B11) B C B C B C B C @ A 2 2 2 2 2 =3 (1 1 + (1)(1)(2) + (1)(2)(1) + 1 2 )=1,
0 1 2 2 2 = w ( A A + A B + B A + B B ) B C 12 21 12 21 12 21 12 21 B C B C B C B C B C 2 2 2 @ A =3 (1 (6)(4) + (1)(6)(1) + (1)(5)(4) + 1 (5)(1)) = 3,
0 1 2 2 2 = w ( A21A12 + A21B12 + B21A12 + B21B12) B C B C B C B C @ A 2 2 2 =3 (1 (4)(6) + (1)(1)(6) + (1)(4)(5) + 1 (1)(5)) = 3,
0 1 2 2 + 2 2 = w ( A22 A22B22 + B22A21 + B22) B C B C B C B C @ A 2 2 2 2 2 =3 (1 (1) + (1)(1)(2) + (1)(2)(1) + 1 (2) )=1.
6 Then the multiset invariant is ,M (L)= 1, 1, 3, 3 or in polynomial form, (L)=2u +2u3. X { } X 3 Trace Diagrams
In this section we introduce a method for computing this invariant recursively by applying the skein expansion one crossing at a time as opposed to the state-sum method of performing all smoothings simultaneously. To this end we introduce trace diagrams.
Definition 4. A trace diagram is a planar diagram with crossings and signed traces: (i) A crossing is a degree four vertex with pass-through orientation and crossing information, i.e. pairs of edges resolve into an oriented over-crossing strand and an oriented under-crossing strand as depicted:
(ii) The degree three vertices have two oriented edges and one unoriented dashed edge called a trace, decorated with a + or sign as depicted; we require that each trace either connects two parallel oriented pass-through vertices or connects a bivalent sink to a bivalent source so that the neighborhood of each trace is as depicted. We will refer to the former as type A traces and the later as type B traces.
Unsigned trace diagrams have appeared in the literature before, with traces recording the sites of smooth- ings in the Kau↵man bracket expansion of a knot or link. Our general idea is that a trace with a + or sign respectively will act like a positive or negative crossing respectively for the purposes of biquandle colorings and Reidemeister moves. More precisely, a biquandle coloring of a trace diagram by a biquandle X is an assignment of elements of X to the directed edges in X such that the crossing conditions from section 2 and following conditions at every trace are satisfied:
7 Definition 5. Let X be a finite biquandle, R a commutative ring with identity and an X-bracket over R. Define a map [ ] : X R from the set of X-colored oriented trace diagrams X to R recursively by the rules L ! L (i)
and
n p k (ii) If D is a trace diagram with no crossings, then [D]=w where n is the number of negative traces, p is the number of positive traces and k is the number of components (i.e., simple closed curves) in the diagram obtained by deleting all the of the traces in D.
Observation 1. If D and D0 are two X-colored trace diagrams which Are identical outside a neighborhood N, • Have the same connectivity on the boundary of N, i.e., points of @N which are connected by strands • inside D after traces are deleted are connected inside D0 after traces are deleted and points of @N which are not connected inside D after traces are deleted are not connected inside D0 after traces are deleted, and
Have equal contributions of coe cients, sandws, • then [D]=[D0].
8 It then follows easily that:
Proposition 1. For any finite biquandle X and X-colored oriented link diagram L , the value [L ] R is f f 2 unchanged by Reidemeister moves. In particular, we have [Lf ]= (Lf ). Thus, trace diagrams give us a way of doing skein expansion of biquandle bracket invariants recursively like we do with classical skein invariants in a way that preserves the biquandle colorings. However, this is somewhat unsatisfying since the main advantage of the recursive skein expansion is the ability to smooth, then apply Reidemeister moves to simplify the diagram before doing additional smoothings. While we can perform Reidemeister moves on trace diagrams, so far we have only allowed genuine Reidemeister moves not involving traces, i.e., moves we could have already performed prior to smoothing. Hence we ask, what happens when we move a strand of a trace diagram past a trace? There are 16 possible oriented trace moves, each of which imposes one of two possible sets of conditions on the biquandle bracket coe cients. We note that for each move involving a trace of type A there is a corresponding move obtained by replacing the type A trace with a type B trace.
9 10 Theorem 2. The necessary and su cient conditions for moving a strand over a trace of type A are the same as those for moving a strand over a trace of type B, namely with colors (x, y, z) as depicted above, the coe cients must satisfy the conditions
z z y y Ax,y = Ax ,y and Ay,zBx ,zy = Bx,zAyx,zx = Ax,zByx,zx = By,zAx ,zy . The necessary and su cient conditions for moving a strand under a trace of type A are the same as those for moving a strand under a trace of type B, namely with colors (x, y, z) as depicted above, the coe cients must the coe cients satisfy the conditions
y z z z z y Ay,z = Ayx,zx and Ax,yBx ,zy = Bx,zAx ,y = Ax,zBx ,y = Bx,yAx ,zy . Proof. We consider the case of undercrossing moves; the overcrossing case is similar. Consider the move U TrA I with the strands colored as depicted.
The two sides expand to
and
. Comparing coe cients of diagrams with the same boundary connectivity and writhe information, we obtain the requirements that for all x, y, z X we have 2
y z z Ax,yAx ,zy = Ax,zAx ,y (i) y z z Ax,yBx ,zy = Ax,zBx ,y (ii) y z z Bx,yAx ,zy = Bx,zAx ,y (iii) and y z z Bx,yBx ,zy = Bx,zBx ,y (iv). Suppose we have a biquandle bracket satisfying (i) through (iv). Equations (i) and (iv) are equivalent via
y z z y z z the biquandle bracket axioms Ax,yAy,zAx ,zy = Ax,zAyx,zx Ax ,y and Bx,yAy,zBx ,zy = Bx,zAyx,zx Bx ,y to
11 Ay,z = Ayx,zx . To see that the left sides of equations (ii) and (iii) represent equal elements of R, consider the biquandle bracket axiom
y z z z z z z z z Ax,yAy,zBx ,zy = Ax,zByx,zx Ax ,y + Ax,zAyx,zx Bx ,y + Ax,zByx,zx Bx ,y + Bx,zByx,zx Bx ,y .
y z z y z z Since Ay,z = Ayx,zx and Ax,yBx ,zy = Ax,zBx ,y ,wehaveAx,yAy,zBx ,zy = Ax,zAyx,zx Bx ,y and our equation reduces to