DOCSLIB.ORG

POAL Attachment 3 Engagement Log Summary EEZ400011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
POAL Attachment 3 Engagement Log Summary EEZ400011 Disposal of Dredged Material Engagement Log Summary Purpose The purpose of this document is to outline the key discussion points from consultation with stakeholders regarding responsible disposal of dredged material. Overview Consultation began with specific stakeholders in July, 2018. This engagement include a letter and information booklet, stating our intentions and encouraging feedback. In the first instance, our consultation focussed on Iwi, Hapu and Maori Organisations with interests ranging from Whangarei to the Bay of Plenty. This was then broadened to include those with fishing interests in, or near the proposed disposal site, as well as regional councils in the specified region. Engagement Summary Below is a summarized table of discussion points – Organisation Discussion Points Engagement Actions Hauraki Maori Trust • Access to technical Reports • Technical reports to be provided when available Board • Facilitating a Hui including HMTB • POAL to present to HMTB members – HMTB then cancelled members • POAL confirmed not directly involved with CRL application at present • Clarifying POAL association to Coastal Resources Limited EPA application Te Rūnanga o Ngāti • Defer to the Mana Whenua interests in • Action only required if requested by disposal site Mana Whenua Whātua the locality of the proposed site in Ports of Auckland I Disposal of Dredged Material – Engagement Log Summary 1 anticipation of their provision of an appropriate response accordingly • We also anticipate that our future involvement will be determined following due consideration by those entities Te Rūnanga o Ngāti • Erosive impacts on our land that the • Technical reports to be provided when available Manawa movement of water in particular and including other weather events that • Further consultation at their request contribute to the pollution of the sea • Do not support the concept of taking our ‘rubbish’ and dumping it somewhere else - more supportive of a land based option • Access to technical Reports – water quality, resources, ecology and monitoring • Site selection • Dredged material should not be applied until a full ecological report is completed with projections over a 5, 10, 20 year time line Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa • Biosecurity concerns regarding • Technical reports to be provided when available • Supportive of the Disposal Management • Further consultation at their request Plan • Consent conditions should impose regular and on-going monitoring and reporting • Runanga engaged with Ngati Awa Customary Fisheries Authority Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki Tribal • Access to technical Reports • Technical reports to be provided when available Trust • Volume • Further consultation at their request, and regarding other POAL projects • Further engagement regarding other POAL projects LegaSea • Disposal site specifications • Technical reports to be provided when available • POAL confirmed not directly involved with CRL application at present Ports of Auckland I Disposal of Dredged Material – Engagement Log Summary 2 • Previous contents disposed of at proposed disposal site • Disposal site ecology • Clarifying POAL association to Coastal Resources Limited EPA application SeaChange • International dredging examples • POAL to facilitate public meeting at MBGFC • Mercury Bay Game Fishing Club meeting proposed Mercury Bay Game • Commitment to dispose in specified area • POAL to provide responses to discussion points Fishing Club • Disposal site is well known locally as a • POAL to provide electronic copies of technical reports favoured fishing location – especially just below the surface at 10m depth • All feedback to be provided to MBGFC Club Manager, Alan Proctor • Restricting disposal to preferable times • POAL to model disposal timings outside of local recreational fishing • POAL to investigate dredge assistance season • Identified good fishing spots southwest of the centre of the disposal site to be avoided if possible – knolls and high spots are good for fishing • Recommendation to dispose in shallower water to increase the sediment falling in the same area – less opportunity for current to spread • Local commercial fishing effort outside of proposed area and not at depth of sediment resting place • Well assured in level of detail and understanding of the site – well commended • Request for dredge assistance in Whitianga Ports of Auckland I Disposal of Dredged Material – Engagement Log Summary 3 Engagement Contact List Organisations were identified by their geographical and potential operational interests within the designated disposal site. These are identified in the below table – Organisation Interest Key Contact Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whātua Maori Relations Tame Te Rangi Te Uri o Hau Settlement Trust Maori Relations Russell Kemp Ngāti Wai Trust Maori Relations Clive Stone Ngāti Paoa Trust Board Maori Relations Jamie Forsman Ngāti Tamterā Treaty Settlement Trust Maori Relations Liane Ngamane Ngāti Whanaunga Incorporated Society Maori Relations Boni Renata Te Patukirikiri Iwi Inc Maori Relations William Peters Ngāti Manuhiri Settlement Trust Maori Relations Fiona McKenzie Ngāti Tamaoho Trust Maori Relations Lucie Rutherfurd Waikato - Tainui Te Kauhanganui Incorporated Maori Relations Tim Manukau Ngā Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara Development Trust Maori Relations Georgina Parata Ngāti Whātua o Ōrākei Māori Trust Board Maori Relations Pani Gleeson Ngāti Rehua - Ngatiwai Ki Aotea Trust Maori Relations Ngaire Pera Te Kawerau Iwi Tribal Authority Maori Relations Scott Lomas Te Ākitai Waiohau Iwi Authority Maori Relations Nigel Denny Ngāti Te Ata Claims Support whānau Trust Maori Relations Josie Smith Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Pū Maori Relations Ted Shaw Ngāti Maru ki Hauraki Inc Maori Relations William Peters Ngāti Pūkenga ki Manaia Mgmt Committee Maori Relations Harry Mikaere Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki Tribal Trust Maori Relations Anne McLeod Ngāti Hako Treaty Settlement Negotiators Maori Relations Josie Anderson Te Kupenga o Ngāti Hako Inc Maori Relations Pauline Clarkin Ngāti Maru (Hauraki) Treaty Settlement Negotiators Maori Relations William Peters Ngāti Paoa Iwi Trust Board Maori Relations Jamie Forsman Ngāti Tamaterā Treaty Settlement Trust Maori Relations Lianne Ngamane Ngāti Tara Tokanui Treaty Settlement Negotiators Maori Relations Russell Karu Ngāti Tumtumu Ngāti Rāhiri Settlements Committee Maori Relations Greg Thorne Ngāti Hei Treaty Settlement Negotiators Maori Relations Peter Matai Johnston Ngāti Hei Charitable Trust Maori Relations Gary Neal Te Au Māro o Ngāti Pūkenga Maori Relations Areta Gray Hauraki Māori Trust Board Maori Relations John McEnteer Te Runanaga o Ngāi Te Rangi Iwi Trust Maori Relations Reon Tuanau Tapuika Iwi Authority Trust Maori Relations Hohepa Maxwell Ports of Auckland I Disposal of Dredged Material – Engagement Log Summary 4 Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa Maori Relations Keri Topperwien Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Manawa Maori Relations Maramena Vercoe Tūhoe - Te Uru Taumatua Maori Relations Tamati Kruger Ngāitai Iwi Authority Maori Relations Tangi Tipene Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whare Maori Relations David Carson Whakatōhea Māori Trust Board Maori Relations Robert Edwards Raukawa Charitable Trust Maori Relations Kim Blomfield Ranginui Fisheries Trust Maori Relations Christopher Stokes Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Fisheries Trust Maori Relations Holden Hohaia Ngāti Pūkenga Iwi ki Tauranga Trust Maori Relations Rehua Smallman Te Kotahitanga o Te Arawa Waka Fisheries Trust Board Maori Relations Ron Roberts Te Rūnanga o Te Whānau Apanui Maori Relations Matetu Herewini Ngāti Whātua Maori Relations Tame Te Rangi Ngapuhi, Ngati Wai, Haki Pereki and Ngawhetu Sadler Whanau Trust Maori Relations Te Kiripute Sadler Te Whanau Ā Haunui (Royal family) Maori Relations Antony Royal Fisheries Scott Macindoe Trish Rea Legasea John Holdsworth Joshua Barclay Fisheries Alison Henry Seachange Dirk Sieling Raewyn Peart Fisheries Michelle Cherrington Moana Nathan Reid Katherine Short Sanford Fisheries Fiona MacMillan Waikato Regional Council Local Council Peter Stevens Thames Coromandel District Council Local Council Andrew Boden Engagement Response Summary The table below highlights the number of engagement attempts made by POAL, and the corresponding response rate. This was for the initial consultation letter and follow-up emails only. This does not include general emails or related phone calls, as these are summarised in the appendix below. Note – The ‘meeting’ method is measured by attendance. Three meetings were scheduled, with one being cancelled by the hosting party, not POAL. Methods Attempts Responses/Attendees Response Rate Letter 47 5 10.6% Ports of Auckland I Disposal of Dredged Material – Engagement Log Summary 5 Email 103 11 10.7% Meeting 3 21 N/A This document is updated as at November 1, 2018. Ports of Auckland I Disposal of Dredged Material – Engagement Log Summary 6 Appendix The appendix includes all relevant documents relating to discussion points and the organisation of key meetings. Item 1 – Consultation Letter Ports of Auckland I Disposal of Dredged Material – Engagement Log Summary 7 Item 2 – Information Pamphlet Ports of Auckland I Disposal of Dredged Material – Engagement Log Summary 8 Ports of Auckland I Disposal of Dredged Material – Engagement Log Summary 9 Ports of Auckland I Disposal of Dredged Material – Engagement Log Summary 10 Item 3 – Standard Follow-up Email #1 Item 4 – Standard Follow-up Email #2 Ports of Auckland I Disposal of Dredged Material – Engagement Log Summary 11 Item 5 – Hauraki Maori Trust Board Ports of Auckland I Disposal of Dredged Material
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Te Kāuru Taiao Strategy
    TE KĀURU EASTERN MANAWATŪ RIVER HAPŪ COLLECTIVE Te Kāuru Taiao Strategy TE KĀURU For The Eastern Manawatū River Catchment NOVEMBER 2016 First Edition: November 2016 Published by: Te Kāuru Eastern Manawatū River Hapū Collective 6 Ward Street PO Box 62 Dannevirke New Zealand Copyright © 2016 Te Kāuru Eastern Manawatū River Hapū Collective Acknowledgments The development of the ‘Te Kāuru Taiao Strategy’ is a tribute to all those who have been and those who are still collectively involved. This document provides strategies and actions for caring for the land, rivers, streams, all resident life within our environment, and our people in the Eastern Manawatū River Catchment. TE KĀURU EASTERN MANAWATŪ RIVER HAPŪ COLLECTIVE Te Kāuru Taiao Strategy Endorsements This strategy has been endorsed by the following 11 hapū of Te Kāuru who are shown with their respective tribal affiliation. A two tier rationale has been used (where required) to identify the Te Kāuru hapū members in terms of their customary connections with regards to their locality, occupation and connection with the Manawatū River and its tributaries: 1. Take ahikāroa 2. Tātai hono Ngāti Mārau (Rangitāne, Kahungunu) Ngāi Te Rangitotohu (Rangitāne, Kahungunu) Ngāi Tahu (Rangitāne, Kahungunu) Ngāti Ruatōtara (Rangitāne) Ngāti Te Opekai (Rangitāne) Ngāti Parakiore (Rangitāne) Ngāti Pakapaka (Rangitāne) Ngāti Mutuahi (Rangitāne) Ngāti Te Koro (Rangitāne) Te Kapuārangi (Rangitāne) Ngāti Hāmua (Rangitāne) Te Kāuru has hapū mana whenua membership of the Manawatū River Leaders’ Forum and will continue to support the ongoing efforts to restore and revitalise the mauri of the Manawatū River. Te Kāuru further support the integration of the Taiao Strategy into the wider Iwi/Hapū Management Plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman's Report
    CHAIRMAN'S 05 REPORT 10 F E E S & Building the 06 07 ATTENDANCE INTRODUCTION TRUSTEES Hauraki nation, 10 STRATEGY IWI REGISTER 12 & PLANNING together! 13 14 24 ASSETS INTERACTIONS FINANCIALS - IWI, MARAE,MATAURANGA EDUCATION & SPORTS 48 16 GRANTS SCORECARD Ngā Puke ki Hauraki ka tarehu Nga mihinui Kia koutou i tenei wa As other opportunities come our way in E mihi ana ki te whenua aquaculture and fin fish farming we look forward On behalf of the Trustees of the Pare Hauraki to working alongside the company to realise the E tangi ana ki te tangata Fishing Trust I am pleased to present this Annual potential of those opportunities and to enable Report for 1st October 2017 to 30th September further economic growth and opportunities for E ngā mana, e ngā Iwi, 2018. business and employment for our people in the future. E ngā uri o ngā Iwi o Hauraki The Trust’s fundamental function is to provide the Iwi, Marae Development, Education, Mātauranga Because of the strength of our collective fisheries Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, (Culture & Arts) and Sports grants on an annual assets we are having a strong influence in basis. This has been a very good way to assist our aquaculture and fisheries development across our Tēnā tātou katoa. people of Ngā Iwi o Hauraki and our many Marae. rohe and the country. Our Annual Report identifies where those grants As we need necessary infrastructure to support were allocated and their purpose and it will be our growth we are also engaging strongly great to hear from some of those recipients at our with Local and Central Government to work Annual General Meeting as we have heard from collaboratively to secure resource, particularly other recipients in previous years.
    [Show full text]
  • Ka Pu Te Ruha, Ka Hao Te Rangatahi Annual Report 2020 Nga Rarangi Take
    Nga Rarangi Take Ka Pu Te Ruha, Ka Hao Te Rangatahi Annual Report 2020 Nga Rarangi Take Ka Pu Te Ruha, Ka Hao Te Rangatahi When the old net is cast aside, the new net goes fishing, our new strategy remains founded on our vision. Nga Rarangi Take CONTENTS Nga Rarangi Take Introduction/Snapshot 4 Te Arawa 500 scholarships 26 Highlights - 2020 5 Iwi Partnership Grants Programme 27 Your Te Arawa Fisheries 6 Te Arawa Mahi 28 Our Mission/Vision 8 INDIGI-X 29 Message form the Chair 9 Looking to the Future 30 CEO’s Report 10 Research and Development 31 COVID-19 11 Smart Māori Aquaculture Ngā Iwi i Te Rohe o Te Waiariki 32 Rotorua Business Awards Finalist 12 Ka Pu Te Ruha, Ka Hao te Rangatahi Taking our Strategy to the next level 14 Te Arawa Fisheries Climate Change Strategy 34 Governance Development 16 Aka Rākau Strategic Partnerships and Investing for the Future 18 Te Arawa Carbon Forestry Offset Programme 36 Te Arawa Fresh - What Lies Beneath 20 Te Arawa Fresh Online 21 APPENDIX 1: T500 Recipients 38 Our People 22 APPENDIX 2: 2019-2020 Pataka Kai Recipients 40 Our Team 22 APPENDIX 3: AGM Minutes of the Meeting for Te Arawa Fisheries 42 Diversity Report 24 Financial Report 2020 45 Our board of trustees: from left to right. Tangihaere MacFarlane (Ngati Rangiwewehi), Christopher Clarke (Ngati Rangitihi), Blanche Reweti (Ngati Tahu/Whaoa), Dr Kenneth Kennedy (Ngati Rangiteaorere), back Willie Emery (Ngati Pikiao), in front of Dr Ken Roku Mihinui (Tuhourangi), Paeraro Awhimate (Ngati makino), in front Pauline Tangohau (Te Ure o Uenukukopako), behind Punohu McCausland (Waitaha), Tere Malcolm (Tarawhai) Nga Rarangi Take Introduction/Snapshot Timatanga Korero e Kotahitanga o Te Arawa Waka Fisheries Trust Board was legally established on T19 December 1995 by a deed of trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Whenua 0 Te Kupuwhakaari
    , TE WHENUA 0 TE KUPUWHAKAARI NGAl TAMA RAWAHO . WAlTANGl659 NGAI TAMA RAWAHO REPORT AN OVERVIEW REPORT COMMISSIONED BY THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL NA TE ROPU WHAKA NOARAUPATU 0 NGAI TAMA RAWAHO GEORGE MATUA EVANS OCTOBER 1997 2 A REPORT ON NGAI TAMA RAWAHO WAI 659 CLAIM A report commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal for the Tauranga claim (Wai 215) Any conclusion drawn or opinions expressed are those of the author 3 CONTENT Part 1 INTRODUCTION 1. 1 Acknowledgments 1.2 The author 1. 3 The claim Partn NGAI TAMA RAWAHO 2.1 Te Pou Toko Manawa 2.2 Kinonui 2.3 Ngai Tama Rawaho Hapu 2.4 Contempory Settlement 2.5 Ngai Tama Rawaho, Nga Whenua Toenga (The remanent lands) 2.6 Te Rii 0 Ngai Tama Rawaho 2.7 Ahu Whenua 2.8 Taonga KumaraIMaara 2.9 Estuaries Taonga Kaimoana Partm TE MURU 0 TE PAPA 3 . 1 The Church Missionary Society's acquisition of Te Papa 3.2 Governor Gore Brown's Despatch to the Duke of Newcastle 3 .3 Lands Claims Ordinance 1841 3.4 Turton's Deeds 3.5 Brown's Letters to Williams Part IV NGAI TAMA RAWABO AND KINGITANGA 4.1 Kingitanga 4.2 Enactments which impacted uponNgai Tama Rawaho 4.3 Kawanatanga 4.4 Military intervention 4.5 The Cession, its impact upon Ngai Tama Rawaho 4.6 Tirohanga, Ruritia (To view, to site noting aspect - to survey) 4.7 Ngai Tama Rawaho mai Kinonui, Ngaiterangi ki Te Kawana (from Kinonui Ngaiterangi is to the Crown) 4.8 Te Hoko 0 Te Puna Katikati Block 4.9 Crown Grants to Maori - Otumoetai Part V PRIVATISATION OF THE TRIBAL ESTATE 5.1 Reserves and allotments 5.2 Partitions identifying allotments returned to Ngai
    [Show full text]
  • Coromandel-Colville Reserves: Management Plan
    Coromandel-Colville Reserves: Management Plan September 2018 Purpose of this plan The Reserves Act 1977 requires that Thames-Coromandel District Council (the Council), as an administering body, prepare this management plan (Section 41). Reserves Act management plans are an important reserve management tool. These management plans are developed in consultation with reserve users, community and key stakeholder groups, with consideration to current management of a reserve. A management plan will provide for continuity between legislative requirements, council plans and policies, and the day-to-day operation of a reserve. This draft Coromandel Colville Reserves Management Plan applies to all reserves in the Coromandel Colville area administered by Thames-Coromandel District Council that are covered by the Reserves Act 1977. A management plan for the Coromandel Colville reserves was first prepared in 2005. This is the first review of the original plan. Process of preparing this reserve management plan, in accordance with the Reserves Act 1977: 14 March 2018 Council invites suggestions on reserve management objectives and policies Council approves draft Coromandel Colville Reserve Management Plan for 30 October 2018 public consultation Council calls for submissions on the draft Coromandel Colville Reserve 5 November 2018 Management Plan 18 January 2019 Submissions close February Hearings Public Consultation on this draft plan Public consultation on this plan will be undertaken from 5 November 2018 to 18 January 2019. Submission Process If you wish to make a submission to this draft General Policies Reserve Management Plan, you can: Complete a submission form online at www.tcdc.govt.nz/Have-Your-Say Send us an email to [email protected] Or, if you would prefer send a written submission to - Reserve Management Plan Review, Thames-Coromandel District Council, Private Bag1001, Thames 3540.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to Te Rūnanga O Ngāi Tahu: Māori Educational Achievement in the Christchurch Health and Development Study
    Report to Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu: Māori Educational Achievement in the Christchurch Health and Development Study David M. Fergusson, Geraldine F.H. McLeod, Te Maire Tau, Angus H. Macfarlane Copyright © 2014 David M. Fergusson, Geraldine F.H. McLeod, Te Maire Tau, Angus H. Macfarlane The moral rights of the authors have been asserted. ISBN 978-0-473-27220-3 A catalogue record for this book is available from the National Library of New Zealand (Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa). This book is copyright. Except for the purpose of fair review, no part may be stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including recording or storage in any information retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The opinions expressed and conclusions drawn in this Working Paper are solely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Ngāi Tahu Research Centre, University of Canterbury. For further information or additional copies of the Working Paper, please contact the publisher. Ngāi Tahu Research Centre University of Canterbury Private Bag 4800 Christchurch 8140 New Zealand Email: [email protected] www.ntrc.canterbury.ac.nz Cover: Background image – from Tom Green’s notebook (c. 1860s, Christchurch, University of Canterbury, Macmillan Brown Library, Ngāi Tahu Archives, M 22.) Report to Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu: Māori Educational Achievement in the Christchurch Health and Development Study AUTHORS David M. Fergusson Christchurch Health and Development Study at the University of Otago, Christchurch Geraldine F.H. McLeod Christchurch Health and Development Study at the University of Otago, Christchurch Te Maire Tau Ngāi Tahu Research Centre, University of Canterbury, Christchurch Angus H.
    [Show full text]
  • NGĀTI HEI and the CROWN AGREEMENT in PRINCIPLE EQUIVALENT July 2011
    NGĀTI HEI and THE CROWN AGREEMENT IN PRINCIPLE EQUIVALENT July 2011 INTRODUCTION - SETTLEMENT STRUCTURE 1. The Iwi of Hauraki1 entered into a Framework Agreement between the Hauraki Collective and the Crown dated 1 October 2010. 2. The Framework Agreement and Agreement in Principle Equivalents represent incremental steps towards a comprehensive Deed of Settlement between the Crown and the Iwi of Hauraki. 3. The Deed of Settlement will settle all Historical Claims2 under the Te Tiriti o Waitangi / the Treaty of Waitangi3 in the Hauraki region which arise from the whakapapa of each of the Iwi of Hauraki. 4. As a consequence of the Deed of Settlement, each of the Iwi of Hauraki will be entitled to a range of Treaty settlement redress. 5. The Crown and the Iwi of Hauraki acknowledge that the ultimate structure of a settlement with the Iwi of Hauraki is yet to be agreed, and will be developed in the course of negotiations. Thus, for example, it is not yet agreed whether there will be multiple deeds of settlement or a single deed of settlement with iwi specific redress.4 6. This Agreement in Principle Equivalent comprises both collective and iwi specific chapters and includes: a. redress agreed to by the Crown; b. redress the Crown is willing to explore; and c. redress the Hauraki Collective and Ngāti Hei seek. 7. The Crown acknowledges that the Collective and Ngāti Hei has the right to seek redress, but notes that some of the redress iwi seek is outside current government policy. 8. Ngāti Hei is party to the Hauraki Collective Framework Agreement and is undertaking iwi specific negotiations in respect of its interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Smartgrowth Maori and Tangata Whenua Iwi Demographics 2015
    Report SmartGrowth Maori and Tangata Whenua Iwi Demographics 2015 Prepared for SmartGrowth Prepared by Beca Ltd 6 August 2015 SmartGrowth Maori and Tangata Whenua Iwi Demographics 2015 Revision History Revision Nº Prepared By Description Date 1 Genevieve Doube 1st Draft 2 Shad Rolleston 2nd Draft 5 August 2015 3 4 5 Document Acceptance Action Name Signed Date Prepared by Genevieve Doube Reviewed by Shad Rolleston Approved by Christine Ralph on behalf of Beca Ltd © Beca 2015 (unless Beca has expressly agreed otherwise with the Client in writing). This report has been prepared by Beca on the specific instructions of our Client. It is solely for our Client’s use for the purpose for which it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. Any use or reliance by any person contrary to the above, to which Beca has not given its prior written consent, is at that person's own risk. i SmartGrowth Maori and Tangata Whenua Iwi Demographics 2015 Executive Summary This report has been prepared by Beca Ltd on behalf of SmartGrowth BOP to give effect to action 11C.1 Māori Demographics from the SmartGrowth Strategy 2013. Action 11C.1 states: Prepare a report from 2013 census data (and document methodology used) that relates to tangata whenua iwi and Māori in the areas of housing, employment, education and income (among others) for the purpose of developing a base platform from which to compare future demographics trends and community needs. This report provides a demographic snapshot about Māori and tangata whenua iwi1 in the SmartGrowth Sub-Region based on Census 2013 data.
    [Show full text]
  • Whakapapa for 'Tamaki Te Waiti'
    ~ 1 ~ WHAKAPAPA FOR ‘TAMAKI TE WAITI’ ‘HONE WAITI HIKITANGA’ BORN ABOUT 1820: ‘HIRA TE AWA’ BORN ABOUT 1800 GENERATION 1/. : GREAT-GREAT GRANDFATHERS FOR TAMAKI WAITI Birth Dates are estimates… Generation 1/. About: 1800: Hira Te Awa: 1800 - 1867 and others…Te Kou Hepana, Paratene te Taurua, Pakiripi. Maungakahia. Generation 1/. About 1820: Hone Waiti emerged into the Otamatea district about 1840; Hapu Uri o hau. Iwi Ngati Whatua. 2/. About: 1840: Hui (Huihana) Waiti married Whakaeke Te Awa: Otamatea to Maungakahia. 3/. About: 1870: Karipa Waiti: Hapu Ngati Whaeke? (Whakaeke after his mother) Maungakahia: Hapu south of Kaikohe Iwi Ngapuhi. Marae: Te Kotahitanga Karipa married=Katarina Snowden (Ngapuhi): Ahikiwi. 4/. About: 1915: Waru Te Waiti: Kaihu Valley 5/. About: 1939: Tamaki Te Waiti: Kaihu Valley. 1895: ALL SUCCESSORS OF HONE WAITI WHO IS DECEASED: OTAMATEA. Family for Hone Waiti at Otamatea (Paparoa): Huihana Waiti: Matene Ruta Waiti: Te Rima Waiti: Hera Waiti: Hohia Waiti: Waata Waiti: Family for his brother at Helensville (Kaitara): Manuka Karaipu Waiti m: Ripeka Waiti f: Rehipeti Waiti f: Kehaia Waiti f. 1904: SUCCESSORS OF HIRA TE AWA FROM 1868: MAUNGAKAHIA Family for: Manuka Karaipu Waiti: 1900. Hui (Huihana) Waiti 1/. Manuka Waiti male Karipa Waiti 2/. Wiremu Waiti: male 1896 living in Kingi Hohua (Karipa Waiti is his nephew) Waima Hokianga: 2nd cousin for Karipa Te Hira Hohua = Te Awa Waiti. Pukeatua Te Awa 3/. Kereana Waiti: male. Tomuri Te Awa Trustee: Kohi Tatana Hemana at the Boar War. Whakaeke Te Awa and others… ~ 2 ~ HONE WAITI (REVEREND) (Great-great grandfather for Tamaki Waiti) Through marriage and the reclamation of land the family of ‘WAITI’ at Otamatea, Maungakahia and Kaihu became closely associated with ‘Ngapuhi’ to the extent that today they are “Ngapuhi”.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Practice
    Summary of Practice Professional Learning and Development Accreditation Personal Profile First name and Surname Rewa Paewai Your iwi Rangitāne o Tamaki nui a Rua; Te Arawa; Ngāti Kahungunu Personal statement Rewa is currently employed with Te Puna Wānanga, the Faculty of Education, University of Auckland both as a Project Director for te reo Māori PLD and as a facilitator delivering te reo Māori PLD to primary and secondary schools. Rewa has expertise in: planning and implementing quality te reo Māori programmes (Y1-13), second language acquisition, assessment, NCEA and culturally responsive pedagogy. In the time that Rewa has been involved in trM PLD, she has seen a favourable shift in attitude toward te reo Māori. This, therefore is an opportune time to explore the possibilities for developing te reo Māori pathways from primary to secondary, in order to better prepare students to succeed in te reo Māori NCEA. Rewa is available to deliver PLD in Auckland, Waikato and the Bay of Plenty. Professional Learning and Development Overview Rewa began her career as a teacher of te reo Māori and mathematics (Secondary). Rewa was seconded as a facilitator for: te reo Māori NCEA providing PLD to HoD Māori, assessment and programme planning/course writing; Te Kotahitanga, providing in-depth PLD to teachers about culturally responsive pedagogy for improving Māori learner achievement. In this role Rewa was trained in the effective teacher profile, in-class observations, providing feedback and feed forward, shadow coaching, co-construction hui and data collection; and, AtoL (Assessment to Learn). Rewa was then appointed as the National Coordinator for te reo Māori to: build the PLD capability of reo Māori facilitators to improve the teaching and learning of reo Māori students in Y7-8 English-medium settings; assist in writing Te Aho Arataki Marau mō te Ako i Te Reo Māori (the Curriculum Guidelines for Teaching Māori language, Years 1-13), and the development of te reo Māori teaching resources.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Maunga Photos – Rob Tucker CONTENTS
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Maunga photos – Rob Tucker CONTENTS Chairs and CEO Report 6 Financials Organisational Structure 7 Independent Auditor’s Report 26 Strategic Plan 8 Trust Directory 28 Strategic Objectives 9 Statement of Comprehensive Revenue and Expenses 29 A Year in Review 10 Statement of Changes in Trust Capital 30 Annual Plan Highlights 12 Statement of Financial Position 31 Te Atiawa Iwi Holdings Limited Partnership 21 Statement of Cash Flows 32 Notes to the Financial Statements 33 51 Minutes of the Inaugural Annual General Meeting TE KOTAHITANGA O TE ATIAWA TRUST ANNUAL REPORT 2017 3 TE KOTAHITANGA O TE ATIAWA TRUST DEED SCHEDULE 6 REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNUAL REPORT 1. An Annual Report prepared in accordance with clause 10.1 (Preparation of annual report) shall be made available not less than 20 Working Days before an Annual General Meeting and shall contain, in respect of that Financial Year, the following information: a. A comparison of the Trust’s performance against the annual plan; b. A balance sheet and income and expenditure statements and notes so as to give a true and fair view of the financial affairs of the Trust and the Te Atiawa Group for that Financial Year. The financial statements shall include as a separate item: I. Details of any remuneration or fees paid to any Trustee or any Trustee’s firm and details of any premiums paid in respect of Trustees’ indemnity insurance; II. Changes in the value of the Trust Fund; III. Profit distribution; c. The steps taken by the Trust to increase the number of registered Members; d.
    [Show full text]
  • Ori Ministry, New Zealand
    Maori Pa’a Photo courtesy of Barry Oliver. M?ori Ministry, New Zealand JACOB (JAKE) ORMSBY Jacob (Jake) Ormsby, M.A. in Theology, MMin (Avondale College of Higher Education, Cooranbong, New South Wales, Australia). A New Zealander by birth Pastor Jake has served the church as a pastor, hospital and school chaplain, primary school principal, and teacher throughout Aotearoa/New Zealand. He has authored several magazine and journal articles. He is married to Evelyn with two adult children and three grandchildren. He enjoys outdoor recreation, music-especially his wife's piano playing, being a grandad, and travelling abroad. When the first Seventh-day Adventist missionaries arrived in Aotearoa, New Zealand, in 1885, the M?ori population of around 60,000 people was in decline due to the introduction of European diseases.1 The M?ori were already nominally Christianized due to the efforts of several notable early missionaries from other Christian denominations including Reverend Samuel Marsden on behalf of the Anglican Church Missionary Society (CMS) in 1814;2 Samuel Leigh on behalf of the Wesleyan (Methodist) and Henry Williams on behalf of the CMS both in 1823; and Roman Catholic Bishop Jean Baptiste Francois Pompallier in 1838 (although it has been suggested that there were M?ori Roman Catholics present before his arrival due to the influence of Catholic seamen, traders, and settlers).3 The Presbyterians arrived in 1848 as settlers, not missionaries, from Scotland, Ireland, and Australia along with Octavius Hadfield of the CMS.4 Mormons William Cooke and Thomas Holden, under the direction of mission president Augustus Farnham, followed in October 1854.
    [Show full text]