DOCSLIB.ORG

Reverse Dictionary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reverse Dictionary DOI 10.4010/2016.639 ISSN 2321 3361 © 2016 IJESC Research Article Volume 6 Issue No. 3 Reverse Dictionary Veena Gurram1, Sweta Rathod 2, Anish Lushte3, Pranay Vaidya4, Vinod Alone5, Mahendra Pawar 6 UG Scholar1,2,3,4, Assistant Professor5,6 Department Of Computer Engineering PVPPCOE Sion, Mumbai, India. Abstract: In this paper, we describe the design and implementation of a reverse dictionary. Unlike a traditional forward dictionary, which maps from words to their definitions, a reverse dictionary takes a user input phrase describing the desired concept, and returns a set of candidate words that satisfy the input phrase. This work has significant application not only for the general public, particu- larly those who work closely with words, but also in the general field of conceptual search. Index Terms: Dictionaries, thesauruses, search process, web-based services. I. INTRODUCTION III. LITERATURE SURVEY In this paper, we report work on creating an online reverse Literature survey is highlighted in reference to the dictionary (RD). As opposed to a regular (forward) dictionary performance and approach of the current system. that maps words to their definitions, a RD performs the con- Existing System: After referring existing system we came to a verse mapping, i.e., given a phrase describing the desired con- conclusion that they lack the following qualities:- cept, it provides words whose definitions match the entered • The existing dictionary outputs 100 results and most of them definition phrase. For example, suppose a forward dictionary are not related to the phrase. informs the user that the meaning of the word “spelunking” is • In the existing system ranking of result is not efficient. “exploring caves.” A reverse dictionary, on the other hand, ([16]T.Dao and T.Simpson [6]Z Wu and offers the user an opportunity to enter the phrase “check out M.Palmer).Therefore accurate result for a given phrase is not natural caves” as input, and expect to receive the word guaranteed. “spelunking” (and possibly other words with similar mean- • Auto-correction of input phrase is not done in the existing ings) as output. systems for example if user does some spelling mistake Effectively, the RD addresses the “word is on the tip of my while entering the input phrase, thus it will end up in giving tongue, but I can’t quite remember it” problem. A particular wrong results. category of people afflicted heavily by this problem are writ- ers, including students, professional writers, scientists, market- IV. PROPOSED SYSTEM ing and advertisement professionals, teachers, the list goes on. In a reverse dictionary the user enters the desired phrase with a In fact, for most people with a certain level of education, the logic and gets a certain number of words as the output.To do problem is often not lacking knowledge of the meaning of a so, we have to first build the RMS (Reverse Mapping Set). word, but, rather, being unable to recall the appropriate word Building an RMS means to find a set of words in whose defi- on demand. The RD addresses this widespread problem. nitions any word ‘w’ is found. Example: The word “sleep” is found in 4 definitions belonging to 4 words. Therefore II. RELATED WORK R(sleep) will be “slumber”, “sopor”, “nap”, ”rest”. These In a reverse dictionary a user input phrase is given and we words must be manually entered for each word. The RMS of receive certain number of words as output ranked with an the words can be found from the wordnet [2][6] dictionary.The algorithm. The related works to this reverse dictionary are the stop words like “whereas, whenever, however, very” etc needs reverse dictionaries [3][4] which is built with certain to be negated as they don’t form a very important part of drawbacks. The existing dictionary receives an input phrase theprocess. Whereas, Antonyms are needed to be addressed. and outputs many output words; therefore it can be tedious for Example: When the word sleep is followed by “cannot”, the the user to search one from it. Whereas, building a ranking antonym of “sleep”, which is “wake up” should be considered based dictionary, allows the user to choose from a set of words for the search process. The search can be enhanced by consid- which are closely related to each other. Example: In the ering the synonyms, hypernyms and hyponyms of that particu- existing reverse dictionary, the user inputs a phrase “unknown lar word. When the words do not yield enough output. The name” outputs over a 100 search results including synonym, hypernym and hyponym of that particular word is “anonymous”, “nameless”, “incognito”, “jane doe”, “john considered and the RMS of those words also form a part of the doe”, “some”, “sky-blue pink”, “dark horse” etc. [4], But the output words. A synonym is the other possible meaning of the most accurate result for “unknown name” shall be word, where as a hypernym is the common class under which “anonymous”, “nameless” but “incognito” also contributes the word occurs. Example: The word “parrot” belongs to some primary meaning to the user input phrase. Whereas “birds”, therefore the hypernym of “parrot” is birds. Whereas words like “sky-blue pink”, “challenge”, “key” doesn’t have the hyponym is the other similar birds like “macaw” etc. Con- anything to do with the concept but It is associated with the sidering synonyms, hypernyms and hyponyms will increase word “unknown”. Reverse mapping Set, RMS of t, denoted by the number of output words. i.e, if “parrot” doesn’t yield R(t) is mapped to the “definition” in the dictionary .Every enough results; the synonym, hyponym and hypernym of par- word that contains the definition, forms the suggested output. rot will yield more results. Finally, they are arranged according to the rank. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, March 2016 2727 http://ijesc.org/ The final step is to sort out the results. This is done when there • Remaining important words are stemmed, or converted to are more number of output words. Example: In the existing their base form. Eg: “describing” becomes “describe”. reverse dictionary, the user inputs a phrase “discrimination based on colour” outputs over a 100 search results including “racism”, “classism”, “judgemental”, “colour bar”, “colour line”, “red”, “nepotism”, “fair” etc. But the most accurate re- sult for “discrimination based on colour” shall be “racism”, but “colour line”, “colour bar” also contributes some primary meaning to the user input phrase. Whereas words like “fair”, “red” doesn’t have anything to do with the concept but It is associated with the word “colour” [3]. In order to avoid such • Fig : Working unnecessary results we decrease the number of search words.By decreasing the number of outputs, we finally get the • Words/Phrases containing negation are converted to their number of words which are closely associated with the search antonyms. Eg: “not pleasant” becomes “unpleasant”. concept. Therefore, according to the previous example, when a • Tokens will be generated and query will be formed using user enters a phrase “discrimination based on colour”, the out- this tokens. put shall be “racism”, “prejudice”, “colour line”, “colour bar”, • Expand query if results are less results are found on basis of “nepotism” etc.Inorder to avoid too many words, the words are synonym, hypernym and hyponym. grouped together with other words , and the set of two words • Sort result on basis of word-net hierarchy by comparing term are found in the definition of a word [1]. Example: “discrimi- similarity and term importance in a phrase. nation based on colour”, the word “racism” consists of both • Display Result. “discrimination” and “colour”, therefore it must be given more priority. V. Module Description Algorithms: Advantages: • K-Means Algorithm: K-means clustering tends to find clus- 1. Time efficiency:-Quick output. ters of comparable spatial extent, while the expectation- 2. Accuracy:- Gives accurate word. maximization mechanism allows clusters to have different 3. Auto Correction:- The phrase entered by the user is cor- shapes. It is used for creating multiple data sets. rected if the spelling is wrong. • Algorithm Build RMS: RMS stands for Reverse Mapping System Architecture: Set. It is a mapping algorithm designed to map the word to words of similar meaning. It improves the quality of word mapped i.e not vulnerable to the input phrase. For an input dictionary D a mapping R is created for all term appearing in the sense phrase. The RMS algorithm describe this reverse mapping pattern. • Algorithm GenerateQuery: Here we generate a query for all the SetType that are mean to be used for mapping and re- trieval of reversed term for the given input phrase. Here Query Q is generated for all other algorithm that are returned to get the meaning for the given set of terms in the phrase. The is the building algorithm for the SetType and Sorted queries. • Algorithm ExecuteQuery: For a given query Q if u have phrase that contain terms t1, t2, t3, ......tk, it performs AND/OR operations in query. If it performs OR operation Fig: System Architecture then the terms of the phrase are union with reverse term and if it performs AND operation then the term of the phrase in- The Reverse dictionary is a computer application which takes tersect with the reverse term and we returned the union or in- the user input phrase and gives the corresponding words as tersection of the reverse term. output.he RMS contains a set of mappings, the dictionary definitions and parse trees [8] for definitions. The database of • Algorithm ExpandAntonyms: Given: A query Q of the form synonyms which consists of the set of synonym for individual t1, t2, t3, ......tk, it creates a copy of the query and perform words in the user input phrase.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phonotactic Complexity of Finnish Nouns FRED KARLSSON
    7 Phonotactic Complexity of Finnish Nouns FRED KARLSSON 7.1 Introduction In the continuous list of publications on his homepage, Kimmo Koskenniemi gives an item from 1979 as the first one. But this is not strictly speaking his first publication. Here I shall elevate from international oblivion a report of Kimmo’s from 1978 from which the following introductory prophecy is taken: “The computer might be an extremely useful tool for linguistic re- search. It is fast and precise and capable of treating even large materials” (Koskenniemi 1978: 5). This published report is actually a printed version of Kimmo’s Master’s Thesis in general linguistics where he theoretically analyzed the possibili- ties of automatic lemmatization of Finnish texts, including a formalization of Finnish inflectional morphology. On the final pages of the report he esti- mates that the production rules he formulated may be formalized as analytic algorithms in several ways, that the machine lexicon might consist of some 200,000 (more or less truncated) stems, that there are some 4,000 inflectional elements, that all of these stems and elements can be accommodated on one magnetic tape or in direct-access memory, and that real-time computation could be ‘very reasonable’ (varsin kohtuullista) if the data were well orga- nized and a reasonably big computer were available (ibid.: 52-53). I obviously am the happy owner of a bibliographical rarity because Kimmo’s dedication of 1979 tells me that this is the next to the last copy. This was five years before two-level morphology was launched in 1983 when Kimmo substantiated his 1978 exploratory work by presenting a full- blown theory of computational morphology and entered the international computational-linguistic scene where he has been a main character ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reverse Dictionary of Cypriot Greek
    Cypriot Greek Lexicography: A Reverse Dictionary of Cypriot Greek Charalambos Themistocleous, Marianna Katsoyannou, Spyros Armosti & Kyriaki Christodoulou Keywords: reverse dictionary, Cypriot Greek, orthographic variation, orthography standardisation, dialectal lexicography. Abstract This article explores the theoretical issues of producing a dialectal reverse dictionary of Cypriot Greek, the collection of data, the principles for selecting the lemmas among various candidates of word types, their orthographic representation, and the choices that were made for writing a variety without a standardized orthography. 1. Introduction Cypriot Greek (henceforth CG) is a variety of Greek spoken by almost a million people in the Republic of Cyprus. CG differs from Standard Modern Greek (henceforth SMG) with regard to its phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, and even pragmatics (Goutsos and Karyolemou 2004; Papapavlou and Pavlou 1998; Papapavlou 2005; Tsiplakou 2004; Katsoyannou et al. 2006; Tsiplakou 2007; Arvaniti 2002; Terkourafi 2003). The study of the vocabulary of CG was one of the research goals of ‘Syntychies’, a research project for the production of lexicographic resources undertaken by the Department of Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies of the University of Cyprus between 2006 and 2010. Another research goal of the project has been the study of the written representation of the dialect—since there exists no standardized CG orthography. The applied part of the Syntychies project includes the creation of a lexicographic database suitable for the production of dialectal dictionaries of CG, such as a reverse dictionary of CG (henceforth RDCG), which is currently under publication. The lexicographic database is hosted in a dedicated webpage, which allows online searching of the database.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Dictionary
    Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR) Vol-2, Issue-4, 2016 ISSN: 2454-1362, http://www.onlinejournal.in Reverse Dictionary Veena Gurram1, Sweta Rathod2, Anish Lushte3, Pranay Vaidya4, Prof. Vinod Alone5 & Prof. Mahendra Pawar6 1,2,3,4B.E Student 5,6Assistant Professor 1,2,3,4,5,6Department Of Computer Engineering, PVPPCOE Sion, Mumbai 400022 Abstract— In this paper, we describe the design and dictionary are the reverse dictionaries [3][4] which is implementation of a reverse dictionary. Unlike a tra- built with certain drawbacks. The existing dictionary ditional forward dictionary, which maps from words receives an input phrase and outputs many output to their definitions, a reverse dictionary takes a user words; therefore it can be tedious for the user to input phrase describing the desired concept, and re- search one from it. Whereas, building a ranking based turns a set of candidate words that satisfy the input dictionary, allows the user to choose from a set of phrase. This work has significant application not only words which are closely related to each other. for the general public, particularly those who work Example: In the existing reverse dictionary, the user closely with words, but also in the general field of inputs a phrase “unknown name” outputs over a 100 conceptual search. search results including “anonymous”, “nameless”, “incognito”, “jane doe”, “john doe”, “some”, “sky- Index Terms—Dictionaries, thesauruses, search pro- blue pink”, “dark horse” etc. [4], But the most cess, web-based services. accurate result for “unknown name” shall be “anonymous”, “nameless” but “incognito” also I. INTRODUCTION contributes some primary meaning to the user input phrase.
    [Show full text]
  • Using an On-Line Dictionary to Find Rhyming Words And
    USING AN ON=LINE DICTIONARY TO FIND RHYMING WORDS AND PRONUNCIATIONS FOR UNKNOWN WORDS Roy J Byrd I.B.M. Thomas J. Watson Research Center Yorktown Heights, New York 10598 Martin S. Chodorow Department of Psychology, Hunter College of CUNY and I.B.M. Thomas J. Watson Research Center Yorktown Heights, New York 10598 ABSTRACT word not found in the dictionary. WordSmith also shows the user words that are "close" to a given word Humans know a great deal about relationships among along dimensions such as spelling (as in published dic- words. This paper discusses relationships among word tionaries), meaning (as in thesauruses), and sound (as in pronunciations. We describe a computer system which rhyming dictionaries). models human judgement of rhyme by assigning specific roles to the location of primary stress, the similarity of Figure I shows a sample of the WordSmith user inter- phonetic segments, and other factors. By using the face. The current word, urgency, labels the text box at model as an experimental tool, we expect to improve our the center of the screen. The box contains the output understanding of rhyme. A related computer model will of the PRONUNC application applied to the current attempt to generate pronunciations for unknown words word: it shows the pronunciation of urgency and the by analogy with those for known words. The analogical mapping between the word's spelling and pronunciation. processes involve techniques for segmenting and PRONUNC represents pronunciations in an alphabet matching word spellings, and for mapping spelling to derived from Webster's Seventh Collegiate Dictionary. In sound in known words.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing a Reverse Dictionary, Based on Word Definitions, Using A
    Implementing a Reverse Dictionary, based on word definitions, using a Node-Graph Architecture Sushrut Thorat Varad Choudhari Center for Mind/Brain Sciences Department of Computer Science University of Trento Rajarambapu Institute of Technology Rovereto, TN 38068, Italy Islampur, MH 415414, India [email protected] [email protected] Abstract In this paper, we outline an approach to build graph-based reverse dictionaries using word defi- nitions. A reverse dictionary takes a phrase as an input and outputs a list of words semantically similar to that phrase. It is a solution to the Tip-of-the-Tongue problem. We use a distance-based similarity measure, computed on a graph, to assess the similarity between a word and the input phrase. We compare the performance of our approach with the Onelook Reverse Dictionary and a distributional semantics method based on word2vec, and show that our approach is much better than the distributional semantics method, and as good as Onelook, on a 3k lexicon. This simple approach sets a new performance baseline for reverse dictionaries.1 1 Introduction A forward dictionary (FD) maps words to their definitions. A reverse dictionary (RD) (Sierra, 2000), also known as an inverse dictionary, or search-by-concept dictionary (Calvo et al., 2016), maps phrases to single words that approximate the meaning of those phrases. In the Oxford Learner’s Dictionary2, one definition of ‘brother’ is ‘a boy or man who has the same mother and father as another person’. A reverse dictionary will map not only this phrase to ‘brother’, but also phrases such as ‘son of my parents’.
    [Show full text]
  • Find the Right Words with Thesauruses Ebook, Epub
    FIND THE RIGHT WORDS WITH THESAURUSES PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kara Fribley | 24 pages | 01 Jan 2012 | Cherry Lake Publishing | 9781610803694 | English | Ann Arbor, United States Find the Right Words with Thesauruses PDF Book How is the word barren an attack on women? Login or Register. This essential guide for writers provides real-life example sentences and a careful selection of the most relevant synonyms, as well as new usage notes, hints for choosing between similar words, a Word Finder section organized by subject, and a comprehensive language guide. An easy to access list of synonyms can greatly influence any writing assignment a student has. Stay a step ahead with Microsoft For some types of searches only the first result or the first few results are likely to be useful. Check your dictionary… help you extend your vocabulary. Words formed from any letters in thesauruses , plus an optional blank or existing letter All words formed from thesauruses by changing one letter Browse words starting with thesauruses by next letter. Thy shalt If you get back nothing but junk, try restating your query so that it's just two or three simple words. You can also train yourself to self-edit by watching out for words you know you over-rely on. It is a great tool to use for building a vocabulary, however, it should be handled with care when used for writing purposes as it can have the adverse effect. In Excel , on the Review tab, click Thesaurus. At the bottom of the Thesaurus task pane, select a language from the drop- down list.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Building a Reverse Dictionary
    Jincy A K et al, / (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 5 (6) , 2014, 7727-7728 A Survey of Building a Reverse Dictionary Jincy A K, Sindhu L Department of Computer Science& Engg,College Of Engineering, Cochin university of science and Technology, Poonjar,Kottayam,kerala,India Abstract- A reverse dictionary takes as input a phrase or II. GENERAL TECHNIQUE a sentence describing a concept, and returns a set of The different steps for the implementation of reverse candidate words that satisfy the meaning of the input dictionary includes lexical analysis, elimination of stop phrase. This paper presents a literature survey words, stemming, pos tagging, concept mapping, building regarding the design and implementation of a reverse the reverse mapping set, querying the reverse mapping set, dictionary. The reverse dictionary identifies a ranking candidate words, term similarity... concept/idea/definition to words and phrases used to describe that concept. It has significant application for A. Stemming those who work closely with words and also in the Stemming is the process of finding the root word of a general field of conceptual search. Mainly for linguists, word contained in a given phrase. Normally stemming is poets, anthropologists and forensics specialist accomplished by means of porter stemmer but studies examining a damaged text that had only the final proved that it has certain drawbacks portion of a particular word preserved. B. POS Tagging Part-Of-Speech Tagging is the process of assigning parts Keywords- Thesaurus, Stemming, Pos Tagging, Concept of speech to each word (and other token), such as noun, Mining verb, adjective, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Reversing a One-Way Bilingual Dictionary
    Leonard NEWMARK, University of California, San Diego Reversing a One-Way Bilingual Dictionary Abstract In 1996, I completed a 10-year project to compile an Albanian-English dictionary of some 75,000 entries and sub-entries. With that project completed, I decided to prepare a companion English-Albanian dictionary, but I did not want to devote another 10 years to that compilation. Instead, I wanted to see how far purely computa­ tional techniques would go in converting my dictionary into its derived reverse. This paper is a report on the degree to which the attempt succeeded and the degree to which human intervention was required. Examples are provided to illustrate some rather surprising results, and a general conclusion is drawn for bilingual lexicography. For the past year I have been trying to convert a computerized bilingual dictionary automati­ cally into another dictionary in the reverse direction: specifically my Albanian-English dictionary, designed for readers whose access language is English, into an English-Albanian dictionary for writers. My source dictionary, published in March 1998 by the Oxford University Press as Oxford Albanian-English Dictionary,1 has some 75,000 entries and sub- entries, more than any other dictionary of Albanian, bilingual or monolingual. It boasts a number of features that distinguish it from many other bilingual dictionaries: 1) inclusion of large numbers of non-standard items (indicated by the symbol •) as well as all attested standard stems; 2) marking of morpheme boundaries in Albanian words; 3)
    [Show full text]
  • Word Parts Dictionary: Standard and Reverse Listings of Prefixes
    www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com Word Parts Dictionary www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com Word Parts Dictionary Standard and Reverse Listings of Prefixes, Suffixes, Roots and Combining Forms by MICHAEL J. SHEEHAN www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Jefferson, North Carolina, and London Librarwww.IELTS4U.blogfa.comy of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Sheehan, Michael, 1939- Word parts dictionary : standard and reverse listings of prefixes, suffixes, and combining forms / by Michael Sheehan. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 0-7864-0819-7 (library binding : 50# alkaline paper) @ 1. English language — Suffixes and prefixes — Dictionaries. 2. English language — Word formation — Dictionaries. 3. English language — Reverse dictionaries. I. Title. PE1175.S45 2000 423M—dc21 00-37217 British Library cataloguing data are available ©2000 Michael J. Sheehan. All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Manufactured in the United States of America McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Box 611, Jefferson, North Carolina 28640 www. mcfarlandpub. com To Dona Sheehan, salubrious wife and gift www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com Table of Contents Preface 1 PARTI Dictionary 3 PART II Finder (Reverse Dictionary) 97 PART III www.IELTS4U.blogfa.comCategories 181 ANIMALS 182 THE BODY 187 COLORS 193 DIMENSIONS 196 DIRECTIONS 197 DIVINATION 197 THE ENVIRONMENT 200 FEAR OR DISLIKE OF ... 205 FOOD 214 LOCATION 216 NEGATIVES 217 NUMBERS 218 THE SENSES 220 SHAPES 222 TIME 226 Vll www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com Preface This dictionary is based on word parts — those prefixes, suffixes, com¬ bining forms and roots which show up repeatedly to form words — and is meant to be used in conjunction with a standard dictionary and a thesaurus.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to Represent Bilingual Dictionaries
    Learning to Represent Bilingual Dictionaries Muhao Chen1∗, Yingtao Tian2∗, Haochen Chen2, Kai-Wei Chang1, Steven Skiena2 & Carlo Zaniolo1 1University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 2The State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, USA [email protected]; fkwchang, [email protected]; fyittian, haocchen, [email protected] Abstract mantic transfers, these approaches critically sup- port many cross-lingual NLP tasks including neu- Bilingual word embeddings have been widely ral machine translations (NMT) (Devlin et al., used to capture the correspondence of lexi- 2014), bilingual document classification (Zhou cal semantics in different human languages. However, the cross-lingual correspondence et al., 2016), knowledge alignment (Chen et al., between sentences and words is less studied, 2018b) and entity linking (Upadhyay et al., 2018). despite that this correspondence can signifi- While many existing approaches have been pro- cantly benefit many applications such as cross- posed to associate lexical semantics between lan- lingual semantic search and textual inference. guages (Chandar et al., 2014; Gouws et al., 2015; To bridge this gap, we propose a neural em- Luong et al., 2015a), modeling the correspon- bedding model that leverages bilingual dictio- dence between lexical and sentential semantics naries1. The proposed model is trained to map the lexical definitions to the cross-lingual tar- across different languages is still an unresolved get words, for which we explore with differ- challenge. We argue that learning to represent ent sentence encoding techniques. To enhance such cross-lingual and multi-granular correspon- the learning process on limited resources, our dence is well desired and natural for multiple rea- model adopts several critical learning strate- sons.
    [Show full text]
  • 'It Works in Practice but Will It Work in Theory?' the Uneasy Relationship Between Lexicography and Matters Theoretical
    ‘It works in practice but will it work in theory?’ The uneasy relationship between lexicography and matters theoretical1 Michael Rundell Keywords: lexicographical theory, function theory, metalexicography, prototype theory, regular polysemy, lexical functions, user-generated content, collaborative lexicography, adaptive hypermedia. Abstract This paper considers how the practical business of producing dictionaries may be informed by and facilitated by theoretical considerations. What kinds of theory have the potential to make dictionaries better? And is there such a thing as ‘theoretical lexicography’? Several theoretical paradigms are discussed. In the case of the metalexicographic contributions of L.V. Shcherba and H.E. Wiegand, it is suggested that their relevance to the practical task of dictionary-creation is limited; and it is argued that the so-called ‘theory of lexicographical functions’ proposed by Henning Bergenholtz and his colleagues, while helpfully focussing on users and uses, adds little that is new to the debate. Conversely, it is shown that linguistic theory has much to offer lexicographers, and the direct applicability of various linguistic theories is demonstrated in a number of case studies. Finally, the whole discussion regarding appropriate theoretical inputs for lexicography is brought into the radically changed digital world in which lexicography now finds itself. 1. Introduction: Zgusta’s dilemma. Back in 1985, Anna Wierzbicka observed that ‘Lexicography has no theoretical foundation, and even the best lexicographers, when pressed, can never explain what they are doing, and why’ (Wierzbicka 1985: 5). Is this still true? And if true, does it matter? It depends who you ask; this is a divisive issue. To simplify a little: we have, ranged on one side, a diverse group united by their fervent belief in the idea of ‘lexicographic theories’ which dictionary-makers ought to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • WPSSIN SCANDINAVIAN SYNTAX Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax Is an Electronic Publication for Current Articles Relating to the Study of Scandinavian Syntax
    Issue 100 June 2018 WORKING PAPERS WPSSIN SCANDINAVIAN SYNTAX Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax is an electronic publication for current articles relating to the study of Scandinavian syntax. The articles appearing herein are previously unpublished reports of ongoing research activities and may subsequently appear, revised or unrevised, in other publications. The WPSS homepage: http://project.sol.lu.se/grimm/working-papers-in-scandinavian-syntax/ The 101st volume of WPSS will be published in December 2018. Papers intended for publication should be submitted no later than November 15, 2018. June 2018, Johan Brandtler, editor Contact: Johan Brandtler Stockholm University Department of Swedish Language and Multilingualism 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden E-mail: [email protected] Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax ISSN: 1100-097x Editor: Johan Brandtler, Stockholm University Editorial Board: Valéria Molnár, Lund University Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson, Lund University WPSS 100 June 2018 Contents From impersonal to reflexive verb 1 Cecilia Falk Revisiting the etymology of the Norse negative enclitic -a/-at 20 Eric Lander Constraints on movement 41 Mayumi Hosono Elvis Presley, God and Jane: the Germanic proprial article in a 64 contrastive perspective Joachim Kokkelmans From impersonal to reflexive verb Cecilia Falk Stockholm University Abstract Old Swedish had impersonally construed verbs with an oblique subject(-like) Experiencer argu- ment. Most of them are personally construed verbs today, with nominative Experiencer. Whereas this change for most formerly impersonal verbs just showed up as a change from oblique to nomi- native, a small number of verbs showed an additional change: a reflexive pronoun became oblig- atory. In this paper I will discuss two possible analyses of this change.
    [Show full text]