DOCSLIB.ORG

Discourse Analysis Studies: the Contributions in Language Teaching

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Discourse Analysis Studies: the Contributions in Language Teaching Discourse Analysis Studies: The Contributions in Language Teaching Desi Yanti Sinurat English Departement Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Lancang Kuning University Abstract: This paper was created with the aim to focus the attention of the contributions of discourse analysis to language learning. Most researchers today are concerned with discourse analysis as an alternative way to distinguish the process of language cognition. In this discussion will arise how the functional characteristics of sentimental element that acts as a signal for the listener in different contexts to facilitate the integration of online information and discourse analysis is as a methodological tool used to adjust the functional inquiry of the speaker, as well as the process of development as we are discriminated by identifying responsible social attitudes and ideologies in observed linguistic patterns. Most teachers have a tendency to teach languages separately with their use. So that the resulting context is discussed is poorly understood and the time to practice the lesson has been less tangible, and in life situations, students fail to use language and find it difficult to recognize the function speech guided by the speaker. Keywords: Discourse analysis, pragmatics, speech acts, functions, context, syllabus, structuralism, methodology. 1. Introduction 1. The formal and functional The approaches to communicating or aspect of language. speaking can be shaped from multiple The particular languages can be directions. Language approaches exist both summarised macro linguistic as biological, linguistically and non-linguistically. But cultural, and sociological an in a narrow most people in the language are not sense of phonology, morphology, commensurate with the appropriate semantics, in other terms the grammatical wording. Therefore, in reality, it cannot be properties. The starting of a more scientific perfect for further understanding of the approach to language could be observed in language which is in accordance with the structural approach. Structural linguist structure of the grammar. For the structure tried to find out the grammatical properties of the language, we can find in the book of of language: in other words, the formal grammar, because the learning in the book aspect of language, sound, words, is very efficient and effective. So do not sentences are explored from many points waste time. The lesson in this book has of views and by thousands of people and become a very useful way. There are consequently those studies met at a single questions that are used to answer point. something that happened in nature. Sentences which gratuity utters in order to question or there are a billion types of Communicate, are formal contracts and questions. The essential issue to reclaim they are groups of related words in which here is that one has to ask the question grammar is the base. In fact, this common related a purpose.. anto Hamuddin (2012) thought and aim in language studies cannot points out, a linguistic functionalist is one be ignored, but there is always a need to go who tries to determine how speakers beyond these studies. In applied manage to reach their communicative ends linguistics, it is proved that grammar by means of a language and who is ready teaching does not make people speak and to classify and Hierarchies facts it any reflects the abstract side, so what is accordingly, even at the expense of formal beyond the from? Anticipate, it is ‘the identities. function’. The structural study of language helps us in understanding the functional approach. To begin with, grammatical function of The functional study of language means, language has to be studied, thus form and studying how language is used. For function have to be compared. Since instance, trying to find out what the grammar reflects the formal counterpart specific purpose that language serves for when someone says “book” and “The book us, and how the members of a language there”, may only be a very slight community achieve and react to these difference between the two. Whether one purposes through speaking, reading, says “book or the book, the responder writing and listening. About this, Simpson understands both, hence there is no need to says that “it is clear that the use of consider function in this perspective, but language is part of a communication what about the relationship between the channel that includes non-linguistic noun and the verb. For example “smile and behavior. Linguistic and non-linguistic baby”. When these two words are may be inseparable from the point of view organized in two different ways they of the speaker and the hearer: hand me reflect two separate meanings. One is over the pointing and the role of nudges, “baby smiles and the other “smiles baby”. winks facial expressions, the tone of voice, When these two constructions are used in and so on. In this respect, can easily be any context the meaning they convey to considered as an example. When a person the hearer is apparent. asks the question, the other response, but there are several ways of asking the same Examples : 1. The baby smiled to the achieved if the "smiling" and "baby" balloon examples can be replaced on triangles 2. Mother smiled to the baby nonsense except formalism. More than the From the first example above, where the relationship of the affected person. smiling perpetrator is the baby, while the Synthetically it is a 'subject-object' smiley effect is the balloons. Then from relationship, so love and smile can be the second example, the perpetrator of the easily applied to this triangle. Baby and smiling act is the mother and the baby who smile symbols, baby referrals: very young gets the effect of the smile. both concepts children, smiling sedans: happy are a sign of a secure signal within a impressions in the face. semantic consisting of a marker and which Thinking or reference: what listeners are then connected with associative understand when baby and smile is said. psychology bonds, known as the triangular There are some the question: semiotics of Ogden and Richards made in 1923. 1. If the words we apply to the triangle While the Palmer states that the view of way, then whether the results will be Ogden and Richards sees its relationship as achieved that we expect? a triangle, in which linguistic symbols and 2. What is the relationship between these elements of words, sentences, references elements? and others in the world of experience. 3. What is the purpose or purpose of the Whereas thought and reference is a words they convey to the hearer? concept, according to theory there is no direct connection between symbols and From the above questions, to oppose or references (between the language and the against the theory of Ogden and Richards references), the connection is through it is impossible to answer his questions thinking and referencing the concepts of quickly. Just in terms of semantics, just our thinking. searching for the answer "for what it means" in this semantic theory is the one But for the opinion of Ogden and used the meaning of the word words that Richards, the relationship of thought exists are spoken according to the purpose or in the minds of people, but in the opinion purpose of certain events. The meaning of of Ogden and Richards, it is not explained these words is the small sentence or or focused on how that meaning is context in which they are used. As an illustration of brown and Yule states: in recent years, the idea of linguistic strings comprehension is considered in a text, (a Sentence ) can be fully analyzed social, and psychological contexts, so regardless of 'context'. This question has meaningful and understandable to them been seriously questioned. If Grammar that it can be used. Brown and Yule state: wants to criticize delivery in Language. an appropriate discourse analysis of Whatever in the delivery of Language or language analysis is used, and therefore words in accordance with the term of language analysis is not limited to the actual Grammar. And what we do when unexplained linguistic form of purpose and asked "what is certain intention function that everyone's mind has acceptable?" and whether we are prepared accepted. to build some circumstances where the For Fairclough: There is a reciprocal sentence can be used properly. relationship between language and society. Language is part of society, the linguistic Sometimes in the delivery of a word or phenomenon is a social phenomenon of a phrase, there is a different delivery special kind and a social phenomenon is a according to the purpose or purpose of the linguistics phenomenon. Schiffrin speaker. As pointed out by Alberto, the expressed his opinion: a language main point about "function" that definition is the use of a language essentially separates them from all other consistent with its function in general. important units. Here the meaning of Discourse is seen as a system in which "function" the purpose of language usage, certain functions are realized which are of but this term cannot be equated with great concern. The definition of "usefulness" only. This should be functionalist discourse makes analysis considered in the context of learning in away from the structural basis of orderly discourse analysis. and needy focus. In contrast, in speech patterns, it is used for certain purposes in certain contexts and how the results of the capture and understanding have been 3. Formal and functional conveyed. Communicative-based paradigms in discourse. strategies tend to use various analytical To begin a discourse then we need to methods as well as quantitative methods define the term in the discourse that we derived from the social, scientific will pass on. For word processing: approach, and how to interpret the more discourse analysis examines how language humanist to replicates the purpose of the speaker itself.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis' [Review]
    ©Pragmatics and discourse analysis© [Review] Article (Accepted Version) Taylor, Charlotte (2016) 'Pragmatics and discourse analysis' [Review]. Year's Work in English Studies, 95 (1). pp. 169-178. ISSN 1471-6801 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/59463/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk 13. Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis The year 2014 proved to be an exciting one for pragmatics and discourse analysis as it was characterized by a series of cross-over initiatives, reaching out beyond the boundaries of the single fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation
    Dissertation A Microethnographic Discourse Analysis of the Conditions of Alienation, Engagement, Pleasure, and Jouissance from a Three-year Ethnographic Study of Middle School Language Arts Classrooms Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert Craig Heggestad II, M.Ed., B.A. Graduate Program in Education: Teaching & Learning The Ohio State University 2018 Dissertation Committee: Dr. David Bloome, Advisor Dr. Caroline Clark Dr. George Newell Dr. Amy Shuman Abstract This theoretical dissertation explores the constructs of alienation, engagement, pleasure, and jouissance as they relate to research and theory on and in classroom education, in particular in middle school language arts classrooms. The research questions ask: First, how is the construct of alienation conceptualized and made manifest in the classroom and how do these empirical findings of the condition of alienation refine the theoretical construct of alienation? Second, how is the construct of engagement conceptualized and made manifest in the classroom and how do these empirical findings of the condition of engagement refine the theoretical construct of engagement? Third, how is the construct of pleasure conceptualized and made manifest in the classroom and how do these empirical findings of the condition of pleasure refine the theoretical construct of pleasure? And fourth, how is the construct of jouissance conceptualized and made manifest in the classroom and how do these empirical findings of the condition of jouissance refine the theoretical construct of jouissance? The research questions are answered through four case studies. The dissertation takes an ethnographic perspective towards research, utilizing qualitative and ethnographic methods of data collection and analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Discourse Analysis of News Discourse
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Academy Publication Online ISSN 1799-2591 Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 399-403, April 2018 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0804.06 Critical Discourse Analysis of News Discourse Qin Xie Shanxi Normal University, China Abstract—News discourse is one of main analysis subjects of critical discourse analysis. People can know the opinions implied by the author and grasp the real situation of the events described in the discourse by critical discourse analysis. Furthermore, it is beneficial for the audience to establish the critical awareness of News discourse and enhance the ability to critically analyze news discourse. Based on the discussion of the concept of news discourse and critical discourse analysis, the theoretical foundations and steps of critical discourse analysis, the paper illustrates the method of the critical analysis of news discourse. The author also puts forward issues that needed to pay attention to in order to improve the ability of news discourse analysis. Index Terms—news discourse, critical discourse analysis, method, emphases Critical discourse analysis can provide some guidance for the analysis of news discourse. Knowing the theoretical basis and analytical method of critical discourse analysis is beneficial to understand the actual situation of the events described in the news discourse and the implicit ideological content in news discourse. The paper explores the elements and the steps of the critical discourse analysis of news discourse. I. THE CONCEPT OF NEWS DISCOURSE AND CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS A. The Concept of News Discourse News discourse, a vital field of linguistic research, is always seen as an objective and formal linguistic form of discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice
    Perspectives on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice Perspectives on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice By Laura Alba-Juez Perspectives on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice, by Laura Alba-Juez This book first published 2009 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2009 by Laura Alba-Juez All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-0597-1, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-0597-1 For Gustavo, Joaquín and Julian TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .................................................................................... ix Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Chapter One................................................................................................. 5 Introducing Discourse Analysis Chapter Two.............................................................................................. 25 The Data Chapter Three............................................................................................ 45 Pragmatics Chapter Four.............................................................................................. 79 Interactional
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Discourse Analysis of Martin Luther King's Speech in Socio
    Advances in Language and Literary Studies Vol. 4 No. 1; January 2013 Copyright © Australian International Academic Centre, Australia Critical Discourse Analysis of Martin Luther King’s Speech in Socio-Political Perspective Muhammad Aslam Sipra Assistant Professor, Department of GRC (English), JCC, King Abdulaziz University, PO Box 80283, Jeddah 21589 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia E-mail: [email protected] Athar Rashid Assistant Professor, Faculty of English Language, Literature & Applied Linguistics, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan E-mail: [email protected] Doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.4n.1p.27 Received: 01/12/2012 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.4n.1p.27 Accepted: 04/01/2013 Abstract The article presents the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of the first part of King Martin Luther’s speech “When I Have a Dream” in socio-political context. The study investigates how it lies on the basis of application of Fairclough version of CDA in the first part of the text. Moreover, it explicates the terms like social, cultural and political inequalities in the light of text and framework. Keywords: CDA, Socio-political Perspective, 3D Model, Racial Discrimination, Hegemony, Dominance, Social inequalities 1. Introduction The term discourse has several definitions. In the study of language, discourse often refers to the speech patterns and usage of language, dialects, and acceptable statements, within a community. It is a subject of study of peoples who live in secluded areas and share similar speech conventions. Analysis is a process of evaluating the things by breaking them down into pieces. Discourse Analysis simply refers to the linguistic analysis of connected writing and speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Discourse Analysis: Mass Media
    Critical Discourse Analysis: Mass Media Deti Anitasari Department of English Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lancang Kuning [email protected] ABSTRACT: In this paper, the researcher aims are to review some key problems of approaches to research on mass media text from point of view discourse analytical and to present an argument, as well as a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) structures for analysis of mass media discourse. The researcher regards a number of areas of critical research interest in mass media discourse locally and elsewhere. An instance of actual CDA researches on mass media discourse is reviewed in terms of topics of obviously popular interest among society, before listing methodological, as well as the topical plan by a main support in the field for further work. This paper concludes that CDA’s multidisciplinary approach helps to understand and aware of the hidden socio-political issues and agenda in all kinds of areas of language as a social practice to empower the individual and social groups. Keywords: Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse studies, Mass Media Discourse, Media text Analysis INTRODUCTION human talks to one another via verbal and non-verbal means, but which Discourse has been explained as concerns messages that are essentially structures and practices that reflect transmitted through a medium (channel) human thought and social realities to reach a large number of people through particular collections of words (Wimmer & Dominick, 2012, Devito, and that simultaneously construct 2011). From the beginning, for a clear meaning in the world (Fairclough, 2003). point of view on the problems relating to Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) mass media effects, it is helpful to proposes a research methodology for clarify what constitutes mass media in deconstructing discourses and fixed current communication studies, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Elevator Pitch
    MONOGRÁFICO Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación ISSN: 1576-4737 https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/clac.66597 Rhetorical Analysis of a Discourse Model in the Business World: Elevator Pitch Javier de Santiago-Guervós1 Recibido: 14 de noviembre de 2019 / 24 de noviembre de 2019 Abstract. This paper proposes an analytical model for entrepreneurial pitches based on the five canons of rhetoric (i.e. invention, arrangement, style, memory and delivery), through the de- construction of the text from the discursive act itself (as conceived in the invention phase) to its actual production (i.e. delivery). The questions this methodology attempts to answer are why the pitch may be persuasive and how that persuasion is achieved by analyzing its discursive and linguistic characteristics; what ethical, rational or emotional arguments are appealed to; who the potential audience is, and what other multimodal resources are used to support the persuasive force of the text. In order to answer these questions, two pitches in Spanish are deconstructed and conclusions regarding their efficacy are drawn. Key words: Persuasion; rhetoric; discourse analysis. [es] Análisis retórico de un modelo de discurso en el ámbito comercial: Elevator Pitch Resumen. En este trabajo se propone un modelo analítico para un tipo de discurso comercial (Elevator Pitch) basado en los cinco cánones de la retórica clásica (inventio, dispositio, elocutio, memoria y actio). Partiendo de dos discursos opuestos desde el punto de vista de su eficacia, se pretende deconstruir el texto para comprender las razones del logro persuasivo (o de su fracaso) analizando sus características discursivas y lingüísticas desde el mismo momento de la planificación (estudio del destinatario, argumentos, etc.) hasta la puesta en escena pasando por una selección léxica (elocutio) perfectamente estudiada que pretende estimular marcos cognitivos de interpretación que apoyan la propia argumentación en favor de la persuasión del interlocutor.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics
    15 Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics SENKO MAYNARD One tends to simplistically think that the speaker is in the center of place, and the place passively receives the effect from the speaker. But this view is contrary to how the place of talk functions. The speaker is the one influenced by place; place is acting and the speaker is receiving. The place influences, and in fact defines, the speaker. Speaker does not merely speak “in” the place; the speaker is defined “by” the place. Mio 1948: 21, my translation 0 Introduction: Definition and Organization Discourse analysis is usually defined in two related ways. First, discourse analysis examines linguistic phenomena of real-life communication beyond the sentence level. Second, discourse analysis views functions of language as primary rather than its form. These two aspects are emphasized in two dif- ferent books (both bearing the title Discourse Analysis and published in 1983). Stubbs (1983: 1) aligns with the first position by saying that discourse analysis refers “mainly to the linguistic analysis of naturally occurring connected spoken or written discourse” and it “attempts to study the organization of language above the sentence or above the clause.” G. Brown and Yule (1983: 1) take the second position, stating that discourse analysis is “the analysis of language in use,” and “it cannot be restricted to the description of linguistic forms independent of the purposes or functions which those forms are designed to serve in human affairs.” Although discourse analysis is notoriously broadly defined, embedded in even the fluctuating definitions are the insistence on analysis of naturally occur- ring language and a desire to understand the functions of language.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology1
    Wodak-3795-Ch-01:Wodak-3795-Ch-01.QXP 9/29/2008 4:29 PM Page 1 1 Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology 1 Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer CDA – What is it all about? 1 A brief history of the ‘CDA Group’ 3 The common ground: discourse, critique, power and ideology 4 Main research agenda and challenges 11 Differences and similarities – beyond the social dimension 19 Methodology 23 Summary and criticism 32 CDA – What is it all about? In this chapter, we first provide a brief ‘story’ – how it all began; then we pre - sent an overview of some important research agendas in CDA and discuss new challenges for CDA research. Secondly, we discuss the various theoretical and methodological approaches assembled in this volume from a sociological and epistemological perspective. 2 There, we focus mostly on three central and con - stitutive concepts: power, ideology and critique. We also, of course, summarize some of the salient principles which are constitutive of all approaches in CDA. In addition, we mention some important criticism which CDA has been con - fronted with in the past years (see Billig, 2003, 2008; Chilton, 2007; Chilton and Wodak, 2007; Wodak and Cillia, 2006 for an extensive discussion of this issue). The terms Critical Linguistics (CL) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) are often used interchangeably. In fact, recently, the term CDA seems to have been preferred and is being used to denote the theory formerly identified as CL.Therefore, we will continue to use CDA exclusively here (see Anthonissen, 2001; Chilton and Wodak, 2007 for an extensive discussion of these terms and their history).
    [Show full text]
  • Can Dataviz Do in Popular Science Communication?
    What ‘Work’ Can Dataviz Do in Popular Science Communication? Martin Engebretsen a Department of Nordic and Media Studies, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, Kristiansand, Norway [email protected] Keywords: Data Visualization, Popular Science Communication, Social Semiotics, Discourse Analysis, Design Practices Abstract: Data visualizations have proliferated on public arenas for information and communication – in journalism, PR and governmental information as well as in popular science communication (PSC). In the existing literature on PSC, simplicity, relevance and trust are identified as critical factors for the communication to succeed. This position paper argue that data visualizations represent a semiotic resource with unique potentials regarding all of these criteria. The paper aims at presenting a theoretical and methodological framework for studying data visualizations applied in popular science discourses. The main goals are a) to introduce social semiotics as an advanced analytical tool for the scrutiny of data visualizations, b) to introduce PUS (Public understanding of science) as a field relevant for empirical studies of data visualization, and c) to present a method of analysis combining a small scale corpus analysis with multimodal close reading of selected visualizations. 1 INTRODUCTION During the latest decades, data visualizations have proliferated on public arenas for information and Data visualization (DV) represents a form of visual communication – in journalism, PR, governmental communication well
    [Show full text]
  • LINGUISTICS 160 Lecture #14 ANALYZING DISCOURSE
    LINGUISTICS 160 Lecture #14 ANALYZING DISCOURSE “Discourse analysis provides a tool for sociolinguists to identify the norms of talk among different social and cultural groups in different conversational and institutional contexts, and to describe the discursive resources people use in constructing different social identities in interaction”. (p. 364) Analyze the Exercise #1 on p. 363. Five approaches (among several more) to the analysis of discourse will be identified: (i) Pragmatics and politeness theory (ii) Ethnography of speaking (iii) Interactional sociolinguistics (iv) Conversation Analysis (CA) (v) Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) 1. Pragmatics and politeness theory 1.1 Pragmatics: The study of how context affects linguistic interaction. relationship between participants the analysis goes background knowledge beyond grammar and word meaning. Interpret the Examples #2 and #3 on p.364. 1.2 Conversational maxims and implicatures Assumption with regard to conversations: the speakers conform to the cooperative principle in accordance to four maxims (Grice, 1975): Quantity: say as much as but no more than is necessary Quality: do not say what you believe to be false, or that for which you lack evidence Relation: be relevant Manner: be clear, unambiguous, brief and orderly (p. 365) Do speakers always follow these maxim? 1 Study the Examples #6 and #7 on p. 366. Which maxim is not being followed? Possible reasons? These maxims are not universals – comment on the practice in the Malagasy Republic (p. 366). 1.3 Conversational maxims and politeness One of the reasons people don’t follow conversational maxims is their attempt to be polite. Lakoff’s three rules of politeness: p.367.
    [Show full text]
  • Presented Discourse Analysis in Popular Science Narratives of Discovery
    PRESENTED DISCOURSE ANALYSIS IN POPULAR SCIENCE NARRATIVES OF DISCOVERY by OLGA A. PILKINGTON A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of English School of English, Drama, and American and Canadian Studies The University of Birmingham December 2015 i University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis reports a study of presented discourse in popular science narratives of discovery in English. It focuses on the fictionalizing role of presented discourse. The thesis proposes minor adjustments to the existing models of presented discourse analysis, dividing discourse presentation into Public Discourse (speech/writing) and Private Discourse (thought). After exploring the forms and functions of discourse presentation in the narratives, the thesis concludes that Private Discourse prefers the forms commonly associated with non-fiction while assigning to them the functions most often observed in fiction. All the forms of discourse presentation in the narratives contain dramatizing properties, yet Public Discourse possesses the highest degree of dramatization. Private Discourse in the narratives possesses communicative properties generally assigned to speech/writing presentation exclusively.
    [Show full text]