Inquiry Into the Redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inquiry Into the Redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre Inquiry into the redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre Report No. 26, 56th Parliament Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee March 2020 Inquiry into the redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre Report No. 26, 56th Parliament Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee March 2020 Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee Chair Mr Duncan Pegg MP, Member for Stretton1 Deputy Chair Mr Jon Krause MP, Member for Scenic Rim Members Ms Sandy Bolton MP, Member for Noosa Mr Mark Boothman MP, Member for Theodore2 Ms Cynthia Lui MP, Member for Cook Mrs Charis Mullen MP, Member for Jordan Committee Secretariat Telephone +61 7 3553 6662 Fax +61 7 3553 6699 Email [email protected] Technical Scrutiny +61 7 3553 6601 Secretariat Committee webpage www.parliament.qld.gov.au/itdec Acknowledgements The committee acknowledges the assistance provided by the Department of Environment and Science, the Department of Housing and Public Works and the staff of the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service at the Mon Repos Turtle Centre. 1 On 4 February 2020, the Leader of the House appointed the Member for Bancroft, Chris Whiting MP, as substitute Chair of the committee for the Member for Stretton, Duncan Pegg MP, to attend the committee’s meetings and hearings from 10 to 11 February 2020. 2 On 7 February 2020, the Leader of the Opposition appointed the Member for Bundaberg, David Batt MP, as substitute member of the committee for the Member for Theodore, Mark Boothman MP, to attend the committee’s meetings and hearings from 10 to 11 February 2020. Inquiry into the redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre Contents List of Tables iii Abbreviations iv Chair’s foreword v Recommendation vi Committee conclusions vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Role of the committee 1 1.2 Scope of the inquiry 1 1.3 Inquiry process 2 2 Background 3 2.1 Location and site 3 2.2 Turtle conservation and research 4 2.3 Historic and cultural heritage 4 2.4 Regional tourism 5 2.5 Turtle experiences at the centre 5 2.5.1 Mon Repos Turtle Encounters 5 2.5.2 Mon Repos Turtle Tales 6 2.6 Operation and stakeholders 6 2.6.1 Operational responsibilities 6 2.6.2 Stakeholders 6 3 Terms of Reference 9 3.1 Purpose of the work 9 3.2 Necessity and advisability of the work 9 3.2.1 Option assessment process 10 3.2.2 Scope of public works 11 3.2.3 Photographs of the redeveloped facility 12 3.3 Suitability of the works for the purpose 12 3.3.1 Location and site suitability 12 3.3.2 Size and scale 13 3.3.3 Access to and from the site 14 3.3.4 Café and catering facilities 16 3.3.5 Technical and environmental performance 17 3.3.6 Department response to stakeholder views 18 3.4 Value for money achieved by the work 18 3.4.1 Benchmarking 19 3.5 Estimated revenue and project costs 20 3.5.1 Project costs 20 3.5.2 Estimated recurrent costs and revenue 21 3.6 Public value of the work, including the impact of the work on the community, economy and environment 22 3.6.1 Community 22 Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee i Inquiry into the redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre 3.6.2 Economy 23 3.6.3 Environment 24 3.7 Procurement methods for the work 26 3.7.1 Project time frames 26 3.7.2 Major consultants and contractors 26 3.8 Balance of public and private sector involvement in the works 27 3.9 Performance of the constructing authority and consultants and contractors for the work 27 3.9.1 Compliance with contractual obligations 28 3.9.2 Timely completion of works 28 3.9.3 Requests for information 28 3.9.4 Variations to the project 29 3.10 Other issues raised by stakeholders 30 3.10.1 Local artwork 30 3.10.2 Traffic management in the region leading to Mon Repos 30 3.11 Future developments 30 3.11.1 Negotiations to purchase neighbouring land 30 3.11.2 Future business opportunities 31 3.11.3 Project evaluation 32 Appendix A – Detailed questions asked of the Department of Environment and Science 33 Appendix B – Submitters 35 Appendix C – Witnesses at public briefing 36 Appendix D – Witnesses at public hearing and forum 37 Appendix E – Project budget as at November 2019 38 Appendix F – Approved variation costs as at 3 February 2020 39 Statement of Reservation 44 ii Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee Inquiry into the redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre List of Tables Table 1: Project budget .............................................................................................................................. 20 Table 2: Estimated recurrent costs ............................................................................................................ 21 Table 3: Estimated revenue ........................................................................................................................ 21 Table 4: Ticket price increases, 2018/19 to 2019/20 ................................................................................. 21 Table 5: Project time frames ...................................................................................................................... 26 Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee iii Inquiry into the redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre Abbreviations BAS Building and Asset Services division (within DHPW) centre Mon Repos Turtle Centre conservation park Mon Repos Conservation Park DHPW Department of Housing and Public Works QPWS Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service (within DES) RFIs Requests for Information WBBEC Wide Bay Burnett Environment Council iv Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee Inquiry into the redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre Chair’s foreword This report presents a summary of the Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee’s examination of the public works inquiry into the redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre. All inquiry participants were unanimous in their position that the redeveloped Mon Repos Turtle Centre is an important addition to the local tourism offering in the Bundaberg area and Queensland as a whole. Importantly, the design and construction of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre has achieved an appropriate balance between meeting tourism and community expectations, and ensuring that conservation of the marine turtles at Mon Repos continues. While lessons can always be learnt from public work projects such as this, the committee is satisfied that the project has and will continue to deliver a range of environmental, economic and community benefits. On behalf of the committee, I thank those who made written submissions to the inquiry, and took the time to appear as witnesses at the Bundaberg public hearing. I also thank the Department of Environment and Science, the Department of Housing and Public Works, and Parliamentary Service staff for their support throughout this inquiry. It was unfortunate that I was unable to attend the site inspection and public hearing. I therefore thank Chris Whiting MP for acting as Chair during this time. I also thank my committee colleagues for their valuable contributions throughout. In closing, I commend the work of the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service representatives, and the many volunteers who work to protect the nesting turtles and provide a unique and world-class visitor experience at the Mon Repos Turtle Centre. I commend this report to the House. Duncan Pegg MP Chair Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee v Inquiry into the redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre Recommendation Recommendation 1 32 The committee recommends the Legislative Assembly note the contents of this report. vi Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee Inquiry into the redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre Committee conclusions The committee has concluded that it is satisfied that: • the work was necessary and advisable • the work was suitable for its purpose • the work was reasonable value for money • the cost, and estimated recurrent costs of the work are reasonable • the work has had, and will continue to have, a positive impact on the community, the economy and the environment • the procurement methods adopted were appropriate • the balance of public and private sector involvement in the work was appropriate • the construction work was completed according to specifications, within the revised construction work program, and that contractual obligations were met by appointed contractors. Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee vii Inquiry into the redevelopment of the Mon Repos Turtle Centre 1 Introduction 1.1 Role of the committee The Innovation, Tourism Development and Environment Committee (committee) is a portfolio committee of the Legislative Assembly which commenced on 15 February 2018 under the Parliament of Queensland Act 2001 and the Standing Rules and Orders of the Legislative Assembly.3 The committee’s primary areas of responsibility include: • Innovation and Tourism Industry Development and Cross River Rail • Environment and the Great Barrier Reef, Sciences and the Arts. Under section 94 of the Parliament of Queensland Act 2001, the committee has the following responsibilities to the extent that they relate to the committee’s portfolio areas: a) the assessment of the integrity, economy, efficiency and effectiveness of government financial management by— i. examining government financial documents ii. considering the annual and other reports of the auditor-general b) works (public works) undertaken by an entity that is a constructing authority for the
Recommended publications
  • Legislative Assembly Hansard 1978
    Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly WEDNESDAY, 31 MAY 1978 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Address in Reply [31 MAY 1978] Ministerial Statement 1311 "I pray that the blessings of Almighty God may rest upon your counsels. "JAMBS RAMSAY, "Governor." PAPERS The following papers were laid on the table:- Order in Council under the Justices Act 1886-1977. Regulations under- Bills of Sale and Other Instruments Act 1955-1971. Contractors' Trust Accounts Act 1974. Co-operative and Other Societies Act 1967-1978. Elections Act 1915-1976. Liquor Act 1912-1976. MINISTERIAL STATEMENT ------------------------- ANCIENT ORDER OF FORESTERS' FRIENDLY WEDNESDAY, 31 MAY 1978 SoCIETY Hon. L. R. EDWARDS (Ipswich-Minis­ ter for Health) (11.4 a.m.): I would draw Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. J. E. H. Houghton, the attention of honourable members to the Redcliffe) read prayers and took the chair statement in "The Courier-Mail" of 30 May at 11 a.m. 1978 concerning the Ancient Order of For­ esters' Friendly Society in Queensland and to the interim statement made by my col­ ADDRESS IN REPLY league the Honourable the Minister for Justice and Attorney-General on 30 March PRESENTATION AND ANSWER this year. Mr. SPEAKER: I have to inform the The newspaper article drew attention to House that, accompanied by honourable the fact that the person appointed by the members, I this day presented to His Excel­ trustees to administer the society's affairs, lency the Governor the Address of the Mr. K. B. Cooper, had tendered his resigna­ Legislative Assembly, adopted by this House tion. The report also indicated that the on 18 May, in reply to His Excellency's trustees of the society had themselves resigned Opening Speech, and that His Excellency has as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Bundaberg Regional Council Multi Modal Pathway Strategy Connecting Our Region
    Bundaberg Regional Council Multi Modal Pathway Strategy Connecting our Region February 2012 Contents 1. Study Background 1 2. Study Objectives 2 3. Purpose of a Multi Modal Pathway Network 3 3.1 How do we define ‘multi modal’ 3 3.2 Community Benefits of a Multi Modal Network 3 3.3 What Characteristics Should a Multi Modal Network Reflect? 4 3.4 Generators of Trips 5 3.5 Criteria for Ascertaining Location of Proposed Paths 6 4. Review of Previous Multi Modal Pathway Strategy Plans 8 4.1 Bundaberg City Council Interim Integrated Open Space and Multi Modal Pathway Network Study 2006 8 4.2 Burnett Shire Walk and Cycle Plan – For a Mobile Community 2004 9 4.3 Bundaberg – Burnett Regional Sport and Recreation Strategy 2006 9 4.4 Kolan Shire Sport and Recreation Plan 2004 10 4.5 Bundaberg Region Social Plan 2006 10 4.6 Woodgate Recreational Trail 10 5. Proposed Multi Modal Pathway Strategy 11 5.1 Overall Outcomes of the Multi-Modal Pathway Network 11 5.2 Hierarchy Classification 11 5.3 Design and Construction Standards 13 5.4 Weighting Criteria for Locating Pathways and Prioritising Path Construction 14 5.5 Pathway Network for the Former Bundaberg City Council Local Government Area 17 5.6 Pathway Network for the former Burnett Shire Council Local Government Area 18 5.7 Pathway Network for the former Isis Shire Council Local Government Area 20 5.8 Pathway Network for the Former Kolan Shire Council Local Government Area 21 5.9 Integration with Planning Schemes 21 5.10 Other Pathway Opportunities 22 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poultry Industry Regulations of 1946 Queensland Reprint
    Warning “Queensland Statute Reprints” QUT Digital Collections This copy is not an authorised reprint within the meaning of the Reprints Act 1992 (Qld). This digitized copy of a Queensland legislation pamphlet reprint is made available for non-commercial educational and research purposes only. It may not be reproduced for commercial gain. ©State of Queensland "THE POULTRY INDUSTRY REGULATIONS OF 1946" Inserted by regulations published Gazette 3 March 1947, p. 761; and amended by regulations published Gazette 13 November 1968, p. 2686; 23 July, 1949, p. 224; 25 March 1950, p. 1166; 20 January 1951, p. 162; 9 June 1951, p. 686; 8 November 1952, p. 1136; 16 May 1953, p. 413; 2 July 1955, p. 1118; 3 March 1956, p. 633; 5 April 1958, p. 1543; 14 June 1958, p. 1488, 13 December 1958, p. 1923; 25 April 1959, p. 2357; 10 October 1959, p. 896; 12 December 1959, p. 2180; 12 March 1960, pp. 1327-30; 2 April 1960, p. 1601; 22 April1961, p. 22.53; 11 August 1962, p. 1785; 23 November 1963, p. 1011; 22 February 1964, p. 710; 7 March 1964, p. 865; 16 January 1965, p. 117; 3 July 1965, p. 1323; 12 February 1966, p. 1175; 26 February 1966, p. 1365; 16 April 1966, p. 1983; 7 May 1966, pp. 160-1; 9 July 1966, p. 1352; 27 August 1966, p. 2022. Department of Agriculture and Stock, Brisbane, 27th February, 1947. HIS Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has, in pursuance of the provisions of "The Poultry Industry Act of 1946," been pleased to make the following Regulations:- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Towns and Hinterland Areas
    FACT SHEET 3 RURAL TOWNS AND HINTERLAND AREAS Council and the community’s vision is for the Bundaberg Region to be “vibrant, progressive, connected and sustainable”. To achieve this vision, Council has prepared the Bundaberg Regional Council Planning Scheme to help manage future land use and development in the Bundaberg Region. The planning scheme aims to strengthen the economy, support local communities, protect and sustainably manage the natural environment and provide targeted investments in infrastructure. The planning scheme provides a framework for sustainable growth management with a time horizon of 2031. This fact sheet has been prepared to provide a summary of the requirements in the planning scheme most relevant to the rural towns and hinterland areas in the Bundaberg Region. Rural Towns and Hinterland Areas Queensland’s Lifestyle Capital The Bundaberg Region covers an area of approximately CHILDERS & GIN GIN – HOUSING CHOICE 6,451 km². Almost 90% of the region forms part of the AND RESIDENTIAL GROWTH rural landscape, incorporating natural environmental The planning scheme provides for a range of housing areas, public open space, forestry and rural production types and densities to accommodate projected growth areas. in the region over the next 20+ years. While most demand for urban growth and residential The rural towns of Childers and Gin Gin provide a development is intended to be concentrated in the range of business, retail, employment and community regional city of Bundaberg and nearby coastal towns, services to their surrounding rural communities, and the planning scheme also provides opportunities also serve as gateways to the region on the Bruce for the growth of rural towns and villages across the Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • The Queensland Government Spends Over $100 Million Per Year on Office
    QueenslandQueensland Government Government Gazette Gazette PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 345] Friday, 11 May, 2007 The Queensland Government spends over $100 million per year on office supplies! SDS is the only Queensland Government So, even if your agency has a contract owned supplier of office consumables with another supplier, why not give SDS and furniture and our mission is to “a go” outside the basket of goods? ensure you get value for money! We offer excellent service, quality products, highly competitive pricing and SDS is committed to helping government a long term, sustainable value package agencies spend wisely, and spend less, for Queensland Government buyers. not more. Did you know, you can buy from us without 3 quotes and without Call the friendly SDS Customer Service going through a tender process? team on 1800 801 123 now! SDS Service, solutions and savings! Queensland Government Department of Public Works [123] QueenslandQueensland GovernmentGovernment Gazette Gazette Natural Resources and Water PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 345] Friday, 11 May, 2007 [No. 8 Land Act 1994 Resources and Water. AMENDMENT OF TENURE DOCUMENT ORDER 4. File Reference – 2006/005357 (No 26) 2007 Land Act 1994 Short title 1. This order in council may be cited as the Amendment of Tenure RESERVE AND SET APART NOTICE (No 15) 2007 Document Order (No 26) 2007. Short title Amendment of tenure document [s.360(1)(f) of the Act] 1. This notice may be cited as the Reserve and Set Apart Notice 2. The tenure document described in Schedule 1 is amended as (No 15) 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • BRISBANE Qld 4000 (PO Box 13038 George Street Post Shop Brisbane Qld 4003) Tel:(07)3503-1111 Fax:(07)3503-1199
    AUSCRIPT AUSTRALASIA PTY LTD ABN 72 110 028 825 Level 10, 15 Adelaide St BRISBANE Qld 4000 (PO Box 13038 George Street Post Shop Brisbane Qld 4003) Tel:(07)3503-1111 Fax:(07)3503-1199 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION BURCHETT J, Chair INQUIRY INTO OBJECTIONS TO THE QUEENSLAND PROPOSED RE-DISTRIBUTION OF FEDERAL ELECTORAL BOUNDARIES BRISBANE 9.32 AM, WEDNESDAY, 30 AUGUST 2006 feddis 30.8.06 1 ©Auscript Australasia Pty Ltd 2006 feddis 30.8.06 2 ©Auscript Australasia Pty Ltd 2006 CHAIR: I think we will commence proceedings. I'm sorry that the space is not as ample as we would have desired, but it's the best we could arrange. And anyway, those who are here are all seated. That's almost full seats. And I'll now commence. I will commence with - as I've done at previous such 5 gatherings - I'll commence with a brief explanation, for those who are not experts on the details of electoral administration, of what has brought us here and what we're doing. Under the Commonwealth Electoral Law, there is an Electoral Commissioner, who is Mr Ian Campbell on my right, to administer the department dealing with elections. 10 There is also an Electoral Commission to determine electoral questions at an independent level. It consists of three members. Firstly, a chairperson, who must be a Federal Court judge or a former judge of that court, chosen from three persons nominated by the Chief Justice of the Federal Court. I am the 15 chairperson, and my name is James Burchett.
    [Show full text]
  • Burnett River Catchment Flood Resilience Strategy
    A connected catchment Burnett Catchment Flood Resilience Strategy – an overview A pilot partnership to improve flood resilience across the Burnett River Catchment May 2018 Document details: Security classification Approved Date of review of security May 2018 classification Authority Queensland Reconstruction Authority Author Executive Director, Resilience Document status Final Version 1.0 Contact for Enquiries: All enquiries regarding this document should be directed: Queensland Reconstruction Authority Phone the call centre – 1800 110 841 Email [email protected] Mailing Address Queensland Reconstruction Authority PO Box 15428 City East QLD 4002 Licence This material is licensed under a Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International licence. The Queensland Reconstruction Authority requests attribution in the following manner: © The State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority) 2018. Information security The document has been classified using the Queensland Government Information Security Classification Framework (QGISF) as PUBLIC and will be managed according to the requirements of the QGISF. Queenslanders are disaster resilient when... we work together we continually to better manage improve how we disaster risk prepare, respond and recover from disasters we seek new we understand opportunities to our risk reduce disaster risk 2 Burnett Catchment Flood Resilience Strategy – an overview Foreword A connected catchment is a resilient catchment. The Burnett region has endured several severe weather events in recent years, from the devastating floods of 2013, to local flooding from heavy rainfall and significant property damage from severe thunderstorms. These experiences have taught us to value the things that make us resilient - our networks, our sense of community, our connection to the landscape and our strong desire for a happy and healthy lifestyle.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard 22 February 1994
    Legislative Assembly 7031 22 February 1994 TUESDAY, 22 FEBRUARY 1994 Officials in Parliament Act— Administrative Arrangements Order 1994. Mr SPEAKER (Hon. J. Fouras, Ashgrove) PAPER read prayers and took the chair at 10 a.m. The following paper was laid on the table— Minister for Lands (Mr Smith)— STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS Foreign Ownership of Land Register— Annual Report for 1992-93 In accordance with the schedule circulated by the Clerk to members in the Chamber, the Ordered to be printed. following documents were tabled— Acts Interpretation Act— MINISTERIAL STATEMENT Administrative Arrangements Order 1994 Queensland Economic Review Building and Construction Industry (Portable Hon K. E. De LACY (Cairns— Treasurer) Long Service Leave) Act— (10.01 a.m.), by leave: Last week, in outlining to Building and Construction Industry the House the outcome of the mid-year Budget (Portable Long Service Leave) Amendment review, I referred to indications of a Regulation (No. 1) 1994, No. 51 strengthening economy. I made particular Cemetery Act— mention of improving business investment in Cemetery (Gympie Cemetery) Amendment Queensland. Rule (No. 1) 1994, No. 49 I am pleased to report that confirmation of a City of Brisbane Market Act— stronger than forecast business investment City of Brisbane Market (Accommodation) performance is contained in the December Regulation 1994, No. 46 quarter edition of the Queensland Economic Clean Air Act— Review, copies of which will be circulated to all Clean Air Amendment Regulation (No. 1) honourable members today. Business 1994, No. 53 investment has been making a renewed positive Clean Air (Ozone Depleting Substances) contribution to the State's economic growth in Regulation 1994, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly Hansard 1969
    Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly THURSDAY, 28 AUGUST 1969 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy 254 Questions [ASSEMBLY] Questions THURSDAY, 28 AUGUST, 1969 (2) Is he aware that the children referred to would be capable of complet­ ing their secondary-course studies at the Brisbane State High School without lower­ Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. D. E. Nicholson, ing its achievements? Murrumba) read prayers and took the chair at 11 a.m. ( 3) Is he aware that the nearest high school to New Farm State School is the QUESTIONS Brisbane State High School and that there is no high school available to New Farm CARD RECORDING OF MOTOR VEHICLE pupils which does not necessitate at least SPEEDS BY RADAR UNITS one change of transport and that in some Mr. Houston, pursuant to notice, asked cases at least three changes are necessary? The Minister for Works,- ( 4) In these circumstances, will he give Has the Government given any con­ consideration to having an allocation of a sideration to the possibility of radar minimum number of places in the first machines being so equipped with a year, i.e., grade 8, at the Brisbane State recording card showing the speed at which High School, reserved for the benefit of motor vehicles were travelling, that a card New Farm State School pupils? could be issued for each alleged offence? If not, why not? If so, with what result? Answers:- ( 1) "Yes." Answer:- (2) "Yes." "Yes. However, it is not possible to equip radar units being used by the (3) "Yes." police with any device capable of pro­ ( 4) "In order to reduce the size of ducing a card indicating the speed of a the Brisbane State High School, enrol­ relevant vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Minute
    - ...., DECISION NO. CABINET MINUTE BRISBANE, ~o I J / 19if? Amendment of the Tobacco Industry Protection Regulations of 1966. -----------------------(Submission No. Coples Received at .f .;lo ~ 070 p.m. 'Pies Made Cl RC ULA TION DETAILS GOVERNOR Decision _Fj le 1 21 ' . • 2 MR. AHERN 22 • I I Jl-'r J .1'!1i I ' 3 23 M~- r..rtt,JN 4 MR. GIBBS 24 5 MR. GLASSON 25 6 MR. AUSTIN 26 7 MR. LESTER 27 MR. TENN I 8 Cf 28 ' 9 MR. HARPER cf 29 10 MR. MUNTZ 30 11 31 MR. MCKECHN :E 12 MR. KATTER 32 13 MR. NEAL 33 14 MR. CLAUSON 34 15 MR. BORBIDG ~ 35 16 MR. RANDELL 36 17 MR. COOPER 37 18 MRS. HARVEY 38 19 MR. LITTLEP ~OUD 39 Master File 20 40 inches 3 I cm • 1 2 7 Kodak Color Control Patches o Kodak, 2001' TM: Kodak Blue Cyan Green Yellow Rad White 3/Color Black ' ~ I' " ' -·.' :;- 3 "' "'=:r CD CD "' c: - CD 6' a. I\) GI (') ~ ~ () ::::s 0 0- • ...... (J1 ~ () CD Q ::::s ::l ar+ Copy No. 2"0 C 0 N F I D E N T I A L C A B I N E T M I N U T E Brisbane, 30th May, 1988 Decision Noe 54384 TITLE: Amendment of the Tobacco Industry Submission No. 49038 Protection Regulations of 1966. CABINET decided:- That it be recommended to the Governor in Council that Regulations in accordance with the draft accompanying the Submission, be promulgated. CIRCULATION: Department of Primary Industries and copy to rtinister. The Honourable the Minister for Mines and Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Bundaberg-Fraser Coast Tourism Opportunity Plan
    Bundaberg-Fraser Coast Tourism Opportunity Plan 2 0 0 9 – 2 0 1 9 DISCLAIMER – STATE GOVERNMENT DISCLAIMER – THESTAFFORDGROUP The Queensland Government makes no claim as to the accuracy of the Any representation, statement, opinion or advice, expressed or implied in information contained in the Bundaberg-Fraser Coast Tourism this document is made in good faith but on the basis that TheStaffordGroup Opportunity Plan. The document is not a prospectus and the information is not liable (whether by reason of negligence, lack of care or otherwise) provided is general in nature. The document should not be relied upon as to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever which has occurred or the basis for financial and investment related decisions. This document may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking (as the case may does not suggest or imply that the Queensland State Government or any be) action in respect of any representation, statement or advice referred other government, agency, organisation or person should be responsible to in this document. for funding any projects or initiatives identified in this document. Contents Acronyms . 1 Executive summary ..................................................................................... 2 1 Context ......................................................................................... 6 1.1 The Bundaberg and Fraser Coast Regions . 6 1.2 The Development and Promotion of the Regions . 8 2 Methodology .................................................................................... 10 2.1 Steps taken to compile this TOP................................................................... 10 2.2 Data sources and limitations . 10 3 A Vision for the Bundaberg and Fraser Coast Regions ................................................. 11 3.1 A Vision for the Bundaberg Region . 11 3.2 A Vision for the Fraser Coast Region................................................................ 12 Contents 3.3 Regional Uniqueness...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downloading Documents Phone Kingaroy; P.O
    Queensland Government Gazette PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. CCCXXXIV] FRIDAY, 5 SEPTEMBER, 2003 ENTERING IS EASY. All you need to do is switch your home, contents, TURN YOUR car or investment property insurance to CGU Membersafe Insurance through Queenslanders Credit Union before 30 September 2003*. Really, It’s that simple. HOUSE AND CAR And to make it even simpler for you to change your insurance, we’ll provide you with all the paperwork INTO A HOLIDAY necessary to switch your current policies. Then, with just a little bit of luck, you and a friend will soon be escaping for 3 luxurious nights to the beautiful Rydges Capricorn Resort in Tropical North Queensland. You’ll enjoy a delicious breakfast for two each morning, play a challenging round of golf together on the reknowned championship course and receive $450 in cash to help get you there. PLUS, GET A FEW BUCKS FOR YOURSELF. You’ll also receive a $20 Myer/Grace Bros gift voucher for insuring your home, contents or car through Queenslanders†. And for every other person you refer, who also decides to switch and insure through Queenslanders, we’ll give you another $20 Myer/Grace Bros gift voucher for your efforts. Call us on 07 3218 7204 today for an obligation free insurance quote. *†Terms and conditions apply and are available upon INSURANCE request in branch and at www.queenslanders.com.au Win a 3 day escape to Rydges Capricorn Resort SA Licence No. T03/2436 NSW residents ineligble. Queenslanders Credit Union Limited ABN 85 087 651 063 is an agent for CGU Insurance when you insure your home, it’s contents or your Limited ABN 27 004 478 371.
    [Show full text]