Laporan Tahunan Annual Report2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Laporan Tahunan Annual Report2010 LAPORAN TAHUNAN ANNUAL REPORT2010 TINJAUAN KEUANGAN PROFIL DIREKSI FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 02 BOARD OF DIRECTOR’S PROFILE 48 LAPORAN PRESIDEN KOMISARIS PRESIDENT COMMISSIONER’S KAJIAN OPERASIONAL REPORT 06 REVIEW OF OPERATION 56 NET INCOME (US$m) ANALISA DAN DISKUSI MANAJEMEN LAPORAN PRESIDEN DIREKTUR MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION 42 2 2 PRESIDENT DIRECTOR’SREPORT 10 AND ANALYSIS 80 2008 2009 2010 PROFIL PERUSAHAAN INFORMASI PERUSAHAAN COMPANY PROFILE 18 COMPANY INFORMATION 86 LAPORAN KEUANGAN KONSOLIDASI TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 28 STATEMENTS 90 DAFTAR ISI PROFIL DEWAN KOMISARIS BOARD OF COMMISSIONER’S CONTENTS PROFILE 46 PT. PETROSEA Tbk PT. PETROSEA Tbk 02 ANNUAL REPORT 2010 ANNUAL REPORT 2010 03 STATISTIK 5 TAHUN TERAKHIR (Dalam Ribuan Dollar AS) TINJAUAN 5 Years Historical Statistics (in thousand USD) KEUANGAN Financial Highlights PENDAPATAN LAL BA 50,0 0 0 Description USAHA 20 0,0 0 0 SEBELUS M 4 0,0 0 0 150,0 0 0 30,0 0 0 Description Unit 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Operating PPAJAK Revenue 125,0 0 0 PPENGHASILAN 20,0 0 0 10 0,0 0 0 10,0 0 0 Pendapatan usaha / Operating revenue Rb USD/Th USD 105,724 125,962 205,794 171,826 186,949 Profit before 95,0 0 0 Income Tax 5,0 0 0 Rb USD/Th USD 17,483 30,671 55,399 Laba kotor / Gross profit 23,801 55,266 9 0,0 0 0 4 4 2 4 6 6 49 4 0 79 79 96 24 72 82 82 14 Rb USD/Th USD 8,106 12,622 10,869 39,497 38,296 8 0,0 0 0 , , 40 Laba usaha/ Operating income 64 5 5, 6,9 5, 5, ,4 1, 1 ,593 ,4 5 56 040 , 17 10 12 20 17 18 10 11 5,5, 4 20 4, Laba sebelum pajak penghasilan / Rb USD/Th USD 10,424 11,414 5,040 4,564 51,593 51 Profit before Income tax 2006 2007 200808 22009009 201100 2006 2007 200808 20092009 201010 Laba bersih / Net income Rb USD/Th USD 6,438 7,097 1,775 1,590 42,254 Rasio laba bersih atas pendapatan usaha / % 6.09 5.63 0.86 0.93 22.60 Ratio net income to operating revenue 6 4,0 0 0 Pembayaran dividen/ Dividend paid Rb USD/Th USD - 4,497 - - 1,590 LABA BERSIH 32,0 0 0 Jt /Mn 102.60 102.60 102.60 100.86 100.86 16,0 0 0 Jumlah saham yang ditempatkan dan disetor Net Income penuh / Number of share issued and paid up 8,0 0 0 Jumlah saham yang diperoleh kembali / Jt /Mn 1.74 1.74 1.74 - - 4,0 0 0 Number of treasury stocks 2,0 0 0 Laba bersih per saham / Net income per share USD 0.0638 0.0704 0.0176 0.0158 0.4189 1,0 0 0 8 0 0 5 5 16,698 20,900 7 Modal kerja bersih / Net working capital Rb USD/Th USD 42,105 37,607 2,423 9 43 59 5 77 77 09 , 1, 6, 7, 1 1, 1, 42,254 Jumlah aset / Total assets Rb USD/Th USD 119,993 148,638 178,268 194,509 222,512 Pembelanjaan modal / Capital expenditure Rb USD/Th USD 16,581 25,684 45,080 47,085 60,264 2006 2007 200808 20092009 2010 Penyusutan/ Depreciation Rb USD/Th USD 8,404 10,613 13,775 21,947 26,324 Jumlah kewajiban / Total liabilities Rb USD/Th USD 45,119 72,227 107,611 114,498 101,837 JUMLAH 250,0 0 0 130,0 0 0 Jumlah ekuitas / Total equity Rb USD/Th USD 74,874 76,411 70,657 80,011 120,675 JUMLAH ASET 20 0,0 0 0 EKUITAS 120,0 0 0 Rasio laba bersih atas jumlah aset / % 5.37 4.77 1.00 0.82 18.99 Total Assets 150,0 0 0 Total Equity 110,0 0 0 Ratio of net income to total assets 125,0 0 0 10 0,0 0 0 Rasio laba bersih atas ekuitas / % 8.60 9.29 2.51 1.99 35.01 10 0,0 0 0 9 0,0 0 0 Ratio of net income to equity 95,0 0 0 8 0,0 0 0 Rasio lancar / Current ratio Rasio/Ratio 2.27 1.71 1.22 1.34 1.04 9 0,0 0 0 70,00 0 8 9 9 8 8 2 3 7 57 11 11 51 11 50 50 63 26 74 8 0,0 0 0 99 6 0,0 0 0 60.26 152.30 0 Rasio jumlah kewajiban atas ekuitas / % 94.52 143.10 84.39 65 ,0 , , 0,675 4, 4, 8, 8,26 ,8 9, 0 78, 76,4 70,6 80 74 70 8 12 Ratio of total liabilities to equity 11 14 117 1919 222, Rasio jumlah kewajiban atas aset / % 37.60 48.59 60.36 58.87 45.77 2006 2007 200808 20092009 201010 2006 2007 200808 20092009 2010 Ratio of total liabilities to total assets Rb/Th : Ribuan Thousand USD/USD : Dolar Amerika Serikat United States SINGKATAN Jt /Mn : Juta Million Dollars Abreviations % : Persen Percentage PT. PETROSEA Tbk PT. PETROSEA Tbk 04 ANNUAL REPORT 2010 ANNUAL REPORT 2010 05 PENDAPATAN USAHA (Dalam Ribuan Dollar AS) INFORMASI SAHAM Operating Revenue (in thousand USD) Share Information PENDAPATAN USAHA PER LINI BISNIS - OPERATING REVENUE PER BUSSINESS LINE HARGA 4 5,0 0 0 SAHAM 12,0 0 0 Share Price 40,0 0 0 Bussiness Line 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2010 % 5 Year Average 10,0 0 0 3 5,0 0 0 Mining 74,624 75,546 106,203 136,913 157,529 84.3% 69.2% 30,0 0 0 Engineering & Construction 16,809 31,593 82,031 13,759 5,162 2.7% 18.4% 8,0 0 0 Services 14,061 18,429 17,064 20,615 24,094 12.9% 12.2% 25,0 0 0 6,0 0 0 Others 230 394 496 539 164 0.1% 0.2% 20,0 0 0 TOTAL 105,724 125,962 205,794 171,826 186,949 100% 100% 4,0 0 0 15,0 0 0 10,0 0 0 2,0 0 0 2009 2010 5,0 0 0 IDR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 IDR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 BAGAN PENDAPATAN USAHA PER LINI BISNIS TAHUN 2010 CLOSE 10,350 9,90 0 10,350 10,350 CLOSE 9,0 0 0 11,50 0 27,6 0 0 26,0 0 0 CHART OF OPERATING REVENUE PER BUSSINESS LINE FOR 2010 HIGH 10,8 50 10,50 0 10,350 10,350 HIGH 10,50 0 11,50 0 27,6 0 0 41,50 0 LOW 4,175 9,6 0 0 9,6 0 0 10,0 0 0 LOW 9,90 0 9,0 0 0 11,50 0 26,0 0 0 0 00 00 50 ,5 ,0 VOLUME 7, 87 8 43 90,0 0 0 PERDAGANGAN ,2 80,0 0 0 12,0 0,0 0 0 11 SAHAM 70,00 0 Share Volume 10,0 0 0,0 0 0 00 00 ,5 6 0,0 0 0 ,5 0 484 48 0 8,0 0 0,0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 50,0 0 0 50 5 0, ,5 , , ,5 40,0,00 0 1 313 31 31 000 6,0 0 0,0 0 0 75 4, 3030,0,00 0 4,0 0 0,0 0 0 672, 2, 2020,,000 0 000 2009 2,0 0 0,0 0 0 1, 2010 1010,,000 0 LEMBAR SAHAM Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 LEMBAR SAHAM Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 SHARE SHARE PEMEGANG SAHAM UTAMA PERUSAHAAN ASOSIASI MajorPEMEGANG Shareholder SAHAM UTAMA AssociatedPERUSAHA Company AN ASOSIASI PERTAMBANGAN JASA REKAYASA & KONSTRUKSI LAIN-LAIN Major Share Holder Associated Company Mining Service Engineering & Others Construction 84.3 % 12.9% 2.7 % 0.1% PT INDIKA % PT SANTAN % PT TIRTA KENCANA % ENERGY Tbk 98.55 BATUBARA 50 CAHAYA MANDIRI 47 PT. PETROSEA Tbk PT. PETROSEA Tbk 06 ANNUAL REPORT 2010 ANNUAL REPORT 2010 07 LAPORAN PRESIDEN KOMISARIS President Commissioner’s Report Dengan gembira kami melaporkan bahwa PT Petrosea Tbk menunjukkan peningkatan kinerja yang luar biasa sepanjang tahun 2010. Pendapatan meningkat 9% menjadi US$ 186,9 juta dan laba bersih meningkat hingga US$42.2 juta. I am delighted to report your company produced a significant improvement in performance in 2010. Revenue grew at 9% to US$ 186.9 million and net profits was substantially higher at US$ 42.2 million. atut pula dicatat bahwa perusahaan berhasil he year has also seen the successful convergence mengembangkan perusahaan asosiasi yang bergerak di in our Construction & Engineering capabilities. The signing of melakukan perbaikan di berbagai bidang: meningkatkan of multiple improvement programs e.g. Upgrading bidang pertambangan serta memanfaatkan kapabilitas kami Kideco in October 2010 as an additional contract customer has kapasitas armada yang akan digunakan untuk the contract mining fleet capacity; Establishment of dalam bidang jasa konstruksi dan rekayasa untuk mendukung boosted the portfolio of contractual commitments to about US$ Pkegiatan kontrak penambangan, membentuk Grup Manajemen Tan Asset Management Group (tasked with optimization of kegiatan usaha inti. Penandatanganan kontrak baru dengan 739.2 million.This includes POSB, our rapidly growing services Aset yang bertanggung jawab atas optimalisasi pemanfaatan equipment utilization and cost effectiveness); Carrying out the Kideco pada bulan Oktober 2010 serta kontrak-kontrak dari arm for the offshore oil and gas sector.
Recommended publications
  • Lampiran 5 Surat Kepala Pusat Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Jalan, Perumahan, Permukiman Dan Pengembangan Infrastruktur Wilayah Nomor
    Lampiran 5 Surat Kepala Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Jalan, Perumahan, Permukiman dan Pengembangan Infrastruktur Wilayah Nomor : PD O204-Mj/1154 Tanggal : 24 September 2018 FORMAT PROFIL KOTA Name : Arief Bandoro Sigit, ST Institutions : Balikpapan city government Participation City Profil About Your Country/Province 1 Name of Country/Province Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia 2 Population 3.575.449 3 GDP per capita in US$ US$ 12.380,51 4 Human Development Index 75.12 About Your City 1 Name of city Balikpapan City 2 Population 636.012 3 Main economic activities Processing industry 4 Monthly average income of a US $ 39,65 lowincome family in US$ 5 Briefly describe the main The main problems that must be handled by the Balikpapan problems in your city City government: (environmental, social, economic etc.) 1. Waste. The process of the occurrence of garbage is dominated by human activities. Population growth that continues to increase with a more consumptive lifestyle is certainly followed by increasing waste production 2. Floods. The emergence of new flood points in Balikpapan City caused by land clearing for those carried out sporadically by investors without regard to permits that have been issued and lack of supervision and firmness from the Balikpapan City government. 3. Clean water and raw water, Balikpapan City often turns supply of clean water supplies to customers, the existence of the Manggar Reservoir as the only raw water source for Balikpapan city PDAM is currently still having problems in the water discharge during the dry season. To increase the coverage of services for clean water and raw water, Teritip Reservoir has now been built and plans to develop Embung Aji Raden.
    [Show full text]
  • BUILDING on SYNERGIES ANNUAL REPORT 2012 PT INDIKA ENERGY Tbk
    PT INDIKA ENERGY Tbk. BUILDING ON SYNERGIES A NNUAL BUILDING ON R EPORT SYNERGIES 2012 ENERGY • SYNERGY PT INDIKA ENERGY Tbk. Mitra Building 7th Floor Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Kav.21, Jakarta 12930 - Indonesia [email protected] [email protected] www.indikaenergy.co.id ANNUAL REPORT 2012 synergy100_80_60 inggris.indd 1-3 5/6/13 8:43 PM CONTENTS THEME 2 “BUILDING ON SYNERGIES” 1. CORPORATE OVERVIEW 5 1.1 MILESTONES 6 1.2 VISION, MISSION AND VALUES 12 1.3 INDIKA ENERGY AT A GLANCE 14 1.4 CORPORATE AND ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE 22 2. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 27 2.1 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS – INDIKA ENERGY 28 2.2 STOCK HIGHLIGHTS 31 2.3 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS – ASSOCIATE COMPANY – KIDECO 32 3. PRESIDENT COMMISSIONER’S MESSAGE 37 4. PRESIDENT DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE 43 5. BOARD PROFILES AND SHAREHOLDERS OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 53 6. MANAGEMENT REPORT 67 6.1 ECONOMY AND INDUSTRY OVERVIEW 68 6.2 OPERATIONAL REVIEW 70 6.3 FINANCIAL REVIEW 84 6.4 BUSINESS PROSPECTS AND KEY RISK FACTORS 88 6.5 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (ICT) 90 6.6 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 92 6.7 HUMAN CAPITAL 107 6.8 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) 111 6.9 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS 115 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 117 8. COMPANY INFORMATION 119 BUILDING ON SYNERGIES Annual Report 2012 • PT Indika Energy Tbk. 1 BUILDING ON SYNERGIES Indika Energy prudently continues to pursue the corporate plan to become a fully integrated energy company by extracting greater value from the synergies of businesses across energy resources, energy services, and energy infrastructure, from exploration to mining, transhipment to customers, and usage of coal Indika Energy produces for power generation plants.
    [Show full text]
  • OPM Report Template Version 5
    Fecal Sludge Management: Diagnostics for Service Delivery in Urban Areas Case Study in Balikpapan, Indonesia Rebecca Scott, Ian Ross and Isabel Blackett Supporting document Final April 2016 Report of a FSM study in Balikpapan, Indonesia Preface / Acknowledgements This report is a city case study of a World Bank Economic and Sector Work on Fecal Sludge Management: Diagnostics for Service Delivery in Urban Areas (P146128). The task team leaders were Isabel Blackett and Peter Hawkins and task team members were Zael Sanz Uriarte, Ravikumar Joseph, Chris Heymans and Guy Hutton. This report is based on work conducted between January 2014 and February 2016 by Oxford Policy Management (OPM) in partnership with the Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC) at Loughborough University. The core research team was Ian Ross (OPM), Rebecca Scott (WEDC), Ana Mujica (OPM) and Mike Smith (WEDC). The broader team who contributed to the study included Zach White, Rashid Zaman and Simon Brook from OPM, as well as Andy Cotton and Sam Kayaga from WEDC. Andy Peal (independent consultant) also contributed to certain aspects of the methodology. The inputs of many other World Bank staff, consultants and data collection firms are acknowledged with thanks from the task team. They have contributed to the research, findings, analysis and reviews but are too numerous to mention. i Report of a FSM study in Balikpapan, Indonesia Executive summary Overview and key FSM service delivery challenge Balikpapan city, located in the province of East Kalimantan, Indonesia has a reported population of approximately 640,000 people and annual population growth of about 4.5% (approximately 1.5% due to natural growth and 3% due to immigration).
    [Show full text]
  • Balikpapan, Indonesia
    Public Disclosure Authorized Fecal Sludge Management: Diagnostics for Service Delivery in Urban Areas Public Disclosure Authorized Case Study in Balikpapan, Indonesia Rebecca Scott, Ian Ross and Isabel Blackett Public Disclosure Authorized Supporting document Final Public Disclosure Authorized April 2016 Report of a FSM study in Balikpapan, Indonesia Preface / Acknowledgements This report is a city case study of a World Bank Economic and Sector Work on Fecal Sludge Management: Diagnostics for Service Delivery in Urban Areas (P146128). The task team leaders were Isabel Blackett and Peter Hawkins and task team members were Zael Sanz Uriarte, Ravikumar Joseph, Chris Heymans and Guy Hutton. This report is based on work conducted between January 2014 and February 2016 by Oxford Policy Management (OPM) in partnership with the Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC) at Loughborough University. The core research team was Ian Ross (OPM), Rebecca Scott (WEDC), Ana Mujica (OPM) and Mike Smith (WEDC). The broader team who contributed to the study included Zach White, Rashid Zaman and Simon Brook from OPM, as well as Andy Cotton and Sam Kayaga from WEDC. Andy Peal (independent consultant) also contributed to certain aspects of the methodology. The inputs of many other World Bank staff, consultants and data collection firms are acknowledged with thanks from the task team. They have contributed to the research, findings, analysis and reviews but are too numerous to mention. i Report of a FSM study in Balikpapan, Indonesia Executive summary Overview and key FSM service delivery challenge Balikpapan city, located in the province of East Kalimantan, Indonesia has a reported population of approximately 640,000 people and annual population growth of about 4.5% (approximately 1.5% due to natural growth and 3% due to immigration).
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Community Development in East Kalimantan, Indonesia
    Coastal Community Development in East Kalimantan, Indonesia Final Report (December 2002 – December 2003) Submitted to: UNOCAL Foundation (Grant Agreement Number 2002-JGP) Submitted by: Coastal Resources Center University of Rhode Island In partnership with Save the Balikpapan Bay Foundation Balikpapan, East Kalimantan, Indonesia January 2004 Introduction The Coastal Resources Center at the University of Rhode Island (CRC-URI) and Yayasan Selamatkan Teluk Balikpapan or Save The Balikpapan Bay Foundation (YSTB) are implementing a Coastal Community Development Program (CCDP) in the Balikpapan Bay area of East Kalimantan Province of Indonesia. The first year of this program was funded primarily by the UNOCAL Foundation under Grant Agreement Number 2002-JGP-45. Additional support was provided through the USAID-URI Indonesian Coastal Resources Management Project (CRMP). This report summarizes activities undertaken during the twelve-month grant period from December 2002 through December 2003. The goal of the program is to build the capacity of local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and communities to implement community-based coastal development and management initiatives. The specific objectives of the program are to: 1) Develop the capacity of local NGOs to design and implement successful community- based coastal development and management programs. 2) Develop the capacity of coastal communities to actively engage in community-based resource management, formulate community development initiatives, and conduct active dialogue with local government and the private sector that leads to mutual agreements concerning resource use conflicts. 3) Develop and strengthen a network of NGOs which actively provides services to coastal communities and which is capable of raising donor funding to support these activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenurial Problems in Protection Forest and Grand Forest Park Area
    TENURIAL PROBLEMS IN PROTECTION FOREST AND GRAND FOREST PARK AREA This is the Academic Paper of the 2017 Tenure Conference: Realizing People’s Rights: Land Tenure Reform & Forest Management in Indonesia which was held in Jakarta, 25-27 October 2017. Published : Tropenbos Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia Copyright : @2020 Tropenbos Indonesia Citation : Purwanto E, 2020. Tenurial Problems in Protection Forest and Grand Forest Park Area. Tropenbos Indonesia. Bogor Author : Dr. Edi Purwanto Cover photo : Tropenbos Indonesia Available in : Tropenbos Indonesia Taman Cimanggu, Jl. Akasia I Blok PI/6 Tanah Sareal, Bogor, Indonesia, 16163 Tlp : +62 251 8316156 e-mail : [email protected] www.tropenbos-indonesia.org TENURIAL PROBLEMS IN PROTECTION FOREST AND GRAND FOREST PARK AREA EDI PURWANTO Content Content iv Eksekutif Summary v 1. Introduction 1 2. Field Evidence 4 2.1. Tahura Nipa-Nipa 4 2.2. Tahura Bukit Soeharto 5 2.3. Tahura Sultan Thaha Saifuddin 6 2.4. Tahura Pocut Meurah Intan 7 2.5. Sungai Wain Protection Forest 8 2.6. Meratus Mountain Protection Forest 9 2.7. Gunung Tarak Protection Forest 10 2.8. Sungai Lesan Protection Forest 11 2.9. Smart practice : HKm in Register 39 Agung Utara City Protection Forest 13 and conflict management in Register 45B Bukit Rigis Protection Forest, Lampung Province 3. Tenurial Problems in Protection Forest and Grand Forest Park Area 20 4. Future Agenda 24 References 26 iv Eksekutif Summary The problems of Protection Forest (Hutan Lindung – HL) (29,67 millions ha) are very critical and have been in open access condition. The same problems also happening in 22 Grand Forest Park (Taman Hutan Rakyat – Tahura) in several provinces (0,36 millions ha).
    [Show full text]
  • Balikpapan City
    Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Classification of security quality level using Fuzzy Logic study case: Balikpapan City To cite this article: Naufal Fathurahmah et al 2021 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1821 012043 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 170.106.34.90 on 24/09/2021 at 17:44 ICOMPAC 2020 IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1821 (2021) 012043 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1821/1/012043 Classification of security quality level using Fuzzy Logic study case: Balikpapan City Naufal Fathurahmah1, Sigit Pancahayani1,*, Abrari Noor Hasmi1, and Bima Prihasto2 1Department of Mathematics, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Balikpapan, Indonesia 2Department of Informatics, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Balikpapan, Indonesia *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. A liveable city is a city with a comfortable environment that gives its residents a sense of perfection to live and ease to do various activities. Balikpapan is one of major cities whose has the third-largest population in the province of East Kalimantan consisting of 6 districts namely, South Balikpapan, East Balikpapan, North Balikpapan, West Balikpapan, Central Balikpapan, and Balikpapan City. The consequence that arises from the large population is the increase in crime that affects the liveability in terms of security quality. In this study, Mamdani Fuzzy Logic is used to investigate the level of security quality of each sub- district in this city based on the crime figures. Moreover, the types of criminalities are categorized into four kinds, namely fraud, theft, immoral violence, and other crimes. Based on the result, it was found that the order of sub-districts with the best level of security is Central Balikpapan which is followed by Northern and Eastern Balikpapan with fairly good security status.
    [Show full text]
  • Bersihkanindonesia 1
    #BERSIHKANINDONESIA 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There is also one coal power plant in the third ring Panca Pesona, and PT. Panca Arta Mulia Serasi. THE OLIGARCHY AND of the new capital city region. The plant received its These companies are owned by the Novanto family RESPONSIBILITY ANNULMENT permit for construction under the banner of PT. Indo and is located in the second ring of IKN. Ridlatama Power (PT. IRP), located in Muara Jawa 1 The name of also appears On August 26th 2019 , President Joko Widodo Indonesia Hutani Manunggal (PT. IHM). district, of Kutai Kartanegara Regency. Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan in this report. This coal mining company owner is announced the relocation of the capital city from The central core of the government is located fully are spread throughout the related to this case through PT. Toba Group, which DKI Jakarta to East Kalimantan. Jokowi announced inside the concession owned by PT. IHM, while the 94 former mining pits IKN area. Most of the pits came from the operations has subsidiary companies of PT. Adimitra Baratama that the relocation is a mega project that would second ring that is 42.000 hectares wide covers the of five companies: PT. Singlurus Pratama (22 pits), PT. Nusantara, PT. Trisensa Mineral Utama, PT. Kutai take place in the regencies of Penajam Paser Utara concession owned by both PT. IHM and PT. IKU. (PPU) and Kutai Kartanegara. The new area for the Perdana Maju Utama (16 pits), CV. Hardiyatul Isyal Energi, PT. Indomining and a palm oil company PT. capital city is approximately 133.321 hectares.
    [Show full text]
  • Ibu Kota Baru for a New Indonesia. an Analysis of the Project of the New Indonesian Capital Through Government Tweets
    Ibu Kota Baru for a new Indonesia. An Analysis of the Project of the New Indonesian Capital through Government Tweets Student: Giulia Frigo Student Number: s2110857 Supervisor: Dr David Henley Second Reader: Dr Rizal Shidiq i Research Master in Asian Studies Words: 30724 Faculty of Humanities Date: April 28, 2020 Declaration I hereby declare that the content of this thesis is my original work, it has been written by me, and it has not been submitted for any degree at university previously. I have acknowledged all the sources of information used for the thesis. Giulia Frigo 28.04.2020 ii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I sincerely thank my supervisor, Dr David Henley, for giving me a huge boost in writing this thesis and for the time he devoted to me. Thank you for keeping me feeling motivated and engaged. I am also grateful to Dr Florian Schneider, for helpful suggestions and clarifications about the methodology to use. Thank you to Leiden University and all the staff I had the pleasure to meet and learn from during this two-year Master. It has been an intense and rewarding experience. Finally, I would like to thank my friends, close and distant, who contributed to serenity during the research and writing process and shared their insights and opinions about my thesis. Last but not least, I sincerely thank Sebastiano, who always supported me and stood by my side in the good and bad times. Thank you to my family, especially to my mum and dad, who have always been with me. Cover Photos: courtesy of Adrian Pranata (Jakarta, on the top) and Chris Abney (area covered with green-leafed plant, on the bottom), both retrieved from Unsplash High-Resolution Photo.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidating Sustainability 2016 Sustainability Report
    Consolidating Sustainability 2016 Sustainability Report In Papua, lives were lost. Local mountain dwellers, who were persuaded to stop using pork fat to coat their skin and to cleanse themselves with soap instead, experienced increased mortality rates. It turned out that the pork fat, perceived by outsiders as unhygienic, had protected them from the elements and from infection with Malaria that is carried by mosquitoes. Experience teaches that good intentions can go badly awry if assumptions are made without understanding the views and needs of others, cultural diversity, and differences in customs, as well as ways of living. Thorough consideration must be taken of diversity in any attempt at assistance, and that communities must be consulted on what they need. SOKOLA Institute SOKOLA is a not-for-profit organisation providing education for remote indigenous peoples who are unable to access formal education due to geographic and cultural obstacles. The education is aimed at providing the skills required to manage the many problems that indigenous and marginalised communities face due to the increasing pressures from the outside world. Founded in 2003 by Saur Marlina “Butet” Manurung and other four fellows, SOKOLA is an excellent example of how a small number of individuals with strong passion and determination can effect real change. Indika Energy is honoured to have been supporting SOKOLA and its literacy programs. Consolidating Sustainability 2016 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 6 // Consolidating Sustainability // Sustainability is Core to Company’s Business Indika Energy, Indonesia’s leading integrated energy company, provides adequate amounts of safe energy to the public with the understanding that energy is fundamental to human well- being and economic development that enables job creation, greater income equity, and social solidarity.
    [Show full text]
  • OPTIMALISASI SINERGI SYNERGY OPTIMIZATION PT PETROSEA TBK Laporan Keberlanjutan 2013 Sustainability Report 2013 PT PETROSEA TBK
    LAPORAN KEBERLANJUTAN SUSTAINABILITY REPORT OPTIMALISASI SINERGI SYNERGY OPTIMIZATION PT PETROSEA TBK Laporan Keberlanjutan 2013 Sustainability Report 2013 PT PETROSEA TBK DAFTAR ISI TABLE OF CONTENTS TENTANG LAPORAN INI UPAYA RAMAH LINGKUNGAN 02 ABOUT THIS REPORT 54 ENVIRONMENT FRIENDLY EFFORTS PESAN PRESIDEN DUKUNGAN DAN KONTRIBUSI DIREKTUR PENGEMBANGAN KOMUNITAS MESSAGE FROM SUPPORT AND CONTRIBUTION FOR 04 THE PRESIDENT DIRECTOR 64 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TENTANG PETROSEA KONTRIBUSI EKONOMI KETERANGAN SAMPUL ABOUT PETROSEA ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTIONS Melalui optimalisasi sinergi antara tiga pilar bisnis (Mining, Engineering 08 74 & Project Management dan Petrosea Offshore Supply Base) dengan kegiatan CSR (Kesehatan, Pendidikan, Pemberdayaan Ekonomi dan Lingkungan), Petrosea melanjutkan komitmennya untuk berperan aktif membangun PENDEKATAN lingkungan dan masyarakat di sekitar daerah operasionalnya. INDEKS GRI KEBERLANJUTAN GRI INDEX SUSTAINABLE APPROACH COVER NOTE 24 77 Through synergy optimization between its three business pillars (Mining, Engineering & Project Management and Petrosea Offshore Supply Base), and its CSR activities (Health, Education, Economic Empowerment and KESELAMATAN, KESEHATAN Environment), Petrosea continues its commitment to proactively develop KERJA DAN LINGKUNGAN (K3L) the environment and society surrounding its operational areas. 40 HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT (HSE) b PT PETROSEA TBK Laporan Keberlanjutan 2013 Sustainability Report 2013 PT PETROSEA TBK Tentang LAPORAN INI ABOUT THIS Report Dokumen ini merupakan
    [Show full text]
  • Forging Resilience LONTAR PALM LEAF AS SYMBOL
    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2013 FORGING RESILIENCE LONTAR PALM LEAF AS SYMBOL The lontar palm trees are referred as the tree of life since all of its parts are useful in various facets of life. Stories of the historical civilization of the archipelago are written on the lontar palm leaves. The strength of lontar palm leaves symbolize as the guardian of culture and civilization. While the flexibility of lontar palm leaves symbolize as a container to accommodate the knowledge”. 2013 FORGING RESILIENCE PT Indika Energy Tbk. PRESIDENT DIRECTor’S MessAGE (G4-1) PRESIDENT DIRECTOR’S MEssAGE (G4-1) Wishnu Wardhana President Director & Group CEO Our programs are created for the Indonesian people with the objective of educating and instilling them with the culture of their homeland and values toward integrity, while enabling them to create a healthier way of life. 6 DEAR STAKEHOLDERS, Throughout 2013, Indika Energy has carried Despite the increase in revenues, taking out efforts to strengthen the resilience into account the recognition of one-off in responding to two most pressing exceptional charges of US$63.3 million challenges, the decline in thermal coal (of which US$27.8 million are non-cash prices and the higher oil price, which charges), Indika Energy reported Loss impacted Indika Energy’s financial results Attributable to Owners of the Company of significantly. In 2013, Indika Energy’s Total US$62.5 million. Revenues increased by 15.2% to US$863.4 million, mainly contributed from Tripatra’s Responding to the prolonged coal business engineering, procurement and construction downturn, Indika Energy continued to (EPC) projects.
    [Show full text]