DOCSLIB.ORG

Uganda-Roads-And-Bridges-In-The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uganda-Roads-And-Bridges-In-The FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No: PAD3682 Public Disclosure Authorized INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED GRANT Public Disclosure Authorized IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 92.7 MILLION (US$130.8 MILLION EQUIVALENT) OF WHICH SDR 77.2 MILLION (US$109 MILLION EQUIVALENT) FROM THE WINDOW FOR HOST COMMUNITIES AND REFUGEES TO THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA Public Disclosure Authorized FOR THE ROADS AND BRIDGES IN THE REFUGEE HOSTING DISTRICTS / KOBOKO-YUMBE-MOYO ROAD CORRIDOR PROJECT SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 Transport Global Practice Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective July 31, 2020) Currency Unit = Ugandan Shillings (UGX) UGX3687 = US$1 US$1 = SDR 0.70767903 FISCAL YEAR July 1 - June 30 Regional Vice President: Hafez M. H. Ghanem Acting Country Director: Camille Anne Nuamah Regional Director: Riccardo Puliti Practice Manager: Benedict L.J. Eijbergen Task Team Leader(s): Pratap Tvgssshrk, Ivan Emmanuel Mwondha ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AfDB African Development Bank ARSDP Albertine Region Sustainable Development Project CERC Contingent Emergency Response Component CFR Central Forest Reserve CoC Code of Conduct COVID -19 Corona Virus Disease CPF Country Partnership Framework CRRF Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework CSC Construction Supervision Consultant CSO Civil Society Organization DA Designated Account DESS Department of Environmental and Social Safeguards DRC Democratic Republic of Congo DRDIP Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project DSC District Security Committee EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return ERW Explosive Remains of War ESCP Environmental and Social Commitment Plan ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan ESF Environment and Social Framework EU European Union E&S Environmental and Social FCV Fragile Conflict Violence FDI Foreign Direct Investment GBV Gender Based Violence GDP Gross Domestic Product GoU Government of Uganda GMC Grievance Management Committee GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism GRS Grievance Management System IED Improvised Explosive Devices IFR Interim Financial Report IPV Intimate Partner Violence JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency Km Kilometer KYM Koboko-Yumbe-Moyo LIC Low Income Country LMP Labor Management Plan MFD Maximizing Finance for Development MoFPED Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development MoGLSD Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development MoLG Ministry of Local Government MoLHUD Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development MoWT Ministry of Works and Transport NDP National Development Plan NEMA National Environmental Management Agency NERAMP Northeastern Road Corridor Asset Management Project NGO Non-Governmental Organization NR National Road NSP Nominated Service Provider OPM Office of the Prime Minister PAP Project Affected Person PDU Procurement and Disposal Unit PIU Project Implementation Unit PPSD Project Procurement Strategy Document PSC Project Steering Committee PSI Project Safety Impact RAMS Road Asset Management System RAP Resettlement Action Plan ReHOPE Refugee and Host Population Empowerment ROW Right of Way RSW Sub-Window for Refugees and Host Communities RSSAT Road Safety Screening and Analysis Tool SEA Sexual Exploitation and Abuse SEP Stakeholder Engagement Plan SH Sexual Harassment SIDA Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency SOP Standard Operating Procedures SPD Standard Procurement Document STA Settlement Transformation Agenda STEP Systematic Tracking of Exchanges in Procurement TAC Third-party Audit Consultant TOR Terms of Reference TSDP Transport Sector Development Project UDHS Uganda Demographic and Health Survey UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNRA Uganda National Roads Authority UPDF Uganda Peoples’ Defense Forces URF Uganda Road Fund USAID United States Agency for International Development US$ United States Dollar UXO Unexploded Ordinances VAC Violence Against Children WHO World Health Organization WHR Window for Host Communities and Refugees The World Bank Uganda: Roads and Bridges in the Refugee Hosting Districts Project (P171339) TABLE OF CONTENTS DATASHEET ........................................................................................................................... 1 I. STRATEGIC CONTEXT ...................................................................................................... 7 A. Country Context................................................................................................................................ 7 B. Sectoral and Institutional Context .................................................................................................. 12 C. Relevance to Higher Level Objectives ............................................................................................. 16 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 20 A. Project Development Objective ..................................................................................................... 20 B. Project Components ....................................................................................................................... 21 C. Project Beneficiaries ....................................................................................................................... 30 D. Results Chain .................................................................................................................................. 30 E. Rationale for Bank Involvement and Role of Partners ................................................................... 31 F. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design .................................................................... 32 III. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ............................................................................ 33 A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements .......................................................................... 33 B. Results Monitoring and Evaluation Arrangements......................................................................... 34 C. Sustainability ................................................................................................................................... 35 IV. PROJECT APPRAISAL SUMMARY ................................................................................... 36 A. Technical, Economic and Financial Analysis ................................................................................... 36 B. Fiduciary .......................................................................................................................................... 37 C. Legal Operational Policies ............................................................................................................... 41 D. Environmental and Social ............................................................................................................... 41 V. GRIEVANCE REDRESS SERVICES ..................................................................................... 47 VI. KEY RISKS ..................................................................................................................... 47 VII. RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING ................................................................... 51 ANNEX 1: Implementation Arrangements and Support Plan .......................................... 59 ANNEX 2: Project Climate Co-Benefits ........................................................................... 71 ANNEX 3: Project Location Map .................................................................................... 80 The World Bank Uganda: Roads and Bridges in the Refugee Hosting Districts Project (P171339) DATASHEET BASIC INFORMATION BASIC_INFO_TABLE Country(ies) Project Name Uganda: Roads and Bridges in the Refugee Hosting Districts/Koboko-Yumbe-Moyo Road Uganda Corridor Project Project ID Financing Instrument Environmental and Social Risk Classification Investment Project P171339 High Financing Financing & Implementation Modalities [ ] Multiphase Programmatic Approach (MPA) [✓] Contingent Emergency Response Component (CERC) [ ] Series of Projects (SOP) [ ] Fragile State(s) [ ] Performance-Based Conditions (PBCs) [ ] Small State(s) [ ] Financial Intermediaries (FI) [✓] Fragile within a non-fragile Country [ ] Project-Based Guarantee [ ] Conflict [ ] Deferred Drawdown [✓] Responding to Natural or Man-made Disaster [ ] Alternate Procurement Arrangements (APA) [ ] Hands-on Enhanced Implementation Support (HEIS) Expected Approval Date Expected Closing Date 10-Sep-2020 31-Dec-2025 Bank/IFC Collaboration No Proposed Development Objective(s) The Project Development Objectives are to enhance: (a) road transport connectivity in select refugee hosting districts of Uganda; and (b) the capacity of Uganda National Roads Authority to manage environmental, social and road safety risks. Page 1 of 80 The World Bank Uganda: Roads and Bridges in the Refugee Hosting Districts Project (P171339) Components Component Name Cost (US$, millions) Road Upgrading Works 145.80 Institutional Strengthening 3.00 Road Safety 2.00 Contingency Emergency Response 0.00 Organizations Borrower: Republic of Uganda Implementing Agency: Uganda National Roads Authority PROJECT FINANCING
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uganda National a Uganda National Roads Authority
    Rethinking the Big Picture of UNRA’s Business ROADS AUTHORITY(UNRA) UGANDA NATIONAL JUNE 2012 2012/13 – 2016/17 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Content Page Section Content Page 11 SWOT Analysis 1 Message from the UNRA 03 21 Chairperson & Board 2 Message from the Executive 04 12 PEST Analysis Director 27 3 Background 05 13 Critical Success Factors 29 4 Introduction 08 14 Business Context 31 5 UNRA Strategy Translation 11 Process 15 Grand Strategy 36 6 UNRA Va lue Cha in 12 16 Grand Strategy Map 37 7 Mission Statement 13 17 Goals and Strategies 8 Corporate Values 14 39 18 Implementing and 9 Assumptions 15 Monitoring the Plan 51 10 Vision Statement 19 19 Programme of Key Road Development Activities 53 2 SECTION 1. Message from the Chairperson Dear Staff at UNRA, In return, the Board will expect higher It is with great privilege and honour that I write to performance and greater accountability from thank you for your participation in the defining for Management and staff. Everyone must play his the firs t time the Stra teg ic Direc tion UNRA will t ak e role in delivering on the goals set in this over the coming 5 years. On behalf of the UNRA strategic plan. The proposed performance Board of Directors, I salute you for this noble effort. measurement framework will provide a vital tool for assessing progress towards to achievement The Strategic Plan outlines a number of strategic of the set targets. options including facilitating primary growth sectors (agriculture, industry, mining and tourism), Let me take this opportunity to appeal to improving the road condition, providing safe roads everyone to support the ED in implementing this and ensuring value for money.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Rapid Response Conflict-Related Displacement
    RESIDENT / HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS UGANDA RAPID RESPONSE CONFLICT-RELATED DISPLACEMENT RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR Ms. Ahunna Eziakonwa - Onochie REPORTING PROCESS AND CONSULTATION SUMMARY a. Please indicate when the After Action Review (AAR) was conducted and who participated. CERF agencies participated to review the achievements of the second CERF Rapid Response allocation of 2014 and the lessons learnt on 11 September 2015. The Lessons Learnt was then presented to the UNCT on 14 September 2015. The report was finalized based on UNCT feed-back. b. Please confirm that the Resident Coordinator and/or Humanitarian Coordinator (RC/HC) Report was discussed in the Humanitarian and/or UN Country Team and by cluster/sector coordinators as outlined in the guidelines. YES NO CERF agencies participated to review the achievements of the second CERF Rapid Response allocation of 2014 and the lessons learnt on 11 September 2015. The Lessons Learnt was then presented to the UNCT on 14 September 2015. The report was finalized based on UNCT feed-back. c. Was the final version of the RC/HC Report shared for review with in-country stakeholders as recommended in the guidelines (i.e. the CERF recipient agencies and their implementing partners, cluster/sector coordinators and members and relevant government counterparts)? YES NO The final CERF report was shared with the CERF recipient agencies. 2 I. HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT TABLE 1: EMERGENCY ALLOCATION OVERVIEW (US$) Total amount required for the humanitarian response:
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Settled Refugees and the Impact on Service Delivery in Koboko
    Self-Settled Refugees and the Impact on Service Delivery in Koboko Municipal Council Empowering Refugee Hosting Districts in Uganda: Making the Nexus Work II2 Empowering Refugee Hosting Districts in Uganda: Making the Nexus Work Foreword This report ‘Self-Settled Refugees and the Impact on Service Delivery in Koboko Municipal Council’ comes in a time when local governments in Uganda are grappling with the effects of refugees who have moved and settled in urban areas. As a country we have been very welcoming to our brothers and sisters who have been seeking refuge and we are proud to say that we have been able to assist the ones in need. Nonetheless, we cannot deny that refugees have been moving out of the gazetted settlements and into the urban areas, which has translated into increasing demands on the limited social amenities and compromises the quality of life for both refugees and host communities, this whilst the number of self-settled refugees continues to grow. This report aims to address the effects the presence self-settled refugees have on urban areas and the shortfalls local governments face in critical service delivery areas like education, health, water, livelihoods and the protection of self-settled refugees if not properly catered for. So far, it has been difficult for the local governments to substantiate such cases in the absence of reliable data. We are therefore very pleased to finally have a reference document, which addresses the unnoticed and yet enormous challenges faced by urban authorities hosting refugees, such as Koboko Municipal Council. This document provides us with more accurate and reliable data, which will better inform our planning, and enhances our capacity to deliver more inclusive services.
    [Show full text]
  • MOYO DISTRICT Family Planning - Costed Implementation Plan 2018/19 - 2022/23
    REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MOYO DISTRICT Family Planning - Costed Implementation Plan 2018/19 - 2022/23 OCTOBER 2018 MOYO DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT This District Family Planning Costed Implementation Plan has been made possible with the technical support from the Ministry of Health and the United Nations Population Fund through Moyo District Health Office. This project was funded under the UNFPA Supplies Programme and UK aid from the UK government. Published by: Moyo District Local Government Ownership: Reproduction of this plan for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without permission from the Moyo District Local Government, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Preferred Citation: Moyo District (2018). District Family Planning Costed Implementation Plan, 2018/19-2022/23. Moyo, Uganda Copies available from: Moyo District Health Office iv Table of Contents List of Tables vi List of Figures vi FOREWORD vii PREFACE viii ACKNOWLEDGMENT ix ACRONYMS x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY xi SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 2 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Background 3 1.3 SWOT Analysis for Family Planning Services 11 1.4 Process of Developing the District CIP 12 SECTION TWO: THE CASE FOR MOYO DISTRICT FP 13 COSTED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2.1 Introduction 14 2.2 Demand Creation 14 2.3 Service Delivery and Access 15 2.4 Contraceptive Security 17 2.5 Policy and Enabling Environment 17 2.6 Financing 17 2.7 Stewardship, Management and Accountability 18 SECTION THREE: DISTRICT STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 19 3.1 Introduction 20 3.2 Vision, Mission, Core Values
    [Show full text]
  • Rcdf Projects in Yumbe District, Uganda
    Rural Communications Development Fund (RCDF) RCDF PROJECTS IN YUMBE DISTRICT, UGANDA MAP O F YU M B E SH O W IN G S UB C O U NT IE S N Midigo Kei Apo R omo gi Yum be TC Kuru D rajani Od ravu 3 0 3 6 Km s UCC Support through the RCDF Programme Uganda Communications Commission Plot 42 -44, Spring road, Bugolobi P.O. Box 7376 Kampala, Uganda Tel: + 256 414 339000/ 312 339000 Fax: + 256 414 348832 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ucc.co.ug 1 Table of Contents 1- Foreword……………………………………………………………….……….………..…..…....….…3 2- Background…………………………………….………………………..…………..….….……………4 3- Introduction………………….……………………………………..…….…………….….…………...4 4- Project profiles……………………………………………………………………….…..…….……...5 5- Stakeholders’ responsibilities………………………………………………….….…........…12 6- Contacts………………..…………………………………………….…………………..…….……….13 List of tables and maps 1- Table showing number of RCDF projects in Yumbe district………….………..….5 2- Map of Uganda showing Yumbe district………..………………….………...………….14 10- Map of Yumbe district showing sub counties………..……………………………….15 11- Table showing the population of Yumbe district by sub counties……..…...15 12- List of RCDF Projects in Yumbe district…………………………………….………...…16 Abbreviations/Acronyms UCC Uganda Communications Commission RCDF Rural Communications Development Fund USF Universal Service Fund MCT Multipurpose Community Tele-centre PPDA Public Procurement and Disposal Act of 2003 POP Internet Points of Presence ICT Information and Communications Technology UA Universal Access MoES Ministry of Education and Sports MoH Ministry of Health DHO District Health Officer CAO Chief Administrative Officer RDC Resident District Commissioner 2 1. Foreword ICTs are a key factor for socio-economic development. It is therefore vital that ICTs are made accessible to all people so as to make those people have an opportunity to contribute and benefit from the socio-economic development that ICTs create.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development Rural Electrification Agency ENERGY FOR RURAL TRANSFORMATION PHASE III GRID INTENSIFICATION SCHEMES PACKAGED UNDER WEST NILE, NORTH NORTH WEST, AND NORTHERN SERVICE TERRITORIES Public Disclosure Authorized JUNE, 2019 i LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CDO Community Development Officer CFP Chance Finds Procedure DEO District Environment Officer ESMP Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Plan ESMF Environmental Social Management Framework ERT III Energy for Rural Transformation (Phase 3) EHS Environmental Health and Safety EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ESMMP Environmental and Social Mitigation and Management Plan GPS Global Positioning System GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism MEMD Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development NEMA National Environment Management Authority OPD Out Patient Department OSH Occupational Safety and Health PCR Physical Cultural Resources PCU Project Coordination Unit PPE Personal Protective Equipment REA Rural Electrification Agency RoW Right of Way UEDCL Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited WENRECO West Nile Rural Electrification Company ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ......................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Finance Pages New.Indd
    x NEW VISION, Wednesday, August 1, 2012 ADVERT MINISTRY OF FINANCE, PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FIRST QUARTER (JULY - SEPTEMBER 2012) USE CAPITATION RELEASE BY SCHOOL BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT VOTES FOR FY 2012/13 (USHS 000) THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA District School Name Account Title A/C No. Bank Branch Quarter 1 Release District School Name Account Title A/C No. Bank Branch Quarter 1 Release S/N Vote Code S/N Vote Code 9 562 KIRUHURA KAARO HIGH SCHOOL KAARO HIGH SCHOOL 0140053299301 Stanbic Bank Uganda MBARARA 9,020,000 4 571 BUDAKA NGOMA STANDARD SCH. NGOMA STANDARD SCH. 0140047863601 Stanbic Bank Uganda PALLISA 36,801,000 10 562 KIRUHURA KIKATSI SEED SECOND- KIKATSI SEED SECONDARY 95050200000573 Bank Of Baroda MBARARA 7,995,000 5 571 BUDAKA KADERUNA S.S KADERUNA S.S 0140047146701 Stanbic Bank Uganda PALLISA 21,311,000 ARY SCHOOL SCHOOL 6 571 BUDAKA KAMERUKA SEED KAMERUKA SEED SECOND- 3112300002 Centenary Bank MBALE 10,291,000 11 562 KIRUHURA KINONI COMMUNITY HIGH KINONI COMMUNITY HIGH 1025140340474 Equity Bank RUSHERE 17,813,000 SECONDARY SCHOOL ARY SCHOOL SCHOOL SCHOOL 7 571 BUDAKA LYAMA S.S LYAMA SEN.SEC.SCH. 3110600893 Centenary Bank MBALE 11,726,000 12 562 KIRUHURA SANGA SEN SEC SCHOOL SANGA SEC SCHOOL 5010381271 Centenary Bank MBARARA 11,931,000 8 571 BUDAKA NABOA S.S.S NABOA S.S.S 0140047144501 Stanbic Bank Uganda PALLISA 20,362,000 Total 221,620,000 9 571 BUDAKA IKI IKI S.S IKI-IKI S.S 0140047145501 Stanbic Bank Uganda PALLISA 40,142,000 - 10 571 BUDAKA IKI IKI HIGH SCHOOL IKI IKI HIGH SCHOOL 01113500194316 Dfcu Bank MBALE 23,171,000
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Regional Reconciliation in Northern Uganda
    Mapping Regional Reconciliation in Northern Uganda: A Case Study of the Acholi and Lango Sub-Regions Shilpi Shabdita Okwir Isaac Odiya Mapping Regional Reconciliation in Northern Uganda © 2015, Justice and Reconciliation Project, Gulu, Uganda All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of this publication should be made to: Justice and Reconciliation Project Plot 50 Lower Churchill Drive, Laroo Division P.O. Box 1216 Gulu, Uganda, East Africa [email protected] Layout by Lindsay McClain Opiyo Front cover photo by Shilpi Shabdita Printed by the Justice and Reconciliation Project, Gulu, Uganda This publication was supported by a grant from USAID SAFE Program. However, the opinions and viewpoints in the report is not that of USAID SAFE Program. ii Justice and Reconciliation Project Acknowledgements This report was made possible with a grant from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Supporting Access to Justice, Fostering Equity and Peace (SAFE) Program for the initiation of the year-long project titled, “Across Ethnic Boundaries: Promoting Regional Reconciliation in Acholi and Lango Sub-Regions,” for which the Justice and Reconciliation Project (JRP) gratefully acknowledges their support. We are deeply indebted to Boniface Ojok, Head of Office at JRP, for his inspirational leadership and sustained guidance in this initiative. Special thanks to the enumerators Abalo Joyce, Acan Grace, Nyeko Simon, Ojimo Tycoon, Akello Paska Oryema and Adur Patritia Julu for working tirelessly to administer the opinion survey and to collect data, which has formed the blueprint of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Project for Community Development for Promoting Return and Resettlement of Idp in Northern Uganda
    OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER AMURU DISTRICT/ NWOYA DISTRICT THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA THE PROJECT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR PROMOTING RETURN AND RESETTLEMENT OF IDP IN NORTHERN UGANDA FINAL REPORT MARCH 2011 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY NTC INTERNATINAL CO., LTD. EID JR 11-048 Uganda Amuru Location Map of Amuru and Nwoya Districts Location Map of the Target Sites PHOTOs Urgent Pilot Project Amuru District: Multipurpose Hall Outside View Inside View Handing over Ceremony (December 21 2010) Amuru District: Water Supply System Installation of Solar Panel Water Storage facility (For solar powered submersible pump) (30,000lt water tank) i Amuru District: Staff house Staff House Local Dance Team at Handing over Ceremony (1 Block has 2 units) (October 27 2010) Pabbo Sub County: Public Hall Outside view of public hall Handing over Ceremony (December 14 2010) ii Pab Sub County: Staff house Staff House Outside View of Staff House (1 Block has 2 units) (4 Block) Pab Sub County: Water Supply System Installed Solar Panel and Pump House Training on the operation of the system Water Storage Facility Public Tap Stand (40,000lt water tank) (5 stands; 4tap per stand) iii Pilot Project Pilot Project in Pabbo Sub-County Type A model: Improvement of Technical School Project Joint inspection with District Engineer & Outside view of the Workshop District Education Officer Type B Model: Pukwany Village Improvement of Access Road Project River Crossing After the Project Before the Project (No crossing facilities) (Pipe Culver) Road Rehabilitation Before
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed System Security Assessment in West Nile Sub Region (Uganda)
    Seed System Security Assessment in West Nile Sub region April 2015 Integrated Seed Sector Development Programme Uganda Seed System Security Assessment in West Nile Sub-region Integrated Seed Sector Development Programme In Uganda Recommended referencing: ISSD Uganda, 2015. Seed System Security Assessment in West Nile Sub-region. Integrated Seed Sector Development Programme in Uganda, Wageningen UR Uganda. Kampala Participating partners: FAO (Nairobi), Danish Refugee Council, ZOA, NilePro Trust Limited and Local Governments of Arua, Koboko, Adjumani and Moyo District TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS.............................................................................................. i ACKOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................................... ii THE ASSESSMENT TEAM ..................................................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................... iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE SEED SECURITY ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Atiak Massacre
    THE JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION PROJECT: FIELD NOTES Liu Institute for Global Issues and the Gulu District NGO Forum Field Notes, No. 4, April 2007 Remembering the Atiak Massacre April 20th 1995 All of us live as if our bodies do not have Twelve years later, the wounds of the souls. If you think of the massacre and the massacre have far from healed. As the children we have been left with, you feel so survivor’s testimony at the beginning of this bad.1 report puts it, “all of us live as if our bodies do not have souls.” Despite the massacre INTRODUCTION being one of the largest and by reputation most notorious in the twenty-one year On April 20th 1995, the Lord’s Resistance history of the conflict, no official record, Army (LRA) entered the trading centre of investigation or acknowledgement of events Atiak and after an intense offensive, exists. No excavation of the mass grave has defeated the Ugandan army stationed there. been conducted and therefore the exact Hundreds of men, women, students and number of persons killed is not known. young children were then rounded up by the Survivors literally live with the remains of LRA and marched a short distance into the bullet fragments inside them. Although the bush until they reached a river. There, they massacre site is only a few kilometres from were separated into two groups according to the trading centre, a proper burial of those their sex and age. After being lectured for slaughtered 12 years ago is not complete: as their alleged collaboration with the one survivor reminds us, “the bodies of Government, the LRA commander in charge some people were never brought back home, ordered his soldiers to open fire three times because there were no relatives to carry on a group of about 300 civilian men and them home.” boys as women and young children witnessed the horror.
    [Show full text]