DOCSLIB.ORG

October /November 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
October /November 2006 Washington Rail News October /November 2006 www.washarp.org [email protected] Publication of the Washington Association of Rail Passengers A NotNot----forforforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." Amtrak has new president but still no final Changes coming to 2007 federal funding or reauthorization WashARP By Chuck Mott The Amtrak Board of Directors has we need to know whether he was The WashARP Board of Directors appointed Alexander Kummant as brought in to build up Amtrak or tear it approved major changes in the struc- president and CEO. He started Sept. down. We await what he’ll have to say ture of our organization on July 28, 12. Kummant replaced interim presi- about Amtrak’s future.” Sen. Tom 2006, that are expected to facilitate and dent David Hughes, who had filled in Carper (D-DE) said Kummant’s hiring strengthen the purpose, focus and ef- for the highly regarded David Gunn, “should help Amtrak to better work with fectiveness of our rail advocacy organi- fired by the board last November. its partners in the freight rail business.” zation. Chief among the changes made "Alex Kummant has the outstanding Kummant spoke publicly for the first is our name change to All Aboard credentials and experience to lead a time Sept. 28 at a House Transporta- Washington . Reasons for the new changing Amtrak that is more tion and Infrastructure Committee name include: customer-focused and fiscally respon- hearing. His brief opening statement • It is a progressive term sible," said Amtrak Chairman David M. included this: “I believe long-distance • It suggests forward movement to Laney. "His appointment fulfills the trains are an important part of the na- something that is excitingly board's commitment to select an ex- tion’s transportation network, and I be- different traordinarily strong and capable leader lieve it is our challenge to run them in • It anticipates new experiences for Amtrak's future, building on the the most efficient and effective way. and outcomes growing national desire for more and That said, I understand how important • It unmistakably identifies passen- improved passenger rail service." these trains are as a form of basic ger trains as the means in getting Little was know of Kummant by transportation to many small communi- us there most people. He served as a Union ties across the nation.” NARP’s Ross The board also adopted this mission Pacific vice president 1999-2003. His Capon said, “We will be watching with statement: “Promoting rail as an inte- other employment involved a number of interest to see how he defines ‘efficient gral part of Washington State’s trans- companies in the U.S. and Europe, and effective.’” portation solutions.” Most organizations sometimes for less than a year. Some He also said corridor expansion and today, both for-profit and non-profit, members of Congress and rail advo- continued development of state part- have adopted a mission statement, cates want to know in what direction he nerships are important to Amtrak’s which says, in a few well-chosen will take Amtrak. future. words, what the organization is about. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) told Kummant said he's always won- We believe this mission statement pro- the Wall Street Journal, “It’s good they dered "why the Amtrak debate is so vides an excellent description of who finally appointed someone, but given emotional and at times acrimonious.” we are and what we want to accom- this administration’s record on Amtrak, (See Kummant, page 5) plish. A special thanks goes to Brandon Swalley and her committee for their UP failures much higher up than with the dispatchers By Mark Meyer thorough research and analysis in In the August/September WashARP newsletter, Jim Hamre pens a lengthy tale of finding a suitable name and mission how the Coast Starlight has become a victim of Union Pacific operating practices. statement for our rail advocacy “Union Pacific – lessons in how not to run a railroad” includes a thorough documen- organization. tation of some of the delays he experienced during a roundtrip on the Starlight in The board also reviewed a draft of June of this year. Unfortunately, his frustration with the constant, growing delays our proposed Washington State Rail these trains experienced caused him make some statements that question the com- Policy document. The final statement petence of the train dispatchers rather than to focus on the main culprit: UP was to be submitted to the board of di- management. rectors at its meeting on October 14 for One example he experienced is indicated as such: “One mile north of Salinas sta- final review and approval. This impor- tion we parked in a siding for more than a(n) hour to await passage of the northbound tant document will serve as All Aboard Starlight . We could have proceeded to the Salinas station and continued on our way Washington’s official rail policy state- to meet the northbound train at a siding south of town. No freight trains were evident ment for our state. On behalf of the in this area.” There are several similar descriptions about delays such as this using board; I want to thank C.B. Hall and the phrases “we could have” done this or “there is no reason we could have not” done that. Lloyd Flem for their tireless and (See Meyer, page 4) (See Changes, page 5) page 2 ceived benefits? Repeatedly, I heard, case of the Higher Users Federation (a FroFroFro m the "comfort, safety, lack of stress, very re- powerful highway BUILDERS lobby) for Executive laxing, pleasurable experience, better an ultra-costly massive new round of Director's Desk scenery, cordial fellow travelers, produc- road construction. The article begins with tive use of time, best way for seniors or probably accurate estimates of the costs by non-drivers." Speedier travel time and/or in time and money of current traffic con- Lloyd H. Flem cheap rides were rarely, if ever, men- gestion. The total proposed answer: more tioned by my respondents. (Although for and bigger roads! In considering "what Benefits of Passenger Rail; me, the train fare Olympia-Seattle- we all can do," the article's only hint of Olympia is certainly less than the cost of Rail is Also an Answer! action beyond more pavement is "mem- driving and parking downtown, which is bership rent-a-car." Transit, rail (for pas- The Washington State Transportation my usual destination in the Emerald City.) sengers and freight – large trucks create Commission sponsored Rail Capacity In concert with research done by the much of the wear on streets and high- and Needs Study is rapidly proceeding state DOT Rail Office, I found that what ways and at least some freight now and scheduled to end in December with passenger train riders and would-be rid- trucked would better be on the rails), van policy recommendations to the legisla- ers want more than anything else is pooling and (Heaven help us!) driving a ture, governor, and WSDOT. All Aboard greater frequency of service. The Cas- bit less were not even considered as Washington Chairman Chuck Mott and I cades are seen by their passengers now other solutions to the problems and costs were actively involved in helping deter- as being a much more pleasant way to of motor vehicle congestion. mine the scope of the study. Of course we need to in- Later, some passenger rail …I found that what passenger train riders vest in road transportation. advocates attended "Lis- and would-be riders want more than Nearly all of us drive or use tening Sessions" around the the highways and want them state. The sessions were anything else is greater frequency of safe and reasonably effi- efforts to discern citizen service. The Cascades are seen by their cient. Most rail advocates views on rail transportation. strongly supported recent Results showed strong sup- passengers now as being a much more legislation that increased port for an even greater pleasant way to travel than flying, driving funding for roads and op- state emphasis on rail, par- posed anti-funding initia- ticularly freight rail. or riding buses. State investments need tives. But not JUST more Recently, members of a to focus on adding more trains. roads, please! Technical Resource Panel An ongoing annoyance (TRP) have been asked to review and travel than flying, driving or riding buses. to this rail advocate is the critique the progress thus far made in the State investments need to focus on add- profound double standard to which in- study. I was appointed to represent rail ing more trains. Faster schedules? vestments in rail are judged compared to passengers on the TRP and have had Some, particularly those taking the train investments in rubber tired infrastructure. several cordial and productive meetings for business, would find that an advan- At a recent hearing by the Puget Sound with and have given written papers to tage, but all day, hourly service, now en- Regional Council on the fate of the East- representatives of Cambridge Systemat- joyed by passengers in two California side rail line (see Jim Cusick’s column on ics, the prime consulting firm responsible corridors, the Northeast Corridor, and that issue), a report on environmental im- for research and study products. much of Europe and East Asia, is what is pacts emphasized that (direct and local- One task of the study was to deter- needed. More riders, the inevitable result ized) impacts would be greater if the rail mine measurable benefits coming from of more service, would be the primary use were continued or increased and far state investment in passenger rail.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • October /November 2007
    Washington Rail News October /November 2007 www.AllAboardWashington.org Publication of All Aboard Washington A NotNot----forforforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." passenger system in the U.S. and continu- Update on the Amtrak Cascades and the ing to develop state partnerships. The Legislature has asked WSDOT for Northwest Corridor from Ken Uznanski an updated midrange Cascades vision. The Ken Uznanski, WSDOT Rail Office quently adjusted two more times to provide report is due Dec. 2008. Ken said we would manager, spoke at the Aug. 11 All more consistent operation. “Amtrak has be looking at 7-8 Seattle-Portland round- Aboard Washington picnic in Puyallup. done a tremendous job” restoring trips a day. He noted that several key leg- Everyone, of course, wanted to know Northwest rail service, concluded Ken. islators are saying 2009 will be the rail about the Talgo trainsets being pulled He recounted his trip to Spain in June session. from service on Thursday Aug. 2 when as part of a trade mission. Also on the trip Ridership on the Cascades has been were Amtrak Pres. Alex Kummant and gov- cracks were discovered in the upper strong this year, up 11% through August. ernment affairs Vice Pres. Joe McHugh. This despite the August drop due to the parts of some of the suspension systems. They met with various government officials These systems provide the ability for the days of cancelled and reduced service. and with Renfre, the Spanish National Rail- Even with the substitute equipment, rider- trains to travel faster through curves than ways. Renfre is spending 1.2-1.6 bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodinville Subdivision - North Rail Line
    PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (Woodinville Subdivision - North Rail Line) THIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the ___ day of April, 2008, by and between BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (“BNSF”), the PORT OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington ("Port”) and KING COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington (“County”). RECITALS A. BNSF owns certain real property (the "Woodinville Subdivision," or "Subdivision") in King County, Washington and Snohomish County, Washington, and operates over such Subdivision, a railroad line from the City of Renton, Washington to the City of Snohomish, Washington. B. The Port desires to enter into this Agreement for the purchase of a portion of such BNSF property and railroad facilities thereon, subject to a easement for freight operations on the Freight Portion of the Property (defined below) under which at Closing the holder of the easement for freight operations will provide freight rail service and will have the exclusive right and obligation to provide such freight service on the Freight Portion of the Property. C. BNSF is willing to sell the North Rail Line (defined below) portion of the Subdivision in the manner described in this Agreement. D. The County desires to use the Railbanked Portion (defined below) for public trail and other transportation purposes following the acquisition of the Woodinville Subdivision by the Port, and, accordingly, the County and BNSF will enter into at Closing an agreement for railbanking and for public space pursuant to and in accordance with 49 C.F.R. 1152.29 and Section 8(d) of the National Trails System Act (also known as the “Rails-to-Trails Act”), 16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State's Freight Rail System
    Statewide Rail Capacity and System Needs Study Task 1.1.A – Washington State’s Freight Rail System technical memorandum prepared for Washington State Transportation Commission prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. HDR, Inc. May 2006 www.wstc.com technical memorandum Statewide Rail Capacity and System Needs Study Task 1.1.A – Washington State’s Freight Rail System prepared for Washington State Transportation Commission prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. HDR, Inc. May 2006 May 2006 Statewide Rail Capacity and Needs Study Task 1.1.A – Freight Rail Systems Table of Contents Task 1.1.A – Washington State’s Freight Rail System ................................................... 1 Summary......................................................................................................................... 1 Objective ......................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology .................................................................................................................. 2 Freight Rail System Overview ..................................................................................... 2 Freight Railroad Descriptions...................................................................................... 5 Ballard Terminal Railroad.................................................................................... 5 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway.............................................................. 5 Cascade & Columbia River Railroad.................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting and Preserving Rail Corridors Against Encroachment of Incompatible Uses
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-09/0-5546-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Protecting and Preserving Rail Corridors Against Encroachment September 2007; Rev. January 2008 of Incompatible Uses 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Lisa Loftus-Otway, C. Michael Walton, Lynn Blais, Nathan 0-5546-1 Hutson 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-5546 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2006–August 2007 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract Rail Corridor preservation and planning for the purpose of reducing or restricting incompatible development is an area of growing importance. This report provides an overview regarding encroachment and the elements that contribute to potentially incompatible development along rail corridors. The report reviews the legal tools that currently exist within Texas for corridor preservation and provides recommendations for new legislation, including draft legislation. The report then reviews the state of practice of corridor planning and preservation with mitigation against encroachment both in Texas and in selected other states around the country. The report pays special attention to incidents in which rail corridors are envisioned to host both freight and passenger services and the implications on land use.
    [Show full text]
  • BNSF Corridor Preservation Study
    BNSF Corridor Preservation Study FINAL REPORT May 2007 Prepared for: Puget Sound Regional Council 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104 500 108th Avenue NE Suite 1200 Bellevue, WA 98004-5549 (425) 450-6200 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS STUDY SPONSOR Puget Sound Regional Council King Cushman, Regional Strategy Advisor BNSF CORRIDOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chairperson: Julia Patterson, King County Councilmember COMMITTEE MEMBERS ♦ LOCAL JURISDICTIONS ♦ CITY OF BELLEVUE CITY OF RENTON Councilmember Don Davidson Councilmember Marcie Palmer CITY OF KIRKLAND CITY OF SNOHOMISH Councilmember Tom Hodgson Councilmember Larry Countryman CITY OF REDMOND CITY OF WOODINVILLE Mayor Rosemarie Ives Mick Monken, Public Works Director KING COUNTY SNOHOMISH COUNTY Councilmember Julia Patterson (Committee Chair) Councilmember Dave Somers Rod Brandon, County Executive’s Office Marc Krandel, Parks Planning and County Executive’s Representative ♦ TRANSPORTATION INTERESTS ♦ BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY SOUND TRANSIT Jerome Johnson, Assist. VP, Network Dev. Councilmember Mary-Alyce Burleigh (City of Kirkland) PORT OF SEATTLE SPIRIT OF WASHINGTON DINNER TRAIN Geri Poor, Regional Transportation Manager, Eric Temple, President/Owner Economic Development Washington State Dept. of Transportation (WSDOT) Chris Picard, Manager, Urban Planning Office ♦ BNSF CORRIDOR USERS/BENEFICIARIES ♦ BICYCLE ALLIANCE OF WASHINGTON DISCOVERY INSTITUTE Louise McGrody, Trails Program Bruce Agnew, Cascadia Project Director BOEING COMPANY EASTSIDE TRANSPORTATION CHOICES Shaunta Hyde, Manager, Local Government Relations, Councilmember Kathy Huckabay (City of Sammamish) Puget Sound PUGET SOUND ENERGY CASCADE BIKE CLUB Susan Hempstead, Local Govt & Community Relations Chuck Ayers, Executive Director WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY Dale King, Manager, Puget Sound Government & Chip Nevins, Senior King County Conservation Director Community Affairs Funding for this document was provided in part by PSRC’s member jurisdictions, grants from U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Made and Entered Into
    REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT THIS REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the ____day of ___________________ (“Effective Date”) by and between the Port of Seattle, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (“Port”) and King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington (“County”). The Port and the County are hereinafter sometimes referred to collectively as the “Parties”. RECITALS A. The Port, County and BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”) entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement and a Donation Agreement dated May 12, 2008 (collectively the “Transfer Agreements”) in order to transfer ownership of real property developed as a rail corridor and commonly known as the Woodinville Subdivision from BNSF to the Port, and to facilitate the County’s use of portions of the Woodinville Subdivision for regional recreational trail and other public uses and transportation uses. BNSF conveyed the Woodinville Subdivision to the Port through deeds dated December 18, 2009 ("BNSF Deeds"). B. The County desires to acquire from the Port those portions of the Woodinville Subdivision located between the City of Woodinville and the City of Renton, Washington (“South Segment”), and the City of Woodinville and the City of Redmond, Washington (“Redmond Spur”), approximate mileposts 23.8 and 5.0, and 0.0 and 3.4, as legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (collectively, the South Segment and the Redmond Spur are referred to as the “Land”). The County also desires to acquire from the Port an easement over a segment of the Woodinville Subdivision located between approximately milepost 23.8 and 27.4 currently in use as an active freight corridor and legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Easement”).
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memo #1: Infrastructure and Operations Assessment PERIOD COVERED JAN-JULY 2014
    Technical Memo #1: Infrastructure and Operations Assessment PERIOD COVERED JAN-JULY 2014 Prepared by the Olsson Associates Team Prepared for the Montana Department of Transportation 10.27.2014 Technical Memo #1 | Infrastructure and Operations Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 1 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date October 27, 2014 Great Northern Corridor SWOT Analysis – Technical Memorandum #1 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. 1 Olsson Associates Parsons Brinckerhoff The Beckett Group 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Olsson Associates th 2111 S. 67 Street, Suite 200 11. Contract or Grant No. Omaha, NE 68106 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Research Programs Type: Technical Memorandum Montana Department of Transportation Period Covered: January 2014-July 2014 2701 Prospect Avenue PO Box 201001 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 5401 Helena MT 59620-1001 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Montana Department of Transportation and the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract For the Great Northern Corridor Coalition, the Olsson Associates team is conducting a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis of the Great Northern Corridor. Technical Memorandum #1 serves as The Great Northern Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Assessment Report and provides a comprehensive description of the GNC from a freight multimodal infrastructure and operations perspective. Following are the primary GNC elements included in the report: • The existing Class I railway line operated by BNSF Railway between Chicago, Illinois and Duluth, Minnesota on the east, and Portland Oregon, Seattle, Washington and Vancouver, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution No. 3692
    Item No. 6c_Exhibit_A Date of Meeting: July 22, 2014 RESOLUTION NO. 3692 A RESOLUTION of the Port Commission of the Port of Seattle declaring certain real property located in the Cities of Woodinville and Bothell in King County (portions of the Woodinville Subdivision) and any improvements located thereon surplus and no longer needed for Port purposes, authorizing its transfer to the City of Woodinville, and authorizing the Chief Executive Officer to execute all documents related to such transfer. WHEREAS, the voters of King County, pursuant to the provisions of enabling legislation adopted by the Legislature of the State of Washington, Chapter 92, Laws of 1911, RCW 53.04.010, authorized and approved at a special election held in King County on the 5th day of September 1911, the formation of a port district coextensive with King County to be known as the Port of Seattle; and WHEREAS, the Port of Seattle was thereupon established as a port district and has since been and now is a duly authorized and acting port district of the State of Washington; and WHEREAS, the Port owns the real property described on attached Exhibit A (the “Property”) and all improvements thereon, consisting primarily of railroad tracks and ties (the “Improvements”); and WHEREAS, on November 5, 2009, the Port entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) with King County, Sound Transit, Cascade Water Alliance, Puget Sound Energy and the City of Redmond (“Regional Partners”) setting forth the mutual understanding of the parties for the completion of future
    [Show full text]
  • Ballard Terminal Railroad Company, LLC
    43963 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE DECEMBER 30, 2014 EB SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. FD 35731 BALLARD TERMINAL RAILROAD COMPANY, L.L.C.—ACQUISITION AND OPERATION EXEMPTION—WOODINVILLE SUBDIVISION Docket No. AB 6 (Sub-No. 465X) BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY—ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION—IN KING COUNTY, WASH. (WOODINVILLE SUBDIVISION) Digest:1 This decision denies Ballard Terminal Railroad Company, L.L.C.’s request for authority to reinstitute rail service on a line of railroad owned by the City of Kirkland, Wash., Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, and King County, Wash. that is currently subject to interim trail use/rail banking under the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d). The Board also denies Ballard’s related petition to partially vacate the notice of interim trail use that had been issued for the line. Decided: December 30, 2014 Ballard Terminal Railroad Company, L.L.C. (Ballard) seeks authority in Docket No. FD 35731 to reinstitute rail service over 11.2 miles of the former BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) rail line known as the Woodinville Subdivision (the Line). The Line is currently subject to interim trail use/rail banking under § 8(d) of the National Trails System Act (Trails Act), 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d). Ballard does not currently hold the reactivation right or a property interest in the Line; those interests are owned by the City of Kirkland, Wash. (Kirkland), King County, Wash. (King County), and Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) (collectively, the Regional Parties). The Regional Parties oppose Ballard’s petition to reinstitute service on the Line and its related petition to partially vacate the Trails Act condition imposed in Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Template Revised May 30, 2013. PORT of SEATTLE MEMORANDUM COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 6C ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting July 22, 20
    PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 6c ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting July 22, 2014 DATE: July 14, 2014 TO: Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer FROM: Joe McWilliams, Managing Director, Real Estate Division SUBJECT: Second Reading and Final Passage of Resolution No. 3692, surplusing and sale of a portion of the Eastside Rail Corridor to City of Woodinville. Net Proceeds to the Port: $1,100,000 minus closing costs Closing Date: XXXX ACTION REQUESTED Request Second Reading and Final Passage of Resolution No. 3692: A Resolution of the Port Commission of the Port of Seattle declaring certain real property located in the Cities of Woodinville and Bothell in King County (portions of the Woodinville Subdivision) and any improvements located thereon surplus and no longer needed for Port purposes, authorizing its transfer to the City of Woodinville, and authorizing the Chief Executive Officer to execute all documents related to such transfer. SYNOPSIS Commission authorization is requested to proceed with the sale of the remaining portion of the Woodinville Subdivision to the City of Woodinville. This request is subsequent to the agreement between the Port, Redmond, King County, Sound Transit, Cascade Water Alliance, and Puget Sound Energy (“Regional Partners”) to share in the costs of the acquisition of the Woodinville Subdivision rail corridor (“Eastside Corridor”), and subsequent transactions conveying portions of the Eastside Corridor. BACKGROUND The Port acquired the Eastside Corridor on December 18, 2009, from BNSF Railway. Prior to finalizing the acquisition, the Port, the City of Redmond, King County, Sound Transit, Cascade Water Alliance, and Puget Sound Energy (“Regional Partners”) agreed that they all had an interest in obtaining rights to use the Eastside Corridor and share in the cost of acquiring it for public ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement
    REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT THIS REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGI ZEEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and entered into as of this j 5 day of ` A 2014 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the Port of Seattle, a municip corporation of the State of Washington ("Port"), and Snohomish County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington ("County"), acting in its governmental capacity. The Port and the County are hereinafter sometimes referred to jointly as the "Parties." I 7 Big V 11 R►y A. On or about December 18, 2009, the Port acquired from BNSF Railway Company ("BNSF") pursuant to a Quit Claim Deed (the `BNSF Deed") recorded under Snohomish County Auditor's File No. 200912210438, real property developed as a rail corridor and commonly known as the Woodinville Subdivision. B. Sections of the Woodinville Subdivision are improved with rail tracks and certain commercial and industrial structures and fixtures associated with rail operations (the "Improvements"). The Improvements were acquired by the Port from BNSF pursuant to a Bill of Sale (the `BNSF Bill of Sale") executed on or about December 18, 2009. The Improvements include that certain bridge structure over the Snohomish River connecting portions of the Woodinville Subdivision (the "Snohomish River Bridge"). C. In addition to crossing the Snohomish River, the Snohomish River Bridge crosses certain real property owned or controlled by BNSF (the `BNSF Mainline"). Concurrent with the execution of the BNSF Deed and the BNSF Bill of Sale, the Port acquired by Easement Agreement a non-exclusive perpetual easement across and above the BNSF Mainline (the "Bridge Easement").
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM of UNDERSTANDING Regarding Acquisition of the Woodinville Subdivision CONTRACT 6306
    CONTRACT 6306 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Regarding Acquisition of the Woodinville Subdivision This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING is made by and among the Port of Seattle, a Washington municipal corporation ("Port"), Sound Transit, a regional transit authority ("Sound Transit"), King County, a political subdivision of Washington ("King County"), the City of Redmond, a Washington municipal corporation ("Redmond"), the Cascade Water Alliance, a Washington non-profit corporation ("Cascade"), and Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washington corporation ("PSE") (collectively, the "Parties") as of the li:..._th day of November, 2009. WHEREAS: (A) BNSF desires to sell in part and donate in part the Woodinville Subdivision, which is a railroad corridor extending from the City of Renton northerly to the City of Snohomish, and including a spur corridor extending from the City of Woodinville to the City of Redmond; and (B) The Port, King County and BNSF previously executed a purchase and sale agreement and donation agreement for the acquisition and partial railbanking of the Woodinville Subdivision; and (CJ Additional regional partners have been identified to share in the cost of acquiring the Woodinville Subdivision for public ownership; and (DJ The alignments under consideration for Sound Transit's Eastlink light rail project require property rights within the Woodinville Subdivision; and (E) Sound Transit, Redmond, Cascade and PSE have each expressed an interest in part1c1patmg in the acquisition and preservation of the Woodinville Subdivision in public
    [Show full text]