The Railroad Depot: a Photographic Essay
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Local Option Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, (Stadium Project), Series 2015
NOTICE OF SALE $64,765,000* Tampa Sports Authority Local Option Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, (Stadium Project), Series 2015 ELECTRONIC BIDS, via BiDCOMP/PARITY Competitive Bidding System (BiDCOMP/Parity) only, will be received by the Tampa Sports Authority (the "Issuer") for the purchase of all, but not less than all, of the Issuer’s $64,765,000* Local Option Sales Tax Payments Refunding Revenue Bonds (“Bonds”), until 10:45 a.m., local Tampa, Florida time, on Tuesday, December 16, 2014. The Bonds Authorization and Security The Bonds are being issued under and pursuant to the authority of and in full compliance with the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, including particularly Chapter 96-520, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1996, as amended, Section 212.055(2), Florida Statutes, as amended and other applicable provisions of law (collectively, the "Act"), Resolution No. 05- 14-01 adopted by the Issuer on November 20, 2014, as amended and supplemented from time to time (the "Resolution") and the Second Amended and Restated Trust Indenture dated as of January 6, 2015 by and between the Issuer and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the "Indenture"). The Bonds are subject to all the terms and conditions of the Indenture. The Bonds are being issued to refund all of the Tampa Sports Authority Local Option Sales Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds (Stadium Project), Series 2005, finance certain capital improvements to a community stadium and to pay certain costs and expenses relating to the issuance of the Bonds. The Bonds and the -
Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor
VOLUME I Executive Summary and Main Report Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation January 2004 Disclaimer: This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation solely in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof, nor does it express any opinion whatsoever on the merit or desirability of the project(s) described herein. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Any trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Note: In an effort to better inform the public, this document contains references to a number of Internet web sites. Web site locations change rapidly and, while every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of these references as of the date of publication, the references may prove to be invalid in the future. Should an FRA document prove difficult to find, readers should access the FRA web site (www.fra.dot.gov) and search by the document’s title or subject. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FRA/RDV-04/02 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2004 Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor⎯Volume I 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors: 8. Performing Organization Report No. For the engineering contractor: Michael C. Holowaty, Project Manager For the sponsoring agency: Richard U. Cogswell and Neil E. Moyer 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. -
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form Aatiflaaleoglat^
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service ' * -, National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name North Plant City Residential District_________________________ other names/site number N/A am 5.185 2. Location Bounded by Herring, Wheeler, Tever & street & number _ not for publication city or town _____Pjapt r'/i+y__________________________________ N/A D vicinity state______Florida___ code FT, v county Hillsbn-nmigh code 057 zip code 33566 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this Qg nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property B meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. -
All Aboard for Tampa Union Station and Tampa Train Day!
All Aboard for Tampa Union Station And Tampa Train Day! An Invitation for Your Company to Sponsor the Eleventh Annual Celebration of Tampa Train Day at One of Tampa’s Most Beloved Landmarks www.tampaunionstation.com Friends of Tampa Union Station is inviting your company to join the Tampa Train Day celebration at Tampa Union Station by becoming a sponsor of the event, to be held on Saturday, May 12, 2018. Sponsorship opportunities are available at several levels, making your participation both highly visible and cost-effective. About Friends of Tampa Union Station Friends of Tampa Union Station is an all-volunteer organization which advocates for the preservation of historic Tampa Union Station as both a landmark and transportation asset. --Friends of Tampa Union Station Mission Statement Friends of Tampa Union Station, Inc. is a grassroots, all-volunteer, nonprofit organization which is registered 501(c) (3) with the IRS. We’re working actively to help assure Tampa Union Station’s future through creating an endowment fund for ongoing restoration at Tampa Union Station and by engaging the public in a conversation about the past, present, and future of this Tampa institution. To date, one of Friends of Tampa Union Station’s most successful initiatives has been organizing Train Day festivities at the station each year. Over the years, thousands have come to Tampa Union Station for Tampa Train Day to take in railroad equipment on display, model railroad displays, exhibits from a variety of local organizations on history and transportation, and much more. In 2018, the eleventh annual Train Day (on Saturday, May 12) will take place at Tampa Union Station. -
Petersburg Area Transit (PAT), Which Is Operated by the City of Petersburg
KFH GROUP, INC. The Tri-Cities Area 2010 Transit Development Plan Final Report October, 2010 Prepared for: The Crater Planning District Commission 4920 Elm Street, Suite 350 —Bethesda, MD 20814 —(301) 951-8660 — FAX (301) 951-0026 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1 – Overview of Transit in the Tri-Cities................................................................ 1-1 History ................................................................................................................................. 1-3 Governance and Organizational Structure ..................................................................... 1-5 Transit Services Provided and Areas Served.................................................................. 1-5 Fare Structure.................................................................................................................... 1-21 Vehicle Fleet....................................................................................................................... 1-21 Facilities.............................................................................................................................. 1-22 Transit Security Program................................................................................................. 1-25 Public Outreach................................................................................................................. 1-27 Stimulus Projects............................................................................................................... 1-27 Chapter -
Market Insight Florida Multifamily Report | Third Quarter 2018
CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD FLORIDA MULTIFAMILY ADVISORY GROUP MARKET INSIGHT FLORIDA MULTIFAMILY REPORT | THIRD QUARTER 2018 The Cushman & Wakefield Florida Multifamily Research Team provides in-depth coverage of primary, secondary, and tertiary cities across the state. In addition to analyzing multifamily rent and sales trends, these reports examine employment data, job growth trends, key economic announcements, and development pipeline news. IN THIS EDITION ► Miami ► Fort Lauderdale ► West Palm Beach ► Orlando ► Tampa ► Jacksonville SELECTION OF RECENT TEAM TRANSACTIONS FLORIDA TEAM LEADERS TEAM LEADER ROBERT GIVEN, VICE CHAIRMAN +1 954 377 0513 | [email protected] SOUTH FLORIDA ZACHARY SACKLEY, EXEC. MANAGING DIRECTOR +1 954 377 0515 | [email protected] TROY BALLARD, SENIOR DIRECTOR +1 954 377 0514 | [email protected] CALUM WEAVER, EXEC. MANAGING DIR. (PCG) +1 954 377 0517 | [email protected] LUZANO THE PLACE AT DANIA BEACH 33 WEST Pompano Beach, FL Dania Beach, FL Davie, FL ERROL BLUMER, ASSOCIATE (LAND) +1 954 377 0499 | [email protected] 404 units / Built 2017 144 units / Built 2017 376 units / Built 2014 NEAL VICTOR, DIRECTOR +1 954 377 0518 | [email protected] ORLANDO JAY BALLARD, SENIOR DIRECTOR +1 407 541 4406 | [email protected] KEN DELVILLAR, SENIOR DIRECTOR +1 407 541 4441 | [email protected] TAMPA LUIS ELORZA, SENIOR DIRECTOR +1 813 204 5319 | [email protected] BRAD CAPAS, SENIOR DIRECTOR +1 813 204 5316 | [email protected] VISTA VERDE CANOPY VILLAS MOSIAC AT THE FORUM Miami, FL Orlando, FL Fort Myers, FL JACKSONVILLE 302 units / Built 1993 296 units / Built 1981 252 units / Built 2017 JULIE BOHN, DIRECTOR +1 904 859 2911 | [email protected] Next Page MARKET INSIGHT Third Quarter 2018 MIAMI 1 MIAMI, FL ECONOMIC EXPANSION The following are select job announcements from the third quarter 2018: EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT TRENDS Popeyes, the fast food chain, has plans to move their headquarters to Miami from Atlanta. -
Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 58, Number 4
Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 58 Number 4 Florida Historical Quarterly, Volume Article 1 58, Number 4 1979 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 58, Number 4 Florida Historical Society [email protected] Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Society, Florida Historical (1979) "Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 58, Number 4," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 58 : No. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol58/iss4/1 Society: Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 58, Number 4 Published by STARS, 1979 1 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol. 58 [1979], No. 4, Art. 1 COVER The Chautauqua Movement which began in 1874 in upper state New York as a Sunday school assembly spread rapidly throughout the South. A Chautauqua group was founded at DeFuniak Springs, Florida, in 1884, and large crowds assembled annually to hear inspirational and scientific lectures, dramatic readings, and musical performances. This is a photograph, ca. 1913, of the train arriving in DeFuniak Springs with the visitors for the Florida Chautauqua. The original photograph is owned by Mrs. Mary Harris of DeFuniak Springs, and the copy was loaned by the John C. Pace Library, University of West Florida, Pensacola. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol58/iss4/1 2 Society: Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 58, Number 4 The Florida Historical THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Volume LVIII, Number 4 April 1980 COPYRIGHT 1980 by the Florida Historical Society, Tampa, Florida. -
The Florida Historical Quarterly Volume Xlv October 1966 Number 2
O CTOBER 1966 Published by THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF FLORIDA, 1856 THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY, successor, 1902 THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY, incoporated, 1905 by GEORGE R. FAIRBANKS, FRANCIS P. FLEMING, GEORGE W. WILSON, CHARLES M. COOPER, JAMES P. TALIAFERRO, V. W. SHIELDS, WILLIAM A. BLOUNT, GEORGE P. RANEY. OFFICERS WILLIAM M. GOZA, president HERBERT J. DOHERTY, JR., 1st vice president JAMES C. CRAIG, 2nd vice president MRS. RALPH F. DAVID, recording secretary MARGARET L. CHAPMAN, executive secretary DIRECTORS CHARLES O. ANDREWS, JR. MILTON D. JONES EARLE BOWDEN FRANK J. LAUMER JAMES D. BRUTON, JR. WILLIAM WARREN ROGERS MRS. HENRY J. BURKHARDT CHARLTON W. TEBEAU FRANK H. ELMORE LEONARD A. USINA WALTER S. HARDIN JULIAN I. WEINKLE JOHN E. JOHNS JAMES R. KNOTT, ex-officio SAMUEL PROCTOR, ex-officio (and the officers) (All correspondence relating to Society business, memberships, and Quarterly subscriptions should be addressed to Miss Margaret Ch apman, University of South Florida Library, Tampa, Florida 33620. Articles for publication, books for review, and editorial correspondence should be ad- dressed to the Quarterly, Box 14045, University Station, Gainesville, Florida, 32601.) * * * To explore the field of Florida history, to seek and gather up the ancient chronicles in which its annals are contained, to retain the legendary lore which may yet throw light upon the past, to trace its monuments and remains, to elucidate what has been written to disprove the false and support the true, to do justice to the men who have figured in the olden time, to keep and preserve all that is known in trust for those who are to come after us, to increase and extend the knowledge of our history, and to teach our children that first essential knowledge, the history of our State, are objects well worthy of our best efforts. -
4.0 Historical Overview
4-1 4.0 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW The following overview traces the historical development of the general study area from the European settlement through the twentieth century. The intent of this overview is to serve as a guide to field investigations by identifying the possible locations of any historic cultural resources within the project area and to provide expectations regarding the potential historic significance of any such sites. It also provides a context with which to interpret any historic resources encountered during the study. 4.1 European Contact and Colonial Period (1513–1821) Three Native American ethnic groups were known to inhabit east central Florida at the time of Spanish contact: the Ais, the Mayaca, and the Jororo. The Ais lived along the Atlantic Coast and were closely involved with the Spanish. They inhabited the coastal strand and Indian River areas at this time. They apparently mixed indigenous hunting/gathering/fishing economy with the salvaging of Spanish shipwrecks (Milanich 1995:64-65). The Mayaca and Jororo peoples occupied an area from north-central Florida to as far south as Lake Okeechobee (Mitchem et al. 1998). The earliest contact between the native populations and the Europeans occurred through slave hunting expeditions. “Slaving expeditions,” which provided workers for the mines of Hispaniola and Cuba, were not recorded in official documents as the Spanish Crown prohibited the enslavement of Caribbean natives. Evidence of these slave raids comes from the familiarity with the Florida coast stated by navigators of the earliest official coastal reconnaissance surveys (Cabeza de Vaca 1922: Chapter 4). The hostile response of the native population to expeditions during the 1520s may confirm this hypothesis. -
The Florida Rail System Plan: Investment Element
The Florida Rail System Plan: Investment Element prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. With support from Planning Innovations, Inc Quandel Consultants December 2010 Florida Department of Transportation CHARLIE CRIST " STEPHANIE C. KOPELOUSOS 605 Suwannee Street GOVERNOR Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 SECRETARY December 14, 2010 Citizens of Florida: I am pleased to submit to you the Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan. Unlike in past years, where the Florida Rail System Plan was more descriptive of the separate freight and passenger rail systems, this plan is more visionary, strategic, and policy-driven. The plan was guided by a broad base of stakeholders, including the Rail Stakeholder Advisory Committee, members of the public and private sectors, modes of transportation, economic development and environmental interests, and citizen representatives. The Committee and others worked throughout the summer and fall of 2009 to develop an inventory of Florida's rail system needs and recommend priority investments that support the strategic goals, objectives, and policies of the Florida Rail System Plan. The Florida Rail System Plan is comprised of a Policy Element and this document, the Investment Element. The Policy Element provides a broad policy framework for the investment of limited state resources in Florida's rail system. The Investment Element builds upon the framework of the Policy Element by identifying the needs of Florida's rail system, establishing priorities for the investment of state funds, and setting forth future action steps necessary to implement the plan. Florida in the year 2030 will be shaped by the actions, decisions, and policy choices made today. -
2002 Florida Rail System Plan
2002 FLORIDA RAIL SYSTEM PLAN Florida Department of Transportation 2002 FLORIDA RAIL SYTEM PLAN Florida Department of Transportation with assistance from Wilbur Smith Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E-1 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION Purpose and Authority..................................................................................................... 1-1 Responsibilities ............................................................................................................... 1-2 Program Components..................................................................................................... 1-4 Rail Project Funding ........................................................................................................ 1-4 Public Involvement Process ............................................................................................ 1-6 Document Summary by Chapter ..................................................................................... 1-7 CHAPTER 2 - FREIGHT RAIL/INTERMODAL Rail System Components ............................................................................................... 2-1 Rail Traffic and Flows ..................................................................................................... 2-9 Rail Program Implications ............................................................................................... 2-22 CHAPTER 3 - PASSENGER RAIL/INTERMODAL FDOT Role..................................................................................................................... -
The Benefits of Intercity Passenger Rail
THE BENEFITS OF INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL (110–54) HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON RAILROADS, PIPELINES, AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 26, 2007 Printed for the use of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 36–685 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:27 Feb 08, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\DOCS\36685 HTRANS1 PsN: JASON COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE JAMES L. OBERSTAR, Minnesota, Chairman NICK J. RAHALL, II, West Virginia JOHN L. MICA, Florida PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon DON YOUNG, Alaska JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois THOMAS E. PETRI, Wisconsin ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina Columbia JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee JERROLD NADLER, New York WAYNE T. GILCHREST, Maryland CORRINE BROWN, Florida VERNON J. EHLERS, Michigan BOB FILNER, California STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas RICHARD H. BAKER, Louisiana GENE TAYLOR, Mississippi FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland JERRY MORAN, Kansas ELLEN O. TAUSCHER, California GARY G. MILLER, California LEONARD L. BOSWELL, Iowa ROBIN HAYES, North Carolina TIM HOLDEN, Pennsylvania HENRY E. BROWN, JR., South Carolina BRIAN BAIRD, Washington TIMOTHY V. JOHNSON, Illinois RICK LARSEN, Washington TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts SAM GRAVES, Missouri JULIA CARSON, Indiana BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania TIMOTHY H.