DOCSLIB.ORG

THE DANUBE, PRUT and BLACK SEA RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN in REPUBLIC of MOLDOVA for the Second Planning Cycle (2022-2027)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE DANUBE, PRUT and BLACK SEA RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN in REPUBLIC of MOLDOVA for the Second Planning Cycle (2022-2027) European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) THE DANUBE, PRUT AND BLACK SEA RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN IN REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA for the second planning cycle (2022-2027) TECHNICAL REPORT N°4: SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING IN THE DANUBE-PRUT AND BLACK SEA RIVER BASIN DISTRICT FINAL DRAFT April 2020 Beneficiaries IWRM department of the MARDE (legislation and supervision), Agency “Apele Moldovei” (Planning coordination and follow up of imple- mentation), Agency for Geology and Mineral Resources (groundwater) Produced by Environmental Agency Austria, Umweltbundesamt (UBA) GmbH (AT) Authors Surface water experts: Daniel Trauner, Peggy Macaigne, Daniela Csar, blattfisch e.U., Christian Pichler-Scheder, blattfisch e.U. Kristina Schau- fler, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) & Georg Wolfram, DWS Hydro- Ökologie, Groundwater experts: Andreas Scheidleder, Franko Humer, Umweltbun- desamt GmbH (AT) Produced for: MoARDE, Environmental Agency, Agency of Geology and Mineral Re- sources, Agency “Apele Moldovei”, State Hydrometerological Service Date 29 of April 2020 Version Final Acknowledgements: Boris Iurciuc, Natalia Zgîrcu Financed by: European Union Co-financed by: Austrian Development Agency and the Artois-Picardie Water Agency (France) for the implementing Member States Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document on the “Technical Report N°4 Surface and Groundwater Monitoring in the Prut River Basin District” was produced by the EU member state consortium with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area. Imprint Owner and Editor: EU Member State Consortium Umweltbundesamt GmbH Office International de’l Eau (IOW) Spittelauer Lände 5 21/23 rue de Madrid 1090 Vienna, Austria 75008 Paris, FRANCE Responsible IOW Communication officer: Yunona Videnina, y.videnina@oieau.fr; Chloé Dechelette, c.dechelette@oieau.fr Page | 2 Overview of surface water monitoring in the Prut River Basin District (Moldova) CONTENTS 1 Surface Water Monitoring ................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 WFD monitoring requirements .................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Current surface water monitoring situation ................................................................................. 8 1.2.1 Chemical Monitoring ......................................................................................................... 8 1.2.2 Biological Monitoring ...................................................................................................... 11 1.2.3 Hydro-morphological Monitoring .................................................................................... 12 1.3 Monitoring results ..................................................................................................................... 13 1.3.1 Chemical Status ............................................................................................................. 13 1.3.2 Ecological Status ............................................................................................................ 13 1.3.3 Hydro-morphological Status ........................................................................................... 16 1.4 Proposed surface water monitoring .......................................................................................... 17 1.4.1 Measures to improve the surface water monitoring ....................................................... 17 1.4.2 Chemical Monitoring ....................................................................................................... 18 1.4.3 Biological Monitoring ...................................................................................................... 19 1.4.4 Hydro-morphological Monitoring .................................................................................... 20 1.4.5 Monitoring Costs............................................................................................................. 21 1.5 References ............................................................................................................................... 21 2 Groundwater Monitoring ................................................................................................................... 22 2.1 Current groundwater monitoring situation ................................................................................ 22 2.1.1 Chemical groundwater monitoring.................................................................................. 23 2.1.2 Quantitative groundwater monitoring ............................................................................. 24 2.2 Monitoring results ..................................................................................................................... 24 2.2.1 Chemical groundwater monitoring.................................................................................. 24 2.2.2 Quantitative groundwater monitoring ............................................................................. 24 2.3 Proposed groundwater monitoring system ............................................................................... 25 2.3.1 Chemical groundwater monitoring.................................................................................. 26 2.3.2 Quantitative groundwater monitoring ............................................................................. 27 2.4 List of references ...................................................................................................................... 28 3 Annexes ............................................................................................................................................ 29 3.1 Annex 1. Tables ........................................................................................................................ 29 3.2 Annex 2. Procedure for the selection of operational monitoring sites ...................................... 35 3.2.1 Surveillance monitoring .................................................................................................. 35 3.2.2 Operational monitoring ................................................................................................... 35 3.2.3 Investigative monitoring .................................................................................................. 38 3.3 Annex 3: list of groundwater monitoring sites ........................................................................... 39 Page | 3 Overview of surface water monitoring in the Prut River Basin District (Moldova) Page | 4 Overview of surface water monitoring in the Prut River Basin District (Moldova) List of Tables Table 1: Overview of current chemical monitoring in rivers of the DPBS RBD (Complete list of sites see Annex 1 Table 23). ..................................................................................................................... 8 Table 2: Overview of current chemical monitoring in lakes of the DPBS RBD (Complete list of sites see Annex 1 Table 23). ..................................................................................................................... 9 Table 3: Overview of existing biological monitoring in rivers of the DPBS RBD. .................................. 11 Table 4: Overview of existing biological monitoring in lakes and standing waters of in the DPBS RBD. ................................................................................................................................................. 12 Table 5: Overview of existing hydrological monitoring in rivers of the DRBS RBD............................... 13 Table 6: Overview of existing hydrological monitoring in lakes and reservoirs of the DPBS RBD. ...... 13 Table 7: Categories of ecological classification..................................................................................... 14 Table 8: Hydro-morphological sampling sites including hydro-morphological status ........................... 16 Table 9: Overview of proposed chemical monitoring in rivers of the BPBS RBD (Complete list of sites see Annex 1 Table 17, Table 19, and Table 23). ..................................................................... 18 Table 10: Overview of proposed chemical monitoring in lakes of the DPBS RBD (Complete list of sites see Annex 1 Table 18, Table 20, and Table 23). ..................................................................... 19 Table 11 Overview of proposed biological monitoring in rivers of in the DPBS RBD (Complete list of sites see Annex 1 Table 17 and Table 19). ............................................................................. 19 Table 12: Overview of proposed biological monitoring in lakes of
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

37 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Implementa on of Basin Management Principle
    Implementaon of basin management principle in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia European Union Water Iniave Naonal Policy Dialogues progress report 2016 May 2016 Implementaon of basin management principle in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia ii Copyright © 2016 United Naons Economic Commission for Europe and Organizaon for Economic Cooperaon and Development The designaons employed and the presentaon of the material in this publicaon do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Naons Economic Commission for Europe and Organizaon for Economic Cooperaon and Development concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or concerning the delimitaon of its froners or boundaries. This publicaon has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. CONTACT INFORMATION Convenon on the Protecon and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and Internaonal Lakes United Naons Economic Commission for Europe Organizaon for Economic Co-operaon and Development Palais des Naons 2 rue André-Pascal CH - 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland 75775 Paris, Cedex 16, France Tel.: + 41 22 917 1193 Tel.: + 33 1 4524 9294 Fax: + 41 22 917 0107 Fax: + 33 1 4430 6183 E-mail: water.convenon@unece.org E-mail: water-npd@oecd.org Website: www.unece.org/env/water/npd Website: www.oecd.org/env/outreach/npd-water-eecca.htm Implementaon of basin management principle in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia iii CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................... iv FOREWORD .................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project Strengthening the Implementation Capacities for Nutrient Reduction and Transboundary Cooperation in the Danube River Basin
    UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project Strengthening the Implementation Capacities for Nutrient Reduction and Transboundary Cooperation in the Danube River Basin Workshop on Developing Pilot Projects for the Promotion of Best Agricultural Practice in the Danube River Basin Project Output 1.3: Pilot Projects on Agricultural Pollution Reduction 19 – 20 January 2004, Bucharest, Romania GFA Terra Systems in co-operation with Avalon Contents Introduction to the Workshop.................................................................................................................. 1 Workshop Objectives and Approach ................................................................................................... 1 Conclusions from Preceding Workshop in Zagreb (October 2003) .................................................... 2 Summary of Workshop Presentations ..................................................................................................... 4 Introduction to the Concept of Using Pilot Projects for the Promotion of BAP.................................. 4 Agricultural Management Systems in the Floodplains of the River Leine.......................................... 5 Previous Experiences with Pilot Projects in the Danube River Basin ................................................. 6 Best Agricultural Practice and Extension Services in Romania .......................................................... 7 Presentation of Proposed BAP Pilot Projects .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential of the Development of Ecotourism in the Republic of Moldova Through the Prism of National Tourist Areas
    MODERN MANAGEMENT REVIEW 2019 MMR, vol. XXIV, 26 (2/2019), p. 7-14 April-June Maria HĂMURARU 1 Adriana BUZDUGAN 2 THE POTENTIAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECOTOURISM IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA THROUGH THE PRISM OF NATIONAL TOURIST AREAS The Republic of Moldova is an important area for tourism, rich in natural objectives and com- plexes allowing the development of a sustainable form of tourism – ecotourism. Therefore, it is worth noting the presence of natural ecosystems that have the potential for ecotourism de- velopment in the protected areas and other natural territories, which have good natural condi- tions for outdoor activities, such as: hiking, flora and fauna observation, sports and cultural activities. This study presents the analysis of the Republic of Moldova protected natural areas which are 8 national tourist zones with major opportunities for the ecotourism development. Keywords: tourism, ecotourism, tourist areas, tourist potential, reservations, natural areas. 1. INTRODUCTION Ecotourism is one of the areas of scientific and practical concern in most countries of the world, as it contributes to sustainable development through its activities. The modest geographic dimensions of urban areas in the Republic of Moldova cannot allow mass tour- ism to take place. Ecotourism reveals a real opportunity for the development of the country's areas that have the resources and conditions necessary for its revaluation. Ecotourism is a safe alternative for capitalizing on natural landscapes and ecological biodiversity in inter- national tourist attractiveness. The aim of the research is to identify ways of developing and promoting ecological tourism in the Republic of Moldova as a business opportunity with its substantial ad- vantages.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft the Prut River Basin Management Plan 2016
    Environmental Protection of International River Basins This project is implemented by a Consortium led by Hulla and Co. (EPIRB) HumanDynamics KG Contract No 2011/279-666, EuropeAid/131360/C/SER/Multi Project Funded by Ministry of Environment the European Union DRAFT THE PRUT RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 - 2021 Prepared in alignment to the EuropeanWater Framework Directive2000/60/EC Prepared by Institute of Ecology and Geography of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova Chisinau, 2015 Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1.General description of the Prut River Basin ................................................................................. 7 1.1. Natural conditions .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.1. Climate and vegetation................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.2. Geological structure and geomorphology ....................................................................................... 8 1.1.3. Surface water resources.................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.3.1. Rivers .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exceptional Floods in the Prut Basin, Romania, in the Context of Heavy
    1 Exceptional floods in the Prut basin, Romania, in the context of 2 heavy rains in the summer of 2010 3 4 Gheorghe Romanescu1, Cristian Constantin Stoleriu 5 Alexandru Ioan Cuza, University of Iasi, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Department of 6 Geography, Bd. Carol I, 20 A, 700505 Iasi, Romania 7 8 Abstract. The year 2010 was characterized by devastating flooding in Central and Eastern 9 Europe, including Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. This 10 study focuses on floods that occurred during the summer of 2010 in the Prut River basin, 11 which has a high percentage of hydrotechnical infrastructure. Strong floods occurred in 12 eastern Romania on the Prut River, which borders the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, and 13 the Siret River. Atmospheric instability from 21 June-1 July 2010 caused significant amounts 14 of rain, with rates of 51.2 mm/50 min and 42.0 mm/30 min. In the middle Prut basin, there are 15 numerous ponds that help mitigate floods as well as provide water for animals, irrigation, and 16 so forth. The peak discharge of the Prut River during the summer of 2010 was 2,310 m3/s at 17 the Radauti Prut gauging station. High discharges were also recorded on downstream 18 tributaries, including the Baseu, Jijia, and Miletin. High discharges downstream occurred 19 because of water from the middle basin and the backwater from the Danube (a historic 20 discharge of 16,300 m3/s). The floods that occurred in the Prut basin in the summer of 2010 21 could not be controlled completely because the discharges far exceeded foreseen values.
    [Show full text]
  • Actual Problems of Protection and Sustainable Use of the Animal World Diversity
    ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF MOLDOVA DEPARTMENT OF NATURE AND LIFE SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY Actual problems of protection and sustainable use of ThE animal world diversity International Conference of Zoologists dedicated to the 50th anniversary from the foundation of Institute of Zoology of ASM Chisinau – 2011 ACTUAL PRObLEMS OF PROTECTION AND SUSTAINAbLE USE OF ThE ANIMAL wORLD DIVERSITY Content CZU 59/599:502.74 (082) D 53 Dumitru Murariu. READING ABOUT SPECIES CONCEPT IN BIOLOGY.......................................................................10 Dan Munteanu. AChievements Of Romania in ThE field Of nature The materials of International Conference of Zoologists „Actual problems of protection and protection and implementation Of European Union’S rules concerning ThE biodiversity conservation (1990-2010)...............................................................................11 sustainable use of animal world diversity” organized by the Institute of Zoology of the Aca- demy of Sciences of Moldova in celebration of the 50th anniversary of its foundation are a gene- Laszlo Varadi. ThE protection and sustainable use Of Aquatic resources.....................................13 ralization of the latest scientific researches in the country and abroad concerning the diversity of aquatic and terrestrial animal communities, molecular-genetic methods in systematics, phylo- Terrestrial Vertebrates.................................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Drainage Basin of the Black Sea
    165 CHAPTER 5 DRAINAGE BASIN OF THE BLACK SEA This chapter deals with the assessment of transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwa- ters, as well as selected Ramsar Sites and other wetlands of transboundary importance, which are located in the basin of the Black Sea. Assessed transboundary waters in the drainage basin of the Black Sea Transboundary groundwaters Ramsar Sites/wetlands of Basin/sub-basin(s) Recipient Riparian countries Lakes in the basin within the basin transboundary importance Rezovska/Multudere Black Sea BG, TR Danube Black Sea AT, BA, BG, Reservoirs Silurian-Cretaceous (MD, RO, Lower Danube Green Corridor and HR, CZ, DE, Iron Gate I and UA), Q,N1-2,Pg2-3,Cr2 (RO, UA), Delta Wetlands (BG, MD, RO, UA) HU, MD, ME, Iron Gate II, Dobrudja/Dobrogea Neogene- RO, RS, SI, Lake Neusiedl Sarmatian (BG-RO), Dobrudja/ CH, UA Dobrogea Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous (BG-RO), South Western Backa/Dunav aquifer (RS, HR), Northeast Backa/ Danube -Tisza Interfluve or Backa/Danube-Tisza Interfluve aquifer (RS, HU), Podunajska Basin, Zitny Ostrov/Szigetköz, Hanság-Rábca (HU), Komarnanska Vysoka Kryha/Dunántúli – középhegység északi rész (HU) - Lech Danube AT, DE - Inn Danube AT, DE, IT, CH - Morava Danube AT, CZ, SK Floodplains of the Morava- Dyje-Danube Confluence --Dyje Morava AT, CZ - Raab/Rába Danube AT, HU Rába shallow aquifer, Rába porous cold and thermal aquifer, Rába Kőszeg mountain fractured aquifer, Günser Gebirge Umland, Günstal, Hügelland Raab Ost, Hügelland Raab West, Hügelland Rabnitz, Lafnitztal, Pinkatal 1, Pinkatal 2, Raabtal,
    [Show full text]
  • Europe Disclaimer
    World Small Hydropower Development Report 2019 Europe Disclaimer Copyright © 2019 by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization and the International Center on Small Hydro Power. The World Small Hydropower Development Report 2019 is jointly produced by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) and the International Center on Small Hydro Power (ICSHP) to provide development information about small hydropower. The opinions, statistical data and estimates contained in signed articles are the responsibility of the authors and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or bearing the endorsement of UNIDO or ICSHP. Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information herein, neither UNIDO, its Member States nor ICSHP assume any responsibility for consequences that may arise from the use of the material. This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as ‘developed’, ‘industrialized’ and ‘developing’ are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. This document may be freely quoted or reprinted but acknowledgement is requested.
    [Show full text]
  • (Eni/2016/372-403) the Danube, Prut and Black Sea
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership cOUNTRIES (ENI/2016/372-403) THE DANUBE, PRUT AND BLACK SEA RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN IN REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA for the future planning cycle (2022-2027) TECHNICAL REPORT N°6 ON ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF WATER USE December – 2019 Technical Report N°6 Economical analysis of water use Beneficiaries IWRM department of the MARDE (legislation and supervision), Agency “Apele Moldovei” (Planning coordination and follow up of implementation) Produced by OIKUMENA Public Association Authors Petru Bacal, Iurie Bejan, Vitalie Dilan, Lucia Căpățînă, Nicolae Boboc, Boris Iurciuc, Natalia Zgîrcu Produced for: International Office for Water (France), as contracting authority responsible for RBM planning in EUWI+East member state consortium Supervision Radu Cazacu and Dumitru Proca from Apele Moldovei supported by Pierre Henry de Villeneuve (IOWater) and Victor Bujac (National EUWI+ Project Representative in Moldova) Date December 2019 Version Final Acknowledgements: Apele Romane for offering its support including the direct contribution of Irina Tutunaru from Water Administration Prut – Barlad River Basin, Romania Financed by: European Union Co-financed by: Austrian Development Agency and the Artois-Picardie Water Agency (France) for the implementing Member States Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document, the “TECHNICAL REPORT N°6 ON ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF WATER USE”, was produced by the EU member state consortium with the financial assistance of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Exceptional Floods in the Prut Basin, Romania, in the Context of Heavy Rains in the Summer of 2010
    Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 381–396, 2017 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/381/2017/ doi:10.5194/nhess-17-381-2017 © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Exceptional floods in the Prut basin, Romania, in the context of heavy rains in the summer of 2010 Gheorghe Romanescu and Cristian Constantin Stoleriu Faculty of Geography and Geology, Department of Geography, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Bd. Carol I, 20 A, 700505 Iasi, Romania Correspondence to: Gheorghe Romanescu (romanescugheorghe@gmail.com) Received: 30 August 2016 – Discussion started: 12 September 2016 Revised: 4 January 2017 – Accepted: 13 February 2017 – Published: 10 March 2017 Abstract. The year 2010 was characterized by devastating ina, and Montenegro (Bissolli et al., 2011; Szalinska et al., flooding in central and eastern Europe, including Romania, 2014) (Fig. 1). The strongest floods from 2010 were regis- the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. This tered in the Danube basin (see Table 1). For Romania, we study focuses on floods that occurred during the summer of underlined the floods from the basins of Prut, Siret, Moldova, 2010 in the Prut River basin, which has a high percentage and Bistri¸tarivers. The most devastating floods in Romania of hydrotechnical infrastructure. Strong floods occurred in occurred in Moldavia (Prut, Siret) and Transylvania (Tisa, eastern Romania on the Prut River, which borders the Re- Somes, Tarnave, Olt). The most deaths were recorded in public of Moldova and Ukraine, and the Siret River. Atmo- Poland (25), Romania (six on the Buhai River, a tributary spheric instability from 21 June to 1 July 2010 caused re- of the Jijia), Slovakia (three), Serbia (two), Hungary (two), markable amounts of rain, with rates of 51.2 mm/50 min and and the Czech Republic (two) (Romanescu and Stoleriu, 42.0 mm/30 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1 National Inventory of February 2003
    Support for the Extension of Accident Risk Spots Inventory and Preventive Measures / Final Report Annex 1 National Inventory of February 2003 Support for the Extension of Accident Risk Spots Inventory and Preventive Measures / Final Report 1 Annex 1 A 1.1 OCS in Austria 2 UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project Result of the existing Federal Inventory of Contaminated Sites (FCSI) Austria This inventory was compiled and managed by the Federal Environment Agency of Austria served as the basis for the closer definition of contaminated sites in flooding areas. By 1 July 2002 the FCSI included 164 sites. From these total number those sites were excluded which meet one of the defined exclusion criteria from the expert meeting in 2002. As the result of this exclusion process 29 sites involving a significant high potential of contaminants were retained for the inventory of contaminated sites in flooding areas. However, it has to be taken into account that at some of these sites remediation measures have already been started and the contamination potential will hence decrease significantly in the future. Regular updating of the inventory for contaminated sites in flooding areas should therefore be introduced compulsorily. Bundesland Nummer Bezeichnung Bezirk Gemeinde Art der Altlast Art der Schadstoffe Fläche Volumen Branche Ablagerungs- Ablagerungen /Betriebszeitra um Kärnten K22 Lederfabrik Neuner Klagenfurt Klagenfurt Altstandort Chrom 120000 Lederverarbeitu seit 1922 ng Kärnten K7 Deponie Roßwiese Sankt Veit an Althofen Altablagerung Industriemüll
    [Show full text]
  • National Reviews 1998 Moldova Technical Reports
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 MOLDOVA TECHNICAL REPORTS Part A: Social and Economic Analysis Part B: Financing Mechanisms NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 MOLDOVA TECHNICAL REPORTS Part A: Social and Economic Analysis Part B: Financing Mechanisms NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants.
    [Show full text]