<<

Domino theory From Academic Kids

The was the idea that if one key nation in a region ​ ​ came under the control of communists, others would follow like toppling dominoes. The theory was used by many ​ leaders during the to justify U.S. intervention in the ​ ​ ​ War. The "domino theory" was applied by President Dwight D. ​ ​ Eisenhower and his top advisers in 1954 to describe the prospects of ​ ​ ​ 'communist expansion' in if Indochina were to fall.' ​ ​ Background The "Domino Theory" was first espoused by name by President Eisenhower in an , 1954 news conference[1], and was originally ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ applied to Indochina, which includes Vietnam. If Communists ​ ​ succeeded in Indochina, Eisenhower argued, they would then successively take over Burma, Thailand, and Indonesia. This would ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ give them a geographically strategic advantage, from which they would be able to win in , Formosa, the , , ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ and . ​ ​ The "domino theory" was expounded periodically since 1954 by top U.S. leaders who used it as a justification for expanding military programs throughout the world. The Johnson administration ​ ​ intervened in the latter half of the 1960s with over one-half million troops to keep that "domino" from falling. Controversy Supporters of the "domino theory" argued that a communist victory would mean that U.S. alliance guarantees for other small nations would no longer be credible, and a series of communist victories could be expected. Critics of the theory charged that the Indochinese wars were largely indigenous in nature, that no such monolithic force as "world " existed, and that the theory was used as a scare tactic to try to justify unwarranted intervention policies. In the 1980s, the "domino theory" was used to justify the Reagan administration's interventions in Central America and the ​ Caribbean region.