North America: Time for a New Focus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

North America: Time for a New Focus North America: Focus a New Time for The Council on Foreign Relations sponsors Independent Task Forces to assess issues of current and critical importance to U.S. foreign policy and provide policymakers with concrete judgments and recommendations. Diverse in backgrounds and perspectives, Task Force members aim to reach a meaningful consensus on policy through private and nonpartisan deliberations. Once launched, Task Forces are independent of CFR and solely responsible for the content of their reports. Task Force members are asked to join a consensus signifying that they endorse “the general policy thrust and judgments reached by the group, though not necessarily every finding and recommendation.” Each Task Force member also has the option of putting forward an additional or a dissenting view. Members’ affiliations are listed for identification purposes only and do not imply institutional endorsement. Task Force observers participate in discussions, but are not asked to join the consensus. Task Force Members Bernard W. Aronson Jane Holl Lute ACON Investments Council on CyberSecurity Jodi Hanson Bond Jason Marczak U.S. Chamber of Commerce Atlantic Council Robert C. Bonner Diana Natalicio The Sentinel HS Group, LLC University of Texas at El Paso Jason Eric Bordoff Shannon K. O’Neil Columbia University Council on Foreign Relations Timothy P. Daly Maria Otero Western Union Independent Consulting Jorge I. Dominguez James W. Owens Harvard University Caterpillar Inc. Stephen E. Flynn David H. Petraeus Northeastern University KKR Global Institute Gordon D. Giffin Adrean Scheid Rothkopf McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP Millicom Neal R. Goins Clifford M. Sobel Independent Task Force Report No. 71 Exxon Mobil Corporation Valor Capital Group No. 71 Report Force Task Independent Kenneth I. Juster James S. Taylor Warburg Pincus LLC Vianovo David H. Petraeus and Robert B. Zoellick, Chairs Marie-Josée Kravis Robert B. Zoellick Shannon K. O’Neil, Project Director Hudson Institute Goldman Sachs & Co. North America www.cfr.org Time for a New Focus North America Time for a New Focus Independent Task Force Report No. 71 David H. Petraeus and Robert B. Zoellick, Chairs Shannon K. O’Neil, Project Director North America Time for a New Focus The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business execu- tives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; con- vening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with CFR members to discuss and debate major international issues; supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to-date information and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, www.cfr.org. The Council on Foreign Relations takes no institutional positions on policy issues and has no affiliation with the U.S. government. All views expressed in its publications and on its website are the sole responsibil- ity of the author or authors. The Council on Foreign Relations sponsors Independent Task Forces to assess issues of current and critical importance to U.S. foreign policy and provide policymakers with concrete judgments and recommenda- tions. Diverse in backgrounds and perspectives, Task Force members aim to reach a meaningful consensus on policy through private and nonpartisan deliberations. Once launched, Task Forces are independent of CFR and solely responsible for the content of their reports. Task Force members are asked to join a consen- sus signifying that they endorse ‘‘the general policy thrust and judgments reached by the group, though not necessarily every finding and recommendation.’’ Each Task Force member also has the option of putting forward an additional or dissenting view. Members’ affiliations are listed for identification purposes only and do not imply institutional endorsement. Task Force observers participate in discussions, but are not asked to join the consensus. For further information about CFR or this Task Force, please write to the Council on Foreign Relations, 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, or call the Communications office at 212.434.9888. Visit CFR’s website at www.cfr.org. Copyright © 2014 by the Council on Foreign Relations®, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This report may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form beyond the reproduction permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law Act (17 U.S.C. Sections 107 and 108) and excerpts by reviewers for the public press, without express written permission from the Council on Foreign Relations. This report is printed on paper that is FSC® Chain-of-Custody Certified by a printer who is certified by BM TRADA North America Inc. Task Force Members Task Force members are asked to join a consensus signifying that they endorse “the general policy thrust and judgments reached by the group, though not necessarily every finding and recommendation.” They par- ticipate in the Task Force in their individual, not institutional, capacities. Bernard W. Aronson Kenneth I. Juster ACON Investments Warburg Pincus LLC Jodi Hanson Bond Marie-Josée Kravis U.S. Chamber of Commerce Hudson Institute Robert C. Bonner* Jane Holl Lute Sentinel HS Group, LLC Council on CyberSecurity Jason Eric Bordoff* Jason Marczak Columbia University Atlantic Council Timothy P. Daly Diana Natalicio Western Union University of Texas at El Paso Jorge I. Domínguez Shannon K. O’Neil Harvard University Council on Foreign Relations Stephen E. Flynn Maria Otero* Northeastern University Independent Consulting Gordon D. Giffin James W. Owens McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP Caterpillar Inc. Neal R. Goins David H. Petraeus Exxon Mobil Corporation KKR Global Institute *The individual has endorsed the report and signed an additional or dissenting view. v vi Task Force Members Adrean Scheid Rothkopf James S. Taylor Millicom Vianovo Clifford M. Sobel Robert B. Zoellick Valor Capital Group Goldman Sachs & Co. This report is dedicated to the memory of Task Force member Robert A. Pastor, a visionary champion of the North American idea, who passed away during the course of this effort. vii Contents Foreword xi Acknowledgments xiii Acronyms xv Task Force Report 1 Executive Summary 3 Introduction: The Importance of North America 8 North American Energy Interdependence 15 North American Economic Competitiveness 29 North American Security 42 North American Community 51 Recommendations 62 Conclusion: The New World of North America 82 Additional or Dissenting Views 83 Endnotes 86 Task Force Members 96 Task Force Observers 107 Foreword The United States, Canada, and Mexico are bound by a shared geogra- phy, history, and environment. In the twenty years since the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement, the continent’s three econ- omies and societies have become deeply intertwined, making relations between the United States and its immediate neighbors more impor- tant than ever. In 2005, in conjunction with counterpart organizations in Canada and Mexico, the Council on Foreign Relations published Building a North American Community, which proposed the establishment of a North American economic and security community by 2010, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter. Nearly a decade since the report’s release, its bold vision is still mostly a distant goal. Many of the issues facing North American policymakers in 2005 remain: growing global economic competition, uneven development within North America, and threats to mutual security. New and wel- come trends have also emerged, however: significant increases in energy production in the United States and Canada, an increasingly confident Mexico bolstered by political and economic reforms, and a decline in migration from Mexico to its northern neighbors. This report of the CFR-sponsored Independent Task Force on North America examines both the long-standing issues facing the region and more recent developments, urging policymakers to elevate and priori- tize the North American relationship. The Task Force’s recommendations focus on four pivotal areas: cap- italizing on North America’s promising energy outlook by removing restrictions on energy exports and increasing investment in infrastruc- ture; bolstering economic competitiveness through the freer movement of goods and services across borders; strengthening security through a unified continental strategy and support for Mexico’s efforts to solidify xi xii Foreword democratic rule of law; and
Recommended publications
  • State Department Reform
    State Department Reform Report of an Independent Task Force Cosponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations and the Center for Strategic and International Studies Frank C. Carlucci, Chair Ian J. Brzezinski, Project Coordinator The Council on Foreign Relations, Inc., a nonprofit, nonpartisan national orga- nization founded in 1921, is dedicated to promoting understanding of international affairs through the free and civil exchange of ideas. The Council’s members are dedicated to the belief that America’s peace and prosperity are firmly linked to that of the world. From this flows the mission of the Council: to foster America’s understanding of other nations—their peoples, cul- tures, histories, hopes, quarrels, and ambitions—and thus to serve our nation through study and debate, private and public. THE COUNCIL TAKES NO INSTITUTIONAL POSITION ON POLICY ISSUES AND HAS NO AFFILIATION WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. ALL STATEMENTS OF FACT AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION CONTAINED IN ALL ITS PUBLI- CATIONS ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR OR AUTHORS. The Council will sponsor an Independent Task Force when (1) an issue of current and critical importance to U.S. foreign policy arises, and (2) it seems that a group diverse in backgrounds and perspectives may, nonetheless, be able to reach a meaningful consensus on a policy through private and nonpartisan deliberations. Typically, a Task Force meets between two and five times over a brief period to ensure the relevance of its work. Upon reaching a conclusion, a Task Force issues a report, and the Council publishes its text and posts it on the Council website.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2015
    INSIDE: Experts analyze efforts of Ukraine’s new prosecutor – page 3 Congressional delegation meets with Poroshenko – page 4 Special section: Ukrainian Debutante Balls – pages 9-11 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXXIII No. 12 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MARCH 22, 2015 $2.00 Senate Foreign Relations Committee Ukraine’s minister of fi nance visits hears testimony on Ukraine policy D.C. to seek assistance for Ukraine Appearing on the first panel were Victoria Nuland, assistant secretary of state Frustration mounts for European and Eurasian affairs; Vice as Obama declines Admiral Frank Pandolfe, director for strate- gic plans and policy for the Joint Staff to provide lethal aid Pentagon; Brian P. McKeon, principal depu- ty undersecretary of defense for policy; and Ukrainian National Information Service Ramin Toloui, assistant secretary of trea- sury for international finance. WASHINGTON – The chairman of the Despite arguing that Ukraine figures Senate Foreign Relations Committee prominently in U.S. strategy in Europe and (SFRC), Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), called recounting the ways in which the U.S. is into session two panels to hear testimony offering economic support to Ukraine, the on President Barack Obama’s policy toward panelists did not say the U.S. is prepared to Ukraine to repel Russian aggression and offer Ukraine military assistance. It was push reform. Word of the president’s state- clear that the administration’s objective is ment in diplomatic channels in February to affect Russian behavior by diplomatic that his administration will not offer mili- means, which includes imposing sanctions tary assistance to Ukraine was the back- that will hurt Russia economically.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, January 2013
    PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION JANUARY 2013 DIPLOMACY IN A TIME OF SCARCITY FOREIGN SERVICE TRANSFER TIPS FACING THE UNTHINKABLE FOREIGN January 2013 SERVICE Volume 90, No. 1 AFSA NEWS Sec. Clinton Joins in Celebrating GLIFAA’s 20th Anniversary / 43 SPECIAL State VP Voice: Diplomacy in a Time of Scarcity / 29 Protecting Privacy / 44 In spite of real progress since 2008, our foreign affairs agencies are not USAID VP Voice: Links in the yet completely staffed, rt ained and deployed to meet the challenges of the Field AFSA Post Reps / 45 21st century. Here are highlights of the American Academy of Diplomacy’s 2012-2013 AFSA Financial Aid recommendations, from their latest report. Scholarship Recipients / 46 AFSA Screens “ARGO” to a Full House / 51 FOCUS FOREIGN SERVICE TRANSFER TIPS Secretary of State Awards Editor’s Introduction / 23 Recognize Overseas We hope our coverage will help your next transfer go more smoothly. Volunteers / 52 BY STEVEN ALAN HONLEY Dissent: About National Interest, Not Individual Views / 53 Foreign Service Transfer Realities / 24 A Bengali Woman’s Art: Cause for Liberation / 54 As with all aspects of an FS career, it is crucial to take charge of a move. You are your own best advocate. Caroling Friends of the FS BY METTE BEECROFT Hold Climate Change Talk / 55 Trust Invites FS Project Single, With Pets / 28 Proposals / 55 Traveling with animals overseas can present unique challenges. Nicholas Kralev Introduces But with careful preparation, it can also be very rewarding. “America’s Other Army” / 56 BY HEATHER PISHKO Senior Living Foundation: Supporting Retired FS Members / 57 FEATURE COLUMNS The Millennium Challenge Corporation: President’s Views / 7 Off to a Good Start / 35 AFSA Needs Strong Leaders Eight years after the MCC’s creation, the verdict on its efforts to jump-start BY SUSAN R.
    [Show full text]
  • EU China Agreement
    MARCH 2021 EU China agreement Alert Clingendael A sign of European geopolitical awakening* Luuk van Middelaar © Council of the European Union The images of an incited mob laying siege as “this is not America”. This attempted to the US Capitol will remain etched in our coup d’état was driven by many underlying minds for a very long time to come – in the dynamics that have been burgeoning in United States, of course, but also in the rest the US for several years now, including of the world. conspiracy theories, glorification of secessionist idols, and social and racial The Washington events of 6 January 2021 chasms. The reality TV star turned president cannot be regarded as merely the last gasp in 2016 was a symptom of this decline, not of Donald Trump’s term, nor dismissed its cause. with charitable but hollow statements such In the rest of the world, we took note of this downward spiral earlier and with more * Originally published in Le Grand Continent as clarity. It was therefore fascinating to see “Accord UE-Chine : l’Amérique est-elle encore en the US intellectual elite witness these events position de redevenir le leader du monde libre ?”, with stupefaction. Richard N. Haass of the on 12 January 2021. Council on Foreign Relations, the dean of Clingendael Alert US foreign policy circles, wrote right after with Xi Jinping, the Chinese president. the Capitol events on Twitter: “No one in the The agreement gives European companies world is likely to see, respect, fear, or depend better access and protection on Chinese on us in the same way again.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, January 2013
    PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION JANUARY 2013 DIPLOMACY IN A TIME OF SCARCITY FOREIGN SERVICE TRANSFER TIPS FACING THE UNTHINKABLE FOREIGN January 2013 SERVICE Volume 90, No. 1 AFSA NEWS Sec. Clinton Joins in Celebrating GLIFAA’s 20th Anniversary / 43 SPECIAL State VP Voice: Diplomacy in a Time of Scarcity / 29 Protecting Privacy / 44 In spite of real progress since 2008, our foreign affairs agencies are not USAID VP Voice: Links in the yet completely staffed, rt ained and deployed to meet the challenges of the Field AFSA Post Reps / 45 21st century. Here are highlights of the American Academy of Diplomacy’s 2012-2013 AFSA Financial Aid recommendations, from their latest report. Scholarship Recipients / 46 AFSA Screens “ARGO” to a Full House / 51 FOCUS FOREIGN SERVICE TRANSFER TIPS Secretary of State Awards Editor’s Introduction / 23 Recognize Overseas We hope our coverage will help your next transfer go more smoothly. Volunteers / 52 BY STEVEN ALAN HONLEY Dissent: About National Interest, Not Individual Views / 53 Foreign Service Transfer Realities / 24 A Bengali Woman’s Art: Cause for Liberation / 54 As with all aspects of an FS career, it is crucial to take charge of a move. You are your own best advocate. Caroling Friends of the FS BY METTE BEECROFT Hold Climate Change Talk / 55 Trust Invites FS Project Single, With Pets / 28 Proposals / 55 Traveling with animals overseas can present unique challenges. Nicholas Kralev Introduces But with careful preparation, it can also be very rewarding. “America’s Other Army” / 56 BY HEATHER PISHKO Senior Living Foundation: Supporting Retired FS Members / 57 FEATURE COLUMNS The Millennium Challenge Corporation: President’s Views / 7 Off to a Good Start / 35 AFSA Needs Strong Leaders Eight years after the MCC’s creation, the verdict on its efforts to jump-start BY SUSAN R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brookings Institution
    1 TRANSATLANTIC-2015/01/27 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION UNITY IN CHALLENGING TIMES: BUILDING ON TRANSATLANTIC RESOLVE AN ADDRESS BY AMBASSADOR VICTORIA NULAND, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EUROPE AND EURASIA Washington, D.C. Tuesday, January 27, 2015 PARTICIPANTS: Introduction and Moderator: FIONA HILL Senior Fellow and Director, Center on the United States and Europe The Brookings Institution Featured Speaker: VICTORIA NULAND Assistant Secretary for Europe and Eurasia U.S. Department of State * * * * * ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 2 TRANSATLANTIC-2015/01/27 P R O C E E D I N G S MS. HILL: Ladies and gentleman, sorry about the delay. As you can all appreciate the traffic is a little difficult this morning with our not so great amount of snow. At least our guest was not coming from New York or Boston. Then, otherwise, I guess we'd be rescheduling entirely. But we're really delighted today to see so many of you turnout for what is sure to be a very important presentation and discussion with the Assistant Secretary for Europe, Victoria Nuland. Victoria Nuland is one of our most distinguished public servants and diplomats. I don't think she really needs any introduction to his audience here, but nonetheless, I think certainly a review of some of her accomplishments is in order. She's been the spokesman for the State Department, our Ambassador to NATO. She's also been Senior Advisor to the Vice President of the United States. She's served in the embassy in Moscow.
    [Show full text]
  • August 31, 2021 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
    August 31, 2021 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL - [email protected] Kellie Robinson, Public Liaison U. S. Department of State A/GIS/IPS/PP 2201 C Street N.W., Suite B266 Washington, D. C. 20520-0000 Freedom of Information Act Request: Evacuations from Afghanistan. Dear FOIA Officer: America First Legal Foundation (“AFL”) is a national, nonprofit organization. AFL works to promote the rule of law in the United States, prevent executive overreach, ensure due process and equal protection for all Americans, and promote knowledge and understanding of the law and individual rights guaranteed under the Constitu- tion and laws of the United States. I. Introduction For months, the Biden Administration assured Americans it had matters well in hand in Afghanistan, and that the terrorists were not about to take over. For example, at President Biden’s July 8, 2021, press conference, he said: Q. Is a Taliban takeover of Afghanistan now inevitable? THE PRESIDENT: No, it is not. Q. Why? THE PRESIDENT: Because you — the Afghan troops have 300,000 well- equipped — as well-equipped as any army in the world — and an air force against something like 75,000 Taliban. It is not inevitable. * * * * Q. Mr. President, thank you very much. Your own intelligence commu- nity has assessed that the Afghan government will likely collapse. THE PRESIDENT: That is not true. 1 These assurances were false.2 The Taliban is now in control, and the United States has completely withdrawn its military and diplomatic presence from Afghanistan. The Biden government claims to have evacuated over 120,000 individuals from Afghanistan, but its planning has been inept, its execution chaotic, and its reporting and transparency lacking in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of a National Security Fiasco: the George W. Bush Administration, Iraq, and Groupthink Phillip G
    Anatomy of a National Security Fiasco: The George W. Bush Administration, Iraq, and Groupthink Phillip G. Henderson The Catholic University of America These were people who were selectively picking and then emphasizing pieces of intelligence, I believe, in order to support their larger purpose, which was to bring in a way that they thought possible, to bring democracy to Iraq, and through Iraq to transform the Middle East. I thought that was far-fetched. I didn’t think it was going to happen, but that was their real purpose. They thought that this was going to be a transforming event in history. My frustration is that there was never a national security decision- making process in the administration where people such as me really had a chance to take that on. Richard Haass, Director of Policy Planning at the State Department 2001-2003, Interview with Chris Matthews on “Hardball,” May 6, 2009 In February 2002, one year before the U.S. military intervention in Iraq began, neoconservative writer Ken Adelman predicted that demolishing Saddam Hussein’s regime and liberating Iraq would be a “cakewalk.”1 At a town hall meeting at the Ameri- PHILLIP G. HENDERSON is Associate Professor of Politics at The Catholic University of America. Work on this article was supported by a research grant from the Center for the Study of Statesmanship. 1 Ken Adelman, “Cakewalk in Iraq,” The Washington Post, 13 February 2002, A27. 46 • Volume XXXI, Nos. 1 and 2, 2018 Phillip G. Henderson can air base in Aviano, Italy, on February 7, 2003, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld added that, if force were to be used in Iraq, the war “could last six days, six weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO: Response to the Crisis in Ukraine and Security Concerns in Central and Eastern Europe
    NATO: Response to the Crisis in Ukraine and Security Concerns in Central and Eastern Europe Paul Belkin, Coordinator Analyst in European Affairs Derek E. Mix Analyst in European Affairs Steven Woehrel Specialist in European Affairs July 31, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43478 NATO: Response to the Crisis in Ukraine Summary Russia’s actions in Ukraine and its alleged role in the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 have caused observers and policy makers on both sides of the Atlantic, including Members of Congress, to reassess the role of the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in upholding European security. The security concerns of NATO’s Central and Eastern European member states and non-NATO member states such as Moldova and Ukraine are of particular concern. NATO has strongly condemned Russian actions in Ukraine and has taken steps aimed both at reassuring allies and partners in Central and Eastern Europe and at deterring further Russian aggression. These include demonstrations of support for Ukraine and its territorial integrity; actions to demonstrate NATO’s commitment to defending Central and Eastern European allies; and measures aimed at rebuking Russia. NATO members have said they will continue to conduct previously planned military exercises in Ukraine and elsewhere in the region. The United States has been a key driver of the NATO response and has taken additional military measures intended to reassure its allies and partners in Central and Eastern Europe. These include the deployment of U.S. fighter jets and 600 paratroopers to Poland and the Baltic states, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Telephone Directory
    United States Department of State Telephone Directory This customized report includes the following section(s): Organizational Directory Diplomats in Residence 1/17/2012 Provided by The Office of Global Publishing Solutions, A/ISS/GPS Cover UNCLASSIFIED Organizational Directory United States Department of State 2201 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20520 Office of the Secretary (S) Senior Watch Officer (24 Hours Per Day) 7516 202-647-1512 Editor (24 Hours Per Day) Editor 7516 202-647-1512 Secretary The Watch (24 Hours Per Day) The Watch (24 202-647-1512 Secretary Hillary Clinton 7th Floor 202-647-5291 Hours Per Day) 7516 Office Manager Claire Coleman 7226 202-647-7098 Crisis Management Staff 7516 202-647-7640 Counselor and Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills 7226 202-647-5548 Emergency and Evacuations Planning 7516 202-647-7640 Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations Huma Abedin 202-647-5601 Emergency Relocation 7516 202-647-7640 7226 Military Representative Lt. Col. Paul Matier 7516 202-647-6097 Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Jacob Sullivan 7226 202-647-2972 Scheduling Lona Valmoro 7226 202-647-9071 Office of the Executive Director (S/ES-EX) Scheduling Linda Dewan 7226 202-647-5733 Executive Director, Deputy Executive Secretary 202-647-7457 Executive Assistant Alice Wells 7226 202-647-9572 Tulinabo S. Mushingi 7507 Special Assistant Nima Abbaszadeh 7226 202-647-9573 Deputy Executive Director Mark R. Brandt 7507 202-647-5467 Special Assistant Bernadette Meehan 7226 202-647-6822 Personnel Officer Cynthia J. Motley 7515 202-647-5638 Staff Assistant Rob Russo 7226 202-647-5298 Budget Officer Reginald J.
    [Show full text]
  • Interdisciplinary Journal of the William J. Perry Center for Hemispheric
    Interdisciplinary Journal of the William J. Perry Volume 14 2013 Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies ISSN: 1533-2535 Special Issue: The Drug Policy Debate FOREIGN POLICY AND SECURITY ISSUES THE DRUG POLICY DEBATE Michael Kryzanek, China, United States, and Latin A Selection of Brief Essays Representing America: Challenges and Opportunities the Diversity of Opinion, Contributors: Marilyn Quagliotti, Timothy Lynch, Hilton McDavid and Noel M. Cowell, A Peter Hakim (with Kimberly Covington), Perspective on Cutting Edge Research for Crime and Craig Deare, AMB Adam Blackwell, and Security Policies and Programs in the Caribbean General (ret.) Barry McCaffrey Tyrone James, The Growth of the Private Security Industry in Barbados: A Case Study BOOK REVIEWS Phil Kelly, A Geopolitical Interpretation of Security Joseph Barron: Review of Max Boot, Concerns within United States–Latin American Invisible Armies: An Epic History of Relations Guerrilla Warfare from Ancient Times to the Present Emily Bushman: Review of Mark FOCUS ON BRAZIL Schuller, Killing With Kindness: Haiti, Myles Frechette and Frank Samolis, A Tentative International Aid, and NGOs Embrace: Brazil’s Foreign and Trade Relations with Philip Cofone: Review of Gastón Fornés the United States and Alan Butt Philip, The China–Latin Salvador Raza, Brazil’s Border Security Systems America Axis: Emerging Markets and the Initiative: A Transformative Endeavor in Force Future of Globalisation Design Cole Gibson: Review of Rory Carroll, Shênia K. de Lima, Estratégia Nacional de Defesa Comandante:
    [Show full text]
  • Wetenschappelijke Verhandeling Ontwikkelingen in De Publieke Diplomatie Door Gebruik Van Sociale Media
    UNIVERSITEIT GENT FACULTEIT POLITIEKE EN SOCIALE WETENSCHAPPEN Ontwikkelingen in de publieke diplomatie door gebruik van sociale media. Een toetsingsonderzoek naar de invloed van Twitter op de publieke diplomatie in de Verenigde Staten. Wetenschappelijke verhandeling Aantal woorden: 24.567 ANNELORE RAMAN MASTERPROEF POLITIEKE WETENSCHAPPEN afstudeerrichting INTERNATIONALE POLITIEK PROMOTOR: PROF. DR. RIK COOLSAET COMMISSARIS: JENNIFER KESTELEYN COMMISSARIS: MELANIE VAN MEIRVENNE ACADEMIEJAAR 2012 – 2013 Voorwoord In dit voorwoord wil graag mijn promotor Dr. Prof. Rik Coolsaet en mevr. Jennifer Kesteleyn danken om mij dit boeiend onderwerp toe te vertrouwen. Tijdens mijn studies Internationale Politiek heb ik steeds bijzondere aandacht gehad voor hoe de beeldvorming van internationale conflicten en het imago van staten vorm krijgt. Dat ik vanuit deze interesse een masterproef mocht schrijven, was een extra motivatie om mij in het onderwerp van de publieke diplomatie te verdiepen. Bedankt aan Jennifer Kesteleyn voor de nuttige feedback. Daarnaast ook een dankwoord voor de inbreng van mijn ouders. Zij stonden telkens klaar om mij te steunen in een periode die, om diverse redenen, zwaarder uitviel dan verwacht. Een extra woordje van dank aan mijn mama, die zich ontfermde over de taalkundige oneffenheden in mijn masterproef. 2 Abstract Deze masterproef geeft een overzicht van de recente ontwikkelingen binnen de publieke diplomatie en focust op een shift in de werking van publieke diplomatie onder invloed van sociale media. Er wordt gesteld dat de publieke diplomatie evolueert naar een nieuwe beoefening die kadert onder de term ‘nieuwe publieke diplomatie’. Het model van de nieuwe publieke diplomatie gebruikt sociale media om de dialoog te versterken met burgers en niet-statelijke actoren, om organisaties met elkaar in contact te brengen en bijgevolg het imago van staten te laten bepalen door statelijke en niet-statelijke actoren (Melissen, 2005).
    [Show full text]