DOCSLIB.ORG

Dinner Debate Report: Applying Lessons from Afghanistan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dinner Debate Report: Applying Lessons from Afghanistan A Press Dinner with SACEUR General John Craddock Applying Lessons from Afghanistan: Actions and Outcomes Bibliothèque Solvay, Brussels SECURITY & DEFENCE AGENDA A Security & Defence Agenda Report Rapporteur: Julian Hale Photos: David Plas Year of publication: 2007 SECURITY & DEFENCE AGENDA Bibliothèque Solvay, Parc Léopold, 137 rue Belliard, B-1040, Brussels, Belgium T: +32 (0)2 737 91 48 F: +32 (0)2 736 32 16 E: [email protected] W: www.securitydefenceagenda.org SECURITY & DEFENCE AGENDA Contents Executive Summary 4 SACEUR’s General John Craddock—opening remarks 7 The Q&A Session 9 Can the insurgents be militarily defeated? 9 Can the gaps in NATO shortfalls be plugged? 10 What can NATO do to tackle the narcotics trade in Afghanistan? 11 The role of the international community 12 NATO planning—the longer term 13 List of participants 16 About the SDA 18 Page 3 SECURITY & DEFENCE AGENDA Applying Lessons from Afghanistan: Actions and Outcomes concerned, he feels that this is slow in Executive summary coming but says NATO is coming up with hand-me-down weapons and gear even if there are sometimes delays in Afghanistan: We cannot fail finding money to ship the equipment. As regards to the police force, the re- Supreme Allied Commander for duction in the pay gap between soldiers Europe (SACEUR) General Craddock and the police is one measure that has sees Afghanistan as a “very complex been taken. In addition, a US police situation” in which the international training mission which is to start imme- community “cannot fail”1 and that diately, will focus on equipment and NATO’s aim is to create the conditions training opportunities to develop Af- to allow Afghans to rebuild their coun- ghan forces rather like a gendarmerie. try. For him, the situation is improving but it is still a race against time to get the Afghan army and police trained and Making the Taliban irrelevant in a position to take over from NATO. The government needs to put in place Craddock feels that it is not so much domestic institutions and good govern- about defeating the Taliban as making ance that Afghans have confidence in. them irrelevant and that they would become so if people trust the govern- He is optimistic that the Afghan secu- ment to deliver social and welfare ser- rity forces will be able to take over re- vices to the people. Positive develop- sponsibilities in the next few years. ments including more and more chil- dren in schools rather than Madrasahs where they are taught about extrem- Afghan army and police ism, and practical projects such as road construction or hydroelectric power Craddock says that NATO would like systems, are carried out by NATO to have greater involvement of Muslim provincial reconstruction teams. In nations and hopes that North African terms of reconstruction, he believes and Middle Eastern countries will pro- that the tendency to lead with the mili- vide teams of military experts as part of tary operation and then consider the a growing programme to train Afghan reconstruction only afterwards needs military units. “They are interested,” he to inverted. said. “We're going to send a team down to Egypt very shortly, so I think there's some possibilities here.” He noted that NATO regional headquar- Counter-narcotics support ters will be establishing coordination Although NATO does support Afghani- centres to ensure that there is coordi- stan counter-narcotics forces with lo- nation between the International Secu- gistical support, it does not have a man- rity Assistance Force (ISAF) and the date for drug eradication and would Afghan army once the latter start car- need more resources to carry out such rying out autonomous operations. As a task. Progress has been made on re- far as equipping the Afghan army is Page 4 1 Quoting the NATO Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer. SECURITY & DEFENCE AGENDA A Press Dinner organised by the SDA in cooperation with the Hanns Seidel Stiftung ducing the amount of poppy cultivation Capability shortfalls in Afghanistan but there is still a long way to go. In his view, counter- In terms of capability shortfalls, he re- narcotics action must include some fused to name and shame countries and eradication, action against the leader- mentioned that there had been incre- ship of the trafficking networks and a mental improvements. However, he ban on the movement of drugs across argued that a clearly resourced NATO borders. sends a message that there is commit- ment to the success of the operation. His view was that every shortfall each soldier at a greater risk of being killed. Role of the international As regards ISAF protection for the EU community police mission in Afghanistan, Craddock stated that ISAF will always provide He stressed the important role played support for police outfits in extremis. by civilian actors from the international community in training government offi- cials, fighting corruption, fighting the narcotics trade and delivering eco- Measuring progress nomic infrastructure such as roads. He believes that success in Afghanistan Craddock also says that SHAPE should be judged on the delivery of a (Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers safe and secure environment and a bet- Europe) is developing one set of met- ter way of life for Afghans. In that rics to measure progress, for example sense, Craddock believes that that the on the extension of the Afghan govern- comprehensive approach is working ment’s authority across the country. better in some parts of the country He pointed out that measurements of than in others, that the provincial re- the effectiveness of actions needed to construction teams are working fairly be continually scrutinised and refined well but that there is room for im- and, for the longer term, that there provement in the long-term recon- would inevitably be lessons from Af- struction side of things, where interna- ghanistan for future operations. tional actors come into play. David Leakey, the Director General of the European Union Military Staff, agreed Deployable special operations with the General that there should be a metric strategy to measure the pro- Overstretch was a problem referred to gress of the international community by Herman Schaper, Ambassador of the across the board, that the international Delegation of the Netherlands to community should be engaged from day NATO. He also asked if, given that we one and that there should be Afghan are moving from a world of classical ownership alongside the international warfare to one where there is greater community’s efforts. need for counter-insurgency, there should be more focus on special forces and whether the remit of the military should be expanded, to include the role Page 5 SECURITY & DEFENCE AGENDA Applying Lessons from Afghanistan: Actions and Outcomes of a reconstruction worker. Craddock said that things were moving from a Cold War construct of big armies to one where it is about deployable spe- cial operations for different tasks. There was a need to catalogue “what we are doing”. Better long-term planning In terms of long-term planning, Craddock described the process of de- veloping capability packages in NATO as “an excruciating process” that needs to improve and that “we need to do more force planning informed what we are doing, not force planning as an end unto itself, its got to be informed by the real world; operations Active En- deavour, Kosovo, Afghanistan, training mission in Iraq. Informed by the reality of operations not informed by the doc- trines that we bring to the table in 26 different fashions”. Page 6 SECURITY & DEFENCE AGENDA A Press Dinner organised by the SDA in cooperation with the Hanns Seidel Stiftung tion, especially in the south and east of SACEUR General John Craddock – the country, as “difficult” but said that opening remarks “NATO has the upper hand right now with more ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) forces than a year ago and better capability”. He referred In his opening remarks, Supreme Allied to statistics from the Asia Foundation, Commander Europe (SACEUR) Gen- which showed that 90% of Afghans eral Craddock likened the roadmap for trust the Afghan national army. The Afghanistan to the complexity of the army is said to be well on the way to rules of cricket for American football reaching a target of 80,000 soldiers by fans. Although a humorous comment, the end of 2010 and is well over 50% in his point was clear - Afghanistan is an terms of retention rates. The SACEUR “extraordinary and very complex situa- said that the Afghan army is eager to tion” in which the international com- take on responsibility for security in munity “cannot fail”. He Afghanistan and highlighted pointed out that foreign sol- the importance of ‘OMLTs’ - diers would not be tolerated NATO operational mentoring indefinitely. In general terms, and liaison teams training he pointed to: forces embedded in the Af- ghan army. He described OMLTs as providing “the 1) the race against time to most important contribution meet challenges such as the NATO is making in providing Afghan security capacity taking security and stability in Af- over from NATO and the de- ghanistan” and being “our best velopment of domestic institu- investment in Afghanistan's tions and good governance; General John successful future”. Craddock 2) the importance of NATO SHAPE taking a long-term approach to the campaign; A comprehensive approach, including the international 3) the threat from opposition forces, community such as the Taliban but including other insurgents – “tribal warlords are for Craddock also stressed the need for the most part not organised but have a NATO and the international commu- common goal of preventing the democ- nity to continue to provide improve- ratically elected government of Afghani- ments in terms of the comprehensive stan from becoming the dominant gov- approach to Afghanistan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Members
    Special Committee on Terrorism Members Nathalie GRIESBECK Chair Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe France Mouvement Démocrate Elena VALENCIANO Vice-Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Spain Partido Socialista Obrero Español Judith SARGENTINI Vice-Chair Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Netherlands GroenLinks Jeroen LENAERS Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Netherlands Christen Democratisch Appèl Geoffrey VAN ORDEN Vice-Chair European Conservatives and Reformists Group United Kingdom Conservative Party Heinz K. BECKER Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Austria Österreichische Volkspartei Ivo BELET Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Belgium Christen-Democratisch & Vlaams Caterina CHINNICI Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Italy Partito Democratico Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Sweden Moderaterna Javier COUSO PERMUY Member Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left Spain Independiente 27/09/2021 1 Edward CZESAK Member European Conservatives and Reformists Group Poland Prawo i Sprawiedliwość Arnaud DANJEAN Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) France Les Républicains Gérard DEPREZ Member Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Belgium Mouvement Réformateur Agustín
    [Show full text]
  • ROMA and LUXEMBOURGERS There Are People Who Love And
    ROMA AND LUXEMBOURGERS There are people who love and people who hate Europe. I happen to be a fan. The European Union ended wars, queuing up for the customs and it gave a voice to even the smallest member-states, like Luxemburg with 500.000 residents. Yet millions of other EU citizens have no say in the matter, no Commissioner of their own and no MEPs in Brussels, for the mere reason that they are an ethnic minority, like Roma and Sinti, Europe's largest minority. Why double standards? Is it because Luxembourgers are all white and Roma all dark? They are not. Thousand years ago, Roma left India and went to Russia, Persia, Turkey and Europe. Some intermarried with Jews and other non-Roma, or they lost their tan in Scandinavian countries. Even the Nazis noticed that racial purity is a difficult thing. They decided that 12.5 % of Roma or Jewish blood was enough to be deported. Gadje, non-Roma, also have mixed blood. New archeological findings reveal that only 10 up to 20 % of Europeans descend from the original tribes, the others have DNA from the Middle East or Asia. The major difference between Luxembourgers and Roma does not stem from ethnicity but from something that used to be very important in Europe: borders. Luxembourgers have them, Roma don't. The political relevance of the term "ethnic minority" is rather dubious. It means counting people in, not seldom to count them out. The reunification of Europe has deprived a whole nation from fundamental rights and this mainly happened because the 12 million Roma, present in larger numbers than Belgians, Swedes, Finns, Bulgarians, Czechs, Greeks, Danish, or Luxembourgers, did not live together in their own nation-state.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Lords Official Report
    Vol. 789 Tuesday No. 96 20 February 2018 PARLIAMENTARYDEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDEROFBUSINESS List of Government and Principal Officers of the House .....................................................1 Black Rod Retirement of Lieutenant General David Leakey and introduction of Sarah Clarke ............1 Questions Charities, Social Enterprises and Voluntary Organisations................................................7 Commonwealth Summit ....................................................................................................9 Disabled People: Social Care............................................................................................12 Apprenticeships ................................................................................................................14 Automated and Electric Vehicles Bill Second Reading.................................................................................................................17 Northern Ireland Update Statement..........................................................................................................................40 Automated and Electric Vehicles Bill Second Reading (Continued) ............................................................................................52 Andrey Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun Freezing Order 2018 Motion to Approve ............................................................................................................69 Review of Post-18 Education and Funding Statement..........................................................................................................................75
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2014
    European Parliament Elections 2014 Updated 12 March 2014 Overview of Candidates in the United Kingdom Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 CANDIDATE SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................................................. 2 3.0 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS: VOTING METHOD IN THE UK ................................................................ 3 4.0 PRELIMINARY OVERVIEW OF CANDIDATES BY UK CONSTITUENCY ............................................ 3 5.0 ANNEX: LIST OF SITTING UK MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ................................ 16 6.0 ABOUT US ............................................................................................................................. 17 All images used in this briefing are © Barryob / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-3.0 / GFDL © DeHavilland EU Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. 1 | 18 European Parliament Elections 2014 1.0 Introduction This briefing is part of DeHavilland EU’s Foresight Report series on the 2014 European elections and provides a preliminary overview of the candidates standing in the UK for election to the European Parliament in 2014. In the United Kingdom, the election for the country’s 73 Members of the European Parliament will be held on Thursday 22 May 2014. The elections come at a crucial junction for UK-EU relations, and are likely to have far-reaching consequences for the UK’s relationship with the rest of Europe: a surge in support for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) could lead to a Britain that is increasingly dis-engaged from the EU policy-making process. In parallel, the current UK Government is also conducting a review of the EU’s powers and Prime Minister David Cameron has repeatedly pushed for a ‘repatriation’ of powers from the European to the national level. These long-term political developments aside, the elections will also have more direct and tangible consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members
    Subcommittee on Security and Defence Members Anna FOTYGA Chair European Conservatives and Reformists Group Poland Prawo i Sprawiedliwość Christian EHLER Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands Jaromír ŠTĚTINA Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Czechia TOP 09 a Starostové Clare MOODY Vice-Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament United Kingdom Labour Party Sabine LÖSING Vice-Chair Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left Germany DIE LINKE. Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Lithuania Tėvynės sąjunga-Lietuvos krikščionys demokratai Johannes Cornelis VAN BAALEN Member Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Netherlands Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie Brando BENIFEI Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Italy Partito Democratico Klaus BUCHNER Member Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Germany Ökologisch-Demokratische Partei Jerzy BUZEK Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Poland Platforma Obywatelska 30/09/2021 1 Aymeric CHAUPRADE Member Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group France Les Français Libres Javier COUSO PERMUY Member Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left Spain Independiente Arnaud DANJEAN Member Group of the European People's Party
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Eu Strategy for Collective Security
    THE TRANSATLANTIC SOLUTION FOR NATO AGS EADS · GALILEO AVIONICA · GENERAL DYNAMICS CANADA · INDRA · NORTHROP GRUMMAN · THALES TOWARDS AN EU STRATEGY FOR COLLECTIVE SECURITY With media support from An international one day conference organized by the New Defence Agenda, EADS, TIPS and the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. Towards an EU Strategy for Collective Security 3 February 2005, Palais d’Egmont, Brussels I am EADS My name is Aurora del Castillo. I’m in charge of Integrated Logistics Support for military aircraft at EADS CASA, the Spanish partner in the Eurofighter programme. A modern air force isn’t just aircraft, but a complex package of logistics services that range from pilot training and flight simulators to spare parts. My role is to liaise with senior officers from customers’ air forces, determine their needs and ensure these are fulfilled. I remain their key contact long after the aircraft has been delivered. I’m Spanish and European. I’m a woman in what is no longer a man’s world. I am EADS. www.eads.com AIRBUS EUROCOPTER EUROFIGHTER A400M METEOR GALILEO ARIANE The views expressed in this Report are personal opinions and not necessarily the views of the organisations they represent, nor of the New Defence Agenda, its members or sponsors. Contents Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted, providing that full attribution is made to the New Defence Agenda and INTRODUCTION 5 to the source(s) in question, and provided that any such reproduction, whether in whole or in part, is not sold unless Giles Merritt, Director, New Defence Agenda incorporated in other works.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Audit: European Elections 2019: What Will Happen in the East of England Region? Page 1 of 6
    Democratic Audit: European elections 2019: what will happen in the East of England region? Page 1 of 6 European elections 2019: what will happen in the East of England region? Traditionally this is a Conservative region at Westminster elections. Yet the East of England is strongly Eurosceptic and UKIP came top here in the last European Parliament elections in 2014, although the Tories hung on (just) to three seats. The Brexit Party now look certain to take over the UKIP vote and comfortably come first: on current polls they are guaranteed three of the region’s seven seats, and possibly one more. The latest polling indicates that Labour and the Liberal Democrats look assured of a single seat each. So the main uncertainty hangs on just how dominant the Brexit Party vote will be, whether the Tories’ slump means that they lose all of their seats here, and whether the Greens can pick up a seat. With voters able to cast only a single vote for a party list, the Democratic Audit team reviews likely outcomes for the parties and the main potentially electable candidates. Norwich cathedral. Picture: MemoryCatcher / 3041 images The East of England region juts into the North Sea and covers East Anglia down to the northern fringes of London. People here voted 56.5% to 43.5% for Leave in the Brexit referendum. Yet the area also includes some anti-Brexit cities such as Norwich and Cambridge. Last time UKIP won 35% of the vote and gained three MEPs (two of whom subsequently defected to other parties).
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union Symbols and Their Adoption by the European Parliament
    The European Union Symbols and their Adoption by the European Parliament Standard Note: SN/IA/4874 Last updated: 22 October 2008 Author: Vaughne Miller Section International Affairs and Defence Section This Note considers the symbols traditionally used by the European Union institutions and the recent formal adoption of them by the European Parliament. This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it. A suitably qualified professional should be consulted if specific advice or information is required. This information is provided subject to our general terms and conditions which are available online or may be provided on request in hard copy. Authors are available to discuss the content of this briefing with Members and their staff, but not with the general public. Contents 1 The Symbols of the EU 3 1.1 Flag 3 1.2 Anthem 4 1.3 Europe Day 4 1.4 Motto 5 1.5 Euro 5 2 Attempts to formalise the symbols through Treaty change 6 2.1 The Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe 6 2.2 The Treaty of Lisbon 6 3 European Parliament amendment to Rules of Procedure 7 3.1 Constitutional Affairs Committee report 7 3.2 The Plenary adopts the symbols 7 4 Implications and reaction 9 2 1 The Symbols of the EU The process for the adoption of the EU single currency in three stages was enshrined in the 1991 Treaty on European Union (Maastricht Treaty), although the aim of economic and monetary union (EMU) had been acknowledged at the 1969 European Council summit at The Hague.1 The EU flag, anthem and Europe Day were adopted by the European Council in Milan in 1985, while the “United in Diversity” motto was adopted in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • International Intervention and the Use of Force: Military and Police Roles
    004SSRpaperFRONT_16pt.ai4SSRpaperFRONT_16pt.ai 1 331.05.20121.05.2012 117:27:167:27:16 SSR PAPER 4 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K International Intervention and the Use of Force: Military and Police Roles Cornelius Friesendorf DCAF DCAF a centre for security, development and the rule of law SSR PAPER 4 International Intervention and the Use of Force Military and Police Roles Cornelius Friesendorf DCAF Published by Ubiquity Press Ltd. 6 Osborn Street, Unit 2N London E1 6TD www.ubiquitypress.com Text © Cornelius Friesendorf 2012 First published 2012 Transferred to Ubiquity Press 2018 Cover image © isafmedia Editors: Alan Bryden & Heiner Hänggi Production: Yury Korobovsky Copy editor: Cherry Ekins ISBN (PDF): 978-1-911529-31-6 ISSN (online): 2571-9297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bbo This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (unless stated otherwise within the content of the work). To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. This license allows for copying any part of the work for personal and commercial use, providing author attribution is clearly stated. This book was originally published by the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF), an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international community in pursuing good governance and reform of the security sector. The title transferred to Ubiquity Press when the series moved to an open access platform. The full text of this book was peer reviewed according to the original publisher’s policy at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 0 1 8 a N N U a L R E P O
    A N N U A L R E P O R T R E P O R T B Y 2 0 1 8 T H E A T L A N T I C T R E A T Y A S S O C I A T I O N A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A publication of Atlantic Treaty Association Club Prince Albert Rue des Petits Carmes, 20-24 B- 1000 Bruxelles Tel: +32 2 502 31 60 Email: [email protected] Web: www.atahq.org 1 CONTENTS MISSION & VISION FOREWORDS ATA President ATA Secretary General NATO PUBLICATION GENERAL ASSEMBLY BUCHAREST ATA MEMBERS Albania Italy Armenia Lithuania Austria Montenegro Azerbaijan Netherlands Bosnia & Herzegovina North Macedonia Bulgaria Norway Canada Portugal Croatia Romania Estonia Serbia Georgia Slovakia Germany Slovenia Greece Spain Hungary Ukraine Iceland United States (US) Israel 2 MISSION & VISION The Atlantic Treaty Association (ATA) is an organization of 37 national chapters that, since 1954, has been conducting research, analyses, training, education, and information activities on foreign policy, security and defense issues relevant to the Atlantic Alliance. Relying on its extended and highly qualified network, ATA produces top- notch knowledge on strategic themes and promotes a variety of programs and events. ATA initiatives draw together government and institutional authorities, political leaders, decision-makers, diplomats, civilian and military officers, academics, economic actors, media representatives, as well as young professionals and researchers, in an effort to further a cooperative approach to security and international relations. 3 ATA has established cooperation programs with likeminded organizations in countries of the NATO Partnership for Peace, Mediterranean Dialogue and Istanbul Cooperation Initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing and Tackling Violent Extremism – What Works Best?
    Preventing and tackling violent extremism – what works best? Wednesday, 31 May 2017 Science14 Atrium, Rue de la science 14b Brussels Conference Programme Morning session Time Topic Duration 08:30 Arrival and registration 30 min Welcome address 09:00 10 min - Hans Pung, RAND Europe Opening keynote speech 09:10 - Alexandra Antoniadis, Head of sector Prevention and radicalization, DG 20 min Home Panel 1 - EU and national responses to current security context, including terrorism and violent radicalization - Geoffrey Van Orden MEP 09:30 - Eva Joly MEP 75 min - Simon Smith, IMPACT Europe Advisory Board - Theo Muskee, Dutch National Police - Hans Pung, RAND Europe (Chair) 10:45 Coffee break 15 min Panel 2 - IMPACT Europe presentation - Joanna Hofman, RAND Europe 11:00 - Dianne van Hemert, TNO 60 min - Ron van Wonderen, Verwey-Jonker Instituut - Hans Pung, RAND Europe (Chair) 12:00 Buffet lunch 45 min This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no. 312235 Afternoon session Time Topic Duration Panel 3 - Ongoing measures to support countering violent extremism and their effectiveness and the contribution of IMPACT Europe - Merel Molenkamp, Radicalisation Awareness Network 12:45 - Ivan Calabuig-Williams, IMPACT Europe Advisory Board 90 min - Steffen Saigusa Nielsen, Aarhus Municipality - Ana Gomes MEP - Jean-Luc Marret, Fondation pour la recherche stratégique (Chair) Panel 4 - Emerging measures and approaches to preventing and countering violent extremism 14:15 - Rebecca Skellett, Strong Cities Network - Institute for Strategic Dialogue 70 min - Anissa Akhandaf, Antwerp Municipality - Prof. Hilary Pilkington, University of Manchester - Harald Weilnböck, Cultures Interactive (Chair) 15:25 Coffee break 20 min Panel 5 - Good practices and possible future initiatives for better understanding and tackling violent radicalization - Cristina Mattei, Hedayah 15:45 - Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2009 RESEARCH PAPER 09/53 17 June 2009
    European Parliament Elections 2009 RESEARCH PAPER 09/53 17 June 2009 Elections to the European Parliament were held across the 27 states of the European Union between 4 and 7 June 2009. The UK elections were held concurrently with the county council elections in England on 4 June. The UK now has 72 MEPs, down from 78 at the last election, distributed between 12 regions. The Conservatives won 25 seats, both UKIP and Labour 13 and the Liberal Democrats 11. The Green Party held their two seats, while the BNP won their first two seats in the European parliament. Labour lost five seats compared with the comparative pre-election position. The Conservatives won the popular vote overall, and every region in Great Britain except the North East, where Labour won, and Scotland, where the SNP won. UKIP won more votes than Labour. UK turnout was 34.5%. Across Europe, centre-right parties, whether in power or opposition, tended to perform better than those on the centre-left. The exact political balance of the new Parliament depends on the formation of Groups. The UK was not alone in seeing gains for far-right and nationalistic parties. Turnout across the EU was 43%. It was particularly low in some of the newer Member States. Part 1 of this paper presents the full results of the UK elections, including regional analysis and local-level data. Part 2 presents summary results of the results across the EU, together with country-level summaries based on data from official national sources. Adam Mellows-Facer Richard Cracknell Sean Lightbown Recent Research
    [Show full text]