University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting Template THE ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF ARMAMENT DEFENSE VARIATION IN AFRICAN ACACIAS By MEGAN CATHLEEN GITTINGER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2013 1 © 2013 Megan Cathleen Gittinger 2 To my mom, who always supports my endeavors with healthy skepticism 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank James Ekiru, James Olingnengero, John Lemboi, and Moso for research assistance in the field, without Ekiru I may have been trampled by elephants; Mike Littlewood for logistical support at Mpala Research Centre, cheery disposition and endless stories from the earlier days of Mpala and Kenya; Kathleen Rudolph for commiseration in the field research and for moral support along the way; Todd Palmer for feedback and support throughout my dissertation and for the Penicillins; Craig Osenberg for including me in lab meetings; the Research Reviews group for valuable feedback on experimental design; Dr. David Augustine for insightful feedback on herbivore foraging and for allowing me access to long-term exclosure plots at Mpala; Bernard Hauser for insights in plant development; Heather McAuslane for comments and discussions on inducible plant defense; Pamela Soltis for lab-support and guidance on molecular phylogenetics; Julian Resasco and Schuyler van Montfrans for being there from the beginning; Matthew Smith and Adrian Stier for adopting me as friend; Ashley Seifert for being my husband and for always finding what I have to say interesting; and my entire family for providing endless support and for being amazing role models for personal and professional life. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 8 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 9 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 12 Why Study Structural Defense Traits? .................................................................... 12 Why Study Acacia Spines? ..................................................................................... 12 General Overview ................................................................................................... 14 2 HERBIVORES AND PLANT SIZE AS DETERMINANTS OF SPINE DEFENSE MORPHOLOGY IN AN AFRICAN ACACIA ............................................................ 15 Background ............................................................................................................. 15 Methods .................................................................................................................. 17 Study Site ......................................................................................................... 17 Natural Variation in Spine Defenses ................................................................. 18 Herbivory and Spine Defenses ......................................................................... 18 Analysis ............................................................................................................ 19 Results .................................................................................................................... 19 Natural Variation in Spine Defenses ................................................................. 19 Herbivory and Spine Defenses ......................................................................... 20 Herbivory, Spine Defenses, and Plant Size ...................................................... 21 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 22 Relaxation of Spine Defenses following Herbivore Exclusion ........................... 22 Size-based Relationships in Spine Defenses ................................................... 23 3 SPINE VARIATION DETERMINES DEFENSIVE EFFICACY AGAINST BROWSERS OF DIFFERENT SIZES AND FEEDING STRATEGIES ................... 37 Background ............................................................................................................. 37 Methods .................................................................................................................. 40 Study Site and Feeding Trials .......................................................................... 40 Plant Selection and Branch Treatments ........................................................... 41 Biomass Estimates ........................................................................................... 41 Patterns of Biomass Removal .......................................................................... 43 Branch Type Characteristics ............................................................................ 44 Results .................................................................................................................... 44 5 Defense Efficacy of Spines Against Goats and Camels ................................... 44 Patterns of Biomass Removal .......................................................................... 45 Branch Type Characteristics ............................................................................ 46 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 48 Ecological Function and Consequences of Spine Form and Investment .......... 48 Mechanistic Links to Spine Variation ................................................................ 51 Evolutionary Significance of Armament Variation ............................................. 53 4 EVOLUTION OF SPINE FORM AND DOMATIA IN AFRICAN VACHELLIA .......... 59 Background ............................................................................................................. 59 Methods .................................................................................................................. 61 Species Sampling ............................................................................................. 61 DNA Extraction, Amplification and Sequencing ................................................ 62 Phylogenetic Estimation ................................................................................... 62 Trait Evolution .................................................................................................. 63 Results .................................................................................................................... 63 Phylogenetic Estimation ................................................................................... 63 Evolution of Spine Morphology ......................................................................... 64 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 65 Phylogenetic Relationships of African Vachellia ............................................... 65 Independent Origins of Spine Form and Domatia in Vachellia ......................... 66 Evolutionary Convergence of Structural Defense Traits ................................... 68 5 SPINES, PRICKLES AND THORNS, OH, MY! PHYSICAL ARMAMENTS AS STAND UP TRAITS FOR STUDYING PLANT DEFENSES ................................... 80 Background ............................................................................................................. 80 Armament Morphology and Development............................................................... 83 Prickles ............................................................................................................. 84 Spines .............................................................................................................. 85 Thorns .............................................................................................................. 86 Armament as an Effective Form of Resistance ....................................................... 88 Defensive Benefits of Armament ...................................................................... 88 Effects of Armament on Herbivore Feeding Behavior ...................................... 90 Costs of Defensive Armament ................................................................................ 94 Allocation Costs ................................................................................................ 94 Opportunity and Ecological Costs .................................................................... 97 Armament Plasticity ................................................................................................ 99 Responses as Induced Defenses ................................................................... 100 Ontogenetic Shifts in Armament ..................................................................... 102 Physiological Changes and Resource Allocation ........................................... 104 Future Directions .................................................................................................. 106 6 GENERAL CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................. 112 Determinants of Spine Defense
Recommended publications
  • Cheetah Conservation Fund Farmlands Wild and Native Species
    Cheetah Conservation Fund Farmlands Wild and Native Species List Woody Vegetation Silver terminalia Terminalia sericea Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 3: List of com- Blue green sour plum Ximenia Americana mon trees, scrub, and understory vegeta- Buffalo thorn Ziziphus mucronata tion found on CCF farms (2005). Warm-cure Pseudogaltonia clavata albizia Albizia anthelmintica Mundulea sericea Shepherds tree Boscia albitrunca Tumble weed Acrotome inflate Brandy bush Grevia flava Pig weed Amaranthus sp. Flame acacia Senegalia ataxacantha Wild asparagus Asparagus sp. Camel thorn Vachellia erioloba Tsama/ melon Citrullus lanatus Blue thorn Senegalia erubescens Wild cucumber Coccinea sessilifolia Blade thorn Senegalia fleckii Corchorus asplenifolius Candle pod acacia Vachellia hebeclada Flame lily Gloriosa superba Mountain thorn Senegalia hereroensis Tribulis terestris Baloon thron Vachellia luederitziae Solanum delagoense Black thorn Senegalia mellifera subsp. Detin- Gemsbok bean Tylosema esculentum ens Blepharis diversispina False umbrella thorn Vachellia reficience (Forb) Cyperus fulgens Umbrella thorn Vachellia tortilis Cyperus fulgens Aloe littoralis Ledebouria spp. Zebra aloe Aloe zebrine Wild sesame Sesamum triphyllum White bauhinia Bauhinia petersiana Elephant’s ear Abutilon angulatum Smelly shepherd’s tree Boscia foetida Trumpet thorn Catophractes alexandri Grasses Kudu bush Combretum apiculatum Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 4: List of com- Bushwillow Combretum collinum mon grass species found on CCF farms Lead wood Combretum imberbe (2005). Sand commiphora Commiphora angolensis Annual Three-awn Aristida adscensionis Brandy bush Grevia flava Blue Buffalo GrassCenchrus ciliaris Common commiphora Commiphora pyran- Bottle-brush Grass Perotis patens cathioides Broad-leaved Curly Leaf Eragrostis rigidior Lavender bush Croton gratissimus subsp. Broom Love Grass Eragrostis pallens Gratissimus Bur-bristle Grass Setaria verticillata Sickle bush Dichrostachys cinerea subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Prohibited from Sale in South Australia Plants Considered As Serious Weeds Are Banned from Being Sold in South Australia
    Plants prohibited from sale in South Australia Plants considered as serious weeds are banned from being sold in South Australia. Do not buy or sell any plant listed as prohibited from sale. Plants listed in this document are declared serious weeds and are prohibited from sale anywhere in South Australia pursuant to Section 188 of the Landscape South Australia Act 2019 (refer South Australian Government Gazette 60: 4024-4038, 23 July 2020). This includes the sale of nursery stock, seeds or other propagating material. However, it is not prohibited to sell or transport non-living products made from these plants, such as timber from Aleppo pine, or herbal medicines containing horehound. Such products are excluded from the definition of plant, under the Landscape South Australia (General) Regulations 2020. Section 3 of the Act defines sell as including: • barter, offer or attempt to sell • receive for sale • have in possession for sale • cause or permit to be sold or offered for sale • send, forward or deliver for sale • dispose of by any method for valuable consideration • dispose of to an agent for sale on consignment • sell for the purposes of resale How to use this list Plants are often known by many names. This list can help you to find the scientific name and other common names of a declared plant. This list is not intended to be a complete synonymy for each species, such as would be found in a taxonomic revision. The plants are listed alphabetically by the common name as used in the declaration. Each plant is listed in the following format: Common name alternative common name(s) Scientific name Author Synonym(s) Author What to do if you suspect a plant for sale is banned If you are unsure whether a plant offered for sale under a particular name is banned, please contact your regional landscape board or PIRSA Biosecurity SA.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Survey of Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve, Malawi
    YIKA-VWAZA TRUST RESEARCH STUDY REPORT N (2017/18) Vascular Plant Survey of Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve, Malawi By Sopani Sichinga ([email protected]) September , 2019 ABSTRACT In 2018 – 19, a survey on vascular plants was conducted in Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve. The reserve is located in the north-western Malawi, covering an area of about 986 km2. Based on this survey, a total of 461 species from 76 families were recorded (i.e. 454 Angiosperms and 7 Pteridophyta). Of the total species recorded, 19 are exotics (of which 4 are reported to be invasive) while 1 species is considered threatened. The most dominant families were Fabaceae (80 species representing 17. 4%), Poaceae (53 species representing 11.5%), Rubiaceae (27 species representing 5.9 %), and Euphorbiaceae (24 species representing 5.2%). The annotated checklist includes scientific names, habit, habitat types and IUCN Red List status and is presented in section 5. i ACKNOLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, let me thank the Nyika–Vwaza Trust (UK) for funding this work. Without their financial support, this work would have not been materialized. The Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW) Malawi through its Regional Office (N) is also thanked for the logistical support and accommodation throughout the entire study. Special thanks are due to my supervisor - Mr. George Zwide Nxumayo for his invaluable guidance. Mr. Thom McShane should also be thanked in a special way for sharing me some information, and sending me some documents about Vwaza which have contributed a lot to the success of this work. I extend my sincere thanks to the Vwaza Research Unit team for their assistance, especially during the field work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prosopis Juliflora - Prosopis Pallida Complex: a Monograph
    DFID DFID Natural Resources Systems Programme The Prosopis juliflora - Prosopis pallida Complex: A Monograph NM Pasiecznik With contributions from P Felker, PJC Harris, LN Harsh, G Cruz JC Tewari, K Cadoret and LJ Maldonado HDRA - the organic organisation The Prosopis juliflora - Prosopis pallida Complex: A Monograph NM Pasiecznik With contributions from P Felker, PJC Harris, LN Harsh, G Cruz JC Tewari, K Cadoret and LJ Maldonado HDRA Coventry UK 2001 organic organisation i The Prosopis juliflora - Prosopis pallida Complex: A Monograph Correct citation Pasiecznik, N.M., Felker, P., Harris, P.J.C., Harsh, L.N., Cruz, G., Tewari, J.C., Cadoret, K. and Maldonado, L.J. (2001) The Prosopis juliflora - Prosopis pallida Complex: A Monograph. HDRA, Coventry, UK. pp.172. ISBN: 0 905343 30 1 Associated publications Cadoret, K., Pasiecznik, N.M. and Harris, P.J.C. (2000) The Genus Prosopis: A Reference Database (Version 1.0): CD ROM. HDRA, Coventry, UK. ISBN 0 905343 28 X. Tewari, J.C., Harris, P.J.C, Harsh, L.N., Cadoret, K. and Pasiecznik, N.M. (2000) Managing Prosopis juliflora (Vilayati babul): A Technical Manual. CAZRI, Jodhpur, India and HDRA, Coventry, UK. 96p. ISBN 0 905343 27 1. This publication is an output from a research project funded by the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID. (R7295) Forestry Research Programme. Copies of this, and associated publications are available free to people and organisations in countries eligible for UK aid, and at cost price to others. Copyright restrictions exist on the reproduction of all or part of the monograph.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materialsupplementary Material
    10.1071/BT13149_AC © CSIRO 2013 Australian Journal of Botany 2013, 61(6), 436–445 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Comparative dating of Acacia: combining fossils and multiple phylogenies to infer ages of clades with poor fossil records Joseph T. MillerA,E, Daniel J. MurphyB, Simon Y. W. HoC, David J. CantrillB and David SeiglerD ACentre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600 Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BRoyal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Birdwood Avenue, South Yarra, Vic. 3141, Australia. CSchool of Biological Sciences, Edgeworth David Building, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. DDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. ECorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1 Materials used in the study Taxon Dataset Genbank Acacia abbreviata Maslin 2 3 JF420287 JF420065 JF420395 KC421289 KC796176 JF420499 Acacia adoxa Pedley 2 3 JF420044 AF523076 AF195716 AF195684; AF195703 Acacia ampliceps Maslin 1 KC421930 EU439994 EU811845 Acacia anceps DC. 2 3 JF420244 JF420350 JF419919 JF420130 JF420456 Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth 2 3 JF420259 JF420036 JF420366 JF419935 JF420146 KF048140 Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth. 1 2 3 JF420293 JF420402 KC421323 JQ248740 JF420505 Acacia baeuerlenii Maiden & R.T.Baker 2 3 JF420229 JQ248866 JF420336 JF419909 JF420115 JF420448 Acacia beckleri Tindale 2 3 JF420260 JF420037 JF420367 JF419936 JF420147 JF420473 Acacia cochlearis (Labill.) H.L.Wendl. 2 3 KC283897 KC200719 JQ943314 AF523156 KC284140 KC957934 Acacia cognata Domin 2 3 JF420246 JF420022 JF420352 JF419921 JF420132 JF420458 Acacia cultriformis A.Cunn. ex G.Don 2 3 JF420278 JF420056 JF420387 KC421263 KC796172 JF420494 Acacia cupularis Domin 2 3 JF420247 JF420023 JF420353 JF419922 JF420133 JF420459 Acacia dealbata Link 2 3 JF420269 JF420378 KC421251 KC955787 JF420485 Acacia dealbata Link 2 3 KC283375 KC200761 JQ942686 KC421315 KC284195 Acacia deanei (R.T.Baker) M.B.Welch, Coombs 2 3 JF420294 JF420403 KC421329 KC955795 & McGlynn JF420506 Acacia dempsteri F.Muell.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Germination and Early Seedling Survival of the Invasive Species Prosopis Juliflora (Fabaceae) Depend on Habitat and Seed Dispersal Mode in the Caatinga Dry Forest
    Seed germination and early seedling survival of the invasive species Prosopis juliflora (Fabaceae) depend on habitat and seed dispersal mode in the Caatinga dry forest Clóvis Eduardo de Souza Nascimento1,2, Carlos Alberto Domingues da Silva3,4, Inara Roberta Leal5, Wagner de Souza Tavares6, José Eduardo Serrão7, José Cola Zanuncio8 and Marcelo Tabarelli5 1 Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brasil 2 Departamento de Ciências Humanas, Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Juazeiro, Bahia, Brasil 3 Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Algodão, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brasil 4 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brasil 5 Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil 6 Asia Pacific Resources International Holdings Ltd. (APRIL), PT. Riau Andalan Pulp and Paper (RAPP), Pangkalan Kerinci, Riau, Indonesia 7 Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil 8 Departamento de Entomologia/BIOAGRO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil ABSTRACT Background: Biological invasion is one of the main threats to tropical biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Prosopis juliflora (Sw) DC. (Fabales: Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae) was introduced in the Caatinga dry forest of Northeast Brazil at early 1940s and successfully spread across the region. As other invasive species, it may benefit from the soils and seed dispersal by livestock. Here we examine how seed Submitted 22 November 2018 Accepted 5 July 2020 dispersal ecology and soil conditions collectively affect seed germination, early Published 3 September 2020 seedling performance and consequently the P.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Tree in the Mediterranean Basin Hotspot? a Critical Analysis
    Médail et al. Forest Ecosystems (2019) 6:17 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0170-6 RESEARCH Open Access What is a tree in the Mediterranean Basin hotspot? A critical analysis Frédéric Médail1* , Anne-Christine Monnet1, Daniel Pavon1, Toni Nikolic2, Panayotis Dimopoulos3, Gianluigi Bacchetta4, Juan Arroyo5, Zoltán Barina6, Marwan Cheikh Albassatneh7, Gianniantonio Domina8, Bruno Fady9, Vlado Matevski10, Stephen Mifsud11 and Agathe Leriche1 Abstract Background: Tree species represent 20% of the vascular plant species worldwide and they play a crucial role in the global functioning of the biosphere. The Mediterranean Basin is one of the 36 world biodiversity hotspots, and it is estimated that forests covered 82% of the landscape before the first human impacts, thousands of years ago. However, the spatial distribution of the Mediterranean biodiversity is still imperfectly known, and a focus on tree species constitutes a key issue for understanding forest functioning and develop conservation strategies. Methods: We provide the first comprehensive checklist of all native tree taxa (species and subspecies) present in the Mediterranean-European region (from Portugal to Cyprus). We identified some cases of woody species difficult to categorize as trees that we further called “cryptic trees”. We collected the occurrences of tree taxa by “administrative regions”, i.e. country or large island, and by biogeographical provinces. We studied the species-area relationship, and evaluated the conservation issues for threatened taxa following IUCN criteria. Results: We identified 245 tree taxa that included 210 species and 35 subspecies, belonging to 33 families and 64 genera. It included 46 endemic tree taxa (30 species and 16 subspecies), mainly distributed within a single biogeographical unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/4864/4475
    Teketay et al. Ecological Processes (2018) 7:5 DOI 10.1186/s13717-018-0116-x RESEARCH Open Access Enhancement of diversity, stand structure and regeneration of woody species through area exclosure: the case of a mopane woodland in northern Botswana Demel Teketay1*, Keotshephile Kashe2, Joseph Madome2, Monica Kabelo2, John Neelo2, Mmusi Mmusi2 and Wellington Masamba2 Abstract Introduction: An area exclosure is the practice of land management that involves the exclusion of livestock and humans from openly accessing an area that is characterized by severe degradation. Area exclosures have been employed as cheap and convenient means of rehabilitating degraded forests/woodlands. A study was carried out to (i) assess the species richness, diversity and evenness; (ii) determine the densities, frequencies, dominance and importance value index; and (iii) assess the population structure and regeneration status of woody species inside and outside the fence (area exclosure) of Okavango Research Institute (ORI) located in Maun, northern Botswana. Results: Thirty-five woody species were recorded inside (32 spp.) and outside (24 spp.) the ORI compound, and the population structure and regeneration status of the woody species were better inside than outside the ORI compound. The exclosure had seven times higher mean density of woody species than outside ORI, and an exceptional regeneration of seedlings was observed inside than outside the ORI compound, suggesting the process of recovery of the degraded woodland. The frequencies of more than half of the woody species also showed increment inside than outside the exclosure. The results suggest that the exclosed area is still in an initial recovery stage since it had been an open grazing area prior to the establishment of the exclosure.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Botswana Journal of Agriculture and Applied Sciences, Volume 14, Issue 1 (2020) 7–16 BOJAAS Research Article Comparative nutritive value of an invasive exotic plant species, Prosopis glandulosa Torr. var. glandulosa, and five indigenous plant species commonly browsed by small stock in the BORAVAST area, south-western Botswana M. K. Ditlhogo1, M. P Setshogo1,* and G. Mosweunyane2 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Botswana, Private Bag UB00704, Gaborone, Botswana. 2Geoflux Consulting Company, P.O. Box 2403, Gaborone, Botswana. ARTICLE INFORMATION ________________________ Keywords Abstract: Nutritive value of an invasive exotic plant species, Prosopis glandulosa Torr. var. glandulosa, and five indigenous plant species Nutritive value commonly browsed by livestock in Bokspits, Rapplespan, Vaalhoek and Prosopis glandulosa Struizendam (BORAVAST), southwest Botswana, was determined and BORAVAST compared. These five indigenous plant species were Vachellia Indigenous plant species hebeclada (DC.) Kyal. & Boatwr. subsp. hebeclada, Vachellia erioloba (E. Mey.) P.J.H. Hurter, Senegalia mellifera (Vahl) Seigler & Ebinger Article History: subsp. detinens (Burch.) Kyal. & Boatwr., Boscia albitrunca (Burch.) Submission date: 25 Jun. 2019 Gilg & Gilg-Ben. var. albitrunca and Rhigozum trichotomum Burch. Revised: 14 Jan. 2020 The levels of Crude Protein (CP), Phosphorus (P), Calcium (C), Accepted: 16 Jan. 2020 Magnesium (Mg), Sodium (Na) and Potassium (K) were determined for Available online: 04 Apr. 2020 the plant’s foliage and pods (where available). All plant species had a https://bojaas.buan.ac.bw CP value higher than the recommended daily intake. There are however multiple mineral deficiencies in the plant species analysed. Nutritive Corresponding Author: value of Prosopis glandulosa is comparable to those other species despite the perception that livestock that browse on it are more Moffat P.
    [Show full text]
  • Trees and Plants for Bees and Beekeepers in the Upper Mara Basin
    Trees and plants for bees and beekeepers in the Upper Mara Basin Guide to useful melliferous trees and crops for beekeepers December 2017 Contents Who is this guide for? .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction to the MaMaSe Project .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Market driven forest conservation initiatives in the Upper Mara basin ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Water, apiculture, forests, trees and livelihoods ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Types of bees ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 How this
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Patterns of Variation Within the Central-European Tephroseris Longifolia Agg.: Karyological and Morphological Study
    Preslia 87: 163–194, 2015 163 Exploring patterns of variation within the central-European Tephroseris longifolia agg.: karyological and morphological study Karyologická a morfologická variabilita v rámci Tephroseris longifolia agg. Katarína O l š a v s k á1, Barbora Šingliarová1, Judita K o c h j a r o v á1,3, Zuzana Labdíková2,IvetaŠkodová1, Katarína H e g e d ü š o v á1 &MonikaJanišová1 1Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-84523 Bratislava, Slovakia, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Matej Bel, Tajovského 40, SK-97401 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia; 3Comenius University, Bratislava, Botanical Garden – detached unit, SK-03815 Blatnica, Slovakia Olšavská K., Šingliarová B., Kochjarová J., LabdíkováZ.,ŠkodováI.,HegedüšováK.&JanišováM. (2015): Exploring patterns of variation within the central-European Tephroseris longifolia agg.: karyological and morphological study. – Preslia 87: 163–194. Tephroseris longifolia agg. is an intricate complex of perennial outcrossing herbaceous plants. Recently, five subspecies with rather separate distributions and different geographic patterns were assigned to the aggregate: T. longifolia subsp. longifolia, subsp. pseudocrispa and subsp. gaudinii predominate in the Eastern Alps; the distribution of subsp. brachychaeta is confined to the northern and central Apennines and subsp. moravica is endemic in the Western Carpathians. Carpathian taxon T. l. subsp. moravica is known only from nine localities in Slovakia and the Czech Republic and is treated as an endangered taxon of European importance (according to Natura 2000 network). As the taxonomy of this aggregate is not comprehensively elaborated the aim of this study was to detect variability within the Tephroseris longifolia agg.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Genbank (Refer to Table
    COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujdigispace.uj.ac.za (Accessed: Date). ` The assessment of DNA barcoding as an identification tool for traded and protected trees in southern Africa: Mozambican commercial timber species as a case study By Ronny Mukala Kabongo Dissertation presented in the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTIAE in BOTANY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY AND PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR: PROF MICHELLE VAN DER BANK CO-SUPERVISOR: DR. OLIVIER MAURIN January 2014 I hereby declare that this dissertation has been composed by me and work contained within unless stated otherwise, is my own. Signed: Ronny Mukala Kabongo Date: 30 January 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]