DOCSLIB.ORG

A Checklist of Surrey Coleoptera

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Checklist of Surrey Coleoptera A PROVISIONAL CHECKLIST OF THE COLEOPTERA OF HAMPSHIRE AND THE ISLE OF WIGHT Dr.Jonty Denton 2013 1 ALBION ECOLOGY Symbols + = present in Vice-county * pre 1980 record only Sf= sub-fossil R= Roman 2 Gyrinidae (Whirlygigs) Vc10 Vc11 Vc12 Notes Gyrinus aeratus Stephens, 1832 + (Nb) Gyrinus caspius Menetries, 1832 + Round Hill 2003 (JSD) Lymington Titchfield Haven (JSD) Gyrinus marinus Gyllenhal, 1808 + + Local, on open water esp. on large water bodies such as lakes and canal margins. Gyrinus paykulli Ochs, 1927 * * Alverstoke and Portsea Gyrinus substriatus Stephens, 1828 + + Widespread and often abundant on ponds,canals, ditches and lakes. Gyrinus urinator Illiger, 1807 The Artist * + + (Nb) Local, frequent in River Wey Wrecclesham Orectochilus villosus (Mueller, 1776) * + + Local, on streams often in deep shade. Largely nocturnal and easily overlooked. Hairy whirlygig. Haliplidae (Crawling water beetles) Vc10 Vc11 Vc12 Notes Brychius elevatus (Panzer, 1793) + + V.Local in flowing water esp. in submerged gravel and near weirs. Peltodytes caesus (Duftschmid, 1805) + + + (Nb) Rare but increasing? Weedy ponds, Haliplus apicalis Thomson, 1868 * Portsea (Moncreaff) Haliplus confinis Stephens, 1828 + + + Local in ponds, lakes and canals with Charophytes Haliplus flavicollis Sturm, 1834 + + V.local in large ponds, canals. Haliplus fluviatilis Aube, 1836 + + Widespread in ponds, lakes, canals etc. Haliplus fulvus (F., 1801) + + V.local in large ponds, Woolmer. (JSD) Haliplus heydeni Wehncke, 1875 + + + (Nb) V.local in small detritus ponds. Haliplus immaculatus Gerhardt, 1877 + + + Widespread in weedy ponds Haliplus laminatus (Schaller, 1783) + + + (Nb) Weedy streams and ponds. Haliplus lineatocollis (Marsham, 1802) + + + Widespread in streams, ditches and weedy ponds. Haliplus lineolatus Mannerheim, 1844 + Rare? [canals, ponds, flooded gravel pits] Haliplus mucronatus Stephens, 1828 * Alverstoke see Balfour-Browne 1952 Haliplus obliquus (F., 1787) + + + Local, but can be a rapid coloniser of new ponds with Chara Haliplus ruficollis (Degeer, 1774) + + + Widpespread in detritus ponds. Haliplus sibiricus Motsch.,1860 + + Local in standing water Haliplus variegatus Sturm, 1834 + RDB 3 Noteridae Noterus clavicornis (Degeer, 1774) + + Widespread and common in ponds, canals, and lakes +30 post 1980 records Noterus crassicornis (Muller, 1776) * Hygrobiidae Hygrobia hermanni (F., 1775) Screech Beetle + + + Widespread but local in ponds esp. with silty substrates +20 post 1980 records 4 Dytiscidae (Diving Beetles) Vc10 Vc11 Vc12 Notes Laccophilus hyalinus (Degeer, 1774) + + + Local, in slow flowing water, frequent in Basingstoke Canal, occasionally in ponds Laccophilus minutus (L., 1758) + + + Widespread and common in ponds, canals, and lakes Laccophilus poecilus * Portsea (Moncreaff) Hyphydrus ovatus (L., 1761) + + + Widespread and common in ponds, canals, and lakes Hydrovatus clypealis Sharp, 1876 * + (Nb) Lake Common IoW 1926 (JLH) Bidessus unistriatus (Schrank, 1781) + Hydroglyphus pusillus (F., 1781) + + + (Nb) Widespread, a rapid coloniser of new ponds with silty substrates. Hygrotus confluens (F., 1787) + + + Widespread a rapid coloniser of new ponds with silty substrates. Hygrotus decoratus (Gyllenhal, 1810) * + (Nb) Rare in well vegetated marshy wetland and pond margins. Woolmer Pond (JSD) Portsea (Moncreaff) Hygrotus inaequalis (F., 1777) + + + Widespread and common in ponds, canals, and lakes Hygrotus impressopunctatus (Schaller,1783) + + + Widespread in ponds, esp. on heathland. Hygrotus nigrolineatus (von Steven, 1808) + (Na) Recent immigrant increasing in new ponds. Castle Bottom (JSD) Hygrotus novemlineatus (Stephens, 1829) * Woolmer P Hygrotus parellelogrammus (Ahrens, 1812) + + Hygrotus quinquelineatus (Zetterstedt, 1828) * New Forest A.Thornley det FBB Hygrotus versicolor (Schaller, 1783) + + + (Nb) Rare formerly in Basingstoke canal, no post 1980 records. Hydroporus angustatus Sturm, 1835 + + + Widespread and common in ponds, canals, and lakes, avoiding acidic heath ponds. Hydroporus discretus Fairmaire, 1859 + + + V.local in spring fed puddles and pools Hydroporus erythrocephalus (L., 1758) + + + Widespread and common in ponds and lakes, esp. in acidic heath ponds. Hydroporus ferrugineus Stephens, 1829 ? + (Nb) Rare. Confined to small springhead areas on the Gault? slopes of Hydroporus gyllenhali Schioedte, 1841 + + + Widespread and common in ponds and lakes, esp. in acidic heath ponds. Hydroporus incognitus Sharp, 1869 + + + Local in shaded pools and marshy pools beside streams. Hydroporus longicornis Sharp, 1871 + (Nb) Hydroporus longulus Mulsant, 1860 + (Nb) Rare in spring fed streams. Liss Forest (JSD) Hydroporus marginatus (Duftschmid, 1805) + + Hydroporus melanarius Sturm, 1835 + + Local in small pools on heathland Hydroporus memnonius Nicolai, 1822 + + Widespread in woodland pools in flooded leaf litter Hydroporus neglectus Schaum, 1845 + (Nb) V.Local in shaded acid pools. 6 post 1980 records Hydroporus nigrita (F., 1792) + + + Local in a variety of small water bodies including small seasonal pools. Hydroporus obscurus Sturm, 1835 * + + Local in flooded Sphagnum on heaths and in bogs. Hydroporus palustris (L., 1761) + + + Widespread in detritus ponds and marshy areas by lakes and flowing water Hydroporus planus (F., 1781) + + + Widespread rapid coloniser of new and recently cleared ponds also in water troughs Hydroporus pubescens (Gyllenhal, 1808) + + + Widespread in acid standing water Hydroporus scalesianus Stephens, 1828 * Portsea <1880 (Moncreaff) Hydroporus striola (Gyllenhal, 1827) + + Local in standing water Hydroporus tessellatus Drapiez, 1819 + + + Widespread rapid coloniser of new and recently cleared ponds also in water troughs, isolated puddles Hydroporus tristis (Paykull, 1798) + + Local in small pools esp. Sphagnum pools on heathland Hydroporus umbrosus (Gyllenhal, 1808) + + Local in small pools esp. Sphagnum pools on heathland Stictonectes lepidus (Olivier, 1795) + * Suphrodytes dorsalis (F., 1784) + + Local in shaded detritus ponds. Deronectes latus (Stephens, 1829) + + + Rare River Rother, Liss 1994 (JSD) 5 Porhydrus lineatus (F., 1775) + + Graptodytes flavipes (Olivier, 1795) * + (RDB2) Extinct? Graptodytes granularis (L., 1767) + (Nb) Extinct?? No modern records, ought to still occur some where! Graptodytes pictus (F., 1787) + + Nebrioporus depressus (F.) ssp. elegans + + + Local in rivers and permanent streams occasionally in deep ponds in pits etc. (Panzer) Stictotarsus duodecimpustulatus (F., 1792) + + Local Oreodytes sanmarki (Sahlberg, 1826) + + + Local in streams esp. in root tangles, shade tolerant. Copelatus haemorrhoidalis (F., 1787) + + + Local. In weedy detritus ponds and bog pools. Platambus maculatus (L., 1758) + + Local in flowing water, streams, and rivers. Tolerant of shade. Agabus affinis (Paykull, 1798) + + V.local in acid ponds typically in flooded Sphagnum. Agabus biguttatus (Olivier, 1795) + Nb Rare [calcareous ground fed waters, spring heads] Rudd Kimpton Agabus bipustulatus (L., 1767) + + R+ Ubiquitous in stagnant water including horse troughs etc. a strong flyer. Agabus brunneus (F., 1798) + Agabus congener (Thunberg, 1794) + Emer Bog 2002 (JSD) Agabus conspersus (Marsham, 1802) * + (Nb) Freshwater 1922 (JLH) Titchfield haven 1996 (JSD) Agabus didymus (Olivier, 1795) + + + Local in flowing water amongst marginal vegetation. Agabus guttatus (Paykull, 1798) + + + Local in spring fed streams and well heads also outfalls of man made drains Agabus labiatus (Brahm, 1790) + + (Nb) Rare. In shallow heath pools. Agabus melanarius Aube, 1837 + (Nb) Rare. Seepages in woodlands, amongst flooded Sphagnum and leaf litter Agabus nebulosus (Forster, 1771) + + + Widespread. In silt ponds esp. new or recently cleared sites , a strong flier also frequent in troughs etc. Agabus paludosus (F., 1801) * + + Local, in weedy margins of flowing water, also around small seepages and springheads in flooded litter and moss. Agabus sturmii (Gyllenhal, 1808) + + + Widespread in detritus ponds. Agabus uliginosus (L., 1761) * Alverstoke (Adams) Agabus unguicularis (Thomson, 1867) + Agabus undulatus (Schrank, 1776) * * Portsea (Moncreaff) Ilybius aenescens Thomson, 1870 + + (Nb) Rare. In acid ponds typically in flooded Sphagnum Ilybius ater (Degeer, 1774) + + Widespread in all kinds of standing waters. Also comes to light Ilybius chalconatus (Panzer, 1796) + + Local. In ponds and rut pools in wooded areas, in VC17 commoner than I.montanus. Ilybius fenestratus (F., 1781) * + (Nb) V.local. In large ponds, lakes esp. in heathland areas. Frequent along Basingstoke canal. Tolerant of heavy fish stocking Ilybius fuliginosus (F., 1792) + + + Widespread in ponds and weedy margins of flowing water. Also comes to light. Ilybius guttiger (Gyllenhal, 1808) + + (Nb) V.local. In pools on heathland Ilybius montanus Zimmermann, 1915 + + Local in acid ponds esp. on heathland Ilybius quadriguttatus (Lacordaire, 1835) * + + Local in detritus ponds Ilybius subaeneus Erichson, 1837 ? (Nb) Extinct Woolmer Pond Rhantus exsoletus (Forster, 1771) ? + Local in detritus ponds and marshy areas Rhantus frontalis (Marsham, 1802) * * Portsea (Moncreaff) Rhantus grapii (Gyllenhal, 1808) + + (Nb) Local in richly vegetated (usually old) ponds and in Sphagnum in richer bog pools Rhantus suturalis (MacLeay, 1825) + + + (Nb) Widespread good coloniser of new and recently cleared silt pools. Freshwater 1989 (S.K-J) Rhantus suturellus (Harris, 1828) + + Local. In peat pools on heathland. Colymbetes fuscus (L., 1758) + + Frequent species of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/32097 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2019-01-28 and may be subject to change. Matching species to a changing landscape -Aquatic macroinvertebrates in a heterogeneous landscape- ISBN: 978-90-9022753-5 Layout: A.M. Antheunisse Printed by: Gildeprint Drukkerijen B.V. © 2008 W.C.E.P. Verberk; all rights reserved. Verberk W.C.E.P. (2008) Matching species to a changing landscape - Aquatic macroinvertebrates in a heterogeneous landscape. PhD thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen. This research project was financed by the program Development and Management of Nature Quality (O+BN) of the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (project number 3911773). Matching species to a changing landscape -Aquatic macroinvertebrates in a heterogeneous landscape- Een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van de Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde en Informatica PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann, volgens besluit van het College van Decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 7 maart 2008 om 10:30 uur precies door Wilhelmus Cornelis Egbertus Petrus Verberk geboren op 30 juni 1976 te Oploo, Nederland Promotores: Prof. dr. H. Siepel Prof. dr. G. van der Velde (Vrije Universiteit, Brussel) Copromotores: Dr. R.S.E.W. Leuven Dr. P.F.M. Verdonschot (Alterra, Wageningen UR) Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007)
    UK Biodiversity Action Plan List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) For more information about the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) visit https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/uk-bap/ List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) A list of the UK BAP priority terrestrial invertebrate species, divided by taxonomic group into: Insects, Arachnids, Molluscs and Other invertebrates (Crustaceans, Worms, Cnidaria, Bryozoans, Millipedes, Centipedes), is provided in the tables below. The list was created between 1995 and 1999, and subsequently updated in response to the Species and Habitats Review Report published in 2007. The table also provides details of the species' occurrences in the four UK countries, and describes whether the species was an 'original' species (on the original list created between 1995 and 1999), or was added following the 2007 review. All original species were provided with Species Action Plans (SAPs), species statements, or are included within grouped plans or statements, whereas there are no published plans for the species added in 2007. Scientific names and commonly used synonyms derive from the Nameserver facility of the UK Species Dictionary, which is managed by the Natural History Museum. Insects Scientific name Common Taxon England Scotland Wales Northern Original UK name Ireland BAP species? Acosmetia caliginosa Reddish Buff moth Y N Yes – SAP Acronicta psi Grey Dagger moth Y Y Y Y Acronicta rumicis Knot Grass moth Y Y N Y Adscita statices The Forester moth Y Y Y Y Aeshna isosceles
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Coleoptera, Attelabidae, Apoderinae, Hoplapoderini
    Zootaxa 1089: 37–47 (2005) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1089 Copyright © 2005 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new genus and species of Hoplapoderini from Madagascar (Coleoptera: Attelabidae: Apoderinae) SILVANO BIONDI Via E. di Velo 137, I-36100 Vicenza - Italy. email: [email protected] Abstract Madapoderus pacificus, a new genus and species of hoplapoderine attelabid beetles, is described from Madagascar. A key to the genera of Hoplapoderini and field observations on the host plant and reproductive behaviour of the new species are provided. Key words: Attelabidae, Apoderinae, Hoplapoderini, Madagascar, new genus, new species, Grewia Introduction In May 2002, among specimens of Attelabidae collected in Madagascar by David Hauck some months earlier, I received two males belonging to the apoderine tribe Hoplapoderini that could not be assigned to any known genus. A study of the rich collection of Madagascan attelabids at the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, a few months later confirmed this diagnosis. During a month-long collecting expedition in Madagascar in December 2003 and January 2004, I collected the new taxon again, at a different locality, and could carry out some observations on its behaviour. Systematics Tribe Hoplapoderini Voss, 1926 Voss (1926) defined his tribe Hoplapoderini largely on the basis of features of the head and elytra. The new Madagascan genus fits into this tribe due to its tapered head, with maximum width near the basis, and its tuberculate elytra. Voss also provided a key to the Accepted by Q. Wang: 7 Oct. 2005; published: 2 Dec. 2005 37 ZOOTAXA genera of the tribe, but this is largely inadequate because of its heavy reliance on the 1089 presence and shape of what he called “abdominal lobes” (“Abdominallappen”).
    [Show full text]
  • Beetles from Sălaj County, Romania (Coleoptera, Excluding Carabidae)
    Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldiş”, Seria Ştiinţele Vieţii Vol. 26 supplement 1, 2016, pp.5- 58 © 2016 Vasile Goldis University Press (www.studiauniversitatis.ro) BEETLES FROM SĂLAJ COUNTY, ROMANIA (COLEOPTERA, EXCLUDING CARABIDAE) Ottó Merkl, Tamás Németh, Attila Podlussány Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum ABSTRACT: During a faunistical exploration of Sǎlaj county carried out in 2014 and 2015, 840 beetle species were recorded, including two species of Community interest (Natura 2000 species): Cucujus cinnaberinus (Scopoli, 1763) and Lucanus cervus Linnaeus, 1758. Notes on the distribution of Augyles marmota (Kiesenwetter, 1850) (Heteroceridae), Trichodes punctatus Fischer von Waldheim, 1829 (Cleridae), Laena reitteri Weise, 1877 (Tenebrionidae), Brachysomus ornatus Stierlin, 1892, Lixus cylindrus (Fabricius, 1781) (Curculionidae), Mylacomorphus globus (Seidlitz, 1868) (Curculionidae) are given. Key words: Coleoptera, beetles, Sǎlaj, Romania, Transsylvania, faunistics INTRODUCTION: László Dányi, LF = László Forró, LR = László The beetle fauna of Sǎlaj county is relatively little Ronkay, MT = Mária Tóth, OM = Ottó Merkl, PS = known compared to that of Romania, and even to other Péter Sulyán, VS = Viktória Szőke, ZB = Zsolt Bálint, parts of Transsylvania. Zilahi Kiss (1905) listed ZE = Zoltán Erőss, ZS = Zoltán Soltész, ZV = Zoltán altogether 2,214 data of 1,373 species of 537 genera Vas). The serial numbers in parentheses refer to the list from Sǎlaj county mainly based on his own collections of collecting sites published in this volume by A. and partially on those of Kuthy (1897). Some of his Gubányi. collection sites (e.g. Tasnád or Hadad) no longer The collected specimens were identified by belong to Sǎlaj county. numerous coleopterists. Their names are given under Vasile Goldiş Western University (Arad) and the the names of beetle families.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invertebrate Fauna of Dune and Machair Sites In
    INSTITUTE OF TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY (NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL) REPORT TO THE NATURE CONSERVANCY COUNCIL ON THE INVERTEBRATE FAUNA OF DUNE AND MACHAIR SITES IN SCOTLAND Vol I Introduction, Methods and Analysis of Data (63 maps, 21 figures, 15 tables, 10 appendices) NCC/NE RC Contract No. F3/03/62 ITE Project No. 469 Monks Wood Experimental Station Abbots Ripton Huntingdon Cambs September 1979 This report is an official document prepared under contract between the Nature Conservancy Council and the Natural Environment Research Council. It should not be quoted without permission from both the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology and the Nature Conservancy Council. (i) Contents CAPTIONS FOR MAPS, TABLES, FIGURES AND ArPENDICES 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 OBJECTIVES 2 3 METHODOLOGY 2 3.1 Invertebrate groups studied 3 3.2 Description of traps, siting and operating efficiency 4 3.3 Trapping period and number of collections 6 4 THE STATE OF KNOWL:DGE OF THE SCOTTISH SAND DUNE FAUNA AT THE BEGINNING OF THE SURVEY 7 5 SYNOPSIS OF WEATHER CONDITIONS DURING THE SAMPLING PERIODS 9 5.1 Outer Hebrides (1976) 9 5.2 North Coast (1976) 9 5.3 Moray Firth (1977) 10 5.4 East Coast (1976) 10 6. THE FAUNA AND ITS RANGE OF VARIATION 11 6.1 Introduction and methods of analysis 11 6.2 Ordinations of species/abundance data 11 G. Lepidoptera 12 6.4 Coleoptera:Carabidae 13 6.5 Coleoptera:Hydrophilidae to Scolytidae 14 6.6 Araneae 15 7 THE INDICATOR SPECIES ANALYSIS 17 7.1 Introduction 17 7.2 Lepidoptera 18 7.3 Coleoptera:Carabidae 19 7.4 Coleoptera:Hydrophilidae to Scolytidae
    [Show full text]
  • Flea Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Associated with Purple Loosestrife, Lythrum Salicaria, in Russia
    Flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) associated with purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria, in Russia Margarita Yu. Dolgovskaya,1 Alexander S. Konstantinov,2 Sergey Ya. Reznik,1 Neal R. Spencer3 and Mark G. Volkovitsh1 Summary Purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria L., has become one of the more troublesome wetland exotic inva- sive weeds in Canada and the United States from initial introductions some 200 years ago. In the US, purple loosestrife has spread to most of the contiguous 48 states (no records from Florida) with the highest density in the north-east. L. salicaria is now recorded in all Canadian provinces with the excep- tion of Yukon and the North-West Territories. A biological control effort begun in the 1970s resulted in the introduction in the 1990s of four insect species: a root-boring and a flower-feeding weevil, and two leaf beetle species (both adults and larvae are leaf feeders). As long-term impact assessments of these introductions are conducted, additional research is looking at other potential biological control agents, particularly insect species attacking both leaves and roots of the target plant. Thus, flea beetles with root-feeding larvae and leaf-feeding adults may be of value. Purple loosestrife is widespread in Russia in wet meadows, riverbanks and other moist habitats from the Baltic region to eastern Russia. Literature searches, studies of museum collections and ecological observations in the field and the laboratory suggest that a number of flea beetle species feed on L. salicaria, of which the oligophagous Aphthona lutescens with a flexible life cycle and two-fold impact on the host (larvae are root-borers and adults are leaf feeders) appears to be a particularly promising biocontrol agent.
    [Show full text]
  • SPIXIANA ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München;Download
    ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München;download: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.biologiezentrum.at SPIXIANA ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München;download: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.biologiezentrum.at at leaping (haitikos in Greek) for locomotion and escape; thus, the original valid name of the type genus Altica Müller, 1764 (see Fürth, 1981). Many Flea Beetles are among the most affective jumpers in the animal kingdom, sometimes better than their namesakes the true Fleas (Siphonaptera). However, despite some intensive study of the anatomy and function of the metafemoral spring (Barth, 1954; Ker, 1977) the true function of this jumping mechanism remains a mystery. It probably is some sort of voluntary Catch, in- volving build-up of tension from the large muscles that insert on the metafemoral spring (Fig. 1), and theo a quick release of this energy. Ofcourse some Flea Beetles jump better than others, but basically all have this internal metafemoral spring floating by attachment from large muscles in the relatively enlarged bind femoral capsule (see Fig. 1 ). In fact Flea Beetles can usually be easily separated from other beetles, including chrysomelid subfa- milies, by their greatly swollen bind femora. There are a few genera of Alticinae that have a metafemoral spring and yet do not jump. Actually there are a few genera that are considered to be Alticinae that lack the metafemo- ral spring, e. g. Orthaltica (Scherer, 1974, 1981b - as discussed in this Symposium). Also the tribe Decarthrocerini contains three genera from Africa that Wilcox (1965) con- sidered as Galerucinae, but now thinks to be intermediate between Galerucinae and Alti- cinae; at least one of these genera does have a metafemoral spring (Wilcox, personal communication, and Fürth, unpublished data).
    [Show full text]
  • Für Naturschutz Und Landschaftspflege Schleswig-Holstein, Heft 5 LOHSE, G
    Landesamtfür Naturschutz und 24145 Kiel Verfasser: Wolfgang Ziegler Roland Suikat unter Mitarbeit von Stephan Gürlich Titelfoto: Eubrychius velutus (2,8 mm), ein untergetaucht lebender Russelkafer. Die dichte Beschuppung er- mdglicht es dein Käfer, einer Sauerstoff mantel mit sich zu fuhren, so daß das Auftauchen unterbleiben Fotos: Roland Suikat Herstellung dfni Druckerei Fotosatz Nord Wittland 8a 24109 Kiel Juli 1994 ISBN 3-923339-44-5 q o Der §!mschlag dieser Broschüre wurde auf Innenteil auf Recycling gedruckt. -papier Diese Druckschrift wird im Rahmen der Öffent- lichkeitsarbeit der schleswig-holsteinischen Landesregierung heraus- gegeben. Sie darf weder von Parteien noch von Personen, die Wahlwer- bung oder Wahlhilfe betreiben, im Wahlkampf zum Zwecke der Wahl- werbunguerwendet Auch ohne zeitlichen Bezug zu einer bevorste- henden Wahl darf die Druckschrift nicht in einer Weise verwendet werden, die als Parteinahme der Landesregierung zugun- sten einzelner Gruppen verstanden werden konnte. Den Parteien ist es gestattet, die Druckschrift zur Unterrichtung ihrer eigenen Mitglieder zu ocr- Inhalt 5 Einleitung 7 Erfassungsgrundlagen 8 Gefährdungskategorien 12 Nomenklatur 13 Familienregister 16 Rote Liste der Käfer Schlewig-Holsteins 80 Ubersicht zur Namensänderungen und systematischen Umstellungen in zoologisch-systematischer Sortierung 86 Bilanzierung und Gefährdungsursachen 93 Literatur Einleitung Die Käfer stellen weltweit eine der artenreichsten Ordnun- gen innerhalb des Tierreichs dar. In Schleswig-Holstein besiedeln sie mit Ausnahme des offenen Meeres sämtliche Lebensraumtypen. Aufgrund ihrer oftmals erstaunlichen Biotop- und Habitatbindungen sind die Käfer für die Bio- indikation, d. h. für die Bewertung von Lebensräumen und deren Einzelstrukturen, besonders geeignet. Vielfach aber sind die Lebensraumansprüche im einzelnen noch uner- forscht. Daraus erwächst umso stärker die Verpflichtung, die landschaftliche Strukturvielfalt zu erkennen, zu bewah- ren und wiederherzustellen.
    [Show full text]
  • Elvetham Heath Management Plan
    ELVETHAM HEATH LOCAL NATURE RESERVE & OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2011 - 2021 1 Site Name Elvetham Heath LNR & Open Spaces Location Fleet, North Hampshire Head of Service John Elson Departmental Manager Adam Green Site Ranger Samantha Kerr Plan prepared by Timothy Ackroyd Plan updated by Leigh Wallace Plan edited by Leigh Wallace Date of draft April 2011 Date of final copy January 2012 Reviewed December 2020 Next Review Date Summer 2021 2 Content Table SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION & SITE INFORMATION .................................................... 5 1. Management Aims ...................................................................................................... 5 2. Location ....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Land Tenure ................................................................................................................ 6 4. Site Information ........................................................................................................... 6 5. Legal Obligations ......................................................................................................... 7 6. Healthy, Safe & Secure ............................................................................................... 7 7. MAP 1 – Site map Elvetham Heath Nature Reserve ................................................... 9 8. Site Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 9
    [Show full text]
  • Histoires Naturelles N°16 Histoires Naturelles N°16
    Histoires Naturelles n°16 Histoires Naturelles n°16 Essai de liste des Coléoptères de France Cyrille Deliry - Avril 2011 ! - 1 - Histoires Naturelles n°16 Essai de liste des Coléoptères de France Les Coléoptères forment l"ordre de plus diversifié de la Faune avec près de 400000 espèces indiquées dans le Monde. On en compte près de 20000 en Europe et pus de 9600 en France. Classification des Coléoptères Lawrence J.F. & Newton A.F. 1995 - Families and subfamilies of Coleoptera (with selected genera, notes, references and data on family-group names) In : Biology, Phylogeny, and Classification of Coleoptera. - éd. J.Pakaluk & S.A Slipinski, Varsovie : 779-1006. Ordre Coleoptera Sous-ordre Archostemata - Fam. Ommatidae, Crowsoniellidae, Micromathidae, Cupedidae Sous-ordre Myxophaga - Fam. Lepiceridae, Torridincolidae, Hydroscaphidae, Microsporidae Sous-ordre Adephaga - Fam. Gyrinidae, Halipidae, Trachypachidae, Noteridae, Amphizoidae, Hygrobiidae, Dytiscidae, Rhysodidae, Carabidae (Carabinae, Cicindelinae, Trechinae...) Sous-ordre Polyphaga Série Staphyliniformia - Superfam. Hydrophyloidea, Staphylinoidea Série Scarabaeiformia - Fam. Lucanidae, Passalidae, Trogidae, Glaresidae, Pleocmidae, Diphyllostomatidae, Geotrupidae, Belohinidae, Ochodaeidae, Ceratocanthidae, Hybrosoridae, Glaphyridae, Scarabaridea (Scarabaeinae, Melolonthinae, Cetoniinae...) Série Elateriformia - Superfam. Scirtoidea, Dascilloidea, Buprestoidea (Buprestidae), Byrrhoidea, Elateroidea (Elateridae, Lampyridae, Cantharidae...) + Incertae sedis - Fam. Podabrocephalidae, Rhinophipidae
    [Show full text]
  • Wolbachia Infection Among Coleoptera: a Systematic Review
    A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 9 March 2018. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/4471), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. Kajtoch Ł, Kotásková N. 2018. Current state of knowledge on Wolbachia infection among Coleoptera: a systematic review. PeerJ 6:e4471 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4471 Current state of knowledge on Wolbachia infection among Coleoptera: a systematic review Lukasz Kajtoch Corresp., 1 , Nela Kotásková 2 1 Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland 2 Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic Corresponding Author: Lukasz Kajtoch Email address: [email protected] Background. Despite great progress in studies on Wolbachia infection in insects, the knowledge about its relations with beetle species, populations and individuals, and the effects of bacteria on these hosts is still unsatisfactory. In this review we summarize the current state of knowledge about Wolbachia occurrence and interactions with Coleopteran hosts. Methods. An intensive search of the available literature resulted in the selection of 81 publications that describe the relevant details about Wolbachia presence among beetles. These publications were then examined with respect to the distribution and taxonomy of infected hosts and diversity of Wolbachia found in beetles. Sequences of Wolbachia genes (16S rDNA, wsp and ftsZ) were used for the phylogenetic analyses. Results. The collected publications revealed that Wolbachia has been confirmed in 197 beetle species and that the estimated average prevalence of this bacteria across beetle species is 38.3% and varies greatly across families and genera (0-88% infected members) and is much lower (c.
    [Show full text]