ARTICOLE DIN Publicaţii PERIODICE Cultură Anul XIX/Nr.12 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ARTICOLE DIN Publicaţii PERIODICE Cultură Anul XIX/Nr.12 2018 BIBLIOTECA NAÕIONALÅ A ROMÂNIEI BIBLIOGRAFIA NAÕIONALÅ ROMÂNÅ ARTICOLE DIN PUBLICAţII PERIODICE CULTURă anul XIX/nr.12 2018 EDITURA BIBLIOTECII NAÕIONALE A ROMÂNIEI BUCUREØTI BIBLIOTECA NAŢIONALĂ A ROMÂNIEI BIBLIOGRAFIA NAŢIONALĂ ROMÂNĂ Articole din publicaţii periodice. Cultură Bibliografie elaborată pe baza publicaţiilor din Depozitul Legal Anul XIX Nr. 12/2018 Editura Bibliotecii Naţionale a României BIBLIOGRAFIA NAŢIONALĂ ROMÂNĂ SERII ŞI PERIODICITATE Cărţi.Albume.Hărţi: bilunar Documente muzicale tipărite şi audiovizuale: anual Articole din publicaţii periodice. Cultură: lunar Publicaţii seriale: anual Românica: anual Teze de doctorat: semestrial Articole din bibliologie și știința informării: semestrial ©Copyright 2018 Toate drepturile sunt rezervate Editurii Bibliotecii Naţionale a României. Nicio parte din această lucrare nu poate fi reprodusă sub nicio formă, prin mijloc mecanic sau electronic sau stocat într-o bază de date, fără acordul prealabil, în scris, al redacţiei. Colectiv de redacţie: Roxana Pintilie Mihaela Vazzolla Anişoara Vlad Nicoleta Ştefan Florentina Cătuneanu Silvia Căpățână Corina Niculescu Monica Mioara Jichița Coperta: Constantin Aurelian Popovici ARTICOLE DIN PUBLICAŢII PERIODICE. CULTURĂ 3 Cuprins Cuprins ..................................................................................................................... 3 0 GENERALITĂȚI ............................................................................................... 6 004 Știința și tehnologia calculatoarelor. Calculatoare. Prelucrarea și procesarea datelor. Informatică aplicată. Internet. Web semantic. Inteligență artificială. Realitate virtuală ................................................................... 6 008 Civilizație. Cultură. Progres ............................................................................. 6 070 Ziare. Presă. Jurnalism ................................................................................... 15 1 FILOSOFIE. METAFIZICĂ. ONTOLOGIE. FILOSOFIA SPIRITULUI. OCULTISM. FEMINISM. PSIHOLOGIE. LOGICĂ. EPISTEMOLOGIE. FILOSOFIE MORALĂ. ETICĂ ........................................................................................................ 21 2 RELIGIE. TEOLOGIE ................................................................................... 23 3 ȘTIINȚE SOCIALE ......................................................................................... 27 311/316 Statistică. Demografie. Studiul populației. Emigrație, imigrație, deportări. Sociologie .............................................................................................. 29 32 Politică.............................................................................................................. 29 323.1 Minorități naționale și etnice ....................................................................... 34 330/339 Economie. Muncă. Finanțe. Turism. Comerț .......................................... 38 37 Educație. Învățământ. Timp liber ..................................................................... 38 39 Antropologie culturală. Etnografie. Obiceiuri. Tradiții. Datini. Mod de viață. Folclor ...................................................................................................... 40 6 ȘTIINȚE APLICATE. MEDICINĂ. TEHNOLOGIE .................................. 46 655 Industria poligrafică. Tipografii. Editură. Librării .......................................... 47 ARTE. RECREAȚIE. SPORT ............................................................................ 48 71/72 Urbanism. Arhitectură ................................................................................. 49 73/76 Arte plastice. Desen. Design. Pictură. Arte grafice ..................................... 49 77 Fotografie ......................................................................................................... 54 78 Muzică .............................................................................................................. 55 791 Cinematografie. Filme .................................................................................... 58 792 Teatru. Artă scenică. Reprezentații teatrale .................................................... 63 4 BIBLIOGRAFIA NAŢIONALĂ ROMÂNĂ 793 Divertismente, amuzamente de societate. Arta mișcării. Dans ....................... 80 8 LINGVISTICĂ. FILOLOGIE. LITERATURĂ ............................................ 80 81 Lingvistică. Limbi ............................................................................................ 80 82 Literatură .......................................................................................................... 82 82.09 Critică literară. Studii literare. Literatură comparată ................................... 83 821.11 Literatură în limbi germanice .................................................................... 86 821.111 Literatură engleză .................................................................................... 86 821.112.2 Literatură germană ............................................................................... 89 821.113.3 Literaturi germanice de nord (daneză, norvegiană, suedeză) ............... 90 821.131.1 Literatură italiană ................................................................................. 91 821.133.1 Literatură franceză și de limbă franceză ............................................... 91 821.134.2 Literatură spaniolă și de limbă spaniolă ............................................... 94 821.134.3 Literatură portugheză și de limbă portugheză ...................................... 95 821.135.1 Literatură română ................................................................................. 95 821.135.1(091) Istoria literaturii române ............................................................ 105 821.135.1-1 Literatură română. Poezie ............................................................... 106 821.135.1-2 Literatură română. Dramaturgie ...................................................... 129 821.135.1-3 Literatură română. Proză ................................................................. 130 821.135.1-4 Literatură română. Eseu .................................................................. 138 821.135.1-6 Literatură română. Scrisori. Corespondență .................................... 139 821.135.1-7 Literatură română. Satiră. Umor. Epigrame. Parodii ....................... 140 821.135.1-91 Literatură română populară ........................................................... 150 821.135.1-92 Literatură română. Publicistică ..................................................... 151 821.135.1-94 Literatură română. Memorii .......................................................... 154 821.135.1-95 Literatură română. Recenzii .......................................................... 157 821.135.1-992 Literatură română. Jurnale de călătorie ....................................... 182 821.135.1.09 Literatură română. Studii literare și critice .................................... 183 821.14 Literatură greacă ...................................................................................... 195 821.16 Literaturi slave/slavone ........................................................................... 196 821.17/.88 Alte literaturi ..................................................................................... 197 821.18 Literatură albaneză .................................................................................. 197 821.511.141 Literatură maghiară și de limbă maghiară ...................................... 198 9 GEOGRAFIE. BIOGRAFIE. ISTORIE ...................................................... 198 91 Geografie ........................................................................................................ 198 929 Studii biografice. Genealogie. Heraldică. Titluri nobiliare. Ordine cavalerești. Steaguri. Stindarde. Drapele .............................................................. 199 93/94 Istorie ........................................................................................................ 200 ARTICOLE DIN PUBLICAŢII PERIODICE. CULTURĂ 5 INDEX DE NUME ............................................................................................. 207 INDEX DE SURSE............................................................................................. 237 INDEX DE SUBIECT ........................................................................................ 242 6 BIBLIOGRAFIA NAŢIONALĂ ROMÂNĂ 0 GENERALITĂȚI 1. FARCAŞ, DAN D. Prejudecata invaziei şi cea a ajutorului [4] : [despre civilizaţiile avansate] / Dan D. Farcaş. - (Orizont SF). În: Curtea de la Argeş. An. 9, Nr. 5 (mai 2018). p. 29. 2. SUCIU, RADU Specia-fanion a Dunării : [despre sturioni] / Radu Suciu ; coordonator Sever Voinescu. - (Dosar Dilema). - În grupajul "România neîmblînzită". În: Dilema veche. An. 15, Nr. 743 (17-23 mai 2018). p. VIII. 3. Ştiaţi că? : [cultură generală]. În: Contraste culturale. An 3, Nr. 6 (apr.-iun. 2018). p. 59. 004 Știința și tehnologia calculatoarelor. Calculatoare. Prelucrarea și procesarea datelor. Informatică aplicată. Internet. Web semantic. Inteligență artificială. Realitate virtuală 4. DOBRESCU, FLAVIA Robotul care sună singur la frizerie şi Google I/O : [despre conferinţa de tehnologie din Mountain View] / Flavia Dobrescu. - (Explorări în virtualitatea imediată). În: Observator cultural. An. 19, Nr. 665 (17-23 mai 2018). p. 11. 008 Civilizație. Cultură. Progres 5. ANDREESCU, GABRIEL Doina Cornea în istoria recentă : [publicistică culturală]
Recommended publications
  • Anti-Corruption Policies Revisited Computer Assiste
    EU Grant Agreement number: 290529 Project acronym: ANTICORRP Project title: Anti-Corruption Policies Revisited Work Package: WP 6 Media and corruption Title of deliverable: D 6.1 Extensive content analysis study on the coverage of stories on corruption Computer Assisted Content Analysis of the print press coverage of corruption In Romania Due date of deliverable: 30 June, 2016 Actual submission date: 30 June, 2016 Authors: Natalia Milewski , Valentina Dimulescu (SAR) Organization name of lead beneficiary for this deliverable: UNIPG, UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PERUGIA Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme Dissemination level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) Co Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) only and do not reflect any collective opinion of the ANTICORRP consortium, nor do they reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the European Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. 1 CONTENTS 1. The Analysed Media p. 3 2. Most used keywords p.4 3. Most frequent words p.5 4. Word associations p. 13 5. Evolution over time p. 25 6. Differences among the observed newspapers p. 29 7. Remarks on the influence that the political, judicial and socio-cultural systems have on p. 33 the manner in which corruption is portrayed in Romanian media 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Exorcisms? the Memory of the Communist Security Apparatus
    285 Stefano Bottoni PhD University of Florence, Italy ORCID: 0000-0002-2533-2250 SCIENTIFIC EXORCISMS? ARTICLES THE MEMORY OF THE COMMUNIST SECURITY APPARATUS AND ITS STUDY IN ROMANIA AFTER 1989 Abstract This article discusses the institutional attempts to deal with the archival legacy of the Romanian communist security police, Securitate (1945–1989), during the democratic transition in post-communist Romania. The first part draws a short outline of Securitate’s history and activities as one of the main power instruments of the communist dictatorship. The second part of the article shows the development of political attitudes towards institutional attempts to deal with the communist past in the post-communist Romania. This paper describes the reluctant attitude of the ruling circles in the 1990s towards the opening of the Securitate archives and the lustration attempts. The formation of the National Council for the Study of Securitate Archives (Consiliul Național pentru Studierea Arhivelor Securității, CNSAS, legally established 1999) hardly changed the general situation: the archives of the Securitate were transferred to CNSAS with significant delays, and the 2008 ruling of the constitutional court limited its lustration competences. The establishment of the Institute for the Investigation of Communist Crimes and the Memory of the Romanian Exile (Institutul de Investigare a Crimelor Comunismului şi Memoria Exilului Românesc, IICCMER, established 2005) and formation in 2006 of the Presidential Commission for the Analysis of the Communist Dictatorship Institute of National Remembrance 2/2020 286 in Romania led by renowned political scientist Vladimir Tismăneanu together with the research and legal activities of CNSAS contributed to a broader evaluation of the communist regime (although its impact seems to be limited).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the European Union on Corruption in Romania
    The Impact of the European Union on Corruption in Romania Alexandru Hirsu Hamilton College Advisor: Alan Cafruny, Ph. D. Professor of Government Levitt Research Fellowship-Summer 2015 Abstract After the revolution of 1989, Romania confronted with high levels of corruption, and had a difficult time strengthening its democratic process. 10 years later, when the country became an official candidate for accession to the European Union (EU), the Romanian democracy saw hope for consolidation. However, despite the expertise and resources provided by the EU until 2007 in order for Romania to meet the acquis communautaire, the EU failed to bring about sustainable change. An incomplete European framework with guidelines tailored to Romania’s fragile democracy, and inadequate monitoring of the country’s political actions were the main causes for Romania’s slow democratic consolidation. The paper provides an analysis on Romania’s fight against corruption with a focus on the development of the anticorruption agencies, the rule of law, and the public administration from 2006 to 2012. Introduction Although scholarly attention upon corruption has grown over the past years and the number of soft and hard legislative tools to combat corruption has increased, corruption today still represents one of the main threats to the stability of democratic governments. In post- communist satellite states, in particular, corruption has remained a more prevalent issue. Leslie Holmes referred to it as “a rising tide of sleaze in ex-communist Europe,” claiming that “corruption has replaced communism as the scourge of Eastern Europe” (2013, 1163). As an ex- communist state itself, Romania has struggled endlessly with corruption over the past twenty five years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Novelty of the Romanian Press
    The Novelty of the Romanian Press Lorela Corbeanu School of Arts and Science Nottingham Trent University - UK [email protected] ABSTRACT High level political corruption has been a constant problem of post-communist Romania, long indicated by international bodies. This continuing situation raises questions about the capacity of the Romanian institutions to reform and fulfill their duties. Among these institutions, the Romanian Press occupies a special place due to its nature and to its connection with politics. This paper will offer an image of the relationship between the post- communist Romanian press and the political world and will point towards a few elements that make it a unique case that deserves to be carefully researched. KEYWORDS Mass-media, moguls, press, political corruption Romania. INTRODUCTION Romanian media moguls are different from In a general negative context, marked by other cases in the post-communist world. reports from the European Commission I will examine two different Romanian (EC Reports on Romania, 2011 – 2004) cases, Sorin Ovidiu Vantu and Dan and other international bodies, pointing to Voiculescu and compare them to other two the severe high level political corruption cases, Paval Rusko form Slovakia and problem, the role of the press as guaranty Vladimir Zelenzy from the Czech Republic. of democracy, transparency and state of The reason I have chosen these cases is to law becomes more relevant than ever. The exemplify how tight the relationship role the press plays in these kinds of between media and politics is in Romania. troubled situations is the ultimate test to I shall continue with a trip through the show the level and the quality of press in history of the Romanian press to underline a particular country.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Monitoring
    MEDIA MONITORING GRAPHIC REPORT SEPTEMBER – DECEMBER 2013 METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK PERIOD 1 September –31 December2013 MONITORED MEDIA 8 TV Stations News broadcasts of Antena 1, PROTV, Realitatea, TVR1 Newspapers Adevarul, Evenimentul Zilei, Jurnalul National, Romania Libera PUBLICATIONS SELECTION All publications related to political topics, such as state institutions, political parties and political leaders NUMBER OF ANALYZED PUBLICATIONS 3’375 MAIN INDICATORS Date of the publication, month, media, mentioned institutions, political parties, leaders, subject (who has expressed the opinion) and object (to whom the opinion has been expressed) 2 MOST MENTIONED POLITICIANS Victor‐Viorel Ponta 1084 Traian Băsescu 833 Crin Antonescu 520 Liviu Nicolae Dragnea 204 Sorin Oprescu 140 Valeriu Ştefan Zgonea 128 Dan Voiculescu 110 Eugen Gheorghe Nicolăescu 92 George Becali 84 Daniel Chițoiu 78 Ramona‐Nicole Mănescu 73 Elena Udrea 72 Varujan Vosganian 56 Dan‐Coman Şova 56 Daniel Constantin 50 Adrian Năstase 50 Radu Stroe 48 Emil Boc 46 Laura Codruța Kovesi 46 The data is represented in information units Monica Macovei 44 September-December 2013 3 MOST MENTIONED POLITICIANS as a % of publications in the respective media September-December 2013 4 MOST MENTIONED POLITICIANS as a % of publications in the respective media September-December 2013 5 EXPRESSED ATTITUDES TOWARDS TRAIAN BĂSESCU 140 0 Media Rating -3.8 120 ‐1 100 ‐2 80 ‐3 60 ‐4 40 ‐5 20 ‐6 0 ‐7 September October November December Positive Negative Media Rating 6 EXPRESSED ATTITUDES TOWARDS VICTOR-VIOREL
    [Show full text]
  • Populism in Central Europe
    Organiser: Objectives of this book are: The Association for International Affairs (AMO) is a Czech non-govern- ■ To examine the factors that feed the contemporary populist facet of Central European politics. mental organization that conducts research, and hosts educational pro- ■ To critically analyze the concept of populism: Is populism an inherent feature of politics? grams in the fields of international affairs, foreign policy and security ■ To discuss the historical and ideological roots of Central European populism: What has influenced studies. AMO, established in 1995, the formation of populism in Central Europe? is currently one of the leading institu- With kind support of: tions of its kind in the Czech ■ To ask whether the features shared by the Central European states outweigh their differences and Republic. whether there is such phenomenon as "Central European populism". The Research Center of AMO pro- Václav Nekvapil and Maria Staszkiewicz (editors) vides independent expert analyses, supports discussions at various levels and provides solutions for these issues. EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND IN PRAGUE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC POPULISM IN CENTRAL EUROPE Populism in Central Europe Editors: Václav Nekvapil and Maria Staszkiewicz Compiled by: Vendula Peisertová, Jiří Bednář, Lauren Trigero, Adéla Jurečková, Jitka Jurková, Lenka Ryjáčková and Vlaďka Votavová Translations: Gwendolyn Albert (Eva van de Rakt: Opening Remarks; Marie Gailová: Populism in the Context of "the Roma Question"; Jiří Musil: Reflections on Czech Populism; Václav Nekvapil: Populism and the Role of Political Parties in the Czech Republic and Lukáš Benda: Populism in Contemporary Hungarian Politics) Designed by: Tomáš Barčík – design studio Printed by: BCS, s.
    [Show full text]
  • Coming to Terms with the Communist Past in Romania: an Analysis of the Political and Media Discourse Concerning the Tismăneanu Report Alina Hogea*
    S TSS Vol 2 / Issue 2 16 Studies of Transition States and Societies Coming to Terms with the Communist Past in Romania: An Analysis of the Political and Media Discourse Concerning the Tismăneanu Report Alina Hogea* Abstract This paper looks at the public debates about the communist past, as triggered by the final report on the communist dictatorship in Romania (the Tismăneanu report) and its presidential endorsement in December 2006. The paper employs narrative and discourse analysis to examine the political reactions to the official condemnation of communism, as well as its reflection in several Romanian newspapers. The Tismăneanu report was meant to be a ‘redressive ritual’ that would provide closure to a traumatic past by retrospectively denouncing the meaning of communism, but instead it generated more public debates and political turmoil. This indicates that the contorted path taken by Romania to confront its communist past is not a finished process yet, but rather represents a dynamic field in which social ac- tors are fighting over which events and actors in the past should be collectively remembered, and espe- cially how they have to be represented in the collective memory of post-communist Romania.1 Keywords: collective memory, communism, Romania, politics, media discourse Introduction More than twenty years after the fall of communism in Eastern Europe, Romania is still struggling with its communist past. The Romanian ‘revolution’ remains a debated topic as there is no consensus among scholars, politicians, journalists, and lay people on what exactly happened in December 1989 (revolution or coup d’état) and on the name this political event should take (see more on this topic in Tileagă, 2008 and Văcărescu, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol
    International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol. XXIII No 2 2017 MASS-MEDIA COMMUNICATION IN ROMANIA Ioana-Narcisa CREȚU “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Romania [email protected] Abstract: Over 1200 new publications have appeared in Romania since the fall of communism. Some of them don’t exist anymore, but there always appear new ones. The Romanian newspaper market comprises about 1500 publications most of which appear on a weekly basis and 200 daily newspapers. Television is the most familiar source of information. The radio landscape has changed considerably - similar to the television - since 1990. Besides the public broadcaster offering several programs, there are over 150 private local radio stations and various other channels. Despite the diversity of the Romanian press, we cannot yet speak of a completely free press (see the report of the Freedom House organization). The limitations of media freedom and freedom of speech are related to media ownership, but also with gaps in the national legislation. This study aims to contribute to the advancement in the conceptualization of qualitative journalism by proposing to analyze different situations of failure in investigative journalism and identifying factors that conduct to limitation of media freedom. Keywords: freedom of the press, media landscape, Romania, qualitative journalism 1. Introduction impact of the media ownership (case 1 and 2) The limitations of media freedom and and quality journalism (case 3) in Romania. freedom of speech despite of pluralism of the press in former communist countries in 2. National Media Landscape Southeast of Europe, especially in Romania 2.1. Printed press and Moldavia, are related to media Over 1200 new publications have appeared in ownership as in [1], mentioned by Active Romania since the fall of communism.
    [Show full text]
  • New Ways of Censorship in Romanian Media
    New Ways of Censorship in Romanian Media Romania ranks poorly in quality media criteria * Polarized and politicized Development of the press Low Political polarization High Professionalism Low State intervention High * Based on Table 9.1 Pattern of Variation in Four Media Systems Dimension (Hallin and Mancini 2004: 299), Gross (2003) in Media an Democracy in CEE, Report on Romania by Pater Bajomi-Lazar 80% of the population use TV as their main source of information 600 TV licences (source: National Audiovisual Council) Advertizing market shrinkage: 2008 – 350 million Euro 2012 – 200 million Euro (source: Media Factbook) Media oligarchs with political links Intact Media Group owned by Dan Voiculescu and his family: a former Securitate member, the founder of the Conservative Party currently in power in coalition with Liberal Party and the Social Democrat Party Realitatea TV – owned by Sorin Ovidiu Vantu (now in prison); sold to former politician Cosmin Gusa Romania TV – owned by Sebastian Ghita, MP SDP OTV – owned by Dan Diaconescu, founder of the People‘s Party elected to Parliament in 2012 (now closed by National Audiovisual Council-CNA) B1 TV – owned by Paunescu family: known right-wing links Salary cuts Journalists’ job losses–about 6000 since 2010, mostly in the written press Economic pressures on journalists by companies or business figures to suppress publication of certain information Journalists working for free on the Internet How Romanian journalists are paid - Minimum wage on a legal labor contract (about 200 Euro per month) - Variable fees for articles, TV or Radio reports etc. Advantage: minimal taxes paid by employers Disadvantage: minimal rights for journalists (pensions, social support etc.) E.g.
    [Show full text]
  • From Multinationals to Business Tycoons: Media Ownership And
    HIJXXX10.1177/1940161212452449Ste 452449tkaThe International Journal of Press/Politics Research Article The International Journal of Press/Politics 17(4) 433 –456 From Multinationals to © The Author(s) 2012 Reprints and permission: Business Tycoons: Media sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1940161212452449 Ownership and Journalistic http://ijpp.sagepub.com Autonomy in Central and Eastern Europe Vaclav Stetka1 Abstract This article presents a comparative analysis of the changing patterns of media ownership in ten new EU member states from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and discusses the implications of these processes for media freedom and autonomy. Briefly outlining the history of internationalization of CEE media markets, it argues that the presence of Western-based multinational companies on the CEE media markets has been recently diminishing rather than further growing. In addition, a different type of actor has been gaining prominence on the CEE media map, unspotted or largely overlooked in most previous analyses, namely, local business elites acquiring stakes in news media. Combining secondary sources and field interviews with media experts and practitioners, this study explores the various practices of business and political instrumentalization of media by their local owners, often resulting in a constrained editorial independence and increasing intertwinement of the systems of media, politics, and economy in the region. Keywords media ownership, de-Westernization, media autonomy, media systems, instrumental- ization,
    [Show full text]
  • Carte De Telefon
    NOTĂ PRIVIND UTILIZAREA REŢELEI TELEFONICE A PALATULUI PARLAMENTULUI ¾ Informaţii privind numerotaţia telefonică şi utilizarea reţelei telefonice a Palatului Parlamentului se pot obţine de la operatoarele telefonice, formând cifra ″0″. ¾ Numărul unic de urgenţă care poate fi apelat numai de la telefoanele de interior din Palatul Parlamentului este 8112 APELAREA DIRECTĂ DIN EXTERIOR a unui post telefonic de interior din cadrul Palatului Parlamentului se va face astfel: Din reţeaua VODAFONE: • orice interior cuprins între numerele 1000 ÷ 2999 poate fi apelat din exterior formând prefixul ″0372.14″ urmat de numărul de interior dorit: 0372.14XXXX unde XXXX este numărul de interior (1000 ÷ 2999); Din reţeaua ORANGE: • orice interior cuprins între numerele 1000 ÷ 2999 poate fi apelat din exterior formând prefixul ″0750 08″ urmat de numărul de interior dorit: 0750 08 XXXX unde XXXX este numărul de interior (1000 ÷ 2999); Din reţeaua ROMTELECOM: • orice interior cuprins între numerele 1000 ÷ 2999 poate fi apelat din exterior formând prefixul ″021- 414 ″ urmat de numărul de interior dorit: 021- 414 XXXX unde XXXX este numărul de interior (1000 ÷ 2999); APELARE PRIN OPERATOARE se poate apela orice interior cuprins între numărul 1000 şi 3999 la numerele de centrală: 0372.14.1111; 0750.08.1111; 021-316.03.00; 021-414.1111; ACCESUL LA EXTERIOR se obţine formând cifra ″9″. În funcţie de reţeaua accesată Vodafone, Orange şi Romtelecom apelatul vă identifică conform numerotaţiei descrise mai sus. ATENŢIE! Pentru actualizarea cărţii de telefon sau eventuale corecţii vă rugăm să ne transmiteţi un email la adresa [email protected]. Informaţii suplimentare se pot obţine de la interiorul 1555 – Serviciul pentru Comunicaţii.
    [Show full text]
  • MAPPING DIGITAL MEDIA: ROMANIA Mapping Digital Media: Romania
    COUNTRY REPORT MAPPING DIGITAL MEDIA: ROMANIA Mapping Digital Media: Romania A REPORT BY THE OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS WRITTEN BY Manuela Preoteasa and Iulian Comanescu (lead reporters) Ioana Ava˘dani and Adrian Vasilache (reporters) EDITED BY Marius Dragomir and Mark Thompson (Open Society Media Program editors) EDITORIAL COMMISSION Yuen-Ying Chan, Christian S. Nissen, Dusˇan Reljic´, Russell Southwood, Michael Starks, Damian Tambini The Editorial Commission is an advisory body. Its members are not responsible for the information or assessments contained in the Mapping Digital Media texts OPEN SOCIETY MEDIA PROGRAM TEAM Biljana Tatomir, deputy director; Meijinder Kaur, program assistant; Morris Lipson, senior legal advisor; Miguel Castro, special projects manager; and Gordana Jankovic, director OPEN SOCIETY INFORMATION PROGRAM TEAM Vera Franz, senior program manager; Darius Cuplinskas, director 4 December 2010 Contents Mapping Digital Media ..................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 6 Context ............................................................................................................................................. 10 Social Indicators ................................................................................................................................ 12 1. Media Consumption: Th e Digital Factor
    [Show full text]