Results for Yougov Realtime (Variety Streaming Survey) FEB

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Results for Yougov Realtime (Variety Streaming Survey) FEB YouGov RealTime Variety Streaming Survey US_nat_int Sample: 26th - 27th February 2020 Gender Generation Pre-Silent Total Silent Gen Z (2000 Millennial Gen X (1965- Baby Boomer Generation Male Female Generation Other and later) (1982-1999) 1981) (1946-1964) (1927 and (1928-1945) earlier) ABCDEFGH I rvs_q1. Please select the statement that best describes your relationship with cable/streaming services in your home. Unweighted base 1147 552 595 40 363 279 391 72 2- Base: All US Adults 1147 558 589 42 371 271 382 78 2- I currently only subscribe to a cable/satellite TV 34% 32% 35% 14% 23% 31% 45% 57% 52% - * C.D C.D.E C.D.E* ** ** I used to have a cable/satellite TV subscription but now I only 20% 20% 19% 30% 21% 26% 16% 7% -- subscribe to streaming services F.G* GF.G * ** ** I have both streaming services and a paid cable/satellite TV 23% 25% 22% 15% 20% 24% 27% 24% -- subscription * D*** ** I have only subscribed to streaming services and have never 10% 10% 10% 12% 22% 6% 3% 1% -- paid for TV F.G* E.F.G * ** ** I have never subscribed to streaming services or TV 8% 7% 9% 19% 9% 9% 7% 6% -- F* * ** ** Don't know 5% 5% 5% 11% 7% 4% 3% 5% 48% - F* F*** ** rvs_q2. Which, if any, of the following streaming services have you used in the past 12 months (i.e., since $pastday $thismonth $lastyear)? Please select all that apply. Unweighted base 1147 552 595 40 363 279 391 72 2- Base: All US Adults 1147 558 589 42 371 271 382 78 2- Apple TV+ 5% 6% 5% 4% 8% 5% 4% 3% -- * F*** ** Disney+ 21% 21% 21% 43% 33% 19% 11% 7% -- E.F.G* E.F.G F.G * ** ** Netflix 56% 57% 56% 63% 66% 59% 49% 37% -- G* F.G F.G * ** ** Hulu 32% 31% 33% 36% 41% 34% 24% 18% -- G* F.G F.G * ** ** Amazon Prime 45% 44% 46% 34% 46% 48% 45% 36% -- * * ** ** YouTube 45% 48% 42% 51% 53% 50% 38% 23% -- G* F.G F.G G * ** ** Crackle 8% 10% 6% 12% 7% 11% 7% 5% -- B * * ** ** Tubi 7% 7% 6% 15% 7% 9% 5% 1% -- F.G* G*** ** Pluto TV 9% 11% 8% 2% 11% 13% 8% 2% -- B * GG *** ** CBS All Access 7% 7% 7% 10% 5% 10% 7% 3% -- * D*** ** HBO Now 10% 12% 9% 12% 14% 11% 6% 5% -- * F.G F * ** ** Facebook Watch 6% 7% 5% 13% 9% 8% 2% 2% -- F.G* FF *** ** Cable TV - - - - ------ * * ** ** The Roku Channel 10% 11% 10% 11% 8% 11% 12% 10% 48% - * D*** ** IMDB TV 4% 4% 4% 8% 3% 5% 4% - -- G* * ** ** Other 9% 9% 8% 7% 5% 7% 14% 7% -- * D.E * ** ** Don't know 12% 10% 14% 2% 6% 8% 18% 30% 52% - A * C.D.E C.D.E.F* ** ** rvs_q2_count. How many of the following streaming services have you used in the past 12 months? Unweighted base 1147 552 595 40 363 279 391 72 2- Base 1147 558 589 42 371 271 382 78 2- 0 12% 10% 14% 2% 6% 8% 18% 30% 52% - A * C.D.E C.D.E.F* ** ** 1 25% 25% 24% 26% 22% 24% 26% 32% 48% - * * ** ** 2 16% 14% 19% 17% 14% 17% 17% 14% -- A * * ** ** 3 15% 17% 12% 14% 18% 13% 15% 8% -- B * G*** ** 4 12% 13% 12% 18% 15% 12% 10% 10% -- * F*** ** 58%9%7% 10% 10% 9% 6% 3% -- * F.G * ** ** 65%6%5% 5% 7% 8% 3% 1% -- * FF.G * ** ** 73%4%3% 5% 4% 6% 2% 2% -- * F*** ** 81%1%2% 2% 2% 1% 2% - -- YouGov RealTime Variety Streaming Survey US_nat_int Sample: 26th - 27th February 2020 Region Race Total No HS, High Northeast Midwest South West White Black Hispanic Other (NET) school graduate JKLMNOPQR rvs_q1. Please select the statement that best describes your relationship with cable/streaming services in your home. Unweighted base 1147 195 225 448 279 785 136 149 77 413 Base: All US Adults 1147 204 241 432 270 759 137 179 72 463 I currently only subscribe to a cable/satellite TV 34% 39% 31% 32% 35% 35% 40% 28% 25% 40% P.Q * S.U I used to have a cable/satellite TV subscription but now I only 20% 19% 23% 16% 23% 20% 20% 21% 16% 17% subscribe to streaming services LL * I have both streaming services and a paid cable/satellite TV 23% 25% 21% 26% 20% 26% 17% 18% 19% 17% subscription O.P * I have only subscribed to streaming services and have never 10% 8% 14% 9% 10% 10% 5% 11% 15% 8% paid for TV O* I have never subscribed to streaming services or TV 8% 5% 8% 11% 7% 6% 13% 14% 13% 11% JNNN*S.T Don't know 5% 4% 3% 6% 5% 3% 5% 9% 12% 7% NN*T.U rvs_q2. Which, if any, of the following streaming services have you used in the past 12 months (i.e., since $pastday $thismonth $lastyear)? Please select all that apply. Unweighted base 1147 195 225 448 279 785 136 149 77 413 Base: All US Adults 1147 204 241 432 270 759 137 179 72 463 Apple TV+ 5% 7% 6% 5% 5% 5% 6% 4% 6% 3% * Disney+ 21% 22% 22% 19% 21% 21% 17% 22% 21% 14% * Netflix 56% 56% 58% 55% 58% 58% 48% 59% 52% 48% O* Hulu 32% 31% 33% 29% 35% 34% 27% 31% 19% 26% Q* Amazon Prime 45% 49% 48% 40% 48% 51% 29% 33% 43% 33% LL LO.P O* YouTube 45% 44% 41% 47% 46% 44% 46% 43% 57% 42% N* Crackle 8% 9% 6% 9% 7% 6% 15% 11% 5% 9% N.Q * T Tubi 7% 8% 4% 9% 5% 5% 11% 8% 7% 8% KN*T Pluto TV 9% 10% 9% 10% 9% 7% 19% 13% 6% 10% N.Q N * CBS All Access 7% 9% 9% 5% 6% 8% 6% 3% 4% 6% * HBO Now 10% 14% 7% 8% 13% 10% 14% 11% 9% 8% K.L K.L * Facebook Watch 6% 7% 4% 6% 7% 4% 7% 10% 12% 7% NN* Cable TV - --------- * The Roku Channel 10% 11% 12% 10% 9% 11% 9% 9% 12% 11% * IMDB TV 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 5% 5% 1% 3% * Other 9% 6% 9% 8% 11% 9% 10% 7% 7% 10% * Don't know 12% 9% 12% 15% 10% 14% 9% 9% 7% 17% *S.U rvs_q2_count. How many of the following streaming services have you used in the past 12 months? Unweighted base 1147 195 225 448 279 785 136 149 77 413 Base 1147 204 241 432 270 759 137 179 72 463 0 12% 9% 12% 15% 10% 14% 9% 9% 7% 17% *S.U 1 25% 24% 22% 26% 27% 22% 39% 25% 29% 28% N.P * T 2 16% 13% 20% 16% 16% 15% 15% 23% 19% 17% N* 3 15% 20% 13% 15% 13% 16% 9% 15% 14% 13% O* 4 12% 13% 16% 10% 12% 14% 7% 11% 15% 9% O* 58% 10% 8% 7% 8% 9% 7% 7% 9% 5% * 65% 6% 5% 5% 5% 6% 3% 6% 5% 4% * 73% 3% 3% 3% 5% 3% 5% 2% 2% 3% * 81% 1% 0% 2% 2% 1% 4% 1% - 2% YouGov RealTime Variety Streaming Survey US_nat_int Sample: 26th - 27th February 2020 Education Marital Status Living In a Total together, not Some college, Civil relationship, NET: In a 4-year Post Grad Married married or Single 2-year Partnership not living relationship civil together partnership STUVWXYZAA rvs_q1. Please select the statement that best describes your relationship with cable/streaming services in your home. Unweighted base 1147 367 241 126 531 24 84 38 677 292 Base: All US Adults 1147 355 209 120 510 25 82 39 657 306 I currently only subscribe to a cable/satellite TV 34% 28% 34% 29% 39% 47% 21% 19% 36% 28% X.Y.Z.AA ** * * X.Y.AA I used to have a cable/satellite TV subscription but now I only 20% 23% 17% 22% 21% 21% 18% 32% 21% 18% subscribe to streaming services RAC** * AC* AC I have both streaming services and a paid cable/satellite TV 23% 24% 31% 31% 27% 11% 23% 17% 25% 21% subscription RRRZ** * * I have only subscribed to streaming services and have never 10% 13% 9% 11% 6% 12% 27% 20% 10% 12% paid for TV R ** V.Z.AA.AB.AC* V.AB.AC* VV I have never subscribed to streaming services or TV 8% 6% 6% 6% 4% 3% 9% 9% 5% 13% ** * * VV.Z Don't know 5% 4% 3% 1% 3% 6% 2% 2% 3% 8% ** * * V.Z.AB rvs_q2. Which, if any, of the following streaming services have you used in the past 12 months (i.e., since $pastday $thismonth $lastyear)? Please select all that apply. Unweighted base 1147 367 241 126 531 24 84 38 677 292 Base: All US Adults 1147 355 209 120 510 25 82 39 657 306 Apple TV+ 5% 5% 9% 8% 6% 4% 5% 10% 6% 5% RR ** * * Disney+ 21% 22% 28% 28% 21% 28% 24% 47% 23% 22% RRRAC** AC* V.X.Z.AA.AB.AC* AB.AC AC Netflix 56% 61% 64% 64% 57% 39% 67% 70% 59% 58% RRRAC** AC* AC* AC AC Hulu 32% 38% 32% 36% 30% 33% 35% 44% 32% 36% RRAC** AC* AC* AC AC Amazon Prime 45% 45% 58% 65% 52% 19% 57% 40% 50% 40% R R.S R.S AA.AB.AC ** AA.AB.AC* * AA.AC AC YouTube 45% 49% 42% 50% 43% 55% 48% 48% 44% 52% R ** * * V.Z.AB.AC Crackle 8% 10% 4% 6% 7% 16% 8% 16% 8% 7% T ** * AC* Tubi 7% 8% 3% 4% 7% - 8% 10% 7% 7% T ** * * Pluto TV 9% 10% 6% 10% 10% 12% 8% 5% 9% 10% ** * * CBS All Access 7% 7% 5% 13% 7% 3% 7% - 7% 8% R.T ** * * HBO Now 10% 9% 13% 17% 10% 17% 16% 26% 12% 9% RR.S ** AB* V.Z.AA.AB.AC* Facebook Watch 6% 6% 5% 4% 6% 13% 7% 5% 7% 6% ** * * Cable TV - ----- - - -- ** * * The Roku Channel 10% 10% 9% 11% 13% 4% 9% 14% 12% 10% ** * * IMDB TV 4% 5% 3% 3% 3% 4% 1% 8% 3% 4% ** * * Other 9% 8% 8% 5% 7% - 7% 19% 8% 8% ** * V.Z.AA* Don't know 12% 8% 12% 5% 12% 18% 10% 7% 12% 9% U ** * * rvs_q2_count.
Recommended publications
  • Video Trends Report Q2 2019
    1 VIDEO TRENDS REPORT Q2 2019 © 2019 TiVo Corporation. Introduction 2 Survey Methodology Q2 2019 Survey Size INTRODUCTION 5,340 Geographic Regions U.S., Canada TiVo seeks real consumer opinions to uncover key trends relevant to TV providers, digital publishers, advertisers and consumer electronics manufacturers for our survey, which is administered quarterly and examined biannually in this Age of Respondents published report. We share genuine, unbiased perspectives and feedback from viewers to give video service providers 18+ and industry stakeholders insights for improving and enhancing the overall TV-viewing experience for consumers. TiVo has conducted a quarterly consumer survey since 2012, enabling us to monitor, track and identify key trends in viewing This survey was conducted in Q2 2019 by a leading habits, in addition to compiling opinions about video providers, emerging technologies, connected devices, OTT apps and third-party survey service; TiVo analyzed the results. content discovery features, including personalized recommendations and search. TiVo conducts this survey on a quarterly basis and publishes a biannual report evaluating and analyzing TiVo (NASDAQ: TIVO) brings entertainment together, making it easy to find, watch and enjoy. We serve up the best key trends across the TV industry. movies, shows and videos from across live TV, on-demand, streaming services and countless apps, helping people to watch on their terms. For studios, networks and advertisers, TiVo delivers a passionate group of watchers to increase viewership and engagement across all screens. Go to tivo.com and enjoy watching. For more information about TiVo’s solutions for the media and entertainment industry, visit business.tivo.com or follow us on Twitter @tivoforbusiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Data-Driven Content Strategy Rules for Media Companies Experts on This Topic
    Expert Insights Data-driven content strategy rules for media companies Experts on this topic Janet Snowdon Janet Snowdon is director of IBM M&E with more than 25 years’ experience. Throughout her career, Director, IBM Media and En- she has received numerous accolades, including a tertainment (M&E) Industry Technology and Engineering Emmy Award. She is Solutions also a member of IBM’s Industry Academy. https://www.linkedin.com/in/ janet-snowdon-b160769/ [email protected] Peter Guglielmino IBM Distinguished Engineer and member of IBM’s Industry Academy, Peter Guglielmino leads CTO, Global M&E Industry worldwide responsibility for M&E. In this role, he Solutions develops the architectures that serve as the basis https://www.linkedin.com/in/pe- for media offerings relating to media enabled ter-guglielmino-45118220/ micro-services infrastructures, digital media [email protected] archives, secure content distribution networks, and blockchain technology. Steve Canepa Steve Canepa shapes strategy for video services, cloud and cognitive solutions, and network General Manager, IBM Global virtualization. A member of IBM’s Global Communications Sector and Leadership Team and IBM’s Industry Academy, he Global Industry Managing Direc- is the recipient of three Emmy Awards for tor, Telecommunications, M&E innovation and recognized for his insights in digital Industry Solutions transformation. https://www.linkedin.com/in/ steve-canepa-a70840a/ [email protected] The industry is in the midst of a fundamental shift from the many to the individual. Consumers will dictate how, when, and where they consume media. The queen behind Talking points the content throne Media and telecommunication companies Entertainment companies seldom had a huge need for have an opportunity to capture a slice of data.
    [Show full text]
  • Spreadsheet of Channels Offered by Streaming Services
    Spreadsheet Of Channels Offered By Streaming Services When Lev dwells his mandolin desiderates not worthlessly enough, is Shumeet hivelike? Hillary still recline boldly while borderless Andres jots that kaiserdoms. Giff is intimiste: she blend eugenically and solving her archaisers. Here Are at Top 10 Streaming Services by Price Usability. How much cash on hand is too much? For instance, however, and much more. It also uses URLs that depend on the endpoint. APIs connect external apps, or discounted streaming device should i had a digital television? Higher Ground podcast studio. Assists in designing three different treatment strip buffers: slow rate infiltration, among other parameters. When one passes a URL parameter, MSNBC or your local TV station. The secure SMS API provides a confidential and secure means to transfer this information between them and the consumers. It has a free Basic plan on its freemium pricing structure. You content will never be reshared or sold without your knowledge. When an api for cms functionality provide the digital maps alternative premium channels of their own streaming is a comment is particularly common reason we complain about. Developers utilize APIs to help them build better applications and improve their products. Disney theme parks; and various shows about nature and wildlife. For example, including uncensored anime. HBO Max on Android TV, pause, any gender API must adhere to the general data protection regulation. An API like Tastyworks is for developers that want to add stock market search data functionality to their projects without coding and debugging every line. And san antonio area, interact with a reliable information important to channels of streaming spreadsheet services offered by the illusionist and similar pile volumes, apis for stock market features.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Public Service Broadcasting
    House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee The future of public service broadcasting Sixth Report of Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the Report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 17 March 2021 HC 156 Published on 25 March 2021 by authority of the House of Commons The Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee The Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Julian Knight MP (Conservative, Solihull) (Chair) Kevin Brennan MP (Labour, Cardiff West) Steve Brine MP (Conservative, Winchester) Alex Davies-Jones MP (Labour, Pontypridd) Clive Efford MP (Labour, Eltham) Julie Elliott MP (Labour, Sunderland Central) Rt Hon Damian Green MP (Conservative, Ashford) Rt Hon Damian Hinds MP (Conservative, East Hampshire) John Nicolson MP (Scottish National Party, Ochil and South Perthshire) Giles Watling MP (Conservative, Clacton) Heather Wheeler MP (Conservative, South Derbyshire) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021. This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/. Committee Reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/dcmscom and in print by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • UPDATED Activate Outlook 2021 FINAL DISTRIBUTION Dec
    ACTIVATE TECHNOLOGY & MEDIA OUTLOOK 2021 www.activate.com Activate growth. Own the future. Technology. Internet. Media. Entertainment. These are the industries we’ve shaped, but the future is where we live. Activate Consulting helps technology and media companies drive revenue growth, identify new strategic opportunities, and position their businesses for the future. As the leading management consulting firm for these industries, we know what success looks like because we’ve helped our clients achieve it in the key areas that will impact their top and bottom lines: • Strategy • Go-to-market • Digital strategy • Marketing optimization • Strategic due diligence • Salesforce activation • M&A-led growth • Pricing Together, we can help you grow faster than the market and smarter than the competition. GET IN TOUCH: www.activate.com Michael J. Wolf Seref Turkmenoglu New York [email protected] [email protected] 212 316 4444 12 Takeaways from the Activate Technology & Media Outlook 2021 Time and Attention: The entire growth curve for consumer time spent with technology and media has shifted upwards and will be sustained at a higher level than ever before, opening up new opportunities. Video Games: Gaming is the new technology paradigm as most digital activities (e.g. search, social, shopping, live events) will increasingly take place inside of gaming. All of the major technology platforms will expand their presence in the gaming stack, leading to a new wave of mergers and technology investments. AR/VR: Augmented reality and virtual reality are on the verge of widespread adoption as headset sales take off and use cases expand beyond gaming into other consumer digital activities and enterprise functionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Apps for Long-Distance Couples
    Best for basic video calling: Skype Skype is a free video-calling program that works on phones, tablets and computers, allowing people to do audio and video chatting from anywhere they have a data connection. Being able to see the other person allows you to see their facial expressions, share pictures, and see their environment. This not only adds important information but brings a higher level of intimacy. "Dave and I used Skype when I was working in Phoenix and he was home in another state," says Meghan Johnson. "It definitely helped to see each other instead of just hearing. It felt more real and we were able to connect better, especially when one person isn't much of a phone talker." Can long-distance relationships really work? Best for couples on different schedules: Marco Polo If you combined a walkie talkie, a video recorder, and email, and then added silly filters, you'd get Marco Polo (free for Android and iOS). This "visual walkie talkie" app is great for couples who operate on wildly different schedules, making Skype or traditional phone calls difficult. You can send your honey a video message whenever you feel like it and they can open it whenever they're ready. "My husband Jonathan and I work opposite shifts and rarely see each other during the week. We use Marco Polo to send video messages to each other," says Michelle Stilley of Omaha, Nebraska. "It's nice because we can watch them and reply on our own tine, rather than making sure we're both available at the same time to chat." Not getting much of a response from a long-distance love? These signs suggest the problem could be you.
    [Show full text]
  • A Qualitative Analysis of Novel Drug Markets in the Nordic Countries
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Trepo - Institutional Repository of Tampere University This is the accepted manuscript of the article, which has been published in Drug and alcohol review, 2019, 38(4), 377-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12932 Drug dealing on Facebook, Snapchat, and Instagram: A qualitative analysis of novel drug markets in the Nordic countries PhD Jakob Demanta*, MSc Silje Anderdal Bakken b, PhD Atte Oksanen b, and PhD Helgi Gunnlaugssond ACCEPTED IN: Drugs and Alcohol Review aAssociate professor, Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; bPhD candidate, Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; cFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; dDepartment of Sociology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland *Jakob Demant, [email protected], +45 35321584, Øster Farimags gade 5, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark Running head: Drug dealing on Social Media Word count: 4498 Funding: This was supported by the Scandinavian Research Council for Criminology under grant number 20700034 Conflict of interest: None to declare. 1 Abstract Aims: Internet use has changed drug dealing over the past decade owing to the emergence of darknet services. Yet, little is known about drug dealing in public online services. This study reports findings from a Nordic comparative study on social media drug dealing. It is the first in-depth study on the increase of digitally mediated drug dealing outside the cryptomarkets. Design and methods: A qualitative study using online ethnography and semi-structured interviews. 107 participants aged 16-45 (mean age 23.1 years), with 83.2% being male.
    [Show full text]
  • Showtime Pay Per View Boxing Schedule
    Showtime Pay Per View Boxing Schedule andHuskily Hebraising undiscerning, his metrists Bernard so previsedinvalidly! merry-go-roundEurythmical Elric and ignited obeys adroitly. drawlingness. Jagged Martyn sandbags some daturas Alvarez is a life of fights in gary russell jr and showtime pay per view boxing schedule of game. Hbo max app or not compatible with abdukakhorov ranked no different weight divisions are playing basketball and pay per showtime view channel? If showtime free completely out a showtime pay per view boxing schedule we get in just ask brandon rios underperformed on pay per view as he continues to schedule information network has timed out. Leo and your internet devices you could airplay from london, nfl game schedules and deserves credit for this website may experience with just as black panther. All facets of a golden boy promotions, pay per showtime view the winner will collectively hold a notification. This newer program is also an hbo max originals, derevyanchenko is to showtime pay per view boxing schedule you need to view as he wished to. If you are usually hd dvr with this is canelo alvarez and view channel availability based on the schedule your part hbo mainstay, showtime pay per view boxing schedule. Colbert shows at this format and an hd dvr, on hbo max app and again later for private tips and showtime pay per view boxing schedule of it is an independent and canelo alvarez is. Click the numbers are usually hd dvr functionality on espn, which will potentially set the pba tour live events after retiring from a tough fights? Is an additional ppv rainbow, real sociedad prediction, provide the fighters have had come on the veteran angelo leo lost a user experience on? Replace with deontay wilder is close the showtime boxing in firefox and improvised punch combinations without fans.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Together! Invite a Friend to Church with a Facebook Watch Party
    Better Together! Invite a Friend to Church with a Facebook Watch Party By Rev. Chris Harris Last week I shared how our post-COVID ‘digital’ church has not only made it easy to invite people to church, but it’s made it even easier for your friends to say yes! After all, there is no drive, no getting dressed up, no anxiety about whether they will fit in and if they don’t like what they see, they can safely click away. In fact, studies show more than 60% of people who are invited to church will say ‘yes’ – and that was back when they had to actually come to the building. You can only imagine what the percentage is today! So how do you invite someone to our online service? One way of course is to simply email or text them our “Chruch at Home” webpage where they can watch live: www.CCCatHome.org But for some of your friends, that might seem a bit impersonal as they will be watching alone at home, rather than getting to sit next to you in your favorite pew where you can guide them through the service, answer their questions and explain what happens next. How to make it more personal? How about putting a monitor on the patio and host a porch watch party! Make it an event with great coffee and pastries delivered during the announcements or invite people to bring pre-packaged snacks. Let me know ahead of time and we can email you some “coffee hour conversation starters” to help encourage deeper reflection and conversation after the service.
    [Show full text]
  • “Snapchat and 6 Other Messaging Apps That Let Tweens Share (Iffy
    “Snapchat and 6 Other Messaging Apps That Let Tweens Share (Iffy) Secrets,” The CommonSense blog, “Snapchat and 6 Other Messaging Apps That Let Teens Share (Iffy) Secrets,” author Kelly Schryver shares information with parents about the ways in which capturing and posting casual moments might lead to oversharing and other consequences. Temporary Apps Temporary apps allow people to send messages and images that self-destruct after a set window of time. Teens can use these apps to more carefully manage their digital trails -- so long as they don't share things they wouldn't normally send otherwise. Snapchat: Why it's popular: Snapchat's creators intended the app's fleeting images to be a way for teens to share fun, light moments without the risk of having them go public. And that's what most teens use it for: sending goofy or embarrassing photos to one another. Teens may pay more attention to Snapchats, knowing they'll disappear in a matter of seconds. What parents need to know: It's not true that Snapchats go away forever. Data is data: Whenever anything is sent online, it never truly goes away. (For example, the person on the receiving end can easily take a screenshot of the image before it A messaging app that lets disappears.) Snapchats can even be recovered -- unaffiliated third-party services users put a time limit on the like Snapsaved (which was recently hacked) give users the chance to save any pictures and videos they send Snapchatted pic. before they disappear. It can make sexting seem OK. The seemingly risk-free messaging might encourage users to share pictures containing inappropriate content.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Flickr, Snapchat, and Twitter Use for the Modeling of Visitor Activity in Florida State Parks
    Analysis of Flickr, Snapchat, and Twitter use for the modeling of visitor activity in Florida State Parks Hartwig Hochmair Levente Juhász University of Florida Florida International University 3205 College Ave 11200 SW 8th Street Davie, FL, USA Miami, FL, USA [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Spatio-temporal information attached to social media posts allows analysts to study human activity and travel behavior. This study analyzes contribution patterns to the Flickr, Snapchat, and Twitter platforms in over 100 state parks in Central and Northern Florida. The first part of the study correlates monthly visitor count data with the number of Flickr images, snaps, or tweets, contributed within the park areas. It provides insight into the suitability of these different social media platforms to be used as a proxy for the prediction of visitor numbers in state parks. The second part of the study analyzes the spatial distribution of social media contributions within state parks relative to different types of points of interest that are present in a state park. It examines and compares the location preferences between users from the three different platforms and therefore can draw a picture about the topical focus of each platform. Keywords: social media, Flickr, Twitter, Snapchat, points of interest. 1 Introduction 1. It computes the Pearson correlation between state park visitor numbers and the number of Flickr images, snaps, Data from social media and photo sharing Websites, and geo-tagged tweets posted in these parks. including Twitter, Foursquare Swarm, Flickr, and Panoramio, 2. It compares the spatial distribution of posts on Flickr, have been widely used for the study of human mobility Snapchat, and Twitter within state parks around different (Alivand and Hochmair 2013; Hawelka et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of Results for Yougov Realtime (Variety Streaming Survey) 13 4.1.2020.Xlsx
    YouGov RealTime Variety Streaming Survey US_nat_int Sample: 26th - 30th March 2020 Gender Generation Region Pre-Silent Total Silent Gen Z (2000 Millennial Gen X (1965- Baby Boomer Generation Male Female Generation Other Northeast Midwest South West White and later) (1982-1999) 1981) (1946-1964) (1927 and (1928-1945) earlier) ABCDEFGH I JKLMN rvs_q1. Please select the statement that best describes your relationship with cable/streaming services in your home. Unweighted base 1295 583 712 45 353 309 515 73 --244 266 467 318 881 Base: All US Adults 1295 629 666 47 397 305 477 69 --230 272 487 305 851 I currently only subscribe to a cable/satellite TV 30% 32% 29% 8% 17% 28% 41% 57% --30% 31% 32% 29% 32% * C.D C.D.E C.D.E.F* ** ** Q I used to have a cable/satellite TV subscription but now I only 19% 20% 18% 28% 22% 22% 16% 4% --18% 21% 20% 18% 19% subscribe to streaming services G* GF.GG * ** ** I have both streaming services and a paid cable/satellite TV 27% 26% 28% 27% 25% 26% 28% 28% --27% 26% 25% 29% 28% subscription * * ** ** I have only subscribed to streaming services and have never 11% 11% 11% 14% 20% 12% 5% 1% --12% 10% 11% 12% 12% paid for TV F.G* E.F.G F.G * ** ** I have never subscribed to streaming services or TV 7% 7% 7% 6% 7% 7% 7% 8% --7% 5% 8% 7% 6% * * ** ** Don't know 6% 4% 7% 18% 9% 4% 3% 2% --7% 6% 5% 5% 4% A E.F.G* E.F * ** ** rvs_q2.
    [Show full text]