DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic Impact Analysis (2001 – 2013) Toronto, Ontario

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic Impact Analysis (2001 – 2013) Toronto, Ontario Economic Impact Analysis (2001 – 2013) Toronto, Ontario Prepared for: Waterfront Toronto April 26, 2013 Waterfront Toronto – Economic Impact Analysis (2001‐2012) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................................... I BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. I PHASE 1 – RETURN ON INVESTMENT ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ II Synopsis ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ii Research Findings ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ii PHASE 2 – LAND AND REAL ESTATE VALUE ........................................................................................................................................................................................... III Synopsis ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................iii Research Findings ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ iv PHASE 3 – PRIVATE SECTOR ATTRACTION ............................................................................................................................................................................................. VI Synopsis ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ vi Research Findings ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... vii OVERALL SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. XIII 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT SCOPE ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2.1 Phase 1 – Return on Investment .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.2 Phase 2 – Land and Real Estate Value .................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Phase 3 – Private Sector Attraction ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2 STUDY AREA AND WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PRECINCTS ............................................................................................... 4 2.1 STUDY AREA ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT PRECINCTS ................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2.1 East Bayfront .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 West Don Lands ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 Central Waterfront ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.4 Lower Don Lands ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 ADJOINING NEIGHBOURHOODS ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Waterfront Toronto – Economic Impact Analysis (2001‐2012) 3 PHASE 1 – RETURN ON INVESTMENT ............................................................................................................................................ 15 3.1 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 3.2 ECONOMIC IMPACT APPROACH .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 3.2.1 urbanMetrics Economic Impact Model .............................................................................................................................................................................. 21 3.2.2 Estimation of Economic Impacts .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 3.3 SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACTS ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 24 4 PHASE 2 – LAND AND REAL ESTATE VALUE ................................................................................................................................ 28 4.1 QUALITATIVE RESEARCH INTERVIEWS ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 4.1.1 Scope of Interviews ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 4.1.2 Summary of Key Themes .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 4.2 HISTORIC REAL ESTATE INFORMATION .................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 4.2.1 Total Value and Volume of Resale Transactions ........................................................................................................................................................... 36 4.2.2 Price Per Square Foot ($PSF) Levels ................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 4.2.3 Real Estate Value Analysis Summary ................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 4.3 HISTORIC LAND VALUE INFORMATION ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3. Description of the Potentially Affected Environment
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3. Description of the Potentially Affected Environment The purpose of Chapter 3 is to present an overview of the environment potentially affected by the SWP to create familiarity with issues to be addressed and the complexity of the environment likely to be affected by the Project. All aspects of the environment within the Project Study Area (see Figure 2- 1 in Chapter 2) relevant to the Project and its potential effects have been described in this chapter. The chapter is divided into three sections which capture different components of the environment: 1. Physical environment: describes the coastal and geotechnical processes acting on the Project Study Area; 2. Natural environment: describes terrestrial and aquatic habitat and species; and, 3. Socio-economic environment: describes existing and planned land use, land ownership, recreation, archaeology, cultural heritage, and Aboriginal interests. The description of the existing environment is based on the information from a number of studies, which have been referenced in the relevant sections. Additional field surveys were undertaken where appropriate. Where applicable, future environmental conditions are also discussed. For most components of the environment, existing conditions within the Project Area or Project Study Area are described. Where appropriate, conditions within the broader Regional Study Area are also described. 3.1 Physical Environment Structures and property within slopes, valleys and shorelines may be susceptible to damage from natural processes such as erosion, slope failures and dynamic beaches. These processes become natural hazards when people and property locate in areas where they normally occur (MNR, 2001). Therefore, understanding physical natural processes is vital to developing locally-appropriate Alternatives in order to meet Project Objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • 3131 Lower Don River West Lower Don River West 4.0 DESCRIPTION
    Lower Don River West Environmental Study Report Remedial Flood Protection Project 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF LOWER DON 4.1 The Don River Watershed The Don River is one of more than sixty rivers and streams flowing south from the Oak Ridges Moraine. The River is approximately 38 km long and outlets into the Keating Channel, which then conveys the flows into Toronto Harbour and Lake Historic Watershed Ontario. The entire drainage basin of the Don urbanization of the river's headwaters in York River is 360 km2. Figure 4.1 and Figure 4.2, on the Region began in the early 1980s and continues following pages, describe the existing and future today. land use conditions within the Don River Watershed. Hydrologic changes in the watershed began when settlers converted the forests to agricultural fields; For 200 years, the Don Watershed has been many streams were denuded even of bank side subject to intense pressures from human vegetation. Urban development then intensified settlement. These have fragmented the river the problems of warmer water temperatures, valley's natural branching pattern; degraded and erosion, and water pollution. Over the years often destroyed its once rich aquatic and during the three waves of urban expansion, the terrestrial wildlife habitat; and polluted its waters Don River mouth, originally an extensive delta with raw sewage, industrial/agricultural marsh, was filled in and the lower portion of the chemicals, metals and other assorted river was straightened. contaminants. Small Don River tributaries were piped and Land clearing, settlement, and urbanization have buried, wetlands were "reclaimed," and springs proceeded in three waves in the Don River were lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Has Been Updated to Reflect the Specific Additions/Revisions Outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, Dated November, 2017
    DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY This Revised Final Environmental Project Report – Volume 5 has been updated to reflect the specific additions/revisions outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, dated November, 2017. As such, it supersedes the previous Final version dated October, 2017. The report dated October, 2017 (“Report”), which includes its text, tables, figures and appendices) has been prepared by Gannett Fleming Canada ULC (“Gannett Fleming”) and Morrison Hershfield Limited (“Morrison Hershfield”) (“Consultants”) for the exclusive use of Metrolinx. Consultants disclaim any liability or responsibility to any person or party other than Metrolinx for loss, damage, expense, fines, costs or penalties arising from or in connection with the Report or its use or reliance on any information, opinion, advice, conclusion or recommendation contained in it. To the extent permitted by law, Consultants also excludes all implied or statutory warranties and conditions. In preparing the Report, the Consultants have relied in good faith on information provided by third party agencies, individuals and companies as noted in the Report. The Consultants have assumed that this information is factual and accurate and has not independently verified such information except as required by the standard of care. The Consultants accept no responsibility or liability for errors or omissions that are the result of any deficiencies in such information. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are valid as of the date of the Report and are based on the data and information collected by the Consultants during their investigations as set out in the Report. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are based on the conditions encountered by the Consultants at the site(s) at the time of their investigations, supplemented by historical information and data obtained as described in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Peer Review EA Study Design Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport BBTCA
    Imagine the result Peer Review – EA Study Design Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport (BBTCA) Runway Expansion and Introduction of Jet Aircraft Final Report August 2015 BBTCA Peer Review of EA Study Design Report ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Background 1-1 1.2 Current Assignment 1-3 2.0 PEER REVIEW APPROACH 2-1 2.1 Methodology 2-1 3.0 FINDINGS OF PEER REVIEW OF AECOM’S DRAFT STUDY DESIGN REPORT 3-1 3.1 EA Process and Legislation 3-1 3.2 Public Consultation & Stakeholder Engagement 3-1 3.3 Air Quality 3-2 3.4 Public Health 3-5 3.5 Noise 3-6 3.6 Natural Environment 3-10 3.7 Socio-Economic Conditions 3-11 3.8 Land Use & Built Form 3-14 3.9 Marine Physical Conditions and Water Quality 3-15 3.10 Transportation 3-15 3.11 Archaeology & Cultural Heritage 3-18 4.0 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS 4-1 APPENDIX A Presentation Given to the Working Group (22 June 2015) B Presentation of Draft Phase I Peer Review Report Results (13 July 2015) i BBTCA Peer Review of EA Study Design Report ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AERMOD Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System ARCADIS ARCADIS Canada Inc. BBTCA Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport CALPUFF Meteorological and Air Quality Monitoring System CCG Canadian Coast Guard CEAA Canadian Environmental Assessment Act CO Carbon Monoxide COPA Canadian Owners and Pilots Association dBA Decibel Values of Sounds EA Environmental Assessment EC Environment Canada GBE Government Business Enterprise GWC Greater Waterfront Coalition HEAT Habitat and Environmental Assessment Tool INM Integrated Noise Model Ldn Day-Night
    [Show full text]
  • The Fish Communities of the Toronto Waterfront: Summary and Assessment 1989 - 2005
    THE FISH COMMUNITIES OF THE TORONTO WATERFRONT: SUMMARY AND ASSESSMENT 1989 - 2005 SEPTEMBER 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank the many technical staff, past and present, of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Ministry of Natural Resources who diligently collected electrofishing data for the past 16 years. The completion of this report was aided by the Canada Ontario Agreement (COA). 1 Jason P. Dietrich, 1 Allison M. Hennyey, 1 Rick Portiss, 1 Gord MacPherson, 1 Kelly Montgomery and 2 Bruce J. Morrison 1 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, ON, M3N 1S4, Canada 2 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Lake Ontario Fisheries Management Unit, Glenora Fisheries Station, Picton, ON, K0K 2T0, Canada © Toronto and Region Conservation 2008 ABSTRACT Fish community metrics collected for 16 years (1989 — 2005), using standardized electrofishing methods, throughout the greater Toronto region waterfront, were analyzed to ascertain the current state of the fish community with respect to past conditions. Results that continue to indicate a degraded or further degrading environment include an overall reduction in fish abundance, a high composition of benthivores, an increase in invasive species, an increase in generalist species biomass, yet a decrease in specialist species biomass, and a decrease in cool water Electrofishing in the Toronto Harbour thermal guild species biomass in embayments. Results that may indicate a change in a positive community health direction include no significant changes to species richness, a marked increase in diversity in embayments, a decline in non-native species in embayments and open coasts (despite the invasion of round goby), a recent increase in native species biomass, fluctuating native piscivore dynamics, increased walleye abundance, and a reduction in the proportion of degradation tolerant species.
    [Show full text]
  • L U X U R Y B Y T H E L A
    THIS PAGE GETS SPOT GLOSS www.benchmarksignaturerealty.com LUXURY BY THE LAKE 06 TORONTO’S HARBOUR, FRONT & CENTRE 52 HAVE A LAKE NIGHT 92 THE FUTURE OF HARBOURFRONT Discover year-round events Check out these popular spots This neighbourhood’s momentum is and activities on the waterfront. for divine drinks and dining. showing no signs of slowing down. THIS PAGE GETS FLOOD GLOSS VARNISH Sugar Beach AQUABELLA MAG_V17_Sep 20 revisions.indd 1-2 2016-09-20 5:05 PM LUXURY BY THE LAKE Exclusive waterfront homes from $1.0 million. AQUABELLA is a place where open concept goes far beyond the concept. Where a dynamic expression of large windows blur the boundary between the building and its setting. Providing an immersion in city and sky, AQUABELLA is uniquely designed to follow the contours of the lake with grand terraces, bordered by vast panoramas. Amid opportunities for living, working, shopping, dining and entertaining, AQUABELLA is luxury by the lake. tridel.com Tridel®, Tridel Built for Life® and Tridel Built Green. Built for Life® are registered trademarks of Tridel and used under license. ©Tridel 2016. All rights reserved. Buildings and views are not to scale. Features and finishes may vary by suite designs. Specifications and prices subject to change without notice. Illustrations are artist's concepts. E.&O.E. September 2016. AQUABELLA MAG_V17_Sep 20 revisions.indd 3-4 2016-09-20 5:05 PM HTO Park CONTENTS 06 TORONTO’S HARBOUR, 42 A PET’S PARADISE 66 A COMMUNITY CONNECTED FRONT & CENTRE Places you will love as much as Living in the new age of connectivity Discover year-round events and your furry friends.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report
    2019 Annual Report Zibi Ottawa, ON / Gatineau, QC Dream (TSX:DRM) is an award- winning Canadian real estate company with approximately $9 billion of assets under management in North America and Europe. Dream is a leading developer of exceptional office and residential assets in Toronto, owns stabilized income generating assets in both Canada and the U.S., and has an established and successful asset management business, inclusive of $9 billion of assets under management across three TSX listed trusts and numerous partnerships. We also develop land and residential assets in Western Canada for immediate sale. Dream expects to generate more recurring income in the future as its urban development properties are completed and held for the long term. Dream has a proven track record for being innovative and for our ability to source, structure and execute on compelling investment opportunities. Letter to Shareholders Over the last 14 months, we have delivered a total return of 83% and redevelopment properties, our mixed-use developments at to shareholders and repurchased over $130 million of stock. Brightwater, the Canary and Distillery Districts and the West While we are pleased with the increase in market price year- Don Lands. As the development manager for Dream Office REIT, over-year, we believe that continuing to buy back stock under we are leading the rezoning and intensification process for the our normal course issuer bid is a good use of capital and a driver REIT’s redevelopment assets. This includes 250 Dundas St. West, of value creation. As of February 21, 2020, we held $743 million which recently obtained council zoning approval to convert the units at fair value in Dream Office REIT and Dream Alternatives, property to a multi-use development comprising commercial which accounts for over 60% of our current market cap before office, multi-residential rental and retail components.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT for ACTION City Planning Division – Study Work Program
    PH12.3 REPORT FOR ACTION City Planning Division – Study Work Program Date: January 2, 2020 To: Planning and Housing Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Wards: All Folder Number: 19 120442 STE 10 TM SUMMARY This report provides the City Planning Division's annual update on its Study Work Program. The report outlines the Division's 62 completions and approvals in 2019. These completions demonstrate the Division's commitment to advancing the Strategic Priorities identified in the City of Toronto Corporate Strategic Plan, 2019, through a proactive approach to prioritizing and managing a range of complex planning issues, including deliverables related to: Maintaining and creating housing that's affordable: In partnership with the Housing Secretariat and CreateTO, in 2019 City Planning advanced the Housing Now initiative to create affordable housing and mixed-use, mixed-income, transit-oriented communities on City-owned sites. City Planning also advanced policies related to Inclusionary Zoning and dwelling rooms, and zoning related to second suites and municipal shelters for Council approval. Keeping Toronto moving: Following the Province's introduction of Bill 107 - Getting Ontario Moving Act, City Planning has and will continue to play an important role in the articulation and advancement of city-building objectives related to provincial priority transit projects. City Planning also advanced Transportation Master Plans in support of large studies including the Golden Mile Secondary Plan and an evaluation of the King Street Transit Pilot. Investing in people and neighbourhoods: City Planning supports the development of complete communities through large-scale city building and infrastructure studies. Council's adoption of the Don Mills Crossing, Laird in Focus and Sherway Area Secondary Plans establishes local planning frameworks to guide ongoing investment in employment opportunities and community services and facilities to support existing and future residents in these areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Redeveloping the Distillery District, Toronto
    Place Differentiation: Redeveloping the Distillery District, Toronto by Vanessa Kirsty Mathews A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Geography University of Toronto © Copyright by Vanessa Kirsty Mathews 2010 Place Differentiation: Redeveloping the Distillery District, Toronto Doctor of Philosophy Vanessa Kirsty Mathews, 2010 Department of Geography University of Toronto Abstract What role does place differentiation play in contemporary urban redevelopment processes, and how is it constructed, practiced, and governed? Under heightened forms of interurban competition fueled by processes of globalization, there is a desire by place- makers to construct and market a unique sense of place. While there is consensus that place promotion plays a role in reconstructing landscapes, how place differentiation operates – and can be operationalized – in processes of urban redevelopment is under- theorized in the literature. In this thesis, I produce a typology of four strategies of differentiation – negation, coherence, residue, multiplicity – which reside within capital transformations and which require activation by a set of social actors. I situate these ideas via an examination of the redevelopment of the Gooderham and Worts distillery, renamed the Distillery District, which opened to the public in 2003. Under the direction of the private sector, the site was transformed from a space of alcohol production to a space of cultural consumption. The developers used a two pronged approach for the site‟s redevelopment: historic preservation and arts-led regeneration. Using a mixed method approach including textual analysis, in-depth interviews, visual analysis, and site observation, I examine the strategies used to market the Distillery as a distinct place, and the effects of this marketing strategy on the valuation of art, history, and space.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Town Toronto East
    ST NTO EA TORO TOWN OLD Come and explore Toronto’s historic heart. N Sherbourne S Sac 5 kvi Geo ll Queen Street East e St rge Sum Bri Stre 4 ght Pow tre ach et Stre et er St Stre ree et St. t et Richmond Street East La Ber wre keley nce St Str 2 3 reet East ee Sac g Street t Adelaide Street East Kin kvi lle Str Jar Parli Bayv ee vis 6 t ament iew Cyp Street 1 ue Av St ven ress by Eri King Street East 7 enue Street Der n A n St ter St Eas ree E W t 14 Front Street East Don Ri Ove Tri 13 12 nity rend 11 ver St St reet The Esplanade 9 Mill Street Che 1O rry Geo 8 Street rge Scadding Ave Hah St South n Pl Longboat Avenue Lakeshore Blvd S Legend_ The Daniel Brooke Building 6 Little Trinity Church & Parish House 11 The Berkeley Street Theatre Bus, Streetcar Route Architectural/ 1 Historical 2 The Bank of Upper Canada 7 Enoch Turner School House 12 Canadian Opera Company Municipal Parking Interest 3 Toronto’s First Post Office 8 The Distillery Historic District 13 The Lorraine Kimsa Theatre Outdoor Art, Museum for Young People d Nixon 9 First Parliament Buildings Site One-way Street Statues & St. Paul’s Basilica 14 The Toronto Sun Mural Structures 4 10 Crombie Park Greenspace 5 Dominion Square riting: Edwar W EAST RONTO OWN TO OLD T Come and explore Toronto’s historic heart. Points of interest 1 The Daniel Brooke Building (King outskirts of town and the only Roman 9 First Parliament Buildings Site, Street East & Jarvis Street) Built in Catholic parish between Kingston and Parliament Square The block bounded 1833 for merchant Daniel Brooke, Windsor.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance and Funding Options for Project: Under Gardiner and Class Environmental Assessment for Crossing of Fort York Boulevard
    EX16.12 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Governance and Funding Options for Project: Under Gardiner and Class Environmental Assessment for Crossing of Fort York Boulevard Date: June 20, 2016 To: Executive Committee Deputy City Manager, Cluster A From: Deputy City Manager, Cluster B Wards: Ward 19 – Trinity-Spadina Ward 20 – Trinity-Spadina Reference P:\2015\ClusterB\WF\EX16003 Number: SUMMARY This report recommends a governance and funding model for the programming, operations and maintenance of capital associated with Project: Under Gardiner (or "the Project"). Announced last year, the Project has been made possible by a $25 million donation from the Judy and Wilmot Matthews Foundation (the "Donor"). To date, the City has received $3 million, with the balance of funding to be provided once Council approves a governance and funding model satisfactory to the City, Donor and Waterfront Toronto, the parties to the Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") for the Project. The full vision for the Project involves the transformation of a 10-acre, 1.75-kilometre linear area beneath the elevated Gardiner Expressway into a new east-west multi-use trail and network of public amenities extending from west of Strachan Avenue to Spadina Avenue. The first phase involves the 5.8-acre area between Strachan Avenue and Bathurst Street with a trail connection extending to Spadina Avenue. Planned elements for the first phase include the "Strachan Gate Timber Pier" structure which provides performance and spectator space, a pedestrian and cycling bridge across Fort York Boulevard, a 450-metre ice skating plaza and programming components to activate the public space on a year-round basis.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2018 Activity Calendar
    Activity Calendar July 2017 You must sign up for all activities www.studyquest.net/studentarea.htm Day Date Name Description Cost Meeting place Sun 1 ! Happy Canada Day!! ! Celebrate Canada's birthday at Downsview Park with live entertainment, games, face painting, Sun 1 Canada Day Celebration! FREE College Station @ 5PM and an incredible fireworks display! Mon 2 No Class today! See you on Tuesday! Kensington Market and Check out the delicious (and cheap!) food selection, art, crafts, live performances, and more! An Tu e s 3 FREE/ PYOW Quest Lounge @ 4PM China Town awesome place to pick up souvenirs! Watch the Toronto Blue Jays face off against the New York Mets! Experience the excitement of Wed 4 Blue Jays Game $30 Union Station @ 6:30PM watching a baseball game in Canada! Have a blast as you cheer for your favourite team! Come out to Quest’s first ever Karaoke event! Have fun and sing your heart out while your friends Thurs 5 Karaoke at Quest! FREE Quest Lounge @3PM cheer you on! Taste hamburgers from the best burger chefs in Toronto! Located on West Island! Come and enjoy Fri 6 BurgerMania on West Island! FREE/ PYOW Quest Lounge @3PM the live music, desserts, beer (19+), and of course, BURGERS! Vegetarian options also available. Come out to this Award winning event! Enjoy the non-stop Salsa dancing and latin music in the Sat 7 Salsa on Saint Clair Street FREE St. Clair Station @6PM streets alongside some of the best local and international entertainers! Afrofest Is the Largest Free African Music Festival In North America! Enjoy the incredible diversity Sun 8 Afrofest 2018 FREE Woodbine Station @4PM of African music while celebrating and learning about African culture.
    [Show full text]