Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 206/Friday, October 23, 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 206 / Friday, October 23, 2020 / Proposed Rules 67469 necessary for safety in air commerce. (e) Reason (3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any This regulation is within the scope of This AD was prompted by a report that a service information referenced in EASA AD that authority because it addresses an welding quality issue has been identified in 2020–0169R1 that contains RC procedures unsafe condition that is likely to exist or the gimbal joint of the air bleed duct located and tests: Except as required by paragraph at each wing-to-pylon interface; the inner (j)(2) of this AD, RC procedures and tests develop on products identified in this must be done to comply with this AD; any rulemaking action. ring of a gimbal had deformed to an oval shape, which could lead to cracking caused procedures or tests that are not identified as Regulatory Findings by direct contact between metal parts. The RC are recommended. Those procedures and FAA is issuing this AD to address this tests that are not identified as RC may be The FAA determined that this condition, which could lead to hot bleed air deviated from using accepted methods in proposed AD would not have federalism leakage in the pylon area, and possibly result accordance with the operator’s maintenance implications under Executive Order in loss of the pneumatic system and exposure or inspection program without obtaining 13132. This proposed AD would not of the wing structure to high temperatures, approval of an AMOC, provided the have a substantial direct effect on the and lead to reduced structural integrity of the procedures and tests identified as RC can be States, on the relationship between the airplane. done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or national Government and the States, or (f) Compliance changes to procedures or tests identified as on the distribution of power and Comply with this AD within the RC require approval of an AMOC. responsibilities among the various compliance times specified, unless already (k) Related Information levels of government. done. For the reasons discussed above, I (1) For information about EASA AD 2020– certify this proposed regulation: (g) Requirements 0169R1, contact the EASA, Konrad- Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory telephone +49 221 8999 000; email ADs@ action’’ under Executive Order 12866, AD: Comply with all required actions and compliance times specified in, and in easa.europa.eu; internet (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation accordance with, European Union Aviation www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this in Alaska, and Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2020–0169R1, EASA AD on the EASA website at https:// (3) Will not have a significant dated August 19, 2020 (‘‘EASA AD 2020– ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this economic impact, positive or negative, 0169R1’’). material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 on a substantial number of small entities (h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020–0169R1 under the criteria of the Regulatory South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this Flexibility Act. (1) Where EASA AD 2020–0169R1 refers to its effective date, this AD requires using the material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. This List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 effective date of this AD. material may be found in the AD docket on (2) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD the internet at https://www.regulations.gov Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 2020–0169R1 does not apply to this AD. by searching for and locating Docket No. safety, Incorporation by reference, FAA–2020–0965. Safety. (i) No Reporting Requirement (2) For more information about this AD, Although the service information contact Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace The Proposed Amendment referenced in EASA AD 2020–0169R1 Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, Accordingly, under the authority specifies to submit certain information to the International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 manufacturer, this AD does not include that South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; delegated to me by the Administrator, requirement. telephone and fax 206–231–3218; the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part [email protected]. 39 as follows: (j) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this Issued on October 15, 2020. PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS AD: Gaetano A. Sciortino, DIRECTIVES (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, (AMOCs): The Manager, Large Aircraft Compliance & Airworthiness Division, ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 Section, International Validation Branch, Aircraft Certification Service. continues to read as follows: FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs [FR Doc. 2020–23235 Filed 10–22–20; 8:45 am] for this AD, if requested using the procedures BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with § 39.13 [Amended] 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY the following new airworthiness information directly to the Large Aircraft directive (AD): Section, International Validation Branch, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade send it to the attention of the person Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA–2020–0965; Bureau identified in paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Project Identifier MCAI–2020–01068–T. Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR- 27 CFR Part 9 (a) Comments Due Date [email protected]. Before using any [Docket No. TTB–2020–0011; Notice No.196] The FAA must receive comments by approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal December 7, 2020. RIN 1513–AC63 inspector, the manager of the responsible (b) Affected ADs Flight Standards Office. Proposed Establishment of the Goose None. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain instructions Gap Viticultural Area (c) Applicability from a manufacturer, the instructions must AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and This AD applies to all Airbus SAS Model be accomplished using a method approved Trade Bureau, Treasury. A350–941 and –1041 airplanes, certificated by the Manager, Large Aircraft Section, in any category. International Validation Branch, FAA; or ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. EASA; or Airbus SAS’s EASA Design (d) Subject Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Air Transport Association (ATA) of the DOA, the approval must include the and Trade Bureau (TTB) proposes to America Code 36, Pneumatic. DOA-authorized signature. establish the approximately 8,129-acre VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Oct 22, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23OCP1.SGM 23OCP1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS 67470 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 206 / Friday, October 23, 2020 / Proposed Rules ‘‘Goose Gap’’ viticultural area in Benton definitive viticultural areas and regulate AVA that are consistent with the County, Washington. The proposed the use of their names as appellations of existing AVA and explains how the viticultural area lies entirely within the origin on wine labels and in wine proposed AVA is sufficiently distinct established Yakima Valley and advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB from the existing AVA and therefore Columbia Valley viticultural areas. TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth appropriate for separate recognition; designates viticultural areas to allow standards for the preparation and and vintners to better describe the origin of submission of petitions for the • A detailed narrative description of their wines and to allow consumers to establishment or modification of the proposed AVA boundary based on better identify wines they may American viticultural areas (AVAs) and USGS map markings. purchase. TTB invites comments on this lists the approved AVAs. Goose Gap Petition proposed addition to its regulations. Definition TTB received a petition from Alan DATES: TTB must receive comments by Busacca, on behalf of the Goose Gap December 22, 2020. Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines Wine Grower’s Association, proposing ADDRESSES: You may electronically a viticultural area for American wine as the establishment of the ‘‘Goose Gap’’ submit comments to TTB on this a delimited grape-growing region having AVA. The proposed Goose Gap AVA is proposal, and view copies of this distinguishing features, as described in located in Benton County, Washington, document, its supporting materials, and part 9 of the regulations, and a name and lies entirely within the established any comments TTB receives on it within and a delineated boundary, as Yakima Valley AVA (27 CFR 9.69) and Docket No. TTB–2020–0011 as posted established in part 9 of the regulations. Columbia Valley AVA (27 CFR 9.74). on Regulations.gov (https:// These designations allow vintners and The proposed Goose Gap AVA contains www.regulations.gov), the Federal consumers to attribute a given quality, approximately 8,129 acres and has 1 e-rulemaking portal. Please see the reputation, or other characteristic of a winery and 2 commercially-producing ‘‘Public Participation’’ section of this wine made from grapes grown in an area vineyards covering a total of more than document below for full details on how to the wine’s geographic origin. The 1,800 acres. The petition states that, in to comment on this proposal via establishment of AVAs allows vintners 2017, the two vineyards harvested more Regulations.gov or U.S. mail, and for to describe more accurately the origin of than 7,000 tons of grapes, and the full details on how to view or obtain their wines to consumers and helps winery produced about 50,000 cases of copies of this document, its supporting consumers to identify wines they may wine from those grapes.