DOCSLIB.ORG

Ilaşcu and Others V Moldova and Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ilaşcu and Others V Moldova and Russia CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE OF ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA (Application no. 48787/99) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 8 July 2004 ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA JUDGMENT i Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 PROCEDURE ................................................................................................. 2 1. The admissibility proceedings .................................................... 2 2. The proceedings on the merits .................................................... 3 (a) Written observations of the parties ................................................. 3 (b) The witness hearings ................................................................... 4 (c) The documentary evidence ........................................................... 5 THE FACTS ................................................................................................ 6 I. THE APPLICANTS .................................................................................... 6 II. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FACTS ............................................................ 6 III. GENERAL BACKGROUND TO THE CASE................................................. 8 A. The dissolution of the USSR and the Moldovan- Transdniestrian conflict over the break-away of Transdniestria .... 8 1. The dissolution of the USSR, the break-away of Transdniestria and Moldovan independence ............................... 8 2. The armed conflict (1991-92) ................................................... 11 3. Events after the armed conflict ................................................. 22 B. The presence of the army of the Russian Federation and its personnel in Transdniestria after the agreement of 21 July 1992 .............................................................................................. 26 1. ROG troops and equipment in Transdniestria .......................... 26 (a) Before ratification of the Convention by the Russian Federation ........... 26 (b) After ratification of the Convention by the Russian Federation .......... 30 2. Relations between the ROG and the “MRT” ............................ 32 C. Economic, political and other relations between the Russian Federation and Transdniestria ...................................................... 33 1. Before ratification of the Convention by the Russian Federation, on 5 May 1998 ....................................................... 33 2. After ratification of the Convention by the Russian Federation ................................................................................. 35 ii ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA JUDGMENT D. Moldovan-Transdniestrian relations ............................................. 37 1. Before ratification of the Convention by Moldova, on 12 September 1997 .................................................................... 37 2. After ratification of the Convention by Moldova ..................... 38 IV. THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE .............................. 41 A. The applicants' arrest, pre-trial detention and conviction ............. 41 1. The applicants' arrest ................................................................ 41 2. Detention of the first three applicants on the premises of the 14th Army ................................................................................. 43 3. Detention in the remand centre of Tiraspol police headquarters and transfer to prison during the trial .................. 45 4. The applicants' trial and conviction .......................................... 46 B. Events subsequent to the applicants' conviction; Mr Ilaşcu's release ........................................................................................... 47 C. The applicants' detention after conviction .................................... 49 1. The conditions of detention ...................................................... 50 2. Ill-treatment .............................................................................. 54 D. Steps taken up to May 2001 to secure the applicants' release ...... 55 E. Mr Ilaşcu's release on 5 May 2001 ................................................ 56 F. Steps taken after May 2001 to secure the other applicants' release ........................................................................................... 57 G. International reactions to the applicants' conviction and detention ....................................................................................... 58 V. INTERNATIONAL LAW, DOMESTIC LAW AND OTHER RELEVANT AGREEMENTS .................................................................................... 59 THE LAW ................................................................................................. 69 I. WHETHER THE APPLICANTS COME WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA ...................................................................... 69 ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA JUDGMENT iii A. Arguments submitted to the Court ................................................ 69 1. The Moldovan Government ...................................................... 69 2. The Government of the Russian Federation ............................. 71 3. The applicants ........................................................................... 71 4. The Romanian Government, third-party intervener ................. 72 B. The Court's assessment ................................................................. 72 1. General principles ..................................................................... 72 (a) The concept of “jurisdiction” ...................................................... 72 (b) State responsibility for a wrongful act ........................................... 75 2. Application of the above principles .......................................... 75 3. The concept of positive obligations .......................................... 77 4. Whether Moldova discharged its positive obligations .............. 78 II. WHETHER THE APPLICANTS COME WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ............................................................................ 82 A. Arguments submitted to the Court ................................................ 82 1. The Government of the Russian Federation ............................. 82 2. The Moldovan Government ...................................................... 85 3. The applicants ........................................................................... 86 4. The Romanian Government, third-party intervener ................. 87 B. The Court's assessment ................................................................. 88 1. General principles ..................................................................... 88 2. Application of the above principles .......................................... 88 (a) Before ratification of the Convention by the Russian Federation ........ 88 (b) After ratification of the Convention by the Russian Federation .......... 90 III. THE COURT'S JURISDICTION RATIONE TEMPORIS ...................................... 92 A. The complaint under Article 6 of the Convention ........................ 93 B. The complaints under Articles 3, 5 and 8 of the Convention ....... 93 C. The complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 ......................... 93 D. Mr Ilaşcu's complaint under Article 2 of the Convention ............ 93 IV. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION ..................... 94 A. Arguments submitted to the Court ................................................ 94 B. The Court's assessment ................................................................. 95 iv ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA JUDGMENT V. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION ...................... 96 A. Arguments submitted to the Court ................................................ 96 B. The Court's assessment ................................................................. 96 1. General principles ..................................................................... 96 2. Application of the above principles in the present case ............ 99 (a) Mr Ilaşcu ................................................................................ 99 (b) The other three applicants: conditions of detention and treatment during detention ...................................................................... 101 (i) Mr Ivanţoc ........................................................................ 101 (ii) Mr Leşco and Mr Petrov-Popa ............................................. 102 VI. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE CONVENTION ................... 103 VII. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE CONVENTION ................. 106 VIII. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 .................. 107 IX. ALLEGED FAILURE TO OBSERVE ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION ..... 107 X. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION .............................. 110 A. Damage ....................................................................................... 110 B. Costs and expenses ..................................................................... 113 C. Default interest ............................................................................ 113 OPERATIVE PROVISIONS ............................................................................... 114 PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CASADEVALL JOINED BY JUDGES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Russia You Never Met
    The Russia You Never Met MATT BIVENS AND JONAS BERNSTEIN fter staggering to reelection in summer 1996, President Boris Yeltsin A announced what had long been obvious: that he had a bad heart and needed surgery. Then he disappeared from view, leaving his prime minister, Viktor Cher- nomyrdin, and his chief of staff, Anatoly Chubais, to mind the Kremlin. For the next few months, Russians would tune in the morning news to learn if the presi- dent was still alive. Evenings they would tune in Chubais and Chernomyrdin to hear about a national emergency—no one was paying their taxes. Summer turned to autumn, but as Yeltsin’s by-pass operation approached, strange things began to happen. Chubais and Chernomyrdin suddenly announced the creation of a new body, the Cheka, to help the government collect taxes. In Lenin’s day, the Cheka was the secret police force—the forerunner of the KGB— that, among other things, forcibly wrested food and money from the peasantry and drove some of them into collective farms or concentration camps. Chubais made no apologies, saying that he had chosen such a historically weighted name to communicate the seriousness of the tax emergency.1 Western governments nod- ded their collective heads in solemn agreement. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank both confirmed that Russia was experiencing a tax collec- tion emergency and insisted that serious steps be taken.2 Never mind that the Russian government had been granting enormous tax breaks to the politically connected, including billions to Chernomyrdin’s favorite, Gazprom, the natural gas monopoly,3 and around $1 billion to Chubais’s favorite, Uneximbank,4 never mind the horrendous corruption that had been bleeding the treasury dry for years, or the nihilistic and pointless (and expensive) destruction of Chechnya.
    [Show full text]
  • Billing Code 4810-Al Department
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/30/2020 and available online at example.com/d/2020-28863, and on govinfo.govBILLING CODE 4810-AL DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of Foreign Assets Control Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List based on OFAC’s determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for effective date(s). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 202-622-2420; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; or Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202- 622-4855. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic Availability The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC’s website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac). Notice of OFAC Action(s) On December 23, 2020, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below. Individual: 1. KAZAKEVICH, Henadz Arkadzievich (Cyrillic: КАЗАКЕВIЧ, Генадзь Аркадзьевiч) (a.k.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Russian Democracy and US-Russian Relations
    After Chechnya: Threats to Russian Democracy and U.S.-Russian Relations ARIEL COHEN Introduction : All Politics Is Local , Al¡ Foreign Policy Is Domestic Half a year alter Russian tanks rolled into Chechnya, the future of Russian democracy and free markets is under threat. The internal situation in Russia bears a direct influence on Russia's relations with the outside world and the United States. While the world's leaders gather in Moscow to celebrate the victory over Nazism, Russian Foreign Minister Andrei Kozyrev is calling for the use of force to "protect" Russian co-ethnics living outside the borders of the Russian Federation. Kozyrev's declarations go beyond mere rhetoric. Russia is introducing its new 58th field army in the Northern Caucasus, in clear and conscious violation of the Conventional Forces Europe (CFE) Treaty, a centerpiece of post-Cold War European security. If Russia is not planning an agressive action either against Ukraine or its Transcaucasus neighbors, why does it need to revise upwards the CFE limitations of 164 tanks and 414 artillery systems? Why was General Alexander Lebed, a self-proclaimed restorer of the old Soviet Union and Commander of the l4th Army in Moldova, applauding Kozyrev? Chechnya became the testing ground for the new Russian policy, both foreign and domestic. The people who engineered it, the so-called Party of War in Moscow, are watching for reactions at honre and abroad to this version of the "last thrust South." The West is facing its greatest challenge since the collapse of communism: how to deal with the Russia that is emerging from under the rubble.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Issues of Military Spec
    CURRENT ISSUES OF MILITARY SPECIALISTS TRAINING IN THE SECURITY AND DEFENCE SECTOR UNDER CONDITIONS OF HYBRID THREATS Instytut Bezpieczeństwa i Rozwoju Międzynarodowego Boguslaw Pacek, Hennadii Pievtsov, Anatolii Syrotenko CURRENT ISSUES OF MILITARY SPECIALISTS TRAINING IN THE SECURITY AND DEFENCE SECTOR UNDER CONDITIONS OF HYBRID THREATS Warsaw 2021 Reviewer Prof. dr hab. Andrzej Glen Scientific editors: Boguslaw Pacek – Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland Hennadii Pievtsov – Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University, Ukraine Anatolii Syrotenko – National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi, Ukraine Language editing and proofreading Foreign Languages Scientific and Research Centre of National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi Computer typing Valeriya Kirvas © Copyright by Instytut Bezpieczeństwa i Rozwoju Międzynarodowego, 2021 ISBN 978-83-66676-10-7 Wydawnictwo Instytutu Bezpieczeństwa i Rozwoju Międzynarodowego https://instytutbirm.pl 1st Edition CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................... 10 Military Scientific Aspects of Counteracting Hybrid Aggression: the Experience of Ukraine Victor Bocharnikov, Sergey Sveshnikov Systemic features of military-political situation in Ukraine during 2012-2018 ............................................................ 14 Volodymyr Bohdanovych, Oleksandr Dublian, Oleksandr Peredrii, Valerii Dobrohurskyi Comprehensive model of counteracting hybrid aggression process
    [Show full text]
  • Government of National Accord Libya, Office of the Prime Minister
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 02/27/2020 5:04:35 PM •— NEW ESU Center on the _ AMERICA Future of War Arizona State University V 'J A November 2019 Decoding the Wagner Group: Analyzing the Role of Private Military Security Contractors in Russian Proxy Warfare Candace Rondeaux Last edited on November 05, 2019 at 11:41 a.m. EST Disseminated by Mercury Public Affairs, LLC, a registered foreign agent, on behalf of the Government of National Accord Libya, Office of the Prime Minister. More information is on file with the Department of Justice, Washington, DC. Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 02/27/2020 5:04:35 PM Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 02/27/2020 5:04:35 PM Acknowledgments The author would like to thank Peter Bergen and It is worth noting that some of the best research Daniel Rothenberg, co-directors of the New America/ produced about the Wagner Group and Russian Arizona State University Future of War project for private military security contractors has been their support throughout the production of this paper. produced by anonymous open source intelligence A deep debt of gratitude Is owed to David Sterman researchers, human rights activists and investigative for applying his sharp editorial eye to the text and journalists in Ukraine, Russia, Syria, and elsewhere. sharing his analytical Intuition throughout the This paper would not be what it is without their brave research for this report. I also benefited greatly efforts to hold power to account and the extensive Sergey Sukhankln’s research on Russian military advice and help of so many people, many of whom affairs and the Wagner Group and his direct could not be named here due to security concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Politica Externă a Republicii Moldova De La Independenţă La Președinţia Lui Vladimir Voronin
    Politica externă a Republicii Moldova De la independenţă la președinţia lui Vladimir Voronin Volumul I Ileana Racheru P R M D V V V I Bucureşti, 2020 Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României RACHERU, ILEANA Politica externă a Republicii Moldova : de la independenţă la preşedenţia lui Vladimir Voronin / Ileana Racheru. - Bucureşti : Monitorul Oicial R.A., 2020- vol. ISBN 978-606-035-050-7 Vol. 1. - 2020. - Conţine bibliograie. - ISBN 978-606-035-047-7 94 Cuprins INTRODUCERE...................................................................................................................................... 9 Context...................................................................................................................................................... 12 Deruta psihologică și cunoașterea limitată a realităților de politică internațională 12 Politica internă .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Literatura de specialitate și inovația cercetării .......................................................................... 14 Procesul de elaborare a cercetării ..................................................................................................... 15 CAPITOLUL I Concepte, teorii, scheme de analiză. Un model de analiză a politicii externe a Republicii Moldova ........................................................................................................................ 17 Structura metodologică
    [Show full text]
  • 'Krym Nash': an Analysis of Modern Russian Deception Warfare
    ‘Krym Nash’: An Analysis of Modern Russian Deception Warfare ‘De Krim is van ons’ Een analyse van hedendaagse Russische wijze van oorlogvoeren – inmenging door misleiding (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. H.R.B.M. Kummeling, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 16 december 2020 des middags te 12.45 uur door Albert Johan Hendrik Bouwmeester geboren op 25 mei 1962 te Enschede Promotoren: Prof. dr. B.G.J. de Graaff Prof. dr. P.A.L. Ducheine Dit proefschrift werd mede mogelijk gemaakt met financiële steun van het ministerie van Defensie. ii Table of contents Table of contents .................................................................................................. iii List of abbreviations ............................................................................................ vii Abbreviations and Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... vii Country codes .................................................................................................................................................... ix American State Codes ....................................................................................................................................... ix List of figures ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jus Soli Aversion (134) A
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ DEFINING THE NATION IN RUSSIA’S BUFFER ZONE: THE POLITICS OF BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP IN AZERBAIJAN, MOLDOVA AND GEORGIA A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in POLITICS by Maxim Tabachnik December 2017 The Dissertation of Maxim Tabachnik is approved: ________________________________ Professor Roger Schoenman, Chair _________________________________ Professor Ben Read _________________________________ Professor Eleonora Pasotti _________________________________ Professor Matt O’Hara _____________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Maxim Tabachnik 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page (i) Copyright Page (ii) Table of Contents (iii) List of Figures (viii) Abstract (x) Acknowledgements (xii) Introduction: Frozen Conflicts Under The Weight Of History (1) Part I. The Battle between Blood and Territory: Unanswered Questions (8) Chapter 1. Blood, Territory and the Nation: Ethnic/Civic Confusion (9) 1. Modernists and Their Critics (9) A. The Origins of the Nation: Modern or Pre-Modern? (10) B. The Un-Modernist History of Nationalism: Blood v. Territory (14) 2. Theoretical and Conceptual Hurdles (21) A. The Embattled Ethnic/Civic Dichotomy (21) B. An Ethnic/Territorial Solution (25) Chapter 2. Defining the Task at Hand (34) 1. Unanswered Questions (34) A. Citizenship in History: Between Blood and Territory (35) B. Ethnic/Territorial Dichotomy and Comparative Citizenship Studies (46) C. Ethnic/Territorial Identity in Russian, Soviet and Post-Soviet Space (53) a. Ethnic/Territorial Tension in Russian Imperial and Soviet Identity Policy (53) b. Ethnic/Territorial Citizenship Scholarship in Post-Soviet Space (PSS) (62) D. Unconditional Jus Soli: From the New World to the Human Rights Agenda (75) a.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    ETHNIC WAR AND PEACE IN POST-SOVIET EURASIA By SCOTT GRANT FEINSTEIN A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2016 © 2016 Scott Grant Feinstein To my Mom and Dad ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the course of completing this monograph I benefited enormously from the generosity of others. To my committee chair, Benjamin B. Smith, I express my sincere appreciation for his encouragement and guidance. Ben not only taught me to systematically research political phenomena, but also the importance of pursuing a complete and parsimonious explanation. Throughout my doctoral studies Ben remained dedicated to me and my research, and with his incredible patience he tolerated and motivated my winding intellectual path. I thank my committee co-chair, Michael Bernhard, for his hours spent reading early manuscript drafts, support in pursuing a multi-country project, and detailed attention to clear writing. Michael’s appreciation of my dissertation vision and capacity gave this research project its legs. Ben and Michael provided me exceptionally valuable advice. I am also indebted to the help provided by my other committee members – Conor O’Dwyer, Ingrid Kleespies and Beth Rosenson – who inspired creativity and scientific rigor, always provided thoughtful and useful comments, and kept me searching for the big picture. Among institutions, I wish to gratefully acknowledge the support of the Center of European Studies at the University of Florida, IIE Fulbright Foundation, the American Council of Learned Societies, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, IREX, the American Councils, and the Department of Political Science at the University of Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • White Book on Violations of Human Rights and the Rule of Law in Ukraine (April 2014 — Mid-June 2014)
    WHITE BOOK ON VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RULE OF LAW IN UKRAINE (APRIL 2014 — MID-JUNE 2014) OBL_Belaya kniga2_Eng.indd 1 08.07.2014 16:05:26 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation WHITE BOOK ON VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RULE OF LAW IN UKRAINE (APRIL 2014 — MID-JUNE 2014) Moscow June 2014 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 5 Violations of human rights and the principle of the rule of law in the course of the so-called ‘anti-terrorist operation’ ............................... 7 Violations of the right to freedom of thought and belief, including political beliefs; the intimidation and kidnapping of political opponents .................................................................................29 Restrictions on freedom of the media and journalist activities............................................................................... 41 Tragedy in Odessa ...................................................................................... 51 The Snipers’ Case: a mock investigation, violation of the right to the presumption of innocence and of the right to a fair trial ....................................................................... 61 Ethnic and linguistic discrimination, xenophobia and aggressive nationalism. Instigation of racism ..................................... 67 Manifestations of religious intolerance, including threats to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate .................
    [Show full text]
  • Vademecum Contemporary History Moldova a Guide to Archives, Research Institutions, Libraries, Associations, Museums and Sites of Memory
    Vademecum Contemporary History Moldova A guide to archives, research institutions, libraries, associations, museums and sites of memory Edited by Klaus Bochmann and Marina Dumbrava Commissioned by Bundesstiftung zur Aufarbeitung der SED-Diktatur/ Federal Foundation for the Study of the communist Dictatorship in Eastern Germany. Second amended and expanded edition, Berlin 2015. Source: geoatlas.com Source: Nistru Briceni ukRaine Prut Edineţ Soroca RâŞcani Bălţi Rîbniţa Orhei Călăraşi Dubăsari Chişinău Tiraspol Romania Hânceşti Tighina Cimişlia Comrat ukRaine Cahul Black Sea Republic of Moldova Donaudelta 0 15 30 45 km Donau Va demecum contempoRaRy HistoRy moldoVa A guide to A rchives, reseArch institutions, libr Aries, AssociAtions, museums A nd sites of memory 3 Vademecum contemporary History moldova A guide to archives, research institutions, libraries, associations, museums and sites of memory second amended and expanded edition, 2015. editors: Prof. dr. Klaus bochmann and dr. marina dumbrava lectorship: dr. sabine Kuder by request of the bundesstiftung zur Aufarbeitung der SED-diktatur/ federal foundation for the study of the communist dictatorship in eastern germany OrderS: bundesstiftung zur Aufarbeitung der SED-diktatur/ federal foundation for the study of the communist dictatorship in eastern germany Kronenstraße 5 d-10177 berlin tel.: 0049 30 3198950 fax: 0049 30 319895224 www.bundesstiftung-aufarbeitung.de [email protected] Price: 2,50 € berlin. 2015 © typesetting and layout: ultramarinrot – büro für Kommunikationsdesign 2015 © 4 federAl foundAtion for the study of the communist dictAtorshiP in Eastern germAny As defined by federal law, the Federal Foundation for the Study of the communist Dictatorship in Eastern Germany promotes a comprehensive reappraisal of the causes, history, and impact of the dictatorship in the Soviet zone of occupation in East Germany and the former GDR.
    [Show full text]
  • Republica Moldova, Între România Şi Rusia 1989-2009
    Biblioteca revistei „Limba Română” Dorin CIMPOEŞU REPUBLICA MOLDOVA, ÎNTRE ROMÂNIA ŞI RUSIA 1989-2009 Coordonatorul ediţiei: Alexandru BANTOŞ, redactor-şef al revistei „Limba Română”, director al Casei Limbii Române „Nichita Stănescu” Lectori: Veronica ROTARU Vasile GAVRILAN Machetare: Oxana BEJAN Coperta: Mihai BACINSCHI Descrierea CIP a Camerei Naţionale a Cărţii Cimpoeşu, Dorin Republica Moldova, între România şi Rusia. 1989-2009 Biblioteca revistei „Limba Română”. Chişinău, Tipografia Serebia, 2010, 428 p. ISBN CZU Volumul este editat pe cheltuiala proprie a autorului. Biblioteca revistei „Limba Română” Dorin CIMPOEŞU REPUBLICA MOLDOVA, ÎNTRE ROMÂNIA ŞI RUSIA 1989-2009 Cuvânt înainte de prof. univ. dr. Mihai RETEGAN Casa Limbii Române Nichita Stănescu Chişinău – 2010 Dedic această carte comemorării a 70 de ani de la deportările staliniste, cărora le-au căzut victime zeci de mii de români, după reocuparea Basarabiei de către armata roşie sovietică, la 28 iunie 1940 SUMAR Cuvânt înainte de Mihai Retegan .................................................................................. 11 Nota autorului ............................................................................................................... 13 INTRODUCERE Background istoric ........................................................................................................ 17 Perioada marilor transformări naţionale şi democratice ............................................... 27 Contrareacţia Moscovei la transformările naţionale şi democratice din Basarabia
    [Show full text]