Year 10 GCSE History Paper 3 – Weimar and Nazi Germany Information Booklet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Year 10 GCSE History Paper 3 – Weimar and Nazi Germany Information Booklet GCSE History Revision Information Booklet Paper 3: Weimar and Nazi Germany Year 10 GCSE History Paper 3 – Weimar and Nazi Germany Information booklet 1 GCSE History Revision Information Booklet Paper 3: Weimar and Nazi Germany KEY TOPIC 1.1 INFO: The Origins of the Weimar Republic, 1918-19 Germany had been dominant for large parts of WW1. Although many German soldiers had died during WW1 (3 million) most of the fighting had been in France. America had joined the war in 1917 and with their help, Germany was slowly losing land and retreating by October 1918. This was not reported to the German people so they were shocked when they finally surrendered. The situation was made even worse by the British navy surrounding Germany to prevent food getting in (a blockade) which led to serious food shortages and hardship for ordinary German people. The Kaiser had always controlled the government, army and navy but it October 1918 politicians took control of the government for the first time as the military situation got worse. Led by Prince Max of Baden they wanted to end the war however the leader of America, President Wilson, refused to discuss surrender until Kaiser Wilhelm (the man Wilson blamed for starting the war) was removed. To make matters worse, the Germany navy was asked to make one final attack on the British navy. With an end to the war being discussed and with no chance of victory the German sailors in a city called Kiel mutinied. This meant they stopped following their leader’s orders. Other mutinies broke out all across Germany as soldiers and the German people refused to fight until a surrender was agreed. This was known as the German Revolution, violence revolt spread across Germany. Finally on November 9th 1918 Kaiser Wilhelm realised he had no support to remain as King of Germany. With the pressure from Wilson to resign in order to have peace talks also, he gave up his role and left Germany. A temporary revolutionary government took Kaiser Wilhelm’s place, and signed the armistice (an agreement to stop fighting) on 11th November. Germany assumed, like everyone else, that they would be part of the peace talks. The German people had not heard any news of the German army’s defeats and were shocked when they quickly surrendered. By 1919, it was clear that a more permanent government was needed. On 19th January, in Weimar, a new ‘Weimar Republic’ came together for the first time. They had been voted for by the people of Germany, and were mostly made up of democratic parties (who had gained 80% of the vote). This is how Germany’s Weimar Republic was born. See the diagram below for an overview of its structure: The Weimar Republic was a very democratic system, giving it several strengths. However, some aspects of this democracy would make the Weimar Republic difficult to rule. See below for the strengths and weaknesses of the Weimar Republic: 2 GCSE History Revision Information Booklet Paper 3: Weimar and Nazi Germany Strengths Weaknesses All Germans had equal rights, including the … but, in 1919 many people did not want the democratic right to vote… Republic to be in charge of Germany. It was not sensible to allow everyone to vote when some wanted to destroy the Republic. Proportional representation made voting fair, This meant there was never one strong party but lots of it meant that every party got a proportion of different smaller parties. This meant Parliament would seats in parliament based on how many votes always be based on coalitions and agreements and lead to they received. having no one strong majority. Germany was used to have a strong leader in This gave the President huge amounts of power. If the charge like the new role of the President. A President did not support democracy he could make strong president was needed to take control himself a dictator. of Germany given all the different problems it faced. Germany was made up of states with their The states could turn against the central government. own traditions and ideas, it was right each state had a say in how its area was ruled Article 48 meant the President could quickly This meant that the President could ignore democracy and make laws to solve problems without having just make any law he wished. to ask anyone else to agree to it. KEY TOPIC 1.1 TASKS: The Origins of the Weimar Republic, 1918-19 1. Make a mind-map with ‘strengths and weaknesses of the Weimar Republic’ in the middle 2. Make flash cards for all of the key facts in topic 1.1 and test yourself KEY TOPIC 1.2 INFO: The early challenges to the Weimar Republic, 1919-23 The First World War had left Germany with many problems. As they took over just after the war, this would mean that the Weimar Republic could easily be blamed for the issues facing Germany. Here is a summary of the problems they faced, and the uprisings that resulted: Stab in the back myth Many people were outraged by the serious punishments of the Treaty of Versailles. They blamed their politicians for accepting the Treaty of Versailles (even if they had no choice). People began to call them November Criminals as they also blamed them for surrendering in the first place. These are some of the harsh punishments described in the ToV: T - Territory R - Reparations A - Army W – War Guilt L – League of Nations • All colonies given to Britain• and Had to pay £6.6 billion to • Army limited to • Article 231• Germany was France. France, Britain and 100,000 • Germany had to banned from • Gave 10% of its land to other America (note – this was • No tanks accept full joining the countries (Poland, France, etc) initially set as an • No planes responsibility for startingLeague of • Germany not allowed any soldiers in unlimitedits figure in the • No subs WW1 Nations land closest to France (Rhineland – ToV – 6.6 bill was • 6 warships (the first UN) demilitarised) worked out later) • Banned from joining with Austria 3 GCSE History Revision Information Booklet Paper 3: Weimar and Nazi Germany The government and the army The first Chancellor of the Weimar Republic was from a left wing party called the SPD. The army did not like left wing parties as they wanted to take power away from powerful business leaders and army generals and give it to soldiers and workers. The leaders of the army also thought democracy was weak and wanted the Kaiser to return so Germany had a strong leader. The Weimar Republic needed the support of the army to help put down all the rebellions so the leader of the Republic, a socialist called Ebert agreed not to change anything about the army and continue to give them large amounts of government spending in return for the army promising to protect the Weimar Republic. This meant the Weimar Republic now had the limited support of the army but now had no way to control it or change it. Spartacist Uprising This was an uprising led by two communists – Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxembourg. They wanted to make Germany into a communist country, just like a group called the Bolsheviks had done to Russia in 1917. They formed the Germany Communist Party (KPD) in 1918 and tried to overthrow the Weimar Republic on 6th January 1919 by taking over important government buildings. The leader of the Weimar Republic Ebert had to use the Germany army (Reichswehr) and a group of right wing ex-soldiers who had refused to hand over their guns and uniforms at the end of WW1. They were called the freikorps and were not part of the army or government, they joined together as they missed the friendships of the trenches and hated communists. The rebellion was quickly defeated and Rosa Luxembourg was executed by these soldiers without a trial. When there was another communist uprising in March 1919 1,000 communists were killed by the freikorps. Kapp Putsch Having a large armed group like the freikorps attacking communists and not taking orders from the government was a serious problem for the government. In 1920 the government announced they were going to disband (get rid) of the freikorps. The freikorps refused and joined up with a right wing politician called Wolfgang Kapp. They were joined by over 400 officers from the Reichswehr and their soldiers who sympathised with the freikorps and were angry at the government for reducing the size of the army. They seized control of a number of government buildings in Berlin forcing the government to move to another city. The army refused to stop the rebellion as they said they refused to fire against their own soldiers. It looked like the Weimar Republic had no one to stop the rebellion spreading. Finally the socialist leaders called on the German people to go on strike to stop the rebellion. Millions of workers refused to turn up to their jobs for days bringing Berlin and Germany to a standstill. Eventually Kapp and the freikorps had to end their attempted rebellion. However the army had shown it was only willing to support the Weimar government against left wing attacks and not against those from the right. French invasion of the Ruhr Germany had to pay back £6.6 billon in reparations through giving the winning countries money, goods and natural resources. With all the political problems Germany was facing its economy was also struggling. To help pay back these reparations the government began to print more and more money to give to France, Belgium and Britain.
Recommended publications
  • Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics After World War I
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO WORKING PAPER SERIES Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I Jose A. Lopez Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Kris James Mitchener Santa Clara University CAGE, CEPR, CES-ifo & NBER June 2018 Working Paper 2018-06 https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/working-papers/2018/06/ Suggested citation: Lopez, Jose A., Kris James Mitchener. 2018. “Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I,” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2018-06. https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2018-06 The views in this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I Jose A. Lopez Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Kris James Mitchener Santa Clara University CAGE, CEPR, CES-ifo & NBER* May 9, 2018 ABSTRACT. Fiscal deficits, elevated debt-to-GDP ratios, and high inflation rates suggest hyperinflation could have potentially emerged in many European countries after World War I. We demonstrate that economic policy uncertainty was instrumental in pushing a subset of European countries into hyperinflation shortly after the end of the war. Germany, Austria, Poland, and Hungary (GAPH) suffered from frequent uncertainty shocks – and correspondingly high levels of uncertainty – caused by protracted political negotiations over reparations payments, the apportionment of the Austro-Hungarian debt, and border disputes. In contrast, other European countries exhibited lower levels of measured uncertainty between 1919 and 1925, allowing them more capacity with which to implement credible commitments to their fiscal and monetary policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany Key Words
    Germany Key Words Anti–Semitism Hatred of the Jews. Article 48 Part of the Weimar Constitution, giving the President special powers to rule in a crisis. Used By Chancellors to rule when they had no majority in the Reichstag – and therefore an undemocratic precedent for Hitler. Aryan Someone who Belongs to the European type race. To the Nazis this meant especially non– Jewish and they looked for the ideal characteristics of fair hair, Blue eyes... Autobahn Motorway – showpieces of the Nazi joB creation schemes Bartering Buying goods with other goods rather than money. (As happened in the inflation crisis of 1923) Bavaria Large state in the South of Germany. Hitler & Nazis’ original Base. Capital – Munich Beerhall Putsch Failed attempt to seize power By Hitler in NovemBer 1923. Hitler jailed for five years – in fact released Dec 1924 Brown Shirts The name given to the S.A. Centre Party Party representing Roman Catholics – one of the Weimar coalition parties. Dissolves itself July 1933. Chancellor Like the Prime Minister – the man who is the chief figure in the government, Coalition A government made up of a number of parties working together, Because of the election system under Weimar, all its governments were coalitions. They are widely seen as weak governments. Conscription Compulsory military service – introduced by Hitler April1935 in his drive to build up Germany’s military strength (against the terms of the Versailles Treaty) Conservatives In those who want to ‘conserve’ or resist change. In Weimar Germany it means those whose support for the RepuBlic was either weak or non–existent as they wanted a return to Germany’s more ordered past.
    [Show full text]
  • Spencer Sunshine*
    Journal of Social Justice, Vol. 9, 2019 (© 2019) ISSN: 2164-7100 Looking Left at Antisemitism Spencer Sunshine* The question of antisemitism inside of the Left—referred to as “left antisemitism”—is a stubborn and persistent problem. And while the Right exaggerates both its depth and scope, the Left has repeatedly refused to face the issue. It is entangled in scandals about antisemitism at an increasing rate. On the Western Left, some antisemitism manifests in the form of conspiracy theories, but there is also a hegemonic refusal to acknowledge antisemitism’s existence and presence. This, in turn, is part of a larger refusal to deal with Jewish issues in general, or to engage with the Jewish community as a real entity. Debates around left antisemitism have risen in tandem with the spread of anti-Zionism inside of the Left, especially since the Second Intifada. Anti-Zionism is not, by itself, antisemitism. One can call for the Right of Return, as well as dissolving Israel as a Jewish state, without being antisemitic. But there is a Venn diagram between anti- Zionism and antisemitism, and the overlap is both significant and has many shades of grey to it. One of the main reasons the Left can’t acknowledge problems with antisemitism is that Jews persistently trouble categories, and the Left would have to rethink many things—including how it approaches anti- imperialism, nationalism of the oppressed, anti-Zionism, identity politics, populism, conspiracy theories, and critiques of finance capital—if it was to truly struggle with the question. The Left understands that white supremacy isn’t just the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis, but that it is part of the fabric of society, and there is no shortcut to unstitching it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Character of the Nazi Political Machine, 1928-1930, and the Isdap Electoral Breakthrough
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1976 The evelopmeD nt and Character of the Nazi Political Machine, 1928-1930, and the Nsdap Electoral Breakthrough. Thomas Wiles Arafe Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Arafe, Thomas Wiles Jr, "The eD velopment and Character of the Nazi Political Machine, 1928-1930, and the Nsdap Electoral Breakthrough." (1976). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2909. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/2909 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. « The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing pega(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Year 9 Grammar Stream Knowledge Organiser 2020
    Year 9 – Grammar Stream Knowledge Organisers Term 3 Swindon Academy 2020-21 Name: Tutor Group: Tutor & Room: “If you are not willing to learn, no one can help you. If you are determined to learn, no one can stop you.” Using your Knowledge Organiser and Quizzable Knowledge Organiser Knowledge Organisers Quizzable Knowledge Expectations for Prep and for Organisers using your Knowledge Organisers 1. Complete all prep work set in your subject prep book. 2. Bring your prep book to every lesson and ensure that you have completed all work by the deadline. 3. Take pride in your prep book – keep it neat and tidy. 4. Present work in your prep book to the same standard you are expected to do in class. Knowledge Organisers contain the These are designed to help you quiz essential knowledge that you MUST yourself on the essential Knowledge. know in order to be successful this year 5. Ensure that your use of SPAG is accurate. and in all subsequent years. 6. Write in blue or black pen and sketch in pencil. Use them to test yourself or get They will help you learn, revise and someone else to test you, until you 7. Ensure every piece of work has a title and date. retain what you have learnt in lessons are confident you can recall the in order to move the knowledge from information from memory. your short-term memory to long- 8. Use a ruler for straight lines. term memory. 9. If you are unsure about the prep, speak to your teacher. Top Tip Don’t write on your Quizzable Knowledge Organisers! 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Republic Page 1 of 5
    Czech Republic Page 1 of 5 Czech Republic International Religious Freedom Report 2008 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The Constitution provides for freedom of religion, and other laws and policies contributed to the generally free practice of religion. The Government generally respected religious freedom in practice. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the Government during the period covered by this report. There were some reports of societal discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. Occasional acts and expressions of anti-Semitism were reported among some elements of the population. The U.S. Government discusses religious freedom with the Government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. Section I. Religious Demography The country has an area of 30,442 square miles and a population of 10.2 million. The population is largely homogeneous with a dominant Christian tradition. However, in part as a result of 40 years of communist rule between 1948 and 1989, the vast majority of citizens do not identify themselves as members of any organized religion. In a 2007 opinion poll sponsored by the Stredisko Empirickych Vyzkumu (STEM) agency, 28 percent of respondents claimed to believe in God, while 48 percent identified themselves as atheists. Only 18 percent of citizens under 29 professed a belief in God. Similarly, in a May 2007 poll by the Public Opinion Research Centre (Centrum pro vyzkum verejneho mineni, or CVVM), 55 percent of citizens voiced a mistrust of churches, while only 28 percent stated that they trust them.
    [Show full text]
  • Hans Rößler Nationalsozialismus in Der Fränkischen Provinz Neuendettelsau Unterm Hakenkreuz
    Hans Rößler Nationalsozialismus in der fränkischen Provinz Neuendettelsau unterm Hakenkreuz Hans Rößler Nationalsozialismus in der fränkischen Provinz Neuendettelsau unterm Hakenkreuz Bibliografische Informationen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbib- liografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet unter http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. 1. Auflage 2017 © Diakonie Neuendettelsau ISBN 978-3-9809431-9-2 Gestaltung: Andrea Töcker/Neuendettelsau Druck: VDS VERLAGSDRUCKEREI SCHMIDT 91413 Neustadt an der Aisch Umschlagsgestaltung: Reinhard Zimmermann/Mörsach Bildvorlage: Postkarte „Heilgrüße aus Neuendettelsau“ (Verlag SA. Trupp 4/19 Neuendettels- au/Mfr.), 1933 Inhalt Geleitwort von Rektor Dr. Mathias Hartmann .......................................................... 9 Vorwort: NS-Forschung in der fränkischen Provinz ................................................... 11 Einleitung: Der Ort Neuendettelsau in den 1930-er Jahren ....................................... 17 1. Teil: Christian Keyßers Hitler-Lied und seine Unterzeichner (1933) ............................... 21 1.1 Das Hitler-Lied von Christian Keyßer ......................................................................... 21 1.2 Dr. h. c. Christian Keyßer (1877–1961) – von der Missionspraxis der Stammesbekehrung zur völkischen Ideologie ............................................................ 24 1.3 Dr. Friedrich Eppelein (1887–1969) – durch die Volksmission zum Nationalsozialismus
    [Show full text]
  • Nurses and Midwives in Nazi Germany
    Downloaded by [New York University] at 03:18 04 October 2016 Nurses and Midwives in Nazi Germany This book is about the ethics of nursing and midwifery, and how these were abrogated during the Nazi era. Nurses and midwives actively killed their patients, many of whom were disabled children and infants and patients with mental (and other) illnesses or intellectual disabilities. The book gives the facts as well as theoretical perspectives as a lens through which these crimes can be viewed. It also provides a way to teach this history to nursing and midwifery students, and, for the first time, explains the role of one of the world’s most historically prominent midwifery leaders in the Nazi crimes. Downloaded by [New York University] at 03:18 04 October 2016 Susan Benedict is Professor of Nursing, Director of Global Health, and Co- Director of the Campus-Wide Ethics Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing in Houston. Linda Shields is Professor of Nursing—Tropical Health at James Cook Uni- versity, Townsville, Queensland, and Honorary Professor, School of Medi- cine, The University of Queensland. Routledge Studies in Modern European History 1 Facing Fascism 9 The Russian Revolution of 1905 The Conservative Party and the Centenary Perspectives European dictators 1935–1940 Edited by Anthony Heywood and Nick Crowson Jonathan D. Smele 2 French Foreign and Defence 10 Weimar Cities Policy, 1918–1940 The Challenge of Urban The Decline and Fall of a Great Modernity in Germany Power John Bingham Edited by Robert Boyce 11 The Nazi Party and the German 3 Britain and the Problem of Foreign Office International Disarmament Hans-Adolf Jacobsen and Arthur 1919–1934 L.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1 December 2009 DRAFT Jonathan Petropoulos Bridges from the Reich: the Importance of Émigré Art Dealers As Reflecte
    Working Paper--Draft 1 December 2009 DRAFT Jonathan Petropoulos Bridges from the Reich: The Importance of Émigré Art Dealers as Reflected in the Case Studies Of Curt Valentin and Otto Kallir-Nirenstein Please permit me to begin with some reflections on my own work on art plunderers in the Third Reich. Back in 1995, I wrote an article about Kajetan Mühlmann titled, “The Importance of the Second Rank.” 1 In this article, I argued that while earlier scholars had completed the pioneering work on the major Nazi leaders, it was now the particular task of our generation to examine the careers of the figures who implemented the regime’s criminal policies. I detailed how in the realm of art plundering, many of the Handlanger had evaded meaningful justice, and how Datenschutz and archival laws in Europe and the United States had prevented historians from reaching a true understanding of these second-rank figures: their roles in the looting bureaucracy, their precise operational strategies, and perhaps most interestingly, their complex motivations. While we have made significant progress with this project in the past decade (and the Austrians, in particular deserve great credit for the research and restitution work accomplished since the 1998 Austrian Restitution Law), there is still much that we do not know. Many American museums still keep their curatorial files closed—despite protestations from researchers (myself included)—and there are records in European archives that are still not accessible.2 In light of the recent international conference on Holocaust-era cultural property in Prague and the resulting Terezin Declaration, as well as the Obama Administration’s appointment of Stuart Eizenstat as the point person regarding these issues, I am cautiously optimistic.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 3 Weimar and Nazi Germany Revision Guide and Student Activity Book
    Paper 3 Weimar and Nazi Germany Revision Guide and Student Activity Book Section 1 – Weimar Republic 1919-1929 What was Germany like before and after the First World War? Before the war After the war The Germans were a proud people. The proud German army was defeated. Their Kaiser, a virtual dictator, was celebrated for his achievements. The Kaiser had abdicated (stood down). The army was probably the finest in the world German people were surviving on turnips and bread (mixed with sawdust). They had a strong economy with prospering businesses and a well-educated, well-fed A flu epidemic was sweeping the country, killing workforce. thousands of people already weakened by rations. Germany was a superpower, being ruled by a Germany declared a republic, a new government dictatorship. based around the idea of democracy. The first leader of this republic was Ebert. His job was to lead a temporary government to create a new CONSTITUTION (SET OF RULES ON HOW TO RUN A COUNTRY) Exam Practice - Give two things you can infer from Source A about how well Germany was being governed in November 1918. (4 marks) From the papers of Jan Smuts, a South African politician who visited Germany in 1918 “… mother-land of our civilisation (Germany) lies in ruins, exhausted by the most terrible struggle in history, with its peoples broke, starving, despairing, from sheer nervous exhaustion, mechanically struggling forward along the paths of anarchy (disorder with no strong authority) and war.” Inference 1: Details in the source that back this up: Inference 2: Details in the source that back this up: On the 11th November, Ebert and the new republic signed the armistice.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Violence: the German Army and Politics, 1918-1923
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2015-09-11 Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 Bucholtz, Matthew N Bucholtz, M. N. (2015). Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27638 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2451 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 By Matthew N. Bucholtz A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2015 © Matthew Bucholtz 2015 Abstract November 1918 did not bring peace to Germany. Although the First World War was over, Germany began a new and violent chapter as an outbreak of civil war threatened to tear the country apart. The birth of the Weimar Republic, Germany’s first democratic government, did not begin smoothly as republican institutions failed to re-establish centralized political and military authority in the wake of the collapse of the imperial regime. Coupled with painful aftershocks from defeat in the Great War, the immediate postwar era had only one consistent force shaping and guiding political and cultural life: violence.
    [Show full text]