A new from the late of San Juan Province, , and its phylogenetic implications

ESPERANZA CERDEÑO, MARÍA E. PÉREZ, CECILIA M. DESCHAMPS, and VÍCTOR H. CONTRERAS

Cerdeño, E., Pérez, M.E., Deschamps, C.M., and Contreras, V.H. 2019. A new capybara from the late Miocene of San Juan Province, Argentina, and its phylogenetic implications. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 64 (1): 199–212.

A new hydrochoerine , Cardiatherium calingastaense sp. nov. (), is described based on the specimen INGEO-PV 87. It was recovered from the late Miocene Las Flores Formation, cropping out at the Puchuzum locality, San Juan Province, Argentina. The new species is based on a particular combination of characters, among which the following can be highlighted: p4 with internal fissures equally deep as in Cardiatherium paranense, secondary external fissure as in Cardiatherium patagonicum, and lacking the fifth internal fissure and supernumerary internal fissure, as in C. paranense; m3 with a conspicuous labial column in the posterior ramus of the second prism; very deep primary and secondary external fissures in upper cheek teeth, the former producing a labial strong step-shaped profile in M2; sagittal crest on the parietals; bullae small in ventral view; scars of the origin of the masseter medialis muscle with an anterior projection up to the level of the incisive foramen and the maxilla-premaxilla suture. The phylogenetic analysis supports the taxonomic proposal of creating a new species of Cardiatherium and shows C. calingastaense sp. nov. as the sister group of the other species of the genus. The lineage leading to the clade Cardiatherium + largest would have originated at least during the SALMA (early late Miocene). Cardiatherium calingastaense sp. nov. adds to the previous record of Cardiatherium chasicoense and Cardiatherium paranense in the late Miocene of San Juan and Mendoza provinces, respectively, thus increasing the diversity of capybaras in central-west Argentina.

Key words: Mammalia, Rodentia, Caviidae, Cardiatherium, systematics, phylogeny, Miocene, Argentina.

Esperanza Cerdeño [[email protected]], Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambi- entales (IANIGLA), Centro Científico Tecnológico, CONICET Mendoza, Av. Ruiz Leal s/n, 5500, Mendoza, Argentina. María E. Pérez [[email protected]], Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio, Av. Fontana 140, U9100GYO, , Argentina. Cecilia M. Deschamps [[email protected]], Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina; División Paleontología Vertebrados, Unidades de Investigación Anexo Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 122 y 60, 1900, La Plata, Argentina. Víctor H. Contreras [[email protected]], Instituto de Geología Dr. Emiliano P. Aparicio (INGEO) y Depar- tamento Geología, FCEFN, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, Ignacio de la Roza y Meglioli, 5400 Rivadavia, San Juan, Argentina.

Received 5 September 2018, accepted 19 October 2018, available online 26 November 2018.

Copyright © 2018 E. Cerdeño et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (for details please see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

and the South American Land Ages Introduction (SALMAs; Contreras et al. 1995; Peralta et al. 1995; Contreras The Neogene continental outcrops in the San Juan Province, 1996; Cerdeño and Contreras 2000; Ciancio et al. 2006; León central-west Argentina (Fig. 1), encompass two localities and Bracco 2008; Bracco et al. 2011; Contreras and Baraldo that have yielded important late Miocene vertebrate remains. 2011; Suvires and Contreras 2011). These localities are Puchuzum (Calingasta Valley), whose Concerning the fossils from Puchuzum, different lev- faunal assemblage is assigned to the Huayquerian SALMA els of the section (distinct architectural elements) have (late –Messinian; see Deschamps et al. 2013, for provided remains of molluscs, ostracods, insects, fishes, further details in bio- and chronostratigraphic equivalences), and palynomorphs (found within lacustrine sediments), and Loma de Las Tapias, where two different levels are on the one hand, and and (derived from recognized as corresponding to the Chasicoan (Tortonian) flood plain sediments), together with footprint tracks, on

Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 64 (1): 199–212, 2019 https://doi.org/10.4202/app.00544.2018 200 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 64 (1), 2019

A B W6933’ N

25 Casta viejo o River

35 ARGENTINA

Candelaria Creek S3106’36’’

Puchuzum 45

500 km

55 1km 80 70 60 Fig. 1. Geographical map showing position of studied area within San Juan Province, central-west Argentina (A) and location of outcrops of the Las Flores Formation (striped area) near the village of Puchuzum (B). The asterisks indicate the fossil locality. the other hand (Contreras 1996; Contreras and Peralta 1998; 1883a, b; Rovereto 1914; Kraglievich 1930; Rusconi 1933, Prámparo et al. 1998; Contreras and Cerdeño 2010; Bracco 1935, 1944; Pascual and Bondesio 1963; Francis and Mones et al. 2011). Among mammal remains, only the specimens 1965a, b; Bondesio 1985a, b; Mones 1991; among others), of a Hegetotheriidae () were studied in de- but revisions such as those by Mones (1984) and, more tail (Cerdeño and Contreras 2000). However, the faunal recently, Vucetich et al. (2005, 2012, 2014a, b, 2015) and assemblage also includes xenarthrans, litopterns and ro- Deschamps et al. (2007, 2009) have evidenced a great taxo- dents (Contreras and Cerdeño 2010; Bracco et al. 2011). nomic overestimation due to ontogenetic variation that had The hegetotheriid Hemihegetotherium achataleptum indi- not been previously evaluated; consequently, these authors cated a Huayquerian SALMA for this fauna (Cerdeño and drastically reduced the known diversity of hydrochoerines, Contreras 2000), but no absolute age has been obtained for especially for the late Miocene– interval. the unit. Herein we present the study of a well-preserved Within the late Miocene, the oldest species is Cardia- skull and mandible of a capybara, associated with some therium chasicoense Pascual and Bondesio, 1968 from the fragments of postcranial bones. Chasicoan SALMA, which is known from the type locality Capybaras are the largest living , represented by Arroyo Chasicó (Buenos Aires Province) as well as from the single genus , reaching a body length of the lower levels of the Loma de Las Tapias Formation in 100–130 cm, and adult males weighting up to 91 kg (Mones San Juan Province (Contreras 2000; Contreras et al. 2001; and Ojasti 1986). They have semiaquatic habits, and live Deschamps et al. 2007, 2009; Contreras and Baraldo 2011). in groups usually ranging in size from two to 30 individ- In turn, the Huayquerian SALMA localities with hydro- uals (Dunnum 2015). They have characteristic euhypsod- choerines are more abundant and the material was re-eval- ont, multilaminated cheek teeth (Novak 1991; Deschamps et uated by Vucetich et al. (2005). These authors described al. 2007). The phylogenetic relationships of capybaras with Cardiatherium patagonicum as the southernmost record, other cavioid rodents and the status of hydrochoerids have from the Puerto Madryn Formation (Chubut Province). been revised during the last years (Rowe and Honeycutt At the same time, they proposed that all material from 2002; Vucetich and Pérez 2011; Upham and Patterson 2015; the Ituzaingó Formation (Entre Ríos Province, north- Pérez et al. 2018, and references therein). After these au- east Argentina) would correspond to only one species, C. thors, capybaras would be within the Family Caviidae as a paranense, which was later confirmed by Vucetich et al. subfamily, Hydrochoerinae, together with the extinct car- (2014b). These authors also recognized C. paranense in diomyines and the small Kerodon (rock-dwelling mocos), Tupungato, Mendoza Province (central-west Argentina), the other living genus of the subfamily (Rowe and Honeycutt from levels of the Río de Los Pozos Formation, referred to 2002; Pérez and Pol 2012; Pérez et al. 2018). the late Miocene (Yrigoyen 1993). Another species assigned The fossil record of capybaras (that is, hydrochoerines to this genus, Cardiatherium orientalis Francis and Mones, excluding ‘cardiomyines’) goes back to the late Miocene, and 1965b, was recorded in the late Miocene of , and many taxa were described since the 19th century (Ameghino tentatively recognized later in the Cerro Azul Formation, La CERDEÑO ET AL.—A NEW MIOCENE CAPYBARA FROM ARGENTINA 201

Pampa Province, Argentina, as C. aff. orientalis (Vucetich Nomenclatural acts.—This published work and the nomen- et al. 2014b). The genus Cardiatherium is also known in the clatural acts it contains, have been registered in ZooBank: late Miocene of , and (Deschamps et urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2A1D2DDE-7100-4BC7-B0B1- al. 2013 and literature therein). 8862CC1A064E. The present contribution focuses on the description of a new species of Cardiatherium based on well-preserved cranial remains, previously mentioned as Cardiatherium sp. Material and methods (Contreras and Cerdeño 2010), found in the province of San Juan. On the basis of a cladistic analysis, the phylogenetic The studied material, INGEO-PV 87, includes a single spec- position of the new species and the monophyly of the genus imen composed of a well-preserved skull with associated Cardiatherium within Caviidae were tested. mandible, and some fragmentary postcranial remains of the same individual, housed at the Vertebrate Palaeontological Institutional abbreviations.—GHUNLPam, Cátedra de Collection of the INGEO. It was compared with the ho- Geología Histórica, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, lotypes and referred materials of Cardiatherium chasico- Santa Rosa, Argentina; INGEO-PV, Vertebrate Palaeonto- ense, C. paranense, C. orientalis, and C. rosendoi, housed logical collection, Instituto de Geología Dr. Emiliano P. in the following Argentinean museums: IMUSJ, MACN, Aparicio, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan, MLP, MMH, MMP, and MPEF. The specimens of C. pata- Argentina; MACN, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, gonicum used for comparisons and the phylogenetic analy- “B. Rivadavia”, Buenos Aires, Argentina; MLP, Museo sis were taken from Vucetich et al. (2005) and Dozo et al. de La Plata, Argentina; MMH-CH, Museo Municipal de (2010). Cardiatherium aff. orientalis from the Cerro Azul Cien cias Naturales de Monte Hermoso, Argentina; MMP, Formation in La Pampa Province was also used in this study. Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales “Lorenzo Scaglia”, The detailed list of revised remains is in Appendix 1. Mar del Plata, Argentina; MNHN-AYO, Ayo-Ayo collec- Dental nomenclature is given in Fig. 2A–E (flexus/flexid tion, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France; were originally named as fissures by Mones 1991, and are MPEF-PV, Palaeontological collection, Museo Pale on to- here indistinctly used) and follows partially Vucetich et al. lógico “Egidio Feruglio”, Trelew, Argentina; PVSJ, Verte- (2005) and modifications according to Pérez et al. (2018). brate Palaeontological collection, Instituto y Museo de Cien- However, some modifications have been introduced in this cias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan, paper, in order to fit with a new character observed in the Argentina; SPV-FHC, Sección Paleontología Vertebrados, p4 of Cardiatherium patagonicum and the new species here Departamento de Paleontología, Facultad de Humanidades described. This new feature is the external flexid of the pos- y Ciencias, Montevideo, Uruguay. terior lobe of prII of p4 (Fig. 2A), here referred to as hse or h2e according to the nomenclature of m1–m3 (h.s.e. sensu Other abbreviations.—ch., character; he, external fissure; Mones 1991; Fig. 2B–D). Hence, the external fissure of the HFI, fundamental internal fissure; hfe, fundamental external anterior supernumerary prism of p4 (prsa) is named here fissure; hi, internal fissure; HPE, primary external fissure; h3e (h.s.e. or h.2e sensu Mones 1991; Fig. 2A, D). Lobes of hpi, primary internal fissure; HSE/hse, secondary external caviids are referred to as prisms in hydrochoerines. Cranial fissure; hsi, secondary internal fissure; hsni, internal super- nomenclature follows Vucetich et al. (2014b) and Pérez et numerary fissure; hti, tertiary internal fissure; M/m, upper/ al. (2018). lower molar; P/p, upper/lower premolar; pr, prism; prIIa/b, Skull measurements follow Vucetich et al. (2014b): (i) anterior and posterior lobes of prII; prsa, anterior secondary posterior width of the incisive foramen; (ii) rostral width at prism; SALMA, South American Land Mammal Age. the anterior margin of the anterior root of the zygomatic arch ABC DE

5mm

Fig. 2. Dental nomenclature (occlusal view). A–C, E. Cardiatherium calingastaense sp. nov. A. Right p4. B. Right m1. C. Right m3. E. Right M1. D. Cardiatherium patagonicum, right p4. Abbreviations: c, column; he, external fissure (or flexid); HFI, fundamental internal fissure (hypoflexus); hfe, fundamental external fissure; hi, internal fissure; HPE, primary external fissure; hpi, primary internal fissure; HSE/hse, secondary external fissure; hsi, secondary internal fissure; hsni, internal supernumerary fissure; hti, tertiary internal fissure; pr, prism; prIIa/b, anterior and posterior lobes of pr II; prsa, anterior secondary prism. 202 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 64 (1), 2019

(complete or up to the midline in incomplete specimens); (iii) distinguished by their yellowish coloration. These bentonitic width between the anteriormost points of the scars marking packages clearly correspond to sedimentary events that orig- the origin of the masseter medialis muscle; (iv) rostral width inated in lakes, evidenced by the recorded fossils: bivalves, at the level of P4, measured at the alveolar margin of prism gastropods, insects, and fish (Peralta et al. 1995; Contreras I; (v) rostral width at the posterior margin of the anterior 1996; Contreras and Peralta 1998; Bracco et al. 2011; Bogan root of the zygomatic arch (complete or up to the midline et al. 2018). In turn, the mammals from this mid-section at in incomplete specimens); (vi) rostral width at the level of Puchuzum represent a Huayquerian faunal association within M2, measured at the alveolar margin of prII; (vii) distance the late Miocene (Peralta et al. 1995; Contreras 1996; Cerdeño between the posterior margin of the incisive foramen and and Contreras 2000). P4; (viii) P4–M1 anteroposterior length; and (ix) angle of The general palaeoenvironment of the mid-section of the beginning of the ventral anterior zygomatic arch and the Puchuzum is interpreted as a fluvial system with great devel- alveolar series, in lateral view. In order to explore the phy- opment of flood plains and rivers, more or less channelled and logenetic relationships of the taxon studied, we scored the strongly sinuous. The lacustrine interbeddings correspond to new anatomical information throughout the last version of increasing and decreasing events of the lacustrine basin, in- the combined Cavioidea matrix (Madozzo Jaén et al. 2018), fluenced by tectonic and hydrologic activity. A similar situa- originally published by Pérez and Pol (2012). The combined tion has been interpreted for the Las Flores Formation in the dataset of morphological and molecular characters (SOM 1 Iglesia Basin (Milana 1994; Jordan et al. 1997). and 2; Supplementary Online Material available at http://app. pan.pl/SOM/app64-Cerdeno_etal_SOM.pdf) was modified. Some multistate characters are ordered, nine characters have been modified and eight characters are new (see SOM 2). Systematic palaeontology The new dataset was analysed under equally weighted par- Rodentia Bowdich, 1821 simony in TNT (Goloboff and Catalano 2015), using a heu- ristic search of 1000 replicates of Wagner trees, followed Hystricognathi Tullberg, 1899 by tree bisection and reconnection branch swapping. Node Cavioidea (Fischer, 1817) sensu Kraglievich 1930 supports were calculated using absolute GC bootstrap fre- Caviidae (Fischer, 1817) sensu Waterhouse 1839 quencies calculated after 1000 pseudoreplicates. The modi- fied Stratigraphic Manhattan Measure (Pol and Norell 2001) Hydrochoerinae (Gray, 1825) Gill, 1872 was used to calibrate the most parsimonious phylogenetic Genus Cardiatherium Ameghino, 1883b trees and the chronostratigraphic information for fossil taxa Type species: Cardiatherium doeringi Ameghino, 1883b (= Cardiathe- using TNT. rium paranense [Ameghino, 1883a] in Vucetich et al. 2014b); Paraná River cliffs, Entre Ríos, Argentina, Ituzaingó Formation, Late Miocene. Species included: Cardiatherium patagonicum Vucetich, Deschamps, Olivares, and Dozo, 2005, Cardiatherium orientalis (Francis and Mo- Geological setting nes, 1965b), Cardiatherium chasicoense (Pascual and Bondesio, 1968), The specimen herein studied was collected in 2006 in levels Cardiatherium rosendoi Bondesio, 1985b, Cardiatherium talicei Fran- cis and Mones, 1965a, and Cardiatherium isseli Rovereto, 1914. of the Las Flores Formation, in the area of Puchuzum in the Calingasta Valley (Fig. 1). This unit is widely developed Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Late Miocene (Chasi- both geographically and in thickness in the Iglesia valley, coan and Huayquerian SALMAs) of Argentina, Brazil, Peru, where its type locality has been recognized (Wetten 1975; Uruguay, and Venezuela. Contreras et al. 2013 and references therein). The strati- Cardiatherium calingastaense sp. nov. graphic section at Puchuzum was previously described by Peralta et al. (1995) (see also Bracco et al. 2011), and corre- Figs. 3, 4. sponds to the Neogene sediments cropping out at both mar- 2010 Cardiatherium sp.; Contreras and Cerdeño 2010: 8R. gins of the Candelaria Creek, in the piedmont of the Manrique ZooBank LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:343DF38E-F84D-43C7-9687- Mountains, Cordillera Frontal. According to geological and 05C91FF26257 palaeontological studies at Puchuzum (Peralta et al. 1995; Etymology: After the Calingasta Valley, where the locality of Puchu- Contreras et al. 1995; Contreras 1996; Contreras and Peralta zum is located. 1998; Cerdeño and Contreras 2000; Bracco et al. 2011; Bogan Holotype: INGEO-PV 87, skull and mandible of an adult individual, et al. 2018), the bony remains recorded in this locality, which together with associated fragments of vertebrae and long bones. come from the middle of the exposed section, were assigned Type locality: Right side of the Candelaria Creek, Puchuzum area, Cal- to the latest Miocene. This mid-section is characterized by ingasta Valley, San Juan Province, central-west Argentina. brown-reddish to greyish psammo-pelitic deposits, reddish Type horizon: Mid stratigraphic section of Las Flores Formation, late silty to silty-sandy beds, with some carbonaceous and con- Miocene. glomeratic levels, and with cut and fill structures. Three man- Diagnosis.—Cavioid diagnosed by the following unique tiform interbeddings of bentonitic clay, 3 to 10 m thick, are combination of characters (autapomorphies marked with an CERDEÑO ET AL.—A NEW MIOCENE CAPYBARA FROM ARGENTINA 203

suture sagittal crest frontals temporal A1 suture fossae nasals

dorsal projection of premaxilla

squamosal anterior root of the zygomatic arch

30 mm mesopterygoid jugal fossa palatal foramen incisive foramen

A 2

A 3

tympanic bulla

3mm B12B

mental foramen

bottom of incisor alveolus 30 mm

Fig. 3. Holotype (INGEO-PV 87) of the hydrochoerine rodent Cardiatherium calingastaense sp. nov., late Miocene, Puchuzum, San Juan Province, Argentina. A. Skull in dorsal (A1) and ventral (A2) views, and detail of the scars for masseter medialis muscle (A3); correspondence indicated by lines. B. Mandible in occlusal (B1) and left lateral (B2) views. 204 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 64 (1), 2019 asterisk): euhypsodont cheek teeth; p4 with three prisms This condition contrasts with that of the largest capybaras, and P4 with two-lobed prisms as in other Hydrochoerinae; which present an interposed area between the temporal fos- p4 with hfe, h3e, hpi, h2i, and h3i as in Hydrochoeropsis, sae (which are shallower than in C. calingastaense sp. nov.) Phugatherium, Neochoerus, and Hydrochoerus; h2i and instead of the sagittal crest. The postorbital apophyses are h3i equally deep as in Cardiatherium paranense, Hydro- incomplete and would have been short. choeropsis dasseni, but differing from Hydrochoerus and In right lateral view, the ventral portion of the zygo- Neochoerus in which h2i is shallower than h3i and its apex matic arch is preserved and is similar to the condition of is behind the hfe; p4 with hse (h2e) as in C. patagonicum; Hydrochoerus. The maxillary anterior root of the arch is p4 lacks h5i and hsni, as in C. paranense; hpi, hti, HFI, and dorso-ventrally flattened and narrows posteriorly, be- hfe of m1/M1–m2/M2 not splitting the teeth, as in other ing dorso-ventrally elongated like the jugal, which is an- Cardiatherium and differing from Hydrochoeropsis, Phuga- tero-posteriorly short. The squamosal forms the posterior therium, Neochoerus, and Hydrochoerus, in which those portion of the arch and is posteriorly extended above the flexi/ids completely cross the tooth; *m3 with a conspicuous tympanic bulla. The external auditory meatus is above the labial column in the posterior ramus of prIIa in contrast to level of the molar series. The angle formed by the anterior other species; HPE and HSE very deep, the latter shorter root of the zygomatic arch and the alveolar plane in Lateral than the former but deeper than in other species and oriented view is <20°, similar to C. paranense, but different from C. backwards; M3 with nine prisms; sagittal crest on the pari- aff. orientalis from the Cerro Azul Formation, in which it is etals, unlike Hydrochoeropsis, Phugatherium, Neochoerus, 24–26° (Vucetich et al. 2014b). and Hydrochoerus, in which the area between both temporal In ventral view (Fig. 3A2), the diastema is longer than the fossae is plane, without forming the sagittal crest; bullae molariform series (Table 1), like in C. paranense, C. pata- small in ventral view as in Neochoerus and Hydrochoerus; gonicum, H. dasseni, and P. novum. The scars for the inser- *scars marking the origin of the masseter medialis muscle on tion of the masseter superficialis muscle are anteriorly con- the beginning of the anterior zygomatic arch (ventral face), vergent as in the other species of Cardiatherium; however, with an anterior projection up to the level of the incisive fora- in INGEO-PV 87 there is an additional scar in this area. One men and the maxilla-premaxilla suture. is oval, transversely concave, placed between the root of the Description.—As it is reflected in the diagnosis of the zygomatic arch and the P4, but extended anteriorly beyond new proposed taxon, the specimen INGEO-PV 87 (Figs. 3, this tooth, as observed in the other species of the genus; 4) may be referred to the genus Cardiatherium, discard- and the other one is another smooth surface at an obtuse ing its assignment to other genera of capybaras such as angle with the first scar, which is directed to the sagittal Phugatherium, Hydrochoeropsis or the modern lineages plane, reaching the border of the incisive foramen, where represented by Hydrochoerus and Neochoerus (see also the premaxilla-maxilla suture is located (Fig. 3A2, A3). The Phylogenetic analysis and Discussion). Therefore, the fol- incisive foramen is ovoid and broad as in C. paranense lowing description is focused on the comparison of the stud- whereas it is narrow in C. aff. orientalis (Table 1). The base ied material with the known species of Cardiatherium. of P4 does not project laterally and therefore does not form Skull: It is somewhat mediolaterally deformed and lacks the bulge observable in ventral view in C. paranense. The the left zygomatic arch, the left parietal-occipital area, and ratio between the distance from the base of the incisive the left M3 (Fig. 3A1, A2). foramen up to the middle point between both P4s and the In dorsal view (Fig. 3A1), the nasal is anterolaterally upper tooth series length is close to the minimum values broken but the preserved portion indicates that this bone of Cardiatherium, but different from the large capybaras is long. The nasal is a little longer than the frontal in the (Phugatherium) and the modern lineages (Hydrochoerus– new species as in C. paranense and the biggest capybaras Neochoerus), in which the tooth series is proportionally (Phugatherium, Hydrochoeropsis, Hydrochoerus). Laterally, longer (Table 1). The palate is rather shallow; from the level the nasal is in contact with the dorsal projection of the pre- of M1 to that of the third prism of M3, there is a medium, maxilla and posteriorly with the frontal. The nasal is dorsally narrow crest with a long and narrow palatal foramen at each slightly convex, differing from the strongly bulging condi- side (M2–M3 level). The mesopterygoid fossa is narrow in tion of C. paranense and from Hydrochoerus, in which the outline, with a rounded anterior margin at the level of the nasal is slightly bulky in the middle portion. The posterior posterior portion of the M3, as in C. paranense and C. pata- border of the nasal is anteriorly slightly concave, differing gonicum. The tooth rows are divergent, but with a smooth from the strongly concave border of C. paranense. The nasal curvature with M3 aligned with P4–M2, as in C. paranense. and frontal (Fig. 3A1) are proportionately narrower than in C. In C. patagonicum and C. aff. orientalis, the M3 are nearly paranense, Phugatherium, and Hydrochoerus. The frontal parallel. The basicranium is badly preserved, although part and the anterior portion of the parietal are dorsally flat as in of the basisphenoid and the right tympanic bulla are pre- most Hydrochoerinae. The posterior portion of the parietal served. The bulla is relatively small. The occipital face is has a temporal fossa posterolaterally concave and the tempo- incomplete and displaced; the right paraoccipital apophysis ral lines join, although not completely fusing, in a short sag- is distally incomplete, but it would have been relatively long ittal crest that diverges again posteriorly at the nuchal crest. (Fig. 3A1). CERDEÑO ET AL.—A NEW MIOCENE CAPYBARA FROM ARGENTINA 205

A1 A 2 A 3 A 4

5mm

A 6 A 7 A 8 A 9 A 5 10 mm

Fig. 4. Occlusal dental details of the holotype (INGEO-PV 87) of the hydrochoerine rodent Cardiatherium calingastaense sp. nov., late Miocene, Puchuzum, San Juan Province, Argentina. Right P4–M3 (A1), left P4–M1 (A2), left M1–M2 (A3), posterior part of right M3 (A4), left p4–m3 (A5), right m1 (A6), left m3 (A7), left p4 (A8), right p4 (A9). Mandible: The mandible preserves the symphysis, with reaches internally the anterior half of the m2 and widens the incisors, most of the left horizontal ramus, with p4–m3, the lingual side of the ramus (clearly visible on the left side). and the anterior part of the right ramus (Fig. 3B). The right The posterior border of the symphysis in C. calingastaense cheek teeth were recovered separately, but complete. The sp. nov. is below p4; according to Vucetich et al. (2005) and symphysis is narrow and procumbent, with a smooth me- Deschamps et al. (2007), its position depends on the age of dian keel on the labial side; the posterior end of the symphy- individuals, located anterior of p4 in juveniles and below the sis does not reach the premolar level. The horizontal rami midpoint of p4 in larger (older) individuals. Main mandibu- are well divergent; they are wide and vertically convex; lar measurements are provided in Table 2. ventrally, the area from the level below m1 to the base of Dentition: Both upper and lower incisors are narrow the symphysis is flattened. The mental foramen is located (I1, 8.1 mm; i1, 7.4 mm and 7.6 mm) and strongly curved, anteriorly to p4 and at the dorso-ventral midpoint of the with bevelled occlusal surface and enamel only on the la- lateral surface of the dentary. The bottom of the i1 alveolus bial side (Fig. 3B).

Table 1. Comparison of skull dimensions (in mm, except for 9, 12) of Cardiatherium calingastaense sp. nov. following Vucetich et al. (2014b) with other late Miocene Cardiatherium and Recent Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris. Abbreviations: 1, posterior width of the incisive foramen; 2, rostral width at the anterior margin of the anterior root of the zygomatic arch (complete or up to the midline in incomplete specimens); 3, width between the anteriormost points of the scars marking the origin of the masseter medialis muscle; 4, rostral width at the level of P4, measured at the alveolar margin of prism I; 5, rostral width at the posterior margin of the anterior root of the zygomatic arch (complete or up to the midline in incomplete specimens); 6, rostral width at the level of M2, measured at the alveolar margin of prII; 7, distance between the posterior margin of the incisive foramen and P4; 8, P4–M1 anteroposterior length; 9, angle of the beginning of the ventral anterior zygomatic arch and the alveolar series, in lateral view; 10, length of upper diastema; 11, length of P4–M3; 12, relationship (%) between dimensions 10 and 11; 1 holotype of C. paranense and MLP 71-VI-16-1; 2 GHUNLPam 27389 (the smallest) and GHUNLPam 5274 (the largest). Skull dimension 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Cardiatherium calingastaense sp. nov. (INGEO-PV 87) 5.8 29.0 13.5/21.8 18.1/25.1 29.9 32.6 19.0 19.3 18 71.1 56.6 75.3 minimum 3.2 22.6 –/16.0 10.7/– 21.4 24.0 9.0 12.5 18 132.0 131.0 196.8 Cardiatherium paranense (N = 12) maximum 8.0 32.4 –/28.0 19.4/– 37.7 43.9 22.5 22.5 19 175.0 159.0 178.6 minimum 2.5 21.8 –/16.0 12.9/– 22.1 30.5 15.1 10.2 24 244.2 241.5 293.8 Cardiatherium aff. orientalis (N = 5) maximum 3.0 29.0 –/27.0 17.4/– 28.2 36.8 18.8 18.8 26 258.0 253.0 291.3 Cardiatherium patagonicum (MPEF-PV 2521) – – – – – – – – – 75.0 57.0 76 minimum 5.0 16.2 26.2 11.0 20.2 23.6 9.2 11.6 13 25.1 37.2 148.2 Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris (N = 8) maximum 10.2 40.0 34.1 24.6 43.2 52.0 24.2 27.2 17 67.9 79.3 116.8 206 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 64 (1), 2019

A B CD concave. P4 has undulated walls of HPE. The HFI is so deep P4 that it almost splits prI from prII. M3 has nine prisms; prI is bilobed with a deep HPE similar to those of the other upper cheek teeth; the other eight prisms are laminar with a shal- M1 low, open V-shaped labial fissure in prII to prVII whereas in prVIII there is a barely marked labial concavity; as usual in M2 capybaras, prIX is transversally shorter with a convex poste- rior margin and no labial fissure (Figs. 4A4, 5A). Among lower cheek teeth (Figs. 4A5–A9, 6A; Table 4), p4 has a deep h3e, bifurcated at the end, and anteriorly directed. M3 C. calingastaense sp. nov. lacks h4i and h5i as C. paranense (Fig. 6C), whereas h5i is extended up to 25% of the occlusal E surface in C. patagonicum (Fig. 6B), C. orientalis (Fig. 6D) and C. chasicoense (Fig. 6E). C. calingastaense sp. nov. and C. aff. orientalis have no supernumerary internal f lexid (hsni) typical of C. orientalis and C. patagonicum (Fig. 6B, D). The hfe is also deep, wide and transversely directed whereas in 10 mm other species it is oblique. Lingually, the hpi is transversely directed and very deep, reaching almost the labial side, pro- ducing a deformation on this margin; at the same time, the third external flexid (h2e) is markedly concave (Figs. 4A8, Fig. 5. Schematic occlusal view of upper teeth of Cardiatherium (A–C) A9, 6A) whereas in C. patagonicum (also with very deep hpi) and Phugatherium (D–E). A. Cardiatherium calingastaense sp. nov. (late the h2e is only incipient (Fig. 6B). The h2i and h3i are long Miocene, Puchuzum, San Juan Province, Argentina), INGEO-PV 87, right P4–M3. B. Cardiatherium patagonicum (late Miocene, Estancia Rincón A B CDE Chico, Chu but Province, Argentina), MPEF-PV 740/22, reversed left P4; MPEF-PV 740/23, reversed left M1 or M2; MPEF-PV 740/18, right M3. p4 C. Cardiatherium paranense (late Miocene, Ituzaingó Formation, Entre Ríos Province, Argentina), MLP 87-XI-1-27, right P4–M3. D. Phugatherium novum (middle Pliocene, Chapadamalal Formation, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina), MMP 492-S, right P4–M1. E. Phugatherium cataclisticum m1 (late Miocene–Early Pliocene, Monte Hermoso Formation, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina), MLP 15-231a, right M1.

Among upper cheek teeth (Fig. 4A1–A4; Table 3), P4, M1, m2 and M2 are formed by two heart-shaped prisms, joined by a short isthmus. As in all species of Cardiatherium, HPE is deeper than HSE, unlike Phugatherium in which these flexi are almost similar in depth (Fig. 5A–E). In INGEO-PV 87, the m3 HPE is very deep and curved backward, in such a way that in M2 it reaches the labial side and produces a deformation of 10 mm this wall resulting in a strong step-shaped profile (Figs. 4A2, A3, 5A). The HSE is shorter than HPE, but is deeper than in the other species and oriented slightly backward (Fig. 5A–C); only the largest specimen of C. patagonicum has an HSE similar in depth to C. calingastaense sp. nov., but anteriorly

Table 2. Mandibular dimensions (in mm) of Cardiatherium calin- Fig. 6. Schematic occlusal view of lower teeth of Cardiatherium. A. Car- gastaense sp. nov. (INGEO-PV 87). diatherium calingastaense sp. nov. (late Miocene, Puchuzum, San Juan Province, Argentina), holotype, INGEO-PV 87, right p4–m2 and reversed Symphysis length 51.5 left m3. B. Cardiatherium patagonicum (late Miocene, Estancia Rincón Anterior transversal diameter of symphysis 23.6 Chico, Chubut Province, Argentina), MPEF-PV 740/9, reversed left p4; Transversal diameter symphysis at foramen level 31.9 MPEF-PV 740/24, right m1–m2; MPEF-PV 740/7, reversed left m3. Anterior height of symphysis c. 23.4 C. Cardiatherium paranense (late Miocene, Ituzaingó Formation, Entre Height symphysis at foramen level 24.0 Ríos Province, Argentina), MLP 40-XI-15-1, right p4–m3. D. Cardia- Transversal diameter between p4s, anterior to alveolus 30.6 therium orientalis (late Miocene, Camacho Formation, San Gregorio, Uruguay), SPV-FHC-27-XI-64-20, right p4–m3. E. Cardia therium chasi- Height horizontal ramus ahead left p4 20.3 coense (late Miocene, Arroyo Chasicó, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina), Maximum width anterior to lateral crest 67.1 MMP 300-M, right p4–m2; MMH-CH 88-6-71, reversed left m3. CERDEÑO ET AL.—A NEW MIOCENE CAPYBARA FROM ARGENTINA 207

Table 3. Comparison of upper tooth dimensions (in mm) of Cardiatherium. a minimum and maximum values after Vucetich et al. (2014b); * M1 and M2 not differentiated; AW, anterior width, L, length; PW, posterior width; W, width; approximate values in parentheses. P4 M1 M2 M3 L AW PW L AW PW L AW PW L W Cardiatherium calingastaense sp. nov. right 10.0 6.3 7.6 8.8 (8.0) 8.5 8.5 7.7 7.9 28.5 11.0 (INGEO-PV-87) left (9.5) (6.8) – 9.2 98.4 (8.4) (8.9) (7.4) (7.5) – – minimum 8.0 7.2 7.5 8.1 6.7 7.6 12.7 5.1 Cardiatherium chasicoensea* maximum 8.6 7.2 7.6 9.2 7.6 8.3 20.1 8.0 minimum 6.0 4.6 4.6 5.1 4.9 4.6 4.9 5.4 5.4 9.2 5.9 Cardiatherium paranensea maximum 12.0 8.2 9.7 11.0 8.7 9.7 9.1 6.4 7.2 37.5 10.7 minimum 4.8 3.0 3.6 4.0 3.33 4.3 5.6 5.9 5.9 6.8 3.0 Cardiatherium aff. orientalisa maximum 9.7 5.2 6.7 8.9 7.2 7.0 8.1 7.5 7.6 21.5 7.7 minimum 6.8 4.8 6.1 4.4 3.8 4.3 14.1 3.6 Cardiatherium patagonicuma* maximum 9.2 6.5 8.0 9.9 7.0 8.5 25.6 8.5

Table 4. Comparison of lower tooth dimensions (in mm) of Cardiatherium. a minimum and maximum values after Vucetich et al. (2005); b values correspond to the holotype MLP 40-XI-15-1; c values after Deschamps et al. (2009), a very small m1/2 of Cardiatherium patagonicum was not here considered; * m1–m2 not differentiated; AW, anterior width; L, length; MW, medium width; PW, posterior width; approximate values in parentheses. p4 m1 m2 m3 L AW MW PW L AW PW L AW PW L AW MW PW Cardiatherium calingastaense left 14.4 5.3 7.0 6.8 11.7 7.6 7.0 12.2 7.9 8.2 16.3 10.7 11.4 9.7 sp. nov. (INGEO-PV-87) right 13.8 5.3 6.7 6.9 11.5 7.3 7.0 12.6 (8.1) 8.0 17.0 10.9 11.7 – minimum 9.7 4.0 5.1 5.1 5.7 4.0 4.1 8.9 4.9 6.4 12.6 8.0 – – Cardiatherium paranensea maximumb 19.8 6.4 7.8 8.8 15.8 9.6 10.1 17.6 9.6 11.6 21.7 10.4 – – Cardiatherium orientalis (holotype)a 11.2 4.6 5.2 5.9 9.6 5.6 6.1 0.3 6.0 7.0 13.4 7.0 – – minimum 9.9 3.8 4.8 4.9 8.0 4.5 5.1 >8 5.3 >5 13.6 8.2 – – Cardiatherium aff. orientalisa maximum 23.0 8.5 10.6 11.2 18.5 12.1 10.2 20.9 >11 12.4 15.2 9.1 – – minimum 7.2 2.8 3.3 3.8 5.6 3.3 3.2 – 7.2 – – Cardiatherium patagonicuma,* maximum 12.0 4.6 5.9 6.2 13.3 8.8 9.2 – 9.6 – – minimumc 6.3 2.1 3.2 3.6 6.1 3.4 5.3 9.7 4.8 6.1 5.8 Cardiatherium chasicoense* maximumc 13.7 4.8 6.8 7.3 11.5 7.6 7.6 15.5 7.6 8.6 9.4 and also bifurcated at the end, and both delimit a conspicuous Mones 1965a; Mones 1991, who adds two other specimens), internal column (c3). In C. patagonicum, h2i is much shal- the flexids are anteroposteriorly wider; the p4 has deeper lower than h3i; in C. paranense (Fig. 6C) and C. chasicoense h4i and no h2e; h2i and h3i are shallower, especially the for- (Fig. 6E), these flexids are shallower and similar in depth, mer; and the m3 shows a deep hsi, more anteriorly directed those of the latter being the shallowest. than in C. calingastaense sp. nov., which is reflected in a The m1–m2 are similar in morphology (Figs. 4A6, 6A). longer and more triangular first prism. The hsi penetrates less than 50% of the width of prI as in the Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Late Miocene, mid- other species of Cardiatherium, whereas hti is deep (crossing dle section of the Las Flores Formation. Right side of the the prism but not splitting as in C. patagonicum; Fig. 6B) and Phugatherium) and bifurcated at the end, producing a defor- Candelaria Creek, Puchuzum area, Calingasta Valley, San mation of the labial margin at this point. The hse is deep and Juan Province, central-west Argentina.. wide. The m3 is the longest molar of the series, and flexids are not bifurcated. This molar has a conspicuous labial col- umn in the posterior ramus of prIIa, delimited by two acces- Phylogenetic analysis sory fissures between hse and hfe (Figs. 4A7, 6A). The previous comparative description has been focused We assessed the phylogenetic affinities of C. calingastaense on the best-known species, but some comparison can also be sp. nov. using the dataset and protocols presented in previ- provided for two other poorly known taxa. In C. isseli (holo- ous studies (Pérez et al. 2018; Madozzo Jaén et al. 2018; see type and only specimen MACN 6354; middle Miocene, Río SOM 1–3). The parsimony analysis of the combined dataset Negro Province; Rovereto 1914), the p4 is quite similar, but (including morphological and molecular partitions) resulted the m3 differs because the anterior margin of prI is straight in 333 most parsimonious trees (MPTs) of 3364 steps. The and the hsi is very deep. In C. talicei (holotype SPV-FHC- strict consensus of all MPTs is shown in SOM 3. Figure 7 10-VIII-63-1; Pliocene, San Gregorio, Uruguay; Francis and displays the node Hydrochoerinae in the strict consensus. 208 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 64 (1), 2019

Global South scale American Kerodon Hydrochoerus stage/age stage/age

Ma

Epoch Neochoerus “Ionian” Bonaerian 1 Calabrian Ensena-

Phugatherium dichroplax dan “cardiomyines”

Pleistocene 90 2 Gelasian

Hydrochoeropsis wayuu

?

Hydrochoeropsis dasseni

sp. nov. Marplatan 3 Piacen-

Phugatherium novum zian Caviodon pozzii Caviodon cuyano

Chapad- orientalis malalan

aff. 4

Phugatherium cataclisticum

Phugatherium saavedrai

Caviodon australis Pliocene Zanclean Monte- hermosan

Caviodon andalhualensis

Caviodon multiplicatus Cardiomys cavinus

Cardiatherium paranense

Cardiatherium

Cardiatherium calingastaense Cardiatherium patagonicum Cardiomys ameghinorum 66 5 93 largest capybaras

6 Messinian Huay- querian

7

Cardiatherium chasicoense 8

Allocavia chasicoense

Xenocardia diversidens Procardiomys martinoi

Cardiomys leufuensis E D C Chasi- B coan 54 A 85

Miocene 9 52 Cardiatherium Tortonian

10

andinus

?

11

Cardiomys

Mayoan 52 12 Serra- Hydrochoerinae vallian Laventan

Fig. 7. Stratigraphic adjustment of the strict consensus tree for the phylogenetic analysis of Hydrochoerinae (333 MPTs of 3364 steps). Upper case letters indicate the nodes within Hydrochoerinae, as described in the main text. Silhouettes reflect external aspect and relative size of representatives of the main clades within Hydrochoerinae. CERDEÑO ET AL.—A NEW MIOCENE CAPYBARA FROM ARGENTINA 209

Our phylogenetic analysis recovers the monophyly of choerus, and Hydrochoerus) would have originated at least Cardiatherium (Fig. 7: node B and SOM 3). At the same time, during the Chasicoan SALMA, in view of the phylogenetic this clade is the sister group of the largest capybaras (a clade position of C. chasicoense. The evolutionary novelties such including Hydrochoeropsis, Phugatherium, Neochoerus as the increasing complexity of molariforms (e.g., presence and Hydrochoerus; Fig. 7). Cardiatherium calingastaense of h2.i, h5.i, h2.e, c3 on p4, presence of hse on m1–m2, ad- sp. nov. is the sister group of the other species of the genus dition of laminar prisms in M3) would have been achieved (Fig. 7: node B). Cardiatherium and the largest capybaras during the Chasicoan SALMA. In turn, the novel traits that (Fig. 7: node A) share the following unambiguous synapo- characterize the clade including the largest capybaras (e.g., morphies: root of the lower incisors extending up to the level deepening of flexi/flexids splitting transversally the prisms) of the anterior lobe of m2 (ch. 20); concave palatal surface (ch. would have been acquired at some point in time between the 55); presence of h2i on p4 (ch. 86); anterior location of h3i (ch. Chasicoan and SALMAs, suggested by the 90); hpi deeper than h5i (ch. 96); c3 present on prI of p4 (ch. presence of an extensive ghost lineage (Fig. 7; see Pérez et 98); oblique h3e (ch. 101); posterior prism of m1–m2 complex al. 2018 for discussion on basal forms of “cardiomyines”). heart-shaped (ch. 106); presence of hti on m1–m2 (ch. 109); hsi shallower than hpi on m1 (ch. 114); hpi in m1–m2 reach- ing the labial end (ch. 115); presence of hse on m1–m2 (ch. Concluding remarks 116); p4–m1 shorter than m2–m3 (ch. 121); m1

biota in northeastern Patagonia (Península Valdés, Chubut, Argentina). Pol, D. and Norell, M.A. 2001. Comments on the Manhattan Stratigraphic Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 297: 100–109. Measure. Cladistics 17: 266–281. Dunnum, J.L. 2015. Family Caviidae. In: J.L. Patton, U.F.J. Pardiñas, and Prámparo, M.B., Papú, O.H., and Contreras, V.H. 1998. Primer registro G. D’Elía, (eds.), Mammals of South America, Vol. 2, Rodents, 690–726. palinológico en el Neógeno de la localidad de Puchuzum, provincia University of Chicago Press, Chicago. de San Juan, Argentina. VII Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Fischer, G. 1817. Adversaria zoologica. Mémoires de la Societé Imperiale Bioestratigrafía, Resúmenes: 27. des Naturalistes de Moscou 5: 357–428. Rovereto, C. 1914. Los estratos araucanos y sus fósiles. Anales del Museo Francis, J.C. and Mones, A. 1965a. Sobre el hallazgo de Cardiatherium tal- Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires 25: 1–250. icei n. sp. (Rodentia, Hydrochoeridae) en la Playa Kiyú, departamento Rowe, D.L. and Honeycutt, R.L. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships, eco- de San José, República Oriental del Uruguay. Kraglieviana 1: 3–44. logical correlates, and molecular evolution within the Cavioidea Francis, J.C. and Mones, A. 1965b. Sobre el hallazgo de Kiyutherium ori- (Mammalia, Rodentia). Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 263– entalis n. g. n. sp. (Rodentia, Hydrochoeridae) en la Formación Kiyú 277. de las barrancas de San Gregorio, departamento de San José, Repúbli- Rusconi, C. 1933. Apuntes preliminares sobre las arenas puelchenses y su ca Oriental del Uruguay. Kraglieviana 1: 45–54. fauna. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina 116: 169–193. Gill, T. 1872. Arrangements of the families of mammals with analytical Rusconi, C. 1935. Tres nuevas especies de mamíferos del Puelchense de tables. Smithsonian Miscelaneous Collections 11: 1–998. Villa Ballester. Boletín Paleontológico de Buenos Aires 5: 1–3. Goloboff, P.A. and Catalano, S.A. 2016. TNT version 1.5, including a full im- Rusconi, C. 1944. Especies nuevas de mamíferos del Puelchense de Bue- plementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 32: 221–238. nos Aires. Boletín Paleontológico de Buenos Aires 16: 1–3. Gray, J.E. 1825. An outline of an attempt at the disposition of the Mamma- Suvires, G. and Contreras, V.H. 2011. Late Cenozoic geology and geomor- lia into tribes and families with a list of the genera apparently apper- phology of Loma de Las Tapias area, San Juan, west central Argentina. taining to each tribe. Annals of Philosophy (new series) 10: 337–344. In: J.A. Salfity and R.A. Marquillas (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Jordan, T.E., Kelley, S., Fernández, A., Fernández Seveso, F., Ré, G., and Central Andes of Argentina, 111–121. SCS Publisher, Salta. Milana, J.P. 1997. Vinculaciones entre las historias de las cuencas de Tullberg, T. 1899. Uber das System der Nagethiere: eine phylogenetische Iglesia y del Bermejo. Actas de las Jornadas de Geología de Precor- Studie. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsalensis 3: 1–514. dillera 2: 142–147. Upham, N.S. and Patterson, B.D. 2015. Phylogeny and evolution of cavio- Kraglievich, L. 1930. Los más grandes carpinchos actuales y fósiles de la morph rodents: a complete timetree for living genera. In: A. Vassallo subfamilia Hydrochoerinae. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argenti- and D. Antonucci (eds.), Biology of Caviomorph Rodents, Diversity na 110: 233–250. and Evolution, 63–120. Sociedad Argentina para el estudio de los León, L.I. and Bracco, A. 2008. Evidencias de actividad orgánica en sed- Mamíferos, Mendoza. imentos fluviales del área de Puchuzum (Neógeno), Departamento Vucetich, M.G. and Pérez, M.E. 2011. The putative cardiomyines (Roden- de Calingasta, San Juan. XII Reunión Argentina de Sedimentología, tia, Cavioidea) of the middle Miocene of Patagonia (Argentina) and Resúmenes: 94. the differentiation of the Family Hydrochoeridae. Journal of Verte- Madozo Jaén, M.C., Pérez, M.E., Montalvo, C.I., and Tomassini, R. 2018. brate Paleontology 31: 1382–1386. Systematic review of Neocavia from the Neogene of Argentina: Phylo- Vucetich, M.G., Deschamps, C.M., and Pérez, M.E. 2012. Palaeontology, genetic and evolutionary implications. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica evolution and systematics of capybaras. In: J.R. Moreira, K.M.P.M. de 63: 241–260. Barros Ferraz, E.A. Herrera, and D.W. Macdonald (eds.), Capybara: Milana, J.P. 1994. Secuencias aluviales asociadas a variaciones hidrológi- Biology, Use and Conservation of a Valuable Neotropical Resource, cas: consideraciones teóricas y ejemplos. Asociación Argentina de 39–59. Springer Science and Business Media, New York. Sedimentología, Revista 1: 103–124. Vucetich, M.G., Deschamps, C.M., and Pérez, M.E. 2015. The first capy- Mones, A. 1984. Estudios sobre la familia Hydrochoeridae, XIV. Re- baras (Rodentia, Caviidae, Hydrochoerinae) involved in the Great visión sistemática (Mammalia: Rodentia). Senckerbergiana Biolo- American Biotic Interchange. Ameghiniana 52: 324–333. gica 65: 1–17. Vucetich, M.G., Deschamps, C.M., Morgan, C.C., and Forasiepi, A.M. Mones, A. 1991. Monografía de la familia Hydrochoeridae (Mammalia: 2011. A new species of Cardiomyinae (Rodentia, Hydrochoeridae) Rodentia). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 134: 1–235. from western Argentina. Its age and considerations on ontogeny and Mones, A. and Ojasti, J. 1986. Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris. Mammalian diversity of the subfamily. Ameghiniana 48: 556–567. Species 264: 1–7. Vucetich, M.G., Deschamps, C.M., Olivares, A.I., and Dozo, M.T. 2005. Novak, R.M. 1991. Walker’s Mammals of the World, Vol. 2. 5th Edition, Capybaras, size, shape, and time: a model kit. Acta Paleontologica 642 pp. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Polonica 50: 59–272. Pascual, R. and Bondesio, P. 1963. Un nuevo tipo de morfología dentaria Vucetich, M.G., Deschamps, C.M., Pérez, M.E., and Montalvo, C.I. 2014a. en un Cardiatheriinae (Rodentia, Hydrochoeridae) del Plioceno inferi- The taxonomic status of the Pliocene capybaras (Rodentia) Phugathe- or de Huachipampa (San Juan). Ameghiniana 3: 43–49. rium Ameghino and Chapalmatherium Ameghino. Ameghiniana 51: Pascual, R. and Bondesio, P. 1968. Los Cardiatheriinae (Rodentia, Cav- 173–183. iomorpha) de la Formación Arroyo Chasicó (Plioceno inferior) de la Vucetich, M.G., Deschamps, C.M., Vieytes, E.C., and Montalvo, C.I. provincia de Buenos Aires. Ameghiniana 5: 237–251. 2014b. Late Miocene capybaras from Argentina: skull anatomy, tax- Peralta, S., Muñoz, M., and Contreras, V.H. 1995. El Neógeno fosilífero onomy, evolution, and biochronology. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica de Puchuzum, valle de Calingasta, provincia de San Juan, Argentina. 59: 517–535. Ciencias 4: 57–62. Waterhouse, G.E. 1839. Observations on the Rodentia, with a view to point Perea, D., Rinderknecht, A., Ubilla, M., Bostelmann, E., and Martínez, S. out the groups, as indicated by the structure of the crania in this order 2013. Mamíferos y estratigrafía del Neógeno de Uruguay. Publicación of Mammals. Magazine of Natural History 3: 90–96, 593–600. Especial de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina 14: 192–206. Wetten, C. 1975. Estudio geológico-económico de un yacimiento de di- Pérez, M.E. and Pol, D. 2012. Major radiations in the evolution of Cavi- atomitas y análisis de mercado. Congreso Iberoamericano de Geología id rodents: reconciling fossils, ghost lineages, and relaxed molecular Económica, Actas 5: 513–529. clocks. PLoS ONE 7: e48380. Yrigoyen, M. 1993. Los depósitos sinorogénicos terciarios. Geología y Pérez, M.E., Deschamps, C.M., and Vucetich, M.G. 2018. Diversity, phy- recursos naturales de Mendoza. In: V.A. Ramos (ed.), XII Congreso logeny, and biogeography of the South American “cardiomyine” ro- Geológico Argentino y II Congreso de Explotación de Hidrocarburos, dents (Hystricognathi, Cavioidea) with a description of two new spe- Relatorio 1, 123–148. Asociación Geológica Argentina e Instituto Ar- cies. Papers in Palaeontology 4: 1–19. gentino de Petróleo, Buenos Aires. 212 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 64 (1), 2019 Appendix 1

List of revised material of Cardiatherium.

Cardiatherium chasicoense: MMP 300-M (holotype of Procardia- Pam 5274; skull with both P4–M3, rostrum, right orbital area and therium chasicoense), fragment of right mandible with p4–m3; damaged skull roof; GHUNLPam 8978, small fragment of palate MMH-CH 85-4-40, almost complete right mandible with i1, p4, with left M1–2; GHUNLPam 14452, palate with both P4–M3 and m1, and m3; Las Barrancas Member (= FSC facies) of the Arroyo posterior portion of rostrum; GHUNLPam 14661, distorted skull Chasicó Formation, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina; PVSJ-537, with both P4–M3; GHUNLPam 14985, damaged rostrum with palate fragment with right and left P4–M3 and associated mandi- right incisor, right P4–M2 and left P4; GHUNLPam 27389, skull ble with p4–m3; Arenisca Albardón Member of the Loma de Las with both P4–M3, incisors, a left mandible fragment with p4–m3, Tapias Formation, San Juan Province, Argentina. and six cervical vertebrae articulated to skull; MLP 62-XII-4-17, left mandible fragment with p4–m3 and palatal fragment with left Cardiatherium paranense: MLP 40-XI-15-1 (neotype), right man- P4–M3 and right P4–M1 (the palatal fragment is currently lost). dibular fragment with p4–m3; MLP 87-XI-1-27 (holotype of Ana- tochoerus inusitatus), incomplete skull with both P4–M3; and MLP Cardiatherium rosendoi: MLP 29-X-8-26 (holotype and single 78-II-27-1 (holotype of Kiyutherium scillatoyanei), right mandibu- specimen of Kiyutherium rosendoi), left mandibular fragment with lar fragment with p4–m3. “Conglomerado osífero” of the Ituzaingó p4, m1 and part of m2; Puerta de Corral Quemado, Andalhuala Formation (= “Mesopotamiense”), Entre Ríos Province, Argentina. Formation (“Araucanian”, late Miocene), Catamarca Province, Ar- gentina. Cardiatherium orientalis: SPV-FHC 27-XI-64-20 (holotype of Kiyutherium orientalis), right mandible with p4–m3; San Pedro Cardiatherium patagonicum: MPEF-PV 740/1, holotype, right Member (or Kiyú Lithofacies) of the Camacho Formation (see mandibular fragment with m1–m2; MPEF-PV 740/2, isolated right Perea et al., 2013); Barrancas de San Gregorio, San José, Uruguay. m1 or m2; MPEF-PV 740/9, left p4; MPEF-PV 740/11, incomplete left p4; and MPEF-PV 740/24, isolated right m1 or m2; Estancia Cardiatherium aff. orientalis: GHUNLPam 139, damaged skull Rincón Chico, upper levels of the Puerto Madryn Formation, Penín- fragment with both M1–3; GHUNLPam 2009, skull fragment with sula Valdés, Chubut Province. MPEF-PV 2521, complete skull; both P4–M3; GHUNLPam 5236, anterior fragment of palate with La Pastosa, Puerto Madryn Formation, Península Valdés, Chubut anterior root of the zygomatic arch, both P4 and left M1; GHUNL- Province (data after Dozo et al. 2010).