DOCSLIB.ORG

The Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) Access, Possibility of Protection, Security and Humanitarian Situation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) Access, Possibility of Protection, Security and Humanitarian Situation 1/2016 The Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) Access, Possibility of Protection, Security and Humanitarian Situation Report from fact finding mission to Erbil, the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) and Beirut, Lebanon 26 September to 6 October 2015 Copenhagen, April 2016 Danish Immigration Service Ryesgade 53 2100 Copenhagen Ø Phone: 00 45 35 36 66 00 Web: www.newtodenmark.dk E-mail: [email protected] Content DISCLAIMER ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 6 ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. OUTLINE OF THE SOCIOECONOMIC AND POLITICAL SITUATION IN THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ...................10 1.1 WAVES OF IDPS ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 SCARCITY OF RESOURCES AND PRESSURE ON THE INFRASTRUCTURE ........................................................................................ 11 1.3 DISPUTED TERRITORIES IN NORTHERN IRAQ ...................................................................................................................... 12 1.4 INTERNAL POLITICAL SPLIT IN THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ............................................................................................. 12 2. ACCESS TO THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ AND OTHER KURDISH CONTROLLED AREAS....................................14 2.1 SPONSORSHIP AS A REQUIREMENT FOR ACCESS TO THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ ................................................................ 14 2.2 CONDITIONS AT THE LAND BORDER ................................................................................................................................. 18 2.3 ACCESS THROUGH AIRPORTS .......................................................................................................................................... 19 2.4 POSSIBILITY FOR IRAQI NON-KURDS FROM OUTSIDE OF IRAQ TO SETTLE IN THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ ................................. 20 2.5 ACCESS TO THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ FOR KURDS FROM KIRKUK ................................................................................. 21 2.6 FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT INSIDE THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ AND OTHER KURDISH CONTROLLED AREAS ............................... 21 2.7 REISSUANCE OF LOST CIVIL DOCUMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 25 2.8 DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT WITH REGARD TO ACCESS TO THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ ......................................................... 26 3. THE SECURITY SITUATION IN THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ AND OTHER KURDISH CONTROLLED AREAS ........28 3.1 THE SECURITY SITUATION FOR IDPS IN THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ ................................................................................ 28 3.2 THE SECURITY SITUATION IN KIRKUK ................................................................................................................................ 29 3.3 THE SECURITY SITUATION IN OTHER KURDISH CONTROLLED AREAS ......................................................................................... 29 3.4 FORCED RETURNS AND RELOCATIONS OF IDPS INTO CAMPS ................................................................................................. 31 3.5 EXPOSURE TO ARBITRARY PHYSICAL DANGER IN KURDISH CONTROLLED AREAS.......................................................................... 32 3.6 PRESENCE AND ACTIVITIES OF ISLAMIC STATE IN THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ AND OTHER KURDISH CONTROLLED AREAS ........... 34 3.7 PRESENCE AND ACTIVITIES OF SHIA MILITIAS IN THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ AND OTHER KURDISH CONTROLLED AREAS ............. 36 3.8 THE KURDISH SECURITY APPARATUS ................................................................................................................................ 38 3.9 TENSIONS AND COOPERATION BETWEEN ARMED GROUPS .................................................................................................... 42 3.10 GENERAL SECURITY IN IDP CAMPS IN KURDISH CONTROLLED AREAS..................................................................................... 43 4. EFFECTIVENESS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ AND THE KURDISH CONTROLLED AREAS ........................................................................................................................................................................45 4.1. GENERAL POSSIBILITY TO SEEK PROTECTION FROM KURDISH AUTHORITIES .............................................................................. 45 4.2. GENERAL POSSIBILITY TO SEEK PROTECTION FROM OTHER ACTORS THAN THE AUTHORITIES ........................................................ 46 4.3 PROTECTION OF WOMEN IN CASES OF HONOUR CRIMES ...................................................................................................... 46 4.4 PROTECTION IN CASES OF LANDOWNERSHIP CONFLICTS ....................................................................................................... 48 4.5 PROTECTION FROM KURDISH AUTHORITIES IN CASES OF CONFLICTS WITH ARMED GROUPS ......................................................... 50 4.6 PROTECTION IN CASE OF HARASSMENT BASED ON ETHNIC AND RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION .............................................................. 50 5. ACCESS TO BASIC RIGHTS .......................................................................................................................................52 5.1 ACCESS TO EMPLOYMENT .............................................................................................................................................. 52 5.2 POSSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR IDPS ................................................................................................................. 53 2 5.3 ACCESS TO HOUSING .................................................................................................................................................... 54 5.4 IDPS LIVING IN CAMPS ................................................................................................................................................. 56 5.5 ACCESS TO FOOD, WATER AND ELECTRICITY ...................................................................................................................... 58 5.6 ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE ............................................................................................................................................... 59 5.7 ACCESS TO EDUCATION ................................................................................................................................................. 60 5.8 VULNERABLE GROUPS .................................................................................................................................................. 61 CONSULTED SOURCES ................................................................................................................................................64 WRITTEN SOURCES ....................................................................................................................................................65 APPENDIX 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE ..........................................................................................................................67 APPENDIX 2: MEETING NOTES ...................................................................................................................................69 AN INDEPENDENT RESEARCHER ................................................................................................................................69 AN INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN ORGANISATION, KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ ..............................................80 AN INTERNATIONAL NGO ..........................................................................................................................................87 A LAWYER WORKING FOR AN INTERNATIONAL NGO IN THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ ......................................92 SKYPE MEETING WITH A SCHOLAR SPECIALIZED IN KURDISH ISSUES .........................................................................98 A WESTERN DIPLOMAT ............................................................................................................................................ 101 ERBIL GOVERNORATE, ERBIL REFUGEE COUNCIL (ERC), VIAN RASHEED YOUNIS, DIRECTOR, EXPERT CIVIL ENGINEER AND PETER JOSHI, SENIOR HUMANITARIAN ADVISOR (SECONDEE) ......................................................................... 108 HEAD OF THE GENERAL SECURITY DIRECTORATE, ASAYISH, ESMAT ARGUSHI ......................................................... 117 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, CHRISTOPH WILCKE, SENIOR RESEARCHER ...................................................................... 119 IOM, DAIHEI MOCHIZUKI, PROGRAM MANAGER; ZAHRAA SABER, OPERATION OFFICER ERBIL HUB AND WRIA RASHID, HEAD OF ANKAWA OFFICE ......................................................................................................................... 131 INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE, ALEKSANDAR MILUTINOVIC, COUNTRY DIRECTOR ....................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Future of Mosul Before, During, and After the Liberation
    1 The Future of Mosul Before, During, and After the Liberation Dylan O’Driscoll Research Fellow Middle East Research Institute September 2016 About MERI The Middle East Research Institute engages in policy issues contributing to the process of state building and democratisation in the Middle East. Through independent analysis and policy debates, our research aims to promote and develop good governance, human rights, rule of law and social and economic prosperity in the region. It was established in 2014 as an independent, not-for-profit organisation based in Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Middle East Research Institute 1186 Dream City Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq T: +964 (0)662649690 E: [email protected] www.meri-k.org NGO registration number. K843 © Middle East Research Institute, 2016 The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the author. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Please direct all enquiries to the publisher. About the Author Dylan O’Driscoll is a Research Fellow in International Politics and National Security Programme at the Middle East Research Institute (MERI). He holds a PhD and MA from the University of Exeter, UK. Acknowledgments I would like to thank all the interviewees and people I had discussions with on the topic for giving me their time, local knowledge and personal insights. A very special thanks goes to Shivan Fazil for his help in organising the interviews and kick off workshop, his input towards the project and for his much-needed interpreting skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Alternative Report Submitted by The
    Joint Alternative Report submitted by the Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) and Al-Haq to the Human Rights Committee on the occasion of the consideration of the Third Periodic Report of Israel Israel’s violations of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights with regard to house demolitions, forced evictions and safe water and sanitation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel Submitted June 2010 COHRE and Al-Haq are independent non-governmental organisations in UN ECOSOC Special Consultative Status Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................3 2. ISRAEL’S LEGAL OBLIGATIONS IN THE OPT........................................4 3. FORCED EVICTIONS AND HOUSE DEMOLITIONS .............................6 3.1 Punitive House Demolitions..................................................................................6 3.1.1 West Bank ......................................................................................................6 3.1.2 Gaza .............................................................................................................11 3.2 Administrative House Demolitions......................................................................16 3.2.1 West Bank...................................................................................................16 3.2.2 Israel: Mixed Cities.....................................................................................24 3.3. Other Forced Evictions......................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Through No Fault of Their Own: Punitive House Demolitions During
    בצלם-מרכז המידע הישראלי לזכויות האדם בשטחים (ע.ר.) B'TSELEM - The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories Information Sheet November 2004 Through No Fault of Their Own Punitive House Demolitions during the al - Aqsa Intifada Researched and written by Ronen Shnayderman Edited by Yehezkel Lein Data coordination by Suhair ‘Aabdi, Yael Handelsman, Sohad Sakalla Fieldwork by ‘Atef Abu a-Rob, Musa Abu Hashhash, Salma Dab’i, Iyad Haddad, Zaki Kahil, Mazen al-Majdalawi, ‘Abd al-Karim a-S’adi, Suha Zeyd Translated by Zvi Shulman Cover photo: Palestinian boy removes family possessions from the ruins of his home, in Bethlehem, which the IDF blew up on 15 June 2004 (Magnus Johansson, Reuters) ISSN 0792-8114 B ’ TSELEM Information Sheet November 2004 Through No Fault of Their Own Punitive House Demolitions during the al-Aqsa Intifada B’TSELEM - The Israeli Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories was founded in 1989 by a group of lawyers, authors, academics, journalists, and Knesset members. B’Tselem documents human rights abuses in the Occupied Territories and brings them to the attention of policymakers and the general public. Its data are based on independent fieldwork and research, official sources, the media, and data from Palestinian and Israeli human rights organizations. How long does it take to demolish a house? It takes a year to build it. Sometimes a hundred years. And there are some houses that have always been there. How long does it take to demolish a house? Less time than is spent thinking about whether it should have been demolished.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Opposition to the Government in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI)
    Country Policy and Information Note Iraq: Opposition to the government in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) Version 2.0 June 2021 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules • The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Piece of the Puzzle: Achieving Lasting Stability in Post
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF IRAQ SULAIMANI Institute of Regional and International Studies TheChallenges Last Piece and ofOpportunities the Puzzle: Achievingin post-ISIS LastingTerritories: Stability in PostThe Case ISIS ofJalawla Rabia By Christine McCaffray van den Toorn andBy ChristineAhmed Ali M. van den Toorn What is the IRIS Iraq Report (IIR)? The IRIS Iraq Report (IIR) provides “on-the-ground” is aimed at providing decision-makers and experts with solid research and analysis of Iraq policy. The Report is unique because it is produced in Iraq, and is based on in- brainchild of Ahmed Ali and Christine van den Toorn, both of whom have years of experience researching and writing on Iraq and the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. [email protected] American University of Iraq, Sulaimani /IRISmideast Sulaimani – Kirkuk Main Road, Raparin /IRISmideast Sulaimani, Iraq Jalawla Bazar, May 2015 Jalawla Bazar, April 2016 What will it take to restore peace and stability to areas liberated from ISIS? How can Iraq deal with the challenges of disputed territories? These are two of the biggest questions facing authorities in the country at present. Jalawla, a subdistrict of Khanaqin in Diyala province, may provide some important answers for how to handle these challenges in the future. The town is a microcosm of some of the wider political, territorial and economic challenges facing Iraqi authorities, and the measures taken there to restore stability after it was liberated from ISIS in November 2014 offer salutary lessons for Iraqi authorities, both in terms of how to achieve success, and the longer-term obstacles that will need to be overcome in order to consolidate it areas of the country that are disputed between the federal government in Baghdad and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG).
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq 2019 Human Rights Report
    IRAQ 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Iraq is a constitutional parliamentary republic. The 2018 parliamentary elections, while imperfect, generally met international standards of free and fair elections and led to the peaceful transition of power from Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi to Adil Abd al-Mahdi. On December 1, in response to protesters’ demands for significant changes to the political system, Abd al-Mahdi submitted his resignation, which the Iraqi Council of Representatives (COR) accepted. As of December 17, Abd al-Mahdi continued to serve in a caretaker capacity while the COR worked to identify a replacement in accordance with the Iraqi constitution. Numerous domestic security forces operated throughout the country. The regular armed forces and domestic law enforcement bodies generally maintained order within the country, although some armed groups operated outside of government control. Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) consist of administratively organized forces within the Ministries of Interior and Defense, and the Counterterrorism Service. The Ministry of Interior is responsible for domestic law enforcement and maintenance of order; it oversees the Federal Police, Provincial Police, Facilities Protection Service, Civil Defense, and Department of Border Enforcement. Energy police, under the Ministry of Oil, are responsible for providing infrastructure protection. Conventional military forces under the Ministry of Defense are responsible for the defense of the country but also carry out counterterrorism and internal security operations in conjunction with the Ministry of Interior. The Counterterrorism Service reports directly to the prime minister and oversees the Counterterrorism Command, an organization that includes three brigades of special operations forces. The National Security Service (NSS) intelligence agency reports directly to the prime minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Protection of Civilians in the Armed Conflict in Iraq
    HUMAN RIGHTS UNAMI Office of the United Nations United Nations Assistance Mission High Commissioner for for Iraq – Human Rights Office Human Rights Report on the Protection of Civilians in the Armed Conflict in Iraq: 11 December 2014 – 30 April 2015 “The United Nations has serious concerns about the thousands of civilians, including women and children, who remain captive by ISIL or remain in areas under the control of ISIL or where armed conflict is taking place. I am particularly concerned about the toll that acts of terrorism continue to take on ordinary Iraqi people. Iraq, and the international community must do more to ensure that the victims of these violations are given appropriate care and protection - and that any individual who has perpetrated crimes or violations is held accountable according to law.” − Mr. Ján Kubiš Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General in Iraq, 12 June 2015, Baghdad “Civilians continue to be the primary victims of the ongoing armed conflict in Iraq - and are being subjected to human rights violations and abuses on a daily basis, particularly at the hands of the so-called Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Ensuring accountability for these crimes and violations will be paramount if the Government is to ensure justice for the victims and is to restore trust between communities. It is also important to send a clear message that crimes such as these will not go unpunished’’ - Mr. Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 12 June 2015, Geneva Contents Summary ...................................................................................................................................... i Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Methodology ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of 'Iraq
    [Distributed to the Official No. : C. 49. 1929. VI. Members of the Council.] [C.P.M.834] Geneva, February 20th, 1929. LEAGUE OF NATIONS CONSTITUTION OF ‘IRAQ (ORGANIC LAW) Note by the Secretary- General : The Secretary-General communicated to the Council, on August 23rd, 1924 (document C.412.1924.VI, C.P.M. 166),1 a letter from the British Government transmitting a translation of the Organic Law of ‘Iraq passed by the Constituent Assembly of ‘Iraq on July 10th, 1924. In a letter dated November 28th, 1928, the British Government transmitted the following document : The ‘Iraq Constitution, March 21st, 1925, recently published by the Government of ‘Iraq. The British Government points out, in the above-mentioned letter, that the publication of the document in question was necessitated by the discovery of considerable discrepancies between the Arabic text of the Organic Law, as passed by the ‘Iraq Constituent Assembly in July 1924, and the English translation which was communicated to the Secretariat in 1924. The British Government adds that the new text embodies the modifications introduced by the Organic Law Amendment Law, 1925,2 and was approved by the ‘Iraq Government as superseding all translations of the law hitherto published. The Secretary-General has the honour to communicate to the Council the text of the document transmitted by the British Government on November 28th, 1928. 1 See Official Journal, November 1924, page 1759. * The Organic Law Amendment Law, 1925, was published as an Appendix to the Annual Report on the Adminis­ tration of ‘Iraq for 1925, pages 175-177. S.d.N.
    [Show full text]
  • And Property Law: the Iraqi Civil Code and Its Compatibility with International Standards for the Treatment of Displaced Persons
    Of “Principles” and Property Law: The Iraqi Civil Code and its Compatibility with International Standards for the Treatment of Displaced Persons Dan E. Stigall∗ A recent report by Refugees International notes that Iraq is currently faced with one of the most acute displacement crises in the world, with over 5 million Iraqis displaced by violence – 2.7 million of whom are internally displaced within Iraq.1 Such a situation creates not only a humanitarian crisis but also a perverse opportunity for insurgents and militia groups to exploit the displacement crisis in order to legitimate themselves and achieve geo-political goals.2 It is critical, therefore, to find adequate remedies for displaced persons and forge a sustainable, long-term solution to the ongoing displacement crisis. It is equally important to find remedies and mechanisms for restitution that comport with international standards. Those standards are not the easiest to discern as there is no comprehensive treaty setting forth all the rights and obligations owed by states vis-à-vis displaced persons. As a result, one must look to numerous other instruments such as the ∗ Dan E. Stigall is a U.S. Army Judge Advocate (JAG). J.D., 2000, Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center; B.A., 1996, Louisiana State University. Any opinion expressed is solely that of the author and not necessarily the United States Department of Defense. This article was prepared for the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) in conjunction with a conference in Amman, Jordan. The discussion of Iraqi substantive law was taken largely from Iraqi Civil Law: Its Sources, Substance, and Sundering, 16 J.
    [Show full text]
  • In Pursuit of Freedom, Justice, Dignity, and Democracy
    In pursuit of freedom, justice, dignity, and democracy Rojava’s social contract Institutional development in (post) – conflict societies “In establishing this Charter, we declare a political system and civil administration founded upon a social contract that reconciles the rich mosaic of Syria through a transitional phase from dictatorship, civil war and destruction, to a new democratic society where civil life and social justice are preserved”. Wageningen University Social Sciences Group MSc Thesis Sociology of Development and Change Menno Molenveld (880211578090) Supervisor: Dr. Ir. J.P Jongerden Co – Supervisor: Dr. Lotje de Vries 1 | “In pursuit of freedom, justice, dignity, and democracy” – Rojava’s social contract Abstract: Societies recovering from Civil War often re-experience violent conflict within a decade. (1) This thesis provides a taxonomy of the different theories that make a claim on why this happens. (2) These theories provide policy instruments to reduce the risk of recurrence, and I asses under what circumstances they can best be implemented. (3) I zoom in on one policy instrument by doing a case study on institutional development in the north of Syria, where governance has been set – up using a social contract. After discussing social contract theory, text analysis and in depth interviews are used to understand the dynamics of (post) conflict governance in the northern parts of Syria. I describe the functioning of several institutions that have been set –up using a social contract and relate it to “the policy instruments” that can be used to mitigate the risk of conflict recurrence. I conclude that (A) different levels of analysis are needed to understand the dynamics in (the north) of Syria and (B) that the social contract provides mechanisms to prevent further conflict and (C) that in terms of assistance the “quality of life instrument” is best suitable for Rojava.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine: Israeli Collective Punishment Against Palestinians Constitutes a War Crime
    United Nations A/HRC/33/NGO/114 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 September 2016 English only Human Rights Council Thirty-third session Agenda item 7 Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories Joint written statement* submitted by the International Organization for the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (EAFORD), Arab Organization for Human Rights, Indian Movement "Tupaj Amaru", International- Lawyers.Org, Union of Arab Jurists, non-governmental organizations in special consultative status, International Educational Development, Inc., World Peace Council, non- governmental organizations on the roster The Secretary-General has received the following written statement which is circulated in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31. [01 September 2016] * This written statement is issued, unedited, in the language(s) received from the submitting non- governmental organization(s). GE.16-15675(E) A/HRC/33/NGO/114 Palestine: Israeli Collective Punishment against Palestinians Constitutes a War Crime Introduction: For decades, the occupied Palestinian people have suffered from grave human rights violations due to Israel’s oppressive and unjust practices. Among the unfair acts against the occupied population is the ongoing Israeli policy of collective punishment, through the demolitions of the family houses of those accused or suspected of carrying out attacks against Israelis. This practice results in the total devastation of completely innocent families, who have nothing to do with the alleged attacks. The latest such demolition took place in Hebron, West Bank, on 30th August 2016, raising serious concerns regarding this collective punishment policy against innocent civilians which is a war crime under the provisions of International Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Tulips and Crocuses Are Popular Food Snacks: Kurdish
    Pieroni et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2019) 15:59 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0341-0 RESEARCH Open Access Where tulips and crocuses are popular food snacks: Kurdish traditional foraging reveals traces of mobile pastoralism in Southern Iraqi Kurdistan Andrea Pieroni1* , Hawre Zahir2, Hawraz Ibrahim M. Amin3,4 and Renata Sõukand5 Abstract Background: Iraqi Kurdistan is a special hotspot for bio-cultural diversity and for investigating patterns of traditional wild food plant foraging, considering that this area was the home of the first Neolithic communities and has been, over millennia, a crossroad of different civilizations and cultures. The aim of this ethnobotanical field study was to cross-culturally compare the wild food plants traditionally gathered by Kurdish Muslims and those gathered by the ancient Kurdish Kakai (Yarsan) religious group and to possibly better understand the human ecology behind these practices. Methods: Twelve villages were visited and 123 study participants (55 Kakai and 68 Muslim Kurds) were interviewed on the specific topic of the wild food plants they currently gather and consume. Results: The culinary use of 54 folk wild plant taxa (corresponding to 65 botanical taxa) and two folk wild mushroom taxa were documented. While Kakais and Muslims do share a majority of the quoted food plants and also their uses, among the plant ingredients exclusively and commonly quoted by Muslims non-weedy plants are slightly preponderant. Moreover, more than half of the overall recorded wild food plants are used raw as snacks, i.e. plant parts are consumed on the spot after their gathering and only sometimes do they enter into the domestic arena.
    [Show full text]