Gravitational-Wave Constraints on GWTC-2 Events by Measuring Tidal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gravitational-Wave Constraints on GWTC-2 Events by Measuring Tidal 15:00-15:15, July 8 (Thu.), 2021 Gravitational-Wave Constraints on GWTC-2 Events by Measuring Tidal Deformability and Spin-Induced Quadrupole Moment Λ arXiv:2106.09193 δκ Tatsuya Narikawa (ICRR, The Univ. of Tokyo) Nami Uchikata (ICRR), Takahiro Tanaka (Kyoto Univ.) KIW8 1 Introduction spin-induced quadrupole moment Λ δκ Measuring tidal deformability Λ and SIQM δκ by GW → Tests of GR We report constraints on Λ for low-mass GWTC-2 events (long-inspiral regime): GW151226, GW170608, GW190707, GW190720, GW190728, GW190924 Related works - Tidal tests: Johnson-McDaniel+2018 (Constraints on Boson stars Λ by future BBH detections) - SIQM tests: ① Krishnendu+2019 (GW151226 & GW170608); δκ ② O3 TGR paper 2020 (GWTC-2 events) 2 Exotic compact objects (ECOs) ECO: Alternatives to BH in GR 1.3 NatureMotivation: of Dark Matter. Avoidance spacial singularity in BH, solution for 5 information loss problem of BH [GWIC-3G_science-case] neutron star fuzzball, gravastar, wormhole, 2-2 hole, collapsed polymer, quantum isotropic fluid star star/bounce/condensate, … black hole limit strongly anisotropic star boson star 1020 10 3 2 surface redshift Planck scale clean photosphere photosphere Buchdahl Compactness Figure 1.3: Schematic classification of dark compact objects. Compactness of ECOs is expressed as the gravitational ECO modify GWs and tidal deformability and SIQM is useful to test redshift at the surface: objects with a photon-sphere have z & 1.7, the Buchdhal’s limit corresponds to z = 3, the clean photon-spheredeviation condition from [86] requires BBH zin& GR7.9, Planck-scale(Λ=0 & δκ=0). corrections correspond to z & 1020, and a BH has infinite redshift. Objects in the same category have similar dynamical properties. Boxes refer to known ECO models and the case of anIf ordinary we find NS (deviationz 1) is reported from as aBBH, reference. which provides evidence for existence ⇡ of ECO and hint for new physics. 3 interact electromagnetically or any electromagnetic (EM) signal from the surface of the compact object might be highly redshifted [86]. Example GW signatures from the inspiral epoch include dipole radiation as well as the variety of matter effects as in the case of NSs [96] (see, Chapter 2). An ECO could be parameterized by the gravitational redshift zg near its surface (see Fig. 1.3). This parameter can change by several orders of magnitude depending on the model. BHs have z • while g ! NSs and the most compact theoretically constructed boson stars have z O(1). Thus, for sufficiently g ⇠ large values of zg compact objects could behave like BHs with increasing precision. Studies of geodesic motion and quasi-normal modes indicate that ECOs with zg . 1.4 display internal structure effects that can be discerned in future GW observations. For larger values of zg, ECOs mimic BHs [99, 86, 100] as departures are redshifted to ever smaller values. Interestingly, models of near-horizon quantum structures—motivated by various scenarios [75–77, 82]—can reach redshifts as high as z O(1020) for ECOs in the frequency band g ⇠ of ground-based detectors. GWs could be our only hope to detect or rule them out. Additionally, while the ringdown signal can be qualitatively similar to that of a BH, quasi-normal modes of, e.g., gravastars, axion stars and boson stars, are different from Kerr BHs [10]. 3G detectors will have unprecedented ability to extract such modes. In addition to gravitational modes, matter modes might be excited in the ringdown of an extremely compact object, akin to fluid modes excited in a remnant NS [96]. In the case of certain BH mimickers the prompt ringdown signal is identical to that of a BH; however, these objects generically support quasi-bound trapped modes which produce a modulated train of pulses at late time. These modes appear after a delay time whose characteristics are key to test Planckian corrections at the horizon scale that could be explored with 3G detectors [86]. 1.3 Nature of Dark Matter. The exquisite ability of 3G detectors to probe the population and dynamics of electromagnetically dark objects throughout the Universe and harness deep insights on gravity can help reveal the nature of dark matter and answer key questions about its origin. Black holes as dark matter candidates: LIGO and Virgo discoveries have revived interest in the possibility that dark matter could be composed, in part, of BHs of masses 0.1–100M [101–103]. Such BHs might ⇠ have been produced from the collapse of large primordial density fluctuations in the very early Universe or during inflation [104, 105]. The exact distribution of masses depends on the model of inflation, and might be further affected by processes in the early Universe such as the quantum-chromodynamic phase transition [106]. SYSTEMATIC AND STATISTICAL ERRORS IN A … PHYSICAL REVIEW D 89, 103012 (2014) decreases. The deformation of each body will have an effect The total mass is M m1 m2, where m1 and m2 are ¼ þ 2 on the rate at which the bodies coalesce. BNS systems the component masses, η m1m2=M is the symmetric SYSTEMATIC AND STATISTICAL ERRORS IN A … ¼ 3 2=3 PHYSICAL REVIEW D 89, 103012 (2014) therefore depart from the point-particle approximation at mass ratio, x πGMfgw=c is the PN expansion high frequencies and require an additional correction to the ¼ð Þ decreases. The deformationparameter, of each bodyf willgw have2f anorb effectis the GWThe frequency, total massf isorbMis them1 m2, where m1 and m2 are energy and luminosity of the system relativeon the rate to the at which point- the bodies coalesce.¼ BNS systems the component masses,¼η mþ m =M2 is the symmetric binary’s orbital frequency, and χ1 m1=M and χ2 1 2 therefore depart from the point-particle approximation at ¼ ¼ 3 2=3 particle terms. m =M are the two mass fractions.mass Note ratio, thatx theπ PNGMf ordergw=c is the PN expansion high frequencies and require an2 additional correction to the ¼ð Þ Since a NS in a binary system will deform under the tidal is labeled by the exponent on x insideparameter, the squarefgw 2 brackets,forb is the GW frequency, forb is the energy and luminosity of the system relative to the point- ¼ influence of its companion, its quadrupole moment Qij which is why these terms are referredbinary’s to orbital as 5PN frequency, and 6PN and χ1 m1=M and χ2 particle terms. ¼ ¼ must be related to the tidal field E caused by its m2=M are the two mass fractions. Note that the PN order ijSince a NS in a binary systemcorrections. will deform Since under the the tidal 5PN and 6PN tidal correction companion. For a single NS, to leading order in the 5 6 is labeled by the exponent on x inside the square brackets, influence of its companion,coefficients its quadrupole multiply momentx andQ x , respectively, these effects quasistationary approximation and ignoring resonance, ij which is why these terms are referred to as 5PN and 6PN must be related to the tidalwill be field insignificantEij caused at by low its frequenciescorrections. and Since increasingly the 5PN and 6PN tidal correction 2=3 companion. For a singlemore NS, to significant leading order at higher in the frequenciescoefficients (x ∼ f multiply), asx antici-5 and x6, respectively, these effects Qij −λEij; (1) orb ¼ quasistationary approximationpated. and The ignoring Appendix resonance, derives eachwill be tidally insignificant corrected at low PN frequencies and increasingly 5 2=3 where λ 2=3 k2R =G parametrizes the amount that a Q waveform−λE ; family from Eqs.(1) (2)moreand (3) significant. at higher frequencies (x ∼ forb ), as antici- ¼ð Þ ij ¼ ij NS deforms [10]. The i and j are spatial tensor indices, k2 is The point-particle energy and luminositypated. The are Appendix only known derives each tidally corrected PN 5 the second Love number, and R is thewhere NS’s radius.λ 2= Since3 k2Rλ=G parametrizesto 3.5 PN order the amount[14]. However, that a wewaveform add tidal family corrections from Eqs. to(2) and (3). ¼ð Þ parametrizes the severity of a NS’s deformationNS deforms [10] under. The ai andthej are energy spatial tensor and luminosity indices, k2 is that appearThe point-particle at 5 PN and energy 6 PN and luminosity are only known given tidal field, it must depend on thethe NS second EOS. Love NSs number, with andordersR is the without NS’s radius. knowing Since theλ higher-orderto 3.5 PN order point-particle[14]. However, we add tidal corrections to parametrizes the severity ofterms. a NS The’s deformation justification under for a includingthe energy the tidal and luminosity corrections that appear at 5 PN and 6 PN large radii will more easily be deformed by the external orders without knowing the higher-order point-particle given tidal field, it must dependhas typically on the NS been EOS. that NSs they with are always associated with the tidal field, because there will be a morelarge extreme radii will gravita- more easily be deformed by the external terms. The justification for including the tidal corrections tional gradient over their radius. For a fixed mass, NSs with large coefficient Gλ c2= Gm 5 ∼ c2R = Gm 5 ∼ 105 tidal field, because there will be a more extremeA½ gravita-ð AÞhas typically½ A ð beenA thatÞ they are always associated with the large radii are also referred to as havingtional a stiff gradient EOS, over and, their radius.[10]. For Therefore, a fixed mass, although NSs with they appearlarge at coefficient high PNG orders,λ c2= theGm 5 ∼ c2R = Gm 5 ∼ 105 A½ ð AÞ ½ A ð AÞ for the same mass, NSs with small radiilarge have radii a are soft also EOS.
Recommended publications
  • Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves
    Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Ue-Li Pen, Lindsay King, Latham Boyle CITA Feb 15, 2012 U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Overview I Pulsar Scattering I VLBI ISM holography, distance measures I Enhanced Pulsar Timing Array gravity waves I fuzzballs U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Pulsar Scattering I Pulsars scintillate strongly due to ISM propagation I Lens of geometric size ∼ AU I Can be imaged with VLBI (Brisken et al 2010) I Deconvolved by interstellar holography (Walker et al 2008) U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Scattering Image Data from Brisken et al, Holographic VLBI. U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary ISM enigma −8 I Scattering angle observed mas, 10 rad. I Snell's law: sin(θ1)= sin(θ2) = n2=n1 −12 I n − 1 ∼ 10 . I 4 orders of magnitude mismatch. U. Pen Pulsar Scattering, Lensing and Gravity Waves Introduction Convergent Plasma Lenses Gravity Waves Black Holes/Fuzzballs Summary Possibilities I turbulent ISM: sum of many small scatters. Cannot explain discrete images. I confinement problem: super mini dark matter halos, cosmic strings? I Geometric alignment: Goldreich and Shridhar (2006) I Snell's law at grazing incidence: ∆α = (1 − n2=n1)/α I grazing incidence is geometry preferred at 2-D structures U.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptual Model for the Origin of the Cutoff Parameter in Exotic Compact Objects
    S S symmetry Article A Conceptual Model for the Origin of the Cutoff Parameter in Exotic Compact Objects Wilson Alexander Rojas Castillo 1 and Jose Robel Arenas Salazar 2,* 1 Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá UN.11001, Colombia; [email protected] 2 Observatorio Astronómico Nacional, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá UN.11001, Colombia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 30 November 2020 ; Published: 14 December 2020 Abstract: A Black Hole (BH) is a spacetime region with a horizon and where geodesics converge to a singularity. At such a point, the gravitational field equations fail. As an alternative to the problem of the singularity arises the existence of Exotic Compact Objects (ECOs) that prevent the problem of the singularity through a transition phase of matter once it has crossed the horizon. ECOs are characterized by a closeness parameter or cutoff, e, which measures the degree of compactness of the object. This parameter is established as the difference between the radius of the ECO’s surface and the gravitational radius. Thus, different values of e correspond to different types of ECOs. If e is very big, the ECO behaves more like a star than a black hole. On the contrary, if e tends to a very small value, the ECO behaves like a black hole. It is considered a conceptual model of the origin of the cutoff for ECOs, when a dust shell contracts gravitationally from an initial position to near the Schwarzschild radius. This allowed us to find that the cutoff makes two types of contributions: a classical one governed by General Relativity and one of a quantum nature, if the ECO is very close to the horizon, when estimating that the maximum entropy is contained within the material that composes the shell.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous Gravitational Waves from Neutron Stars: Current Status and Prospects
    Continuous gravitational waves from neutron stars: current status and prospects Magdalena Sieniawska∗1 and Michał Bejger1 1Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bartycka 18, 00–716 Warszawa, Poland Abstract Gravitational waves astronomy allows us to study objects and events invisi- ble in electromagnetic waves. It is crucial to validate the theories and models of the most mysterious and extreme matter in the Universe: the neutron stars. In addition to inspirals and mergers of neutrons stars, there are currently a few pro- posed mechanisms that can trigger radiation of long-lasting gravitational radiation from neutron stars, such as e.g., elastically and/or magnetically driven deforma- tions: mountains on the stellar surface supported by the elastic strain or magnetic field, free precession, or unstable oscillation modes (e.g., the r-modes). The as- trophysical motivation for continuous gravitational waves searches, current LIGO and Virgo strategies of data analysis and prospects are reviewed in this work. 1 Introduction Gravitational-wave (GW) astronomy has been one of the fastest-growing fields in astro- physics since the first historical detection of a binary black-hole (BH) system GW150814 (Abbott et al., 2016a). In addition to studying the nature of gravitation itself, it may be used to infer information about the astrophysical sources emitting the GWs. This re- view concentrates on a specific kind of prospective GWs: persistent (continuous) grav- itational waves (CGWs), emitted by neutron stars (NSs). The article is arranged as follows. Section1 gathers introductory material: Section 1.1 presents the basics of the GWs theory, Section 1.2 contains a brief overview of GWs detections, Section 1.3 de- arXiv:1909.12600v2 [astro-ph.HE] 5 Nov 2019 scribes properties of NSs and features of hitherto detected NSs-related GWs—a binary NS merger GW170817 (Abbott et al., 2017d), Section 1.4 gathers general information about CGWs, whereas Section 1.5 is devoted to the main data analysis methods used in CGWs searches.
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Electron-Antineutrinos Associated with Gravitational-Wave Events GW150914, GW151012, GW151226, GW170104, GW170608, GW170814, and GW170817 at Daya Bay*
    Chinese Physics C Vol. 45, No. 5 (2021) 055001 Editors′ Suggestion Search for electron-antineutrinos associated with gravitational-wave events GW150914, GW151012, GW151226, GW170104, GW170608, GW170814, and GW170817 at Daya Bay* F. P. An1 A. B. Balantekin2 H. R. Band3 M. Bishai4 S. Blyth5 G. F. Cao6 J. Cao6 J. F. Chang6 Y. Chang7 H. S. Chen6 S. M. Chen8 Y. Chen9,10 Y. X. Chen11 J. Cheng6 Z. K. Cheng10 J. J. Cherwinka2 M. C. Chu12 J. P. Cummings13 O. Dalager14 F. S. Deng15 Y. Y. Ding6 M. V. Diwan4 T. Dohnal16 J. Dove17 M. Dvořák16 D. A. Dwyer18 J. P. Gallo19 M. Gonchar20 G. H. Gong8 H. Gong8 W. Q. Gu4 J. Y. Guo10 L. Guo8 X. H. Guo21 Y. H. Guo22 Z. Guo8 R. W. Hackenburg4 S. Hans4,* M. He6 K. M. Heeger3 Y. K. Heng6 A. Higuera23 Y. K. Hor10 Y. B. Hsiung5 B. Z. Hu5 J. R. Hu6 T. Hu6 Z. J. Hu10 H. X. Huang24 X. T. Huang25 Y. B. Huang26 P. Huber27 D. E. Jaffe4 K. L. Jen28 X. L. Ji6 X. P. Ji4 R. A. Johnson29 D. Jones30 L. Kang31 S. H. Kettell4 S. Kohn32 M. Kramer18,32 T. J. Langford3 J. Lee18 J. H. C. Lee33 R. T. Lei31 R. Leitner16 J. K. C. Leung33 F. Li6 J. J. Li8 Q. J. Li6 S. Li31 S. C. Li27 W. D. Li6 X. N. Li6 X. Q. Li34 Y. F. Li6 Z. B. Li10 H. Liang15 C. J. Lin18 G. L. Lin28 S. Lin31 J. J. Ling10 J. M. Link27 L. Littenberg4 B.
    [Show full text]
  • GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M Black Hole 4 with a 2.6 M Compact Object
    1 Draft version May 21, 2020 2 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 3 GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M Black Hole 4 with a 2.6 M Compact Object 5 LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration 6 7 (Dated: May 21, 2020) 8 ABSTRACT 9 We report the observation of a compact binary coalescence involving a 22.2 { 24.3 M black hole and 10 a compact object with a mass of 2.50 { 2.67 M (all measurements quoted at the 90% credible level). 11 The gravitational-wave signal, GW190814, was observed during LIGO's and Virgo's third observing 12 run on August 14, 2019 at 21:10:39 UTC and has a signal-to-noise ratio of 25 in the three-detector 2 +41 13 network. The source was localized to 18.5 deg at a distance of 241−45 Mpc; no electromagnetic 14 counterpart has been confirmed to date. The source has the most unequal mass ratio yet measured +0:008 15 with gravitational waves, 0:112−0:009, and its secondary component is either the lightest black hole 16 or the heaviest neutron star ever discovered in a double compact-object system. The dimensionless 17 spin of the primary black hole is tightly constrained to 0:07. Tests of general relativity reveal no ≤ 18 measurable deviations from the theory, and its prediction of higher-multipole emission is confirmed at −3 −1 19 high confidence. We estimate a merger rate density of 1{23 Gpc yr for the new class of binary 20 coalescence sources that GW190814 represents.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2009.06555V3 [Astro-Ph.CO] 1 Feb 2021
    KCL-PH-TH/2020-53, CERN-TH-2020-150 Cosmic String Interpretation of NANOGrav Pulsar Timing Data John Ellis,1, 2, 3, ∗ and Marek Lewicki1, 4, y 1Kings College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom 2Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 3National Institute of Chemical Physics & Biophysics, R¨avala10, 10143 Tallinn, Estonia 4Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw ul. Pasteura 5, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland Pulsar timing data used to provide upper limits on a possible stochastic gravitational wave back- ground (SGWB). However, the NANOGrav Collaboration has recently reported strong evidence for a stochastic common-spectrum process, which we interpret as a SGWB in the framework of cosmic strings. The possible NANOGrav signal would correspond to a string tension Gµ 2 (4×10−11; 10−10) at the 68% confidence level, with a different frequency dependence from supermassive black hole mergers. The SGWB produced by cosmic strings with such values of Gµ would be beyond the reach of LIGO, but could be measured by other planned and proposed detectors such as SKA, LISA, TianQin, AION-1km, AEDGE, Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer. Introduction: Stimulated by the direct discovery of for cosmic string models, discussing how experiments gravitational waves (GWs) by the LIGO and Virgo Col- could confirm or disprove such an interpretation. Upper laborations [1{8] of black holes and neutron stars at fre- limits on the SGWB are often quoted assuming a spec- 2=3 quencies f & 10 Hz, there is widespread interest in ex- trum described by a GW abundance proportional to f , periments exploring other parts of the GW spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Learning Ensemble for Real-Time Gravitational Wave Detection of Spinning Binary Black Hole Mergers ∗ Wei Wei A,B,C, , Asad Khan A,B,C, E.A
    Physics Letters B 812 (2021) 136029 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Deep learning ensemble for real-time gravitational wave detection of spinning binary black hole mergers ∗ Wei Wei a,b,c, , Asad Khan a,b,c, E.A. Huerta a,b,c,d,e, Xiaobo Huang a,b,f, Minyang Tian a,b,c a National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA b NCSA Center for Artificial Intelligence Innovation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA c Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA d Illinois Center for Advanced Studies of the Universe, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA e Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA f Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: We introduce the use of deep learning ensembles for real-time, gravitational wave detection of Received 29 October 2020 spinning binary black hole mergers. This analysis consists of training independent neural networks Accepted 10 December 2020 that simultaneously process strain data from multiple detectors. The output of these networks is then Available online 15 December 2020 combined and processed to identify significant noise triggers. We have applied this methodology in Editor: G.F. Giudice O2 and O3 data finding that deep learning ensembles clearly identify binary black hole mergers in open source data available at the Gravitational-Wave Open Science Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds
    Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds Nelson Christensen1;2 z 1ARTEMIS, Universit´eC^oted'Azur, Observatoire C^oted'Azur, CNRS, 06304 Nice, France 2Physics and Astronomy, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057, USA Abstract. A stochastic background of gravitational waves can be created by the superposition of a large number of independent sources. The physical processes occurring at the earliest moments of the universe certainly created a stochastic background that exists, at some level, today. This is analogous to the cosmic microwave background, which is an electromagnetic record of the early universe. The recent observations of gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors imply that there is also a stochastic background that has been created by binary black hole and binary neutron star mergers over the history of the universe. Whether the stochastic background is observed directly, or upper limits placed on it in specific frequency bands, important astrophysical and cosmological statements about it can be made. This review will summarize the current state of research of the stochastic background, from the sources of these gravitational waves, to the current methods used to observe them. Keywords: stochastic gravitational wave background, cosmology, gravitational waves 1. Introduction Gravitational waves are a prediction of Albert Einstein from 1916 [1,2], a consequence of general relativity [3]. Just as an accelerated electric charge will create electromagnetic waves (light), accelerating mass will create gravitational waves. And almost exactly arXiv:1811.08797v1 [gr-qc] 21 Nov 2018 a century after their prediction, gravitational waves were directly observed [4] for the first time by Advanced LIGO [5, 6].
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview of Research Areas in the OSU Physics Department
    A brief overview of research areas in the OSU Physics Department Physics Research Areas • Astrophysics & Cosmology • Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics • Biophysics • Cold Atom Physics (theory) • Condensed Matter Physics • High Energy Physics • Nuclear Physics • Physics Education Research (A Scientific Approach to Physics Education) Biophysics faculty Michael Poirier - Dongping Zhong - Ralf Bundschuh -Theory Experiment Experiment C. Jayaprakash - Theory Comert Kural (Biophysics since 2001) Experiment Biophysics Research Main theme: Molecular Mechanisms Behind Important Biological Functions Research areas: •chromosome structure and function •DNA repair •processing of genetic information •genetic regulatory networks •ultrafast protein dynamics •interaction of water with proteins •RNA structure and function Experimental Condensed Matter Physics Rolando Valdes Aguilar THz spectroscopy of quantum materials P. Chris Hammel Nanomagnetism and spin-electronics, high spatial resolution and high sensitivity scanned Roland Kawakami probe magnetic resonance imaging Spin-Based Electronics and Nanoscale Magnetism Leonard Brillson Semiconductor surfaces and interfaces, complex oxides, next generation electronics, high permittivity dielectrics, solar cells, biological Fengyuan Yang sensors Magnetism and magnetotransport in complex oxide epitaxial films; metallic multilayers; spin Jon Pelz dynamics/ transport in semiconductor nanowires Spatial and energy-resolved studies of contacts, deep-level defects, films and buried interfaces in oxides and semiconductors; spin injection Ezekiel Johnston-Halperin into semiconductors. Nanoscience, magnetism, spintronics, molecular/ organic electronics, complex oxides. Studies of Thomas Lemberger matter at nanoscopic length scales Magnetic and electronic properties of high temperature superconductors and other Jay Gupta oxides; thin film growth by coevaporation and LT UHV STM combined with optical probes; studies sputtering; single crystal growth. of interactions of atoms and molecules on surfaces structures built with atomic precision R.
    [Show full text]
  • Can We Observe Fuzzballs Or Firewalls?
    Can we observe fuzzballs or firewalls? Bin Guo1, Shaun Hampton2 and Samir D. Mathur3 Department of Physics The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210, USA Abstract In the fuzzball paradigm the information paradox is resolved because the black hole is replaced by an object with no horizon. One may therefore ask if observations can distinguish a traditional hole from a fuzzball. We find: (a) It is very difficult to reflect quanta off the surface of a fuzzball, mainly because geodesics starting near the horizon radius cannot escape to infinity unless their starting direction is very close to radial. (b) If infalling particles interact with the emerging radiation before they are engulfed by the horizon, then we say that we have a ‘firewall behavior’. We consider several types of interactions, but find no evidence for firewall behavior in any theory that obeys causality. (c) Photons with wavelengths larger than the black hole radius can be scattered off the emerging radiation, but a very small fraction of the backscattered photons will be able to escape back to infinity. arXiv:1711.01617v1 [hep-th] 5 Nov 2017 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1 Introduction In the traditional picture of a black hole, all the mass resides at a central singularity, while the rest of spacetime is empty. In particular, the region around the horizon is in a vacuum state. But such a picture of the hole leads to the black hole information paradox [1]. In string theory, it appears that this paradox is avoided because the structure of the hole is radically different: the hole is described by a horizon sized fuzzball, with no horizon [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • The Magic Fermion Repelling Stringy Fuzzball Black Hole, the Origin of a Cyclic Raspberry Multiverse
    The Magic Fermion Repelling Stringy Fuzzball Black Hole, the origin of a Cyclic Raspberry Multiverse. Leo Vuyk, Architect, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Abstract, This consciousness theory of everything, also called Quantum FFF Theory, (FFF = Function Follows Form) is a semi classical theory based on a symmetrical Big Bang into 8 or 12 Charge Parity (CP) symmetric copy universes. However such a cyclic multiverse seems to be only possible with special ingredients, 1: a propeller shaped fermion able transform by collision and spin in two pitch directions. 2: A compact String knot based dark matter Fuzzball black hole with enough rigid string content, to become stable against the fierce oscillations of the oscillating vacuum lattice and repelling all spinning Fermions. but not other black hole nuclei or photons. As a result, The Quantum FFF Theory is a semi classical theory because it describes reality by the real collision and shape transformation processes of real sub quantum rigid stringy multiverse entangled particles. Each particle is supposed to be conscious by its entanglement with 8 or 12 CP symmetric copy particles located inside 8 or 12 Charge Parity (CP) symmetric universal bubbles at long distance in raspberry shape. Those particles are supposed to be based on only one original transformable ring shaped massless virgin particle called the Axion/Higgs particle assumed to be the product of the symmetric cyclic big bang nucleus as the creation of one symmetrical raspberry shaped multiverse equipped with an even number of material and anti material universal bubbles. The Quantum FFF theory is called Semi classical because in addition to the ring shaped transformable rigid string particles, all universal bubbles are assumed to be each others Charge Parity (CP) mirror symmetric universal bubbles which are assumed to be instant entangled down to each individual string particle created out of the Axion Higgs splitting cold Big Bang.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(HEASA2018)029 ∗ [email protected] [email protected] Speaker
    Polarization of Gravitational Waves from Binary Systems PoS(HEASA2018)029 L. Nyadzani∗ Centre for Astro-Particle Physics (CAPP) and Department of Physics, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] S. Razzaque Centre for Astro-Particle Physics (CAPP) and Department of Physics, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] Gravitational waves (GWs) are one of the key predictions of Einstein’s theory of general relativity (GR). Scientists have been looking for evidence of GWs since their prediction by Einstein in 1916. The first direct detection was achieved by LIGO in 2015, 100 years after their prediction, from merging of two black holes in a binary into one. According to GR gravitational waves have two independent polarization states. In this paper, we study the power radiated and the strain of GW along the two polarization states from a compact binary system with its general orbital properties. High Energy Astrophysics in Southern Africa - HEASA2018 1-3 August, 2018 Parys, Free State, South Africa ∗Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). http://pos.sissa.it/ GW Polarizations L. Nyadzani 1. Introduction Gravitational waves are one of the key predictions of Einstein’s theory of general relativity (hereafter GR) [1, 2]. In GR, accelerated massive bodies generate ripples in spacetime. These rip- ples radiate away from their source at the speed of light [3]. The same way the electromagnetic radiation carry information about their origin, GWs also carry information about their origin.
    [Show full text]