DOCSLIB.ORG

A Chronological Investigation of the Middle Kingdom Tombs at Meir

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Chronological Investigation of the Middle Kingdom Tombs at Meir A CHRONOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE MIDDLE KINGDOM TOMBS AT MEIR Steven Darlow B.App.Sc., University of Technology Sydney M.Comp., M.A., Macquarie University A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Ancient History Faculty of Arts Macquarie University 2017 Front Cover Image: Tomb C1 (Ukhhotep III), Meir. Top Register, North wall of Statue Recess. (from author’s photograph, 2011 site visit) For Aidan and Ciara DECLARATION I certify that the work in this thesis titled: “A Chronological Investigation of the Middle Kingdom Tombs at Meir”, has not previously been submitted for a degree, nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree to any other university or institution. I also certify that the thesis is an original piece of research. Any help and assistance that I have received in my research work and the preparation of the thesis itself have been appropriately acknowledged. All sources of information and literature utilised in the writing this work have been acknowledged and referenced where appropriate. No ethics approval was required for this dissertation. Dated this 20th day of December 2017 Steven Darlow Student ID: 89023315 ii ABSTRACT In the early to mid- Twelfth Dynasty, the provincial governors of the region downstream of Asyut developed a strong local culture, maintaining a degree of independence from the royal court that lasted until the reign of Senusret III. Located geographically in the middle of this group of four provinces is the fourteenth Upper Egyptian Nome, with the tombs of its governors situated in the necropolis of Meir. While the Meir tombs, along with the contemporary tombs of the other three provincial centres of Beni Hasan, Bersheh and Asyut have been the subjects of extensive prior study, aspects of the modes of artistic transmission between these provinces (and possible driving influences, including external factors) have not been fully addressed. This thesis is arranged as a comparative chronological investigation, with the governors’ tombs at Meir as the primary focus, and the tombs of the governors of the neighbouring provinces making up the comparison sites. Contemporaneous tombs from other provincial sites and the royal courts of Western Thebes and Lisht are also included, for assessment of influences on Meir from these sources, as well as sources from earlier periods in Egyptian history (including Old Kingdom influences from Meir and the Memphite court and First Intermediate period / Eleventh Dynasty influences from various sites). The chronological framework of the study is established from textual sources in chapter three, primarily relying on fixed dating via regnal references and relative dating via genealogical references. Other attributes of the tomb texts are investigated for their chronological dimension, confirming that changes in the phrases of the hetep-di-nesu formula established in prior studies are observed in the tombs of the study, and that epithets and titles of the tomb owner (with the exception of the title ‘Great Overlord of the N Nome’) are less variable from a chronological perspective. Chapter four compares the architectural features of the Meir tombs with those of the comparison sites, with the finding that architectural styles are largely driven by local influences, but some common elements are identified which emphasise a longitudinal axis of orientation towards a cult focus (shrine) on the rear wall. Part two of chapter four compares the governors’ tombs at Meir with the burials of their direct subordinates (extended family and officials) by textual comparisons with the coffins from the lesser burials. Three distinct clusters of coffins are identified, with the names of the owners of the later group suggesting probable intermixing of individuals from this social class with their contemporaries from Beni Hasan (possibly via intermarriage and associated migration). Chapter five compares the artistic styles and techniques observed in the Meir tombs with those of the comparison sites, noting that canonical techniques are universally applied, but are subject to local conventions and varying artistic capabilities. Case studies outline selected stylistic and compositional features of Meir tomb B2, highlighting the significant achievements of that particular artist in advancing the iii Meir artistic style from Eleventh and early Twelfth Dynasty royal styles, as well as the development of the artists’ grids through the Twelfth Dynasty as observed in tombs B2 and C1 (taking advantage of the unique existence at Meir of two chronologically separate tombs attesting surviving grids). The iconography of the desert hunt and the tomb owner fishing and fowling is examined in Chapter six. Influences on the depiction of these themes at Meir are traced from royal and elite examples from the Fifth and Sixth Dynasty Memphite cemeteries, via the Sixth Dynasty tombs at Meir. Alignment of key attributes of these scenes are noted between Meir and all of the comparison sites towards the mid Twelfth Dynasty. The data from the above analyses are synthesised in chapter seven, which illustrates points at which the paternal line of succession is interrupted at Beni Hasan and Meir, and similarities in how royal legitimacy was invoked at both sites to support the new incumbent. Routes of artistic transmission to and from Meir are presented for the iconographic themes of the desert hunt and the tomb owner fishing and fowling, demonstrating a tendency towards horizontal transmission processes which correlate with the evidence of intermarriage and migration between nomes during the Twelfth Dynasty, particularly noting evidence of this between Beni Hasan and Meir. Changes in technique can also be aligned chronologically with evidence of intermarriage and migration between nomes, particularly the change in technique in Meir tomb C1 from cut relief to purely painted representation (following the long-standing technique of artistic execution at Beni Hasan). iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my principal supervisor, Professor Naguib Kanawati for his infinite patience and encouragement over the eight years of my candidature. Without his guidance and ongoing support this thesis would not have been possible. I would like to thank my associate supervisor Dr Alexandra Woods for her advice in framing my research at the outset and her valuable feedback on my early work on the thesis. Her expertise in the iconography of the tomb owner fishing and fowling was also invaluable in guiding my research in this aspect of the study. I am indebted to the Department of Ancient History, Faculty of Arts, Macquarie University for giving me the opportunity to join Prof Kanawati, Dr Woods and the team on field work at Meir and Beni Hasan, where I was able to collect data directly from the tombs which form a central part of this work. I would like to thank my family for all the support over the years I have spent undertaking this task. Without their encouragement I would not have been able to finish it. Special thanks must go to my wife Monica, for carrying out the onerous task of proof-reading the final draft. I also acknowledge the life-long passion of my father in ancient worlds and peoples, and who passed this enduring interest on to me. To him I owe everything for my starting down this path in the first place. v LIST OF TABLES Table 4.1 Architectural Features of the Governors’ Tombs 113 Table 4.2 Seriation of Architectural Features of the Governors’ 117 Tombs Table 4.3 Seriation of Textual Attributes of the Meir Governors’ 127 Tombs and Coffins from Associated Shaft Tombs. Table 6.1 Seriation of the Desert Hunt scene (a) constrained 220 (b) unconstrained Table 6.2 Seriation of the Tomb Owner Fishing and Fowling scene 236 (a) constrained (b) unconstrained vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Sketch Map of the Meir Necropolis (northern part) 18 Figure 4.1 Elevated Porch fronting Statue Recess – Tomb B4 (Ukhhotep II) 140 Figure 4.2 Elevated statue recess – Tomb C1 (Ukhhotep III) 140 Figure 4.3 Probable portico remnant – Tomb C1 (Ukhhotep III) 141 Figure 4.4 Typical Plain Fronted Eleventh Dynasty Tomb Exterior, 141 Beni Hasan Figure 4.5 Portico of tomb BH2 at Beni Hasan (Nomarch Amenemhat) 142 Figure 4.6 Approach to statue recess – tomb BH2 (Nomarch 142 Amenemhat) Figure 4.7 Coffin of Overseer of Sealbearers Ukhhotep (M1NY) 143 MMA 12.182.132a. Figure 4.8 Shaft tomb on terrace above and behind governor’s 143 tomb B1 (Senbi I) at Meir. Figure 5.1 Wing Detail from Pintail Duck – Tomb B1 (Senbi I) 206 Figure 5.2 Procession of Cattle – Tomb B1 (Senbi I) 206 Figure 5.3 Procession of Cattle - Tomb B2 (Ukhhotep I) 207 Figure 5.4 Beja Leading Cattle – Tomb B2 (Ukhhotep I) 207 Figure 5.5 Leading Cattle – Tomb B2 (Ukhhotep I) 208 Figure 5.6 Tomb Owner Seated – Tomb B2 (Ukhhotep I) 208 Figure 5.7a Tomb Owner seated, with (presumed) wife at feet, Tomb 209 B2 (Ukhhotep I) Figure 5.7b Detail of (presumed) wife, Tomb B2 (Ukhhotep I) 209 Figure 5.8a Divergence from Canon – Facial Features: Blind 209 Musician, Tomb B2 (Ukhhotep I) Figure 5.8b Divergence from Canon – Facial Features: Beja 209 Herdsman, Tomb B2 (Ukhhotep I) Figure 5.9 Transmission of Expression in animal figures – Tomb B2 210 (Ukhhotep I) vii Figure 5.10 Divergence from Canon in Posture of minor figure – 210 Tomb B1 (Senbi I) Figure 5.11 Bringing Down a Bull (Detail)– Tomb B2 (Ukhhotep I) 211 Figure 5.12 Duelling Boatmen (Detail) – Tomb B2 (Ukhhotep I) 211 Figure 5.13 Painted Representation of tomb
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Functions and Uses of Egyptian Myth Fonctions Et Usages Du Mythe Égyptien
    Revue de l’histoire des religions 4 | 2018 Qu’est-ce qu’un mythe égyptien ? Functions and Uses of Egyptian Myth Fonctions et usages du mythe égyptien Katja Goebs and John Baines Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rhr/9334 DOI: 10.4000/rhr.9334 ISSN: 2105-2573 Publisher Armand Colin Printed version Date of publication: 1 December 2018 Number of pages: 645-681 ISBN: 978-2-200-93200-8 ISSN: 0035-1423 Electronic reference Katja Goebs and John Baines, “Functions and Uses of Egyptian Myth”, Revue de l’histoire des religions [Online], 4 | 2018, Online since 01 December 2020, connection on 13 January 2021. URL: http:// journals.openedition.org/rhr/9334 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rhr.9334 Tous droits réservés KATJA GOEBS / JOHN BAINES University of Toronto / University of Oxford Functions and Uses of Egyptian Myth* This article discusses functions and uses of myth in ancient Egypt as a contribution to comparative research. Applications of myth are reviewed in order to present a basic general typology of usages: from political, scholarly, ritual, and medical applications, through incorporation in images, to linguistic and literary exploitations. In its range of function and use, Egyptian myth is similar to that of other civilizations, except that written narratives appear to have developed relatively late. The many attested forms and uses underscore its flexibility, which has entailed many interpretations starting with assessments of the Osiris myth reported by Plutarch (2nd century AD). Myths conceptualize, describe, explain, and control the world, and they were adapted to an ever-changing reality. Fonctions et usages du mythe égyptien Cet article discute les fonctions et les usages du mythe en Égypte ancienne dans une perspective comparatiste et passe en revue ses applications, afin de proposer une typologie générale de ses usages – applications politiques, érudites, rituelles et médicales, incorporation dans des images, exploitation linguistique et littéraire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of Yahweh and El: a Study of Two Cults and Their Related Mythology
    Wyatt, Nicolas (1976) The relationship of Yahweh and El: a study of two cults and their related mythology. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2160/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] .. ýýý,. The relationship of Yahweh and Ell. a study of two cults and their related mythology. Nicolas Wyatt ý; ý. A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy rin the " ®artänont of Ssbrwr and Semitic languages in the University of Glasgow. October 1976. ý ý . u.: ý. _, ý 1 I 'Preface .. tee.. This thesis is the result of work done in the Department of Hebrew and ': eraitia Langusgee, under the supervision of Professor John rdacdonald, during the period 1970-1976. No and part of It was done in collaboration, the views expressed are entirely my own. r. .e I should like to express my thanks to the followings Professor John Macdonald, for his assistance and encouragement; Dr. John Frye of the Univeritty`of the"Witwatersrandy who read parts of the thesis and offered comments and criticism; in and to my wife, whose task was hardest of all, that she typed the thesis, coping with the peculiarities of both my style and my handwriting.
    [Show full text]
  • In Ancient Egypt
    THE ROLE OF THE CHANTRESS ($MW IN ANCIENT EGYPT SUZANNE LYNN ONSTINE A thesis submined in confonnity with the requirements for the degm of Ph.D. Graduate Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civiliations University of Toronto %) Copyright by Suzanne Lynn Onstine (200 1) . ~bsPdhorbasgmadr~ exclusive liceacc aiiowhg the ' Nationai hiof hada to reproduce, loan, distnia sdl copies of this thesis in miaof#m, pspa or elccmnic f-. L'atm criucrve la propri&C du droit d'autear qui protcge cette thtse. Ni la thèse Y des extraits substrrntiets deceMne&iveatetreimprimCs ouraitnmcrtrepoduitssanssoai aut&ntiom The Role of the Chmaes (fm~in Ancient Emt A doctorai dissertacion by Suzanne Lynn On*, submitted to the Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations, University of Toronto, 200 1. The specitic nanire of the tiUe Wytor "cimûes", which occurrPd fcom the Middle Kingdom onwatd is imsiigated thrwgh the use of a dalabase cataloging 861 woinen whheld the title. Sorting the &ta based on a variety of delails has yielded pattern regatding their cbnological and demographical distribution. The changes in rhe social status and numbers of wbmen wbo bore the Weindicale that the Egyptians perceivecl the role and ams of the titk âiffefcntiy thugh tirne. Infomiation an the tities of ihe chantressw' family memkrs bas ailowed the author to make iderences cawming llse social status of the mmen who heu the title "chanms". MiMid Kingdom tifle-holders wverc of modest backgrounds and were quite rare. Eighteenth DMasty women were of the highest ranking families. The number of wamen who held the titk was also comparatively smaii, Nimeenth Dynasty women came [rom more modesi backgrounds and were more nwnennis.
    [Show full text]
  • Hatshepsut: Pharaoh of Egypt
    in fact a woman. Hatshepsut was the sixth pharaoh of ancient Egypt’s eighteenth dynasty, during the time called the New Kingdom period. Ancient Egypt’s New Kingdom lasted from 1570 until 1069 B.C.E. Some Hatshepsut: Pharaoh of the best-known pharaohs ruled during this time, including Thutmose, of Egypt Amenhotep, Akhenaten, and Tutankha- mun. However, the name Hatshepsut Although the pyramids of ancient remained largely unknown for thou- Egypt have existed for thousands of sands of years. years, the study of ancient Egypt, called Hatshepsut ruled Egypt from 1473 Egyptology, began in earnest in the until 1458 B.C.E. While she is not the early 1800s. At this time, people had fi- only woman to have ever served as pha- nally learned how to read hieroglyphics, raoh, no woman ruled longer. Today, the ancient Egyptian system of pictorial most historians agree that Hatshepsut writing. Once scholars could read hi- was the most powerful and successful eroglyphics, they were able to increase female pharaoh. their knowledge of ancient Egyptian cul- Historians are unsure of Hatshepsut’s ture and history. actual birthdate. They do know that she In 1822, when reading the text in- was the oldest of two daughters born to scribed on an ancient monument, Egyp- the Egyptian king Thutmose I and to his tologists encountered a puzzling figure. queen, Ahmes. Thutmose I was a charis- This person was a pharaoh of Egypt. matic ruler and a powerful military lead- Like other Egyptian rulers, this pha- er. Hatshepsut was married to her half raoh was depicted, or shown, wearing brother, Thutmose II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Season's Work at Ahnas and Beni Hasan : 1890-1891
    NYU IFA LIBRARY 3 1162 04538879 1 The Stephen Chan Library of Fine Arts NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES A private university in the public service INSTITUTE OF FINE ARTS /^ pn h 1^ liMt^itAiMfeiii a ^ D a D D D [1 D <c:i SLJ Ua iTi ^2^ EGYPT EXPLORATION FUND SPECIAL EXTBA BEPOBT THE SEASON'vS WORK AHNAS AND BENI HASAN CONTAIXING THE REPORTS OF M. NAVILLE, Mr. PERCY E. NEWBERRT AXIi Mr. ERASER (WITH SEVEN ILLUSTRATIONS) 1890—1891 FUBLISHED BY GILBERT k RIVIXGTON, Limited ST. JOHN'S HOUSE, CLERKENWELL, LONDON, E.G. ANll SOLr> AT TUE OFFICES OF THE EGYPT EXPLORATION FUND 17, Oxford JIan-siox, Oxford Circus, Loxnox, W. 181»1 J'ri'-i' Tirii Slullini/.-: au'J Sij-iniic- The Stephen Chan Library of Fine Arts NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES A private university in t/ie public service INSTITUTE OF FINE ARTS /d ilt^^^kftjMI IWMbftjfeJt^ll D D D ODD a a i THE SEASON'S WOEK AHNAS AND BENI HASAN. SPECIAL EXTEA EEPOET THE SEASON'S WOEK AT AHNAS AND BENI HASAN CONTAINIXG REPOETS BY M. NAVILLE, Mk. PERCY E. NEWBERRY 'I AND Me. GEORGE WILLOUGHBY ERASER WITH AN EISTOEICAL INTEODUCTION 1890—1891 PUBLISHED BY GILBEKT & EIVINGTON, LiiiiTED ST. JOHN'S HOUSE, CLERKENWELL, LONDON, E.G. AND SOLD AT THE OFFICES OF THE EGYPT EXPLORATION FUND 17, OxFOSD Mansion, Oxford Circus, London, W. 1891 TSStWm OF nSK EMS rew tOM. ONIVERSITT 7)7 A/ 3^ CONTENTS. Secretary 1 Introduction . Amelia B. Edwards, Honorary I. Excavations at Henassieh (Hanes) . Edouard Naville 5 II. The Tombs of Beni Hasan .
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin De L'institut Français D'archéologie
    MINISTÈRE DE L'ÉDUCATION NATIONALE, DE L'ENSEIGNEMENT SUPÉRIEUR ET DE LA RECHERCHE BULLETIN DE L’INSTITUT FRANÇAIS D’ARCHÉOLOGIE ORIENTALE en ligne en ligne en ligne en ligne en ligne en ligne en ligne en ligne en ligne en ligne BIFAO 117 (2017), p. 293-317 Aurore Motte Reden und Rufe, a Neglected Genre? Towards a Definition of the Speech Captions in Private Tombs Conditions d’utilisation L’utilisation du contenu de ce site est limitée à un usage personnel et non commercial. Toute autre utilisation du site et de son contenu est soumise à une autorisation préalable de l’éditeur (contact AT ifao.egnet.net). Le copyright est conservé par l’éditeur (Ifao). Conditions of Use You may use content in this website only for your personal, noncommercial use. Any further use of this website and its content is forbidden, unless you have obtained prior permission from the publisher (contact AT ifao.egnet.net). The copyright is retained by the publisher (Ifao). Dernières publications 9782724708288 BIFAO 121 9782724708424 Bulletin archéologique des Écoles françaises à l'étranger (BAEFE) 9782724707878 Questionner le sphinx Philippe Collombert (éd.), Laurent Coulon (éd.), Ivan Guermeur (éd.), Christophe Thiers (éd.) 9782724708295 Bulletin de liaison de la céramique égyptienne 30 Sylvie Marchand (éd.) 9782724708356 Dendara. La Porte d'Horus Sylvie Cauville 9782724707953 Dendara. La Porte d’Horus Sylvie Cauville 9782724708394 Dendara. La Porte d'Hathor Sylvie Cauville 9782724708011 MIDEO 36 Emmanuel Pisani (éd.), Dennis Halft (éd.) © Institut français d’archéologie orientale - Le Caire Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1 Reden und Rufe, a Neglected Genre? Towards a Definition of the Speech Captions in Private Tombs aurore motte* introduction Within the scope of my PhD research, I investigated a neglected corpus in Egyptology: the speech captions found in “daily life” scenes in private tombs.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharaohs in Egypt Fathi Habashi
    Laval University From the SelectedWorks of Fathi Habashi July, 2019 Pharaohs in Egypt Fathi Habashi Available at: https://works.bepress.com/fathi_habashi/416/ Pharaohs of Egypt Introduction Pharaohs were the mighty political and religious leaders who reigned over ancient Egypt for more than 3,000 years. Also known as the god-kings of ancient Egypt, made the laws, and owned all the land. Warfare was an important part of their rule. In accordance to their status as gods on earth, the Pharaohs built monuments and temples in honor of themselves and the gods of the land. Egypt was conquered by the Kingdom of Kush in 656 BC, whose rulers adopted the pharaonic titles. Following the Kushite conquest, Egypt would first see another period of independent native rule before being conquered by the Persian Empire, whose rulers also adopted the title of Pharaoh. Persian rule over Egypt came to an end through the conquests of Alexander the Great in 332 BC, after which it was ruled by the Hellenic Pharaohs of the Ptolemaic Dynasty. They also built temples such as the one at Edfu and Dendara. Their rule, and the independence of Egypt, came to an end when Egypt became a province of Rome in 30 BC. The Pharaohs who ruled Egypt are large in number - - here is a selection. Narmer King Narmer is believed to be the same person as Menes around 3100 BC. He unified Upper and Lower Egypt and combined the crown of Lower Egypt with that of Upper Egypt. Narmer or Mena with the crown of Lower Egypt The crown of Lower Egypt Narmer combined crown of Upper and Lower Egypt Djeser Djeser of the third dynasty around 2670 BC commissioned the first Step Pyramid in Saqqara created by chief architect and scribe Imhotep.
    [Show full text]
  • The Allure of Ancient Egyptian Jewelry
    Aegyptiaca. Journal of the History of Reception of Ancient Egypt The Allure of Ancient Egyptian Jewelry Yvonne J. Markowitz Rita J. Kaplan and Susan B. Kaplan Curator Emerita of Jewelry, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston For centuries, the West has been attracted to the exotic lands of the East and the cultures of the ancient world. One of the most intriguing is ancient Egypt, an African civilization that flourished during the third through the first millennium BC. In its prime, it was respected, revered, and sometimes feared. Neighboring lands were in awe of its powerful leadership, majestic architectural wonders, imposing statuary, and sophisticated decorative arts with its curious iconography and even stranger hieroglyphics. For many, Egypt held the key to understanding the world’s deepest mysteries. It was the Phoenicians (ca. 1500-300 BC), a seafaring people who lived along the Mediterranean coast in city-states now part of Lebanon, Syria, and northern Israel, who first capitalized on the fascination with all things Egyptian, especially those small objects that were easily shipped and traded. Early entrepreneurs, they served as middlemen stopping at ports in North Africa, Cyprus, Crete, the Cyclades, mainland Greece, and parts of Mesopotamia. Among the goods they bartered were raw materials, Phoenician-made glass, and an array of Egyptian adornments composed of beads and amulets fabricated from metal, stone, faience, and glass. Amuletic forms that especially resonated with Phoenician trading partners were representations of household gods, the healing (sacred) eye of Horus, and the scarab. The latter was a potent symbol of rebirth and rejuvenation based on the life-cycle of the dung beetle (scarabaeus sacer) whose activities the Egyptians associated with the life-giving sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who in Ancient Egypt
    Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Available from Routledge worldwide: Who’s Who in Ancient Egypt Michael Rice Who’s Who in the Ancient Near East Gwendolyn Leick Who’s Who in Classical Mythology Michael Grant and John Hazel Who’s Who in World Politics Alan Palmer Who’s Who in Dickens Donald Hawes Who’s Who in Jewish History Joan Comay, new edition revised by Lavinia Cohn-Sherbok Who’s Who in Military History John Keegan and Andrew Wheatcroft Who’s Who in Nazi Germany Robert S.Wistrich Who’s Who in the New Testament Ronald Brownrigg Who’s Who in Non-Classical Mythology Egerton Sykes, new edition revised by Alan Kendall Who’s Who in the Old Testament Joan Comay Who’s Who in Russia since 1900 Martin McCauley Who’s Who in Shakespeare Peter Quennell and Hamish Johnson Who’s Who in World War Two Edited by John Keegan Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Michael Rice 0 London and New York First published 1999 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. © 1999 Michael Rice The right of Michael Rice to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gift of the Nile Egypt
    Egypt The Gift of the Nile Egypt Lower Egypt Upper Egypt Nubia Early History • Pre-Dynastic • Cultural development from at least 5000 BC. • First hieroglyphic scripts date to ca. 3400 • First Dynastic Period • 1st Dynasty 3150 – 2125 BC • 2nd Dynasty 2925 – 2700 BC • An homogenous, distinct, Egyptian culture. • Afro Asiatic is the parent language of Semitic. Old Kingdom 2700 – 1552 BC: 3rd to 12th Dynasties • 3rd Dynasty 2700 – 2625 • Pyramid of Djoser at saqqara Old Kingdom 4th Dynasty 2625 – 2510 Pyramids at Giza Established the nomes system Giza Giza Giza Khufu Khafre Sphinx Menkaure Old Kingdom • 5th – 8th Dynasties • 2510 - 2180 • 9th – 10th Dynasties • 2180 – 2040 • 9th and 10th Dynasties, capital at Herakleopolis • 11th Dynasty capital at Thebes (Luxor) • Unification of Upper and Lower Egypt by Mentuhotep II: 2040. 10th and 11th Dynasties Sais Memphis 10th Dynasty capital at Herakleopolis Herakleopolis 11th Dynasty capital at Thebes Thebes (Luxor) Middle Kingdom • Middle Kingdom 2040 – 1991 • 12th Dynasty 1991 – 1783 • The Classical Period of Egyptian history • Ammenemes I 1991 – 1962 • Seized the throne from Mentuhotep IV. • Official court moved from Thebes to Memphis • Sesostris I 1971 – 1926 • Began construction of the temple complex at Karnak The 12th Dynasty ends in decades of internal competition such that the 13th and 14 Dynasties are lost to obscurity 12th Dynasty Sais Memphis 10th Dynasty capital at Herakleopolis Herakleopolis 11th Dynasty capital at Thebes Karnak Thebes Hyksos Period Sais Hyksos – Lower Egypt Memphis
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Long-Distance Trade in the Middle Kingdom and the Evidence at the Red Sea Harbour at Mersa/Wadi Gawasis
    Egyptian Long-Distance Trade in the Middle Kingdom and the Evidence at the Red Sea Harbour at Mersa/Wadi Gawasis Kathryn Bard Boston University Rodolfo Fattovich University of Naples l’Orientale Long-distance Trade in the Middle Kingdom After a period of breakdown of the centralized state in the late third millen- nium BC (the First Intermediate Period), Egypt was reunified as a result of war- fare. The victors of this warfare were kings of the later 11th Dynasty, whose power base was in the south, in Thebes. Known as the Middle Kingdom, this reunified state consolidated in the 12th Dynasty. The accomplishments of this dynasty are many, including a number of seafaring expeditions sent to the Southern Red Sea region from the harbor of Saww at Mersa/Wadi Gawasis. In the Early Middle Kingdom the reunified Egyptian state began to expand its activities outside the Nile Valley and abroad, especially for the exploitation and/or trade of raw materials used to make elite artifacts and tools, as well as timbers with which to build boats—all not available in Egypt. Copper and turquoise mines were actively exploited by expeditions in Southwestern Sinai, where extensive mines date to the Middle and New Kingdoms (Kemp 2006: 141–142; O’Connor 2006: 226). Cedar was imported in large quantities from Lebanon, and was used to make coffins for high status officials (Berman 2009), as well as to build seafaring ships that have been excavated at Egypt’s harbor on the Red Sea at Mersa/Wadi Gawasis (Bard and Fattovich 2007, 2010, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • 01 ALLEN Page 1 Friday, July 23, 2004 9:54 AM
    01 ALLEN Page 1 Friday, July 23, 2004 9:54 AM Some Theban Officials of the Early Middle Kingdom James P. Allen ver the course of his Egyptological career, the name of William Kelly Simpson has become nearly synonymous with OMiddle Kingdom studies. Although his interests have included most aspects of ancient Egyptian civilization, Kelly’s first love has always been the literature, art, and history of the Middle Kingdom. The list of his publications bears eloquent witness to just how much his scholarship has expanded and enriched our knowledge in these areas over the past forty years. It is my privilege to offer the present study— which covers an equivalent span of time in the formation of the Middle Kingdom—in tribute to Kelly’s scholarship, and with affection to an es- teemed colleague and a treasured friend. The recent redating of the tomb of Meket-re (TT 280, fig. 1) to the early years of Amenemhat I has provided a new benchmark for the art and history of the early Middle Kingdom.1 Given the service of Meket- re under Mentuhotep II (see below), this new dating now provides evi- dence for an official career stretching from the last decades of Mentuhotep II (ca. 2030–2010 B.C. in the traditional chronology), through the reign of Mentuhotep III (ca. 2010–1998 B.C.) and the end of the Eleventh Dynasty, to the first years of Dynasty 12 (ca. 1991–1981 B.C.). The titles preserved in Meket-re’s tomb are mr ∞tmt “Overseer of the Seal” and mr pr wr “Chief Steward.”2 The former identifies him as 1 Dorothea Arnold, “Amenemhat I and the Early Twelfth Dynasty at Thebes,” MMJ 26 (1991), pp.
    [Show full text]