Nikolaus Pevsner: Art History, Nation, and Exile Iain Boyd Whyte

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nikolaus Pevsner: Art History, Nation, and Exile Iain Boyd Whyte RIHA Journal 0075 | 23 October 2013 Nikolaus Pevsner: art history, nation, and exile Iain Boyd Whyte Editing and peer review managed by: Regina Wenninger, Zentralinstitut f r !unstgeschic"te, #unich Reviewers: $"ristian Fu"r&eister, 'olker Welter bstra!t Shortly after losing his teaching position at Göttingen University in September 1933, Nikolaus Pevsner 19!"#19$3% travelle& to 'nglan& as a refugee from National Socialist Germany( )hanks to his pro&igious energy an& ambition, his career flourishe&, an& at the time of his &eath in 19$3 he had become a national institution an& the preeminent e*pert on +ritish architecture( )he emotional an& scholarly transition from ,&olf -itler.s Germany to 193!s 'nglan& /as by no means easy for Pevsner, ho/ever, an& this article investigates Pevsner.s continuing &ebt at this time to German art history Kunstgeschichte% in general, an& to his &octoral supervisor, 0ilhelm Pin&er, in particular( )he &iscussion, set /ithin the broader conte*t of 1migr1 stu&ies, ad&resses the contrasting practice of art history in the t/o countries at that time an& the essential &ifferences bet/een conservatism, nationalism, an& fascism( * * * * * 213 ,t the very en& of her magisterial biography, Nikolaus Pevsner: The Life, Susie -arries conclu&es that 4he /as not 'nglish, let alone .more 'nglish than the 'nglish., an& never /ante& to be(41 Nikolaus Pevsner 19!"#19$3, 5ig( 1% /as German an& his /orking life /as &etermine& by his e&ucation in German Kunstgeschichte, the scholarly stu&y of art that barely e*iste& in +ritain before the mi&#t/entieth century( Its intro&uction into +ritish universities /as, of course, one of the great achievements of the generation of 1migr1 scholars that had been force& out of National Socialist Germany in the 193!s, le& by '&gar 0in&, 'rnst Gombrich, an& Pevsner himself( 7et his relationship to his ne/ country /as al/ays ambivalent8 46 am 293 never one hun&re& per cent sure4, he once note&, 4either ho/ far 6 am not a foreigner an& ho/ far I am(4" 2"3 Pevsner emigrate& to +ritain in :ctober 1933, less than t/enty years after the outbreak of 0orl& 0ar 6( )he scars left by this fearsome encounter an& the resulting reinforcement of national archetypes /ere still very present( Strong echoes survive& into the 193!s of mutual belligerence of 191;, /hich sa/ -( G( 0ells &amning Germany as a 1 Susie -arries, Nikolaus Pevsner: The Life <ondon: =hatto > Windus, "!11%, p( $!1( " Ibid(, p( ;91( England /as not inevitably Pevsner.s first choice for his force& emigration. 6n ?ay 1933, he /as still consi&ering 6taly as an option, arguing that 4293 the art historians there themselves feel that they have too little e*perience of northern art( So 6 /oul& have 2in 6taly3 a /onderful task of cultural propaganda 293(4 293 &ie &ortigen @unsthistoriker empfinden selbst, &aß sie von &er nor&ischen @unst Bu /enig erfahren. -ier hätte ich also eine schöne ,ufgabe &er @ulturpropaganda 293(% Pevsner, letter to @arl +rand, 3! ?ay 1933, Duote& Ulrike 0ollenhaupt# Schmi&t, 4.-itler hat &ie +Cume geschüttelt und ,merika hat &ie 5rüchte geerntet.8 Fur Geschichte &es @unstgeschichtlichen Seminars /ährend &es NationsoBialismus4, in -einrich +ecker e&(%, Die Universität Göttingen unter de Nationalso!ialis us ?ünchen: Saur, 199$%, p( ;G3( H Unless other/ise indicate&, all translations from German are by the author( License: The text of this article is provided under the ter&s of the Creative Co&mons License CC-BY0NC-ND 3.05 RIHA Journal 0075 | 23 October 2013 nation 4obsesse& by pri&e, by the cant of cynicism an& the vanity of violence( 293 :n the back of it, spurring it on, are the i&ea-mongers, the base#spirite& /riting men, pretentious little professors in frocks, scribbling colonels.43 In similar vein, the German poet, Iichar& Jehmel, countere& a fe/ /eeks later8 4=ol& as fish are these islan&#folk8 cunning, circumspect, conspiratorial, smart, an& possesse& of an insatiable appetite for booty( 0ith hypocritical in&ifference they permit all /arm#bloo&e& virtues to &ecay( )he sole motive of their policies is an uncompromising &esire for profit(4; -einrich -eine had famously insiste&, back in the 1$3!s, that one shoul&n.t sen& a German poet to <on&onKL the prospects had not improve& marke&ly by 1933 for a German art historian boun& for +irmingham( 1 Nikolaus Pevsner, 1929 (Photo: Genja Jonas. Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothe( Göttingen, Sa&mlung 'oit) 233 If there is a scholarly consensus on the state of e*ile, it is that there is no single an& share& e*perience of e*ile( Instead, there are multiple in&ivi&ual biographies, each /ith /il&ly varying contours, forme& by uniDue combinations of foresight an& haplessness, goo& an& bad planning, influential contacts an& their absence, benign fortune an& /retche& bad luck( )he results of this game of roulette, in /hich a human life is the ball that spins capriciously to/ar&s its final resting place, are pre&ictably &iverse( 3 -( G( 0ells, 4)he 0ar of the ?ind4, The Nation, "9 ,ugust 191;( ; Iichar& Jehmel, 4,n meine @inder4, "erliner Tageblatt, 9 :ctober 191; 5ischblütig ist &ieses 6nselvolk, klug, umsichtig, ge/andt, verschwiegen und von unersättlicher +eutegierK alle /armblütigen )ugenden lCAt es mit heuchlerischem Gleichmut verkümmern. Iücksichtslose Ge/innsucht ist &ie )riebfe&er seiner ganzen Politik(%( L 4,ber schickt keine Poeten nach <ondon!4 -einrich -eine, 4Englische 5ragmente4 1$"$%, #eisebilder 5rankfurt am ?ain: 6nsel Nerlag, 19$!%, p( L!G( License: The text of this article is provided under the ter&s of the Creative Co&mons License CC-BY0NC-ND 3.05 RIHA Journal 0075 | 23 October 2013 5or the least fortunate, e*ile means the loss of all that /as of valueK for the most fortunate, it heral&s the start of a ne/ adventure that offers boun&less re/ar&s. )heo&or 0( ,&orno characteriBe& the former position /ith his pessimistic assertion, made in $ini a $oralia, that the 1migr1 intellectual 4lives in an environment that must remain incomprehensible to him, ho/ever flawless his kno/le&ge of tra&e#union organisations or the motor traffic may beK he is al/ays astray( 293 )he share of the social pro&uct that falls to aliens is insufficient, an& forces them into a hopeless secon& struggle /ith the general competition amongst themselves. ,ll this leaves no in&ivi&ual unmarke&(4O In contrast, Nil1m 5lusser has insiste& on a more positive reading of the e*ile con&ition8 )he e*ile is the other of the other( )hat means, he is &ifferent for the others, an& the others are &ifferent for him( -e himself is nothing but the other of the others, an& only in this /ay can he .i&entify. himself( ,n& his arrival in e*ile allo/s the natives to &iscover that they can only .i&entify. themselves in relationship to him( 293 5or the e*ile threatens the .particularity. of the native an& Duestions it in his alienness. 7et even this polemical &ialogue is creative, as it leads to the synthesis of ne/ information( '*ile, in /hatever form, is the bree&ing groun& for creative action, for the ne/(G 2;3 ,s a German of Pe/ish &escent, /ho had no great &esire to be Pe/ish, /ho felt isolate& by the anti#Semitism he had e*perience& in his youth, an& /ho had converte& to <utheranism in ,pril 19"1, imme&iately before commencing his university stu&ies in ?unich, Pevsner /as in a particularly complicate& an& vulnerable position( Intentionally rootless at home, he /as &oubly rootless /hen he foun& himself in 'nglan& in 1933, an& his response to the historical an& political forces that had &riven him into e*ile is riven /ith complications an& para&o*es. ?ost para&o*ical of all, for a scholar /ho in September 1933 had lost his position at Göttingen University on racial groun&s, /as the continuing sympathy that he e*presse& in 1933 an& 193; for the politics of his oppressors, ,&olf -itler.s National Socialist German 0orkers' Party NSJ,P%( 2L3 Stephen Games first broache& this topic in his intro&uction to a collection of Pevsner.s ra&io talks, publishe& in "!!"( Games recounts here a conversation that took place in Göttingen in ?ay 1933, bet/een Pevsner an& a +irmingham schoolteacher in O )heo&or 0( ,&orno, $ini a $oralia: #eflections fro Damaged Life, trans( '( 5( N( Pephcott <ondon: Nerso, 19G$%, p( 33 2German: ,&orno, $ini a $oralia: #efle%ionen aus de beschädigten Leben +erlin and 5rankfurtQ?ain: Suhrkamp, 19L1%, p( ;L Pe&er 6ntellektuelle in &er 'migration 293 lebt in einer Um/elt, &ie ihm unverständlich bleiben muA, auch /enn er sich in &en Ge/erkschaftsorganisationen o&er &em ,utoverkehr noch so gut auskenntK immerBu ist er in &er 6rre( 293 Jer ,nteil &es SoBialpro&ukts, &er auf &ie 5rem&en entfällt, /ill nicht ausreichen und treibt sie Bur hoffnungslosen B/eiten @onkurrenz untereinander inmitten &er allgemeinen. ,ll &as hinterlCAt ?ale in je&em Einzelnen.%3( G Nil1m 5lusser, &on der 'reiheit des $igranten: Eins)rüche gegen Nationalis us +ensheim8 +ollmann Nerlag, 199;%, p( 1!9 Jer Nertriebene ist &er andere &er anderen. Jas heiAt, er ist für &ie anderen anders, und &ie anderen sind anders für ihn. Er selbst ist nichts als &er andere &er anderen, und nur so kann er sich .i&entifiBieren'( Und seine ,nkunft im '*il lCAt &ie Urein/ohner ent&ecken, &aß auch sie sich nur in +eBug auf ihn .i&entifiBieren' können.
Recommended publications
  • The Concept of Bildung in Early German Romanticism
    CHAPTER 6 The Concept of Bildung in Early German Romanticism 1. Social and Political Context In 1799 Friedrich Schlegel, the ringleader of the early romantic circle, stated, with uncommon and uncharacteristic clarity, his view of the summum bonum, the supreme value in life: “The highest good, and [the source of] ev- erything that is useful, is culture (Bildung).”1 Since the German word Bildung is virtually synonymous with education, Schlegel might as well have said that the highest good is education. That aphorism, and others like it, leave no doubt about the importance of education for the early German romantics. It is no exaggeration to say that Bildung, the education of humanity, was the central goal, the highest aspiration, of the early romantics. All the leading figures of that charmed circle—Friedrich and August Wilhelm Schlegel, W. D. Wackenroder, Friedrich von Hardenberg (Novalis), F. W. J. Schelling, Ludwig Tieck, and F. D. Schleiermacher—saw in education their hope for the redemption of humanity. The aim of their common journal, the Athenäum, was to unite all their efforts for the sake of one single overriding goal: Bildung.2 The importance, and indeed urgency, of Bildung in the early romantic agenda is comprehensible only in its social and political context. The young romantics were writing in the 1790s, the decade of the cataclysmic changes wrought by the Revolution in France. Like so many of their generation, the romantics were initially very enthusiastic about the Revolution. Tieck, Novalis, Schleiermacher, Schelling, Hölderlin, and Friedrich Schlegel cele- brated the storming of the Bastille as the dawn of a new age.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Beuys and the Reincarnation of German Romanticism
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work Spring 5-2003 Postwar Landscapes: Joseph Beuys and the Reincarnation of German Romanticism Lauren Elizabeth Smith University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Smith, Lauren Elizabeth, "Postwar Landscapes: Joseph Beuys and the Reincarnation of German Romanticism" (2003). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/601 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ----------------~~------~--------------------- Postwar Landscapes: Joseph Beuys and the Reincarnation of German Romanticism Lauren E. Smith College Scholars Senior Thesis University of Tennessee May 1,2003 Dr. Dorothy Habel, Dr. Tim Hiles, and Dr. Peter Hoyng, presiding committee Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Beuys' Germany: The 'Inability to Mourn' 3 III. Showman, Shaman, or Postwar Savoir? 5 IV. Beuys and Romanticism: Similia similibus curantur 9 V. Romanticism in Action: Celtic (Kinloch Rannoch) 12 VI. Celtic+ ---: Germany's symbolic salvation in Basel 22 VII. Conclusion 27 Notes Bibliography Figures Germany, 1952 o Germany, you're torn asunder And not just from within! Abandoned in cold and darkness The one leaves the other alone. And you've got such lovely valleys And plenty of thriving towns; If only you'd trust yourself now, Then all would be just fine.
    [Show full text]
  • GERMAN LITERARY FAIRY TALES, 1795-1848 by CLAUDIA MAREIKE
    ROMANTICISM, ORIENTALISM, AND NATIONAL IDENTITY: GERMAN LITERARY FAIRY TALES, 1795-1848 By CLAUDIA MAREIKE KATRIN SCHWABE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2012 1 © 2012 Claudia Mareike Katrin Schwabe 2 To my beloved parents Dr. Roman and Cornelia Schwabe 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisory committee chair, Dr. Barbara Mennel, who supported this project with great encouragement, enthusiasm, guidance, solidarity, and outstanding academic scholarship. I am particularly grateful for her dedication and tireless efforts in editing my chapters during the various phases of this dissertation. I could not have asked for a better, more genuine mentor. I also want to express my gratitude to the other committee members, Dr. Will Hasty, Dr. Franz Futterknecht, and Dr. John Cech, for their thoughtful comments and suggestions, invaluable feedback, and for offering me new perspectives. Furthermore, I would like to acknowledge the abundant support and inspiration of my friends and colleagues Anna Rutz, Tim Fangmeyer, and Dr. Keith Bullivant. My heartfelt gratitude goes to my family, particularly my parents, Dr. Roman and Cornelia Schwabe, as well as to my brother Marius and his wife Marina Schwabe. Many thanks also to my dear friends for all their love and their emotional support throughout the years: Silke Noll, Alice Mantey, Lea Hüllen, and Tina Dolge. In addition, Paul and Deborah Watford deserve special mentioning who so graciously and welcomingly invited me into their home and family. Final thanks go to Stephen Geist and his parents who believed in me from the very start.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Recent Definitions of German Romanticism, Or the Case Against Dialectics
    SOME RECENT DEFINITIONS OF GERMAN ROMANTICISM, OR THE CASE AGAINST DIALECTICS by Robert L. Kahn When the time came for me to be seriously thinking about writing this paper-and you can see from the title and description that I gave myself plenty of leeway-I was caught in a dilemma. In the beginning my plan had been simple enough: I wanted to present a report on the latest develop- ments in the scholarship of German Romanticism. As it turned out, I had believed very rashly and naively that I could carry on where Julius Peter- sen's eclectic and tolerant book Die Wesensbestimmung der deutschen Romantik (Leipzig, 1926), Josef Komer's fragmentary and unsystematic reviews in the Marginalien (Frankfurt a. M., 1950), and Franz Schultz's questioning, though irresolute, paper "Der gegenwartige Stand der Roman- tikforschungM1had left off. As a matter of fact, I wrote such an article, culminating in what I then considered to be a novel definition of German Romanticism. But the more I thought about the problem, the less I liked what I had done. It slowly dawned on me that I had been proceeding on a false course of inquiry, and eventually I was forced to reconsider several long-cherished views and to get rid of certain basic assumptions which I had come to recognize as illusory and prejudicial. It became increasingly obvious to me that as a conscientious literary historian I could not discuss new contributions to Romantic scholarship in vacuo, but that I was under an obligation to relate the spirit of these pronouncements to our own times, as much as to relate their substance to the period in question.
    [Show full text]
  • Baroque Violin Sonatas
    Three Dissertation Recitals: the German Romanticism in Instrumental Music and the Baroque Instrumental Genres by Yun-Chie Wang A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts (Music Performance) in the University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor Aaron Berofsky, Chair Professor Colleen M. Conway Professor Anthony Elliott Assistant Professor Joseph Gascho Professor Vincent Young Yun-Chie (Rita) Wang [email protected] ORCID id: 0000-0001-5541-3855 © Rita Wang 2018 DEDICATION To my mother who has made sacrifices for me every single day To my 90-year old grandmother whose warmth I still carry ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members for helping me become a more thoughtful musician. I would like to give special thanks to Professor Aaron Berofsky for his teaching and support and Professor Joseph Gascho for his guidance and collaboration. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii LIST OF FIGURES v ABSTRACT vi Dissertation Recital No. 1 Beyond Words Program 1 Program Notes 2 Dissertation Recital No. 2 Baroque Violin Sonatas Program 13 Program Notes 14 Dissertation Recital No. 3 Baroque Dances, a Fugue, and a Concerto Program 20 Program Notes 22 BIBLIOGRAPHY 31 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page Fig. 1, The engraving of the Guardian Angel (printed in the manuscript of the Mystery Sonatas by Heinrich Ignaz Franz von Biber) 27 Fig. 2, Opening measures of the fugue from Op. 10, No. 6 by Bartolomeo Campagnoli 29 Fig. 3, Opening measures of the fugue from Sonata No. 3, BWV 1005, by J.
    [Show full text]
  • French Romanticism and the Reinvention of Love by Maxime A
    French Romanticism and the Reinvention of Love By Maxime A. Foerster A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Romance Languages and Literatures: French) In the University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee: Professor Michèle A. Hannoosh, Chair Professor Cristina Moreiras-Menor Associate Professor Jarrod L. Hayes Associate Professor Nadine M. Hubbs Lecturer Esther Newton © Maxime A. Foerster 2012 Dedication Au charchour ii Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to David Halperin, David Caron and Frieda Ekotto for having encouraged me to start my PhD at UM, Ann Arbor. I have been honored and stimulated to work with Michèle Hannoosh who taught me coherence and rigor throughout these years of thinking and writing. I feel privileged to have been able to write my dissertation with those I called my dream team, composed of Professors Michèle Hannoosh, Jarrod Hayes, Cristina Moreiras, Esther Newton and Nadine Hubbs. For their friendship, support and fabulousness, I would like to thank Aaron Boalick, Jennifer Bonnet, Virginie Brinker, Neil Doshi, Matthieu Dupas, Gilles Freissinier, Aston Gonzales, Melanie Hawthorne, Trevor Hoppe, Lauren Kennedy, Gérard Koskovich, Charline Lafage, Larry La Fountain, Nicolas Lamorte, Bertrand Metton, Pedro Monaville, Marie-Pierre Pruvot, Pantxika Passicot, Steve Puig, Marie Stoll, Marcelino Viera, and Yannick Viers. I will never thank my parents enough for their love and understanding. Above all, thank you, H.N. iii Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Iconography and Symbolism in German Romanticism
    Chapter 4: Iconography and Symbolism in German Romanticism The Influence of Dutch Painters: Jakob van Ruisdael (1628 – 1682) Unlike his contemporaries Jakob van Ruisdael (already in the 17th century did not focus the exact reproduction of a specific landscape but painted self-designed fantasy-landscapes that were composed of different motifs. He used symbols that were distinct to the beholder. His paintings often show symbols of “vanitas” (which means “caducity”). So for example graves and graveyards and ruins show the decay and breakup of life. In his work “jewish cemetery” 1670/75) the tombs and ruins and the streaming water symbolise the dissolution of life and of human creation. In contrary to this the rainbow - for example - symbolises hope. C.D. Friedrich, the famous and maybe most important painter of early romanticism, learned to know those paintings of Ruisdael during his study in Dresden. Jakob van Ruisdael “Jewish cemetery” 1670-5 Symbolism in the Work of Caspar David Friedrich For C.D. Friedrich “the feeling of the artist is his ordinance” **. Therefore the landscapes in his paintings are “landscapes of mood” that are based on his individual feelings. He composes his landscapes by arranging important elements and motifs he “experienced” on his journeys. He quite often sketched these motifs by “sepia-technique” and lateron connected them in his studio according his liking. By the sheer subjectivity of this feeling C.D. Friedrich in contrary to Ruisdael not always creates a definite symbolism of the illustrated persons, items and even times of the day or of the seasons. The strong religiousity of C.D.
    [Show full text]
  • On Early German Romanticism As an Essentially Skeptical Movement
    Lecture 1 On Early German Romanticism as an Essentially Skeptical Movement The Reinhold-Fichte Connection call these lectures “The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism.” I owe you some explanation for this title. First let me clarify what I mean by the term ‘foundations.’ I do not mean something I like principles or highest fundamental propositions, from which other propositions are deduced. This is worth emphasizing because the post-Kantian mood in Germany was filled with a tendency to view philosophy as an activity which necessarily departed from an absolute principle. Karl Leonhard Reinhold and Johann Gottlieb Fichte fit squarely into this tradition. Fichte was a professor in Jena from 1794–99 and his predecessor had been Reinhold, who had introduced a philosophy of this sort in 1789.1 Certainly, the group of thinkers who became known as the early German Romantics were influenced by both Reinhold and Fichte, indeed Friedrich von Hardenberg (Novalis) had been Reinhold’s student from 1790 to 1791. During this time and also later, Novalis was in contact with a number of fellow students who had also studied under Reinhold and whose names have now been forgotten; among them Johann Benjamin Eberhard, Friedrich Karl Forberg, Franz Paul von Herbert, and Friedrich Immanuel Niethammer stand out. In disputes concerning Reinhold’s Philosophy of Elements (Elementarphilosophie), this group of young thinkers came to the conclusion that a philosophy, which seeks to follow a method of deduction from some highest fundamental principle, is either dispensable or downright impossible. In the course of these lectures, I will show you that Novalis and Friedrich Schlegel shared this conviction, namely, that it is impossible to establish an 23 24 The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism absolute foundation for philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • TOCC0335DIGIBKLT.Pdf
    WENZEL HEINRICH VEIT: COMPLETE STRING QUARTETS VOLUME ONE: QUARTETS NOS. 1 AND 2 by Markéta Kabelková and Aleš Březina Te first half of the nineteenth century saw a change from old to new forms of musical life. Performances accessible to the general public were increasingly promoted, and from the third quarter of the eighteenth century public concerts and publicly accessible musical theatres began to be developed. A lively and diverse cultural environment tends to emerge in places that are not only strong economically – that is, have a solid, educated middle class – but also have an existing cultural tradition. Although Prague was at that time the capital of the Czech kingdom and as such part of the Hapsburg monarchy, no ruler resided within the city, which therefore lacked the cultural life associated with a royal court. It was nonetheless an important European musical centre – the most important in Bohemia – and a popular stop for musicians on their concert tours. In 1810 the ‘Jednota pro zvelebení hudby v Čechách’ (‘Association for the Promotion of Music in Bohemia’) was established there and, only one year later, the Prague Conservatoire was founded, becoming the first professional training institution for musicians in central Europe. New forms of social life influenced demand for certain types of music, particularly smaller-scale compositions (songs, piano pieces and choruses). Larger instrumental compositions– such as symphonies, concertos and chamber music (which at that time was not intended for public concerts but to be played for smaller audiences) – were far less popular in Bohemia during the first half of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is German Romanticism (Noch Einmal), Or the Limits of Scholarship
    1 Figure: What Is German Romanticism (noch einmal), or The Limits of Scholarship The world must be romanticized. This is the way to rediscover its original meaning. By giving the base a lofty meaning, the ordi- nary an appearance of mystery, the known the dignity of the unknown and the finite an aura of infinity, I romanticize it. —Novalis The mere idea of a coincidence of opposites can arouse in us inklings of the reality of the unseen, for we are stirred, even in spite of ourselves, by anything that bodes release from the prison of quotidian logic. Yet, to affirm the reali- ty of the unseen, that is, to be a transcendentalist in Western academic cul- ture at the turn of the century, is akin to being a liberal in current American politics: both positions are generally regarded as fraught with hope-fueled delusion and sentimental idealism. Consider, for instance, some recent post- structuralist re-visions of German Romanticism, which appear to have under- mined that movement’s lofty status in the annals of Western culture, a status that resides, in large measure, in its unabashed appreciation of the mystery of ontic unity. This undermining has taken two forms, one tendentious, the other well-intentioned. Paul de Man, echoing in The Rhetoric of Romanticism Nietzsche’s deconstruction of traditional metaphysical verities, epitomizes the former trend in his outright excoriation of the Romantic vision of Paradise Regained: “The idea of innocence recovered at the far side and by way of 19 20 GOING BEYOND THE PAIRS experience, of paradise consciously regained after the fall into consciousness, the idea, in other words, of a teleological and apocalyptic history of con- sciousness is, of course, one of the most seductive, powerful, and deluded topoi of the idealist and romantic period” (267).
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Romanticism, and Where Did It Come From?
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-84891-6 - The Cambridge Companion to German Romanticism Edited by Nicholas Saul Excerpt More information 1 AZADE SEYHAN What is Romanticism, and where did it come from? Since the significance and history of German Romanticism is embedded in an exceptionally complex configuration of sociopolitical, religious and aesthetic phenomena, this chapter comprises three sections. The first focuses on the larger historical and political context of the Romantic movement in Germany, the second on the philosophical, cultural and aesthetic coordinates of German Romanticism, and the final section investigates the critical aesthetics of the Jena or early German Romantics, as articulated in the fragments and aphorisms of the journals Lyceum der schönen Künste (1797) and Athenaeum (1798–1800). The term ‘Romanticism’, as defined in this chapter, refers predominantly to the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century concept of an era informed by the profound experience of momentous political, social and intellectual revolu- tions. The term also has its own history, which calls for a short introduction. The etymology of the word ‘Romantic’ can be traced to the old French romanz, which referred to the vernacular ‘romance’ languages, Italian, French, Spanish, Catalan, Portuguese and Provençal, which were devel- oped from Latin. Subsequently, tales of chivalry, written in one of these romance languages , came to be known as medieval romance or romaunt. These were often composed in verse and narrated a quest. Later, the authors of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, such as Dante, Ariosto, Torquato Tasso, Cervantes and Shakespeare, who abandoned classical forms, were seen as inventors of a romantic, fantastical style.
    [Show full text]
  • Schoenberg and the Gesamtkunstwerk Path to Abstraction By
    Schoenberg and the Gesamtkunstwerk Path to Abstraction by John Blythe A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of MA by Research in the History of Art Dept. of Art History, Curating and Visual Studies, College of Arts and Law, University of Birmingham. February 2019. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. To the technicians Tom and Marlowe Contents Lists of Figures Lists of Illustrations Introduction page 1 Schoenberg’s First Exhibitions page 3 Review of literature page 14 National Gallery Exhibition page 20 Berlinische Exhibition page 27 Richard Gerstl page 29 Schoenberg’s Jewish Antecedents page 35 Research Methodology page 43 Thesis Structure page 51 Chapter 1 Schoenberg’s fin-de-siècle Vienna and Harmonielehre. page 53 The Discourse on Synaesthesia in fin-de-siècle Vienna page 53 Austrian culture and politics page 56 Origins of Viennese Discourse on Synaesthesia page 60 A Widening Discourse page 66 Schoenberg’s Harmonielehre page 76 Honoré de Balzac’s Seraphita page 90 Summary page 92 Chapter 2: First Triad – Wagner, Schopenhauer and Schoenberg. page 94 Gesamtkunstwerk page 94 Overtones to the First Triad page 116 Gurrelieder, a new redemption page 125 Summary page 128 Chapter 3: Second Triad and the Idea of Language.
    [Show full text]