In the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone: Dosimetry and Radiobiological Effects
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Modelling Radiocaesium Fluxes in Forest Ecosystems
BY0000223 Modelling Radiocaesium Fluxes in Forest Ecosystems Results from the ECP-5 project conducted under the Agreement for International Collaboration on the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident between the European Commission and the Ministries for Chernobyl Affairs in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine G. Shaw: Centre for Analytical Research in the Environment, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7TE, United Kingdom A Kliashtorin, S. Mamikhin, A Shcheglov: Radioecology Laboratory, Soil Science Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119899 Russian Federation B. Rafferty: Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland, 3 Clonskeagh Square, Clonskeagh Road, Dublin 14, Ireland A. Dvornik, T. Zhuchenko: Byelorussian Research Institute of Forestry, Gomel, Belarus N. Kuchma: 'Pripyat' Research and Industrial Association, 1-a B. Khmelnitsky Street, Chernobyl, 255620 Ukraine Abstract: Monitoring of radiocaesium inventories and fluxes has been carried out in forest ecosystems in Ukraine, Belarus and Ireland to determine distributions and rates of migration. This information has been used to construct and calibrate mathematical models which are being used to predict the likely longevity of contamination of forests and forest products such as timber following the Chernobyl accident. 1. Introduction Little information on radionuclide migration processes within forest ecosystems existed before the Chernobyl accident. Yet in countries such as Belarus, where approximately 20% of the national forest cover is contaminated to levels in excess of 15 Ci km"2 (555 kBq m"2), the post-contamination management of forests is a highly important economic and social problem [1]. During the period 1992 - 1995 forest sites contaminated by the Chernobyl accident in Ukraine, Belarus and Ireland have been monitored by ECP-5 to determine the magnitudes of radionuclide fluxes (principally radiocaesium) between the major components of the forest ecosystems concerned. -
Securing the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone Against Illegal Movement of Radioactive Materials
Securing the Chornobyl exclusion zone against illegal movement of radioactive materials Oleg O. Bondarenko1, Mykola I. Proskura2, Klaus E. Duftschmid3, Nikolay E. Kravchenko4, 1 SSSIE Ecocentre, 6 Shkilna Street, Chornobyl 07270, Kyiv region, Ukraine, E-mail [email protected] 2 State dept. – Administration of the Chornobyl Exclusion zone, 14 Radyanska Street, Chornobyl 07270, Kyiv region, Ukraine 3 Technical University Graz, Institute for Techn. Physics, 15 Petersgasse, A-8010 Graz, Austria, Consultant to IAEA 4 State Customs Committee of Russian Federation, 11/5 Novozavodskaya, 121087 Moscow, Russia Abstracts. Within the framework of the IAEA Nuclear Security Program the technical cooperation project “Strengthening Security of Nuclear Materials in Ukraine” (UKR/0/008) is aimed primarily to strengthen protection the entrance/exit checkpoints of the Chornobyl exclusion zone and adjacent State borders of Ukraine against illicit movement of radioactive materials (including nuclear materials). The particular situation of the exclusion zone presents a high risk of uncontrolled movement of radioactive materials from and into the exclusion zone. In view of the future construction of the “Shelter-2” and decommissioning of the three closed reactor blocks it is expected that the traffic through the exclusion zone will considerably increase in the next years and those large amounts of possibly contaminated metal scrap, construction material and equipment will leave the zone. There is also a risk of illegal movement of radioactive waste into the zone, possibly also through the international border, which could make the zone to an illegal dumping ground for radioactive waste. As practice shows theft of nuclear materials cannot be excluded. -
The Chornobyl Disasterin the Cultural and Historical Discourse
І Міжнародна наукова конференція «ВОЄННІ КОНФЛІКТИ ТА ТЕХНОГЕННІ КАТАСТРОФИ: історичні та психологічні наслідки»(до 35 роковин аварії на Чорнобильській АЕС) 2. Sriramachari, S. (2004), The Bhopal gas tragedy: An environmental disaster. Current Science, 86(7), 905-920. Retrieved April 19, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24109273 3. Mittal A. (2015): Retrospection of Bhopal gas tragedy, Toxicological &Environmental Chemistry, DOI: 10.1080/02772248.2015.1125903 4. Basha O., Alajmy J., Newaz T. (2009) Bhopal gas Tragedy: A safety case study, from https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/187848. UDC 165.2 Shchyhelska H., Ph.D., Assoc. Prof. Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University, Ukraine THE CHORNOBYL DISASTERIN THE CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL DISCOURSE Щигельська Г., к.істор.н., доц. ЧОРНОБИЛЬСЬКА КАТАСТРОФА У КУЛЬТУРНО-ІСТОРИЧНОМУ ДИСКУРСІ The Chernobyl disaster is a tragic event that impressed everyone with its scale, caused international resonance and was reflected in various forms of cultural reproduction which prompted a new understanding of the world as well as became a «generator» of historical experience and «living memory» of the Ukrainian nation. The Chornobyl Exclusion Zone can be considered a place of the technological, socio-cultural and political crisis. The zone arose rather as a result of that crisis - it is a symbol of the dead political system and utopian Soviet ideals. In Western literature the expression «cultural Chernobyl» which distinguishes the constituent basis of «spiritual extinction» is often used in relation to the mental and spiritual crisis of the post-Soviet society. In fact, after the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine, rising on the ruins of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, was held hostage to the disaster and it became a mnemonic place of rethinking of the post-Soviet life in general by gradually becoming a transit meeting place for West and East. -
Support to Radioactive Waste Management in Ukraine Project U4.01/10 D
EC- UkraineContract International No.: NSI/2014/341 Nuclear Safety-739 Cooperation (INSC) Program Support to radioactive waste management in Ukraine Project U4.01/10 D Project D: Investigation of radioactive waste burial and temporary storage sites in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone Project D Leader: Dr. Norbert Molitor, Plejades Project Director: Dr. Zoran Drace, Plejades Presentation by: Dmitri Bugai, IGS, Ukraine (national project expert) Ukraine-Japan Collaboration Workshop , Kiev, 30 January 2015 Overview of clean-up waste burial sites (RWTSP) Support to radioactive waste management in Ukraine 09 July 2014 (U4.01/10 C+D+F project) RWTSP - Radioactive Waste Temporary Storage Places 9 RWTSP Sites: • Neftebaza Kopachi Clamp example • Peschanoe Plato • Old/Staraya Stroybaza • New/Novaya Stroybaza • Chistogalovka • Kopachi • Pripyat • Red Forest Red Forest Trench example • Yanov Station In total (currently characterized) 470 trenches and clamps 884,000 m³ radwaste (~ 70% investigated of the tot.area of ~12km2) RWDS - Radioactive Waste Disposal Sites Engineered facilities: Podlesny • Podlesny • ChNPP 3rd Stage 3rd turn ChNPP • RWDS contain (potentially) HLW – LLW originating from Sarcophagus site (1986-87) • Inventory is highly uncertain • Waste storage conditions do not comply with safety requirements Chernobyl 3rd stage Radwaste Inventory data for ChEZ Aims of Project D Investigation of radioactive waste burial and temporary storage sites in the ChEZ: – Characterization of waste disposal sites using airborne geophysical techniques (location, -
The Competition Commission
CHERNOBYL – A NUCLEAR C ATASTROPHE 20 YEARS ON A REVIEW OF THE PRESENT SITUATION IN THE UKRAINE O REF N Q3143-A2 Client: GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL 1ST ISSUE REVISION NO APPROVED CURRENT ISSUE DATE 21 DECEMBER 2 005 Q3143-A1-11 22 APRIL 2006 2 - 29 CHERNOBYL – A NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE 20 YEARS ON SUMMARY Twenty years ago the No 4 reactor of the Chernobyl nuclear power and excused on the basis that they, those receiving the higher dose station underwent catastrophic failure, spewing radioactivity into and risk, can choose to leave whenever they themselves wish to do the environment for 10 or so days. The radiological consequences so. applied throughout most of Europe, extending as far afield as Britain and Scandinavia. Locally, in the regions of the Ukraine, It might not be a full understanding to put this deadlock entirely Russian and Belarus, the radiological situation was very severe, in down to the almost symbiotic relationship that has developed fact so bad necessitating the immediate evacuation of ninety between those in the contaminated territories, who receive financial thousand or more population from towns and villages nearby the compensation, and the politicians who look towards this stricken Chernobyl nuclear power plant and, as time passed, whole compensated group as a block vote. Correcting this overdosing via settlements were evacuated, demolished and ploughed into the the food uptake path requires a greater degree of intervention ground, and more and more stringent controls over foodstuffs and management of the agricultural cycle and critical group habit. Put agricultural were imposed. simply, it requires additional resources costing relatively small sums of money to finance, perhaps no more that €10M per year for Today the town of Pripyat, once home to 50,000, remains deserted a few successive years. -
The Cause of the Chernobyl Accident 1. USSR State Committee on The
NOTES Introduction: The Cause Of The Chernobyl Accident 1. USSR State Committee on the Utilization of Atomic Energy, "The Acci dent at Chernobyl' Nuclear Power Plant and Its Consequences," presented at the International Atomic Energy Agency Post-Accident Review Meeting, Vienna, August 25-29, 1986. 2. USSR State Committee, "The Accident at Chernobyl"; A. Dastur, R. Osborne, D. Pendergast, D. Primeau, V. Snell and D. Torgerson, "A Quick Look at the Post-Accident Review Meeting (PARM)," Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, AECL-9327, September 1986. 3. P.S.W. Chan, A.R. Dastur, S.D. Grant, J.M. Hopwood, and B. Chexal, "The Chernobyl Accident: Multidimensional Simulations to Identify the Role of Design and Operational Features of the RBMK-1000," paper presented to the ENS/ ANS Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Risk Assess ment, Zurich, Switzerland, August 30-September 4, 1987. 4. V.G. Asmolov eta!., "The Accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant: One Year After," preliminary translation of principal Soviet paper presented by N.N. Ponomarev-Stepnoj to the International Atomic Energy Agency International Conference on Nuclear Power Plant Performance and Safety, Vienna, September 28-0ctober 2, 1987. 5. Chan eta!., "The Chernobyl Accident." 6. Ibid. 279 280 Notes 7. V.G. Asmolov et al., "The Accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant." 8. "CANDU Nuclear Generating Station Technical Summary," Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, PA-4, CANDU Operations, Mississauga. 9. V.G. Snell, "Safety of CANDU Nuclear Power stations," Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, AECL-6329, January 1985. 10. For a detailed technical evaluation, see J.Q. Howieson and V.G. -
Olena Burdo, Alla Lipska, Olena Sova, Natalia Ryabchenko
Institute for Nuclear Research, Kiev, Ukraine The Radioecology Research Department COMPLEX RADIOBIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF SMALL RODENTS FROM THE CHERNOBYL EXCLUSION ZONE Olena Burdo, Alla Lipska, Olena Sova, Natalia Ryabchenko 30 th August 2016, Chernihiv, Ukraine Outline of the report • Setting of the problem • Organization of the study – Place of study – Chernobyl exclusion zone – The object of study – murine rodents – Subject of study : cytogenetic, hematologic, morphophysiological parameters • The results of investigation – Cytogenetic effects – Hematologic effects – Morphophysiological effects – Link between the rate of the radiation factor and cytogenetic effects . Conclusions 2 Setting of the problem • Research of the radiobiological effects is needed under the following conditions : – Low dosed-radiation – Prolonged irradiation (during the whole life cycle) – Combinated exposure (external + internal) – Different types of exposure (α-, β-, γ-) • Creating these conditions in the ordinary radiobiological experiment is difficult enough • We can use “in situ ” – contaminated sites. For example, Chernobyl exclusion zone 3 DESCRIPTION OF TEST SITES IN THE EXCLUSION ZONE Test site № 1 Yaniv γ 550 – 1400 μR/h 137Cs 3.6-20 MBq/m2 90Sr 0.68 – 2.1 MBq/m2 Control Test site γ 0,1 – 0,2 μR/h /h Test site № 2 Dityatki γ 20 – 22 μR/h 137Cs 0.18-0.27 MBq/m2 90Sr 0.013-0.015 MBq/m2 4 Algorithm of research Species: Species: .Clethrionomus •Cytogenetic parameters: (Myodes) glareolus •Mitotic index •Apoptosis •Micronucleus test •Binuclear cells •Premature chromosome condensation (PCC) •Flow cytometry Estimation of doses Radionuclide Contamination in animals organisms 5 Cesium 137 distribution in organs and tissues, % Gastrointestinal tract Heart Other Muscles Spleen Skeleton Skin kidneys Lungs Liver Strontium 90 distribution in organs and tissues, % Muscles Gastrointestinal tract About 90 % of Skin Other Strontium 90 is accumulated exactly in the tissues of skeleton Skeleton Results of micronucleus analysis of bone marrow cells C. -
4 Days Tour (PDF)
The most extended group photo tour is the ‘ALL YOU CAN EAT’ on our menu. Besides “must see” iconic Chernobyl Photo Tour places and objects, bonus places, this tour will give another layer of emotion to your story. Meeting babushkas, self-settlers and workers, capturing their lives through your lenses, with wildlife, flora and fauna around you, is the whole package. The highlight is a sunset photo shoot and also an early-bird (4 days) sunrise shoot. GET YOUR LENS READY FOR: THE NEAREST VILLAGE TO “THE WORMWOOD STAR” ALLEY OF HOPE AND MONUMENT TO “THOSE WHO CHERNOBYL OPEN AIR ST. ELIJAH CHURCH IN CHERNOBYL SIGN LENIN MONUMENT THE CHERNOBYL NPP – KO- MEMORIAL COMPLEX MEMORY SAVED THE WORLD” MUSEUM OF MACHINERY CHERNOBYL PACHI AND KINDERGARTEN CHERNOBYL NEW SAFE PANORAMA VIEW OF CHER- DUGA RADAR STATION - CHERNOBYL-2 MILITARY UNFINISHED POWER PLANT EXPERIMENTAL LABORATO- MEETING THE LOCAL INHAB- CONFINEMENT (“SARCOPH- NOBYL NUCLEAR POWER ZALISSYA VILLAGE “RUSSIAN WOODPECKER” TOWN COOLING TOWERS RY - FISH FARM ITANTS - SELF-SETTLERS AGUS”) PLANT COMMAND CENTRE OF TRAINING CENTRE OF VILLAGES - KUPUVATE, “BRIDGE OF DEATH” ABANDONED VILLAGES SOVIET TANK “ISU-152” “YANIV” RAILWAY STATION CHERNOBYL MUSEUM “DUGA” “DUGA” PARYSHIV, KRASNE... PRIPYAT: MONUMENT “TREE OF RIVER PORT AND CAFÉ PRIPYAT SIGN CINEMA PROMETHEUS MAIN SQUARE LENIN BOULEVARD ART SCHOOL PRIPYAT “WHITE HOUSE” FRIENDSHIP OF NATIONS” “PRIPYAT” The programme is subject to change based on the weather conditions and the administration of the zone. Entering buildings in Pripyat has been officially prohibited since April 2012. The most extended group photo tour is the ‘ALL YOU CAN EAT’ on our menu. -
Nuclear Semiotics, Atomic Tourism, and International Law: Tourism to the Chernobyl Site
NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 46 Number 4 Online Issue Article 3 2020 Nuclear Semiotics, Atomic Tourism, and International Law: Tourism to the Chernobyl Site Cannon Lane Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Cannon Lane, Nuclear Semiotics, Atomic Tourism, and International Law: Tourism to the Chernobyl Site, 46 N.C. J. INT'L L. 27 (2020). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol46/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nuclear Semiotics, Atomic Tourism, and International Law: Tourism to the Chernobyl Site Cannon Lane† I. Introduction ................................................................. 27 II. Classification and Regulation of Radioactive Waste... 31 III. International Law and Atomic Tourism ...................... 34 A. Atomic Tourism and the Opening of Chernobyl as a Tourist Attraction ............................................... 37 B. Nuclear Watchdogs and Tourism to Radioactive Sites ....................................................................... 41 C. Organizations Governing the Disposal and Safety of Radioactive Waste and Radioactive Sites ........ 44 D. Recommendations for Possible International Solutions to the Problem of Nuclear Semiotics .... 46 IV. Conclusion ................................................................... 48 “[A] misfortune has befallen us - the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. It has painfully affected Soviet people and caused the anxiety of the international public. For the first time ever we encountered in reality such a sinister force as nuclear energy that has escaped control.” - Mikhail S. -
Fires in Ukraine in the Exclusion Zone Around the Chernobyl Power Plant: Point Position
Logo IRSN April 15, 2020 avril 2020 Information note Fires in Ukraine in the exclusion zone around the Chernobyl power plant: Point position Since the publication of our previous information note on April 7, 2020, fires in Ukraine have spread nearby the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. Following numerous questions received by our Institute about their radiological consequences, which, according to Ukrainian authorities, which have now been brought under control, this note provides an assessment of the possible radiological impacts for the firefighters as well as for the inhabitants of Kiev. It also reviews cesium 137 (137Cs) airborne activity levels likely to be detected in France due to the transport of contaminated air masses. 1/ Current situation as of April 15, 2020 Forest fires broke out in Ukraine about ten days ago in a territory heavily contaminated by the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident. These fires reached the exclusion zone and the surrounding environment (about 1 km) of the nuclear power plant from April 8, 2020 (see Fig. 1). Nearly 400 fire-fighters and 90 specialized aerial and terrestrial vehicles, including planes and water- bomber helicopters, have been mobilized for more than a week for the control of the fires. According to some estimates, the burned area reached about 20,000 ha. Ukrainian authorities said earlier this week that "the efforts of the fire- fighters and the rain have reduced the forest fire in the Chernobyl exclusion zone". They assured Tuesday, April 14, 2020 in the morning that the risks of fire spreading were now limited to isolated or smoldering fires. At the end of April 14, 2020, the Ukrainian authorities indicated that the fires were under control. -
A REASSESSMENT David R. Marples1 Introduction This Paper
CHERNOBYL: A REASSESSMENT David R. Marples1 Introduction This paper returns to a topic that has virtually disappeared from international discussion outside scientific circles: the Chernobyl disaster of 1986. It forms part of a new study that attempts a reassessment of the events at Chernobyl as we approach the 20th anniversary. That anniversary will come four years after the closure of the station by the Ukrainian authorities, but also at a time when nuclear power still forms an important component of the Ukrainian energy program. One reason for a new investigation is the release of over 120 primary documents by the Ukrainian branch of the KGB.2 These documents serve several useful purposes: they allow the observer to differentiate between supposition and fact in several instances, corroborating events that earlier were based—at least in part—on speculation. They allow one to perceive at first hand the workings of the Soviet structure, and specifically the relationship between the KGB and the Government Commission appointed to deal with Chernobyl. But perhaps above all, the newly released materials provide a much clearer and more composite picture of the flaws of the Soviet nuclear power industry and the way these defects were concealed from the public by official images of the operation of nuclear power. This paper cites selective documents for the reason of lack of space. The Chernobyl accident has been the subject of numerous accounts of varying quality since its occurrence. They include official reports conducted on behalf of the International Atomic Energy (IAEA, 1991, 1997) and World Health Organization (WHO, 1995); Soviet and post-Soviet accounts (Sklyarov, 1991, G. -
The Ukrainian Weekly 1993, No.44
www.ukrweekly.com iNSIDE: • Karbovanets goes Into free fall — page 2. • Zbigniew Brzezinski on Ukraine's significance — page 8. • Encyclopedia of Ukraine gala in photos — centerfold. THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY Published by the Ukrainian National Association inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXI No. 44 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, OCTOBER 31, 1993 50 cents UOC enfhrones Patriarch Volodymyr Ukraine assures U.S. secretary of state of commitment to nuclear-free status echoed Ukrainian President Leonid Seeks billions in aid, Kravchuk at an afternoon meeting, security guarantees explaining that ratification is in the hands of the legislature. by Marta Kolomayets The Parliament, according to Speaker Kyyiv Press Bureau Ivan Pliushch, Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Dmytro Pavlychko KYYIV - Ukraine's leaders told U.S. and Defense Committee Chairman Secretary of State Warren Christopher on Valentyn Lemish, will ratify START I, Monday, October 25, that they are com perhaps by the end of the year. mitted to a non-nuclear future, but need billions of dollars and security guarantees "But Ukraine cannot ratify both START from the West to achieve this status. and the NPT at the same time," said Mr. "The only question is timing," Mr. Pavlychko, referring to U.S. demands and Christopher told reporters who wanted to to the executive branch's attempt to pre know when the world's third largest sent the two treaties as one package. 'This nuclear power would give up its arsenal. is a two-stage process. Otherwise, we would be in one moment a non-nuclear The secretary of state said at a news nation.