Bystroye Canal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bystroye Canal Bystroye Canal (Documentary research) 2 3 Content The Danube Delta....................................................................................................................6 The Danube River....................................................................................................................7 The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve - brief presentation.....................................................7 The international recognition of the Danube delta Biosphere Reserve .................................10 Biological diversity ...............................................................................................................10 The Danube Delta Soils .........................................................................................................10 The Delta Vegetation.............................................................................................................11 The Danube Delta Fauna .......................................................................................................13 Ichtyofauna ........................................................................................................................13 Avifauna ............................................................................................................................14 Mammals...........................................................................................................................14 Use of the natural resources..................................................................................................14 Reopening of the Danube-Black Sea deep-water navigable waterway.................................15 Introduction. The danube as the european life-line ...........................................................15 The economic and social rationale of the project..............................................................16 Technical characteristics of the project .............................................................................17 Possible environmental impact ..........................................................................................22 Environmental impact in a transborder context.................................................................24 Designed projects characterization....................................................................................25 1.1 The necessity for a deep water navigable canal to be constructed in the Ukrainian sector of the Danube Delta...........................................................................25 Technological exploitation (navigation) conditions required by the construction of the deep water navigable canal and the exploitation requirements provided by the project ........................................................................................................................28 Comparative evaluation of the potential choices and argumentation with respect to the selection of the examined choices related to the construction of a deep water navigable canal..........................................................................................................29 Characterization of the Solomonov - Jebrianovsk gulf choice related to the construction of the deep water navigable canal ( choice 1 )......................................30 Utilization of the choice related to the construction of a deep water navigable canal on the Bystroye channel (Choice 2) ..........................................................................31 Comparative evaluation of the impact factors of Choice 1 and 2 .............................35 Environmental and impact elements .....................................................................................37 2.1 Natural environment characterization ...............................................................37 2.1.1 Flora.................................................................................................................37 2.1.2 The insects .......................................................................................................39 4 2.1.3 The aquatic fauna ............................................................................................41 2.1.4 The amphibious and the terrestrial vertebrates................................................45 2.1.5 Birds ................................................................................................................48 Environmental and assesment issues.....................................................................................51 3.1 Characterization of the social environment and assessment on the impact elements affecting it ......................................................................................................51 3.2 General assessment with respect to the impact of the designed project on the natural environment.......................................................................................................52 Conclusions ...........................................................................................................................53 Bystroye report ......................................................................................................................58 Impact ....................................................................................................................................67 Local pollution...................................................................................................................67 Fish Communities..............................................................................................................67 Bird Communities .............................................................................................................68 Animal and plant communities..........................................................................................70 The Human Communities..................................................................................................71 Existing Transport Ways .......................................................................................................71 Bystroye alternative ...............................................................................................................71 Navigation versus biodiversity..............................................................................................76 Navigation versus delta dynamics .........................................................................................77 The need for compensation of ecological damage ................................................................78 The need for transboundary cooperation...............................................................................80 Actions...................................................................................................................................80 Facts...................................................................................................................................80 Consequences of the Bystroye project on the Danube Delta Ecosystem..............................81 Demands in reaction to the Ukrainian project development .................................................82 Multilateral and bilateral regulations in the field of environmental protection relevant to the Bystroye channel...................................................................................................................86 Bibliography..........................................................................................................................91 5 The Danube Delta The Danube is the single delta in the world declared a biosphere reserve. The international network of the biosphere reserve totals 352 km in 87 countries. Geographic units: - The Danube river, from Galati city to Sulina town; - The Isaccea - Tulcea floodplain; - The saline plain Murighiol; - The Danube Delta; - The Lake complex Razim-Sinoe; - The black sea coastline, from the Chilia branch mouth to Midia Cape, till 20 depths. Total area: 2 · 5800 km - 2,505 from the total territory of Romania-on the 22nd position in the world and the third in Europe - after Volga and Cuban - one of the worldwide largest wet zones, a water birds habitat. On the 8th position according Ramsar convention which includes 600 wet zones; · area Natural Museum of Biodiversity, which includes 30 types of ecosystems; 2 · the greatest reedbed expenses worldwide 1560 km . The Danube Biosphere Reserve Authority (DDRB) The DDRB was established by the Romanian Government in 1990, a decision confirmed by the Romanian Parliament through law 82 of 1993. The natural patrimony of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve is managed by DDRB, for biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. The main objectives of the DDRB are, as follows: - to provide sustainable measures and protected of the biological diversity; - to enforce the measures for ecological restoration; - to asses the state of the natural resources, the potential for its use, according the capacity of support and the ecosystem’s capacity of support; - to issue licences, for economic activity; - to support the research and the international cooperation activities; - to organize information and ecological awareness activities. 6 In 2000, the DDRB received the European Council Diploma for Protected areas. The Danube River - The Danube River is the second longest in Europe (the first being the Volga River) : · 2840 km length, 81700 km2 · catchments basin - Danube River
Recommended publications
  • On the Geomorphologic and Geologic Evolution of The
    N. Panin - On the Geomorphologicand Geologicevolution of the Nver Danube- Black Sea lnteractionZone ONTHE GEOMORPHOLOGIC AND GEOLOGIC EVOLUTION OF THE RIVERDANUBE . BLACKSEA INTERACTION ZONE NicolaePRxttrt NationalInstitute of MarineGeology and Geo-ecology- GEoEcoMAR 23-25,D. OnciulStr., 70318 Bucharest, Tel/Fax: +fi-1-252.25.94, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The presentpaper aims at describingof the evolutionof the mouthzones of three main distributariesof the DanubeDelta system:the northernbranch - Chilia,a medianone - Sulinaand a southernbranch - St. George(Sf.Gheorghe). These main distributaries areresponsible for the formationand the developmentof differentstages of the DanubeDelta. The descriptionis basedon the complex studyof the.entireDanube Delta edifice by aerophotogrammetric,geomorphologic, sedimentologic-geologic, biostratigraphic means, as ''C wellas by datationof deltaicdeposits. The mainstages of developmentthrough which the DanubeDelta reached the presentday aspectinclude:(1)theDanubeGulf andthe"DanubeBlockedDelta"--12-1 1 k.yr.B.P.; (2)lnitial Letea-CaraormanSpit, 11,700-9,800 yr.B. P.; (3) St.GeorgeI Deita,9,000-7,200 yr. B. P.; (4) SulinaDelta, 7 ,2OO-2,000 yr. B P.;(5)St, George ll Deltaand ChiliaDelta, 2,800 yr.B.P.-present;(6) SecondaryCosna-Sinoie Delta, 3,550-2,500 yr B.P. Detaileddescription of the succesivephases of developmentof the mentionedstages is given. 'oC Key words: geomorphologicand geologicevolution, deltaic deposits, phases of development, datation,Danube Delta system. INTRODUCTION THE "BLOCKEDDANUBE DELTA'' The river-sea interaction zones have very ln the period12-11 k.y. BP, when the level of complexdynamic, depositional, biogeo-chemical the Black Sea had reachedthe present level or, and eco-structuralcharacteristics. Geomorpho- probably,had even exceededit with few meters, logicallythese zones are representedmostly by the present area of the Danube Delta was estuariesand deltas.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Chilia Lobes of the Danube Delta
    G Model ANCENE-47; No. of Pages 6 Anthropocene xxx (2014) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Anthropocene jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ancene Short communication Evolution of Chilia lobes of the Danube delta: Reorganization of deltaic processes under cultural pressures a,b, c, Florin Filip *, Liviu Giosan ** a Department of Geography, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania b FAD Smart Technology SRL, Str. Olari, 7, Bucharest 024056, Romania c Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: The growth of Chilia deltaic lobes reflects a drastic reorganization of the Danube delta that accompanied Received 12 June 2014 its rapid expansion in the late Holocene. Using new cores collected at the apices of the two older Chilia Received in revised form 20 July 2014 lobes, together with historical maps and satellite photos, we find that a partial avulsion since 1500 Accepted 23 July 2014 years BP led to a gradual rejuvenation of the Chilia distributary. This process led to the successive infilling of a lake and a lagoon and subsequently to the construction of an open coast lobe at the Black Sea coast. Keywords: The Chilia branch became the largest Danube distributary, reaching its maximum sediment load in the Deltas last 300 years as the southernmost St. George branch lost its previous dominance. Here, we propose that Avulsion the intensive deforestation of Danube’s lower watershed leading to this delta reorganization has Land use historical cultural causes: an increase in sheep and timber demand associated to the Ottoman Empire Ottoman Empire Columbian Exchange expansion in Eastern Europe followed by the adoption of maize agriculture as a result of the Columbian Exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Drainage Basin of the Black Sea
    165 CHAPTER 5 DRAINAGE BASIN OF THE BLACK SEA This chapter deals with the assessment of transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwa- ters, as well as selected Ramsar Sites and other wetlands of transboundary importance, which are located in the basin of the Black Sea. Assessed transboundary waters in the drainage basin of the Black Sea Transboundary groundwaters Ramsar Sites/wetlands of Basin/sub-basin(s) Recipient Riparian countries Lakes in the basin within the basin transboundary importance Rezovska/Multudere Black Sea BG, TR Danube Black Sea AT, BA, BG, Reservoirs Silurian-Cretaceous (MD, RO, Lower Danube Green Corridor and HR, CZ, DE, Iron Gate I and UA), Q,N1-2,Pg2-3,Cr2 (RO, UA), Delta Wetlands (BG, MD, RO, UA) HU, MD, ME, Iron Gate II, Dobrudja/Dobrogea Neogene- RO, RS, SI, Lake Neusiedl Sarmatian (BG-RO), Dobrudja/ CH, UA Dobrogea Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous (BG-RO), South Western Backa/Dunav aquifer (RS, HR), Northeast Backa/ Danube -Tisza Interfluve or Backa/Danube-Tisza Interfluve aquifer (RS, HU), Podunajska Basin, Zitny Ostrov/Szigetköz, Hanság-Rábca (HU), Komarnanska Vysoka Kryha/Dunántúli – középhegység északi rész (HU) - Lech Danube AT, DE - Inn Danube AT, DE, IT, CH - Morava Danube AT, CZ, SK Floodplains of the Morava- Dyje-Danube Confluence --Dyje Morava AT, CZ - Raab/Rába Danube AT, HU Rába shallow aquifer, Rába porous cold and thermal aquifer, Rába Kőszeg mountain fractured aquifer, Günser Gebirge Umland, Günstal, Hügelland Raab Ost, Hügelland Raab West, Hügelland Rabnitz, Lafnitztal, Pinkatal 1, Pinkatal 2, Raabtal,
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of the Strategic Action Plan for the Rehabilitation and Protection of the Black Sea
    Implementation of the Strategic Action Plan for the Rehabilitation and Protection of the Black Sea (2002-2007) A report by the Commission on the Protection of the BLack Sea Against Pollution © 2009, Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution ISBN 978-9944-245-35-7 For bibliographic purposes this document may be cited as: BSC, 2009. Implementation of the Strategic Action Plan for the Rehabilitation and Protection of the Black Sea (2002-22007). Publications of the Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution (BSC), 2009-11, Istanbul, Turkey, 252 pp. This document has been prepared with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Permanent Secretariat of the Black Sea Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution. Cover design: Nilufer Akpinar Cover image: The image used on the cover of this book is provided by the NASA's Visible Earth website at: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/8000/8817/ BlackSea_AMO_2008156_lrg.jpg Published by Referans Çeviri Hizmetleri, Yazýlým ve Yayýncýlýk Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Mitigation Measures Designed to Minimise the Likely Adverse Transboundary Environmental Impact of the Project
    112 6. MITIGATION MEASURES DESIGNED TO MINIMISE THE LIKELY ADVERSE TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE PROJECT Table 6.1 presents a suite of environmental mitigation measures included in the detailed design for the full-scale development of the Navigation Route Project. All relevant details and description of these measures can be found in the EIA Report [1]. Table 6.1. A Suite of Planned Environmental Protection and Mitigation Measures Category Description Resource- • The siting of riparian dumpsites in the scarcely used, bush and reed overgrown areas of low Saving ecological that are waterlogged and/or periodically flooded. • The restoration of dumpsites, including improvements in soil fertility and water regime (in order to restore original agricultural uses). • The environmentally reasonable siting of marine dumpsite in a manner that facilitates the minimization of damage to bottom communities, safe disposal of dredging spoils, and prevention/avoidance of re-contamination of estuarine and coastal waters. • The provision of floating navigation signs in order to avoid the use of riparian land for the installation of these signs. Protective • The provision of engineered structures combining both navigation and environmental protection functions: ¾ Flow guide dam at the bifurcation of the Bystre and Starostambulske Branches, designed to regulate the distribution of river flow between the branches and compensate any potential transboundary impact on the hydrological regime of the Starostambulske Branch; ¾ Riverbank strengthening measures designed to prevent/avoid bank erosion along the navigation route; ¾ Retaining dam along the seaward access channel, designed to minimize siltation processes caused by sea storms; ¾ Settling basins and on-site dikes established at the riparian dumpsites in order to clarify generated drainage flow and minimize water contamination in the Danube River.
    [Show full text]
  • General 29 April 2011
    United Nations ECE /MP.WAT/WG.2/2011/13 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 29 April 2011 English only Economic Commission for Europe Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Working Group on Monitoring and Assessment Twelth meeting Geneva, 2–4 May 2011 Item 5 (b) of the provisional agenda Assessment of the status of transboundary waters in the UNECE 1 region: assessment of transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwaters in the Caucasus. Assessment of transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwaters discharging into the Black Sea 2 Note prepared by the secretariat* Summary This document was prepared pursuant to decisions taken by the Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes at its fifth session (Geneva, 10–12 November 2009) (ECE/MP.WAT/29, para. 81 (e)), and by the Working Group on Monitoring and Assessment at its eleventh meeting (Geneva, 6–7 July 2010), requesting the secretariat to finalize the sub regional assessments of South-Eastern Europe, Caucasus, Eastern and Northern Europe and Central Asia for the second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters in time for its submission to the Seventh “Environment for Europe” Ministerial Conference (Astana, 21–23 September 2011). This document contains the draft assessments of the different transboundary rivers, lakes 1 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2 This document was submitted for publication without formal editing. * The present document has been submitted on the present date due to late receipt of inputs by concerned countries and resource constraints in the secretariat.
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Invasive Species at the Romanian Black Sea Coast – Present and Perspectives
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © Décembre Vol. LIII pp. 443–467 «Grigore Antipa» 2010 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-010-0031-6 ALIEN INVASIVE SPECIES AT THE ROMANIAN BLACK SEA COAST – PRESENT AND PERSPECTIVES MARIUS SKOLKA, CRISTINA PREDA Abstract. Using literature data and personal field observations we present an overview of aquatic animal alien invasive species at the Romanian Black Sea coast, including freshwater species encountered in this area. We discuss records, pathways of introduction, origin and impact on native communities for some of these alien invasive species. In perspective, we draw attention on the potential of other alien species to become invasive in the study area. Résumé. Ce travail présente le résultat d’une synthèse effectuée en utilisant la littérature de spécialité et des observations et études personnelles concernant les espèces invasives dans la région côtière roumaine de la Mer Noire. On présente des aspects concernant les différentes catégories d’espèces invasives – stabilisées, occasionnelles et incertes – des écosystèmes marins et dulcicoles. L’origine géographique, l’impact sur les communautés d’organismes natifs, l’impact économique et les perspectives de ce phénomène sont aussi discutés. Key words: alien invasive species, Black Sea, Romania. INTRODUCTION Invasive species are one of the great problems of the modern times. Globalization, increase of commercial trades and climatic changes make invasive species a general threat for all kinds of terrestrial, freshwater or marine ecosystems (Mooney, 2005; Perrings et al., 2010). Perhaps polar areas or the deep seas are the only ecosystems not affected by this global phenomenon. Black Sea is a particular marine basin, with special hydrological characteristics, formed 10,000 years BP, when Mediterranean waters flowed to the Black Sea over the Bosporus strait.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of the Strategic Action Plan for the Rehabilitation and Protection of the Black Sea 2002 – 2007
    Implementation of the Strategic Action Plan for the Rehabilitation and Protection of the Black Sea 2002 – 2007 A report by the Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution i ii Table of Contents Table of Contents .....................................................................................................................ii Table of Figures......................................................................................................................vii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 2 2. Challenges ...................................................................................................................... 3 3. The Basis for Cooperative Action................................................................................ 6 Principles................................................................................................................................... 6 Wider Cooperation .............................................................................................................. 12 4. Policy Actions............................................................................................................... 15 Reduction of Pollution ............................................................................................................ 15 Land based sources of pollution.......................................................................................... 15 Rivers.....................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Romania Bystroe Canal
    MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND WATER MANAGEMENT DANUBE DELTA NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 165, Babadag Street, 820112 Tulcea, Romania Tel: (+40-240) 531520/524546; Fax: (+40-240) 533547 E-mail:<[email protected]> Bystroe canal Ukraine Romania DOCUMENTATION ON THE LIKELY SIGNIFICANT TRANSBOUNDARY IMPACT OF THE UKRAINIAN DEEP-WATER NAVIGATION CANAL DANUBE-BLACK SEA IN THE CONTEXT OF ESPOO CONVENTION, 1991 Author: Dr. Mircea Staras Danube Delta National Institute Tulcea, Romania February 2005 CONTENT page 1 Part I. 2 Considerations 1 3 Statements and argumentations 2 4 References 5 5 Part II. Description of the project 7 6 Annex 1. Supporting statements 9 7 Annex 2. Migratory birds passing Bystroe area 23 8 Annex 3. Possible mitigation measures 32 DOCUMENTATION ON THE LIKELY SIGNIFICANT TRANSBOUNDARY IMPACT AS A RESULT OF THE UKRAINIAN DEEP-WATER NAVIGATION CANAL DANUBE- BLACK SEA, IN THE CONTEXT OF ESPOO CONVENTION, 1991 by Dr. Mircea Staras, Danube Delta National Institute, Tulcea, Romania Part I Considerations Aim: To support Romanian expert’s opinion within the Inquiry Commission of the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (Espoo, 1991). The role of the Inquiry Commission is to advise on whether the project „Danube-Black Sea Deep Water Navigation Canal in the Ukrainian sector of the Danube Delta” is likely to have a significant adverse transboundary impact. Provisions of the ESPOO Convention Convention’s text: Impact: "Impact" means any effect caused by a proposed activity on the environment including human health and safety, flora, fauna, soil, air, water, climate, landscape and historical monuments or other physical structures or the interaction among these factors; it also includes effects on cultural heritage or socio-economic conditions resulting from alterations to those factors”.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Sea Red Data Book
    The designation employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the publishers concerning the legal status of any country or territory, or of its authorities or concerning the frontiers of any country or territory. The opinions expressed in this publicaton are those of the individual writers and do not necessarily represent the views of the GEF, UNDP or UNOPS. Copyright © 1999. Published by the United Nations Office for Project Services in the context of a project funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the Publisher. BLACK SEA RED DATA BOOK Edited by Henri J. Dumont (Ghent, Belgium) Website Editor: V.O. Mamaev (Istanbul, Turkey) Scientific Coordinator: Y.P. Zaitsev (Odessa, Ukraine) EDITOR'S PREFACE This "paper form" of the Black Sea Red Data book is not an exact copy of its predecessor, the Black Sea Red Data web site. In addition to polishing the language and style, I added a number of illustrations, and some distribution maps were also redrawn. Contentwise, I was struck by the high level of commitment of the numerous scientists associated with this project. Inevitably, there were differences in approach and in the level of thoroughness between contributions. By far the most detailed species sheets were those contributed by the ornithologists, while some of the most synthetic ones were found among the botanical entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Trace Element Contamination in the Arms of the Danube Delta (Romania/Ukraine): Current State of Knowledge and Future Needs Davide A.L
    Trace element contamination in the arms of the Danube Delta (Romania/Ukraine): Current state of knowledge and future needs Davide A.L. Vignati, Dan Secrieru, Yuliya I. Bogatova, Janusz Dominik, Régis Céréghino, Nikolai A. Berlinsky, Gheorghe Oaie, Stefan Szobotka, Adrian Stanica To cite this version: Davide A.L. Vignati, Dan Secrieru, Yuliya I. Bogatova, Janusz Dominik, Régis Céréghino, et al.. Trace element contamination in the arms of the Danube Delta (Romania/Ukraine): Current state of knowledge and future needs. Journal of Environmental Management, Elsevier, 2013, vol. 125, pp. 169-178. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.007. hal-00908616 HAL Id: hal-00908616 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00908616 Submitted on 25 Nov 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Open Archive TOULOUSE Archive Ouverte (OATAO) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author-deposited version published in : http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/ Eprints ID : 10209 To link to this article : doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.007 URL : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.007 To cite this version : Vignati, Davide A.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Examples from the Danube Delta
    MORPHODYNAMICS OF THE DANUBE DELTA 1 RIVER DELTA MORPHODYNAMICS: EXAMPLES FROM THE DANUBE DELTA LIVIU GIOSAN AND JEFFREY P. DONNELLY Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected]) EMIL VESPREMEANU Department of Geography, Bucharest University, Bucharest, Romania JANOK P. BHATTACHARYA AND CORNEL OLARIU Geosciences Department, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083-0688, U.S.A. AND FRANK S. BUONAIUTO Marine Sciences Research Center, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794, U.S.A ABSTRACT: The Danube, with its mouths at the Black Sea, has been economically and strategically one of the most important rivers in Europe; consequently, its delta has been studied since the Nineteenth Century. Although many morphological and sedimentological aspects of the Danube delta are well understood, its late Quaternary evolution remains ambiguous. This uncertainty reflects in part the complexity of the sea-level variations and water-chemistry changes related to the periodic isolation of the Black Sea during eustatic lowstands, but also a lack of accurate age control of the deltaic deposits. On the basis of a review of existing radiocarbon dates, we propose that the development of the delta at the open coast started approximately 6,000–5,500 14C years ago, much later than the 9,000 14C years BP previously suggested. Morphodynamics of the open-coast Danube delta has been determined largely by the interaction between fluvial deposition and the strong southward wave-induced longshore transport. Morphological and facies asymmetry displayed by the marine lobes of the Danube delta indicate that a strong and sustained southward-directed longshore transport has been a persistent process along the delta shore.
    [Show full text]