DOCSLIB.ORG

ASSUMPTION 21 Above All and Beyond All Other Arguments Is the “Pragmatic” Argument, Viz., That History Confirms the Validity of the SDA Explanation of the Two Time

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THIS IS A DOCUMENT IN PROGRESS! REVISIONS ARE BEING MADE ON A REGULAR BASIS!! Latest Revision Monday, May 19, 2014 AN EXAMINATION OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST INTERPRETATION OF TWO TIME PROPHECIES IN THE BOOK OF DANIEL - THE 2300 DAYS OF DANIEL 8 AND THE 70 WEEKS OF DANIEL 9. ASSUMPTION 21 Above all and beyond all other arguments is the “pragmatic” argument, viz., that history confirms the validity of the SDA explanation of the two time BY FRANK BASTEN NOVEMBER, 1990 copyright F.A.Basten, 1990 Assumption 21 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Purpose of This Assumption ............................................................................... 2 The Method of This Assumption and its Associated Problems. ................................ 4 a. Smith. ............................................................................................................... 7 b. Spangler. .......................................................................................................... 7 Shea. .................................................................................................................... 8 Ford. .................................................................................................................... 8 Gerhard Pfandl ..................................................................................................... 9 The Chronological Platform of SDA Historicism ................................................. 9 457 BC: The commandment to rebuild and restore Jerusalem .......................... 9 27 AD “Until the Anointed One.” ................................................................... 12 31 AD “Messiah shall be cut off.” .................................................................. 14 34 AD The Stoning of Stephen. ....................................................................... 15 538 AD The little horn has the power ............................................................. 16 1798 AD The little horn shall be broken. ........................................................ 17 August 11, 1840 The End of the Ottoman Empire. .......................................... 22 October 22, 1844 AD “The hour of his judgment is come.” .......................... 40 Establishing the October 22 date. ................................................................... 44 Summary of this Chronological Review. ......................................................... 48 The Social Construction of History..................................................................... 51 The Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 52 Bibliography .............................................................................................................. 53 Appendix ................................................................................................................... 57 Material associated with 457 B.C ....................................................................... 57 Kenneth Richards (son of H.M.S. Richards) ....................................................... 57 Material Associated with 408 B.C. ..................................................................... 59 Material Associated with A.D. 27 ....................................................................... 59 Material Associated with A.D. 31 ....................................................................... 59 Material Associated with A.D. 34. ...................................................................... 59 Material Associated with 1798. .......................................................................... 59 Material Associated with August 11, 1840 The End of the Ottoman Empire. ...... 59 The History behind the Incident in 1840. ........................................................ 92 Official British Government Publications ..................................................... 111 The New Cambridge Modern History – ChXVI –The Mediterranean ............ 133 New Cambridge Modern History –The Crimean War, Vol. X., pp.468-492. .. 146 Material Associated with 1844. ........................................................................ 151 The Day of Atonement in 1844: Was it October 22, or September 23? .......... 151 Establishing the 1843 date. ........................................................................... 151 Day of Atonement of the Karaite Jews in 1844 by Robert K. Sanders ............ 152 When Was the "Day of Atonement in 1844"? by Robert K. Sanders .......... 156 A Counter-Argument by Bob Pickle. ............................................................. 160 How Shea uses the Babylonian Calendar to justify October 22. .................... 164 The Purpose of This Assumption This is the first of two extremely persistent assumptions used to support the SDA interpretation of the two time periods in Daniel and the principle behind their interpretation. This assumption, and its supplement in Assumption 23, is useful for SDA historicists when the weakness of their position is highlighted. It enables them to believe in the validity of their interpretation even in the face of insurmountable evidence showing up the fallacies of the SDA position. It cannot be described as irrational; it is © Frank Basten 1990 Version Date: May 19, 2014 Assumption 21 3 probably better to call it an arational assumption, in the sense that no logic can be used to address the shortcomings in this assumption. It is beyond reason. It is blind and will cling to the traditional teachings of the SDA church Řthough the heavens fall.ř It summons their memories of historical events that they feel endorse the SDA position and they take stock in these. It believes the SDA position is correct even though valid objections are raised that have no answer from SDA historicists. These memories will encourage the hope that God will provide answers to these objections in time and that the old positions will stand. For years many of us have looked at the Book of Revelation from strictly the "historical-prophetic" overlay. This overlay has given us much confidence as we have looked at the great prophetic waymarks down through history. http://www.streamofhealing.org/Devotionals/index.htm The type of thinking associated with this assumption are as follows: ŖIt does not matter that you bring arguments to show the traditional SDA teaching on the 2300 days and the seventy weeks is incorrect. When all is said and done, history, the great arbiter of truth, has confirmed the SDA position, and no matter what you say or try and prove, these great historical facts remain.ŗ ŖYou cannot deny the decrees to rebuild Jerusalem and the temple starting in 457 BC; ŖYou cannot deny the coming of Jesus to be anointed by the Holy Spirit in AD 27; ŖYou cannot deny the death of Christ on Nisan 14, 31 AD; ŖYou cannot deny the historicity of the stoning of Stephen in 34 AD; ŖYou cannot deny the legal supremacy of the papal powers beginning in March, 538 AD; ŖYou cannot deny the persecution of Christians by the Roman pagan and papal power throughout the 1260 years up to 1798; ŖYou cannot deny the 1260 years ended exactly to the month, in February, 1798 with the removal of the papal power from its seat in 1798 AD; ŖYou cannot deny that Litchřs prophecy concerning the Ottoman empire was fulfilled to the day on 11th August, 1840; ŖYou cannot deny that the ending of the 2300 year prophecy in 1844 AD and the beginning of a new phase of ministry in heaven was heralded by religious movements both in the Old World and the New World, in accordance with prophecy.ŗ ŖThese great historical facts cannot be changed or undone. They are anchored in time forever as beacons of light, testifying of the veracity of the predictions they are associated with. To deny these facts is to deny the hand of God in history.ŗ This assumption is extremely important in the SDAřs reconstruction of history in that it provides a basis for sense of divine endorsement of the SDA interpretation of these time prophecies. These events in history have a strength in themselves transcending any reasoning to the contrary. In the words of Clifford Goldstein, ŖItřs as solid as world history, as solid as Christ, as solid as the math itself,ŗ (2003, p.112) 1 1 The following statement by Goldstein on the Adventist interpretation of Rome in prophecy expresses this sentiment best: ŖThe Adventist position regarding Rome as the little horn is as firm as world history itself. No matter how politically incorrect this view, we canřt waffle here. Fortunately, we donřt need to.ŗ (2003, p.43) Note: The Adventist position is as firm as world history itself!!! © Frank Basten 1990 Version Date: May 19, 2014 Assumption 21 4 In this paper, I will look at the claims for the major historical dates in the SDA chronography of world history from a prophetic point of view. I will then examine the empirical validity of each of those major events in history and then finally draw a conclusion together. The Method of This Assumption and its Associated Problems. Seventh-day Adventists have created a history of themselves that portrays them as Godřs remnantŔhis special people ordained with a special missionŔand this remnancy is also illustrated in the perspective of a Řtorchbearerř carrying on the torch from other churches. The flip side of this view is that the other churches, cited by SDA histories as being forebearers of aspects of SDA doctrine and teaching, no longer carry the torch. Dr Geoffrey Paxton, an Australian Anglican ordained minister and
Recommended publications
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
  • Pope Francis and the Challenges of Inter-Civilization Diplomacy

    Pope Francis and the Challenges of Inter-Civilization Diplomacy

    ARTIGO Pope Francis and the challenges of inter-civilization diplomacy O Papa Francisco e os desafios de uma diplomacia inter-civilizacional http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201500204 BORIS VUKIĆEVIĆ* Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. 58 (2): 65-79 [2015] Introduction The Holy See, as the governing body of the Roman Catholic Church, has been a major player in international politics for many centuries. It has survived many attacks and persecutions, and has remained recognized as the subject of international law and international relations in the contemporary world, which makes it unique among religious organizations. Throughout its long history, the Holy See has survived turmoil. First, in its very beginning, the Roman Empire persecuted Christianity, forcing the early Church to be a clandestine organization whose first leaders were either executed or incarcerated. Then, after the Church was recognized, its status significantly improved. In 754 the Donation of Pepin founded the Papal State, making the Bishop of Rome - now known as the pope - the ruler of the independent state. Still, the papacy faced a new set of troubles. Long lasting conflict with the Holy Roman emperors and a power struggle with the kings of France forced the Holy See to temporarily move its seat to Avignon. During its time in Avignon, the Church did not have dominance in European affairs as it did during much of the rest of the medieval period. The Age of Enlightenment brought even tougher times for the Catholic Church, and Pope Pius VII was even arrested and humiliated by Napoleon at the pinnacle of Napoleon’s military might.
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese

    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese

    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
  • The Wars of the Roses

    The Wars of the Roses

    Unit 2: Roman Church and the Rise of the Papal State © Jason Asbell, 2019 Unit 2: Roman Church and the Rise of the Papal State © Jason Asbell, 2019 © Jason Asbell, 2019 © Jason Asbell, 2019 © Jason Asbell, 2019 SW India evangelized 1st Cent. AD Manicheanism was a Gnostic belief that was semi-Christian, but believed in a dualistic cosmology in which Good and Evil were equally powerful – this belief system lasted a long time…eventually almost all Manichean believers assimilated into either more mainstream versions of Christianity, Buddhism, or Islam © Jason Asbell, 2019 Unit 2: Roman Church and the Rise of the Papal State © Jason Asbell, 2019 St. Miltiades: First African Pope. First pope after the end of the persecution of Christians through the Edict of Milan (313 AD). Presided over the Lateran council of 313. St. Sylvester I: 1st Council of Nicaea (325). Built St. John Lateran, Santa Croce in Gerusalemme and Old St. Peter's Basilica. Stated recipient of Donation of Constantine (later shown to be a forgery) Papal Reigns: St. Miltiades to St. Gregory I "the Great" MILTIADES INNOCENT I FELIX III (II?) JOHN II (2 JULY 311 – 10 JAN 314) (21 DEC 401 – 12 MARCH 417) (13 MARCH 483 – 1 MARCH 492) (2 JAN 533 – 8 MAY 535) MARK BONIFACE I ANASTASIUS II VIGILIUS (336) (28 DEC 418 – 4 SEP 422) (24 NOV 496 – 19 NOV 498) (29 MARCH 537 – 7 JUNE 555) LIBERIUS SIXTUS III HORMISDAS JOHN III (17 MAY 352 – 24 SEP 366) (31 JULY 432 – 18 AUG 440) (20 JULY 514 – 6 AUG 523) (17 JULY 561 – 13 JULY 574) SIRICIUS HILARIUS FELIX IV PELAGIUS II (17 DEC 384 – 26 NOV
  • Athens' Domain

    Athens' Domain

    Athens’ Domain: The Loss of Naval Supremacy and an Empire Keegan Laycock Acknowledgements This paper has a lot to owe to the support of Dr. John Walsh. Without his encouragement, guid- ance, and urging to come on a theoretically educational trip to Greece, this paper would be vastly diminished in quality, and perhaps even in existence. I am grateful for the opportunity I have had to present it and the insight I have gained from the process. Special thanks to the editors and or- ganizers of Canta/ἄειδε for their own patience and persistence. %1 For the Athenians, the sea has been a key component of culture, economics, and especial- ly warfare. The Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC) displayed how control of the waves was vital for victory. This was not wholly apparent at the start of the conflict. The Peloponnesian League was militarily led by Sparta who was the greatest land power in Greece; to them naval warfare was excessive. Athens, as the head of the Delian League, was the greatest sea power in Greece whose strengths lay in their navy. However, through a combination of factors, Athens lost control of the sea and lost the war despite being the superior naval power at the war’s outset. Ultimately, Athens lost because they were unable to maintain strong naval authority. The geographic position of Athens and many of its key resources ensured land-based threats made them vulnerable de- spite their naval advantage. Athens also failed to exploit their naval supremacy as they focused on land-based wars in Sicily while the Peloponnesian League built up a rivaling navy of its own.
  • Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture

    Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture

    ANTONIJE SHKOKLJEV SLAVE NIKOLOVSKI - KATIN PREHISTORY CENTRAL BALKANS CRADLE OF AEGEAN CULTURE Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture By Antonije Shkokljev Slave Nikolovski – Katin Translated from Macedonian to English and edited By Risto Stefov Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2013 by Antonije Shkokljev, Slave Nikolovski – Katin & Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 Index Index........................................................................................................3 COMMON HISTORY AND FUTURE ..................................................5 I - GEOGRAPHICAL CONFIGURATION OF THE BALKANS.........8 II - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES .........................................10 III - EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE PANNONIAN ONOMASTICS.......11 IV - DEVELOPMENT OF PALEOGRAPHY IN THE BALKANS....33 V – THRACE ........................................................................................37 VI – PREHISTORIC MACEDONIA....................................................41 VII - THESSALY - PREHISTORIC AEOLIA.....................................62 VIII – EPIRUS – PELASGIAN TESPROTIA......................................69
  • Popes in History

    Popes in History

    popes in history medals by Ľudmila Cvengrošová text by Mons . Viliam Judák Dear friends, Despite of having long-term experience in publishing in other areas, through the AXIS MEDIA company I have for the first time entered the environment of medal production. There have been several reasons for this decision. The topic going beyond the borders of not only Slovakia but the ones of Europe as well. The genuine work of the academic sculptress Ľudmila Cvengrošová, an admirable and nice artist. The fine text by the Bishop Viliam Judák. The “Popes in history” edition in this range is a unique work in the world. It proves our potential to offer a work eliminating borders through its mission. Literally and metaphorically, too. The fabulous processing of noble metals and miniatures produced with the smallest details possible will for sure attract the interest of antiquarians but also of those interested in this topic. Although this is a limited edition I am convinced that it will be provided to everybody who wants to commemorate significant part of the historical continuity and Christian civilization. I am pleased to have become part of this unique project, and I believe that whether the medals or this lovely book will present a good message on us in the world and on the world in us. Ján KOVÁČIK AXIS MEDIA 11 Celebrities grown in the artist’s hands There is one thing we always know for sure – that by having set a target for himself/herself an artist actually opens a wonderful world of invention and creativity. In the recent years the academic sculptress and medal maker Ľudmila Cvengrošová has devoted herself to marvellous group projects including a precious cycle of male and female monarchs of the House of Habsburg crowned at the St.
  • The Power of the Popes

    The Power of the Popes

    THE POWER OF THE POPES is eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at hp://www.gutenberg.org/license. Title: e Power Of e Popes Author: Pierre Claude François Daunou Release Date: Mar , [EBook #] Language: English Character set encoding: UTF- *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE POWER OF THE POPES*** Produced by David Widger. ii THE POWER OF THE POPES By Pierre Claude François Daunou AN HISTORICAL ESSAY ON THEIR TEMPORAL DOMINION, AND THE ABUSE OF THEIR SPIRITUAL AUTHORITY Two Volumes in One CONTENTS TRANSLATORS PREFACE ADVERTISEMENT TO THE THIRD EDITION, ORIGINAL CHAPTER I. ORIGIN OF THE TEMPORAL POWER OF THE POPES CHAPTER II. ENTERPRIZES OF THE POPES OF THE NINTH CENTURY CHAPTER III. TENTH CENTURY CHAPTER IV. ENTERPRISES OF THE POPES OF THE ELEVENTH CEN- TURY CHAPTER V. CONTESTS BETWEEN THE POPES AND THE SOVEREIGNS OF THE TWELFTH CENTURY CHAPTER VI. POWER OF THE POPES OF THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY CHAPTER VII. FOURTEENTH CENTURY CHAPTER VIII. FIFTEENTH CENTURY CHAPTER IX. POLICY OF THE POPES OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY CHAPTER X. ATTEMPTS OF THE POPES OF THE SEVENTEENTH CEN- TURY CHAPTER XII. RECAPITULATION CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE ENDNOTES AND iv TO THE REV. RICHARD T. P. POPE, AT WHOSE SUGGESTION IT WAS UNDERTAKEN, THIS TRANSLATION OF THE PAPAL POWER IS INSCRIBED, AS A SMALL TRIBUTE OF RESPET AND REGARD BY HIS AFFECTIONATE FRIEND, THE TRANSLATOR. TRANSLATORS PREFACE HE Work of whi the following is a translation, had its origin in the trans- T actions whi took place between Pius VII.
  • The Court of Cyrus the Younger in Anatolia: Some Remarks

    The Court of Cyrus the Younger in Anatolia: Some Remarks

    STUDIES IN ANCIENT ART AND CIVILIZATION, VOL. 23 (2019) pp. 95-111, https://doi.org/10.12797/SAAC.23.2019.23.05 Michał Podrazik University of Rzeszów THE COURT OF CYRUS THE YOUNGER IN ANATOLIA: SOME REMARKS Abstract: Cyrus the Younger (born in 424/423 BC, died in 401 BC), son of the Great King Darius II (424/423-404 BC) and Queen Parysatis, is well known from his activity in Anatolia. In 408 BC he took power there as a karanos (Old Persian *kārana-, Greek κάρανος), a governor of high rank with extensive military and political competence reporting directly to the Great King. Holding his power in Anatolia, Cyrus had his own court there, in many respects modeled after the Great King’s court. The aim of this article is to show some aspects of functioning and organization of Cyrus the Younger’s court in Anatolia. Keywords: Cyrus the Younger; court; court’s staff and protocol In 4081, Cyrus, commonly known as the Younger (424/423-401), son of the Great King Darius II (424/423-404), was appointed by his father to rule over an important part of the Achaemenid Empire, Anatolia. Cyrus wielded his power there as karanos (Old Persian *kārana-, Greek κάρανος), a high- ranking governor with extensive military and political competence, reporting directly to the Great King (see Podrazik 2018, 69-83; cf. Barkworth 1993, 150-151; Debord 1999, 122-123; Briant 2002, 19, 321, 340, 600, 625-626, 878, 1002; Hyland 2013, 2-5). Cyrus held his own court while in Anatolia. The court was organized along the lines of the King’s court, but was certainly no match for it 1 All dates in the article pertain to the events before the birth of Christ except where otherwise stated.
  • In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree Of

    In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree Of

    LES FAICTZ DE JESUS CHRIST ET DU PAPE: THE POLEMICS OF FRENCH REFORM BEFORE CALVIN Octavian Lucian Jarnea Faculty ofReligious Studies McGiII University, Montreal August 2006 A thesis submitted to McGilI University In partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts © Octavian Lucian Jarnea 2006 Library and Bibliothèque et 1+1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-32527-8 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-32527-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, électronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
  • Downloadable

    Downloadable

    EXPERT-LED PETER SOMMER ARCHAEOLOGICAL & CULTURAL TRAVELS TOURS & GULET CRUISES 2021 PB Peter Sommer Travels Peter Sommer Travels 1 WELCOME WHY TRAVEL WITH US? TO PETER SOMMER TR AVELS Writing this in autumn 2020, it is hard to know quite where to begin. I usually review the season just gone, the new tours that we ran, the preparatory recces we made, the new tours we are unveiling for the next year, the feedback we have received and our exciting plans for the future. However, as you well know, this year has been unlike any other in our collective memory. Our exciting plans for 2020 were thrown into disarray, just like many of yours. We were so disappointed that so many of you were unable to travel with us in 2020. Our greatest pleasure is to share the destinations we have grown to love so deeply with you our wonderful guests. I had the pleasure and privilege of speaking with many of you personally during the 2020 season. I was warmed and touched by your support, your understanding, your patience, and your generosity. All of us here at PST are extremely grateful and heartened by your enthusiasm and eagerness to travel with us when it becomes possible. PST is a small, flexible, and dynamic company. We have weathered countless downturns during the many years we have been operating. Elin, my wife, and I have always reinvested in the business with long term goals and are very used to surviving all manner of curve balls, although COVID-19 is certainly the biggest we have yet faced.
  • War and Peace in Ancient and Medieval History

    War and Peace in Ancient and Medieval History

    War and Peace in Ancient and Medieval History edited by Philip de Souza and John France CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521817035 © Cambridge University Press 2008 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published in print format 2008 ISBN-13 978-0-511-38080-8 eBook (Adobe Reader) ISBN-13 978-0-521-81703-5 hardback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of urls for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Contents List of contributors page vii Acknowledgements ix Note on abbreviations xi 1 Introduction Philip de Souza and John France 1 2 Making and breaking treaties in the Greek world P. J. Rhodes 6 3 War, peace and diplomacy in Graeco-Persian relations from the sixth to the fourth century BC Eduard Rung 28 4 Treaties, allies and the Roman conquest of Italy J. W. Rich 51 5 Parta victoriis pax: Roman emperors as peacemakers Philip de Souza 76 6 Treaty-making in Late Antiquity A. D.